From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 00:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010046.n110kDBQ009487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-01-31 19:46:12 EDT --- OK, here's the review, with questions (?), issues (*) and comments (!). ? From what you told, I understand that you are the upstream maintainer too. So why are the patches? This confuses me. Can't they be integrated into the source? Also why use autoreconf? ? Why are those header files are getting removed? And if they are irrelevant, why are being installed by the Makefile? An explanation please, preferably in the SPEC file as a comment. * Generally, all the patches need to be explained as comments in the SPEC file (and they need to be sent upstream but we skip this part). It's best to keep the SPEC file at a state where a new package maintainer can take it over easily without spending hours to figure out what's going on. * Now, the rpmlint complaints: libdrm.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: libdrm-2.4.0-no-freaking-mknod.patch should be removed if it's useless libdrm.src: W: strange-permission make-git-snapshot.sh 0755 we should have 644 for source files libdrm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/91-drm-modeset.rules this %files entry should be a %config libdrm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation at the least, the file "libdrm/ChangeLog" and the "tests" directory can go in here. * %description should be descriptive, not a carbon copy of the summary. * libdrm/TODO should go to %doc * The upstream should be advised to put a copy of the full text of the license in a seperate COPYING file. ! The timestamp of the sourcefile is wrong (should be downloaded with "wget -N" or such) ! BR: pkgconfig is not required since libxcb-devel will pull that up. * /etc/udev/rules.d is not owned. So we must require the package that owns it (which, I think, is udev). * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). This applies to the devel package. * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 00:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010059.n110xHM1004196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-31 19:59:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Chitlesh notified me of this thread. > > The src/ prefix is because many users have multiple versions of SystemPerl > installed (generally in a repository) and just point to the one they want. > > Lane has a the right solution for the present version, as makefiles etc > also have the src/ path hardcoded. If there's a strong objection to the > extra src/ in the path, I can add a new envvariable that will set the location. Hello Wilson, >From my point of view, in order to ease the installation of multiple version of SystemPerl, those *.cpp should rather be placed into -- /usr/include/perl-SystemPerl - for the distribution supported package -- /usr/include/perl-SystemPerl-$version - for parallel installations I would welcome an envvariable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 01:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:11:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010111.n111BiPw014514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-31 20:11:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Source code quality: > Building on FC10 exposes an "exciting amount" of "not-so-harmless" warnings. > Some of them definitely are worth going after and be fixed. Hello Ralf, can you help to improve those warnings please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 01:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010113.n111D9E1006936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-31 20:13:08 EDT --- Ping Brennan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 01:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010118.n111IxNJ015698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #24 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-01-31 20:18:58 EDT --- I'm closing this bug: Reason : No simulator currently available under fedora If the situation changes, I will still be interested to push OVM into fedora repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 01:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010120.n111KADn008418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Bernard Johnson 2009-01-31 20:20:08 EDT --- Thanks Parag AN(????)! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sane Short Description: Perl extension for the SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy) Project Owners: bjohnson Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 01:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010153.n111ruJT022174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-01-31 20:53:55 EDT --- Marked these files as %doc New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-mocha.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f10/SRPMS/rubygem-mocha-0.9.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 02:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010222.n112MpYR027828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sahartsu at xs4all.n | |l) --- Comment #32 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-01-31 21:22:48 EDT --- Stefan, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 02:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010225.n112P3fs020654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-31 21:25:02 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: giver.x86_64: E: no-binary giver.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. => rpmlint is obviously wrong here, I'll dig later why [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 969e794f61a7ef94396a830b1fa623b93679c8c3 giver-0.1.8.tar.gz [x] Package is known to require ExcludeArch Arches excluded: ppc64 sparc64 Why: No mono implementation for ppc64 or sparc64 right now [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. Duplicate BuildRequires: mono-core (by avahi-sharp), perl(XML::Parser) (by intltool) =>Not a blocker. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 02:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474012] Review Request: qodem - terminal emulator and communications package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010243.n112htuf031753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474012 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-31 21:43:54 EDT --- Jeff, is there an updated package available for review ? At http://marlene.zimage.com/packages/ I can only see the first src.rpm Please do not forget to increment the release tag and add a proper entry in the changelog each time you make modifications to the spec. Are you already sponsored? I have not found you in FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 03:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483421] New: Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 Summary: Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/apophysis-j/2.6-1/apophysis-j.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/apophysis-j/2.6-1/apophysis-j-2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: apophysis-j is a Java port of the famous fractal flame editor Apophysis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 03:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010335.n113Ztxd009317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-31 22:35:54 EDT --- sorry, I meant: [x] Package functions as described. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 03:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010335.n113ZTvM009255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-01-31 22:35:28 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, contai ning the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: a2959c23a3614fc7358bf73a00ec54f911396e58 PosteRazor-1.5-Source.zip [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. Would be nice to have a "touch -r" in the loop which removes the "\r"s in order to preserve the timestamps. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 06:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010631.n116VFfl001617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 01:31:14 EDT --- Here are my notes: ! rpmlint says: kde-plasma-weather.x86_64: W: no-documentation but there is really no documentation, so this can be ignored ? The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Upstream webpage says: "For those looking for the weather forecast plasmoid (that's the official name of it), it's now..." So shall we call this package "kde-plasma-weatherforecast" instead? * please make use of the %{name} macro. * According to the guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages the pre-release packages are versioned in a special way. Check the "kismet" example given in the above link. So it would probably better to change Version: 0.0 Release: 0.2%{?dist}.20090130svn to Version: 0 Release: 0.2.20090130svn%{?dist} The right-hand side of the disttag is to be used when there is a fix in an older branch, e.g. F-9 * Isn't plasma-devel provided by kdelibs-devel which is one of the dependencies of kdebase-workspace-devel? So, that BR seems redundant. * Fedora-specific flag -fexceptions is overriden by -fno-exceptions but I think this is a problem with the compilation of kde itself. Can this be fixed? * Do we really need call ldconfig on post{,un} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 07:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010711.n117BQJx016887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 --- Comment #10 from Dave Airlie 2009-02-01 02:11:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, here's the review, with questions (?), issues (*) and comments (!). > > ? From what you told, I understand that you are the upstream maintainer too. So > why are the patches? This confuses me. Can't they be integrated into the > source? Also why use autoreconf? We ship stuff in Fedora this isn't released fully suitable for upstream yet, libdrm is a small component in a the big kernel/X stack, nothing can hit a released libdrm until corresponding code is shipped in the upstream kernel, so we carry kernel patches + libdrm patches until the code is all in the correct upstream places. We use autoreconf because we change Makefile.am's and we need to reconfigure. > ? Why are those header files are getting removed? And if they are irrelevant, > why are being installed by the Makefile? An explanation please, preferably in > the SPEC file as a comment. Upstream and kernel are still working out ownership of certain header files, the kernel now installs some header files and we are working on transitioning libdrm away from this task, its not an overnight task. 2.4.5 will hopefully have a configure option. > > * Generally, all the patches need to be explained as comments in the SPEC file > (and they need to be sent upstream but we skip this part). It's best to keep > the SPEC file at a state where a new package maintainer can take it over easily > without spending hours to figure out what's going on. I've put some info in there but no new package maintainer will ever take it over, libdrm is part of the X stack, we have a team in RH looking after it, if someone new joins the team they already know what we are up to with libdrm. > * Now, the rpmlint complaints: > libdrm.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: > libdrm-2.4.0-no-freaking-mknod.patch Okay I can drop that I think we fixed it upstream. > should be removed if it's useless > libdrm.src: W: strange-permission make-git-snapshot.sh 0755 > we should have 644 for source files This isn't a source file its a script you run to make a snapshot of libdrm from git for shipping it never gets shipped. so I'm leaving it as-is. > libdrm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/udev/rules.d/91-drm-modeset.rules > this %files entry should be a %config good point. > libdrm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > at the least, the file "libdrm/ChangeLog" and the "tests" directory can go in > here. the changelog is no longer generated, the tests aren't actually tests, they are like little apps, that aren't really used by anyone anymore, so I don't want to ship or even try and support them. > > * %description should be descriptive, not a carbon copy of the summary. Not sure we can say more, that's all it is, its the runtime library supporting the direct rendering management infrastructure. Nobody uses this library outside of mesa and X stuff, its not general purpose by any means. it used to be part of the X server and mesa internals. > > * libdrm/TODO should go to %doc Sorely out of date so no point. > > * The upstream should be advised to put a copy of the full text of the license > in a seperate COPYING file. its MIT/BSD if a patch appeared upstream I'd apply it but I've a lot bigger things to worry about, but its on every file in the package. > > ! The timestamp of the sourcefile is wrong (should be downloaded with "wget -N" > or such) will fix that next revision upload hopefully. > > ! BR: pkgconfig is not required since libxcb-devel will pull that up. I'd prefer to keep it explicit just in case we figure out we don't need libxcb-devel later. > > * /etc/udev/rules.d is not owned. So we must require the package that owns it > (which, I think, is udev). done. > > * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for > directory ownership and usability). This applies to the devel package. done. > > * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, > this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. it should be supported not sure why it was disabled - re-enabled Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 07:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478007] Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010716.n117GXQi010496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 --- Comment #19 from David Timms 2009-02-01 02:16:32 EDT --- For future reference for similar non Fedora application support packages, please see the FESCo IRC log at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Fesco_IRC_Log_20090130#tJan_30_11:46:53 and summary: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/104241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 07:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225999] Merge Review: libdrm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010737.n117bWPc021726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 02:37:31 EDT --- You're welcome. I thank you for the nice explanations in a language understandable by non low-level programmers. Most of the issues I pointed are solved and the remaining ones are defended with valid reasonings. ---------------------------------------------- This Merge Review (libdrm) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------- Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 07:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010744.n117iw7R023008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-01 02:44:56 EDT --- > 1) Is anyone going to make a full review for this + sponsoring the packager? I unfortunately don't believe due to packaging policies that songbird can be included until it can be compiled against the Fedora xulrunner rather than its own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 09:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453573] Review Request: cdemu-daemon - userspace daemon for use with cdemu suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902010934.n119YcCT006591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453573 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |belegdol at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Julian Sikorski 2009-02-01 04:34:37 EDT --- Jiri, did you consider submitting the review to RPM Fusion for the time being? Packages requiring kmods are hosted there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 10:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] New: Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Summary: Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kernel01 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-1.src.rpm Description: Argtable is an ANSI C library for parsing GNU style command line arguments. It enables a program's command line syntax to be defined in the source code as an array of argtable structs. The command line is then parsed according to that specification and the resulting values are returned in those same structs where they are accessible to the main program. Both tagged (-v, --verbose, --foo=bar) and untagged arguments are supported, as are multiple instances of each argument. Syntax error handling is automatic and the library also provides the means for displaying the command line syntax directly from the array of argument specifications. Argtable can function as a "getopt_long" replacement, without the user of the program noticing the difference. Unlike "getopt_long", argtable is cross platform and works on Windows and Mac as well as Posix systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 10:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011025.n11APKWs024610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Jess Portnoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://argtable.sourceforge | |.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 11:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011110.n11BA9q1001310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 11:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011110.n11BA7pB001252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478539 Depends on| |482807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 11:09:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:09:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] New: Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Summary: Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: INDI is a distributed control protocol designed to operate astronomical instrumentation. INDI is small, flexible, easy to parse, and scalable. It supports common DCS functions such as remote control, data acquisition, monitoring, and a lot more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 11:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011113.n11BDjo0001888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-01 06:13:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-cmakeed Short Description: CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 12:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011211.n11CBm5c006898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-01 07:11:46 EDT --- Looks fine but I believe the -devel package also needs to have a "Requires: gtk-doc". Other than that it all looks OK. APPROVED. + rpmlint output rpmlint -i libhildon-2.0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm edad45e30d8388411edf14116dbac2f3 libhildon_2.0.6-1.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011300.n11D08tU016826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-01 08:00:06 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483450] New: Review Request: ginac - C++ library for symbolic calculations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ginac - C++ library for symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483450 Summary: Review Request: ginac - C++ library for symbolic calculations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ginac.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ginac-1.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.ginac.de/ Description: GiNaC is designed to allow the creation of integrated systems that embed symbolic manipulations together with more established areas of computer science (like computation- intense numeric applications, graphical inter- faces, etc.) under one roof. GiNaC is an iterated and recursive acronym for GiNaC is Not a CAS, where CAS stands for Computer Algebra System. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097245 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint ginac* ginac.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libginac-1.4.so.0.0.4 exit at GLIBC_2.0 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint ginac-1.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I reported upstream about the rpmlint issue but so far I have no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225979] Merge Review: lam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011346.n11DkrIt002943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225979 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Depends on| |473593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483450] Review Request: ginac - C++ library for symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011349.n11Dnqu6027963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483450 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-01 08:49:52 EDT --- Isn't already on fedora repositories ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011352.n11Dq3i1004128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 08:52:02 EDT --- > So shall we call this package "kde-plasma-weatherforecast" instead? It's under extragear/base/plasma/applets/weather in KDE SVN, that's where the name "weather" comes from. > * please make use of the %{name} macro. What for? It's not like the name is going to change frequently. That's just useless use of macros which doesn't help anyone. > Version: 0 I thought the recommended version to use for checkouts without a version was 0.0, maybe it changed or maybe I just remembered wrong. (I see they use just 0 in Packaging:NamingGuidelines.) But if I change it from 0.0 to 0 now, this will break the upgrade path for those who already installed the package from kde-redhat testing. 0.0 will upgrade just fine to any version number they'll actually use. > Release: 0.2.20090130svn%{?dist} OK, I can put the %{?dist} at the end, not sure why I put it before, probably just a typo. (Not that the guidelines clearly say that 0.2%{?dist}.20090130svn is invalid, but I agree that 0.2.20090130svn%{?dist} makes more sense.) > * Isn't plasma-devel provided by kdelibs-devel which is one of the dependencies > of kdebase-workspace-devel? So, that BR seems redundant. What if we make a separate plasma-devel one day? But those "redundant" BRs have also been removed from other packages so I can remove it from this one too. > * Fedora-specific flag -fexceptions is overriden by -fno-exceptions but I think > this is a problem with the compilation of kde itself. Can this be fixed? It's a KDE "feature". I can bring this up at the next KDE SIG meeting. But does it really matter for this package? It makes sense for a library > * Do we really need call ldconfig on post{,un} ? Good question. I think we don't, as there's no public shared library, only a plugin in %{_kde4_libdir}/kde4. I'll remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011354.n11Dseo3029212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 08:54:39 EDT --- Actually, I'll replace Version: 0.0 with a real version number, I just asked the upstream author what to use. I also asked him whether he prefers kde-plasma-weather or kde-plasma-weatherforecast. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 13:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011359.n11DxIbq030254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 08:59:17 EDT --- Oh, I didn't finish my sentence: I was saying: it makes sense for a library to require exception-safety (and thus -fexceptions) because users of the library may want to use exceptions, but for an application or a plasmoid, it's pretty much irrelevant. And in any case it's not an issue with this package, but with the general KDE default flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 14:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011406.n11E6GZS032290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shawn.starr at rogers.com Flag| |needinfo?(shawn.starr at roger | |s.com) --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 09:06:15 EDT --- Waiting for feedback from upstream: spstarr_work: What's the official version number of the weather forecast plasmoid? 1.0 prerelease (i.e. 1.0-0.1.2009xxxxsvn)? And should it be called kde-plasma-weather or kde-plasma-weatherforecast? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 14:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483451] New: Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483451 Summary: Review Request: k3guitune - Musical instrument tuner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dtimms at iinet.net.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/k3guitune/k3guitune.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/k3guitune/k3guitune-1.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: 3Guitune is a guitar-and-other-instruments tuner. It takes a signal from the microphone, calculates its frequency, and displays it on a note scale graphic and an oscilloscope. It supports normal, Wien, and physical tuning. === rpmlint: k3guitune.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common k3guitune.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common k3guitune.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/common k3guitune.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/common k3guitune.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common k3guitune.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. ==== This package is not quite ready: 1. Need to work out what is going on with the locales stuff, and the rpmlint warnings above: /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/k3guitune/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/common Any tips regarding locales in specs appreciated. 2. In the default audio driver=auto mode, no audio is detected changing this oss works, but also no audio detected. If you switch to alsa mode, the application segfaults: http://fedora.pastebin.com/m4b5602f5 3. The patch for .desktop icon field doesn't match the name of the icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 14:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483450] Review Request: ginac - C++ library for symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011411.n11EBND4008569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483450 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-01 09:11:22 EDT --- It is... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/ginac -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 14:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483453] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Method/perl-MooseX-Method.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Method/perl-MooseX-Method-0.43-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Method declaration with type checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 14:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011435.n11EZ8L6005660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-01 09:35:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330550) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330550) python 2.6 patch (proposed) For 1.0-4 * Dependency ----------------------------------------------------------- $ grep 'import ' xword import pygtk import gtk import gtk.gdk import gobject import gnomeprint import gnomeprint.ui import pango import sys import time import os, os.path import md5 import pickle import ConfigParser ----------------------------------------------------------- - It seems "Requires: pygtk2 gnome-python2-gnomeprint" is sufficient. * Scriptlets - For desktop-file-install, now "--vendor=fedora" is not needed (guidelines changed): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage - "Requires: shared-mime-info" is not needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo * Some misc issue ----------------------------------------------------------- %prep .... mkdir mime cp -p %SOURCE2 mime ----------------------------------------------------------- - What are these lines for? ----------------------------------------------------------- gzip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 ----------------------------------------------------------- - Not needed. rpmbuild itself gzip's this automatically. * Macros in %changelog - In changelog, when you write macros please use %% instead of % to prevent macros from being expanded. * Python warning - By the way now rawhide uses python 2.6 and xword causes some warnings: ------------------------------------------------------------ ./xword:50: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead import md5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Would you check if the attached patch works for you? Then I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 15:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an attempt to add smalltalk-like streams to Moose. It currently works with ArrayRefs and HashRefs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 15:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483461] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483461 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Param/perl-MooseX-Param.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Param/perl-MooseX-Param-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a very simple Moose role which provides a CGI like param method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 15:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011550.n11FoTlH018848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-01 10:50:28 EDT --- ok, the only reason to strip tarball is to make it smaller, there are no forbidden contents in it. I have mailed upstream about shipping each package in your own tarball https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/2009-January/000190.html here are a updated version without stripping tarball http://ispbrasil.com.br/bucardo/bucardo.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/bucardo/bucardo-3.0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 16:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] New: Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-TempDir/perl-Test-TempDir.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-TempDir/perl-Test-TempDir-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Test::TempDir provides temporary directory creation with testing in mind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 16:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453573] Review Request: cdemu-daemon - userspace daemon for use with cdemu suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011633.n11GX393001067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453573 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Moskovcak 2009-02-01 11:33:02 EDT --- Yes, but they want me to convert the kernel modules from dkms to akmod and I don't have time for that now, but I'd like to get cdemu to fedora asap. Jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 17:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011728.n11HSALl011004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 17:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011751.n11Hpsf7015041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 12:51:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > * please make use of the %{name} macro. > > What for? It's not like the name is going to change frequently. That's just > useless use of macros which doesn't help anyone. > I've been told in many reviews that %{name} should be used extensively, except a couple places like the URL. Even now, since there's a possibility that the package name may be changed, it might come handy. (In reply to comment #3) > Actually, I'll replace Version: 0.0 with a real version number, I just asked > the upstream author what to use. I also asked him whether he prefers > kde-plasma-weather or kde-plasma-weatherforecast. alright. let's wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011801.n11I1kCn016611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-01 13:01:45 EDT --- > I've been told in many reviews that %{name} should be used extensively Did this advice have basis in fedora's packaging guidelines? If so, where? All I'm aware of, is that macros should be used consistently, ie, avoid using %{name} in some places and hard-code it others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011820.n11IK3hK019551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 13:20:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > I've been told in many reviews that %{name} should be used extensively > > Did this advice have basis in fedora's packaging guidelines? If so, where? > I'm not 100% sure that it is in the guidelines (I never found it). But I have been told this so many times by different reviewers, that I took it as an unwritten convention, or maybe it is so deeply hidden inside the guidelines that nobody remembers where it is... or it is just a legend. If it is an unwritten convention, sure, you don't have to obey it. But it would be nice if you do. side note: Another thing that I've been told many times to use in a very specific unique way and that I couldn't find in the guidelines is %defattr(-,root,root,-) > All I'm aware of, is that macros should be used consistently, ie, avoid using > %{name} in some places and hard-code it others. Well, strictly speaking, since %{name} has to be used in the BuildRoot, any other usage will cause an inconsistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011821.n11ILjKe019895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-01 13:21:43 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I'd intended to take care of this Friday night. But here it is. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. SEE LATER - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches Not included upstream - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: $ md5sum ../../build/SOURCES/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz b3d2897e6c4265561ce728568d2bce3d ../../build/SOURCES/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz b3d2897e6c4265561ce728568d2bce3d perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13.tar.gz N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. N/A- Doc subpackage needed/used. No %doc files - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. -- Please include the README from upstream here, and actually the full license N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. FAIL - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and anything provided by glibc.) perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.13-1.fc11.noarch.rpm config(perl-NOCpulse-Debug) = 1.23.13-1.fc11 perl(NOCpulse::Debug) = 1.23 perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream) perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::html) perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::html_comment) perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::literal) perl(NOCpulse::Debug::Stream::stdout) perl(NOCpulse::Debuggable) perl(NOCpulse::DependencyGraph) perl(NOCpulse::Log::LogManager) perl(NOCpulse::Log::Logger) perl(NOCpulse::Log::test::TestLogger) perl-NOCpulse-Debug = 1.23.13-1.fc11 = config(perl-NOCpulse-Debug) = 1.23.13-1.fc11 nocpulse-common perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::MethodMaker) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(IO::Handle) perl(NOCpulse::Config) perl(NOCpulse::Debug) perl(NOCpulse::Log::LogManager) perl(NOCpulse::Log::Logger) SHOULD Items: OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs Didn't test - Should function as described. No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Please remove ownership of directories %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse and ${_sysconfdir}/nocpulse. These are both owned by nocpulse-common, which you Require, and two packages can't own the same directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011831.n11IVMFZ015101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Shawn Starr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(shawn.starr at roger | |s.com) | --- Comment #9 from Shawn Starr 2009-02-01 13:31:22 EDT --- Well, the plasmoid is "Weather Forecast" but we didn't change the .desktop file to reflect this. X-KDE-Library=plasma_applet_weather You could call the RPM kde-plasma-weatherforecast but the installed plasmoid is 'plasma_applet_weather' Version is '1.0' for KDE 4.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011836.n11Iab1A022399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:36:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011835.n11IZMqK022125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:35:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011839.n11Idcjn016425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:39:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011837.n11Ibr84016187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:37:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011840.n11IeY2o016941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:40:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011841.n11Ifqrf023378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:41:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011843.n11IhoXa023561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:43:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011846.n11IkCSp017889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 13:46:11 EDT --- I'm not sure if this is related to packaging. The image on the left-hand side of the applet does not look right. No matter how the weather is, it shows me a large black ? contained in a larger white rectangle. Is this what this plasmoid supposed to show? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483074] Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011849.n11In31f024396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:49:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483079] Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011851.n11IpeYC025022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:51:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011849.n11In1oe018119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-02-01 13:49:00 EDT --- Included in cvs: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/xmlenc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011851.n11Ip6CZ018700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #2 from MERCIER 2009-02-01 13:51:05 EDT --- $ koji build --scratch dist-f10 rpmbuild/SRPMS/spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: rpmbuild/SRPMS/spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:36 1.16 MiB 32.71 KiB/sec Created task: 1097523 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097523 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1097523 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm): free 1097523 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1097524 buildArch (spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): free 1097524 buildArch (spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): free -> open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1097524 buildArch (spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1097523 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1097523 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-3.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011852.n11Iqupp025234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483258] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011853.n11Irw0T025356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483258 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 13:53:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:52:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011852.n11IqQiF025168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-02-01 13:52:25 EDT --- Included in cvs: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gimp-fourier-plugin/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011856.n11IuEpk019610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-02-01 13:56:14 EDT --- At last found the right way to close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011901.n11J1fd1020724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 14:01:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011900.n11J01Pj020043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 14:00:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 18:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481667] Review Request: xmlenc - XML output library for java. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011857.n11IvBp7019770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481667 Fabian Deutsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-02-01 13:57:10 EDT --- At last found the right way to close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011904.n11J4XWL027309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 14:04:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011905.n11J5Nvo027722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 14:05:22 EDT --- > side note: Another thing that I've been told many times to use in a very > specific unique way and that I couldn't find in the guidelines is > %defattr(-,root,root,-) That one is because the files must be owned by root. Without this, they can be owned by some other user depending on how the RPM package is built. > The image on the left-hand side of the applet does not look right. No matter > how the weather is, it shows me a large black ? contained in a larger white > rectangle. This is because the BBC reports the current weather conditions as N/A for several locations. Apparently they don't get reports of weather conditions, only temperature and wind. So we get a huge N/A icon. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011902.n11J2v9F020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-01 14:02:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011904.n11J4DP3021046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #5 from MERCIER 2009-02-01 14:04:12 EDT --- http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-5.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation-1.3-5.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/Citation.spec _____________________________________________________ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/Citation.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/Citation-1.3-5.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/Citation-1.3-5.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _____________________________________________________ # rpm -ivh Citation-1.3-5.fc10.noarch.rpm Pr?paration... ########################################### [100%] 1:Citation ########################################### [100%] # ls /usr/share/gdesklets/Displays/Citation/ bg citation.display citation.png citation.script ]# ls /usr/share/doc/Citation-1.3/ COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011912.n11JCxML022620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 14:12:58 EDT --- * Sun Feb 01 2009 Kevin Kofler 1.0-0.1.20090130svn - Set Version to 1.0 - Fix Release (put alphatag before disttag) - Remove redundant BR plasma-devel - Don't call ldconfig, not needed - Use %%{name} macro Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/kde-plasma-weather.spec New SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/kde-plasma-weather-1.0-0.1.20090130svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011925.n11JPINt031183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 14:25:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > side note: Another thing that I've been told many times to use in a very > > specific unique way and that I couldn't find in the guidelines is > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > That one is because the files must be owned by root. Without this, they can be > owned by some other user depending on how the RPM package is built. > I was more considered about the "-"s. I don't know why %defattr(-,root,root) or %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) is "bad" (even for RPMs for which one doesn't need to assign exotic permissions) > > The image on the left-hand side of the applet does not look right. No matter > > how the weather is, it shows me a large black ? contained in a larger white > > rectangle. > > This is because the BBC reports the current weather conditions as N/A for > several locations. Apparently they don't get reports of weather conditions, > only temperature and wind. So we get a huge N/A icon. :-( That's what I suspected. The weather in this s.hole where I reside is so cold that BBC doesn't know how to picture it. Anyways, the package is good to go now. (One last thing, just an idea to clear possible confusions in the future): you can add to the description that this plasmoid is planned to be included in KDE 4.3.) ----------------------------------------------------- This package (kde-plasma-weather) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011946.n11Jkc2r002301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 14:46:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-weather Short Description: Plasma applet for weather forecasts Owners: kkofler spstarr Branches: InitialCC: tuxbrewr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:45:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011945.n11JjEQC028145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-01 14:45:13 EDT --- Good: + License tag say GPLv2+ as an OSS license wich matches with the copyright notes in the source files. + Adding blank lines betweens the paragraphs. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011948.n11JmmcZ028531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 14:48:47 EDT --- Oops, forgot to request branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 19:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902011949.n11JnIlq028606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-01 14:49:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-weather Short Description: Plasma applet for weather forecasts Owners: kkofler spstarr Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: tuxbrewr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 20:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012021.n11KL8bY007954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 Oliver Falk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 20:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012023.n11KNTWG001667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 --- Comment #5 from Oliver Falk 2009-02-01 15:23:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hatools Short Description: Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment Owners: oliver Branches: EPEL-4 EPEL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 20:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012059.n11KxhBV013529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-02-01 15:59:41 EDT --- The .src.rpm fails to build on my Rawhide system (local rpmbuild) : libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -shared .libs/libatk-1.0-0.dll.def .libs/atkaction.o .libs/atkcomponent.o .libs/atkdocument.o .libs/atkeditabletext.o .libs/atkgobjectaccessible.o .libs/atkhyperlink.o .libs/atkhyperlinkimpl.o .libs/atkhypertext.o .libs/atkimage.o .libs/atknoopobject.o .libs/atknoopobjectfactory.o .libs/atkobject.o .libs/atkobjectfactory.o .libs/atkregistry.o .libs/atkrelation.o .libs/atkrelationset.o .libs/atkselection.o .libs/atkstate.o .libs/atkstateset.o .libs/atkstreamablecontent.o .libs/atktable.o .libs/atktext.o .libs/atkutil.o .libs/atkmisc.o .libs/atkvalue.o .libs/atk-enum-types.o /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgobject-2.0.dll.a -L/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libglib-2.0.dll.a -lws2_32 -lole32 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libintl.dll.a /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libiconv.dll.a -mms-bitfields -Wl,atk-win32-res.o -o .libs/libatk-1.0-0.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/libatk-1.0.dll.a Creating library file: .libs/libatk-1.0.dll.a .libs/atkobject.o: In function `gettext_initialization': /home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/atk-1.25.2/atk/atkobject.c:403: undefined reference to `_g_getenv' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libatk-1.0.la] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/atk-1.25.2/atk' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 $ rpm -qa | grep mingw32 mingw32-iconv-1.12-7.fc11.noarch mingw32-binutils-2.19-1.fc11.x86_64 mingw32-dlfcn-0-0.3.r11.fc11.noarch mingw32-gcc-c++-4.3.2-12.fc11.x86_64 mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc11.noarch mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-7.fc11.noarch mingw32-glib2-2.19.5-3.fc11.noarch mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-5.fc11.noarch mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-12.fc11.noarch mingw32-libpng-1.2.34-2.fc11.noarch mingw32-gettext-0.17-8.fc11.noarch mingw32-filesystem-45-1.fc11.noarch mingw32-w32api-3.13-1.fc11.noarch mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-6.fc11.noarch mingw32-cpp-4.3.2-12.fc11.x86_64 mingw32-gcc-4.3.2-12.fc11.x86_64 mingw32-runtime-3.15.1-10.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 20:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] New: Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 Summary: Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-instant.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-instant-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Instant Description: Instant is a Python module that allows for instant inlining of C and C++ code in Python. It is a small Python module built on top of SWIG and Distutils. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097698 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-instant-0.9.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-instant-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012101.n11L1wuu014185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #22 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-02-01 16:01:56 EDT --- Well, it was an easy one this time. Fixed, thanks. http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji builds: F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097695 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012109.n11L9CGE008771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #23 from Ian Weller 2009-02-01 16:09:11 EDT --- This looks fine to me, I'm holding off on approval until the others are reviewed and I can test them all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012112.n11LCC1A015840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-01 16:12:09 EDT --- > > We already removed iLBC support from Asterisk - can we re-add this support > > back? > > Sorry for the delay. Red Hat Legal got this one wrong (it happens to everyone > sometimes). The iLBC codec needs to be removed from the opal tarball. > > Reblocking FE-Legal. I'm reported this upstream on the OPAL bug tracker. I've also had a direct email conversation with the ekiga maintainer and he agrees so is going to discuss this with the OPAL developers so hopefully will have an upstream fix for the ilbc issue shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012116.n11LG4bM009983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-01 16:16:03 EDT --- Thanks, will add the dependency to gtk-doc. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libhildon Short Description: Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries Owners: salimma Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012125.n11LPFKw011430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-01 16:25:14 EDT --- Note: gtk-doc is pulled in by gtk2-devel, so the initial packaging was correct; however, since the bulk of -devel is actually documentation, I'm splitting it to -doc (with explicit gtk-doc dependency this time); example files are moved there as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] New: Modern background Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Modern background https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 Summary: Modern background Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornatics at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon.spec rpmlint issue: _________________________________________________________________________ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/earth-and-moon.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _________________________________________________________________________ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] New: Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 Summary: Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ferari.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-ferari-0.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.fenics.org/wiki/FErari Description: FErari (Finite Element rearrangement to automatically reduce instructions) generates optimized code for evaluation of the element tensor (element stiffness matrix) and functions as an optimizing backend for FFC. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097726 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-ferari-0.0.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm python-ferari.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-ferari-0.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Modern background In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012145.n11LjmY7014540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 --- Comment #1 from MERCIER 2009-02-01 16:45:47 EDT --- $ koji build --scratch dist-f10 rpmbuild/SRPMS/earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: rpmbuild/SRPMS/earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:07:06 9.91 MiB 23.77 KiB/sec Created task: 1097741 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097741 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1097741 build (dist-f10, earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1097742 buildArch (earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc10.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1097742 buildArch (earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc10.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1097741 build (dist-f10, earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1097741 build (dist-f10, earth-and-moon-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Modern background In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012148.n11Lm76M021152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 21:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902012157.n11LvkSq016263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-01 16:57:45 EDT --- I managed to cut the size of the patches subpackage down to ~250MB by removing some banks (that are also not in the PersonalCopy-Lite) and by extracting only a single layer from each instrument. But 250MB is still too much. I'll work on it more. Here's my working copy if someone wants to help: http://6mata.com:8014/review/fluid-soundfont.spec.with.gus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 22:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] New: Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 Summary: Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-fiat.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-fiat-0.3.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.fenics.org/wiki/FIAT Description: The FInite element Automatic Tabulator FIAT supports generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements on lines, triangles, and tetrahedra. It is also capable of generating arbitrary order instances of Jacobi-type quadrature rules on the same element shapes. Upcoming versions will also support Hermite and nonconforming elements as well as H(div) and H(curl) elements such as Raviart-Thomas and Nedelec. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097748 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-fiat-0.3.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm python-fiat.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-fiat-0.3.4-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 1 22:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] New: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip Alias: perl-PerlIO-gzip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Summary: Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PerlIO-gzip/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-PerlIO-gzip.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-PerlIO-gzip-0.18-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: PerlIO::gzip provides a PerlIO layer that manipulates files in the format used by the gzip program. Compression and decompression are implemented. This is akin to Compress::Zlib, except that it operates at the lower PerlIO layer. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097838 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 00:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483079] Review Request: perl-constant-boolean - Define TRUE and FALSE constants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020038.n120cuhP012956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483079 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 00:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020049.n120n7MM020863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 19:49:06 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 70d0f0151c5b9d42019d5eff88d0c4d3738babc6 MooseX-Method-0.43.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 & koji scratch build [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 00:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020058.n120w8Yr022573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 19:58:07 EDT --- Sorry, I take it back for a second. I think that there are some Requires which need to be filtered out, at least: perl(Test::Exception) perl(Test::Moose) perl(Test::More) Also, some provides seem odd, and especially perl(Foo1) perl(Foo2) perl(Foo3) Am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483074] Review Request: perl-Exception-Base - Lightweight exceptions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020103.n1213DBf017551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483074 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020106.n1216aAv018281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 20:06:35 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1e61a292c89e236b1ef39a086059724ff80b15ff MooseX-Iterator-0.09.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes The package has some odd requires/provides: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --provides perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator-0.09-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Iterable) perl(MooseX::Iterator) = 0.09 perl(MooseX::Iterator::Array) = 0.09 perl(MooseX::Iterator::Hash) = 0.09 perl(MooseX::Iterator::Meta::Iterable) = 0.09 perl(MooseX::Iterator::Role) = 0.09 perl-MooseX-Iterator = 0.09-1.fc11 [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator-0.09-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Moose) perl(Moose) >= 0.26 perl(Moose::Role) perl(MooseX::Iterator::Array) perl(MooseX::Iterator::Hash) perl(MooseX::Iterator::Meta::Iterable) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Is it really intended to require what itself provides? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:12:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483461] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020112.n121CO4d019278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483461 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 20:12:23 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 870bc3d595aceb7f2e3ef20ee0cd0917b72e9510 MooseX-Param-0.02.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020127.n121RofZ028221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 20:27:49 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7eb8feb31d17ca559c31cb1a692439470d8ad6eb Test-TempDir-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. See issues [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English langu ages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ===Issues=== There are a lot of duplicate requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(File::NFSLock) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(Moose) perl(Moose) >= 0.50 perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(Test::TempDir::Factory) perl(Test::TempDir::Handle) perl(Test::use::ok) perl(namespace::clean) perl(namespace::clean) >= 0.08 perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 It looks like most of the stuff that you added as Requires is automatically picked up by rpmbuild, isn't it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020144.n121icDK024841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 20:44:37 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-TempDir/perl-Test-TempDir.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-TempDir/perl-Test-TempDir-0.04-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Feb 01 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.04-2 - Fix requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020150.n121oDpV026235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 20:50:12 EDT --- Hi, Requires and Provides is automatically picked up by rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020148.n121mcDD025741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 20:48:37 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator-0.09-2.fc10.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Feb 01 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.09-2 - Fix requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 01:52:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:52:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483461] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020152.n121qZYj000576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483461 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 20:52:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Param Short Description: Simple role to provide a standard param method Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020202.n1222vBV028937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 21:02:56 EDT --- I know it does, but I think (I might be wrong, though) that in this case it is not correct and they should be filtered out. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:09:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020209.n1229S2a030164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: SPE it is a |Review Request: SPE - |Python IDE editor released |Stani's Python Editor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020208.n1228drB030027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 21:08:38 EDT --- Jonathan, if you do not mind, please try to rephrase the %Summary field. "SPE Python IDE editor released" is not really correct in English. Maybe simply using "Python IDE editor" or "Python IDE with UML,PyChecker,Debugger,GUI design,Blender & more" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020212.n122C8Rk004977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 21:12:07 EDT --- OK, no dups any more APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020216.n122GZMM006025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 21:16:35 EDT --- I agree, i'll fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020218.n122IgJ6006250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 21:18:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-TempDir Short Description: Temporary files support for testing Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 02:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020218.n122IpbT032402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-01 21:18:50 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1097838 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 933fdf283a0d2739f7630420569e3b24 PerlIO-gzip-0.18.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=561, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.00 sys + 0.70 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.84 CPU) + Package perl-PerlIO-gzip-0.18-1.fc11 -> Provides: gzip.so perl(PerlIO::gzip) = 0.18 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libz.so.1 perl >= 0:5.008 perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483258] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020306.n1236EJj016051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483258 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020339.n123dWdA022510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-01 22:39:31 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Iterator/perl-MooseX-Iterator-0.09-3.fc10.src.rpm Changes: * Sun Feb 01 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.09-3 - Added filter requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:40:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020340.n123eQwk022932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #18 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-02-01 22:40:23 EDT --- The python-pydns is an optional dependency. The dns module is often handy for milters that need to lookup MX records, for callback, for instance - but is not part of the core functionality. Debian packages would have an optional dependency. In milter applications, missing optional packages result in smoothly degraded function. A user of pymilter, would get a package not found exception if they tried to use Milter/dns. I am torn, I really ought to put the simplified wrapper for pydns (Milter/dns) in pydns - but was reluctant to do so, wanting to minimize changes to pydns. But now that I am the maintainer of pydns, perhaps that is the best way. Milters could also use dnspython - a larger and more capable DNS library for python. In fact, pyspf-2.1 can use either library. So how does Fedora handle optional packages? Just add the dependency, and who cares if a few extra K for pydns is pulled in? I have a feeling it is either that or move the Milter/dns module to pydns. However, that does not solve the larger problem of optional or alternate libraries - which can crop up in any potentially dynamically linked language, including C. %python_sitelib - I am not clear when to use python-sitelib vs python-archlib. I am hearing however that the policy is to remove all unused macros - and resurrect them from CVS if needed. I will fix that and the other issues, and will think about whether to remove Milter/dns or just add the dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020346.n123kc1H024156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-01 22:46:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please remove ownership of directories %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse and > ${_sysconfdir}/nocpulse. These are both owned by nocpulse-common, which you > Require, and two packages can't own the same directories. Jon, please make yourself familiar with the FPG. %{perl_vendorlib}/NOCpulse _must_ be owned by both packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 03:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020359.n123xNC6026448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-01 22:59:21 EDT --- Clean package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 04:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481288] Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020417.n124HbLg023881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-01 23:17:36 EDT --- is this built so that we can CLOSE this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 04:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020435.n124ZvmY001269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 23:35:56 EDT --- Seems sane now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 04:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020447.n124l0OG003374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-01 23:46:59 EDT --- I'd say "gzip.so()" is a bit too generic as provides and leads to a potential clash in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 04:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020455.n124toBT005043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-01 23:55:49 EDT --- I am not planning to re-review this package, however at least - please take care of Fedora specicic compilation flags (I usually check if "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" appears correctly on build log) - Default optimization level on Fedora is -O2, not -O3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 05:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020531.n125V9pe011985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 00:31:08 EDT --- I think those Requires is ok as I see its been used by MooseX-Method-0.43/lib/MooseX/Test/Parameter/Moose.pm Yes. For me also following provides looks to be removed. Provides: perl(Foo1) perl(Foo2) perl(Foo3) perl(Foo::Parameter) perl(Foo::Role) Please don't take my words as Final. Either Chris or Ralf can confirm this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 05:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020559.n125xxla011867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 --- Comment #21 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-02-02 00:59:54 EDT --- I have taken over this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 06:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020601.n1261qbN019264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-02 01:01:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I think those Requires is ok as I see its been used by > MooseX-Method-0.43/lib/MooseX/Test/Parameter/Moose.pm Agreed. These perl(Test::*)'s seem to be in use. > Yes. For me also following provides looks to be removed. > Provides: perl(Foo1) perl(Foo2) perl(Foo3) perl(Foo::Parameter) perl(Foo::Role) Also agreed. These seem bogus to me. Please filter them out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 06:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020621.n126LoHL016416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 01:21:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1098612 - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. python-fiat.src: W: invalid-license LGPL+ python-fiat.noarch: W: no-documentation python-fiat.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL+ + source files match upstream url cc53f9d567ed71929cf94a9a83f3a027 FIAT-0.3.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + no %doc files present to install. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions 1) License tag should be LGPLv2+ as described in Licensing page as "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL. " 2) you should ask upstream to include license text file in next upstream release. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361701] Package review: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020707.n12772AR031207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #17 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-02 02:07:00 EDT --- Yes, I am. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020713.n127DJ48026105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 02:13:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1098610 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a1132fb7694d0b97ebc262fdda798615 FErari-0.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %doc files not present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestion: 1) you should ask upstream to include license text in next upstream release. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020736.n127aNwQ004700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 02:36:22 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1098608 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 279884a0ad84ac4b1de3fc54fccf5984 instant-0.9.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %doc files not present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions: 1) you can consider adding tests to %doc. This will make rpmlint unhappy to make it happy APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020735.n127Z3Wl030940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #25 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-02-02 02:35:01 EDT --- Very good catch ! I investigated in the buildsystem, and it seems the spring devs purposefully ignore the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS env vars. In the configure step, these messages are printed: WARNING: attempt to use environment CFLAGS has been ignored. WARNING: attempt to use environment CXXFLAGS has been ignored. And in the build script "rts/build/scons/rts.py", line 366: # Do not do this [use env vars] anymore because it may severely mess up our carefully selected options. # Print a warning and ignore them instead. So I don't think I should patch the buildsystem to use Fedora's flags if upstream has purposefully decided not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 07:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020737.n127bHW2004890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 02:37:16 EDT --- ah I missed to type that make it happy by using following in %prep chmod 644 tests/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020804.n1284f9n010442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 03:04:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-instant Short Description: Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020803.n12832fn004749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 03:03:01 EDT --- Good point, thanks. I will add the test stuff before cvs import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020809.n1289XEv011510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 03:09:31 EDT --- It is against Fedora's policy and it must be fixed. Especially debug option -g is not passed so debuginfo rpm is not complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020807.n12871Pw011291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020818.n128Icwd013642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 03:18:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-ferari Short Description: Optimizer for finite element code Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020820.n128KSqh008714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 03:20:27 EDT --- Thanks for the explanation about the licenses. I will fix this before cvs import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020817.n128HkBS007920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 03:17:45 EDT --- I'm in contact with upstream that's not the only issue at the moment because these guys provides more than one package ;-) . At the moment I'm trying to bring the foundation in the Fedora Package Collection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020821.n128L5hJ008841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 03:21:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-fiat Short Description: Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020832.n128WhfA011214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #6 from Ivan Efremov 2009-02-02 03:32:42 EDT --- In fact, there is also a serious question about using macros in '%files' section. UGENE build system is based on makefiles generated with qmake. The point is that qmake has not command line options for specifying different installation paths for different files (something like --bindir, --libdir etc.) - these paths are preconfigured in a configuration file (src/ugene_globals.pri). As long as default rpm macros values are identical to preconfigured paths everything goes OK, but when they are not - rpm build will fail. In fact, the main problem will be with %{_libdir} since on 64bit platforms it may be changed from /usr/lib to /usr/lib64. Is there any workaround for this problem (e.g. using hardoced libdir path)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 08:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020853.n128rlIZ015396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-02 03:53:44 EDT --- I'll look at it later but in the meanwhile no, I didn't revoque my approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020901.n1291Gis017340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-02-02 04:01:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > (You can reuse the variables MUSIXTEXDIR etc). > I couldn't use them because rpmbuild fails when a %files entry doesn't start > with "/". News to me. I guess this is because they are variables and not rpm macros and in another section of the rpm spec. You could walk around this by declaring these variables as macros and using them as such, e.g. %define musixtexdir %{_texmf_main}/tex/generic/%{texname} and then using %{musixtexdir} instead of $MUSIXTEXDIR The only reason I would insist on that is for consistency reasons, so you could either: a) drop the variables alltogether, or b) change them to macros, so that you can re-use them at the %files section I am ok with all the other issues, and this is a style issue, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020909.n1299TIA025093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-02 04:09:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PerlIO-gzip Short Description: Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020909.n1299Vhl019427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020926.n129QMjX029445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|paskalis at di.uoa.gr |oget.fedora at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020924.n129OXYj023536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #27 from MERCIER 2009-02-02 04:24:31 EDT --- where i can i find a sponsor? i have creat some package: Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 Modern background: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 09:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902020927.n129R5HN024455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-02 04:27:03 EDT --- I've got a response from the celt maintainer here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/celt-dev/2009-February/000063.html He's confirmed the license on all the files is BSD and will update them in the repo. Is there anything else outstanding for this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021008.n12A8Qqw007989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-02 05:08:24 EDT --- As per your patch on IRC, this should be fixed by mingw32-filesystem >= 46. Here is a Koji scratch-build which succeeds in F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1098760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021007.n12A7O9O002670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-02 05:07:23 EDT --- OK, this is APPROVED. Before committing can you make two changes to the spec file: (1) Put README into %doc in the -devel subpackage. (2) Put a comment in the spec file with the link in comment 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483540] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483540 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-Net-Stomp.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-Net-Stomp-0.34-1.el5.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to write a Stomp client. Stomp, the Streaming Text Orientated Messaging Protocol, is a simple and easy to implement protocol for working with Message Orientated Middleware. Net::Stomp is can be used to communicate with Apache ActiveMQ, an enterprise-level Java Message Service 1.1 (JMS) message broker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021014.n12AEaP2009531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-02 05:14:34 EDT --- Thanks Richard, Will update both of those before commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021013.n12AD4PO009258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-02 05:13:03 EDT --- Builded in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021020.n12AKlSn011286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-02 05:20:45 EDT --- Ok, i'll fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021018.n12AIp7B005459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-02 05:18:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: celt Short Description: An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication Owners: pbrobinson xiphmont Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021039.n12AdH61015533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 --- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-02 05:39:16 EDT --- Please update fedora-review flag :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021045.n12AjXFH017251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #28 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-02-02 05:45:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > where i can i find a sponsor? > i have creat some package: > Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager/*/sponsor You should be able to see them with your Fedora account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] New: Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Summary: Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anithra at linux.vnet.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/SystemTapGuiServer.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/SystemTapGuiServer-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: SystemtapGui is a tool being developed to assist in writing SystemTap scripts and viewing kernel performance.This package installs the server side of SystemtapGui -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 10:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021047.n12AlqbC012426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 11:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021104.n12B4w0Q016944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-02 06:04:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > > 1) Is anyone going to make a full review for this + sponsoring the packager? > > I unfortunately don't believe due to packaging policies that songbird can be > included until it can be compiled against the Fedora xulrunner rather than its > own. We are definitely not expecting songbird to use the "vanilla" libxul in order to be acceptable. (even thunderbird use it owns libxul, and it is very important for the songbird fedora package maintainer to look at how the thunderbird package is done. Specially about how to filter the provides of the internal libxul) BUT, using the system libxul should be doable at some later point. I will forward an email to remi who could do the final review and sponsorship (specially as he's experienced in mozilla apps packaging). Hence, I could assist him with a preliminary review. @David you seems to have done a release: 2, but the corresponding srpm isn't here. Can you implement the contribs dependencies source package to be smaller, as requested in #c20 ? I will start review then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 11:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021124.n12BOOZO022374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-02 06:24:23 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 11:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021128.n12BSqvV023497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 11:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021143.n12BhZja032113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-02 06:43:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Iterator Short Description: Iterate over collections Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 11:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481288] Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021148.n12BmD7m028546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-02-02 06:48:12 EDT --- Yep, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 12:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483540] Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021206.n12C6bdq005671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483540 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-02 07:06:35 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [!] Spec file is legible and written in American English. => note 1 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 19585101a90249ec972ec529d74594d6d2f7beee Net-Stomp-0.34.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ===Notes=== 1. please use: "Net::Stomp can be used to communicate with Apache ActiveMQ, an enterprise-level Java Message Service 1.1 (JMS) message broker." as the last phrase in %Description ("is can" is not correct) ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 12:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021208.n12C8tJQ006067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-02 07:08:54 EDT --- REVIEW: - You packaged relatively old version - 0.13, although they released v 0.16. - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at host-12-116 SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/Desktop/mpdscribble-0.13-1.fc10.* mpdscribble.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.13.1 ['0.13-1.fc10', '0.13-1'] 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at host-12-116 SPECS] Please use %{version}-%{release} w/o .fc10 suffix in %changelog. For example, if %{version} is 0.13 and release is 1%{?dist} you should use 0.13-1 as version tag in %changelog. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. +/- The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. After brief chacking, I found only one *possible* issue - this package ships (and was built against) libmpdclient library ( http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/ClientLib:libmpdclient ). The Guidelines has statement that we must avoid using such libraries if they already exists in system. This library, libmpdclient still not included in main Fedora repository (therefore it doesn't a problem), however it might be included in the future (and will be a problem). You should watch this issue. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s), is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at host-12-116 SOURCES]$ md5sum mpdscribble-0.13.tar.gz* 884717131356ad2f62918d458258b443 mpdscribble-0.13.tar.gz 884717131356ad2f62918d458258b443 mpdscribble-0.13.tar.gz.from_srpm [petro at host-12-116 SOURCES]$ + The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1098823 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No need to handle locales. + No shared library files. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + No header files + No static libraries + No pkgconfig(.pc) files + No library files with a suffix + No devel packages + No .la libtool archives + Not a GUI application + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. So here are my suggestions: * update srpm to latest 0.16 (or explain why you won't do it). * fix %changelog versioning entry * consider packaging libmpdclient also (not a blocker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 12:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 07:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021253.n12CrDeX016918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-02 07:53:11 EDT --- any news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021303.n12D321a019459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|oget.fedora at gmail.com |paskalis at di.uoa.gr --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 08:03:00 EDT --- (Please keep the assignee to the reviewer) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] New: Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/1.5.26-7.fc10/mingw32-libltdl.spec SRPM URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/1.5.26-7.fc10/mingw32-libltdl-1.5.26-7.fc10.src.rpm Description: The mingw32-libltdl package contains the GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader, a library that provides a consistent, portable interface which simplifies the process of using dynamic modules, for the mingw32 cross compilation environment. These runtime libraries are needed by programs that link directly to the system-installed ltdl libraries; they are not needed by software built using the rest of the GNU Autotools (including GNU Autoconf and GNU Automake). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021308.n12D8MPc021053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-02 08:08:21 EDT --- FYI: When I publish updates to this package in the course of this review, they will be published here: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/ http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/mingw32-libltdl-package.git;a=summary git://fedorapeople.org/~ndim/mingw32-libltdl-package.git -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021313.n12DDlCu022813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 08:13:46 EDT --- Looks Like I missed this to review after assigning myself. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099011 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d1f92a8c14584d45b12d31e5ed942d4c Test-Dynamic-1.3.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.27 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Dynamic-1.3.3-3.fc11 -> Provides: perl(Test::Dynamic) = 1.3.3 Requires: perl >= 0:5.008003 perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021321.n12DLCsi019881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021326.n12DQejd021294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-02 08:26:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Dynamic Short Description: Automatic test counting for Test::More Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483557] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483557 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig/perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig/perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This role loads simple configfiles to set object attributes. It is based on the abstract role MooseX::ConfigFromFile, and uses Config::Any to load your configfile. Config::Any will in turn support any of a variety of different config formats, detected by the file extension. See Config::Any for more details about supported formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:38:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021338.n12DchGM024029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 08:38:42 EDT --- Is there a new Source RPM somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021345.n12Dj3RN031116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-02 08:44:59 EDT --- Ping! Jima, are you still interested in maintaining this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:50:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021350.n12Doxsp032647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 13:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021350.n12Dowvv032621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-libltdl --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-02 08:50:57 EDT --- A Koji scratch build would help here to validate that there are no missing dependencies, and that it actually builds in the somewhat harsh environment of mock/koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021406.n12E62lp004382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 --- Comment #4 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-02-02 09:06:01 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I've added a comment how to get sources from git (by cloning the repo). Fixed files: Spec URL: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/nautilus-gdu/nautilus-gdu.spec SRPM URL: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/nautilus-gdu/nautilus-gdu-0.1-git20090130.1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483569] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483569 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object/perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object/perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides Moose type constraints (see Moose::Util::TypeConstraints, MooseX::Types). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021414.n12EEAW7006269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-02-02 09:14:09 EDT --- New version of the gem was released today, so the SRPM and spec have been updated: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-rufus-scheduler.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-rufus-scheduler-1.0.13-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021414.n12EE6ev000779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-02 09:14:05 EDT --- Updated versions: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/1.5.26-9.fc10/ http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/1.5.26-8.fc10/ For detailed changes, cf. the mingw32-libltdl.spec files, or see the gitweb interface. Koji scratch builds complete successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099167 (1.5.26-9.fc10) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099134 (1.5.26-8.fc10) %changelog * Mon Feb 2 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 1.5.26-9 - remove obsolete requires(post/pre) - remove mingw32-gcc-c++ requirement * Mon Feb 2 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 1.5.26-8 - Call configure with --host instead of setting CC and CXX. - Use BuildArch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021420.n12EK0gZ007748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 --- Comment #4 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-02 09:19:59 EDT --- Koji scratch build of mingw32-libltdl-1.5.26-9.fc10 for dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021423.n12ENrN6008976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-02 09:23:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Is the camel casing necessary in the name? Just curious ... > > Its not really necessary, but is there just for the sake of uniformity as > SystemTap also has camel casing. $ rpm -q systemtap systemtap-0.8-1.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021427.n12ER2Gq010062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 09:27:00 EDT --- For optional dependency: - I don't know how debian deals with dependency, however as rpm does not have Requires(hint) or so, package maintainer must judge whether to add such optional dependency to explicit Requires or not. Fedora's default policy is to support as much functionality in the software as possible (and usually it tends to add more dependency to the software). However the actual judgment is left to the maintainer, so if you have some reason you don't want to add python-pydns to explicit Requires, I don't object against it (but please write a brief comment in pymilter spec file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021438.n12Ecl2A012846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Alias| |libfli -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021438.n12EcXwN007333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Alias| |libindi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021440.n12EexpV008175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #4 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-02-02 09:40:58 EDT --- Yes, I forgot to add them. Spec file URL is unchanged: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021444.n12EiI9j008805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwilson at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-02-02 09:44:17 EDT --- Jarod, can you look if it helps to build IRMAN support in fedora's lirc package? I also can create another bug for lirc and help to add IRMAN support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021447.n12El8b5015219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-02 09:47:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > As far as I can see, the Review Guideline say "if (and only if)...". I admit > that my English is not so good, but I do not think that my understanding of > "and only if" is wrong... Is there a special meaning due to the fact that those > three words are in parenthesizes ? Hmm, I can see how that is unclear. As the author of those words, I can assure you that this is what I intended them to mean: When the source package includes the text of the license(s) in separate file(s), then that file or files, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. If they are not present, the package maintainer may add copies of the licenses in the Fedora package, but is not required to do so. However, in such cases, the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake. ^^^ Does that make things clearer? If so, I'll propose the change to FPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:48:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483540] Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021448.n12EmFPs009900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483540 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-02 09:48:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. please use: > "Net::Stomp can be used to communicate with Apache ActiveMQ, an > enterprise-level Java Message Service 1.1 (JMS) message broker." as the last > phrase in %Description ("is can" is not correct) Good catch! Thanks for the review (I'll address the wording issue during the import). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Stomp Short Description: Stomp client module for Perl Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021452.n12Eq2ZB016431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 --- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-02 09:52:01 EDT --- Minimal change since last koji scratch build, so I did not do another one: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/1.5.26-10.fc10/ * Mon Feb 2 2009 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 1.5.26-10 - fix license: only consider content of binary RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021452.n12Eq4ix016475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-02 09:52:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Demos are not included in the rpm. Does that still count ? They are however in the SRPM, and the case of the NVIDIA bits, it is not clear that we have permission to redistribute them. You'll need to make a modified tarball. The SCEA license is Free but GPL incompatible. Use "SCEA" for the License tag. I'm going to lift FE-Legal, assuming that Mamoru will ensure the tarball is clean before approving it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] New: Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 Summary: Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/dissy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/dissy-8-1.el5.src.rpm Description: Dissy is a graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler, it can be used for debugging and browsing compiler-generated code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 14:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021458.n12Ewc3R012982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 09:58:36 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing the license, spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:03:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: Modern desktop background In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021503.n12F3l7G020185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Modern background |Review Request: Modern | |desktop background -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481725] Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F58kQ020760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F59Bw020782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Bug 481727 depends on bug 481725, which changed state. Bug 481725 Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F5Cj5020886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481725, which changed state. Bug 481725 Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F59BQ020805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Bug 481734 depends on bug 481725, which changed state. Bug 481725 Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F5ApR020829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Bug 481738 depends on bug 481725, which changed state. Bug 481725 Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F5Bxr020861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Bug 481759 depends on bug 481725, which changed state. Bug 481725 Summary: Review Request: python-setupdocs - Setuptools plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475037] Review Request: stardict-dic-hi - Hindi Dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021505.n12F55MG014922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475037 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021504.n12F47Xv014454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Desktop | Summary|A collection of quotes in |Review Request: A |French for gdesklets |collection of quotes in | |French for gdesklets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021507.n12F7MdK015581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-02-02 10:07:21 EDT --- Hello, Jochen python-setuptools is available now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021513.n12FDLnJ023357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-02 10:13:20 EDT --- Files don't contain licensing information, only the COPYING file with text of GPLv2 is included. Upstream was contacted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021518.n12FIXHs018633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021526.n12FQfd1026671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 10:26:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330633) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330633) Maybe-needed additional dependencies Almost clean Some notes: * Directory for installing icon - spe.png should be installed under %_datadir/pixmaps, not under %_datadir/icons. * Optional dependency - There seems other optional dependencies (see attached) Would you check if "Requires: pygame, python-quixote" should be needed (or is preferable) or they are just optional? Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021525.n12FPM1k020616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-02 10:25:20 EDT --- most of the things fixed here. http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.23-1.fc10.src.rpm ----------------- koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099426 but I am still don't understand why you trying to say about HOWTO file. #install doc about alternatives install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} ---------------------------------------------------------- - Well, even in %prep after %setup -q is finished, the working directory is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} for this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021539.n12FdVsN023676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-02 10:39:29 EDT --- Remarks: * According to book of Black Magic, called "Packaging Guidelines", you shouldn't use tags "Vendor" and "Packager". I suggest you to remove them both. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Tags * Please, drop condition which checks for debian. * Add "%define debug_package %{nil}" on top of your spec to disallow creating useless debuginfo sub-package (see http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/erlang-pgsql/devel/erlang-pgsql.spec?view=markup as an example). * No need to explicitly define directory to unpack to in %prep section. I mean that "%setup" (or, better, "%setup -q") would be enough. * You're using make w/o %{?_smp_mflags} switch. Does rabbitmq-server support parallel make? If not, then you should add note (see %build section it this spec-file - http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ejabberd/devel/ejabberd.spec?view=markup ) I'll suggest some improvements later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021542.n12FgwB4030923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 --- Comment #8 from Tadej Jane? 2009-02-02 10:42:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The license text may be found at the end of the README file. If you need it to > be in a separate file I grant you permission to copy it there. Fedora project would like to encourage you as the author of webunit to move the license text from the end of the README file to a seperate file (e.g. COPYING). You should make that change upstream (in the provided source at http://www.mechanicalcat.net/tech/webunit/webunit-%{version}.tar.gz). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 15:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021549.n12Fn2j9025896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 10:49:01 EDT --- Again I have not checked your srpm at all, however: (In reply to comment #15) > but I am still don't understand why you trying to say about HOWTO file. > > > #install doc about alternatives > install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} > ---------------------------------------------------------- > - Well, even in %prep after %setup -q is finished, the working directory > is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{base_version} for this case. I am saying that ---------------------------------------------------- #install doc about alternatives install -Dp -m 644 %{SOURCE1} . ---------------------------------------------------- is simpler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021600.n12G0sa5028786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 11:00:53 EDT --- Assigning to myself. I tried to remove all files under NVIDIA license and Demos/ directory and this still builds. So license issue is now gone. I will try a full review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021602.n12G2mPP003620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021602.n12G2FXa003559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-02 11:02:14 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021609.n12G9NMo030725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-02 11:09:20 EDT --- Closing as now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021611.n12GBCA0031405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-02 11:11:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will switch those to macros. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tex-musixtex Short Description: Sophisticated music typesetting Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021609.n12G9Ohc030758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 467405, which changed state. Bug 467405 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467416 depends on bug 467376, which changed state. Bug 467376 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021616.n12GGoXc032517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-02 11:16:49 EDT --- General comments: . You shouldn't need --host parameter to configure. . It would be nice if the make check rule was surrounded by %if %{run_tests} ... %endif, and if it worked when run_tests was enabled. (run_tests should be disabled by default though). See how we do it here: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/9ce8bc84c7bc/gmp/mingw32-gmp.spec#l7 + rpmlint output mingw32-libltdl.src:56: W: configure-without-libdir-spec Weird one - we set --libdir in the mingw32_configure macro so I'm not sure what rpmlint is talking about. Ignore it. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file n/a packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages n/a %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ===> APPROVED but it would be nice to see the two changes I point out at the top. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021617.n12GHLq0032679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 --- Comment #22 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-02-02 11:17:18 EDT --- I should have some time in the next week or two to move this forward a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:25:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:25:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] New: Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 Summary: Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: Need hosting space SRPM URL: Need hosting space Description: CodeAnalyst is a performance analysis suite. It provids graphical utilitys for running Oprofile, and analyzing result on AMD-based systems. CodeAnalyst includes several features to aid profile analysis such as inline-function analysis, code-block analysis, and a utility for profile comparison, DiffAnalayst. This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483569] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021624.n12GOS0s008507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483569 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 11:24:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099489 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 91ca075f77cd9922e36a100c59b6f383 MooseX-Types-Set-Object-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=1, Tests=15, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.32 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.35 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object-0.02-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(MooseX::Types::Set::Object) = 0.02 Requires: perl(MooseX::Types) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Set::Object) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483557] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021624.n12GOwEX001723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483557 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 11:24:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099483 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6aacecf18afbf17f97e666c0197a5e18 MooseX-SimpleConfig-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=3, Tests=12, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 1.62 cusr 0.10 csys = 1.75 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig-0.03-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(MooseX::SimpleConfig) = 0.03 Requires: perl(Config::Any) perl(Moose::Role) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021626.n12GQnWc009215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #17 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-02 11:26:48 EDT --- please look this version when you have time. http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.23-2.fc10.src.rpm --------- koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:30:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:30:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483557] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021630.n12GUpoZ010025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483557 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-02 11:30:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig Short Description: Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile), FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021631.n12GV23v003413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021631.n12GVFmD003457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: CodeAnalyst |Review Request: CodeAnalyst |- Performance Analysis |- Performance Analysis |Suite for AMD-based System |Suite for AMD-based System |(based on Oprofile), |(based on Oprofile) |FE-NEEDSPONSOR | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483569] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021629.n12GTaib002769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483569 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-02 11:29:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object Short Description: Set::Object type with coercions and stuff Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile), FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021626.n12GQwr2002438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: CodeAnalyst |Review Request: CodeAnalyst |- Performance Analysis |- Performance Analysis |Suite for AMD-based System |Suite for AMD-based System |(based on Oprofile) |(based on Oprofile), | |FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483620] New: Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483620 Summary: Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atkac at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libbind.spec SRPM URL: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libbind-6.0-0.1.b1.fc11.src.rpm libbind was part of bind package but upstream has splitted libbind to separate tarball. Thus it makes sence to split it to separate package. Note about man pages - most of them currently conflict with glibc's manual pages so I removed them. (they are same as glibc's) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021642.n12GgCep012916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 --- Comment #8 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-02 11:42:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > General comments: > > . You shouldn't need --host parameter to configure. Removed in mingw32-libltdl-1.5.26-11.fc10 > . It would be nice if the make check rule was surrounded by > %if %{run_tests} ... %endif, and if it worked when run_tests > was enabled. (run_tests should be disabled by default though). Added in mingw32-libltdl-1.5.26-11.fc10 > ===> APPROVED > but it would be nice to see the two changes I point out at the top. Done: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/mingw32-libltdl/1.5.26-11.fc10/ http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/mingw32-libltdl-package.git;a=summary Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021646.n12GkQbC007368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-02 11:46:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libltdl Short Description: Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader Owners: ndim Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483625] New: Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483625 Summary: Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-pt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-pt-0.20060817-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Portuguese thesaurus as usable by OpenOffice.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021653.n12GraYw009016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-02 11:53:35 EDT --- Oh, yes, it's definitely more clear. And it has a different meaning than what I have understood from it. Although I still find a bit awkward... Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) => see also note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: cd82796797be1aba3e9102af9a3023feada104c6 Schedule-Cron-Events-1.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English la nguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Note: I still recommend dropping the BR on perl> 5.8.0. Both Fedora and RHEL 4/5 have much newer versions. Your call. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 16:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021658.n12GwDYW010053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-02 11:58:11 EDT --- Bruno, would you tell me if files under Extras/ are really needed? I tried to remove all files under Gemos/ Extras/ Glut/ and it still builds with %cmake . -DBUILD_DEMOS=OFF -DBUILD_EXTRAS=OFF -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021706.n12H6Uux012027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #10 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-02 12:06:29 EDT --- Maybe approved but we've still the legal blocker regarding *.plx. I will clarify this first before any CVS import - if upstream replies to me. Tom, would it also be suitable not to ship the *.plx in the binary RPM, but just in the SRPM package? Or would I have to remove the *.plx then from the tarball as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021704.n12H4u08011405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 12:04:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099565 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2e48d6fec7c02c0e62a568a7e56ea374 dissy-8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. Suggestion: 1) You still need following %if 0%{?fedora} > 8 %{python_sitelib}/*.egg-info %endif I will say drop this if-endif as F8 is EOL. and let there be only egg-info line. 2) Add correct BR:python-setuptools-devel for egg-info as per given at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483625] Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021702.n12H2Hg1017388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483625 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021702.n12H2qsO011173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-02 12:02:51 EDT --- oh well, note 1 would have said (if I wouldn't pasted over the selection): "do not forget to ask upstream to include the licenses" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021706.n12H6s2c012166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-02 12:06:53 EDT --- Good: + Koji build works fine. + Local build works fine. + Local install works fine. + Local uninstall works fine. Bad: - Rpmlint complaints on binary package $ rpmlint python-AppTools-3.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm python-AppTools.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/enthought/help/attic/BSSCDefault.h python-AppTools.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/enthought/help/attic/EnLibHelp.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - this is not a blocker in my view - I have found a docs/html.zip file. it may be nice, if you may unzip it and install it in the %doc stanza - The same you should do for the examples directory. - During a simple test I will get the following error messages: $ python examples/appscripting/example.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "examples/appscripting/example.py", line 20, in from enthought.pyface.api import GUI, YES ImportError: No module named pyface.api -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483625] Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021716.n12HGJYK020458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483625 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 12:16:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099624 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2fa9a6845405ebb574c2f82a5cddbcbf thes_pt_PT_v2.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483625] Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021720.n12HKK5Q021270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483625 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-02 12:20:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-pt Short Description: Portuguese thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483628] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Geo-IPfree/perl-Geo-IPfree.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Geo-IPfree/perl-Geo-IPfree-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package comes with it's own database to look up the IP's country, and is totally free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 17:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021755.n12HtaUo021960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-02 12:55:35 EDT --- Well, given that we don't know if we have permission to redistribute the .plx file or not, I'm going to say that you need a modified tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:13:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483641] New: Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483641 Summary: Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Date-Tiny/perl-Date-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Date-Tiny/perl-Date-Tiny-1.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Date::Tiny is a member of the DateTime::Tiny suite of time modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021813.n12IDBdJ025999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Modern |Review Request: |desktop background |earth-and-moon desktop | |background theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021833.n12IXnG2004582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #26 from David Halik 2009-02-02 13:33:47 EDT --- @kwizart Thanks for the help. I'm looking at some of the suggestions you posted as well as trimming down the tarball. I'll post revision 3 soon with the changes and updated src rpm. Once that happens having remi look it over would definitely be beneficial. Let me work on it a bit first before we move forward. @Nikolay /usr/bin/songbird is just a sym link to songbird-bin, but it appears as though I missed the scriplet that you pointed out. Songbird should ideally be run with /usr/lib/songbird-1.0.0/songbird which in turn runs songbird-bin and sets up the dependency paths properly. libjemalloc is provided by the patched internal xulrunner, but it looks as if running the binary directly causes songbird to look for the dependency on the system, not in the songbird root. If xulrunner is not installed it then breaks. Thanks for pointing this out. Songbird running against the system xulrunner is not a good idea since all the internal fixes Songbird relies upon are missing. I'll fix this in the upcoming release I mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483400] Review Request: vollkorn-fonts - A serif latin OTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021845.n12IjcZo001164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483400 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 18:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021845.n12Ijx7Y001248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 19:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:04:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483649] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Workers/perl-MooseX-Workers.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Workers/perl-MooseX-Workers-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MooseX::Workers is a Role that provides easy delegation of long-running tasks into a managed child process. Process managment is taken care of via POE and it's POE::Wheel::Run module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 19:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902021916.n12JGrNh008285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #1 from suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.com 2009-02-02 14:16:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-2.8.37-1.fc10/CodeAnalyst.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-2.8.37-1.fc10/CodeAnalyst-2.8.37-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 20:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483657] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483657 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor/perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor/perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class does not provide any methods. Just loading it changes the default naming policy for the package so that accessors are separated into get and set methods. The get methods have the same name as the accessor, while set methods are prefixed with "set_". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 20:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022039.n12KdXUk002533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 --- Comment #5 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-02 15:39:32 EDT --- Ralf, I respectfully disagree. Please reference https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership "Directory ownership is a little more complex than file ownership. Although the rule of thumb is the same: own all the directories you create but none of the directories of packages you depend on, there are several instances where it's desirable for multiple packages to own a directory. Examples of this are:" None of the examples provided appear to be applicable to this set of packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 20:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022046.n12Kk0eO004105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-02 15:45:58 EDT --- Bah, I didn't have a close look at the Perl guidelines, sorry. It's still rather confusing, but appears to be permissible for the perl directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Directory_Ownership for those following along at home :) The comment still stands about %{_sysconfdir}/nocpulse, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 20:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483663] New: Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663 Summary: Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tetgen.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tetgen-1.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://tetgen.berlios.de/ Description: TetGen generates the Delaunay tetrahedralization, Voronoi diagram, constrained Delaunay tetrahedralizations and quality tetrahedral meshes. The main goal of TetGen is to generate suitable meshes for solving partial differential equations by finite element or finite volume methods. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099998 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint tet* tetgen-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint tetgen-1.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 21:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022112.n12LCrNO010497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Pavel Shevchuk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Pavel Shevchuk 2009-02-02 16:12:52 EDT --- Spec imported to cvs, packages built in koji. Thanks Lucian and Kevin, i appreciate your help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 21:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022140.n12Le3AE007789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-02 16:40:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: giver Short Description: A simple file sharing desktop application Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 21:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022152.n12LqR29018702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-02 16:52:25 EDT --- rpmlint output: ----------------------------------------------------- mingw32-openssl.src:154: W: make-check-outside-check-section #patch33 is applied after make test mingw32-openssl.src:262: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build # fips/fips_standalone_sha1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/libcrypto.so.%{version} >$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/.libcrypto.so.%{version}.hmac \ mingw32-openssl.src:263: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build # ln -sf .libcrypto.so.%{version}.hmac $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/.libcrypto.so.%{soversion}.hmac \ mingw32-openssl.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch33: openssl-0.9.8j-ca-dir.patch mingw32-openssl.src: W: strange-permission make-dummy-cert 0755 mingw32-openssl.src: W: strange-permission hobble-openssl 0755 ----------------------------------------------------- all these output are the same as native package or commented out and can be ignored. [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [*] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [*] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %i install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [/] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [/] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [*] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. =================================================== The package mingw32-openssl is approved by lfarkas =================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 22:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] New: Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! Alias: perl-App-Asciio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Asciio OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-App-Asciio.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-App-Asciio-1.02.71-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This gtk2-perl application allows you to draw ASCII diagrams in a modern (but simple) graphical application. The ASCII graphs can be saved as ASCII or in a format that allows you to modify them later. This package contains the back-end libraries needed to implement asciio. For the actual gui app itself, please install the 'asciio' package. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1100189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022338.n12NcISG030462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) --- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl 2009-02-02 18:38:15 EDT --- Patrice, are you gone for good, even for this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022342.n12NgW5t008042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-02 18:42:30 EDT --- 1. you have a typo in you -common description 2. \ after %common_desc in book description is probably unnecessary Otherwise this looks like a very fine package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022354.n12NslPp010314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #6 from MERCIER 2009-02-02 18:54:47 EDT --- 4/ i have some package on review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 i continue tomorow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022353.n12Nr5Zj010196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #5 from MERCIER 2009-02-02 18:53:03 EDT --- In first, thanks for your answer, _______________________________________________________________ 1/ i have update the summary as "Python IDE with UML,PyChecker,Debugger,GUI design,Blender & more" _______________________________________________________________ 2/in tar file they are a shortcuts directories: _spe/shortcuts/ this directories i can remove it in the spec file? > rm -rf ./_spe/shortcuts/ _______________________________________________________________ 3/ i look all import from .py file, left 3 diorecotries(tabs,test ans view) setup.py from distutils.core import setup _spe/Child.py import codecs, compiler, inspect, os, sys, re, shutil, thread, time, types import wx from wx.lib.evtmgr import eventManager import sm, sm.osx, sm.spy, sm.uml, sm.wxp, sm.wxp.smdi from sm.wxp.stc import PythonSTC from sm.wxp.realtime import TreeCtrl, ListCtrl import view.documentation import _spe.help as help from Menu import STATUS import _spe.plugins.Pycheck as Pycheck from sidebar.Browser import Browser _spe/help.py import _spe.info _spe/info.py import os,sys _spe/Menu.py import _spe.info as info _spe/Parent.py import _spe.info as info _spe/spe import _spe.SPE _spe/SPE.py import sys _spe/SPE.pyw import SPE _spe/spe_blender.py import _spe.SPE _spe/SPE_DEBUG.py import _spe.SPE import sys _spe/winpdb_blender.py import os import sys import subprocess _spe/wxgChild.py import wx _spe/wxgMenu.py import sys, wx _spe/dialogs/helpDialog.py import os _spe/dialogs/helpShortcutsDialog.py import _spe.info _spe/dialogs/__init__.py import _spe.info _spe/dialogs/preferencesDialog.py import ConfigParser,os,types from wx.gizmos import EditableListBox import wx import sm.wxp.smdi as smdi _spe/dialogs/runDialog.py import wx _spe/dialogs/runTerminalDialog.py import wx _spe/dialogs/runWinPdbDialog.py import wx _spe/dialogs/separatorDialog.py import _spe.info,sm _spe/dialogs/speDialog.py import _spe.info _spe/dialogs/stcStyleEditor.py import os, string, pprint, copy import ConfigParser import wx from wx.lib.anchors import LayoutAnchors import wx.stc as wx_stc _spe/dialogs/winpdbDialog.py import wx import os,webbrowser import _spe.info as info _spe/doc/home.py import webbrowser _spe/plugins/__init__.py import _spe.info _spe/plugins/Pycheck.py import os import wx from wx.lib.evtmgr import eventManager import _spe.info as info _spe/plugins/spe_winpdb.py import os, thread import wx import _spe.info as info import _spe.Menu as Menu from dialogs import winpdbDialog _spe/plugins/spe_xrced.py import os, sys from wx.tools.XRCed import xrced from plugins.XRCed import xrced _spe/plugins/kiki/kiki.py import wx import wx.html import re, os, os.path, cgi, sys _spe/plugins/pychecker/checker.py import string import types import sys import imp import os import glob import traceback import re _spe/plugins/pychecker/CodeChecks.py import string import types _spe/plugins/pychecker/Config.py import sys import os import getopt import string import re import time import types _spe/plugins/pychecker/__init__.py import string _spe/plugins/pychecker/msgs.py import UserString _spe/plugins/pychecker/options.py import sys import os import Tkinter, tkFileDialog from OptionTypes import * from string import capitalize, strip, rstrip, split _spe/plugins/pychecker/OptionTypes.py import Tkinter _spe/plugins/pychecker/printer.py from pychecker import utils _spe/plugins/pychecker/python.py import types import sys _spe/plugins/pychecker/Stack.py import types _spe/plugins/pychecker/utils.py import sys import string import copy _spe/plugins/pychecker/Warning.py import os.path import sys import string import types import traceback import imp import re _spe/plugins/pychecker2/Check.py import time import os import stat _spe/plugins/pychecker2/ClassChecks.py from compiler.misc import mangle from compiler import ast, walk _spe/plugins/pychecker2/ConditionalChecks.py from compiler import ast, walk _spe/plugins/pychecker2/File.py from compiler import ast _spe/plugins/pychecker2/FormatStringChecks.py from compiler import ast, walk from types import * import re _spe/plugins/pychecke2r/ImportChecks.py from compiler import walk _spe/plugins/pychecker2/main.py import sys from os.path import dirname, realpath _spe/plugins/pychecker2/OpChecks.py import compiler _spe/plugins/pychecker2/ParseChecks.py from compiler import parseFile, walk import parser _spe/plugins/pychecker2/ReachableChecks.py from compiler import ast, walk _spe/plugins/pychecker2/ReturnChecks.py from compiler import ast, walk _spe/plugins/pychecker2/ScopeChecks.py from compiler.ast import * _spe/plugins/pychecker2/symbols.py from compiler import ast from compiler.consts import SC_LOCAL, SC_GLOBAL, SC_FREE, SC_CELL, SC_UNKNOWN from compiler.misc import mangle import types import sys _spe/plugins/pychecker2/test.py import os import sys import unittest import glob _spe/plugins/pychecker2/test.py import unittest _spe/plugins/pychecker2/TestSupport.py import unittest _spe/plugins/pychecker2/VariableChecks.py from compiler import ast, walk _spe/Browser.py import wx import os _spe/sm/images.py import sm _spe/sm/osx.py import os import sm _spe/sm/python.py import sm _spe/sm/scriptutils.py import sm _spe/sm/spy.py import inspect _spe/sm/thread.py import Queue,threading,types,time _spe/sm/uml.py import os, re import wx, wx.lib.ogl as ogl _spe/sm/www.py import sm _spe/sm/wxp/__init__.py import os, types, sys import sm _spe/sm/wxp/NotebookCtrl.py import wx from wx.lib.buttons import GenBitmapButton as BitmapButton import wx.xrc as xrc import cStringIO, zlib import cPickle import weakref _spe/sm/wxp/pil.py import wx import Image _spe/sm/wxp/realtime.py import wx _spe/sm/wxp/singleApp.py import wx import thread import time import sys import wx.lib.newevent import SimpleXMLRPCServer import xmlrpcli _spe/sm/wxp/smdi.py import sm, sm.osx import os, sys, pprint import wx from wx.lib.evtmgr import eventManager import singleApp import NotebookCtrl _spe/sm/wxp/stc.py import sm import wx import wx.stc as wx_stc import wx.gizmos as wx_gizmos import inspect,keyword,os,sys,typ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 2 23:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902022359.n12NxosO001850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-02 18:59:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > My review. I cannot sponsor you as I'm not (yet) an approved packager. > Once this package gets approved contact a sponsor from the official list. Thanks, I don't need a sponsor. > Requires: libcrypt.so.1 (noticed this requirement during build) > To be checked... see below > Good. Wondering if the following line is relevant for the description: > "which is the U.S. government's chosen candidate for the Advanced > Encryption Standard." Your call. I removed some sentences. > Will you be able to fix the build problem on PPC? Otherwise, add a tag to > exclude it. > Via koji I was able to build on ppc. I will exclude ppc64 for the moment. This is my second package with issues about openssl on ppcX. > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > > You need the glibc-devel package for -lcrypt I don't think that I need glibc-devel. The koji log shows that the check for -lcrypt is ok without BR glibc-devel. But maybe I'm mistaken... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1100286&name=build.log Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030003.n1303eoL002986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |- Haskell bindings to the |- Haskell binding to Xft |Xft, X Free Type interface | |library, and some Xrender | |parts | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030035.n130Z3iG008373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | --- Comment #10 from Patrice Dumas 2009-02-02 19:35:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Patrice, are you gone for good, even for this review? No, I am ready to do the review. I am still waiting for an answer to Comment #8, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 00:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030057.n130v1Vn011954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-02 19:57:00 EDT --- Sorry, but this isn't eligible for Fedora. The licence is non-free. You're welcome to try and convince upstream to release it under a free licence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483628] Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030208.n1328Ijx000972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483649] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030208.n1328gEj001044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030208.n1328p2b024482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483649] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030231.n132Vmp4005371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 21:31:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1100468 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 756b0374f889cd9c1898750dabc080f2 MooseX-Workers-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=16, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 1.80 cusr 0.13 csys = 1.94 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Workers-0.04-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(MooseX::Workers) = 0.04 perl(MooseX::Workers::Engine) perl(MooseX::Workers::Engine::PreforkPoe) Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(MooseX::AttributeHelpers) perl(POE) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483628] Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030232.n132WoDq028967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 21:32:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1100452 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8d99f85d42447746c5f94f5d5b70df06 Geo-IPfree-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=12, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) + Package perl-Geo-IPfree-0.4-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(Geo::IPfree) = 0.4 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Memoize) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483657] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030233.n132XCip029025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483657 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-02 21:33:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1100438 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7e0e2733a55f27c98bb3b5503f005de9 MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=4, Tests=8, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.33 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.39 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.02-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(MooseX::Policy::SemiAffordanceAccessor) = 0.02 perl(MooseX::Policy::SemiAffordanceAccessor::Attribute) Requires: perl(Moose) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483696] New: Review Request: libdmapsharing - library for DAAP and DPAP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdmapsharing - library for DAAP and DPAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483696 Summary: Review Request: libdmapsharing - library for DAAP and DPAP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libdmapsharing.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libdmapsharing-1.9.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libdmapsharing implements the DMAP protocols. This includes support for DAAP and DPAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 02:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030258.n132w4Jx009961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 03:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030353.n133rxpJ015608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-02 22:53:58 EDT --- looks good now. approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030409.n1349HZO026805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:09:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030410.n134Ahsc027310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:10:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030416.n134GWR3028782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:16:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030411.n134BwHR027735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:11:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030414.n134E0cH020055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:13:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483557] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030418.n134IlaJ029046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483557 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:18:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483625] Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030420.n134KV5M021619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483625 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:20:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483569] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030419.n134Jf06021107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483569 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:19:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030417.n134HnZf020917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:17:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030421.n134LUn7021739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:21:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030424.n134O4Pd022102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:24:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030422.n134Mpfd021960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:22:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030426.n134QQUb022805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:26:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483461] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030429.n134TOu9031209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483461 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:29:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030427.n134Rcvi030957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:27:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030431.n134VCMH031822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:31:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030430.n134UDCu023838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:30:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030428.n134SXv0023177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:28:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 04:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:32:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483540] Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030432.n134W7lt024200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483540 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-02 23:32:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 05:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030500.n1350Ble029589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 00:00:10 EDT --- Welcome to Fedora Project. You first need to learn Fedora Packaging Guidelines. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines Read this carefully and you will find many changed needed to your SPEC to follow fedora packaging guidelines. Feel free to ask any questions on #fedora-devel on Freenode or fedora-devel mailing list or ask here. Also, you should look into http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored You need to do 2 things 1) submit some more packages with enough packaging quality. 2) start doing pre-reviews of packages from queue http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html Note that as you are not sponsored yet, you should only do unofficial pre-reviews where you only comments review and can not able to accept package. This will ensure that you have got sufficient understanding of rpm packaging and also review process. Don't forget to comment bug numbers here when you do some pre-reviews. Take help of following links while posting reviews. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 05:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:36:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030536.n135a9cT011822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 00:36:08 EDT --- any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 06:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483505] Review Request: perl-PerlIO-gzip - Perl extension to provide a PerlIO layer to gzip/gunzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030628.n136ScHb013980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483505 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-03 01:28:37 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 06:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:33:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030633.n136XrwQ022902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 01:33:52 EDT --- so some of BR are missing for f-10 like BuildRequires: perl(Data::TreeDumper::Renderer::GTK) BuildRequires: perl(Eval::Context) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 07:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030720.n137KZDl024682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-03 02:20:34 EDT --- So they are. Building and submitting now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 07:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030724.n137O7eq000340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 02:24:06 EDT --- I see Close button in About window not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 07:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030738.n137cJcM028080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 02:38:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1100189 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 874b61f609152e04c3a8180db90c5899 App-Asciio-1.02.71.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs nothing. + Package perl-App-Asciio-1.02.71-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(App::Asciio) = 1.02 perl(App::Asciio::Actions) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Ascii) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Connections) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Dialogs) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Elements) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Io) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Menues) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Options) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Setup) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::Undo) = 1.02.71 perl(App::Asciio::stripes::editable_arrow2) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::editable_box2) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::if_box) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::process_box) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::section_wirl_arrow) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::single_stripe) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::stripes) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::wirl_arrow) Requires: perl(Algorithm::Diff) perl(App::Asciio::Actions) perl(App::Asciio::Ascii) perl(App::Asciio::Connections) perl(App::Asciio::Dialogs) perl(App::Asciio::Elements) perl(App::Asciio::Io) perl(App::Asciio::Menues) perl(App::Asciio::Options) perl(App::Asciio::Setup) perl(App::Asciio::Undo) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::editable_box2) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::section_wirl_arrow) perl(App::Asciio::stripes::wirl_arrow) perl(Carp) perl(Clone) perl(Compress::Bzip2) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::TreeDumper) perl(Data::TreeDumper::Renderer::GTK) perl(Eval::Context) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Slurp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Glib) perl(Gtk2) perl(Gtk2::Gdk::Keysyms) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(List::Util) perl(Module::Util) perl(Readonly) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Drop fedora vendor tag as per guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop-file-install_usage 2) drop line from desktop file Encoding=UTF-8 as per discussed here https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-January/msg00160.html 3) I see both binary packages use same summary. Can you write summary for perl-App-Asciio as Perl modules to draw ascii art quickly and easily! This is just a suggestion. Feel free to modify it as per you think appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 08:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483625] Review Request: mythes-pt - Portuguese thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030849.n138nDnj010102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483625 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225744] Merge Review: fbset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030909.n1399dxs015222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225744 --- Comment #3 from Zdenek Prikryl 2009-02-03 04:09:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * change buildroot to be guidelines compliant Fixed. > * add comment why %{?_smp_mflags} cannot be used fbset doesn't use autotool's stuff, it is written by hand. So, you have to use CFLAGS variable to pass additional options to the gcc. > * add comment why make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} cannot be used This is a similar problem like above. In the makefile, there is no such variable. There is a $(PREFIX) variable which is set by %makeinstall > * add noreplace to the config (to silence rpmlint) Fixed. I committed the new spec into cvs. Please, review it, so I can bump a new release. Zdenek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts (renamed to thai-scalable-fonts) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030924.n139OKZr019045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |thaifonts-scalable - Thai |thaifonts-scalable - Thai |TrueType fonts |TrueType fonts (renamed to | |thai-scalable-fonts) --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-03 04:24:17 EDT --- This package has been renamed to thai-scalable-fonts as part of the new fonts packaging process (bug 477465). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030930.n139UtKu020947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |tbzatek at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030929.n139TvK9020377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-02-03 04:29:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nautilus-gdu Short Description: Nautilus extension for disk formatting Owners: tbzatek Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030936.n139aoWp030398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-03 04:36:48 EDT --- *** Bug 483320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483540] Review Request: perl-Net-Stomp - Stomp client module for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030941.n139f2q6031370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483540 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-03 04:41:01 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 09:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483320] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902030936.n139anba030368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483320 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-03 04:36:48 EDT --- Is open source after all, but a new review request has been opened. Closing as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483615 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031008.n13A8nEW029815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |439667 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-03 05:08:48 EDT --- A person reports that it works with the workaround from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439667#c8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483718] New: Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ca-0.20030920-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Catalan hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483718] Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031022.n13AMv4J009222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483718] Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031029.n13ATPsL010804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 05:29:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1101212 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 16ba21e982d981c8c74e54c5a9254fa3 hyph_ca_ES.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483628] Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031040.n13AeGsP013612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-03 05:40:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Geo-IPfree Short Description: Look up country of IP Address Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483718] Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031041.n13Af0C7013758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-03 05:40:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-ca Short Description: Catalan hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483649] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031038.n13Ac4XI012958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-03 05:38:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Workers Short Description: Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483657] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031043.n13AhrSB005942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483657 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-03 05:43:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor Short Description: Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031049.n13AnhfG016100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483641] Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031049.n13AnBQ1015853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483641 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031055.n13AtGdh018119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-03 05:55:14 EDT --- * In some cases you don't need to create directories before installing files to them, because 'install' utility has special switch '-D'. E.g. instead of mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initrddir} install -m 0755 %SOURCE1 %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/rabbitmq-server you may write install -D -m 0755 %SOURCE1 %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/rabbitmq-server * Invoke 'install' with '-p' switch while installing files (in order to preserve timestamps). * This line should be removed (looks like leftover) chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/rabbitmq-server * you should consider using rm %{_maindir}/{LICENSE,LICENSE-MPL-RabbitMQ,INSTALL} instead of rm %{_maindir}/LICENSE %{_maindir}/LICENSE-MPL-RabbitMQ %{_maindir}/INSTALL * regarding init-script. It should not be started by default. So, please, fix chkconfig's header from #chkconfig: 2345 80 05 to #chkconfig: - 80 05 You should fix init-header also. * It's a generally good idea to move some commandline switches from start section of initscript to /etc/sysconfig/%{name} See this, for example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ejabberd/devel/ejabberd.init?view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ejabberd/devel/ejabberd.sysconfig?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483641] Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031054.n13Asevm017714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483641 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-03 05:54:39 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f16f5274a90d3002f944762de53439914c1bb51a Date-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031058.n13Awsxo009977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #10 from Zdenek Prikryl 2009-02-03 05:58:50 EDT --- Ok, I committed the new spec file into the cvs. The library is now stripped. Please, review it, so I can bump a new release. Also, I did minor clean up in %prep and %bild section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483474] Review Request: perl-Test-TempDir - Temporary files support for testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031059.n13AxPK0010126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483474 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 10:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483641] Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031058.n13AwpVG009957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483641 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-03 05:58:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Date-Tiny Short Description: Date object with as little code as possible Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 11:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483723] New: Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Summary: Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-bg.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-bg-4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bulgarian thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 11:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483461] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Param - Simple role to provide a standard param method In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031130.n13BU8PA027084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483461 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 11:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483727] New: Review Request: touchcal - Calibration utility for touch screens Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: touchcal - Calibration utility for touch screens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483727 Summary: Review Request: touchcal - Calibration utility for touch screens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/touchcal.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/touchcal-0.31-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: touchcal is a tool to calibrate touch screens with serial controllers from the manufacturers EloGraphics (IntelliTouch E281-2310) and MicroTouch (SMT3 serial) for use under Xorg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 11:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483726] New: Review Request: smp_utils - Utilities for SAS management protocol (SMP) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: smp_utils - Utilities for SAS management protocol (SMP) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483726 Summary: Review Request: smp_utils - Utilities for SAS management protocol (SMP) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/smp_utils.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/smp_utils-0.94-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a package of utilities. Each utility sends a Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) Management Protocol (SMP) request to a SMP target. If the request fails then the error is decoded. If the request succeeds then the response is either decoded, printed out in hexadecimal or output in binary. This package supports multiple interfaces since SMP passthroughs are not mature. This package supports the linux 2.4 and 2.6 series and should be easy to port to other operating systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483729] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483729 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eli at orbsky.homelinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eli at orbsky.homelinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2b-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2b-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is my first effort at packaging. It would be greatly appreciated if the package was reviewed. kde-plasma-ihatethecashew will create a plasmoid widget when added to the workspace will get rid of the "cashew" sitting on the top left of the KDE Workspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483729] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031226.n13CQ4Bj007822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483729 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-03 07:26:03 EDT --- hello, what package you're trying to submit for review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eli at orbsky.homelinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-tranlatoid.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This my second package :) kde-plasma-translatoid provides a widget that will allow users to perform tranlations using the Google Translation engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483729] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031237.n13CboZ9010545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483729 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-03 07:37:49 EDT --- feel free to reopen this ticket if you need help in something -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031248.n13CmWHM004109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreznik at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-03 07:48:31 EDT --- rpmlint output: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install - remove mkdir %{buildroot} kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Removes the KDE Plasma Cashew From the Corner of the Display. - remove dot, summary shouldn't end with dot kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.src: E: description-line-too-long I don't like the cashew (the nasty icon in the right top corner of your plasma desktop kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.src: E: description-line-too-long that won't go away, even if plasma's locked)... It's impossible to remove this [cashew] - description is a little weird and full of emotions :) "I don't like..." is not a good description, please rewrite it in more polite and descriptive way. kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2b ['0.2b-1.fc10', '0.2b-1'] - use release too * Mon Feb 02 2009 Eli Wapniarski 0.2b-1 Do not say "My first package" in Changelog, "Initial package" is OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 12:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031255.n13Ctlr7006460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreznik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 13:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031301.n13D1nH3017148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-03 08:01:46 EDT --- - use build root consistently - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -> rm -rf ${buildroot} - license matches COPYING but not ihtc.cpp (LGPLv2 is mentioned in header, should be GPLv2), ask upstream to correct it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 13:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031329.n13DTnSq017173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-03 08:29:48 EDT --- rpmlint output: kde-plasma-translatoid.src: E: invalid-spec-name - missing 's' in spec filename kde-plasma-translatoid.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install - same as for #483728 kde-plasma-translatoid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized translator using google translator - capitalize summary, description too kde-plasma-translatoid.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1/README kde-plasma-translatoid.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.1 ['0.4.1-1.fc10', '0.4.1-1'] - same as for #483728 - license GPLv2+ - I'm not sure about Google trademarks, let me check - URL should be http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/translatoid?content=97511 - you should use 97511-translatoid%{version} in Source0 - remove flags due to Fedora policy - use build root consistently - rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -> rm -rf ${buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 13:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483723] Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031347.n13Dlkst030163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 13:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483459] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Iterator - Iterate over collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031358.n13DwBrJ001340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483459 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483723] Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031401.n13E1Kr7002403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 09:01:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1101536 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 57bc773ce540b2bc681795d005ba7e80 OOo-thes-bg-4.1.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) Use Source URL as http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/bgoffice/OOo-thes-bg-4.1.zip 2) License is GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483723] Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031413.n13EDwwS007686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-03 09:13:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-bg Short Description: Bulgarian thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031420.n13EKACl031406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #3 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-03 09:20:09 EDT --- I requested clarification for the licenses. Made the corrections as indicated in the above comments Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2b-2.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2b-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031424.n13EOQDt010494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-03 09:24:24 EDT --- Updated package in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031436.n13Eanfs002923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-03 09:36:48 EDT --- Almost more than one month no response from package maintainer. And looks like I also lost now interest in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 14:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031440.n13Eemvc004020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-03 09:40:47 EDT --- Ops, sorry, I missed ${buildroot} - it should be 'rm -rf %{buildroot}'. rpmlint output: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Removes the KDE Plasma Cashew From the Corner of the Display. - remove dot PS: check your SPEC, SRPM and RPM by rpmlint before uploading :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 15:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031510.n13FATJf023019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at matbooth.c | |o.uk) --- Comment #13 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-03 10:10:26 EDT --- I'll take this review. Everything looks good to me. I have a few questions: - does this comment mean we have reduced functionality? "... these files aren't needed for source plugins; they are only needed "so the example-installer plugins can create full projects in your workspace)" - could we match upstream's qualifier instead of that of the build? I worry this will give multilib conflicts since the builds on x86_64 and x86 will happen on different machines without the same hour and minute. If we can't match upstream's qualifier (in the case they're all different), just set it to something sane so all arches end up the same. - why not use separate dropins directories for the sub-packages? This gives a much cleaner %files section Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 15:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031511.n13FB6kA012346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-03 10:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 2/in tar file they are a shortcuts directories: _spe/shortcuts/ > this directories i can remove it in the spec file? > > rm -rf ./_spe/shortcuts/ - If you think this directory is not needed, please do. > _______________________________________________________________ > 3/ i look all import from .py file, left 3 diorecotries(tabs,test ans view) - So would you tell me if the dependency I pointed out on my previous comment is a must or just optional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 15:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031544.n13Fi063024011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #67 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-03 10:43:52 EDT --- any question / tought ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 16:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031602.n13G2bkj009667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-03 11:02:35 EDT --- As for the FIX rpmlint shows no warnings The only one is this: eclipse-emf.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided eclipse-emf-standalone I think we need a Provide there as well (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ProvidesObsoletes) OK package named correctly OK spec file named correctly OK meets the Packaging Guidelines (except for above) OK license is correct, approved and in %doc OK license field in the package spec file matches the actual license OK shell script for fetching sources is included OK package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (I tested x86_64 but it's noarch ...) OK md5sum of my fetched tarball doesn't match yours but that's just timestamps; diff -r gives no output OK owns all directories OK doesn't contain any duplicate files OK permissions are correctly set OK clean section present OK uses macros consistently OK package contains code OK no large documentation files OK if a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK %install MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK all filenames must be valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 16:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483569] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types-Set-Object - Set::Object type with coercions and stuff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031636.n13Gabgf007288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483569 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 16:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031627.n13GRIx0031848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #9 from Anithra 2009-02-03 11:27:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Is the camel casing necessary in the name? Just curious ... > > > > Its not really necessary, but is there just for the sake of uniformity as > > SystemTap also has camel casing. > > $ rpm -q systemtap > systemtap-0.8-1.fc10.x86_64 Point taken. Should i be changing it to systemtapgui?. We have been using the camel casing in the sourceforge rcp packages and ive just continued it here. I can change it if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031719.n13HJb7j020904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-03 12:19:36 EDT --- All three are well taken; I'll make those changes. Would you like to see them pre-approval, or can I make the changes before importing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031723.n13HNjEm021845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031722.n13HMXr4018737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #5 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-03 12:22:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2b-3.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2b-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031746.n13Hkgau023892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 --- Comment #18 from Shawn Starr 2009-02-03 12:46:39 EDT --- The spec file will be changed today. I am getting an official extragear tarball instead of pulling from SVN. We will use this for 4.2.x series, 4.3 will be using kdeplasma-addons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031753.n13HrOlj028216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslaw Gorny 2009-02-03 12:53:22 EDT --- * I've updated to latest version (0.16) - 0.13 was latest when I packaged it. * %changelog fixed So rpmlint is quiet - at least here. Results are here: SRPM URL: http://strony.aster.pl/muranow/fedora/mpdscribble-0.16-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://strony.aster.pl/muranow/fedora/mpdscribble.spec OK, I'll consider to package libmpdclient too ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 17:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031753.n13HrNuq025419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-03 12:53:22 EDT --- I'll update it next week. This weekend will be FOSDEM and I've to get my presentation ready and meet the fedora ambassadors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 18:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483557] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SimpleConfig - Moose role for setting attributes from a simple configfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031819.n13IJYc6001952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483557 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 18:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031838.n13Icx05007429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-03 13:38:58 EDT --- Version 1.1.2 SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify.spec SRPMS: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Commment: rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031902.n13J2vSv015091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-03 14:02:55 EDT --- I like systemtapgui 'cause it's consistent with the rest of the Eclipse packages to have all lower case but I won't raise a stink since it's not in the guidelines :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483187] Review Request: kde-plasma-weather - Plasma applet for weather forecasts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031911.n13JBGb6015083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483187 Shawn Starr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Shawn Starr 2009-02-03 14:11:15 EDT --- This is now in the package conveyor belt for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031923.n13JNPdl017441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #8 from MERCIER 2009-02-03 14:23:24 EDT --- pygame and python-quixote is optionnal package i use spe without this package and spe works perfectly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031950.n13JotA9026664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-03 14:50:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-rope Short Description: Python Code Refactoring Library Owners: toshio Branches: F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031954.n13Js03v027352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #2 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-03 14:53:59 EDT --- OK.. I believe that I should withdraw this because of the flag issue. Any thoughts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225630] Merge Review: buildsys-macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031954.n13JsXpn024697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225630 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 19:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902031956.n13Ju4Y4028055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #68 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-03 14:56:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > Look at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567#c17 > The current package miss the etl_profile.h move into %{_libdir}/ETL and the > related adds in ETL.pc (Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${libdir}/ETL) > If ever the current ETL_HAS_ are the same with both arches on multilibs system, > I would still prefer this solution since it will still be valid if others > ETL_HAVE need to be introduced later. etl_profile.h can not be moved there, apart from it not being a good idea, FHS forbids that. In case the include files become arch-dependent (which is not likely anyways), the be renamed and a header that would include one depending on __WORD_SIZE will be in their original place. This is a common practice. > About the package name. One could say this is not a -devel but a -headers > subpackage only, since it doesn't contain the symlink to a shared object. > But -devel and -headers only exist when there is a "main" package also. > (kernel-headers and kernel-devel exist because they are for a different usage > than the kernel package itself.) > Since there is no such "main" package, I think the current package is the main. > > In other words: > From one side, I don't see anything to override the Fedora guideline which tell > to use the upstream source archive name as the "source" package name. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming > See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567#c31 > > On the other side, it remains possible for the ETL source package to only build > an ETL-devel or ETL-headers package. (or to have only the > ETL-%{version}-%{release}.src.rpm just build a plain > ETL-%{version}-%{release}.%{_target_cpu}.rpm) > > (either using ETL-devel or ETL, the pkgconfig(ETL) provides will be properly > extracted). When someone says "devel package", what comes to my mind is "useful for development", not "having a symlink to shared object" and I'd like to leave it that way. I think you see that this might be a matter of personal taste and doesn't violate guidelines, so I'm not going to change it unless there's a really serious objection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032000.n13K0NKf026464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-03 15:00:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:07:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478941] Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032007.n13K7WlX028212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-03 15:07:30 EDT --- Closing. In rawhide and build for F-9 and F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479750] Review Request: libcelt - low-latency compressed audio format for voice and music In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032007.n13K7Xx7028237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479750 Bug 479750 depends on bug 478941, which changed state. Bug 478941 Summary: Review Request: celt - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478941 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032022.n13KMqc0031611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032023.n13KNsA9031758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 467420 depends on bug 467402, which changed state. Bug 467402 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] New: Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 Summary: Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/vmware-view-open-client.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/vmware-view-open-client-2.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: VMware View Open Client lets you connect from a Linux desktop to remote Windows desktops managed by VMware View. It supports two factor authentication with RSA SecurID and is able to create a secure tunnel using SSL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032051.n13KpRSI005510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-03 15:51:26 EDT --- Please note that creation of the package was optimized for speed: http://marek.mahut.sk/blog/2009/02/03/vmware-announces-open-source-vmware-viewer If you need to prove you can find actual errors in package in order to get sponsorship or whatever, this might be a good chance :o) Also, if you're interested in maintaining this more than me, please let me know ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032047.n13KlRad004620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-03 15:47:24 EDT --- this package defines rpath on x86_64 Fedora 10 system : ------------------ ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/synfig/modules/libmod_gradient.so' contains a ... ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/synfig/modules/libmod_ppm.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/synfig/modules/liblyr_freetype.so' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/synfig' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ------------------ This is because of the generated configure script. This can be avoided with autoreconf -f -i or patching the internal libtool between configure and make with: --------------- # remove rpath from libtool sed -i.rpath 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i.rpath 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool --------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472269] Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032056.n13Ku9B1006425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-03 15:56:08 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 20:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472303] Review Request: python-ropevim - Python module to add rope refactoring to vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032056.n13KuAcH006450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472303 Bug 472303 depends on bug 472269, which changed state. Bug 472269 Summary: Review Request: python-rope - Python Code Refactoring Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472269 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032112.n13LCW2s010696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fedora at matbooth.c | |o.uk) | --- Comment #15 from Mat Booth 2009-02-03 16:12:31 EDT --- Hi Andrew, thanks for taking the time. (In reply to comment #13) > I'll take this review. > > Everything looks good to me. I have a few questions: > > - does this comment mean we have reduced functionality? > > "... these files aren't needed for source plugins; they are only needed > "so the example-installer plugins can create full projects in your > workspace)" > No, nothing is lost. I will change that comment to be clearer. The files are still included such that they are present when you create the sample plugin projects in your workspace. (They are merely omitted from the associated source plugins of the sample plugins in the same way they are omitted from the associated source plugins of all other regular plugins.) If that makes any sense. To see what I mean just try creating some of the EMF sample plugins projects through the new example wizard and making sure the .project/.classpath files get created. > - could we match upstream's qualifier instead of that of the build? I worry > this will give multilib conflicts since the builds on x86_64 and x86 will > happen on different machines without the same hour and minute. If we can't > match upstream's qualifier (in the case they're all different), just set it to > something sane so all arches end up the same. I'm not sure I understand the multilib concern; this is a noarch package. It's no bother to change the qualifier though. Does it have any significance above being just the time it was built? > - why not use separate dropins directories for the sub-packages? This gives a > much cleaner %files section > No real reason beyond keeping the directory structure the build process gave me. (The resulting zip expands neatly into a single dropin directory during %install.) I can change it if you'd prefer. (In reply to comment #14) > As for the > > FIX rpmlint shows no warnings > > The only one is this: > > eclipse-emf.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided eclipse-emf-standalone > > I think we need a Provide there as well (see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ProvidesObsoletes) > Erm, yeah. It was after reading that link that I decided that we *don't* need a Provides there because we no longer provide the files that the obsoleted package provided in a compatible way. From that article: "if a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a compatible enough replacement as defined in above, use only the Obsoletes". That way of using EMF is genuinely obsolete and no longer supported upstream (and I don't believe there are any packages in Fedora that depend on it anyway). Is it really necessary to Provides it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483553] Review Request: mingw32-libltdl - Runtime libraries for GNU Libtool Dynamic Module Loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032123.n13LN4in013381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483553 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-03 16:23:03 EDT --- Built package for rawhide (CVS tag mingw32-libltdl-1.5.26-12.fc11). Built package for F-10 (CVS tag mingw32-libltdl-1.5.26-12.fc10) and submitted for updates-testing. Closing review request bug accordingly. Thanks for all the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032130.n13LU4En018506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-03 16:30:03 EDT --- while compiling synfigstudio, it failed at this step: synfig -q synfig_icon.sif -o 128x128/synfig_icon.png --time 0 -w 128 -h 128 synfig(10044) [22:26:57] info: target name not specified - using png Segmentation error It seems that synfig failed at runtime for some reasons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032127.n13LRdTw014528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #69 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-03 16:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #68) > (In reply to comment #66) > likely anyways), the be renamed and a header that would include one depending > on __WORD_SIZE will be in their original place. This is a common practice. It would be an accurate solution, indeed. > When someone says "devel package", what comes to my mind is "useful for > development" Actually the package name is already ETL which only produce an ETL-devel. So I think we are good. I'm looking synfig/synfig studio to have usability tests of the ETL package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] New: Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 Summary: Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gsim85.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gsim85-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://gsim85.sourceforge.net/ Description: It is an 8085 simulator. it is having very user friendly graphical user interface. It can be used to test 8085 programs before actualy implementing them on target board. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1102409 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint gsim85* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gsim85-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032127.n13LROPK014469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #16 from Mat Booth 2009-02-03 16:27:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > I'll take this review. > > > > Everything looks good to me. I have a few questions: > > > > - does this comment mean we have reduced functionality? > > > > "... these files aren't needed for source plugins; they are only needed > > "so the example-installer plugins can create full projects in your > > workspace)" > > > > No, nothing is lost. I will change that comment to be clearer. The files are > still included such that they are present when you create the sample plugin > projects in your workspace. (They are merely omitted from the associated source > plugins of the sample plugins in the same way they are omitted from the > associated source plugins of all other regular plugins.) > > If that makes any sense. > > To see what I mean just try creating some of the EMF sample plugins projects > through the new example wizard and making sure the .project/.classpath files > get created. > Oh my gods, there's a reason I'm not a technical writer. What I mean is, the patch (rightly) excludes those hidden files from the build process that creates source plugins. They are still present however, when the sample plugins are bundled to become the sample workspace projects available from the new->examples wizard within eclipse. I think that's marginally clearer... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483847] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032136.n13La2xL020022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483847] New: Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483847 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp - GStreamer RTSP server library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-rtsp/gstreamer-rtsp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-rtsp/gstreamer-rtsp-0.10.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A GStreamer-based RTSP server library, with Python and Vala bindings. Required to package gnome-dvb-daemon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032138.n13LcmUJ020633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-03 16:38:47 EDT --- Hi Mat, :) I understand now about removing the . files - I generally like to match the qualifier of upstream as sometimes plugins have hard-coded full major.minor.micro.qualifier numbers of their dependencies. Ignore my silly multilib statement :) - as for the dropins structure, if you think you can keep the %dir and various sub-directories/files straight in the %files sections, feel free to keep it as it is. I just personally find it easier to deal with single lines in each %files section. Since you get one zip from the build, what you have is fine. - I think you're right about the Provides as well. I genuinely wasn't sure. This package is APPROVED. Thanks very much, Mat! This package is incredibly popular and will enable us to get many other packages in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 21:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032143.n13LhWDq017882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #3 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-03 16:43:31 EDT --- No no, that's not necessary at all, just remove the flags, e.g. by inserting: sed -i -e 's/-fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common//' \ -e 's/-fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden//' \ -e 's/-ansi//' %{_target_platform}/CMakeFiles/translatoid.dir/flags.make before make %{?_smp_mflags} -C %{_target_platform} PS: Jaroslav, speaking about cflags, you should do the same in your kde-plasma-quickaccess:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459948] Review Request: libhildon - Hildon Application Framework - shared libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032208.n13M8hqU027213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459948 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-03 17:08:41 EDT --- Built and it rawhide so closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032207.n13M7V5q022718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #20 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-02-03 17:07:28 EDT --- While testing install on EL5 with SELinux enabled, I found that this is required: # chcon -t textrel_shlib_t '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/milter.so' Should I go ahead and add that to %post processing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032221.n13MLLSt025196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #25 from Muayyad Alsadi 2009-02-03 17:21:20 EDT --- same problem, please see my traceback the files are rendered perfectly but the segfault happens while unloading things or something like that I stepped in the program line by line, and it reached the end } of main without any problem selinux was disabled on my machine but I got it in the backtrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483853] New: Review Request: tcl-trf - Tcl extension providing "transformer" commands Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcl-trf - Tcl extension providing "transformer" commands https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483853 Summary: Review Request: tcl-trf - Tcl extension providing "transformer" commands Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tcl-trf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tcl-trf-2.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Trf is an extension library to the script language tcl. It provides transformer procedures which change the flow of bytes through a channel in arbitrary ways. The underlying functionality in the core is that of stacked channels which allows code outside of the core to intercept all actions (read/write) on a channel. Among the applications of the above provided here are compression, charset recording, error correction, and hash generation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032245.n13MjGY3030270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 William Cohen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wcohen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from William Cohen 2009-02-03 17:45:14 EDT --- This RPM will build on different architectures. Remove the following from the spec file: BuildArch: i386 Make the rpm file name agree with the one in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Allow someone to do: yum install "*stapgui*" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032256.n13Mu9KK032296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #27 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-02-03 17:56:06 EDT --- OK, I've asked upstream about that[1], and they advised me to use the CMake buildsystem, so I switched the build to that. [1] http://spring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=330802#p330802 I've checked that it still works, that rpmlint is still silent, and that it builds in koji on dist-f11, so hopefully everything is still OK. New package: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/spring-0.78.2.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Oh, and I've checked that users of this package can still play online, which was upstream's concern. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 22:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] New: Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 Summary: Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina-0.7.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Eina works like a common portable music player. Just plays what you want to listen. Apart from simplicity, today users expect more from a player than just reading files. Artwork, lyrics, network support, artist data and other music information find their right place in Eina. Plugins can take care of all the extra functionality, since Eina exposes everything from its internals. It's fairly easy to extend the player capabilities and change the way it works inside. Feel free to request new features and make things the way you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:02:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032302.n13N2VZl001142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-02-03 18:02:30 EDT --- * Tue Feb 03 2009 Aurelien Bompard 0.0.1.10393-1 - version 10393 - add patch to detect libunitsync.so properly - drop workaround for bug 478589 http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/spring/springlobby-0.0.1.10393-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483859] New: Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Summary: Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libg3d.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libg3d-0.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://automagically.de/g3dviewer/ Description: This library loads 3D models from various file formats. Its aim is to support basic import functionality for as much formats as possible. More complete support is better, of course, and the long time goal. To help developing plugins and for general use, too, there are a lot of basic 3d manipulation function, including vector and matrix math, common file reading stuff, transformations and 3d primitive support. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1102543 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint libg3d* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint libg3d-0.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032329.n13NTqtL007566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #3 from William Cohen 2009-02-03 18:29:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330798) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330798) Revised spec file to use compiler options passed in by rpmbuild This spec file makes use of the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS passed into the rpmbuild. This should make the rpmbuild a bit more flexible as the compiler options may be changed in the builds, e.g. stricter checking of code syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032327.n13NR0l1007285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #2 from William Cohen 2009-02-03 18:26:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330797) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330797) Avoid coding the compiler flags in the Makefile When RPMs are built through the build system CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS are passed in. This patch removes the hardcode options. The attached patch shows the changes in the makefile. I would think that these would be folded into the source file rather than carried as a patch in the RPM. The spec file needs minor change to pass in the flags. That will be a separate attachment. When compiling with the x86-64 F10 got the following warning during the build that should be examined more closely: subscriptionMgr.cpp: In member function 'int datamanager::SubscriptionMgr::handleRequest(datamanager::dmRequest*, datamanager::dmResponse*, int)': subscriptionMgr.cpp:130: warning: 'rc' may be used uninitialized in this function datamanager.cpp: In member function 'void datamanager::DataManager::destroyStapProcess(datamanager::stap_process_t*)': datamanager.cpp:413: warning: ignoring return value of 'int system(const char*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result datamanager.cpp: In member function 'void datamanager::DataManager::execStap(datamanager::dmRequest*)': datamanager.cpp:799: warning: ignoring return value of 'int system(const char*)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032341.n13NfTPa014760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-03 18:41:28 EDT --- There is a small cosmetic issue with the desktop file: the icon should either contain the full path to the file or just the name (without extension). Your desktop file contains name.extension. As a minor non-blocking issue, you have a duplicate BR, gtk2-devel is brought in by libglade2-devel. It would be awesome if you also convince the installer to preserve the timestamps of the pixmaps. Given the build log, I'd say that adding INSTALL="install -p" to "make install "should do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032345.n13NjJrC010516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 --- Comment #18 from Mat Booth 2009-02-03 18:45:18 EDT --- Thanks Andrew. I will change the qualifier, but I don't think I will change the %files section at this time since I know it works right now and is unlikely to have to change before the next coordinated release. I will revisit it then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032350.n13NobUx016074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Mat Booth 2009-02-03 18:50:35 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: eclipse-emf New Branches: F-10 Updated Summary: Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin Updated Description: The Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) allows developers to build tools and other applications based on a structured data model. From a model specification described in XMI, EMF provides tools and runtime support to produce a set of Java classes for the model, along with a set of adapter classes that enable viewing and command-based editing of the model, and a basic editor. This package was previously dead, so please could you also check that the devel branch is set up correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032350.n13NodTL011326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |483859 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902032350.n13Nodug011351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 3 23:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483863] New: Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 Summary: Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/g3dviewer.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/g3dviewer-0.2.99.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://automagically.de/g3dviewer/ Description: G3DViewer is a 3D file viewer for GTK+ supporting a variety of file types: * 3D Studio (.3ds, .prj) * LightWave (.lw, .lwb, .lwo) * Alias Wavefront (.obj) * Impulse TurboSilver / Imagine (.iob) * AutoCAD (.dxf) * Quake II Models (.md2) * Quake III Models (.md3) * Neutral File Format (.nff) * 3D Metafile (.3dmf, .3mf, .b3d) * Caligari TrueSpace Objects (.cob) * Quick3D Objects & Scenes (.q3o, q3s) * VRML 1.0 files (.wrl, .vrml) * AC3D objects (.ac, .acc) * LeoCAD Models (.lcd) * Racer car models (.ar, .dof) * Ultimate Stunts car models (.glb) * VDrift car models (.joe, .car) * COLLADA & G**gle Earth (.dae, .kmz) * LDraw (.dat, .mpd) * ASCII Scene Exporter (.ase) Koji scratch build: depends on libg3d rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint g3dviewer* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint g3dviewer-0.2.99.4-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040002.n1402i1i013365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-03 19:02:42 EDT --- Note: SRPM URL no longer valid, and the Source0 field does not provide a URL; I'm reviewing the slightly modified spec, using the newest gtk-vnc release. It looks like all patches can be dropped; I only have several things to clarify. Most of them are listed below, but also this: Documentation: the guideline specifies that man and info pages can be left out if they duplicate the pages in the main Fedora package. But how about license texts, README, ChangeLog, etc. -- the files that normally go under %doc ? Updated spec attached. MUST: + rpmlint: clean (but no documentation) + package name + spec file name + package guideline-compliant + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate - license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible - source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded + build dependencies complete N/A locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale ? library -> ldconfig (this is not needed for MinGW, I suppose?) N/A relocatable: give reason + own all directories + no dupes in %files + permission + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code N/A large docs => -doc N/A doc not runtime dependent ? headers in -devel: presumably all mingw32- packages are meant for cross-compiling, so this is irrelevant? N/A static in -static + if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig ? if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel ? devel requires versioned base package N/A desktop file uses desktop-file-install N/A clean buildroot before install + filenames UTF-8 SHOULD N/A if license text missing, ask upstream to include it - desc and summary contain translations if available ? package build in mock on all architectures Not tested -- not all dependencies in Fedora yet, thus no Koji + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane N/A other subpackages should require versioned base + if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package + require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040011.n140B0jr014987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-03 19:10:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330802) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330802) Updated patch for gtk-vnc-0.3.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040015.n140FONN020550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-03 19:15:23 EDT --- Thanks for your inputs (In reply to comment #1) > There is a small cosmetic issue with the desktop file: the icon should either > contain the full path to the file or just the name (without extension). Your > desktop file contains name.extension. Added a small patch > As a minor non-blocking issue, you have a duplicate BR, gtk2-devel is brought > in by libglade2-devel. fixed > It would be awesome if you also convince the installer to preserve the > timestamps of the pixmaps. Given the build log, I'd say that adding > INSTALL="install -p" to "make install "should do it. fixed Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gsim85.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gsim85-0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:13:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040013.n140DF5L020040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-03 19:13:13 EDT --- rpmlint is not really happy at all: rpmlint of source RPM: kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open kbd.src:23: E: prereq-use initscripts >= 5.86-1 kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd kbd.src: W: no-url-tag rpmlint of kbd: kbd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/kbd-1.15/ChangeLog kbd.x86_64: W: no-url-tag I think that --localedir=/usr/share/locale should be replaced with --localedir=%_datadir/locale At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I suggest to also add doc/dvorak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040014.n140ES9C015363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-03 19:14:27 EDT --- Seems like the real maintainer is not mitr any more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040040.n140evXw024752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 467410 depends on bug 467403, which changed state. Bug 467403 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-03 19:40:56 EDT --- Notes: - Fedora version has been updated to 1.4.4, with substantial patches. Should the mingw32 package be rebased first? - Package description is a bit sparse. Should it be copied from Fedora's? MUST ? rpmlint: source clean, binary has no-doc and script-without-shebang This is not in the guideline -- do all *.def need to have +x permissions? + package name + spec file name + package guideline-compliant + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate - license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible + source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded + build dependencies complete N/A locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale ? library -> ldconfig N/A relocatable: give reason + own all directories + no dupes in %files ? permission -- see question above + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code N/A large docs => -doc N/A doc not runtime dependent N/A static in -static N/A if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig N/A desktop file uses desktop-file-install + clean buildroot before install + filenames UTF-8 SHOULD + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane + if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package + require package not files Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040038.n140cTFV019648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-03 19:38:28 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ ==> see also note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 349a5260f40074ec7b7167ce554b4e0b6841cfc0 gsim85-0.2-2.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. Upstream's intention regarding the license is clearly expressed (help.c prints the GPLv2+ license & COPYING is bundled) but please ask them to include the license info in all source files. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 00:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] New: Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Summary: Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090203-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: BPG Fonts are a set of GPL licensed Georgian Unicode fonts. A few notes: * There is no version present for the GPL, but there is the font exception, which causes the license to be GPL+ with exceptions. rpmlint doesn't know about that yet, but I added it to the Licensing list. * One of the font families (Sans Modern) is derived from a Bitstream Vera font (Deja Vu). You cannot start with a Bitstream Vera licensed font and make a GPL licensed derivative, because the Bitstream Vera license is GPL incompatible. Thus, I've marked that family as License: Bitstream Vera. None of the other families are Deja Vu derivatives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 01:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483868] New: Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868 Summary: Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/iscan-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/iscan-firmware-2.16.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Firmware for the following Epson flatbed scanners: * GT-1500 / GT-D1000 * Perfection 2480/2580 PHOTO / GT-F500 * Perfection 3170 PHOTO / GT-9400 * Perfection 3490 PHOTO / GT-F520 * Perfection 4180 PHOTO / GT-F600 * Perfection 4490 PHOTO / GT-X750 * Perfection V10/V100 PHOTO / GT-S600 * Perfection V200 PHOTO / GT-F670 * Perfection V30/V300 / GT-F720 / GT-S620 * Perfection V350 PHOTO / GT-F700 * Perfection V500 PHOTO / GT-X770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 02:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040257.n142vGHu015122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra at wpi.edu --- Comment #1 from Charles R. Anderson 2009-02-03 21:57:13 EDT --- Initial review: >rpmlint bpg-fonts-20090203-1.fc11.src.rpm bpg-fonts.src: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Upstream source sha1sum matches: fb996423afac1f8a1091d907795115f98249cd7f BPG_GPL&GNU_Fonts.zip http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy + Fonts are in a single upstream archive. ? Multiple different families are in the same upstream archive. They share a release date, but the subpackages have different Versions. Additionally, as stated above, one of the font families has a different license. Can you check with upstream about splitting these into one-archive-per-family? It would probably be better to split at least the one non-GPL font into a different archive, and probably a different SRPM altogether. + Each family is in a separate subpackage. + naming follows projectname-fontfamilyname-fonts - SHOULD be built from sources, but font spec template says "For GPLed or LGPLed fonts this is required by the license." %build section is empty. Is TTF the preferred source for modifying/building these fonts? If not, where is the source? >rpmlint bpg-*.noarch.rpm bpg-algeti-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-algeti-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-algeti.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-algeti.conf bpg-algeti-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-chveulebrivi.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-chveulebrivi.conf bpg-chveulebrivi-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-courier-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-courier-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-courier.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-courier.conf bpg-courier-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-courier-s-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-courier-s-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-courier-s.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-courier-s.conf bpg-courier-s-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-elite-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-elite-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-elite.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-elite.conf bpg-elite-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-fonts-common.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-glaho-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-glaho-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-glaho.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-glaho.conf bpg-glaho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-ingiri-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-ingiri-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-ingiri.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-ingiri.conf bpg-ingiri-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-nino-medium-cond.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-nino-medium-cond.conf bpg-nino-medium-cond-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-nino-medium-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-nino-medium-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-nino-medium.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-nino-medium.conf bpg-nino-medium-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-sans-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-sans-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-sans.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-sans.conf bpg-sans-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-sans-medium-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-sans-medium-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-sans-medium.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-sans-medium.conf bpg-sans-medium-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-sans-modern-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-sans-modern-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-sans-modern.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-sans-modern.conf bpg-sans-regular-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-sans-regular-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-sans-regular.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-sans-regular.conf bpg-sans-regular-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-serif-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-serif-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-serif.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-serif.conf bpg-serif-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions bpg-serif-modern-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation bpg-serif-modern-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-bpg.conf-serif-modern.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/60-bpg.conf-serif-modern.conf bpg-serif-modern-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions 16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 45 warnings. Should the symlinks be relative, or is rpmlint being too pedantic here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 04:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040450.n144ofRc004600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Ed Hill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ed at eh3.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ed Hill 2009-02-03 23:50:40 EDT --- Hi Fabian, Thank you for taking some time to package G3DViewer! Here is a quick and somewhat incomplete review. I'll be happy to do a more thorough review later this week. good: + source matches upstream sha1sum: 26b4f0ea470b7572daf8d7773d2c00aa01f93058 libg3d-0.0.8.tar.gz 26b4f0ea470b7572daf8d7773d2c00aa01f93058 libg3d-0.0.8.tar.gz.1 + naming OK + spec is legible + builds in mock for F10 x86_64 + license is correctly included + use of ldconfig in post/postun looks OK + dir ownership looks OK + no *.la files + correct use of devel + has clean section + code not content needswork: - I think the license is LGPLv2+ not GPLv2+ -- please verify - Please fix some of the grammatical errors in the description. Here is a suggested replacement but please feel free to use something else if you're not satisfied with it: This library is typically used to load 3D model data from various file formats. Its aim is to support basic import functionality for as many formats as possible -- more file formats are planned. The library provides numerous functions for basic 3D manipulation, vector/matrix math, transformations, and 3D primitive support. - rpmlint reports a number of rpath errors: libg3d.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/g3d-stat ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/image/img_dds.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/image/img_sgi.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/image/img_bmp.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_ac3d.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_nff.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_ar.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_cob.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_q3o.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_leocad.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_lwo.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_3ds.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_md3.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_vrml.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_ase.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_joe.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_glb.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_obj.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_3dmf.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_iob.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_heightfield.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_dxf.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_ldraw.so ['/usr/lib64'] libg3d-devel.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libg3d/plugins/import/imp_md2.so ['/usr/lib64'] 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 24 errors, 0 warnings. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath for some possible fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 06:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040603.n1463T31009755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #6 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 01:03:28 EDT --- OK... Hopefull that's that. Thomas Luebking has indicated that he fixed the licensing test. The files seem to pass rpmlint Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2c-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2c-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 06:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040645.n146jwvm023062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-04 01:45:56 EDT --- Thanks for your work. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 06:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040646.n146k12L023090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-04 01:46:00 EDT --- Ok. Make sure you will create new SRPM fixing above issues and then only import in cvs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 06:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040646.n146k0PQ016799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-04 01:45:58 EDT --- Thanks for your work. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 07:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040712.n147CnXj027351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 07:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040712.n147CpAx027410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #26 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-04 02:12:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > this package defines rpath on x86_64 Fedora 10 system : Fixed. Thanks! (I, in fact, did not test functionality, but I assume removing a standard path from RPATH doesn't have any impact) (In reply to comment #24) > while compiling synfigstudio, it failed at this step: > synfig -q synfig_icon.sif -o 128x128/synfig_icon.png --time 0 -w 128 -h 128 > synfig(10044) [22:26:57] info: target name not specified - using png > Segmentation error > > It seems that synfig failed at runtime for some reasons. (In reply to comment #25) > same problem, please see my traceback Works for me (el5, but I think I successfully built it in fedora-devel-i386 mock buildroot before). I'm wondering if mod_avcodec built for you for some reason (ffmpeg-devel installed?). Could you please attach a strace of failing synfig? Get it with: "strace -o trace.txt -f synfig -q synfig_icon.sif -o 128x128/synfig_icon.png --time 0 -w 128 -h 128" Thanks! New package (addresses just the rpath issue): SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/synfig.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/synfig-0.61.09-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 07:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040716.n147G8VQ021633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #27 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-04 02:16:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > New package (addresses just the rpath issue): Not quite true. Fixes Lorenzo's issue as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 07:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040712.n147ClfL020906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-04 02:12:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-App-Asciio Short Description: Draw ascii art quickly and easily! Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 07:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 02:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040737.n147bBYA031236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #11 from Zdenek Prikryl 2009-02-04 02:37:09 EDT --- I did a few little changes. So now, (hopefully) the correct version of the spec file is in the cvs :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040822.n148MplO006318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #4 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 03:22:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > No no, that's not necessary at all, just remove the flags, e.g. by inserting: > > sed -i -e 's/-fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common//' \ > -e 's/-fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden//' \ > -e 's/-ansi//' %{_target_platform}/CMakeFiles/translatoid.dir/flags.make > I've confirmed that flags.make is where the sed command looks for it. But, rpmbuild still wants to install the flags. I've not included the sed command in the spec file. All other indicated corrections and implied suggestions (visa vi Google). All files seem to pass the rpmlint test Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Any additional help with removing the flags from the package would be greatly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:29:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040829.n148Tr8i001647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #7 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 03:29:52 EDT --- So... am I clear to move this to koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040834.n148YRu5002526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 03:34:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Thanks for your work. > APPROVED. Ok, thank you for your great review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040855.n148tXGV012231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-04 03:55:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103094 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bad27502bda4377fa6e7e39602b82aab Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=54, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.66 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.71 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Test::Unit::Debug) perl(Test::Unit::HarnessUnit) perl(Test::Unit::Lite) = 0.11 perl(Test::Unit::Lite::AllTests) perl(Test::Unit::Result) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite) Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(Symbol) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Take care to remove BR:perl before committing to cvs Another thing, I see META.yml specifies which provides: this package should provide which this package already providing so I see no filter required here. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040854.n148sk09006013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-04 03:54:44 EDT --- OK, some additional steps (because of updated srpm): + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at host-12-116 SOURCES]$ md5sum mpdscribble-0.16.tar.bz2* deeeb403ebd50b7abacd1eeabc96b320 mpdscribble-0.16.tar.bz2 deeeb403ebd50b7abacd1eeabc96b320 mpdscribble-0.16.tar.bz2.from_srpm [petro at host-12-116 SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all primary architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103246 This package is ============== ============== == APPROVED == ============== ============== Your next steps are: * Wait for someone, who sponsors you (I cannot sponsor you). * Request cvs branches (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure ) * Proceed from step 8 at this page - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 08:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483868] Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040857.n148vbCR006811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-04 03:57:35 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040903.n149317a014168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-04 04:02:59 EDT --- If you have new urls, please post them here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040913.n149DMRa016774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 04:13:21 EDT --- - rpmlint output is clean - OK - license is now clear (GPLv2) - OK - sources md5 - OK - koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103293 - OK - works as expected - OK It's OK for me, Rex, it's now your turn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483868] Review Request: iscan-firmware - Firmware for Epson flatbed scanners In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040912.n149C9LH010461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483868 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-04 04:12:08 EDT --- Remarks: * No idea what is AVASYS Public License (rpmlint also shouts that it doesn't know what is it), however it looks like "Distributable, No Modifications Permitted". * I found that there are different versions of AVASYS Public License - dated as 2008-04-01 and as 2005-04.01. * There is also another one license, named LICENSE.EPSON.{en,ja}.txt. * Missing BR: udev ( rpm -qf /lib/firmware ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040923.n149N3ed012928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-04 04:23:02 EDT --- I filled a bug about the statement in the source file header. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040926.n149QPB8013793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-04 04:26:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gsim85 Short Description: An 8085 microprocessor simulator Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040932.n149WqdF014950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-04 04:32:51 EDT --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 09:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 04:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902040951.n149pDse018919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-04 04:51:10 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330847) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330847) strace ouput while using synfig There is few things that I feel as very annoying for * First there is the synfig_module.cfg needs: usually libtool-ltdl modules doesn't need to be hardcoded in such file. That will be hard to extend the functionnalities of synfig if we need to register every module using this. * Then, it seems that the modules implementation settle on the needs of the libtool .la files. This is very annoying and needs to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041000.n14A0IFN020938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-04 05:00:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > No no, that's not necessary at all, just remove the flags, e.g. by inserting: > > > > sed -i -e 's/-fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common//' \ > > -e 's/-fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden > > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden//' \ > > -e 's/-ansi//' %{_target_platform}/CMakeFiles/translatoid.dir/flags.make > > > I've confirmed that flags.make is where the sed command looks for it. But, > rpmbuild still wants to install the flags. I've not included the sed command in > the spec file. These compilation flags are not uncommon for KDE (or C++) sources, e.g. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81037 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041001.n14A1tcd027537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #15 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-04 05:01:51 EDT --- OK package named correctly OK spec file named correctly OK meets the Packaging Guidelines (except for above) OK license is correct, approved and in %doc OK license field in the package spec file matches the actual license OK package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (compiles on x86 cleanly) OK owns all directories OK doesn't contain any duplicate files OK permissions are correctly set OK clean section present OK uses macros consistently OK package contains code OK no large documentation files OK if a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK %install MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK all filenames must be valid UTF-8 The only remaining issue is file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/trilead-ssh2-213/HISTORY.txt "Micha?l" is not actually UTF-8 in this file. Just put the next line in the %prep and we are good to go. iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 -o HISTORY.txt HISTORY.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:12:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041012.n14ACTSe029910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-04 05:12:28 EDT --- External Bug report about the license file for tracking reasons http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041015.n14AF5Hd030575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-04 05:15:04 EDT --- External Bug reports for tracking http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2563186&group_id=147440&atid=768435 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2562577&group_id=147440&atid=768435 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2561951&group_id=175471&atid=873367 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2561937&group_id=175471&atid=873367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041012.n14ACjX0023651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-04 05:12:43 EDT --- External Bug report about the license file for tracking reasons http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041019.n14AJXRY031316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #6 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 05:19:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > These compilation flags are not uncommon for KDE (or C++) sources, > e.g. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81037 Without a doubt. However, the compilation flag suggested did not work. And since I am no programmer, I would be very hard pressed to know the correct flags or syntax. Hence, the request for additional assistance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041027.n14ARFll000601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-04 05:27:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Unit-Lite Short Description: Unit testing without external dependencies Owners: allisson Branches: F-10 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480215] Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041031.n14AVogL001620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480215 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-04 05:31:49 EDT --- I will look deeper into this after FOSDEM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041056.n14AuBFU000640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-02-04 05:56:11 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 10:55:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 05:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041055.n14At3jZ000360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225707] Merge Review: dosfstools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041102.n14B2tqh008338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225707 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041111.n14BBGBg004335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 06:11:15 EDT --- I tried to install this widget and the problem is that it's unusable without flags - flags are used in language chooser... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041121.n14BLS7N012448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 06:21:27 EDT --- - rpmlint output is clean - OK problems: - capitalize description - do not use TM - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483933] New: Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933 Summary: Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-autobox/perl-autobox.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-autobox/perl-autobox-2.55-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The autobox pragma allows methods to be called on integers, floats, strings, arrays, hashes, and code references in exactly the same manner as blessed references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041135.n14BZxKn015657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041135.n14BZZt5009631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041136.n14BacLX009842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 11:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041145.n14BjOr7018044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 06:45:23 EDT --- rpmlint output: libfli.src: E: description-line-too-long Finger Lakes Instrument library is used by applications to control FLI line of CCDs and Filter wheels - wrap long line libfli-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - ok, no devel documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 12:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041205.n14C5NC3023032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-04 07:05:22 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 12:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041229.n14CTWWi028619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #9 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 07:29:31 EDT --- OK... That should be that except for the flag issue. Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-3.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041303.n14D3I6A030335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #5 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-02-04 08:03:17 EDT --- Thanks for the review Peter. All of those seem reasonable and I will fix them promptly. But I've got one question regarding init-script run levels. I know that for example ejabberd also isn't started by default but it seems somehow natural for rabbit users that after reboot/crash the server is up again. Possibly run levels 2345 is too much and 3 5 would be definitely enough. Can you elaborate on the rationale against starting it by default? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript doesn't seem to be strictly against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041302.n14D2vGX030218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 08:02:56 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f10 / x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: not clean, see previous comment [-] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: BSD - LICENSE.BSD is 2 clause new BSD license with no advertising but sources are under 3 clause BSD license. I think it's OK for review and it's not blocker but ask upstream to match it. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - md5 sums do not match! [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [-] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [!] Package consistently uses macros. - Please do not use %{__ macros and use only , I talked to RPM developer and FESCo member and they do not like it. But this is not a blocker, feel free to select one consistent style. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji. Tested on: koji dist-f11 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103679 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji dist-f11 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === SUMMARY === - Clean rpmlint output - Ask upstream about licenses - Correct source tarball - Check macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041315.n14DFWSq008311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 08:15:30 EDT --- And maybe at least description should be more informative - it's Plasma widget etc... I'm really not sure about inclusion of flags - we should wait until someone from KDE-SIG asks Fedora legal/board - KDE-SIG is planning to ask... Without approval from them I can't approve this package for Fedora. Or we can prepare patch to show label instead flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483277] Review Request: nautilus-gdu - Nautilus extension for disk formatting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041315.n14DFH21008217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483277 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-02-04 08:15:16 EDT --- Successfully built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] New: Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Summary: Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/vlgothic-fonts/vlgothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/vlgothic-fonts/vlgothic-fonts-20090204-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: VLGothic provides Japanese TrueType fonts from the Vine Linux project. Most of the glyphs are taken from the M+ and Sazanami Gothic fonts, but some have also been improved by the project. This package will replaces VLGothic-fonts package during the package renaming transition because of applying new font packaging policy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 13:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041347.n14DldmR016147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041412.n14EC6wD022568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 09:12:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330864) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330864) LIB_SUFFIX patch Same style patch as for libfli. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041421.n14EL5e3017815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #3 from Gratien D'haese 2009-02-04 09:21:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > > Good. Wondering if the following line is relevant for the description: > > "which is the U.S. government's chosen candidate for the Advanced > > Encryption Standard." Your call. > > I removed some sentences. Thanks - it is much better. > > > Will you be able to fix the build problem on PPC? Otherwise, add a tag to > > exclude it. > > Via koji I was able to build on ppc. > > I will exclude ppc64 for the moment. This is my second package with issues > about openssl on ppcX. Thanks - acceptable for me. > > > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > > that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > > > > You need the glibc-devel package for -lcrypt > > I don't think that I need glibc-devel. The koji log shows that the check for > -lcrypt is ok without BR glibc-devel. But maybe I'm mistaken... Hum, is indeed strange, but your comment is correct. It works nice without it. So, unless somebody complains do not use in the spec file. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1100286&name=build.log > > Updated files: > > Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt.spec > SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-2.fc9.src.rpm The SRPM URL was wrong! The correct URL is: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.7-2.fc10.src.rpm Next actions are: 1/ final approval of the spec and RPM/SRPM packages of an "official" approver is still needed 2/ finding a sponsor, but you did not need one according to your comment #2 Thanks, go ahead - for me it's fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484049] New: Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~amd34/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral.spec SRPM URL: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~amd34/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: See after description for comments on things I have already done to test this spec file. (from spec file) Proof General is a generic front-end for proof assistants (also known as interactive theorem provers) based on Emacs. Proof General allows one to edit and submit a proof script to a proof assistant in an interactive manner: - It tracks the goal state, and the script as it is submitted, and allows for easy backtracking and block execution. - It adds toolbars and menus to Emacs for easy access to proof assistant features. - It integrates with X-Symbol for some provers to provide output using proper mathematical symbols. - It includes utilities for generating Emacs tags for proof scripts, allowing for easy navigation. Proof General supports a number of different proof assistants (Isabelle, Coq, PhoX, and LEGO to name a few) and is designed to be easily extendable to work with others. Tests: - Runs on my machine (F10 i386) in both emacs and xemacs (even when both packages are simultaneously installed) - Builds in mock - rpmlint output: [adunn at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/emacs-common-proofgeneral.spec RPMS/noarch/*proofgeneral* emacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation emacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-proofgeneral.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-proofgeneral-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. I am under the impression that the separate subpackages for compiled elisp and elisp files do not need separate documentation (which is the source of these warnings). I saw this warning in other emacs-involved RPMS that I downloaded. If that is not correct, it can be easily corrected. Concerns: I think this spec file is essentially correct, but I thought I might point out an issue or two for any potential reviewer: 1) There is a desktop file to run the "proofgeneral" script. I can imagine the script being useful for other programs to call, but I'm not sure the gui way of running this has any real purpose (all it is going to do is run emacs/xemacs - the proofgeneral script with no arguments). I have not currently installed the desktop file but left it in the package for those that might want to examine it. Does that sound like a reasonable compromise? 2) I added a somewhat Fedora-specific patch that modifies the "proofgeneral" script just mentioned. It might be good to examine whether this is an alright way of accomplishing what was desired: independence of emacs variant (emacs/xemacs) in a way that works for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041448.n14EmGxf024031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 09:48:15 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f10 / x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: not clean - libindi.src: W: strange-permission libindi0_0.6.tar.gz 0400 - libindi.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libindi.so.0.6 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 [-] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - Tarball includes licenses in its own file only for LGPL, not GPL. As GPL is stated in right sources I don't think this is blocker but should be better to ask upstream. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [!] Package consistently uses macros. - Please do not use %{__ macros and use only , I talked to RPM developer and FESCo member and they do not like it. But this is not a blocker, feel free to select one consistent style. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji. - libfli not in koji [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - libfli not in koji [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === SUMMARY === - Clean rpmlint output - Ask upstream about licenses - Check macros - Check in Koji once libfli is in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041454.n14EscvB000598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-04 09:54:37 EDT --- > Should the symlinks be relative, or is rpmlint being too pedantic here? rpmlint's check here was decided by the FPC (and just ratified by FESCo) to be a bit too strict. I'm going to write this up today, but you can look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks , which says: "There are two ways of making a symlink, either as a relative link or an absolute link. In Fedora, neither method is required. Packagers should use their best judgement when deciding which method of symlink creation is appropriate." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484051] New: Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484051 Summary: Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/sockettest/sockettest.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/sockettest/sockettest-3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A java tool for socket testing. It can create both TCP and UDP client or server. It can be used to test any server or client that uses TCP or UDP protocol to communicate. koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 14:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041452.n14EqpDO025252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-04 09:52:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > ? Multiple different families are in the same upstream archive. They share a > release date, but the subpackages have different Versions. Additionally, as > stated above, one of the font families has a different license. Can you check > with upstream about splitting these into one-archive-per-family? It would > probably be better to split at least the one non-GPL font into a different > archive, and probably a different SRPM altogether. I can check, but that would effectively be 15 zip files instead of just one. If it were me, I wouldn't do it. :) Upstream is probably unaware of the GPL incompatibility with the Bitstream Vera derived font. Font licensing compatibility is poorly understood. > + Each family is in a separate subpackage. > + naming follows projectname-fontfamilyname-fonts > - SHOULD be built from sources, but font spec template says "For GPLed or > LGPLed fonts this is required by the license." %build section is empty. Is > TTF the preferred source for modifying/building these fonts? If not, where is > the source? TTF is typically the preferred source for modifying fonts, with tools like fontforge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041519.n14FJ9w2006733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #12 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-04 10:19:09 EDT --- > These compilation flags are not uncommon for KDE (or C++) sources, > e.g. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81037 Do you mean we should leave them as they are? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041519.n14FJkTR006844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Tomeu Vizoso changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomeu at sugarlabs.org --- Comment #5 from Tomeu Vizoso 2009-02-04 10:19:45 EDT --- evince 2.25.90 and gnome-python-desktop 2.25.90 have been released and would be enough to run sugar-read. sugar-evince is not needed any more as has been completely upstreamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041518.n14FIFUn006599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #11 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-04 10:18:14 EDT --- Wait wait -- I just realized that I'm not sure whether we speak about the same issue: What I told you is how to remove the additional non-Fedora GCC compiler flags. I revisited the sed script, it was just wrong wrapped after pasting into bugzilla, hence once again: " sed -i -e 's/-fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common//' \ -e 's/-fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden//' \ -e 's/-ansi//' %{_target_platform}/CMakeFiles/translatoid.dir/flags.make " This should definitely help to get rid of all of the flags, yesterday I downloaded your SRPM and tested it. !Note: This has *nothing* to do with the country flags, it's completely unrelated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041527.n14FR1E5008650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-04 10:27:00 EDT --- I will look on this review. Please consider adding fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com to cc when you create new Review Request of perl package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484057] New: Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 Summary: Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: scarter4 at learn.senecac.on.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~scarter4/epigrafica-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~scarter4/epigrafica-fonts-1.01-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A font family based on the Optima designs by HermannZapf, made by the Department of Mathematics of the University of the Aegean. This is my first package to be reviewed, and I am looking for a sponser. Any feedback is most definitely welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484057] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041532.n14FWXw5009986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 Stephen Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041533.n14FXPVo010166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 10:33:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Wait wait -- I just realized that I'm not sure whether we speak about the same > issue: What I told you is how to remove the additional non-Fedora GCC compiler > flags. I revisited the sed script, it was just wrong wrapped after pasting into > bugzilla, hence once again: > > ... > > !Note: This has *nothing* to do with the country flags, it's completely > unrelated. So it's misunderstanding - country flags are legal problem! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484051] Review Request: sockettest - Test My Socket In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041540.n14FepNJ005720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484051 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |sockettest -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041547.n14FlE8x007181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-04 10:47:12 EDT --- I will sponsor Anithra. I will also review this package sometime before Friday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 15:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041556.n14FuNRa016577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-04 10:56:22 EDT --- You forgot to set flag "fedora?review?" setting it for you. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. SEE LATER - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: b72c0aa8950a6dfc1908b884fc768577 for both N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch FAIL - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK- Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file FAIL - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. FAIL - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done perl-Test-Harness-Straps-0.30-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(Test::Harness::Assert) = 0.02 perl(Test::Harness::Iterator) = 0.02 perl(Test::Harness::Iterator::ARRAY) perl(Test::Harness::Iterator::FH) perl(Test::Harness::Point) = 0.01 perl(Test::Harness::Results) = 0.01 perl(Test::Harness::Straps) = 0.30 perl-Test-Harness-Straps = 0.30-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Config) perl(Exporter) perl(Test::Harness::Assert) perl(Test::Harness::Iterator) perl(Test::Harness::Point) perl(Test::Harness::Results) perl(strict) perl(vars) SHOULD Items: OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs Didn't test - Should function as described. No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) TODO: please add build requires: perl(Test::More) it is no more part of perl itself in Fedora 11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103852 and try to build is as --scratch in koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 16:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:19:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041619.n14GJgol022750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 16:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041620.n14GKIlB023160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-04 11:20:17 EDT --- I removed ownership of ${_sysconfdir}/nocpulse added LICENSE did not add README since upstream (that me :) do not provide any README Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Debug/perl-NOCpulse-Debug-1.23.15-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 16:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041619.n14GJOTr016920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 16:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041649.n14GnGDb024438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-04 11:49:15 EDT --- I am not familiar with selinux, however I guess it is better that you ask Dan Walsh how to deal with this (maybe policy will be added in selinux-policy?) after this is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 17:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041710.n14HAHZD002497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #14 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 12:10:16 EDT --- Ooops sorry about the misunderstanding. I thought you were pointing out an issue discussed relatively recently on the fedora-kde mailing list. So... OK.. Done. Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-4.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 17:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041712.n14HCxdI029549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 17:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041758.n14HwgDS008027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 Hubert Plociniczak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hubert at lshift.net --- Comment #2 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-02-04 12:58:41 EDT --- I am sure Peter will follow with the proper review, but here are some bits that I found in my informal review: - put Requires(preun) into single line - %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/couchdb instead of ${_sysconfdir}/default/couchdb - you have %exclude %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/couchdb %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/couchdb - use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir} - init-script must not be marked as %config (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscript_packaging) - if you use %{_localstatedir} then use it consistently, for example in useradd or sed - use -D flag in 'install' instead of 'mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}' - remove 'exit 0' in %pre - remove 'shadow-utils' since it is on ExceptionsList (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines) - shouldn't mochiweb be a separate sub-package? - fix the obvious rpmlint warnings, like permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041829.n14ITmR3015362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Bug 472848 depends on bug 453018, which changed state. Bug 453018 Summary: RfE: New release 1.1 of jakarta-commons-cli is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #38 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-04 13:29:46 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041838.n14IcDcG017390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-04 13:38:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > ! Please stop daemon on removal (not upgrade, i.e. [ $! = 0 ]) This is [ $1 = 0 ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041841.n14IfSi8018251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #12 from Anithra 2009-02-04 13:41:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I will sponsor Anithra. I will also review this package sometime before > Friday. Thanks Andrew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041839.n14Id8LS017532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-04 13:39:07 EDT --- Looking forward to add it under FEL-11 livedvd :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041837.n14IbAEw017225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-04 13:37:09 EDT --- Now for 1.2.8.23-2: * Scriptlets - For user/group creation, please follow below: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups - Again please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets ! Requires(preun): chkconfig, initscripts is missing (for initscripts dependency see below) ! Please stop daemon on removal (not upgrade, i.e. [ $! = 0 ]) * attr - For safety, please write %attr(0600,root,root) %config(noreplace) on %{_sysconfdir}/mydns.conf explicitly. ! By the way is it okay that this file is not readable even from mydns user/group? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041851.n14Ip0MX020612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-04 13:50:59 EDT --- Okay, then I will wait for your next srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041852.n14Iq0aX020955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-04 13:51:59 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 18:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041853.n14IrDVY021141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-04 13:53:12 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I'll modify the loop before import like that : for i in CHANGES LICENSE README do sed -e 's/\r//' $i > $i.tmp touch -c -r $i $i.tmp mv $i.tmp $i done ======================= New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: posterazor Short Description: Make your own poster Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 19:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041934.n14JYqv5030899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #23 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-04 14:34:50 EDT --- Ping mmahut -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 19:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041954.n14JsO6b009488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-04 14:54:22 EDT --- Unfortunately, I have to find out, that we have to add 'BR python-devel' in opposite of my statement in #7. On my local system I could build it without this BR, but on dist-f11 it doesn't works properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 19:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: SystemTapGuiServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902041955.n14Jttnh003703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #4 from Anithra 2009-02-04 14:55:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This RPM will build on different architectures. Remove the following from the > spec file: > > BuildArch: i386 > > Make the rpm file name agree with the one in: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 > > Allow someone to do: > > yum install "*stapgui*" Thanks Will. I will rename the rpm to systemtapguiserver (removing camel casing) and will be renaming the client (bug 483205) to eclipse-systemtapgui. Will post the new package with all changes mentioned above shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 20:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:29:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484057] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042029.n14KTfHl011833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 15:29:40 EDT --- Some feedback (not a real complete review yet, you have some rework to do first) 1. your packaging is based on the templates we used 2/3 months ago. Since then a major new version has been approved. You need to read the current version of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy and adapt to it (in particular http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Technical_implementation but do read the rest, it has changed and been clarified too) The policy changes have been made to simplify packaging, trying to minimize the work needed to adapt current packages, so it should not be too hard for you. 2. your summary is not very informative 3. URL needs to be the font project homepage, your chosen URL is not really useful in a browser 4. since this entity creates other fonts, a foundry prefix would be a good idea in the naming (for example aegean) 5. since this you know this font is a cosmetica fork, which is itself an optima fork, you need to tell this to fontconfig via some substitution rules. fontpackages-devel has some templates you can follow to do this easily 6. since we've considerably simplified fonts packaging lately, we require at least *two* clean font package submissions before sponsoring someone. So you'll need another submission for this one to succeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 20:50:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042050.n14KoY1I017525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-04 15:50:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew Short Description: Removes the KDE Plasma Cashew From the Corner of the Display Owners: eliwap Branches: f-10 InitialCC: jreznik rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042109.n14L9Dx2022528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tagoh at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-04 16:09:12 EDT --- I'd have used vl-gothic not vlgothic but your choice is ok too. Upgrade paths work and the package looks sane. (catalogue is probably leftover cruft since you don't use it, and checking the package is ok would be easier if you used the same line order as the template, but that does not change the result) ??? APPROVED ??? Please do not forget to update comps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042115.n14LFabt029655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #9 from Jerome Soyer 2009-02-04 16:15:35 EDT --- Hi Jochen, Thanks for your work on python-bicyclerepair. I just reinstall my broken machine and reinstall a 64bit Fedora for testing it but you have been faster ;-) I will modify the spec and resubmit you a SRPM tomorrow :) Good evening ! I think python-devel BR must be, it's more safe no ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042142.n14LgJw3003080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-04 16:42:16 EDT --- Thank you for going on, rpmlint against latest CVS build (from http:// cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/gpm/gpm.spec?revision=1.69) > gpm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 Any ideas for this? That really looks strange to me - and I do not really have a clue what causes this. See also below at the bottom of this comment. > gpm.src: W: strange-permission gpm.init 0755 > gpm.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gpm > gpm.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gpm > gpm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > gpm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation Ignore so far. GPM should be enabled per default, otherwise the service does not make so much sense to me. Docs are not available and permission can't be solved after wrong import (as eplained above). > %__cc %{?_smp_mflags} -o inputattach %{SOURCE2} Well, we've lost $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. See build logs: %{?_smp_mflags} only causes -jX, not the rest of the flags $RPM_OPT_FLAGS would bring. So please re-add. Could you perform real integer comparisons rather half string comparisions? -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then +if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then -if [ "$1" -ge "1" ]; then +if [ $1 -ne 0 ]; then Following is suggested to not break rpm transaction if something goes wrong: -/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/gpm.info.gz --delete %{_infodir}/dir +/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/gpm.info.gz --delete %{_infodir}/dir || : Except of things raised above, I would say we're fine. Most hard seems to me shared-lib-calls-exit - can we avoid it or can we just ignore the warning; I had a look to bug #450011 and if I see correct, it depends on how it is done; sometimes it can't be avoided. You know code better than me...suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 21:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042155.n14LtcV7000467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #10 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-04 16:55:37 EDT --- Eli, please wait for the reviewer to set the proper flag (fedora-review must be "+", a "?" indicates only that the reviewer is going to review the package and should be set right in the beginning). To Jreznik: If you wanted to approve the package by this comment: "It's OK for me, Rex, it's now your turn." please set the proper flag and state that clearly, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 22:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042207.n14M79P8003012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #11 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-04 17:07:08 EDT --- Moreover, Eli, please: the GCC flags should be corrected, you can do that in a similar way like I suggested you in the review of kde-plasma-translatoid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 22:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:19:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483933] Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042219.n14MJgx0005217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-04 17:19:41 EDT --- You forgot to set up fedora?review? flag. I done that for you. I take this review and will do it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 22:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042229.n14MTiOa012568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-04 17:29:43 EDT --- Eli: please be patient :) Milos: I didn't mean it as approved, we had deal with Rex to check this review and sponsor Eli. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 22:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:33:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042233.n14MXtt6007883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #10 from MERCIER 2009-02-04 17:33:53 EDT --- rpmlint issue: ___________________________________________________________________________ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/spe.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.noarch.rpm spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/Blender_signature.py "BPY" spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/spe_blender.py "BPY" spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/winpdb_blender.py "BPY" 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. ___________________________________________________________________________ #!BPY It tells Blender that this is a Blender script, and therefore it will consider it when scanning for scripts. link for spec rpm and src.rpm file: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/spe.spec http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm ___________________________________________________________________________ $ koji build --scratch dist-f10 rpmbuild/SRPMS/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: rpmbuild/SRPMS/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:28 1.16 MiB 42.02 KiB/sec Created task: 1105120 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1105120 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1105120 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1105121 buildArch (spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1105121 buildArch (spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm, noarch): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1105120 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1105120 build (dist-f10, spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 22:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:55:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042255.n14MtP3k018564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.c | |o.in) --- Comment #34 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-04 17:55:24 EDT --- hello any news about daemontools ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 4 23:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902042353.n14Nr5Vp032138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-04 18:53:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > rpmlint issue: [...] > $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.noarch.rpm > spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter [...] > #!BPY It tells Blender that this is a Blender script, and therefore it will > consider it when scanning for scripts. I'd say this calls for a RFE in rpmlint. I suggest to file a bug for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 00:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050026.n150QY37007153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #12 from MERCIER 2009-02-04 19:26:32 EDT --- soory i have write: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch but i would say: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/spe-0.8.4.h-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050118.n151IQVM010413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-04 20:18:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330953) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330953) spec file patch - cleanups Please find attached a small patch for the spec which makes rpmlint happier. There are some errors left: rpmlint of dump: dump.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/dumpdates dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency bzip2-libs dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency e2fsprogs-libs dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsepol dump.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib I can understand the need of the zero-length dumpdates, but I do not understand why does the spec say: # This Requires is now mandatory because we only ship static binaries, and # need to ensure the "disk" group is created before installation (#60461) Requires: setup, e2fsprogs-libs, zlib, bzip2-libs, device-mapper Requires: rmt, libselinux, libsepol, glibc but later on you do: %configure --disable-static \ Of course rpmbuild picks all requires automatically, so I guess you should drop either the explicit requires or the --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050118.n151ImOX010466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 01:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] New: Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 Summary: Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-cola/git-cola.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-cola/git-cola-1.3.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A sweet, carbonated git gui known for its sugary flavour and caffeine-inspired features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050209.n1529G8G024863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:09:15 EDT --- perl-Test-Email-0.04-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050210.n152AXA5025531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:10:32 EDT --- giver-0.1.8-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050208.n1528Qq3024646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:08:26 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050210.n152A3Re025348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:10:02 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050209.n1529eSO024969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:09:37 EDT --- libproxy-0.2.3-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476440] Review Request: latexdiff - Determine and mark up significant differences between latex files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050211.n152Bc3m025912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476440 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:11:36 EDT --- latexdiff-0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050207.n1527qdO018804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050207.n1527njG018765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:07:47 EDT --- mingw32-pixman-0.13.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050210.n152A5xL025385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050211.n152BHd6020043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:11:16 EDT --- tex-musixtex-0.114-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050208.n1528Tga024681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050209.n1529JLx019190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050211.n152BKDk020082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050209.n1529hdJ019282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050210.n152Aa7S019875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050208.n1528gLf024732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:08:41 EDT --- whohas-0.22-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update whohas'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1209 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050211.n152B0D1019952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:10:59 EDT --- whohas-0.22-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update whohas'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050209.n1529nGm019314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:09:48 EDT --- python-ferari-0.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-ferari'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:08:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050208.n15287aO018854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:08:05 EDT --- pysnmp-2.0.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pysnmp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1202 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050209.n1529285019053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:09:01 EDT --- python-fiat-0.3.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-fiat'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050214.n152E6eW026814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:14:05 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DIao026620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:17 EDT --- sj-fonts-2.0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DZDA026723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:35 EDT --- vhybridize-0.5.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050211.n152BpO4026061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:11:50 EDT --- vhybridize-0.5.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050214.n152EbPT026892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:14:36 EDT --- gsh-0.3-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152C4Bv026351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:00 EDT --- python-ldaphelper-1.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481484] Review Request: sj-fonts - Two fonts by Steve Jordi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DKPd026657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481484 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152D2p3026565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050215.n152FSfP027409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:14:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050214.n152EeWo026927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DXK7026696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:32 EDT --- pdfshuffler-0.3.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pdfshuffler'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050215.n152FPAW021942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:15:25 EDT --- botan-1.8.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152Cx1N020979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:58 EDT --- beesu-2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DRvc021109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:26 EDT --- tex-musixtex-0.114-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CrTe026497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:52 EDT --- pdfshuffler-0.3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfshuffler'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1258 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476660] Review Request: rubygem-restr - Simple client for RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050214.n152EItH021293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476660 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:14:18 EDT --- rubygem-restr-0.4.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CHxs020740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:16 EDT --- allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050215.n152Fn7i022056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:15:48 EDT --- python-ldaphelper-1.0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481509] Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050211.n152BsUw020266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CKrK020776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475116] Review Request: python-ldaphelper - a wrapper around python-ldap search results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152C7Xw020642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475116 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:14:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050214.n152EQwt021332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:14:25 EDT --- qtgpsc-0.2.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qtgpsc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CDEb020704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:12 EDT --- jeuclid-3.1.3-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jeuclid'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1249 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:12:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050212.n152CThL020846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:12:28 EDT --- timespan-2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update timespan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152DlCh021165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:46 EDT --- qtgpsc-0.2.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update qtgpsc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1274 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050213.n152Dp3l021198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:13:49 EDT --- php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-imagick'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152LPpd030041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:21:23 EDT --- python-py-0.9.2-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050217.n152HsfD028416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050220.n152Keag029762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:20:39 EDT --- pysnmp-2.0.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pysnmp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1338 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482880] Review Request: perl-Sane - Access SANE-compatible scanners with perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050217.n152Hq2E022930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482880 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:17:51 EDT --- perl-Sane-0.02-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:19:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050219.n152JgZp023794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:19:41 EDT --- mingw32-libjpeg-6b-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050220.n152Kp10029829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:20:50 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050217.n152H6YV022718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:17:03 EDT --- purple-msn-pecan-0.0.17-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050219.n152Juj0029196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:19:55 EDT --- timespan-2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update timespan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1328 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152LSGl024631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050219.n152JjFd023837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152LKaQ024599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:21:19 EDT --- python-fiat-0.3.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-fiat'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050220.n152KBGG024280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:20:10 EDT --- python-ferari-0.0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-ferari'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1332 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:19:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050219.n152JZdW029128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:19:34 EDT --- torch-3.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update torch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152LgcL024727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:21:41 EDT --- nullmodem-0.0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nullmodem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050217.n152HW1b022814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:17:31 EDT --- php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-pecl-imagick'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1312 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481564] Review Request: bind-to-tinydns - Convert DNS zone files in BIND format to tinydns format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050220.n152KZHI029729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481564 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:20:34 EDT --- bind-to-tinydns-0.4.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bind-to-tinydns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050223.n152NC9C031250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:23:11 EDT --- botan-1.8.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482902] Review Request: gsh - aggregate several remote shells into one In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050224.n152OpGA031802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482902 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:24:50 EDT --- gsh-0.3-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474412] Review Request: giver - A simple file sharing desktop application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050222.n152Mxx7031179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474412 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:22:58 EDT --- giver-0.1.8-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050224.n152OU1A031741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:24:29 EDT --- allgeyer-fonts-5.002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050223.n152NJLE031291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:23:18 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dustin-domestic-manners-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050221.n152Ljp3030203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:21:44 EDT --- perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Network-IPv4Addr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481389] Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050224.n152OaUq026121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:24:35 EDT --- beesu-2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475897] Review Request: ncmpcpp - Clone of ncmpc with new features and written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050225.n152PFre026625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475897 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:25:14 EDT --- ncmpcpp-0.2.5-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050225.n152PL9x026676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:25:20 EDT --- python-instant-0.9.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-instant'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050225.n152P59A026479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:25:05 EDT --- perl-Network-IPv4Addr-0.05-13.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update perl-Network-IPv4Addr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050223.n152N8k1025597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:23:07 EDT --- nullmodem-0.0.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update nullmodem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1371 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 02:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050225.n152PB3G026512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-04 21:25:10 EDT --- python-instant-0.9.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-instant'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 03:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050341.n153fEbV009376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #20 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-04 22:41:13 EDT --- changed scriptlets new version here. http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.23-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 05:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050501.n1551BHH022796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 _pjp_ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.c | |o.in) | --- Comment #35 from _pjp_ 2009-02-05 00:01:07 EDT --- Hey hi, (In reply to comment #34) > any news about daemontools ? Sorry, got a little busy with other work, will start working on it real soon. I had one more doubt about svscanboot, is it really required? I think we can very well do without it. It's just djbs way of starting services. And needless to say it's just not as user friendly to buy. I was also working of using /sbin/services. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 05:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226463] Merge Review: system-config-netboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050537.n155bK6U000737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226463 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 00:37:18 EDT --- package is in rawhide. Closing this review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 05:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050550.n155oMfk003305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #13 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-05 00:50:21 EDT --- OK.. Milos... Done. Jaroslav... OK Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2c-2.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2c-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 06:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050605.n1565H5J001312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #14 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-05 01:05:16 EDT --- Oh.. Jaroslav.. By the way... In case you missed it... Rex has sponsored me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 08:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050842.n158gwXS031712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327312|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 08:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 03:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050844.n158i6QK026893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-05 03:44:05 EDT --- Rahul, could you apply the above suggested changes please to keep the review moving? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 09:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 04:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050914.n159EYV8006222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #13 from Zdenek Prikryl 2009-02-05 04:14:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thank you for going on, rpmlint against latest CVS build (from http:// > cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/gpm/gpm.spec?revision=1.69) > > > gpm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgpm.so.2.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > > Any ideas for this? That really looks strange to me - and I do not really > have a clue what causes this. See also below at the bottom of this comment. This is caused by exit() function. If something goes wrong, libgpm calls exit(). This isn't standard library behaviour. Even in the source code there is a comment that mentions this fact. But anyway, right now there isn't a easy way how to get rid of exit() calls. I mean, if we want to remove calls, we'll have to change an architecture of library's reporting stuff. So, IMO we can ignore this warning. > > > %__cc %{?_smp_mflags} -o inputattach %{SOURCE2} > > Well, we've lost $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. See build logs: %{?_smp_mflags} only causes > -jX, not the rest of the flags $RPM_OPT_FLAGS would bring. So please re-add. Right, re-added. > Could you perform real integer comparisons rather half string comparisions? > > -if [ "$1" = "0" ]; then > +if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then > > -if [ "$1" -ge "1" ]; then > +if [ $1 -ne 0 ]; then I had a conversation about this and string comparison is safer than integer comparison. So that's why I prefer this. > > Following is suggested to not break rpm transaction if something goes wrong: > > -/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/gpm.info.gz --delete %{_infodir}/dir > +/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/gpm.info.gz --delete %{_infodir}/dir || : IMO, if something goes wrong, user has to be notified. I committed spec with corrections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 09:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 04:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050916.n159GfMc001505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-05 04:16:40 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines > SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. > A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. tex-musixtex-doc cannot even be installed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 09:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 04:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226277] Merge Review: perl-RPM-Specfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050926.n159QDFC003769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226277 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-05 04:26:12 EDT --- Ok, now we can close it because problem with EPEL/RHEL will be solved in different tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 09:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 04:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902050945.n159jAIZ013138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-05 04:45:08 EDT --- I'm not sure about flags changes but we can deal with it later - it's not a blocker for me. APPROVED Eli, you can move on now ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 10:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051018.n15AIrOF020175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #10 from Jerome Soyer 2009-02-05 05:18:52 EDT --- Hi, I put a new SRPM and a new SPEC at : http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-bicyclerepair-0.9-3.fc11.src.rpm http://saispo.fedorapeople.org/python-bicyclerepair.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 10:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051025.n15AP4cd016692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #16 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-05 05:25:03 EDT --- Thanks Jaroslav. Now its up to me to set the fedora-cvs request flag? Correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 10:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051055.n15AtV7b022848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-05 05:55:30 EDT --- If "/sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/gpm.info.gz --delete %{_infodir}/dir" fails, this will make rpm and yum breaking the transaction and thus not updating or deleting. the package and leave stuff in a not-very-well-state. Printing the error will be independent of that, but updating/uninstalling will work then; a thing which we should avoid (otherwise user needs rpm --noscripts etc.). Rest of your explanations is accepted and/or verified in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 10:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051059.n15AxpTh023329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |SystemTapGuiServer |systemtapguiserver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 11:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051102.n15B2SpP024161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #5 from Anithra 2009-02-05 06:02:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/systemtapguiserver.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/systemtapguiserver-1.0-2.src.rpm The package includes changes to the Makefile and spec as per Will's comments. The warnings have been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 11:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:23:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226162] Merge Review: mtools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051123.n15BN0Nh000761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226162 --- Comment #6 from Adam Tkac 2009-02-05 06:22:59 EDT --- Ed, are you going to review mtools, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 11:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051123.n15BNGeD028163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #36 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-05 06:23:15 EDT --- > I had one more doubt about svscanboot, is it really required? I think yes for compatibility with alot of howto's in the world. and if you don't do this now you're probably never do, there are alot of howtos about qmail,djbdns, vpopmail, and others saying to start the services creating a symlink, something like this. ln -s /etc/dnscache /service ln -s /etc/tinydns /service but you should not use /service directory, you need something like /var/run/daemontools or /var/lib/daemontols or something else, ask Mamoru he is the best person to answer what's the best location. I think we can > very well do without it. It's just djbs way of starting services. And needless > to say it's just not as user friendly to buy. I was also working of using > /sbin/services. feel free to do this, this is the recommended way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 11:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051142.n15BgU6f032223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac 2009-02-05 06:42:28 EDT --- Thanks for specfile patch, it's ok. I removed explicit requires as well so dump-0.4b41-10.fc11 should be sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 11:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051150.n15BoiHK001614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 11:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 06:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051154.n15BsoM1002085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 06:54:49 EDT --- One more thing, probably minor: in the build.log I see: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-dumpdates Leftover from a previous version ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 12:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051202.n15C2Lq0003795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-05 07:02:17 EDT --- so, can you please remove out the usure files (if uncertain: every) so the package got imported in fedora. Please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 12:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051228.n15CSY7q008875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac 2009-02-05 07:28:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > One more thing, probably minor: in the build.log I see: > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-dumpdates > > Leftover from a previous version ? ah, that option has been changed to "--with-dumpdatespath" but we don't need it at all, it is set correctly by default. I commited removal to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 12:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484202] New: Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-JSON/perl-Test-JSON.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-JSON/perl-Test-JSON-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) is a lightweight data interchange format. Test::JSON makes it easy to verify that you have built valid JSON and that it matches your expected output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 12:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051240.n15Cew1L011728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 07:40:57 EDT --- excellent. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051304.n15D4mc9020906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 08:04:47 EDT --- is there any updated package now for review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051305.n15D58wS021275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 08:05:07 EDT --- is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051304.n15D4JTx020798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 08:04:18 EDT --- can you request cvs by setting fedora-cvs? flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051306.n15D6FLU017335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 08:06:14 EDT --- any updates here now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051307.n15D7UK7021759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 08:07:29 EDT --- Is this built for requested branches? If yes then can we close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225711] Merge Review: dump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051309.n15D9VSi022073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225711 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Adam Tkac 2009-02-05 08:09:30 EDT --- Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051314.n15DEMfk023364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Sarantis Paskalis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051314.n15DEN5j023392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Bug 480887 depends on bug 481071, which changed state. Bug 481071 Summary: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051313.n15DDiYV023219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #12 from Sarantis Paskalis 2009-02-05 08:13:43 EDT --- True, I didn't catch this. Please place spaces in the doc subpackage in the Requires: line as in: --- tex-musixtex.spec 3 Feb 2009 16:47:29 -0000 1.2 +++ tex-musixtex.spec 5 Feb 2009 13:08:40 -0000 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ %package doc Summary: Documentation for %{name} Group: Applications/Publishing -Requires: %{name}=%{version}-%{release} +Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} %description doc MusicTeX provides TeX extensions for music typesetting. It allows you to use (and bump the release number to reflect this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051312.n15DCQII019008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-05 08:12:25 EDT --- ping? Can you request cvs now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051313.n15DDoqm019234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Bug 482856 depends on bug 482863, which changed state. Bug 482863 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482863] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Daemonize - Role for daemonizing your Moose based application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051313.n15DDnKJ019201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482863 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-05 08:13:48 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7616 Sorry, I forgot to close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051323.n15DN5Gv025713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-05 08:23:04 EDT --- I'll make soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051335.n15DZqrP024647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 --- Comment #15 from Zdenek Prikryl 2009-02-05 08:35:51 EDT --- Ok, it seems reasonable. Committed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051332.n15DWCjd023783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |eclipse-SystemTapGui - GUI |eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI |interface for SystemTap |interface for SystemTap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051338.n15Dc709028783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #13 from Anithra 2009-02-05 08:38:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I like systemtapgui 'cause it's consistent with the rest of the Eclipse > packages to have all lower case but I won't raise a stink since it's not in the > guidelines :) changed the package name to lowercase SPEC URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Should I be including a shell script for fetching the source?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:43:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051343.n15Dhoos029845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 08:43:49 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Looks good as always. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051345.n15DjeDX026561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-05 08:45:39 EDT --- http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/gpm/gpm.spec?revision=1.71 seems now fine to me, thus APPROVED. Please close this bug report, once you've built the changes in Rawhide. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225744] Merge Review: fbset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051352.n15DqfEQ031562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225744 --- Comment #4 from Adrian Reber 2009-02-05 08:52:40 EDT --- There is something in the guidelines about %makeinstall: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used The right thing, to conform with the guidelines would be to use: make install sysconfdir=%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir} sbindir=%{buildroot}%{_sbindir} mandir=%{buildroot}%{_mandir} Although, that makes it pretty unreadable. I would say it is up to you which one you like better. And I have seen this: MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. There is tracker bug for s390 at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467765 Please create a bug blocking that one and mention the bug near the ExcludeArch line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 13:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051350.n15Do8WA031076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-05 08:50:07 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-POE/perl-MooseX-POE.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-POE/perl-MooseX-POE-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051402.n15E21KV001452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-05 09:02:00 EDT --- Upstream clarified the legal issues and released a new zip file with the licensing accurately described. I've updated the package to reflect the new zip file: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-1.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051404.n15E4EBf001887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:04:13 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Please look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages for how to use version and release tags on pre-released software. For example Version: 1 Release: 0.1.20090126git - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Just need to fix Version and Release tags everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051408.n15E81xM031971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:08:00 EDT --- Source RPM for Fedora 10 SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel-0.2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051411.n15EBm0i000569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:11:47 EDT --- 1.5.8 was released some months ago and I think that making a review for 1.5.7 makes no sense because with 1.5.8 all patches go away. What is about using 'redhat-starthere' or a similar icon as a temporary replacement till gpscorrelate have its own icon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226162] Merge Review: mtools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051420.n15EK1Ju005859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226162 --- Comment #7 from Ed Hill 2009-02-05 09:20:00 EDT --- Yes, I'll do it this weekend! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051420.n15EK73W006188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051426.n15EQ8DU007710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #37 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 09:26:07 EDT --- just because DJB decided to ignore FHS and invent his own way of starting daemons and that those inventions were described in number of howtos is no reason to use the same non-sense in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051423.n15EN9lJ006918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:23:07 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Please look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages ?for how to use version and release tags on pre-released software. ? ? For example ? Version: 1 Release: 0.1.20090126git - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051424.n15EOWP9003296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:24:31 EDT --- Just need to fix Version and Release tags everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051430.n15EU9uo004668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051428.n15ESLKG004182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:28:20 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Looks good as always. ?Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051433.n15EXCDQ009013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:33:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-help Short Description: Help and Dokumentation for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483159] Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051436.n15EaJK6009899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483159 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:36:18 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Looks good as always. ?Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482951] Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051434.n15EYbBL005511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482951 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:34:36 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Looks good as always. ?Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:31:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481819] Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051431.n15EVraZ005086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481819 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:31:51 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Looks good as always. ?Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051441.n15EfUx9011116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 09:41:29 EDT --- Is there a specific reason to not use the latest version ( http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/gipfel-0.2.6.tar.gz ) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051440.n15EeN2c010851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-05 09:40:22 EDT --- Disabled BUILD_OPTIMIZE=DEBUG which produces unwanted debugging messages for developers of the compiler. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2.1-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051439.n15EdX0L010413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-05 09:39:32 EDT --- This new rpm has all the problems fixed. I have opened a bug upstream with the mismatched licenses. Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libfli.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libfli-1.7-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051438.n15EcIpK006470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 09:38:16 EDT --- I'd say that GenericName=Genomic sequences viewer Comment=Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences Icon=redhat-starther is a bit odd for gipsel :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483162] Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051438.n15Ec9ok006398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483162 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:38:08 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 warning, but not an issue - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Looks good as always. ?Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051445.n15EjteT008497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-05 09:45:54 EDT --- Oh(In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Should I be including a shell script for fetching the source?. > > Yes, please do. Oh, I didn't realize you made a source tarball available upstream. That is preferable and you don't need a shell script in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:44:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051444.n15Eim26011764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-05 09:44:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I like systemtapgui 'cause it's consistent with the rest of the Eclipse > > packages to have all lower case but I won't raise a stink since it's not in the > > guidelines :) > > changed the package name to lowercase Thanks. > Should I be including a shell script for fetching the source?. Yes, please do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483162] Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051450.n15EoiEI013306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483162 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:50:43 EDT --- Thanks for the review, for all reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:53:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482951] Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051453.n15ErfPX013978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482951 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:53:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-playgo Short Description: Go for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483162] Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051452.n15Eq39M013705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483162 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:52:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-xomail Short Description: Xomail for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483159] Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051452.n15Eqgdm010240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483159 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:52:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-xoirc Short Description: IRC client for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481819] Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051454.n15EsH9d010474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481819 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 09:54:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-finance Short Description: Financial planning for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051456.n15Eu19F011069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-05 09:55:59 EDT --- rpmlint output clean - OK licenses reported upstream - OK md5sum match - OK macros - OK for me it's OK and as it's blocker for kde42 release I think it's not a problem to approve it now, we can deal with license issue later APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 14:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051456.n15EuDk4011119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 09:56:12 EDT --- Still looking over the SPEC file however as is will not build in Koji for F10 or rawhide. See buildlogs F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1107030&name=build.log Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1107013&name=build.log Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051500.n15F0YkV015496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 10:00:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-pippy Short Description: Pippy for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051509.n15F9rO0018723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 10:09:52 EDT --- Everything seems OK, please update to 0.2.6 and I'll come back with a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051514.n15FEElZ016610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #17 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-05 10:14:13 EDT --- Yes, go ahead and set fedora-cvs to "?". Please copy the "New Package CVS Request" to your comment once again so as not to confuse the CVS administrators. You should also consider an F-9 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051502.n15F2dEl016053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-05 10:02:38 EDT --- The package looks good. There are just a few small things that need to be taken care of: - the summary should be more generic. Something like: "Eclipse plugins for SystemTap" - the description expand upon the summary. Something like: "Eclipse plugins providing IDE integration and visualization tools for SystemTap" - you need a 1: epoch prefix for the BR: java-devel. It should be >= 1:1.5.0 - this is an upstream issue so it doesn't really affect this review but I don't think the namespace and source tarball should be named "org.eclipse..." if it's not hosted at eclipse.org - add a line in %files for marking the license as documentation: %doc org.eclipse.systemtapgui.systemtap.feature/epl-v10.html - it seems odd to me that there's no BuildRequires on jsch but there is a Requires: jsch - looking in the error log, I see that there are some issues with the plugins' key bindings. These should be fixed but are upstream issues and won't block this review. - it would be nice if we could fix the NPEs that happen when double-clicking on a probe point in the Probe Alias view: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.systemtapgui.generic.editor.actions.file.NewFileAction.queryFile(NewFileAction.java:28) at org.eclipse.systemtapgui.generic.editor.actions.file.OpenFileAction.run(OpenFileAction.java:50) at org.eclipse.systemtapgui.systemtap.ide.actions.hidden.ProbeAliasAction.run(ProbeAliasAction.java:97) at org.eclipse.systemtapgui.systemtap.ide.views.ProbeAliasBrowserView$1.doubleClick(ProbeAliasBrowserView.java:71) at [...] Aside from these issues, everything looks good from a packaging standpoint. It won't take much to get this into shape for acceptance into Fedora. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051524.n15FOkth021057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-05 10:24:45 EDT --- You didn't paste rpmlint output. However it seems okay: eina.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/liblomo-1.0.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 eina-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The spec file needs some work, however. - The patch has no explanation. Why do you need it? - Disable building static libraries with %configure --disable-static - After that, you may need to remove the .la files manually http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and you can remove the %files sections relating .a and .la files. - Package does not use Fedora optimization flags. Use make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" - The desktop file has to be handled, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files - %files section is *awfully* messy, I can't figure out what it says. Either list all files, or use wildcards and a couple of excludes. Don't use %{dir}. - Main package has a couple of .so files, these should be in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051535.n15FZgPr025105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #18 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-05 10:35:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Yes, go ahead and set fedora-cvs to "?". Please copy the "New Package CVS > Request" to your comment once again so as not to confuse the CVS > administrators. > You should also consider an F-9 branch. Thanks for this comment, Eli should request f-9 and f-10 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051531.n15FVwBi024940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-05 10:31:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libfli Short Description: Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051536.n15Fak3T026253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-05 10:36:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew Short Description: Removes the KDE Plasma Cashew From the Corner of the Display Owners: eliwap Branches: f-9 f-10 InitialCC: jreznik rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484226] New: Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Summary: Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/ruby-icon-artist.spec SRPM URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Supporting libraries for icon artist scripts. It contains support for generating new icons from templates, exporting PNGs and SVGs from one canvas SVG, creating new icon theme and managing icon theme buildsys. In our repository it will be primary useful for the next stable release of echo-artist scripts. Documentation: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/icon-artist/doc/index.html Note: it's my first library written in ruby as well as my first package of such library, so maybe more throughout review by experienced ruby developer/packager would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051542.n15Fga7n026860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |alpine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] New: Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Summary: Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/qbittorrent-1.3.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: A Bittorrent client using C++ / rb_libtorrent and a Qt4 Graphical User Interface. It aims to be as fast as possible and to provide multi-OS, unicode support. I already maintain the fedora packages for the Qbittorrent site. http://qbittorrent.sourceforge.net/download.php I also need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051517.n15FHgfS017680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 --- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-02-05 10:17:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Hi, you are right, I'm maintaining kbd currently. > rpmlint is not really happy at all: > rpmlint of source RPM: > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some package), what do you think? > kbd.src:23: E: prereq-use initscripts >= 5.86-1 Fixed (changed to plain Requires). > kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz > kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz > kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz > kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this. > kbd.src: W: no-url-tag There's no kbd homepage. > > rpmlint of kbd: > kbd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/kbd-1.15/ChangeLog Fixed. > kbd.x86_64: W: no-url-tag See above. > > > I think that --localedir=/usr/share/locale should be replaced with > --localedir=%_datadir/locale Fixed. > > At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I > suggest to also add doc/dvorak I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051554.n15Fsu1d029940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-05 10:54:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331005) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331005) This patch removes country flags Try this patch - it changes country flags to country code... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:00:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478382] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-edit - A music and sound exploration application for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051600.n15G05FB032056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478382 --- Comment #3 from Aleksey Lim 2009-02-05 11:00:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Shouldn't the url be 'Url: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/TamTamEdit' ? > > - I would like to suggest that you change the %files section to the sample in > the Packaging Guidelines of the Sugar Activity [1]. This will make it easier > for reviewers. > > - I guess that 'Requires: sugar' is missing > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SugarActivityGuidelines now I'm waiting for authors' decision about merging branch(my packages based on) to trunk, after that I'm going re-upload all TamTam packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 15:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478381] Review Request: sugar-tamtam-common - Resources and python libraries for Sugar TamTam activities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051559.n15FxBOI031423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478381 --- Comment #2 from Aleksey Lim 2009-02-05 10:59:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > COPYING.txt says GPLv3 but TamTam*.activity/activity/activity.info says GPLv2+, > > so I use GPLv2+ in spec > > What did the upstream say about this? the right licence is GPLv3+, now I'm waiting for authors' decision about merging branch(my packages based on) to trunk, after that I'm going re-upload all TamTam packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051605.n15G50sC000809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-05 11:04:59 EDT --- BRs fixed. Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-cola/git-cola.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-cola/git-cola-1.3.5-2.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint spits out the following errors for all the scripts: git-cola.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/cola/controllers/search.py 0644 Following Bug #461483 I'll report upstream to have the shebang lines removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051607.n15G7SAF001903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2009-02-05 11:07:27 EDT --- Extra info I have used CFLAGS="%optflags" CXXFLAGS="%optflags" \ ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} In the spec file as %configure doesn't work + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules' + export FFLAGS + ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --prefix=/home/leigh/development/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qbittorrent-1.3.0-3.fc10.x86_64/usr Usage: ./configure [OPTION]... This script creates necessary configuration files to build/install. Main options: --prefix=[path] Base path for build/install. Default: /usr/local --bindir=[path] Directory for binaries. Default: PREFIX/bin --datadir=[path] Directory for data. Default: PREFIX/share --qtdir=[path] Directory where Qt is installed. --verbose Show extra configure output. --help This help text. Dependency options: --with-libtorrent-inc=[path] Path to libtorrent-rasterbar include files --with-libtorrent-lib=[path] Path to libtorrent-rasterbar library files --with-libtorrent-static-lib=[path] Path to libtorrent-rasterbar .a file --with-libboost-inc=[path] Path to libboost include files --with-libcurl-inc=[path] Path to libcurl include files --with-libcurl-lib=[path] Path to libcurl library files --disable-libzzip Disable use of libzzip --with-libzzip-inc=[path] Path to libzzip++ include files --with-libzzip-lib=[path] Path to libzzip++ library files + gmake -j3 gmake: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sj8MDC (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sj8MDC (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051608.n15G8I8n002047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-05 11:08:17 EDT --- And please correct URL in package - there's still bad one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051626.n15GQf20006891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-05 11:26:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dissy Short Description: Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 (In reply to comment #3) > I see Close button in About window not working. Thanks for noticing it. I have a fix, it will be applied upon import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051623.n15GNEGO006121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-05 11:23:14 EDT --- woo. minor suggestions: omit "using C++ Qt4" from summary/description. document, by adding a comment in %build section, about the non-use of %configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051627.n15GRUd5007112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-05 11:27:30 EDT --- 3. and drop the hardcoded Requires: qt-x11 >= 4.4.1 Requires: rb_libtorrent >= 0.14.1 Requires: python >= 2.5 Requires: curl Requires: boost Requires: qbittorrent-release These are all almost certainly not necessary, rpm's autoreq's should work. 4. Use BuildRequires: qt4-devel >= 4.4.1 omit BuildRequires: qt-x11 >= 4.4.1 (it's pulled in implicitly by qt4-devel already). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051643.n15Ghi9a010669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-05 11:43:43 EDT --- Good: + Local build works fine. + Build on koji works fine. + Rpmlint is silent for source and binary packages + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine. Bad: - Unncessary Provides - No subpackages emacs-python-bicyclerepair and vim-python-bicyciclyrepair for integration in emacs or vim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051644.n15Gi3Kg010463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-05 11:44:02 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 14 Shebang errors, - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Upstream the shebangs and everything should be good. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051652.n15GqOgx012828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-05 11:52:23 EDT --- Weird that none of us caught this before. Also weird that rpm can't handle this situation. Anyways, I fixed and built this for F-9, F-10 and rawhide. I hope it didn't cause much trouble to people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:57:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051657.n15GvnV2013589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #24 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-05 11:57:45 EDT --- Justin? What's the status of this? (In reply to comment #21) > * Categories=System;Emulator; > > The Categories in the desktop file should be changed to "Game;Emulator;". This > is what other emulators use. This is wrong and silly. System is perfectly valid: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-1.0.html#category-registry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051707.n15H7ddo016016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2009-02-05 12:07:38 EDT --- Update to 1.5.8: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate-1.5.8-1.tillf8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate.spec (In reply to comment #8) > What is about using 'redhat-starthere' or a similar icon as a temporary > replacement till gpscorrelate have its own icon? Why not, but is this a good choice? Afaics it is only provided by fedora-icon-theme, which probably is not allowed to be used on non official spins. But the logo itselfs looks nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051719.n15HJRkn018777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-05 12:19:26 EDT --- Patch for shebang lines added. Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-cola/git-cola.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/git-cola/git-cola-1.3.5-3.fc10.src.rpm Upstream report: http://cola.lighthouseapp.com/projects/22450/tickets/19-shebang-lines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051717.n15HHnGL018652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #17 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-05 12:17:48 EDT --- Ooops Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-4.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051723.n15HNZdd019698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #18 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-05 12:23:34 EDT --- Thanks for this... Seems that there is a problem with with it though as I get the following when trying to apply it. Patch #1 (translatoid-ban-flags.patch): + /bin/cat /home/eli/rpmbuild/SOURCES/translatoid-ban-flags.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0 The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff -up translatoid2/CMakeLists.txt.ban-flags translatoid2/CMakeLists.txt |--- translatoid2/CMakeLists.txt.ban-flags 2009-02-05 16:43:57.000000000 +0100 |+++ translatoid2/CMakeLists.txt 2009-01-30 22:08:11.000000000 +0100 -------------------------- File to patch: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051721.n15HLi0N019395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #4 from leigh scott 2009-02-05 12:21:43 EDT --- > document, by adding a comment in %build section, about the non-use of > %configure When I add # use ./configure instead of %configure as it doesn't work It causes this build error ( have I made a mistake ? ) + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CFLAGS + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + export CXXFLAGS + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/lib64/gfortran/modules' + export FFLAGS /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GnxZn6: line 48: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `'' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.GnxZn6 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051722.n15HMIgY018753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-05 12:22:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: git-cola Short Description: A highly caffeinated git gui Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051659.n15GxesW013973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #20 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-05 11:59:39 EDT --- Ahhh... OK. Thanks Jarosalv. I gotcha about the comment. Thanks for doing that for me. Eli -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481411] Review Request: perl-Test-Email - Test email contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051731.n15HVA3m021377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481411 Bug 481411 depends on bug 481410, which changed state. Bug 481410 Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051731.n15HVQdL021421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481410] Review Request: perl-Mail-POP3Client - Perl 5 module to talk to a POP3 (RFC1939) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051731.n15HV9bG021348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481410 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-05 12:31:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Is this built for requested branches? meanwhile, yes ... > If yes then can we close this review? This Fedora buildsys should learn to automatically close reviews <~~~ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 16:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051659.n15GxFDv013876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-05 11:59:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331032) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331032) proposal for scriptlets Well, about scriptlets: - When mydns is first installed: - For main package: - At pre, user/group must be registered. * "USERNAME" used here is wrong - At post, chkconfig, info must be called - After database subpackage is first installed: - At post, alternatives must be called - When mydns is upgraded: - For main package: - At post, chkconfig info must be called. - For database subpackage: - At post, alternatives must be called. - At postun: (here as this is "upgrading", $1 = 1) service mydns should be restared. - When removal: - When database subpackage is to be removed: - When the database to be removed is actually selected on alternatives, service must be stopped at preun - On the other hand, the other database is selected, there is no need that service should be stopped. - alternatives must be called at preun to unregister * service itself must not be removed on subpackage removal - When main package itself is to be removed - info must be unregistered at preun - For safety, I think stopping service also at preun of main package is reasonable - service must be unregistered at preun Note that I usually write "exit 0" at the end of the scriptlets to make it sure that scriptlets surely exit with success (even if some failure occured in the scriptlets) I attached the proposal for scriptlets. How do you think of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051732.n15HW85f021637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-05 12:32:08 EDT --- macros, even in comments, get expanded too. Use this instead: # use ./configure instead of %%configure as it doesn't work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051740.n15He6X5022365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-05 12:40:04 EDT --- Ping; Fabian, are you going to review the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051740.n15HefwI023231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #38 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-05 12:40:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > just because DJB decided to ignore FHS and invent his own way of starting > daemons and that those inventions were described in number of howtos is no > reason to use the same non-sense in fedora. I agree with you in some point. but I am asking only a sysv script to start svscanboot and a service directory in someplace, it's not much work, only 25-40 lines of code djbdns will take alot more of work than this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051741.n15HfGLl022583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:40:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: Qbittorrent - A lightweight bittorrent Client using C++ Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051740.n15He26X023160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #6 from leigh scott 2009-02-05 12:40:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > macros, even in comments, get expanded too. Use this instead: > # use ./configure instead of %%configure as it doesn't work Thanks Rex. Here are the new spec and srpm Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/qbittorrent-1.3.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051745.n15Hjxi7024172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 12:45:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'd say that > > GenericName=Genomic sequences viewer > Comment=Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences > Icon=redhat-starther > > is a bit odd for gipsel :) Yes, it is. (In reply to comment #7) > Is there a specific reason to not use the latest version ( > http://www.ecademix.com/JohannesHofmann/gipfel-0.2.6.tar.gz ) ? No Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gipfel-0.2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051746.n15Hk0YR024210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-05 12:45:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Created an attachment (id=330847) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330847) [details] > strace ouput while using synfig > > There is few things that I feel as very annoying for > * First there is the synfig_module.cfg needs: > usually libtool-ltdl modules doesn't need to be hardcoded in such file. That > will be hard to extend the functionnalities of synfig if we need to register > every module using this. > * Then, it seems that the modules implementation settle on the needs of the > libtool .la files. This is very annoying and needs to be fixed. Nicolas, could you concentrate on reviewing the package, not the upstream product? Both of these are issues that are indeed worth looking into, but they only the second one seems to be related to packaging to some extent. I'd like to get this in first and then help upstream solving the issues with their product. See, there's little point in insisting the product is perfect when entering fedora and I doubt whether we'd have any packages at all if we did this for all packages ;) Thanks for pointing at the issues though, I'll try to follow up on them shortly, but please don't let it block you from doing a full review :o) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051750.n15Ho989025179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Qbittorrent |Review Request: qbittorrent |- A lightweight bittorrent |- A bittorrent Client |Client using C++ Qt4 | Alias| |qbittorrent --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-05 12:50:07 EDT --- Adjusting bz Summary to match spec. If the qBittorrent.desktop file contains MimeTypes= (I assume it does, for .torrent files), then you probably ought to include scriptlets to update the system file associations: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 17:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051755.n15Ht2dU026145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #8 from leigh scott 2009-02-05 12:55:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Adjusting bz Summary to match spec. > > If the qBittorrent.desktop file contains MimeTypes= (I assume it does, for > .torrent files), then you probably ought to include scriptlets to update the > system file associations: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database Yes it does, I will make the necessary changes . [leigh at localhost applications]$ cat '/home/leigh/development/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/usr/share/applications/qBittorrent.desktop' [Desktop Entry] Categories=Qt;Network;P2P; Comment=V1.2.0 Exec=qbittorrent %f GenericName=Bittorrent client GenericName[bg]=?????? ?????? GenericName[de]=Bittorren Client GenericName[el]=?????? ??????? GenericName[es]=Cliente Bittorrent GenericName[fr]=Client Bittorrent GenericName[it]=Client Bittorrent GenericName[ja]=Bittorrent ?????? GenericName[ko]=???? ????? GenericName[nl]=Bittorrent client GenericName[pl]=Klient Bittorrent GenericName[ru]=?????? Bittorrent GenericName[sv]=Bittorrent-klient GenericName[tr]=Bittorrent istemcisi GenericName[uk]=Bittorrent-?????? GenericName[zh]=Bittorrent??? Icon=qbittorrent MimeType=application/x-bittorrent; Name=qBittorrent Name[ko]=????? Terminal=false Type=Application X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.15 [leigh at localhost applications]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051800.n15I0DNh026168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #9 from leigh scott 2009-02-05 13:00:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Adjusting bz Summary to match spec. > What does this mean ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051801.n15I1QZF026454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #39 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 13:01:25 EDT --- We already have sysinit and upstart which are the only recommended and supported methods to start daemons. What you ask for is yet another service daemon and not only that but one which violates our guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051806.n15I6Dmb028170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2009-02-05 13:06:12 EDT --- Here are the new spec and srpm Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_1/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_1/qbittorrent-1.3.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051803.n15I3j2L026720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-05 13:03:44 EDT --- I adjusted the Summary of this bz ticket no longer include "using C++ Qt4", to match the "Summary:" tag in qbittorrent.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051808.n15I8WjH028480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #70 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-05 13:08:27 EDT --- package ETL is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051806.n15I6sOx027628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-05 13:06:52 EDT --- well, okay the spec file itself it beautiful. But in when I'm reviewing a package, then i consider the software as a whole. (guidelines includes usability tests after all). Now I've never said that the first issue was a blocker nor that the above remarks constitutes a full review, indeed. Actually I still need a usability test for ETL at this time... I will assume it is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051814.n15IEPRr029237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #40 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-05 13:14:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > We already have sysinit and upstart which are the only recommended and > supported methods to start daemons. What you ask for is yet another service > daemon and not only that but one which violates our guidelines. I agree with you in some point, but the intention is to make all packages work out of the box without much work. in the future someone will report a bug and ask, where are the service directory ? look https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/daemontools-installer/+bug/66615 feel free to take over, the package seems to be good, but for me is missing this detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051828.n15ISxcg031943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #25 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-02-05 13:28:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > > * Categories=System;Emulator; > > > > The Categories in the desktop file should be changed to "Game;Emulator;". This > > is what other emulators use. > > This is wrong and silly. System is perfectly valid: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-1.0.html#category-registry Please don't put in my mouth words I haven't said. I haven't said that "System;Emulator" is not a valid option. I said that *in Fedora* all other emulators use "Game;Emulator;" therefore I said that it *should* be changed (because that is where the final user expects to find it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051835.n15IZ35t000782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #41 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 13:35:03 EDT --- yeah, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/daemontools-installer/+bug/66615/comments/11 is very informative. quote, for those who are not in the mood to visit that link: "The package has removed from Ubuntu Hardy and later versions. For this reason I am marking as Invalid." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051844.n15IihP4002347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-05 13:44:41 EDT --- I will wait for your new srpm with the issue I commented on comment 17 resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051843.n15IhUFt002170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-05 13:43:29 EDT --- Well, - This package itself is now good - For your other review requests: - I suggets that gdesklets related packages should be renamed to gdesklets-XXXXXX (there are already gdesklets-goodweather, gdesklets-quote-of-the-day on Fedora. It seems that both of these were reviewed by me....) - I suggest that earth-and-moon rpm should be renamed to earth-and-moon-backgrounds (as other packages do). You can check how other packages are renamed by $ rpm -qf /usr/share/backgrounds/* (note: please post new srpms or your comments for this package on the corresponding review request, not on "this" review ticket) ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (spe) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". I found a account on FAS (Fedora Account System) which is perhaps yours, however the mail account used on FAS differs from what you are using on this bugzilla. Both must be the same, so please fix the mail account used on FAS. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 18:55:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051855.n15ItepW005006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 13:55:39 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by the license tag: GPLv2+ License type: as specified by the sources: GPLv3+ ==> see note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: b12892834340323f38f60d2ce14df8f38aae9dfa gipfel-0.2.6.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [!] Package consistently uses macros. ==> see note 2 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. All source files reference the bundled COPYING file which is the stock GPLv3+ 2. please replace desktop-file-install --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} with the equivalent %{buildroot} command I am going to trust you to correct the above two issues before commit. I also suggest to use "[...] POI finder" instead of "[...] POI namer" in the desktop file. I am not a native speaker so I might be wrong, but "namer" sounds odd. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 19:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051928.n15JSf3H011082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 14:28:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools > > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open > > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools > > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open > OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm > just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on > Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some > package), what do you think? > According to: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires open --repoid=development [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires console-tools --repoid=development you can drop the Provides, too. No one seems to require them. > > kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz > > kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz > > kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz > > kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd > We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this. OK. > > kbd.src: W: no-url-tag > There's no kbd homepage. How about http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/legion/kbd ? > > At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I > > suggest to also add doc/dvorak > I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already > are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:) Well, say I'd like to give Dvorak a spin and I'll use it side by side with the normal QWERTY layout for a while. Wouldn't I need the docs? Having them on my system might be more convenient than browsing the net for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 19:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:34:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469998] Review Request: nightview - A general astronomical software package to control of a CCD camera In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902051934.n15JYxsW012186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469998 Bug 469998 depends on bug 478680, which changed state. Bug 478680 Summary: Jade keeps downloading DTDs from teh Internets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478680 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052016.n15KGNwt021334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 15:16:22 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will fix all issues before I import the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:17:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052017.n15KH5Lo021452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-05 15:17:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gipfel Short Description: A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052029.n15KTmYn023846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 J. Randall Owens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jrowens.fedora at ghiapet.net --- Comment #14 from J. Randall Owens 2009-02-05 15:29:47 EDT --- Not only that, but rpmlint doesn't catch it, either. Perhaps time to look into filing an enhancement request with rpmlint. Or even a patch; heck, I'm learning Python anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] New: Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Summary: Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmatthew at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jmatthews.fedorapeople.org/BareBonesBrowserLaunch/1.5/1/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec SRPM URL: http://jmatthews.fedorapeople.org/BareBonesBrowserLaunch/1.5/1/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Utility class to open a web page from a Swing application in the user's default browser. Supports: Mac OS X, GNU/Linux, Unix, Windows XP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052040.n15KerOt025163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 John Matthews changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484281] Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052051.n15KpasV028541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 John Matthews changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484281] New: Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 Summary: Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmatthew at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jmatthews.fedorapeople.org/jets3t/0.6.1/1/jets3t.spec SRPM URL: http://jmatthews.fedorapeople.org/jets3t/0.6.1/1/jets3t-0.6.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: JetS3t is a free, open-source Java toolkit and application suite for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3). The toolkit provides Java programmers with a powerful yet simple API for interacting with S3 and managing data stored there, while the applications allow anyone to easily manage and interact with their S3 accounts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484281] Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052053.n15KrxHk028926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 John Matthews changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484279 --- Comment #1 from John Matthews 2009-02-05 15:53:58 EDT --- This package depends on "BareBonesBrowserLaunch" which is under review, bug 484279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 20:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052054.n15Ks0Zn028947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 John Matthews changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052101.n15L1rHH030711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dodji at redhat.com) | --- Comment #17 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-05 16:01:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331051) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331051) Adds a cloog-config.h file to the distribution This patch creates a cloog-config.h file that contains the configuration macros for this package. It then removes the need to have -DFOO configuration macros passed at compile time. I guess it should fix the problem you raised with the cloog/cloog.h header as the user can know how the cloog library was configured. If this approach is okay with you I will forward the patch to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052104.n15L4OSB029889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #18 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-05 16:04:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331052) pass make distcheck This patch removes some files left in builddir after make clean. Those where preventing make distcheck to pass. I am stacking this here because I'd like to forward it to upstream. At least it won't be lost if it's here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052110.n15LAMa0031417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #19 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-05 16:10:21 EDT --- > This library actually calls exit() in the library (e.g. > source/names.c). This is unusual situation. Usually when some unexpected > behavior happens in a function in a library, the function should > return a value which tells the error or so and should call > exit() ($ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit shows the explanation). > Would you contact upstream? Yes, sure. Though is this a blocker for the package to be sponsored ? I mean this is typically something that can be fixed in a subsequent upstream release. The reason why I am being a bit dense on this is that there are lots of exit() calls in the library and changing those would require some real API design changes. Otherwise, I would have provided a patch myself already. I will batch forward this issue to upstream with the patch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331052 when you approve it. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052114.n15LEw0X000801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-05 16:14:57 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina-0.7.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Notes: - The plugins of Eina results in .so files under main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] New: Review Request: xconverse - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xconverse - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 Summary: Review Request: xconverse - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: randyn3lrx at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xconvers.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xconvers-0.8.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1105403 Description: Xconvers is a client to connect to a convers server (port 3600). In a split-screen session you can type text into the bottom screen. The reply from the server can be seen in the top screen. The current version features: color support, optional saving of the session to a logfile, history for the connect dialogue and the send widget and autologin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052129.n15LTNpo003917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xconverse - |Review Request: xconvers - |Ham radio convers client |Ham radio convers client |similar to IRC for X/GTK |similar to IRC for X/GTK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052137.n15LbUjE006079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-05 16:37:29 EDT --- - Why do you disable the GTK version check? - You need to have %{_datadir}/eina %{_libdir}/eina in the %files section, since the package has to own the directories it creates. - Put %defattr(-,root,root,-) in the devel files section, so that the attributes are the same as for the main package. - Changelog entries * Thu Feb 5 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.7.3-2 should be * Thu Feb 5 2009 Allisson Azevedo - 0.7.3-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] New: Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Time-Progress.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Time-Progress-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perl module to report progress. Reports elapsed and estimated finish time. Displays progress bar. This is needed by an update to SVK (#483772). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052155.n15Lt4cg009491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 21:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052158.n15LwNLb010189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-05 16:58:22 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina-0.7.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Notes: - This package not build for F-11 without this patch (F-10 and F-9 works without this patch). - The changelog format is valid, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 22:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052226.n15MQa75016620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-05 17:26:35 EDT --- Oh, that's right. No problem then. - Now you have two rel 3's in the changelog. Review: MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - Home page (1) states liblomo is under LGPL, but I can't find any mention of LGPL in the source files or the LGP license file. Thus License: GPLv2+ is OK. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, thus you should also use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of %{optflags} MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - You need Requires: pkgconfig MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - Fix this, too. rpmlint output: [jzlehtol at politzer RPMS]$ rpmlint * eina.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblomo-1.0.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 eina.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/eina ['/usr/lib64'] eina-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation eina.src:103: W: macro-in-%changelog files 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. - You need to patch libtool to get rid of the rpath. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath - You need to use %%files instead of %files in %changelog. OK'd items omitted. (1) http://eina.sourceforge.net/about.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 22:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430299] Review Request: compat-libgfortran-41 - Compatibility Fortran 95 runtime library version 4.1.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052254.n15MsYHT023431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430299 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 5 23:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902052319.n15NJFtW029060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-05 18:19:14 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/eina/eina-0.7.3-4.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Thu Feb 5 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.7.3-4 - Fix to consistently use macros. - Fix devel requires. - Disable Rpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:11:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060011.n160B4rG010353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476712] Package Review: lua-rex - Regular expression handling library for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060011.n160BbQm010470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476712 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:07:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060007.n1607IM4009618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060030.n160U1Ee013953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 19:30:00 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source RPM: perl-Time-Progress.noarch: W: invalid-license CHECK perl-Time-Progress.noarch: W: invalid-license Distributable binary RPM: perl-Time-Progress.noarch: W: invalid-license CHECK perl-Time-Progress.noarch: W: invalid-license Distributable [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type according to spec: CHECK(Distributable) License type according to source: same as perl [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f613a6607b17f1332b92eb5a02f5fc02cfd96dba Time-Progress-1.4.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested , but it's a standard perl module and should work anywhere [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check passes ===Issues=== The license tag is invalid. Please fix it. It would also be a good idea to mail the upstream author and ask him to include the license in the perl module itself, not only in the bundled README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484313] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Class-Can.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Class-Can-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Class::Can interrogates the object heirarchy of a package to return a hash detailling what methods the class could dispatch (as the key), and the package it found it in (as the value). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Class-Exporter.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Class-Exporter-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module makes it much easier to make a module have a hybrid object/method interface similar to the one of CGI.pm. You can take any old module that has an object- oriented interface and convert it to have a hybrid interface by simply adding "use base 'Class::Exporter'" to your code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060047.n160lsgo018153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 19:47:53 EDT --- /usr/share/xconvers/pixmaps/ /usr/share/xconvers/ are included but are not owned The rest seems OK, please fix that and I'll do a full review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 00:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484313] Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060057.n160vGc4020213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 19:57:14 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 8b3a10dbfa22550d71ab9d1b69603e334cc757e4 Class-Can-0.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060101.n1611CtY021181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223724 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |red at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Adam Goode 2009-02-05 20:01:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fvwm New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: agoode pertusus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484318] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484318 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-HTML-DOMbo.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-HTML-DOMbo-3.10-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class puts a method into HTML::Element called to_XML_DOM, and puts into the class XML::DOM::Node two methods, to_HTML_Element and to_XML_Element. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060110.n161AkoQ022892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 20:10:45 EDT --- koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1107988 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060107.n1617hRM022321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 20:07:41 EDT --- rpmlint is not so happy about the binary rpm: perl-Class-Exporter.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Class-Exporter-0.03/README perl-Class-Exporter.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Class/Exporter.pm please fix the permissions of the two files (remove the exec bit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484320] New: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484320 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball-0.952-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Stemming reduces related words to a common root form -- for instance, "horse", "horses", and "horsing" all become "hors". Most commonly, stemming is deployed as part of a search application, allowing searches for a given term to match documents which contain other forms of that term. This module is very similar to Lingua::Stem -- however, Lingua::Stem is pure Perl, while Lingua::Stem::Snowball is an XS module which provides a Perl interface to the C version of the Snowball stemmers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] New: Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Lingua-StopWords.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Lingua-StopWords-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: In keyword search, it is common practice to suppress a collection of "stopwords": words such as "the", "and", "maybe", etc. which exist in in a large number of documents and do not tell you anything important about any document which contains them. This module provides such "stoplists" in several languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:22:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484318] Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060122.n161MWEd025576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484318 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 20:22:31 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 4086ffad7688ecbb804e4de96c6ee81c9ad36735 HTML-DOMbo-3.10.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 01:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] New: Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Summary: Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-KinoSearch.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-KinoSearch-0.163-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: KinoSearch is a loose port of the Java search engine library Apache Lucene, written in Perl and C. The archetypal application is website search, but it can be put to many different uses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060218.n162IWiI004594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #23 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-02-05 21:18:31 EDT --- Used the 0%{?el4} convention. Since dns is needed for callback support, and callback are a highly useful function for milters, I decided to include the python-pydns dependency. For RHEL < 5 pydns in required instead, since python-pydns is always built for the system python. (Should we have a similar convention for python-pymilter vs pymilter?) Removed the % from %changelog. Removed the unused sitelib macro. Did not address the selinux issue. Could be a python-devel issue that is resolved in Fedora anyway. Will have to wait until the actual python milter applications are released for Fedora to test. http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.0-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484320] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060225.n162PMFK006092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484320 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:27:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060227.n162Rgnv006156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:43:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060243.n162h9Ah009219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:43:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060246.n162kCV1010016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:46:10 EDT --- cvs done. If this package was blocked, you may need to file a rel-eng ticket to unblock it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060250.n162owvD011031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 --- Comment #2 from Randall Berry 2009-02-05 21:50:56 EDT --- Thanks Wolfy, Should be fixed now Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xconvers.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xconvers-0.8.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483628] Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060248.n162m5kF010315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:48:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483649] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060249.n162nvpP010554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:49:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060247.n162lB1T010293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:47:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:50:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483657] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060250.n162opiF011167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483657 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:50:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483718] Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060251.n162plDh011316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:51:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482951] Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060256.n162uq9m012462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482951 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:56:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481819] Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060256.n162uE46012370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481819 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:56:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483723] Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060252.n162qa2D011504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:52:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060253.n162rXg2011632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:53:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060255.n162t84S012109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:55:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483162] Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060258.n162wone012585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483162 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:58:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 02:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483159] Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060258.n162w7tO012485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483159 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 21:58:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060300.n1630kT4013390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:00:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060301.n1631lGn013666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:01:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060302.n1632rAu013572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:02:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060308.n1638lu4014805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:08:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483641] Review Request: perl-Date-Tiny - Date object with as little code as possible In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060307.n1637h3E014675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483641 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:07:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060311.n163BA3c015532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:11:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223724] Review Request: fvwm - window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060315.n163F0Aa016323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223724 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:14:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:12:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060312.n163COqT015834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:12:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060313.n163DcNu016075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-05 22:13:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 03:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060331.n163VW6Z020093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #7 from Bernard Johnson 2009-02-05 22:31:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb-2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > > SONAME libzdb.so.4 > > By doing that, you've created a library that doesn't exist anywhere else. > Anything that would be built with it, would be incompatible with the real > libzdb as released by upstream. It's similar to packagers who invent a shared > library name and version when converting from a static-only package. > > Upstream really ought to be involved in such a decision. The library soname issue has been resolved. I'm applying a temporary patch until the next release. See: http://www.tildeslash.com/pipermail/libzdb-general/2009-February/000116.html > > > The package is licensed under GPLv3+ OR GPLv3 + exceptions. > > So far, you've included the EXCEPTIONS file in the package. That file modifies > the licencing by extending/changing the GPLv3. If those special terms and > conditions are met, the licencing would no longer be GPLv3. I'll block FE-LEGAL and try to get an opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060513.n165DKA8006931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #24 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-02-06 00:13:19 EDT --- Incorporated a bug fix. http://customdesigned.users.sourceforge.net/pymilter-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060519.n165JxwY008211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:19:58 EDT --- hatools-2.00-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060519.n165JFW2007997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:19:14 EDT --- tex-musixtex-0.114-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060519.n165JJc8008044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060517.n165HcKL007810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-06 00:17:37 EDT --- Add BR: perl(Test::More) as you can see build failed in make test http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1108448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060520.n165K2UU009354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060519.n165JNmI008802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:19:22 EDT --- libxnm-0.1.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libxnm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1392 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060519.n165JX2u008884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Bug 481508 depends on bug 481509, which changed state. Bug 481509 Summary: Review Request: vhybridize - Virtual Hybridization tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481509 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:19:32 EDT --- pipviewer-0.3.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update pipviewer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1394 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481071] Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060525.n165P3sk010445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:25:01 EDT --- tex-musixtex-0.114-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060523.n165N1C8009487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060524.n165OWXg010012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:24:32 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060522.n165MoR2009429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:22:49 EDT --- pipviewer-0.3.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pipviewer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060523.n165NWXG009643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:23:31 EDT --- libxnm-0.1.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libxnm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481501] Review Request: dustin-domestic-manners - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060522.n165MwqY010441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481501 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:22:57 EDT --- dustin-domestic-manners-fonts-20030527-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483026] Review Request: hatools - Improved shell scripting in High Availability environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060524.n165OtSB010870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483026 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-06 00:24:55 EDT --- hatools-2.00-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 05:53:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060553.n165rhT7016156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-06 00:53:42 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 06:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060602.n1662Ec3018194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-06 01:02:13 EDT --- Update for 0.25.90. No changes to packaging. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.90-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 06:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484320] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060612.n166C3hV020900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484320 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-06 01:12:01 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1108450 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6b0085c6fd8ec894e34c593078aa169a Lingua-Stem-Snowball-0.952.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=10237, 4 wallclock secs ( 1.37 usr 0.05 sys + 3.92 cusr 0.05 + Package perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball-0.952-1.fc11 => Provides: Snowball.so perl(Lingua::Stem::Snowball) = 0.952 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl >= 0:5.006002 perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1) remove following line from SPEC Requires: perl(Test::More) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 06:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 01:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060636.n166aEch025397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #42 from _pjp_ 2009-02-06 01:36:13 EDT --- Hello folks, Really pleased to see those comments and to know that I'm not the only one who thinks daemontools are redundant, cheers Manuel. :) So here is the deal, I'll make djbdns *free* of daemontools and integrate it with /sbin/services, so it works just like any other service. I'll see to it that the necessary steps are documented at the right places. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 07:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 02:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484331] New: Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guthrie at counterexample.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/perl-Sendmail-PMilter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/perl-Sendmail-PMilter-0.96-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: Sendmail::PMilter is a mail filtering API implementing the Sendmail milter protocol in pure Perl. This allows Sendmail servers (and perhaps other MTAs implementing milter) to filter and modify mail in transit during the SMTP connection, all in Perl. It should be noted that PMilter 0.90 and later is NOT compatible with scripts written for PMilter 0.5 and earlier. The API has been reworked significantly, and the enhanced APIs and rule logic provided by PMilter 0.5 and earlier has been factored out for inclusion in a separate package to be called Mail::Milter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 07:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 02:12:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060712.n167C4bt031993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-06 02:12:03 EDT --- - chrpath is a last resort. Please patch libtool instead as stated in the Packaging guidelines: %configure sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool You can do this once you import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 07:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 02:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060732.n167WQS4003261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #43 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-06 02:32:25 EDT --- Provided what you say, consider to close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 08:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060810.n168A5IL010645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-06 03:10:04 EDT --- As rawhide and upstream change, new versions of spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/02/fence-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/02/fence-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 08:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060808.n1688bKt010181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 --- Comment #1 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-06 03:08:36 EDT --- As rawhide and upstream change, new versions of spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/ras/02/resource-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/ras/02/resource-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 08:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483933] Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060820.n168KQG2012377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-06 03:20:25 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: d2813439a0da9b048cc1793af05b2144 for both N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done ../RPMS/i386/perl-autobox-2.55-1.i386.rpm autobox.so perl(autobox) = 2.55 perl-autobox = 2.55-1 = libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Scope::Guard) perl(Storable) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) ../RPMS/i386/perl-autobox-debuginfo-2.55-1.i386.rpm autobox.so.debug perl-autobox-debuginfo = 2.55-1 = rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 SHOULD Items: OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs FAIL - Should function as described. # perl -Mautobox -e 'my $range = 10->to(1); print $range;' Can't call method "to" without a package or object reference at -e line 1. # perl -Mautobox -e 'print $error = 3.1415927->minus(22/7)->abs();' Can't call method "minus" without a package or object reference at -e line 1. No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Strange is that tests passed, but example from documentation not. But maybe I'm doing something wrong. And it can be definitelly addressed as regular bug. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 08:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060856.n168uoxD021856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #44 from _pjp_ 2009-02-06 03:56:49 EDT --- > Provided what you say, consider to close this review request. Sure, will do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 08:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060857.n168vkBg022192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Bug 480724 depends on bug 480727, which changed state. Bug 480727 Summary: Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 08:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060857.n168viGc022154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 _pjp_ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 09:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060921.n169Lprg026885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #22 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 04:21:48 EDT --- OK... I think... I hope... I've managed (it would seem to get everything built successfully for devel F-9 and F-10. Everything is available in koji. under builds. However, under Tags I only see dist-9. I just want to make sure that I got everything right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 09:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483718] Review Request: hyphen-ca - Catalan hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060938.n169cXKW032007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483718 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 09:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483723] Review Request: mythes-bg - Bulgarian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060945.n169jGdh032180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483723 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 09:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902060953.n169rPEd002923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 04:53:24 EDT --- Ok, now you have to fill in new package update in Bodhi for both F-9 and F-10 (not for rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 10:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061021.n16ALWQB008823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #24 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 05:21:31 EDT --- Done. OK... I hope thats that... Wow.. Its a good thing to be able to contribute. But just a thought really... shuoldn't this process be a lot easier. I mean this should be go through a process to make sure you are who you say you are, then submit the appropriate files to the web interface and thats that. This process is way to convoluted. I feel like my head has been squeezed like a pimple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 10:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483575] Review Request: dissy - Graphical frontend to the objdump disassembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061043.n16Ah3q8015129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483575 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-06 05:43:01 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 10:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061042.n16AgZQd015047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-02-06 05:42:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools > > > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open > > > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools > > > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open > > OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm > > just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on > > Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some > > package), what do you think? > > > According to: > [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires open --repoid=development > [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires console-tools > --repoid=development > you can drop the Provides, too. No one seems to require them. Fixed. > > > > > > kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in > > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz > > > kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in > > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz > > > kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in > > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz > > > kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd > > We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this. > OK. > > > > > > kbd.src: W: no-url-tag > > There's no kbd homepage. > How about http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/legion/kbd ? Well, same URL is in source... But you're probably right, it's better for users than nothing. Fixed. > > > > > At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I > > > suggest to also add doc/dvorak > > I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already > > are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:) > Well, say I'd like to give Dvorak a spin and I'll use it side by side with the > normal QWERTY layout for a while. Wouldn't I need the docs? Having them on my > system might be more convenient than browsing the net for them. Fine, I see it might be useful, so it's added. All changes are written to the CVS, let me know if you have anything else. Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 10:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:56:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061056.n16AurN0018654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-06 05:56:52 EDT --- Builds fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7656 Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061103.n16B3gws020141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 06:03:40 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: b9ddacd937a4f12f105242bf9b1fb7b5c62866cf xconvers_0.8.3.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [!] Final provides and requires are sane. => See issue 1 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch disk [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch disk [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. There is a redundant Requires: gtk+. rpmbuild picks libgtk-1.2.so.0 automatically. === Final Notes === 1. Please consider adding INSTALL="install -p" to the make install line, in order to preserve the timestamps of the pixmaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061102.n16B2Rwf020000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #25 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 06:02:25 EDT --- You can match this #bz with updates in Bodhi. Yes, the process is really complicated but many steps are only one time. But this is not a good place to comment it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061109.n16B9En3019912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 06:09:12 EDT --- Nothing further, let's close it. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061123.n16BNVFm024566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 06:23:30 EDT --- You need -p1 not -p0 but still patch was bad - I reverted order for CMakeLists.txt. Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Patch URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid-ban-flags.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061130.n16BUvgw024781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-06 06:30:55 EDT --- Ralf you can remove FE-LEGAL http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-November/msg00023.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225958] Merge Review: kbd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061155.n16Bt5Lh029731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225958 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 11:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 06:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061155.n16BtSSj029809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #6 from MERCIER 2009-02-06 06:55:27 EDT --- i change the name of rpm citation to gdesklet-citation rpmlint issue: _____________________________________________________ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gdesklet-citation.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet- gdesklet-citation-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-citation-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-radar-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-citation-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.src.rpm gdesklet-slideshow-0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _____________________________________________________ link: http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-citation-1.3-6.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-citation.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061204.n16C4nU2031718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #14 from MERCIER 2009-02-06 07:04:46 EDT --- i have update the mail: bioinfornatics at gmail.com on my FAS account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061212.n16CCV5q002319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pdumpfs - |Review Request: pdumpfs - |Daily backup system similar |Daily backup system |to Plan9's dumpfs | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061219.n16CJxuh002370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #29 from MERCIER 2009-02-06 07:19:57 EDT --- I change the name of rpm SlideShow to gdesklet-SlideShow rpmlint issue: _____________________________________________________ $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gdesklet-SlideShow.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _____________________________________________________ http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-5.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/gdesklet-SlideShow.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:21:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061221.n16CLqKe004265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry 2009-02-06 07:21:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xconvers.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xconvers-0.8.3-4.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 - Randall J. Berry - 0.8.3-4 - edit spec per review - remove redundant require gtk+ - use INSTALL="install -p" to preserve pixmap timestamps - use original png for icon to preserve original time stamp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061236.n16CahhR007754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-06 07:36:42 EDT --- Can you please add a disttag (i.e. %{?dist})? As we'll also need this pushed out to F9 and F10, it will make managing the Release tag much easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061246.n16CkS3Q008314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-06 07:46:27 EDT --- Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vlgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese TrueType fonts Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061251.n16Cpqpt011329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #12 from Jerome Soyer 2009-02-06 07:51:50 EDT --- Ok, i see for building the ide-integration but emacs needs pymacs wich is not under Fedora but in the package, i made a subpackage emacs-pymacs or i drop emacs support from bicycle repair ? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061252.n16Cqa5p009618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 07:52:35 EDT --- No more blockers. package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061300.n16D0k52011571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 08:00:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/pango/mingw32-pango.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.22.1-4.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.22.1-4 - Requires pkgconfig. * Tue Jan 27 2009 Levente Farkas - 1.22.1-3 - Include license file in documentation section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061258.n16Cw6vJ012658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 07:58:03 EDT --- This has now been built in Rawhide, F-10 and EL-5. Thanks for everybody's help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061258.n16Cw90p012722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 467401, which changed state. Bug 467401 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467420 depends on bug 467416, which changed state. Bug 467416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 12:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061258.n16Cw7UR012683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Bug 467419 depends on bug 467402, which changed state. Bug 467402 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467419 depends on bug 467416, which changed state. Bug 467416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061305.n16D5b4p012947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 08:05:35 EDT --- Ops, good point, I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481544] Review Request: perl-Bio-Graphics - Generate GD images of Bio::Seq objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061305.n16D5oSB013007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481544 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-06 08:05:48 EDT --- Build done and available in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80541 Closing bug. (Will do F-10 and F-9 branches when perl-bioperl{-run} is officially released}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061303.n16D3VwO012270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Bug 467413 depends on bug 467396, which changed state. Bug 467396 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-freetype - Free and portable font rendering engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467413 depends on bug 467405, which changed state. Bug 467405 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 08:03:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/fontconfig/mingw32-fontconfig.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-rawhide/src/SRPMS/mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-7.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Jan 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.6.0-7 - Requires pkgconfig. * Fri Jan 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.6.0-6 - Use _smp_mflags. - Rebuild libtool configuration. - More BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061308.n16D8G8w013636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 08:08:15 EDT --- As Kevin Kofler mentioned in libfli review - please add %{?dist} tag to release. Koji build (dist-f11) - OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479982] Review Request: wxapt - A command line tool for decoding weather images transmitted by satellites. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061308.n16D8tXb013765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479982 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061307.n16D7jZe013535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061311.n16DBYlY014550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Randall Berry 2009-02-06 08:11:33 EDT --- Thanks again Wolfy :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xconvers Short Description: Ham radio convers client similar to IRC. Owners: dp67 Branches: F-9, F-10, devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061326.n16DQgnB018508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #20 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 08:26:41 EDT --- I just confirmed. The change you made did the trick. Since you already did this bit of work I should leave the urls that you provided as is. Is that correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061335.n16DZrpq021900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #21 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 08:35:52 EDT --- I just confirmed. The change you made did the trick. Since you already did this bit of work I should leave the urls that you provided as is. Is that correct? However, 2 flags seem to persist. The flag of the UK and France. Also, after looking at the results, the language selector diaolog box becomes really ugly. More and more, I think this package belongs in a third party repo because of the country flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061349.n16DnVE7022863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mefoster at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-02-06 08:49:26 EDT --- Here's my stab at a review ... Summary: there's a minor rpmlint issue with the SRPM and a need for more details about where the source comes from, and a more confusing issue regarding where the files should be installed. I'm also not sure whether to care that the gcc invocations don't use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and that make doesn't use %{?_smp_mflags}. Main packaging guidelines: [-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. % rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/java-gnome-4.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/java-gnome-* java-gnome.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: java-gnome-4.0.6-jnipath.patch A patch is included in your package but was not applied. Refer to the patches documentation to see what's wrong. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Give a script or a command sequence for getting the given BZR snapshot from the repository [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109207 [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Java-specific guidelines: [-] If the project name and the commonly used JAR filename differ, a symbolic link with the usual name must also be provided. If I understand this guideline correctly, the jar file generated by this package should be called java-gnome.jar, with gtk.jar as a symbolic link. [*] All JAR files MUST go into %{_javadir}. But see below ... [+] Java-specific BuildRequires/Requires look good [?] Since this package builds with OpenJDK, I'm not sure about the status of the GCJ guidelines. Probably not applicable ... [-] There are conflicting guidelines about JNI -- on the one hand, it says that "JAR files that require JNI shared objects MUST be installed in %{_libdir}/%{name}. The JNI shared objects themselves must also be installed in %{_libdir}/%{name}." On the other hand, there's language about using %{_jnidir}. So I think that the guidelines allow either of the following layouts: 1. Everything into %{_libdir}/java-gnome 2. Jars in %{_libdir}/java, shared objects in %{_libdir}/jni The current package has jars in %{_javadir} and shared objects in %{_libdir}/java, which doesn't meet either of these possibilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:55:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061355.n16DtPpu026130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #26 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 08:55:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > You can match this #bz with updates in Bodhi. I'm not quite sure I follow this one. Is this done when I run make update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 13:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 08:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061357.n16DvWOb026461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #22 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 08:57:31 EDT --- Ooop. I wrote to soon. All the flags are gone, replaced with question marks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061401.n16E1ZfF027547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 09:01:31 EDT --- Thanks for approving this. I have done an updated package which should fix everything you mentioned. I will proceed with the CVS request anyway. * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.4.4-1 - Update to Fedora native version 1.4.4: . Remove potentially patented ECC support. . Do not abort when the fips mode kernel flag is inaccessible due to permissions (#470219). - For review (Michel Alexandre Salim): . Remove *.def file. . Make description clearer. . Distribute the license files. - The license for binaries is GPLv2+, so update the license field. - Add check section (disabled by default). - Why did we set PATH before configure? Removed. - Added BR mingw32-dlfcn suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061405.n16E5nnk026939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #23 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 09:05:48 EDT --- So something is wrong - there should be no flags at all! Flags are replaced with language code label. Try to restart Plasma to load new package. It's usable even without flags, only it doesn't look so visually appealing. My SPEC should be final one but depends on resolution of issues with question flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] New: Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Summary: Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gtksourcecompletion.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gtksourcecompletion-0.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GtkSourceCompletion is a code completion library for GtkSourceView. (needed as a dependency for vtg, Vala Tools for gedit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061404.n16E44ps027946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 09:04:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libgcrypt Short Description: MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] New: Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Summary: Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/vtg.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/vtg-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Vala Toys for gEdit is an experimental collection of plugins that extends the gEdit editor to make it a better programmer editor for the Vala language. Vtg tries to make less compromises as possible so, for now, its scope is narrowed only to support Vala. It is written in Vala and it is currently composed of just one plugin with four modules: * Bracket completion module * Symbol completion module * Project Manager - based on the gnome build framework library * Project builder / executer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061411.n16EBFkW029681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061411.n16EBGml029706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:15:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061415.n16EFqHZ029383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #27 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 09:15:51 EDT --- In Bodhi you can set bugzilla id and then this review is updated with current state of update and automatically closed once it hit stable repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483628] Review Request: perl-Geo-IPfree - Look up country of IP Address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061414.n16EEUl6030261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483628 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-06 09:14:29 EDT --- Build ok: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7653 Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061422.n16EMk0S030934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry 2009-02-06 09:22:45 EDT --- Bump src to F11 Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xcall.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xcall-0.17-5.fc11.src.rpm - fix unowned directories - use original icon - libax25-devel required in BR does not auto assume - preserve original timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479976] Review Request: xwxapt - An application for decoding and saving weather images. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061424.n16EOJ5M032584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479976 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484363] New: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484363 Summary: Review Request: ggz-base-libs - Base libraries for GGZ gaming zone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/ggz-base-libs/ggz-base-libs.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/ggz-base-libs/ggz-base-libs-0.99.5-1.src.rpm Description: GGZ (which is a recursive acronym for GGZ Gaming Zone) develops libraries, games and game-related applications for client-server online gaming. Player rankings, game spectators, AI players and a chat bot are part of this effort. A new review required since upstream merged previous libggz, ggz-client-libs into a new ggz-base-libs module. * Fri Feb 06 2009 Rex Dieter 0.99.5-1 - ggz-base-libs-snapshot-0.99.5 - Obsoletes/Provides: libggz,ggz-client-libs Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109295 for dist-f10, dist-f11+ looks like it needs some additional libtool(2) love, yay. rpmlint output: (using my f8 rpmlint) ggz-base-libs.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/ggz-config ggz-base-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/ggz.menu ggz-base-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/ggz.merge.menu ggz-base-libs-devel.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.ggz 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These all are harmless here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480572] Review Request: xgridloc - An application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061438.n16Ec7Ua002422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480572 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xgridloc - |Review Request: xgridloc - |A GTK+ application for the |An application for the |calculation of Maidenhead |calculation of Maidenhead |QRA Locators |QRA Locators --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry 2009-02-06 09:38:05 EDT --- bump src to F11 Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/xgridloc.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/xgridloc-0.9-5.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 Randall J. Berry 'Dp67' - 0.9-5 - bump src to f11 - minor spec edits -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484374] New: Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 Summary: Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-uk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-uk-1.5.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ukrainian thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] New: Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 Summary: Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-ca-0.5.1-0.1.beta.fc10.src.rpm Description: Catalan thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] New: Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 Summary: Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-es.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-es-0.20090206-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Spanish thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061446.n16EkwaM005865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 09:46:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Note: SRPM URL no longer valid, and the Source0 field does not provide a URL; > I'm reviewing the slightly modified spec, using the newest gtk-vnc release. Right, so I've updated based on your patched spec file. > Documentation: the guideline specifies that man and info pages can be left out > if they duplicate the pages in the main Fedora package. But how about license > texts, README, ChangeLog, etc. -- the files that normally go under %doc ? What we have done in all the other MinGW packages is to include just the license file. The reasoning is roughly that the other files are contained in the native Fedora package, but the license file is in some sense "special" because we wouldn't want to distribute some code without the license. > ? library -> ldconfig (this is not needed for MinGW, I suppose?) That's correct. ldconfig does nothing for DLLs. > ? headers in -devel: presumably all mingw32- packages are meant for > cross-compiling, so this is irrelevant? Yes, everything is for development in MinGW. Here is the updated package: Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gtk-vnc/mingw32-gtk-vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.3.8-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.8-2 - Needs mingw32-filesystem with the pkg-config library path fix. - Added optional BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires. - Include the license file. * Tue Feb 3 2009 Michel Salim - 0.3.8-1 - Update to 0.3.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061455.n16EtVSd008254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 09:55:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-openssl Short Description: MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 14:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 09:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] New: Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Summary: Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: palango at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/aurulent/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/aurulent/hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts-20070504-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Aurulent Sans is a sans-serif font developed for use as the primary interface font on X Windows on GNU/Linux. It includes the latin alphabet, digits, and punctuation, as well as some accents. It is created by Stephen G. Hartke. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061500.n16F0Not008772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-02-06 10:00:21 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-atk.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-atk-1.25.2-5.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-atk pkgconfig rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem >= 46 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll) mingw32(libintl-8.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) $ rpmquery --provides mingw32-atk mingw32(libatk-1.0-0.dll) mingw32-atk = 1.25.2-4.fc11 $ rpmquery --fileprovide mingw32-atk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libatk-1.0-0.dll /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atk-enum-types.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atk.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkaction.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkcomponent.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkdocument.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkeditabletext.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkgobjectaccessible.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkhyperlink.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkhyperlinkimpl.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkhypertext.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkimage.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkmisc.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atknoopobject.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atknoopobjectfactory.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkobject.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkobjectfactory.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkregistry.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkrelation.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkrelationset.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkrelationtype.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkselection.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkstate.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkstateset.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkstreamablecontent.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atktable.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atktext.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkutil.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/atk-1.0/atk/atkvalue.h /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libatk-1.0.dll.a /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libatk-1.0.la /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/atk.pc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/am/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/be at latin/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/gu/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ku/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/li/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ml/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/mr/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ne/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/oc/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/or/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ps/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/rw/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/si/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sq/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr at ije/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr at latin/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/te/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tk/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/tt/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ug/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/wa/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/xh/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/yi/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/atk10.mo /usr/share/doc/mingw32-atk-1.25.2 /usr/share/doc/mingw32-atk-1.25.2/COPYING $ md5sum atk-1.25.2.tar.bz2 93a775ae90820abf04590aae293cc904 atk-1.25.2.tar.bz2 $ curl http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/atk/1.25/atk-1.25.2.tar.bz2 | md5sum % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 690k 100 690k 0 0 546k 0 0:00:01 0:00:01 --:--:-- 644k 93a775ae90820abf04590aae293cc904 - + OK - Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= xx is in the .spec file [+] Requires are OK [+] BuildArch: noarch [+] No man pages or info files [+] No static libs [+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific ones [+] No gtk-doc documentation [+] No .def files in the %files list [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [*] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [/] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [/] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [/] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [*] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Nothing to do anymore :) ================================================= The package mingw32-atk is APPROVED by epienbro ================================================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:06:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061506.n16F6Bng010472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:06:10 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061504.n16F4NtT009775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:04:22 EDT --- Okay. Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061506.n16F6nKD011347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:06:48 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061504.n16F4XLv010562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 10:04:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-atk Short Description: MinGW Windows Atk library Owners: rjones berrange Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061507.n16F7NC2011574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:07:22 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061515.n16FFtVC012954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484374] Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061515.n16FFMKW012849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061514.n16FEleg012918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061520.n16FK2E0013968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061521.n16FLgZL014305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-06 10:21:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-2.src.rpm I have filled a pair of bugs about library calling exit and the missing GPLv2 license. I'm using commands instead of macros now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061521.n16FLGYD014259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-06 10:21:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/raw-file/tip/gtk2/mingw32-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-gtk2-2.15.0-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Feb 6 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.15.0-3 - Remove documentation. - Add license file. - Added extra BRs suggested by auto-buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061519.n16FJj2Y013623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #50 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:19:40 EDT --- Any good news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061518.n16FIqpN013941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Bug 483438 depends on bug 482807, which changed state. Bug 482807 Summary: Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061521.n16FL9wY014580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:21:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061518.n16FIoDR013885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-06 10:18:49 EDT --- I have added the tag and build the package in F-10 and F-9. I will update libindi ASAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061523.n16FNGNS014649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 --- Comment #1 from John Guthrie 2009-02-06 10:23:14 EDT --- I mis-typed the two URLs above. They should be: Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/perl-Sendmail-PMilter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/perl-Sendmail-PMilter-0.96-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061523.n16FNMtB014705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dignan.patrick at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:23:20 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061522.n16FMn8H014585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(joseluisblancoc at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:22:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061528.n16FS3YA015856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mefoster at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mefoster at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-02-06 10:28:00 EDT --- (Using Jason Tibbitts' review template from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template) [-] source files match upstream: I followed the instructions in the spec file and ended up with something with a different md5sum than the file in the SRPM. The readme.txt and gpl.txt files do match though You could just use the upstream .zip file directly, though. Just change your %setup line to %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} and it'll create the directory when it needs to. [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [-] latest version is being packaged. It looks like upstream has released 0.12.5 [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [-] package builds in mock. error: %patch without corresponding "Patch:" tag You should have "%patch0", not "%patch", on line 62 For the remainder of this review I made this change [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [-] rpmlint is silent. One warning to deal with: simplyhtml.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 20) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Other warnings are about Group tags or confusion with the gcj noarch-ness [+] final provides and requires are sane: Provides: simplyhtml-0.12.3.jar.so simplyhtml = 0:0.12.3-2.fc10 simplyhtml(x86-32) = 0:0.12.3-2.fc10 Requires: /bin/sh gnu-regexp java java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31 javahelp2 jpackage-utils libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcj_bc.so.1 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libz.so.1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] gcj scriplets are correct [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. [-] Package doesn't run I recommend creating a small shell script to run the program with the correct CLASSPATH -- if you just try to run the jar file, it doesn't find the gnu-regexp classes. Something like this: #!/bin/sh exec java -cp `build-classpath gnu-regexp javahelp2 simplyhtml` \ com.lightdev.app.shtm.App [-] Other source files are included: Please check the status and the necessity of using the files in src/com/sun and de/calcom as they appear to come from other projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482807] Review Request: libfli - Library for FLI CCD Camera & Filter Wheels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061529.n16FTZ99016378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482807 --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 10:29:33 EDT --- Ok, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061532.n16FWnjE017361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 10:32:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec > SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-2.src.rpm > > I have filled a pair of bugs about library calling exit and the missing GPLv2 > license. I'm using commands instead of macros now. Source RPM does not exist - 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:33:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] New: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Summary: Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-2.12.18-1.src.rpm Summary: Gri is a language for scientific graphics programming. It is a command-driven application, as opposed to a click/point application. It is analogous to latex, and shares the property that extensive power is the reward for tolerating a modest learning curve. Gri output is in industry-standard PostScript, suitable for incorporation in documents prepared by various text processors. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109441 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint -iv ../RPMS/i386/gri-2.12.18-1.i386.rpm ../SRPMS/gri-2.12.18-1.src.rpm ./gri.spec gri.i386: I: checking gri.src: I: checking gri.src:39: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/gri $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. ./gri.spec:39: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT libdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/gri $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I think the warning about touching RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the build section is not a problem, as it is not being modified, just used to pass options to the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061547.n16FlDug020629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Patrick Dignan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dignan.patrick at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #14 from Patrick Dignan 2009-02-06 10:47:12 EDT --- Sorry, I've been very busy with school work and applying for internships. I also need to see what should be done about the config files. The default config file requires a number of programs, and uses absolute paths to them, so I'm going through and seeing which are common programs, and using sed to replace the paths with whatever %bindir (for example) is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:54:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061554.n16FsmOu021759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:54:45 EDT --- Okay, now this package itself is good. So: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061556.n16FucRg022924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-06 10:56:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libindi-0.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Upss! the dist tag was missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 15:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061559.n16FxIVx022853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-06 10:59:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created an attachment (id=331051) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331051) [details] > Adds a cloog-config.h file to the distribution Seems good. (In reply to comment #19) > > This library actually calls exit() in the library (e.g. > > source/names.c). This is unusual situation. Usually when some unexpected > > behavior happens in a function in a library, the function should > > return a value which tells the error or so and should call > > exit() ($ rpmlint -I shared-lib-calls-exit shows the explanation). > > > Would you contact upstream? > > Yes, sure. Though is this a blocker for the package to be sponsored ? Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061608.n16G8WxU025112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:08:28 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061609.n16G92nV025812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:09:01 EDT --- What is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061613.n16GDgFw026799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #28 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-06 11:13:41 EDT --- I dare to comment on this here as I cannot agree with Jaroslav -- I think that exactly this is the right place and moment to try explaining the things to someone who just submitted his first package(s): (In reply to comment #24) > Done. OK... I hope thats that... Wow.. Its a good thing to be able to > contribute. But just a thought really... shuoldn't this process be a lot > easier. I mean this should be go through a process to make sure you are who you > say you are, then submit the appropriate files to the web interface and thats > that. After about a year being a Fedora packager, I think now I understand _why_ the process is so convoluted and, moreover, why it must be so. > This process is way to convoluted. I feel like my head has been squeezed like a > pimple. Yes, I had similar feelings after submitting my first package, but you should distinct between two different areas of complexity: - Packaging Guidelines -- they are definitely not short and may be seen as too strict, but they are really necessary if we want to keep certain quality level of our packages (and, at least in my opinion, the quality of our packages is a strong point of Fedora compared to other distributions) - all the technicalities around -- the review process, all the review/cvs flags, Koji, Bodhi, cvs access etc. -- all these things are really not as hard as they might appear for the first time and you'll get used to them. Many of those things are great tools or serve for better communication, you'll (hopefully) see. Hence, last but not least: thanks for packaging:)! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483649] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Workers - Provides a simple sub-process management for asynchronous tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061618.n16GIco2027552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483649 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061629.n16GT7eu029835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:29:06 EDT --- Looking at the spec file should there not be a Requires: evince and gnome-python-desktop? I believe there needs to be a gnome-python2-evince and I've also filed a bug to have the evince libs split out into a sub package as I don't belive sugar-read needs any of the evice gui but rather just the libraries and python binaries. The bug is RHBZ 480729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061633.n16GXEpJ031010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-06 11:33:13 EDT --- gnome-python2-evince is in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061633.n16GXHvl031041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #29 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 11:33:16 EDT --- Milos: you're absolutely right, I agree with every word you've written! But this is review - place to help first time packager, place to review package but not to discuss if the process is good or not. I think correct place for it is devel mailing list. Thanks for help with review. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483657] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Policy-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Policy to name accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061646.n16GkEHC002015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483657 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061649.n16Gnvg0002420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-06 11:49:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-POE Short Description: Moose wrapper around a POE::Session Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483933] Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061649.n16Gn3gL002688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-06 11:49:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-autobox Short Description: Call methods on native types Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061659.n16GxRLA004541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-06 11:59:25 EDT --- Ok, thanks. It's OK for me now - as it's blocker for kde42, we can deal with these issues later once upstream fixes it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 16:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061656.n16GuxAN004614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #18 from Guenther Deschner 2009-02-06 11:56:56 EDT --- Sumit Bose and me, Guenther (samba co-maintainer) had a look at this again, and we couldn't find a recent srpm, just the one from August last year. Is there actually a more recent one somewhere ? So, we just took the existing one, updated it to the recent ctdb release and looked into all the discussed issues in this thread. A fixed and updated package can now be found here: http://sbose.fedorapeople.org/ctdb-1.0.71-2.fc10.src.rpm Both of us, Sumit and me, really want to get this into Fedora as soon as possible in order to get Samba use and link against it. How can we help to speed up this process ? I think Sumit would agree to become ctdb maintainer if necessary, and I can help reviewing it if still required. What are the next steps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 17:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061711.n16HBUMQ008444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #30 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 12:11:28 EDT --- Bodhi update done. Thanks to all for their help. Just a quck comment. I think that since most of the work is done on the server this should be a form / script based process where one complete step triggers the next. I'm sure that I will get used to the process, but really, a simple check mark on a form after a stage is complete should trigger the next stage etc. The whole process once approved takes hours waiting for thing to complete when a simple click on an OK button would do the job with the message processing and email will be sent when completed or check back later. I understand the reason for all the steps. But all the steps are known required steps. This shouldn't be so convoluted. I agree with Jaroslav and this really isn't the correct forum for a discussion. So I beg that somebody else gets the last word on this. Please so you guys don't think I'm trying to get the last word. Just wanted to write something cause it got stuck in my head. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 17:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061721.n16HLMgp010686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-06 12:21:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eina Short Description: A classic player for a modern era Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 17:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061743.n16Hhnjk013736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #19 from Abhijith Das 2009-02-06 12:43:47 EDT --- Guenther, Thanks for fixing the srpm. I was gonna update it myself shortly, but you beat me to it. I took a brief look at the spec file and I spotted a couple of things: a. You're missing changelog info between -58 and -71. I usually pull this stuff from the upstream srpm's spec file: http://ctdb.samba.org/packages/redhat/RHEL5/ctdb-1.0.71-1.src.rpm. It might also be worthwhile (if you've not already done so) to check for any changes upstream made to their spec file since -58 that we might've missed. b. I ran rpmlint -i on the ctdb.spec and: [adas at radium sbose]$ rpmlint -i ctdb.spec ctdb.spec:82: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. c. I also ran rpmlint -i on the binaries: ctdb.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.58-2 1.0.71-2.fc10 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ^^ This is the changelog stuff I mentioned above ctdb.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/ctdbd ctdb.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/smnotify ctdb.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ctdb_ipmux ctdb.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ctdb ctdb.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ctdb The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. ctdb-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ^^ I was told that this was ok, before... maybe spot can clarify. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. The next step is that we wait for spot to review, approve and sponsor, so this package gets into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 17:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484423] New: Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Summary: Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Netbook Launcher is a desktop launcher that uses the clutter UI library. It is commonly being used on netbook desktops with a resolution of 1024x600 pixels and also supposed to support usage on touchscreens. It follows the xdg spec standards from freedesktop.org for the Desktop menu layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061802.n16I25AV020119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-06 13:01:59 EDT --- *** Bug 451772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061804.n16I4mqA020519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-06 13:04:47 EDT --- F10 Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1109733 It currently does not build on Rawhide due to some Dwarf error: /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Offset (5317) greater than or equal to .debug_str size (4647). main.o: In function `main': /home/michel/rpmbuild/BUILD/netbook-launcher-1.2/src/main.c:118: undefined reference to `libgnomeui_module_info_get' /home/michel/rpmbuild/BUILD/netbook-launcher-1.2/src/main.c:118: undefined reference to `gnome_program_init' ... (the list goes on) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061802.n16I24H4020084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(jonathan.roberts. | |uk at googlemail.com) | --- Comment #20 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-06 13:01:59 EDT --- I've searched and there's no ongoing review for netbook-launcher, so I just created one. Could interested people move to that bug? Yaakov, Jonathan, are you interested in co-maintaining? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484423 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061822.n16IMc55024191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 --- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-06 13:22:37 EDT --- Fixed license. Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Time-Progress.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Time-Progress-1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484313] Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061828.n16ISMrA025109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-06 13:28:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Can Short Description: Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484320] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061834.n16IYq7k024828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484320 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-06 13:34:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball Short Description: Perl interface to Snowball stemmers Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484318] Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061833.n16IX88M024624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484318 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-06 13:33:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-DOMbo Short Description: Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061837.n16Ibiqb026929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061854.n16IsHsu030326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 --- Comment #2 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-06 13:54:17 EDT --- Added BR perl(Test::More). Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Lingua-StopWords.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Lingua-StopWords-0.09-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 18:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061856.n16Iufs1031038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 --- Comment #3 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-06 13:56:39 EDT --- Fixed the permissions. http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Class-Exporter.spec http://znark.com/fedora/perl-Class-Exporter-0.03-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 19:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061903.n16J3fp4031779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #9 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-06 14:03:40 EDT --- Anyone can help me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 19:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061916.n16JGwLf003171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #20 from Sumit Bose 2009-02-06 14:16:56 EDT --- Hi Abhi, I have uploaded a new version: http://sbose.fedorapeople.org/ctdb-1.0.71-3.fc10.src.rpm a. done b. I use %{_sourcedir} to include a license file, it can be removed from the spec file as soon as upstream will include it. c. done, I do not get the unstripped-binary-or-object here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 19:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:42:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902061942.n16Jgigp009146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #24 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-06 14:42:43 EDT --- OK... I gotcha. Restarted plasma and the icons completely disappered. Leaving only a list of Languages in the picker and how the program labels the country codes. Let the review begin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 20:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902062044.n16KiL0i022298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #3 from John Guthrie 2009-02-06 15:44:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (Using Jason Tibbitts' review template from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/Review_Template) > > [-] source files match upstream: > I followed the instructions in the spec file and ended up with > something with a different md5sum than the file in the SRPM. The > readme.txt and gpl.txt files do match though > > You could just use the upstream .zip file directly, though. Just change > your %setup line to > %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} > and it'll create the directory when it needs to. That would probably make my life noticeably easier. > [-] latest version is being packaged. > It looks like upstream has released 0.12.5 That's not too surprising since I first posted this review request 4.5 months ago. Let me download the new source and rebuild. > [-] Package doesn't run > I recommend creating a small shell script to run the program with the > correct CLASSPATH -- if you just try to run the jar file, it doesn't > find the gnu-regexp classes. > > Something like this: > > #!/bin/sh > > exec java -cp `build-classpath gnu-regexp javahelp2 simplyhtml` \ > com.lightdev.app.shtm.App When and where would I want to do this? During compile-time perhaps? (There are other blockers that I haven't addressed in this message. I was just picking a few blockers to deal with at first.) I will post a new SRPM and spec soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 21:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902062109.n16L9Rff027309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #5 from Pascal 2009-02-06 16:09:26 EDT --- I corrected the soname name New srpm: http://fedora.debroglie.net/SRPMS/10/libnewmat-10D-2.fc10.debroglie.src.rpm New spec: http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/libnewmat.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 21:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902062108.n16L8Ouu028842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #1 from Pascal 2009-02-06 16:08:23 EDT --- New srpm: http://fedora.debroglie.net/SRPMS/10/objcryst-fox-1.8.0-2.fc10.debroglie.src.rpm New spec: http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/objcryst-fox.spec I runned the spec through mock, fedora 9/10 and epel 5 both x86_64 are ok. I corrected some errors on the build require -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 21:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902062120.n16LKk4k031521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #17 from Anithra 2009-02-06 16:20:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) Thanks Andrew. I was able to resolve the NPE and key binding problems and have renamed the package to com.ibm.systemtapgui.* But adding a 1: epoch prefix for java-devel throws a dependency error when i try to build the package. I use java-gcj. Should i be moving to some other java?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 21:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902062131.n16LV3if000961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-06 16:31:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Thanks Andrew. I was able to resolve the NPE and key binding problems and have > renamed the package to com.ibm.systemtapgui.* Cool. > But adding a 1: epoch prefix for java-devel throws a dependency error when i > try to build the package. I use java-gcj. Should i be moving to some other > java?. java-1.5.0-gcj-compat-devel should Provide: java-devel = 1:1.5.0. Gah, it looks like it doesn't. Okay, remove the epoch and hopefully people using OpenJDK won't end up with gcj if they don't already have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 6 21:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902062133.n16LXTnC001233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-06 16:33:28 EDT --- Anithra: on the website there is a screenshot showing graphing. Is that functionality included here? Does it use Draw2D, GEF, BIRT, or something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 00:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070016.n170GcFa001193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 00:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480254] Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070011.n170BwfM001764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480254 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-06 19:11:56 EDT --- This is tiny and it might be useful, so I'll take a look. COPYING does indeed contain an MIT license, and many of the source files do as well, but a couple (strcasestr.c, strncasecmp.c) carry the BSD license. However, it doesn't seem as though those two source files are used when building on Linux, and so the resulting package I believe still has the MIT license as you have indicated, so that's OK. Honestly I don't see anything else to comment on. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 25600727a3fba9eb4e97762e0f675a2fb82e6eec454d74761525fd8c11fe8468 deletemail-0.5.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: deletemail = 0.5-1.fc11 deletemail(x86-64) = 0.5-1.fc11 = libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) libssl.so.8()(64bit) * I tested the package and it seems to work as advertised. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 00:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070024.n170OmgM002092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-06 19:24:45 EDT --- Any response to my review commentary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 00:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070029.n170TKeD002957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #16 from MERCIER 2009-02-06 19:29:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SPE Short Description: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released Owners: bioinfornatics at gmail.com Branches: F9 F10 InitialCC: bioinfornatics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 00:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] New: Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-farsight.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-farsight-0.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: telepathy-farsight is a Telepathy client that uses Farsight and GStreamer to handle media streaming channels. It's used as a background process by other Telepathy clients, rather than presenting any user interface of its own. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1110591 NOTE: This package is needed to build the latest version of Empathy in Rawhide, so a quick review would be most appreciated. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 00:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483676] Review Request: perl-App-Asciio - Draw ascii art quickly and easily! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070057.n170vTt4007220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483676 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-06 19:57:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 03:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070337.n173bmfd002102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 22:37:46 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 03:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070345.n173jW1U004725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 22:45:31 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1b08dbb71205a4a79df682c16903277c57451f9b Class-Exporter-0.03.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 03:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484374] Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070359.n173xSe6005997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 22:59:27 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 8c142046d675e371c4c1c7e8df4af83c1924a4b3 spell-uk-1.5.7.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English langu ages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested, koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 04:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070415.n174F8ba009173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 23:15:07 EDT --- Not that I do not trust you, but could you please explain why are you using "0.1.beta" as release tag? I see no mention of the project being in beta stage on its web site. Only: Historial del projecte * 31.oct.08. 0.5.0 - Primera versi? p?blica del diccionari feta manualment. Pendent de fer funcionar el sistema web. * 24.jul.08 - Inici del projecte Openthesaurus-ca Which makes indeed this version as being the second one, but yet, no mention of alpha/beta stage. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 57e4cabf8009099c2841a670df0a147d8e6cd037 thesaurus-ca.oxt [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested, koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** but I'd live to understand the reasoning behind the release tag ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 04:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070443.n174h3JO013804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 23:43:02 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of bundled source: b884671284be50f85e60a9f03ca87fa494deddc2 /bundled/OOo2-thes_es_ES.tar.bz2 SHA1SUM of file from Source0: e488abc85e63d77278e221e8b44ce893c0b47ca8 /upstream/OOo2-thes_es_ES.tar.bz2 => it looks like upstream repackages daily the content under the same name. [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-Englis h languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Testedon: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. I would approve it but I am not sure how to handle the difference between bundled and upstream sources. How about adding a line in the spec, specifying the reason ? I know that the date used in the release tag should be a hint, but I'd say that a more clear explanation is needed. What do you think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 05:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 00:56:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484483] New: Review Request: ldc - D Programming Language Compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ldc - D Programming Language Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484483 Summary: Review Request: ldc - D Programming Language Compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orlandoarias at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009020410 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.6 ldc is a D Programming Language Compiler. It is based on llvm (already in Fedora) and is licensed under a three-clause BSD license for the most part. LDC is released under the "three-clause BSD" license reproduced below with the following exceptions: The DMD frontend in dmd/* is originally written by Walter Bright and released under the artistic license (dmd/artistic.txt) or the GPL version 1 (dmd/gpl.txt). The files gen/asmstmt.cpp and gen/asm-*.h were originally written by David Friedman for GDC and released under the artistic license (dmd/artistic.txt) or the GPL version 2 or later. http://hg.dsource.org/projects/ldc/raw-file/tip/LICENSE I am under x86_64 and I haven't tried to build this yet, I expect success though. http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc If anything else is needed, let me know. Reproducible: Didn't try -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 06:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070608.n1768mnp028148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-07 01:08:47 EDT --- I'm not going to have a chance to look at this until I get back from FOSDEM, which means, sometime next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 07:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 02:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070736.n177a07b012635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-07 02:35:58 EDT --- Unfortunately your comment came after the start of the semester, so I've been a bit busy. Fortunately I have more time now, so I can finish this up. Things look good now that this is noarch. The only remaining issue I see is that you have Requires: python >= 2.3, python < 2.5 However, rpm will automaticaly insert a dependency on python(abi) = 2.4 Currently there's no guideline against this, but you might want to check out the following draft, which is working its way through the system: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires So I'll go ahead and approve this, but I would recommend that you kill that extra Requires: line. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 08:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 03:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] New: Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Summary: Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://camelus.fedorahosted.org OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Application classes for reviewtool. For the actual application, please install the 'reviewtool' package. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1110928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 08:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 03:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-Excel OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Excel.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Excel uses a different system for its dates than most Unix programs. This module allows you to convert between a few of the Excel raw formats and DateTime objects, which can then be further converted via any of the other DateTime::Format::* modules, or just with DateTime's methods.If you happen to be dealing with dates between 1 Jan 1900 and 1 Mar 1900 please read the notes on EPOCHS. If you're wanting to handle actual spreadsheet files, you may find the Spreadsheet::WriteExcel manpage and the Spreadsheet::ParseExcel manpage of use. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1110940 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 08:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 03:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484487] New: Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484487 Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Plugin-JavaScript OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Template::Plugin::JavaScript is a TT filter that filters text so it can be safely used in JavaScript quotes. e.g: [% USE JavaScript %] document.write("[% FILTER js %] Here's some text going on. [% END %]"); will become: document.write("\nHere\'s some text going on.\n"); Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1110951 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 09:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 04:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484483] Review Request: ldc - D Programming Language Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070911.n179BX11032156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484483 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-07 04:11:33 EDT --- Uhh, so you haven't made a RPM? You have to make one before someone can review it: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo Also, you need to get sponsored before you can get the package into Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join This looks more like a wishlist entry to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 09:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 04:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902070919.n179Jw0Y001271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-02-07 04:19:57 EDT --- The choice to start a service by default is left to the user, to do that he has to run 'chkconfig rabbitmq on' after installing the rpm. The rationale behind it is that after installation no unwanted services are started without the users knowledge, and him having the time to secure the ports with firewall rules etc. Since RabbitMQ listens on the network it shouldn't be started by default. Does that make sense? Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 10:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 05:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071054.n17AsdfB021799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #21 from Anithra 2009-02-07 05:54:38 EDT --- The above rpm , spec file contains all the other changes as well. Repeating the link: SPEC URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 10:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 05:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071052.n17Aq9lI021350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #20 from Anithra 2009-02-07 05:52:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Anithra: on the website there is a screenshot showing graphing. Is that > functionality included here? Does it use Draw2D, GEF, BIRT, or something else? graphing functionality is included, it uses eclipse-swt, not sure if that needs to be included in BuildRequires , added it anyway. SPEC URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 13:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071314.n17DEHp3020952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2009-02-07 08:14:16 EDT --- Martin, you should close this bug as CLOSED/NEXTRELEASE after importing and building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 13:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484483] Review Request: ldc - D Programming Language Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071329.n17DTBte024574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484483 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-07 08:29:10 EDT --- This is not a package review request but some twisted form of entry for a wishlist. Feel free to reopen if/when you can provide packages for review. Otherwise please pay a visit to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 13:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484487] Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071348.n17DmhWV029337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484487 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-07 08:48:42 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 97bd729f5deaee2b043c1fe2aff4067dae7dbb8c Template-Plugin-JavaScript-0.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 13:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484483] Review Request: ldc - D Programming Language Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071353.n17Dr7hP031033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484483 --- Comment #3 from Orlando Arias 2009-02-07 08:53:06 EDT --- Ugh, how embarrassing, should have read the wiki on this. I didn't want to make a tisted form of entry for a wish list. I managed to build it, but not the required method. I do not have the time to become a contributor right now since I won't be able to keep up with code maintenance. Feel free to delete this, guys. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 13:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 08:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071356.n17DuiCn031513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-07 08:56:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libindi Short Description: Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 14:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071459.n17ExIct013735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-07 09:59:18 EDT --- Version 1.1.2 SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify.spec SRPMS: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Commment: rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 15:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483696] Review Request: libdmapsharing - library for DAAP and DPAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071504.n17F4U3f014949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483696 --- Comment #1 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-07 10:04:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libdmapsharing.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/libdmapsharing-1.9.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: libdmapsharing implements the DMAP protocols. This includes support for DAAP and DPAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] New: Review Request: php-channel-ezc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-ezc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-ezc Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package adds the eZ Components channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-channel-ezc.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-channel-ezc-1-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-channel-ezc-1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint php-* php-channel-ezc.noarch: W: no-documentation php-channel-ezc.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(ezc) php-channel-ezc.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(%{channel}) php-channel-ezc.spec:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(ezc) php-channel-ezc.spec:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(%{channel}) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071635.n17GZuq2001114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |php-channel-ezc |php-channel-ezc - eZ | |Components -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071632.n17GWXsH031638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] New: Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 484507 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Base is a part of eZ Components : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 The Base package provides the basic infrastructure that all packages rely on. Therefore every component relies on this package. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base-1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base-1.6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint php-ezc-Base.* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | usr/share/pear/ezc/* | 5.0.2 | 1 | pcre | ...CTORY_SEPARATOR | | | | | spl | __FILE__ | | | | | | abstract | | | | | | catch | | | | | | final | | | | | | implements | | | | | | interface | | | | | | private | | | | | | protected | | | | | | public | | | | | | throw | | | | | | try | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071643.n17Gh2Df002290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #10 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-02-07 11:43:00 EDT --- Thanks Jason! RPM adds this implicit requires based on the BuildRequires I'm assuming? Makes sense and I'll remove the explicit Requires from the final version of the package. Thanks for your work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484511] New: Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Summary: Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/crunchyfrog/crunchyfrog.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/crunchyfrog/crunchyfrog-0.3.3-1.src.rpm Description: CrunchyFrog is a SQL client and database front-end. It's mainly written for GNOME but it should run in other environments too. Supported databases: * PostgreSQL (requires psycopg2) * MySQL (requires MySQLdb) * SQLite (requires python-sqlite3) * Oracle (requires cx_Oracle) * LDAP (requires python-ldap) * MSSQL (requires pymssql) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 16:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071653.n17Gr1Pa003052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-02-07 11:53:00 EDT --- For posterity's sake, here are the final spec and SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-uuid/python-uuid-1.30-3.el5.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-uuid Short Description: Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects Owners: rayvd Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 18:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071823.n17INCKU019874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Bug 480887 depends on bug 481071, which changed state. Bug 481071 Summary: Review Request: tex-musixtex - Sophisticated music typesetting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481071 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-07 13:23:10 EDT --- First of all: Would you explain why the license term in licenseMusicXML.html are related to this application? I fear that the clause --------------------------------------------------------------------- This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of California and the intellectual property laws of the United States of America. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- renders this license non-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 18:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071828.n17ISDtS018981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-07 13:28:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Would you explain why the license term in > licenseMusicXML.html are related to this application? s|why|how| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 19:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484487] Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071941.n17Jf6bb001434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484487 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-07 14:41:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript Short Description: Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 19:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484487] Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902071941.n17Jf76w000304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484487 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 21:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480254] Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072135.n17LZS6X020754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480254 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-07 16:35:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: deletemail Short Description: A non-interactive tool for deleting mails Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 21:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072143.n17LhExc020629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-07 16:43:13 EDT --- > you're missing somethint in changelog No. The first %changelog entry quoted in comment 4 is fine. > macronify more. No. The request in comment 5 leads to macro-madness. Only in some cases it is convenient to replace the program name with %{name} -- e.g. if you want to reuse a spec file for other packages. It doesn't happen often that a program changes its name frequently, so that using %name everywhere (even in URL and %files lists) would be justified. * The guidelines want the .desktop file to be validated in the %install section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage * The guidelines include specific shell code for scrollkeeper-update and desktop-data-base usage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Scrollkeeper https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database * Several directories are not included in %files: %dir %{_datadir}/gnome/help/diffuse %dir %{_datadir}/gnome/help/diffuse/C %dir %{_datadir}/omf/diffuse https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories * Rest is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072220.n17MKB2B028564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:20:10 EDT --- pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474768] Review Request: jpilot-backup - An enhanced backup plugin for J-Pilot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJFn4027977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474768 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:19:14 EDT --- jpilot-backup-0.53-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJvPD028163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:19:53 EDT --- backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJZlM028065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072220.n17MKEBt028602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072220.n17MK2W8028510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJVrU026701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:19:30 EDT --- mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072221.n17MLkHJ027734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:21:45 EDT --- kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2c-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-ihatethecashew'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1468 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJM6R028015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:19:21 EDT --- kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.2c-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kde-plasma-ihatethecashew'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072219.n17MJdqh026733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:19:38 EDT --- cgit-0.8.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update cgit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072216.n17MGoIF027767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-07 17:16:48 EDT --- * Source0 points to a web page. The following Source0 location actually points to a wget/curl-downloadable tarball: http://downloads.sf.net/qbittorrent/qbittorrent-1.3.0.tar.gz > ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} This --prefix is wrong. That's too much risk that the buildroot path finds its way into compiled/built files. Use --prefix=%{_prefix} only. > gmake %{?_smp_mflags} "gmake" is a softlink to "make", why not just use "make" from package "make" then? ;) > %doc README INSTALL NEWS COPYING AUTHORS TODO Changelog File "INSTALL" is irrelevant to the package users. * Run "rpmlint" on your src.rpm and built rpms and apply fixes as appropriate: $ rpmlint qbittorrent-1.3.0-4.fc10.src.rpm qbittorrent.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec qbittorrent.src:29: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} qbittorrent.src:29: W: configure-without-libdir-spec qbittorrent.src: E: description-line-too-long A Bittorrent client using C++ / rb_libtorrent and a Qt4 Graphical User Interface. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. * The Warning about missing --libdir usage can be ignored. * Testbuild will need Rawhide (F11 devel): Checking for libtorrent-rasterbar >= 0.14 ... no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072223.n17MNitn029974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:23:43 EDT --- gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480483] Review Request: gaupol - Subtitle editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072222.n17MMA93029458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480483 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:22:10 EDT --- gaupol-0.13.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072222.n17MMZXU029586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:22:34 EDT --- cgit-0.8.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cgit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072225.n17MPcsZ030606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:25:37 EDT --- posterazor-1.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update posterazor'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072224.n17MOgTo028393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:24:40 EDT --- backup-manager-0.7.7-7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479230] Review Request: pidgin-privacy-please - Stop spam bots for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072223.n17MN2Ok028213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479230 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:23:01 EDT --- pidgin-privacy-please-0.5.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483159] Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072224.n17MOqXI030109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483159 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:24:51 EDT --- sugar-xoirc-0-0.1.20090129.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-xoirc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 22:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072223.n17MNB9F029785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-07 17:23:10 EDT --- posterazor-1.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update posterazor'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 23:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 18:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072319.n17NJUwH007689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-07 18:19:29 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-stopwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-stopwatch-0-0.2.20090126.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 7 23:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 18:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902072318.n17NIoas007589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-07 18:18:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Please look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > ?for how to use version and release tags on pre-released software. ? ? For > example ? > Version: 1 > Release: 0.1.20090126git Thanks for the review. I left the 'git' away because I think that it doesn't matter which kind of VCS upstream is using. Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-clock.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-clock-0-0.2.20090207.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 00:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 19:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080059.n180x6sN023338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #13 from leigh scott 2009-02-07 19:59:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > * Source0 points to a web page. The following Source0 location actually points > to a wget/curl-downloadable tarball: > > http://downloads.sf.net/qbittorrent/qbittorrent-1.3.0.tar.gz > > > > ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} > > This --prefix is wrong. That's too much risk that the buildroot path finds its > way into compiled/built files. Use --prefix=%{_prefix} only. > > > > gmake %{?_smp_mflags} > > "gmake" is a softlink to "make", why not just use "make" from package "make" > then? ;) > > > > %doc README INSTALL NEWS COPYING AUTHORS TODO Changelog > > File "INSTALL" is irrelevant to the package users. > > > * Run "rpmlint" on your src.rpm and built rpms and apply fixes as appropriate: > > $ rpmlint qbittorrent-1.3.0-4.fc10.src.rpm > qbittorrent.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > qbittorrent.src:29: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./configure > --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} > qbittorrent.src:29: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > qbittorrent.src: E: description-line-too-long A Bittorrent client using C++ / > rb_libtorrent and a Qt4 Graphical User Interface. > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. > > * The Warning about missing --libdir usage can be ignored. > > > * Testbuild will need Rawhide (F11 devel): > Checking for libtorrent-rasterbar >= 0.14 ... no This isn't possible ! > > ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} > > This --prefix is wrong. That's too much risk that the buildroot path finds its > way into compiled/built files. Use --prefix=%{_prefix} only. I have read the packaging guidelines and found nothing that expressly prohibits this , so fixing this error isn't mandatory , is this correct ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 01:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080101.n1811M3U022224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #14 from leigh scott 2009-02-07 20:01:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > * Source0 points to a web page. The following Source0 location actually points > > to a wget/curl-downloadable tarball: > > > > http://downloads.sf.net/qbittorrent/qbittorrent-1.3.0.tar.gz > > > > > > > ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} > > > > This --prefix is wrong. That's too much risk that the buildroot path finds its > > way into compiled/built files. Use --prefix=%{_prefix} only. > > > > > > > gmake %{?_smp_mflags} > > > > "gmake" is a softlink to "make", why not just use "make" from package "make" > > then? ;) > > > > > > > %doc README INSTALL NEWS COPYING AUTHORS TODO Changelog > > > > File "INSTALL" is irrelevant to the package users. > > > > > > * Run "rpmlint" on your src.rpm and built rpms and apply fixes as appropriate: > > > > $ rpmlint qbittorrent-1.3.0-4.fc10.src.rpm > > qbittorrent.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > > qbittorrent.src:29: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./configure > > --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} > > qbittorrent.src:29: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > > qbittorrent.src: E: description-line-too-long A Bittorrent client using C++ / > > rb_libtorrent and a Qt4 Graphical User Interface. > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. > > > > * The Warning about missing --libdir usage can be ignored. > > > > > > * Testbuild will need Rawhide (F11 devel): > > Checking for libtorrent-rasterbar >= 0.14 ... no > > > This isn't possible ! > > > > ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} > > > > This --prefix is wrong. That's too much risk that the buildroot path finds its > > way into compiled/built files. Use --prefix=%{_prefix} only. > > > I have read the packaging guidelines and found nothing that expressly prohibits > this , so fixing this error isn't mandatory , is this correct ? I have also found this. http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-package-review at redhat.com/msg96285.html Fix if possible. nss.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 01:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:09:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080109.n1819wSS025212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #15 from leigh scott 2009-02-07 20:09:57 EDT --- Here are the new spec and srpm Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_2/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_2/qbittorrent-1.3.1-5.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint -vi qbittorrent-1.3.1-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm qbittorrent.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -vi qbittorrent-1.3.1-5.fc10.src.rpmqbittorrent.src: I: checking qbittorrent.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. qbittorrent.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. qbittorrent.src:30: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 01:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080112.n181CfZS025908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #16 from leigh scott 2009-02-07 20:12:39 EDT --- > I have also found this. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-package-review at redhat.com/msg96285.html > > Fix if possible. > > nss.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the > beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" Disregard this, I miss read it :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 01:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080117.n181H4oi026704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-07 20:17:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > First of all: > > Would you explain why the license term in > licenseMusicXML.html are related to this application? > > I fear that the clause > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This > Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of California and the > intellectual property laws of the United States of America. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > renders this license non-free. I am not sure if we should include this license file in the package. As far as I understood this license applies to certain MusicXML document files. No such files are distributed by upstream tarball. The only relation between this license and kguitar is: kguitar is capable of handling MusicXML files. In Fedora, we have also other applications that can handle these MusicXML files. Tuxguitar and hydrogen are two examples that I can think of (they both do not distribute MusicXML document files.). Should I take this file off the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 01:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 20:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080119.n181J7Dp024972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-07 20:19:06 EDT --- Just to clear confusion, in the above message "MusicXML document files" and "MusicXML files" mean the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 02:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 21:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.3.20090207svn.fc10.src.rpm Description: Plasmoid for KDE4 to control Network Manger. It still has some issues, but we (the KDE SIG) are looking to get it into Rawhide so it can get testing before the F11 beta and so we can evaluate it as a possible default for F11 if it matures in time, otherwise, we plan to at least offer it as an option. We also plan to push it out to F10 and possibly F9 once it is reliable enough for a non-default option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 03:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 22:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080313.n183Dh3h009934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-07 22:13:42 EDT --- New upstream release. I removed the patches that are no longer necessary. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse-1.0-0.1.rc1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 05:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 00:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080502.n1852rV8028675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #4 from John Guthrie 2009-02-08 00:02:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > [-] Package doesn't run > > I recommend creating a small shell script to run the program with the > > correct CLASSPATH -- if you just try to run the jar file, it doesn't > > find the gnu-regexp classes. > > > > Something like this: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > exec java -cp `build-classpath gnu-regexp javahelp2 simplyhtml` \ > > com.lightdev.app.shtm.App > > When and where would I want to do this? During compile-time perhaps? Never mind this comment. I was totally mis-parsing what you were trying to say. I figured it out. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 06:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080620.n186KTZV008458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-08 01:20:27 EDT --- All remaining issues have been fixed -- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 06:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 01:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080656.n186uoMR012193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #8 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-08 01:56:48 EDT --- There are serious problems with the Requires. Although vhybridize is found at build-time as you have: BuildRequires: vhybridize this is not sufficient as the autodeps searcher in RPM does not search the resulting package and automatically add the dependent packages (unlike for Perl) and all dependent Python packages must be added *explicitly* in the .spec file, otherwise it fails on install: $ pipviewer Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pipviewer", line 5, in from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2562, in working_set.require(__requires__) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, in require needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements)) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 524, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) # XXX put more info here pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: vhybridize>=0.5.9 Ditto for PyQt pygtk2 PyOpenGL, and you need the runtime versions of these (add any minimum version Requires as well): Requires: PyQt, pygtk, PyOpenGL >= 2.0, vhybridize >= 0.5.9 Also it seems that PyOpenGL isn't sufficient to get this to work, as I have this installed $ rpm -q PyOpenGL PyOpenGL-3.0.0-0.9.b8.fc10.noarch but it still fails at runtime. $ pipviewer Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pipviewer", line 5, in from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2562, in working_set.require(__requires__) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, in require needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements)) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 524, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) # XXX put more info here pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: OpenGL>=2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 07:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 02:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080706.n1876XRq013938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #9 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-08 02:06:32 EDT --- The last OpenGL problem appears to be a problem with the information in the egg file: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pipviewer-0.3.9-py2.5.egg-info/requires.txt it contains OpenGL>=2.0 vhybridize>=0.5.9 but the package is called PyOpenGL not OpenGL, if you change OpenGL -> PyOpenGL it starts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 07:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 02:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080711.n187BN8F016640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #11 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-08 02:11:22 EDT --- Also the summary has multiple typos: Pipviewer is a visualizer for multiple alignements ^^^ alignments of genomic sequences. It highlights conserved regions and allows basic anotations. ^^^ annotations Its main goal is to find conserved probes for the construction of gene order data sets. Selected regions marked as 'probes' can be expoxted to fasta format. It can also retreive ^^^ retrieve gene annotations form ^^^ from the NBCI and display this information along the alignement. ^^^ alignment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 07:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 02:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080707.n1877cub014021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #10 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-08 02:07:37 EDT --- Note to reviewer: you should ensure you test the package at run-time on at least one release before approving a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 07:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 02:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080734.n187Yiek017913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #5 from John Guthrie 2009-02-08 02:34:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I have posted a new spec file and SRPM. Here are the URLs: Spec: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/simplyhtml.spec SRPM: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/simplyhtml-0.12.5-2.fc10.src.rpm > [-] source files match upstream: > I followed the instructions in the spec file and ended up with > something with a different md5sum than the file in the SRPM. The > readme.txt and gpl.txt files do match though > > You could just use the upstream .zip file directly, though. Just change > your %setup line to > %setup -q -c %{name}-%{version} > and it'll create the directory when it needs to. For the 0.12.5 version, the upstream is now offering the source in .tar.gz format. I am now using that unmodified. > [-] latest version is being packaged. > It looks like upstream has released 0.12.5 This is fixed. 0.12.5 is now packaged. > [-] package builds in mock. > error: %patch without corresponding "Patch:" tag > You should have "%patch0", not "%patch", on line 62 > For the remainder of this review I made this change This is fixed. > [-] rpmlint is silent. > One warning to deal with: > simplyhtml.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line > 20) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a > cosmetic > annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. This is fixed. > [-] Package doesn't run > I recommend creating a small shell script to run the program with the > correct CLASSPATH -- if you just try to run the jar file, it doesn't > find the gnu-regexp classes. > > Something like this: > > #!/bin/sh > > exec java -cp `build-classpath gnu-regexp javahelp2 simplyhtml` \ > com.lightdev.app.shtm.App I did this almost verbatim except that I added simplyhtml-help to the build-classpath command. > [-] Other source files are included: > Please check the status and the necessity of using the files in > src/com/sun and de/calcom as they appear to come from other projects. The short story is that from what I can tell, these files actually are imported into the files for this project. I will talk more about this later when it is not 2AM and I am needing sleep. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 08:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 03:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080846.n188kSFf030887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484548 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 08:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 03:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484548] Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080846.n188kS6R030867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484548 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484547 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 08:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 03:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484548] New: Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484548 Summary: Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/facebook-notify/0-0.1.20090208git4552e7c/facebook-notify.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/facebook-notify/0-0.1.20090208git4552e7c/facebook-notify-0-0.1.20090208git4552e7c.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a small application which monitors your Facebook profile and notifies you when it changes. It notifies you when any of the following events occur: * One of your friends changes their status, profile picture, or profile details * You receive a friend request, event or group invitation * Someone writes on one of your friends walls * One of your friends is tagged in a photo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 08:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 03:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484547] New: Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 Summary: Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/pyfacebook/0.1-1.20090208svn173/pyfacebook.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/pyfacebook/0.1-1.20090208svn173/pyfacebook-0.1-1.20090208svn173.fc10.src.rpm Description: PyFacebook is a thin wrapper for accessing Facebook's RESTful API through Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 09:06:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 04:06:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902080906.n1896TjN000612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-08 04:06:28 EDT --- Some comments: MUSTFIX: * AutoReqProv: no This disables rpm's automatic dependency tracking and therefore is strongly frowned upon. * Epoch: 1 Setting epoch to != 0 for a package to be included into Fedora is hardly useful. SHOULD: * Building on x86_64 emits serious warning, e.g. this memory.h: In member function 'void* Pool::alloc(size_t)': memory.h:55: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' memory.h: In member function 'void Pool::free(void*, size_t)': memory.h:73: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'size_t' In many cases, this kind of warnings are the origin of mal-functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 10:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476622] Review Request: ocaml-pa-do - OCaml syntax extension for delimited overloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081000.n18A0vH7012343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476622 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-08 05:00:56 EDT --- Another new upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-do-0.8.3-2.fc11.src.rpm * Sun Feb 8 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.8.3-2 - New upstream version 0.8.3. - Missing BR pdflatex. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1112817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 11:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:09:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] New: Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 Summary: Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://bashdb.sourceforge.net/pydb OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/pydb.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/pydb-1.25-3.fc10.src.rpm Extended Python Debugger is a more complete debugger for Python than the stock pdb.py debugger. It supports a "restart" command, non-interactive POSIX-like line tracing, command options, disassembly of instructions, and stack traces that give better information for exec statements. Stepping/nexting skips over method/function "defs". It tries to follow gdb's command set unless there is good reason not to. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: pydb integrates with ddd, providing a graphical environment for python debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 11:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081117.n18BHXvO029430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-08 06:17:32 EDT --- Just a few comments: - License is GPLv2+, not GPLv2. - Remove Requires: readline, this is automatically picked up. - Remove pushd and popd from setup, you don't need them. - Change make command to make %{?_smp_mflags} as this works fine. The paths are already set by %configure. - Replace "rm -Rf" with "rm -rf" to be consistent. - Absolute paths in %files need to be replaced with %{_bindir}, %{_datadir} and so on. - Changelog is way too long, IMHO you may remove everything that is before 2006. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 11:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081120.n18BKJfw028111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-08 06:20:18 EDT --- Also, since the package includes Emacs files, you need to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs You'll have to branch the emacs script in its own subpackage, as gri probably works without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 11:47:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081147.n18Blucq001153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 11:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081147.n18BlvU3001175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 11:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 06:47:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] New: Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 484507,484509 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora ConsoleTools is a part of eZ Components : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 A set of classes to do different actions with the console (also called shell). It can render a progress bar, tables and a status bar and contains a class for parsing command line options. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-ConsoleTools.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-ConsoleTools-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-ConsoleTools-1.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint php-ezc-Base.* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | pear/* | 5.0.0 | 0 | pcre | PHP_EOL | | | | | | STDIN | | | | | | abstract | | | | | | catch | | | | | | implements | | | | | | instanceof | | | | | | interface | | | | | | private | | | | | | protected | | | | | | public | | | | | | throw | | | | | | try | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 12:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081237.n18CbMGw013718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-08 07:37:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331236) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331236) patch for spec file > I have read the packaging guidelines and found nothing that > expressly prohibits this , so fixing this error isn't mandatory , > is this correct ? No. For this review a fix will be mandatory. I'm going to test-build with attached patch, as I believe it to be the correct way to package this app. The buildroot path being used in %build (instead of just %install) usually is a packaging mistake/pitfall. It has lead to trouble several times before. The guidelines aren't as complete as necessary to cover each and every packaging detail. In corner-cases it may be "okay" to use the buildroot path in %build. But then you should have a much better rationale than a spec file comment such as "needs the RPM_BUILD_ROOT in prefix to build". That's too vague and unconvincing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 13:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081303.n18D3jc7017438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484567 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 13:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081303.n18D3iF6017416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484567 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 13:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484567] New: Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 484507,484509 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Base is a part of eZ Components : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Provides support for file operations which are not covered by PHP or are just missing. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-File.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-File-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-File-1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint php-ezc-Base.* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | pear/* | 4.0.0 | 0 | | | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 13:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081314.n18DE7vN021564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #18 from leigh scott 2009-02-08 08:14:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created an attachment (id=331236) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331236) [details] > patch for spec file > > > I have read the packaging guidelines and found nothing that > > expressly prohibits this , so fixing this error isn't mandatory , > > is this correct ? > > No. For this review a fix will be mandatory. I'm going to test-build with > attached patch, as I believe it to be the correct way to package this app. > > The buildroot path being used in %build (instead of just %install) usually is a > packaging mistake/pitfall. It has lead to trouble several times before. > > The guidelines aren't as complete as necessary to cover each and every > packaging detail. In corner-cases it may be "okay" to use the buildroot path in > %build. But then you should have a much better rationale than a spec file > comment such as "needs the RPM_BUILD_ROOT in prefix to build". That's too vague > and unconvincing. Thank you for the patch it works fine, I didn't know about the INSTALL_ROOT option. Here are the new SRPM & Spec file with your changes from you patch Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_3/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_3/qbittorrent-1.3.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Thank you for your help. Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 13:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081317.n18DHvXR020876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #19 from leigh scott 2009-02-08 08:17:56 EDT --- Heres the output for rpmlint srpm qbittorrent.src: I: checking qbittorrent.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. qbittorrent.src:29: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. built package qbittorrent.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 16:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081605.n18G5L9H026620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 --- Comment #12 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-02-08 11:05:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-uuid Short Description: Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects Owners: rayvd Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 16:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081633.n18GXU0T030111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-08 11:33:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Some comments: > > MUSTFIX: > * AutoReqProv: no > This disables rpm's automatic dependency tracking and therefore is strongly > frowned upon. > > * Epoch: 1 > Setting epoch to != 0 for a package to be included into Fedora is hardly > useful. > As I wrote above about Epoch and as a comment in the SPEC file about AutoReqProv, there are valid reasons for using both. > SHOULD: > * Building on x86_64 emits serious warning, e.g. this > > memory.h: In member function 'void* Pool::alloc(size_t)': > memory.h:55: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type > 'size_t' > memory.h: In member function 'void Pool::free(void*, size_t)': > memory.h:73: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type > 'size_t' > > In many cases, this kind of warnings are the origin of mal-functions. I use the software. I didn't encounter any problems (yet). But I'll see what we can do. Finally, I made a request to you at RPMFusion. I am re-iterating it: Please, pretty please, do not write in my bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 16:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081645.n18GjmSV000384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-08 11:45:46 EDT --- Ah, after reading http://musicxml.org/xml.html and also this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357461 and also your explanation: - This MusicXML document format license is free, GPL imcompatible - However it seems that kguitar behaves just an interpreter or editor for MusicXML document format license files. So there should no license issue for this package. Then: * _texmf macro - Isn't the following enough? ------------------------------------------------------------- %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN')} ------------------------------------------------------------- ! Versioning - For svn based tarball, I prefer to include revision number rather than the date I pulled the source because revision number specifies the source used precisely, however this is left to your choice. - By the way, would you tell me if this is after or before 0.5.1 formal release? * TeX dependency - I think 30 Mbyte extra dependency is enough large. Also I think that requiring another font for this package should not be mandatory. TeX related dependency should be split out. I would choose "kguitar-tex" for TeX related subpackage. * Timestamps ------------------------------------------------------------- touch -r %{name}/x-%{name}.desktop tmpfile ------------------------------------------------------------- - Is it really needed here to keep timestamps on this file? You "actually" modified this desktop file here. ? Desktop file location - Is it needed that the desktop file is installed under %_datadir/applications/kde, not under %_datadir/applications? Such desktop files cannot be seem from GNOME, however it seems that this application can be used also on GNOME. * _docdir - Files/directories under %_docdir are automatically marked as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 17:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081704.n18H4TWS004352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-08 12:04:28 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 17:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081735.n18HZRpE012641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-08 12:35:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Finally, I made a request to you at RPMFusion. I am re-iterating it: Please, > pretty please, do not write in my bugs. OK, I am closing this PR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 18:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484548] Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081815.n18IFCZS020801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484548 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-02-08 13:15:11 EDT --- I would say that this application is not ready for mainstream... closing, will reopen when upstream is more developed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 18:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081813.n18ID6Wt019110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #22 from Sumit Bose 2009-02-08 13:13:03 EDT --- Ronnie Sahlberg added a COPYING file upstream. I have include the patch and uploaded the latest version to: http://sbose.fedorapeople.org/ctdb-1.0.71-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 18:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081823.n18INsso020970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-08 13:23:53 EDT --- I would to like to see a separate package for pymacs. I dislike to drop the ide support for emacs, because emacs is a wide spreaded editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 18:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479832] Review Request: mmpong - a massively multiplayer pong game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081845.n18IjCP6026638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479832 Kai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(maintainer at mt2009 | |.com) | --- Comment #10 from Kai 2009-02-08 13:45:10 EDT --- Uh, I'm sorry! I was away for a couple of weeks. I'll get back to it when I find the time. Thanks for hanging on ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 19:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902081937.n18Jbb4Z004434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-08 14:37:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Ah, after reading http://musicxml.org/xml.html and > also this: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357461 > and also your explanation: > > - This MusicXML document format license is free, GPL imcompatible > - However it seems that kguitar behaves just an interpreter or > editor for MusicXML document format license files. > > So there should no license issue for this package. Then: > Ok, so should I keep that MusicXML document license file in the %doc, or doesn't it matter? > * _texmf macro > - Isn't the following enough? > ------------------------------------------------------------- > %{!?_texmf: %define _texmf %(kpsewhich -expand-var '$TEXMFMAIN')} > ------------------------------------------------------------- > I forgot to fix this. There's already an RPM macro %{_texmf_main} provided by texlive-texmf package. I made the SPEC file to use that macro instead. > ! Versioning > - For svn based tarball, I prefer to include revision number > rather than the date I pulled the source because revision > number specifies the source used precisely, however > this is left to your choice. > I agree. Changed. > - By the way, would you tell me if this is after or before > 0.5.1 formal release? > This SVN snapshot includes some fixes that came *after* the 0.5.1 formal release. > * TeX dependency > - I think 30 Mbyte extra dependency is enough large. > Also I think that requiring another font for this package > should not be mandatory. > TeX related dependency should be split out. > I would choose "kguitar-tex" for TeX related subpackage. > I split the TeX bits into a subpackage. > * Timestamps > ------------------------------------------------------------- > touch -r %{name}/x-%{name}.desktop tmpfile > ------------------------------------------------------------- > - Is it really needed here to keep timestamps on this file? > You "actually" modified this desktop file here. > I was not thinking. Removed the timestamp conservation. > ? Desktop file location > - Is it needed that the desktop file is installed under > %_datadir/applications/kde, not under %_datadir/applications? > Such desktop files cannot be seem from GNOME, however > it seems that this application can be used also on GNOME. > I didn't know that the application won't be visible from gnome. I changed it to use %_datadir/applications. > * _docdir > - Files/directories under %_docdir are automatically marked > as %doc Removed the unnecessary %doc. Update: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kguitar-0.5.1-3.926svn.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.5.1-3.926svn - Change the EVR scheme (use svn revision instead of date in R) - Use RPM's _texmf_main macro instead of redefining it - Place the TeX bit into a -tex subpackage - Specfile cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082004.n18K4kBa010562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-08 15:04:45 EDT --- I put so much time into this package. I am still actively working on it and I am in contact with upstream and helping them fixing things out. There are people waiting for this package. Who the piteous are you to close my bug?? This is vile, disrespectful, inconsiderate and ignorant. One more time: PLEASE DO NOT POST IN MY BUGS! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082011.n18KBGqh012137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-08 15:11:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I put so much time into this package. I am still actively working on it and I > am in contact with upstream and helping them fixing things out. There are > people waiting for this package. I rejected your package because you made it clear you are either unwilling or unable to make it compliant to the Fedora packaging standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082019.n18KJpnA013471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-08 15:19:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Exporter Short Description: Export class methods as regular subroutines Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] New: Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Summary: Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MusE is a MIDI/Audio sequencer with recording and editing capabilities. It can perform audio effects like chorus/flanger in realtime via LASH and it supports Jack and ALSA interfaces. MusE aims to be a complete multitrack virtual studio for Linux. rpmlint is silent. Epoch: 1 is there for PlanetCCRMA compatibility. See AudioCreation SIG wiki for informations about PlanetCCRMA integration: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AudioCreation NOTE: This Review Request have been opened before (bug #483301) but someone with personality issues have closed that bug. Let us hope he doesn't taint this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082018.n18KIcjs012749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-08 15:18:37 EDT --- PLEASE DO NOT POST IN MY BUGS !!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082019.n18KJ4BM012814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-08 15:19:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Time-Progress Short Description: Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082024.n18KOQrA014485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #25 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-08 15:24:25 EDT --- Jaroslav... OK... I gotta ask a maybe dumb question. I can wait if it is required. I'm only asking because of the frequency of activity and what seems to be a slow down in it. Since you submitted the last set of changes; does that mean that somebody else should conduct the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082023.n18KNjrj014380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-08 15:23:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Stop trolling. #include int main() { size_t x = 0x100000000; printf( "%d\n", x); printf( "%zd\n", x); } (In reply to comment #7) > > memory.h:73: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 2 has type > > 'size_t' > > > > In many cases, this kind of warnings are the origin of mal-functions. > > I use the software. I didn't encounter any problems (yet). But I'll see > what we can do. Let me demonstrate the seriousness of this bug: Compile this code on x86_64: #include int main() { size_t x = 0x100000000; printf( "%d\n", x); printf( "%zd\n", x); } # gcc -Wall -O2 -o foo foo.c foo.c: In function ?main?: foo.c:7: warning: format ?%d? expects type ?int?, but argument 2 has type Then run it: ./foo 0 4294967296 => Mal-function -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082030.n18KU4Nv015949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-08 15:30:03 EDT --- PLEASE DO NOT POST IN MY BUGS !!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:33:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082033.n18KXoma016642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 20:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] New: Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Summary: Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-argparse/python-argparse.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-argparse/python-argparse-0.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1113741 Description: The argparse module is an optparse-inspired command line parser that improves on optparse by: * handling both optional and positional arguments * supporting parsers that dispatch to sub-parsers * producing more informative usage messages * supporting actions that consume any number of command-line args * allowing types and actions to be specified with simple callables instead of hacking class attributes like STORE_ACTIONS or CHECK_METHODS as well as including a number of other more minor improvements on the optparse API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082114.n18LEkel023546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082114.n18LElqR023568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] New: Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Summary: Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/grin/grin.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/grin/grin-1.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1113774 Description: grin is a similar in function to GNU grep, however it's has modified behaviour to make it simpler to use when grepping source code. Some features grin feature are: * recurse directories by default * do not go into directories with specified names * do not search files with specified extensions * be able to show context lines before and after matched lines * Python regex syntax * unless suppressed via a command line option, display the filename regardless of the number of files * accept a file (or stdin) with a list of newline-separated filenames * grep through gzipped text files * be useful as a library to build custom tools quickly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082121.n18LLvDq025943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Armin 2009-02-08 16:21:56 EDT --- there is an rpmlint issue with the src rpm: kde-plasma-networkmanagement.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kde-plasma-networkmanager 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. it's better if you specify the highest version of kde-plasma-networkmanager it obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082123.n18LN8Jp025385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #2 from Armin 2009-02-08 16:23:08 EDT --- there is an rpmlint issue with the src rpm: kde-plasma-networkmanagement.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kde-plasma-networkmanager 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. it's better if you specify the highest version of kde-plasma-networkmanager it obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082132.n18LWPw2030122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #3 from Armin 2009-02-08 16:32:24 EDT --- kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: no-documentation kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/NetworkManager-kde4.conf kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided kde-plasma-networkmanager 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. There is no %doc (the TODO and DESIGN files could be added as %doc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082141.n18LfDFq029094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:41:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082138.n18LcTTH028354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #4 from Armin 2009-02-08 16:38:27 EDT --- also, for debug-info, it's better if you chop the %description in two lines, rpmlint complains about this: kde-plasma-networkmanagement-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package kde-plasma-networkmanagement. kde-plasma-networkmanagement-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kde-plasma-networkmanagement-debuginfo-0.1-0.3.20090207svn.fc10.x86_64.rpm and the filename is too long for all of them, but I don't think that would be a big issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082142.n18LggIj032113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #5 from Armin 2009-02-08 16:42:41 EDT --- otherwise, it builds fine on x86_64 =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082143.n18Lh3Rc029353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:43:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483933] Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082149.n18Ln9a9000572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:49:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483857] Review Request: Eina - A classic player for a modern era In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082148.n18LmKeZ030190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483857 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:48:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:50:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082150.n18Lon2J030875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:50:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082149.n18LnQVV030313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-08 16:49:25 EDT --- > kde-plasma-networkmanagement.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kde-plasma-networkmanager That one ought to be fixed. > kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: no-documentation Mostly harmless. Is there no COPYING? That's worth a complaint upstream. TODO and DESIGN may or may not be worth shipping. > kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/NetworkManager-kde4.conf That's the usual D-Bus "config files" which aren't really "config files". It could be marked %config, but I think it probably shouldn't, that file isn't really intended to be customized. The path is in /etc because that's where D-Bus expects those files to be. > kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided kde-plasma-networkmanager Harmless, but I think adding the Provides can't hurt and it will make "yum install kde-plasma-networkmanager" work. > kde-plasma-networkmanagement-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package kde-plasma-networkmanagement. The line exceeds 80 characters, it should be broken into 2 lines. > kde-plasma-networkmanagement-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kde-plasma-networkmanagement-debuginfo-0.1-0.3.20090207svn.fc10.x86_64.rpm Ignore that one. The name is as it has to be according to the guidelines, you can't shorten it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082153.n18LrnPx001745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:53:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082156.n18LuHfi002436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #7 from Armin 2009-02-08 16:56:16 EDT --- > Mostly harmless. Is there no COPYING? That's worth a complaint upstream. TODO > and DESIGN may or may not be worth shipping. no, there isn't. But I think TODO and DESIGN should be part of %doc, as they are upstream. Someone might need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082152.n18Lq9Gk001566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:52:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082155.n18LtnKR031854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 Tobias Mueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-bugs at cryptobitch.de --- Comment #6 from Tobias Mueller 2009-02-08 16:55:47 EDT --- Matthias: Do you have any official response from the cacert support mailinglist yet? I'd love to see the cacert certs shipped with fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484320] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082155.n18LtDuw031654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484320 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:55:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480254] Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082201.n18M1Lo1003587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480254 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:01:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 21:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082158.n18LwED6032161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 16:58:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082200.n18M08jl032697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:00:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484487] Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082205.n18M5ffG004524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484487 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:05:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484318] Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082210.n18MAGtt005494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484318 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:10:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484313] Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082211.n18MBIcu002704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:11:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082209.n18M9IeX001980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:09:17 EDT --- Please use FAS name in the owners field. Should this package be 'SPE' or 'spe'? Case matters, and your package name so far as been 'spe'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082214.n18MEG1w006055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:14:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:12:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082212.n18MCEpB005869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:12:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 22:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082213.n18MD9D5002942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-08 17:13:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 8 23:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902082306.n18N6j4x016497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-08 18:06:43 EDT --- Actually the -debuginfo description is autogenerated, so that description-line-too-long warning can also be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 01:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090104.n1914Mb3005039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-08 20:04:20 EDT --- - regarding the rpmlint output, as discussed in previous comments -- please fix: kde-plasma-networkmanagement.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided kde-plasma-networkmanagement.x86_64: W: no-documentation (include the TODO and DESIGN file) - use macros in %build and %files: %{cmake_kde4} .. -DDBUS_SYSTEM_POLICY_DIR=/etc/dbus-1/system.d /etc/dbus-1/system.d/NetworkManager-kde4.conf /etc => %{_sysconfdir} - remove unnecessary BR (main package) and R (for -devel subpackage): BR/R: NetworkManager-devel which is required by NetworkManager-glib-devel BR/R: kdelibs4-devel which is required by kdebase-workspace-devel Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig xdg-utils Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig xdg-utils (Those are taken by rpm automagically) - please provide a more appropriate description than %{summary} for the main package. - please provide a less general URL than just kde.org, e.g. http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/base/plasma/applets/networkmanager/ - there is no licensing info besides the qt dual license and .desktop files; nor in an attached LICENSE file, nor in the source files -- that's bad. Please ask upstream to include a license file and to mention the license in the sources. You should also include a LICENSE.GPL and GPL_EXCEPTION.txt file as the qt license states. - please fix the gcc flags, something like this before the make call should be enough: find . -name "flags.make" -execdir sed -i -e 's/-fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common//' -e 's/-fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden//' -e 's/-ansi//' {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 01:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090126.n191QCK6005698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 --- Comment #18 from MERCIER 2009-02-08 20:26:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spe Short Description: spe it is a Python IDE editor released Owners: bioinfornatics at gmail.com Branches: F9 F10 InitialCC: bioinfornatics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 01:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090141.n191frM2011176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #10 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-08 20:41:52 EDT --- ad *-debuginfo.*: E: description-line-too-long: filed as 484616 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 02:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483933] Review Request: perl-autobox - Call methods on native types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090226.n192QlW2015469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483933 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 02:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482856] Review Request: perl-MooseX-POE - Moose wrapper around a POE::Session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090242.n192gZqj017986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482856 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 03:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:46:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090346.n193k2kk032536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caio at dejieshi.com --- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-08 22:46:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Anyone can help me? fedora-review flag should be set '?' by contributor for primary reviewer to review. Since you are not sponsored packager, I could not be the primary reviewer for you. This is because pre-sponsored contributor's package review request could only be reviewed by sponsor. I could do pre-review for you instead. Once it is generally done, please set the fedora-review flag to '?' for sponsors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 04:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090408.n1948WUE001321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #11 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-08 23:08:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331277) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331277) build log file Check the last lines (I used mock to build it on my F10): checking for GTHREAD... yes checking for GCONF... configure: error: Package requirements (gconf-2.0 >= 2.0.0) were not met: No package 'gconf-2.0' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables GCONF_CFLAGS and GCONF_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Z5wTJb (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Z5wTJb (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 04:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090437.n194bAjA006066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #6 from John Guthrie 2009-02-08 23:37:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > [-] Other source files are included: > > Please check the status and the necessity of using the files in > > src/com/sun and de/calcom as they appear to come from other projects. > > The short story is that from what I can tell, these files actually are imported > into the files for this project. I will talk more about this later when it is > not 2AM and I am needing sleep. ;-) This could end up being a bit of a mess. Just looking at the file com/sun/demo/ExampleFileFilter.java, the class defined by this file gets imported into three different files under com.lightdev. Moreover, these files use methods that are defined in ExampleFileFilter.java. It would be difficult to extricate this class from the com.lightdev tree without making semi-substantial changes to the code. On further inspection, one also sees that the ExampleFileFilter class extends the FileFilter class. The documentation for that class can be found here: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/javax/swing/filechooser/FileFilter.html According to that page, the FileFilter class is in fact an abstract class, so it is expected that a subclass will be written in order to implement this class. It appears that this particular subclass, ExampleFileFilter, was written to, well, be an example implementation. However, I am guessing that the example code did everything that the simplyhtml upstream wanted, and so they just used it directly, rather than writing their own implementation. Fortunately, ExampleFileFilter.java has a 3-clause BSD license with no advertising clause. Similar comments apply to ElementTreePanel.java. All of the de.calcom code has been placed under GPL just like the rest of the com.lightdev code. IT turns out that the lightdev.com and calcom.de domains are owned by the same person, one Ulrich Hilger. Moreover, looking at the calcom.de web site, it would appear that calcom.de was a previous name for lightdev.com. Based on this, it would seem safe to assume that the de.calcom code is part of the "same" project as the com.lightdev code. Is there anything that we would need to worry about with the com.sun.demo code having a BSD license vs. the rest of the code having a GPL license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 04:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090457.n194vEWW009349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-08 23:57:13 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090505.n1955HkG013724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-09 00:05:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1114202 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 47decfa5a040292ad7f5a5b9088baf0c Lingua-StopWords-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=13, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.15 CPU) + Package perl-Lingua-StopWords-0.09-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(Lingua::StopWords) = 0.09 perl(Lingua::StopWords::DA) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::DE) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::EN) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::ES) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::FI) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::FR) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::HU) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::IT) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::NL) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::NO) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::PT) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::RU) = 0.08 perl(Lingua::StopWords::SV) = 0.08 Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484315] Review Request: perl-Class-Exporter - Export class methods as regular subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090541.n195feml019552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484315 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484313] Review Request: perl-Class-Can - Inspect a class/method and say what it can do (and why) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090541.n195fTha017324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090544.n195iF5N017559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-09 00:44:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build= >http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1108595 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 88ce02329f0437505ca1ef429b75e66f EnvisageCore-3.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) Add examples to %doc After installed this package I am unable to run test as python /usr/share/doc/python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1/examples/Hello\ World/hello_world.py ==> got following traceback error ImportError: No module named preferences.api Can this be fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090549.n195nSsN018411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 05:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090549.n195nRPY018391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484323 Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-09 00:49:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Lingua-StopWords Short Description: Stop words for several languages Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090606.n1966rK7021709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |484320 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484318] Review Request: perl-HTML-DOMbo - Convert between XML::DOM and XML::Element trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090606.n1966Mjh021630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484318 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484320] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball - Perl interface to Snowball stemmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090606.n1966rev021689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484320 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |484323 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 06:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 01:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484293] Review Request: perl-Time-Progress - Elapsed and estimated finish time reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090607.n1967Dog021802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484293 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 08:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 03:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] New: Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 Summary: Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: madko at linuxed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, musuruan at gmail.com, felipe.contreras at gmail.com, itamar at ispbrasil.com.br, erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl, jussi.lehtola at iki.fi, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 451298 Spec URL: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Screenlets are small owner-drawn applications (written in Python) that can be described as "the virtual representation of things lying/standing around on your desk". Sticknotes, clocks, rulers, ... the possibilities are endless. The goal of the Screenlets base-classes is to simplify the creation of fully themeable mini-apps that each solve basic desktop-work-related needs and generally improve the usability and eye-candy of the modern composited Linux-desktop. More info on: http://www.screenlets.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 08:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 03:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090848.n198mIbB018210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Harald Hoyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Harald Hoyer 2009-02-09 03:48:16 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: udev-extras New Branches: F-9 Owners: harald -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090900.n1990QXv020372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 04:00:23 EDT --- Just to note that a COPYING file was added to pixman: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090909.n1999jJd022606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #26 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-09 04:09:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > OK... I gotcha. Restarted plasma and the icons completely disappered. Leaving > only a list of Languages in the picker and how the program labels the country > codes. > > Let the review begin. Ok, so I think finish it now - the question is maintenance of this patched package... (In reply to comment #25) > Jaroslav... > > OK... I gotta ask a maybe dumb question. I can wait if it is required. I'm only > asking because of the frequency of activity and what seems to be a slow down in > it. > > Since you submitted the last set of changes; does that mean that somebody else > should conduct the review? Anyone can assist this review but assigned person should finish the review. Reviews could be really slow process - I'm waiting for one review months, in other review I'm waiting for packager months... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090921.n199LCoq025302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 04:21:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gtk-vnc Short Description: MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget Owners: rjones berrange Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090926.n199QFFH025612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090929.n199TPuw026099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #27 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-09 04:29:24 EDT --- Understood. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484374] Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090941.n199fWg4029160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-09 04:41:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-uk Short Description: Ukrainian thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090949.n199nVWP031145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-09 04:49:30 EDT --- We have "0.5.1-beta" at http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/thesaurus-ca which refers to the same .oxt so it seems safest to mark it as 0.5.1-0.1.beta -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 09:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 04:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902090955.n199tocM000861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-09 04:55:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-ca Short Description: Catalan thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 10:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 05:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091041.n19AfnXj010647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eli at orbsky.homelinux.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |eli at orbsky.homelinux.org --- Comment #20 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-09 05:41:47 EDT --- NON SHOW STOPPERS ----------------- 1) Not a show stopper, but, I had to grab rb_libtorrent-0.14.1-2 from koji so that I could rebuild on Fedora 10. I don't have Fedora 11 alpha. 2) When rebuilding both rb_libtorrent and qbtorrent from within Konsole the compiling seems to chew up a lot of system resources. From runlevel 3 both rebuilt in a reasonable amount of time. I have no idea if this is a problem with KDE, qt, cmake, gcc... If somebody could help figure this out, it would be great. SHOW STOPPER --------------------- In the Preferences dialog box under languages, country flags appear. They need to be removed to conform to Fedora packaging guidelines. If someone knows how to create a patch to remove them it would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 10:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 05:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091050.n19Ao5Un011199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 David Kovalsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dkovalsk at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 10:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 05:48:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091048.n19AmMum011860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #6 from Anithra 2009-02-09 05:48:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/systemtapguiserver.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/systemtapguiserver-1.0-3.src.rpm Added license text and README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 10:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 05:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091056.n19AusmJ012564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Martin Siv?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Martin Siv?k 2009-02-09 05:56:53 EDT --- Ah, thanks, will do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091120.n19BKiEq019777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #21 from leigh scott 2009-02-09 06:20:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331303) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331303) Patch to remove flags from the preferences menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:17:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091117.n19BHFIn018810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091124.n19BO9Wh020428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #21 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-09 06:24:07 EDT --- I sent the patches to upstream. I am waiting for comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091124.n19BOjeg020521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-09 06:24:44 EDT --- please hold, I will update this ticket as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091129.n19BT84l021641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #22 from leigh scott 2009-02-09 06:29:07 EDT --- Here are the new SRPM & Spec file Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_4/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_4/qbittorrent-1.3.1-7.fc10.src.rpm patch URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_4/qbittorrent_flag.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091136.n19Bapt7022320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #28 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-09 06:36:50 EDT --- Latest SPEC/SRPM files Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Patch URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid/kde-plasma-translatoid-ban-flags.patch As this is simple package, quick review: - rpmlint output clean - OK - country flags removed - OK (see comments #19, #24) - SPEC file - OK - trademarks - OK - koji scratch build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1114840) - OK So for me package looks OK but I'll rather wait for comment on countries flags issue. Let me ask on fedora-kde list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091139.n19BdmfD022631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #23 from leigh scott 2009-02-09 06:39:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > NON SHOW STOPPERS > ----------------- > 1) Not a show stopper, but, I had to grab rb_libtorrent-0.14.1-2 from koji so > that I could rebuild on Fedora 10. I don't have Fedora 11 alpha. > > 2) When rebuilding both rb_libtorrent and qbtorrent from within Konsole the > compiling seems to chew up a lot of system resources. From runlevel 3 both > rebuilt in a reasonable amount of time. I have no idea if this is a problem > with KDE, qt, cmake, gcc... If somebody could help figure this out, it would be > great. > > > SHOW STOPPER > --------------------- > In the Preferences dialog box under languages, country flags appear. They need > to be removed to conform to Fedora packaging guidelines. If someone knows how > to create a patch to remove them it would be good. I have removed the flags :) , I have also noticed that it takes a lot of ram to compile rb_libtorrent and qbittorrent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091149.n19Bn5GE024656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-09 06:49:04 EDT --- Its fairly common for linguistic stuff like dictionaries and thesauri to be updated very frequently especially the ones that work with the OpenThesaurus user-submissions mechanism where a new tarball gets generated if there have been any new additions since the previous spin. The same situation arises for the mythes-de one for example. I can add a line to the spec if that helps clarify it, e.g. #OpenThesaurus reuses the download url for new tarballs if new submissions are accepted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 11:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091158.n19Bww0k026639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 06:58:57 EDT --- ping anyone? :) It would be really good to get this into F11 - it is the "rubygems" of the Haskell world. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091206.n19C6RQN029487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-09 07:06:26 EDT --- If you cannot persuade upstream to use a sane versioning system for the tarball names, please do include an explanation in the spec APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091210.n19CAil7029460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-09 07:10:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Matthias: Do you have any official response from the cacert support mailinglist > yet? The last feedback was what I posted here, that it was "work-in-progress" to get the situation fixed. If you have any further news and/or want to get in touch again with cacert about this, please post any info here! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091209.n19C9W4B029831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #15 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-09 07:09:29 EDT --- Sorry for the delay... (In reply to comment #13) > I can verify that this does indeed build fine with the first line changed to > %define gimpdatadir %(%{_bindir}/gimptool --gimpdatadir || echo blah) > Everything that follows assumes that a similar change has been made. I've added this workaround. > However, I guess it's worth asking what that dependency does that the regular > dependency on gimp doesn't do. We really try to avoid file dependencies out of > a few specific directories because they require the users to download > additional large hunks of metadata. Agreed. The package now requires gimp >= 2:2.0 and I've dropped the dependency on the directory. > Why is the release < 1? It doesn't seem to me that the 2.0.2 tarball upstream > is any kind of prerelease. Uh, that's because I'm a stickler for eye-pleasing and I wanted to reserve the -1 release for the version to import into Fedora CVS. > Unfortunately I can't find any statement of the license version in use. > COPYING is simply v2 of the GPL, which has the usual language about being able > to use any version if the program itself doesn't specify one. That would > indicate that GPL+ is the appropriate license tag, but it would be a good idea > to clarify with upstream because I don't think that's what they intend. I've checked with upstream and they told me I should consider it as GPLv2+. There's a new version in the works which will hopefully clearly mention the license directly in the archive. > * source files match upstream. sha256sum: > 31f9b40822646729be9ff50856e803a59290c119c600a8fdab4b669c4ccf2c1f > gimp-data-extras-2.0.2.tar.bz2 > X does not meet versioning guidelines. OK if I bump it to -1 prior to importing? That leaves us -0.x for review work.... > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * summary is OK. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > ? license field matches the actual license. I can attach an IRC log snippet if necessary. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). > * package installs properly. > * rpmlint is silent. > final provides and requires: > gimp-data-extras = 2.0.2-0.1.fc11 > = > ? /usr/share/gimp/2.0 > gimp Resolved by directly requiring gimp >= 2:2.0 I think... > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no generically named files > * acceptable content New files: Spec file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras.spec SRPM file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras-2.0.2-0.2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091212.n19CC0CD030523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-09 07:11:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-es Short Description: Spanish thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091232.n19CWTgd002647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-09 07:32:28 EDT --- It's C++. Compiling C++ is more resource hungry than e.g. compiling C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091240.n19CepCN003323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #25 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-09 07:40:50 EDT --- Thanks for the info Michael, but it still shouldn't make my computer come to a screeching halt compiling inside Konsole. I've got a 1 gig system on an x86_64. Things should be reasonable, but they aren't. Leigh... OK... I can confirm that the flags have been removed from the compiled program. I will continue with the review. I will do my level best to get it done as quickly as I am able. This is going to be my first review so please be a little patient with me as I want to get this right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091240.n19Ceaqq004404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-09 07:40:35 EDT --- the flags in source is ok, afaik. We simply don't want them *used*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091253.n19CrEoH005923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cabal2spec |Review Request: cabal2spec |- generates spec files for |- generates spec files for |Haskell packages (was: |Haskell packages |haskell-packaging) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091254.n19CsNMM007246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 07:54:22 EDT --- This is the changelog: * Mon Feb 9 2009 Jens Petersen - 0.5-1 - add cabal2spec-diff script to diff current spec against current template - add ghc-doc BR to binlib and lib templates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 12:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages (was: haskell-packaging) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091252.n19Cqs2E006985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 07:52:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm I dunno how long it will be before FPC revisits the Haskell Guidelines. (I guess I need to submit it formally after the initial RFC.) Maybe we can just complete this review and then make any updates later as appropriate? It would be good to have this included in F11 anyway IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091303.n19D35Vq008489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #26 from leigh scott 2009-02-09 08:03:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Thanks for the info Michael, but it still shouldn't make my computer come to a > screeching halt compiling inside Konsole. I've got a 1 gig system on an x86_64. > Things should be reasonable, but they aren't. I had to add another 1Gb or RAM to my machine (2Gb total) as some of the compiling processes take in excess of 700Mb , this forces the PC to start using the swap space (hence the machine runs slower) > > Leigh... OK... I can confirm that the flags have been removed from the compiled > program. I will continue with the review. I will do my level best to get it > done as quickly as I am able. This is going to be my first review so please be > a little patient with me as I want to get this right. No problem :cool: Here are the build logs from mock for Rawhide if it helps. i386 buildlogs URL: http://leigh123.homelinux.com/Rawhide/i386/ x86_64 buildlogs URL: http://leigh123.homelinux.com/Rawhide/x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091306.n19D6bas010632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #26 from Justin Zygmont 2009-02-09 08:06:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > ok, i've fixed most of the problems Andrea pointed out in the last message, > > rpmlint now shows only 2 warnings which I think I have to keep, and I still > > dont see whats wrong with the release tag so far, I welcome any comments. > > * Dosemu 1.4.0 (1.4.0 is the version you declared) has already been released. > So the one you are packaging is a post-release snapshot version and it must > follow this guideline: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > > Therefore 1868svn in the release tag is not acceptable. Release Tag for > Post-Release Snapshot Packages is %{X}.%{alphatag}. In this syntax, %{X} is > the release number increment and %{alphatag} is the checkout string. Well, the best I could do to figure what it should be was to look at other spec files and try to guess, so lets see if this is ok now. > * You are still not updating the changelog after each release. This is wrong. I > already told you. In this way we cannot read the history of the package. no, this is the first RPM so it would make no sense why I need to update the changelog at this point, all I have done is corrected the spec file to try and get it released in the first place. > * desktop-file-install \ > --vendor=fedora \ > --dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications \ > %{SOURCE2} > > You must not use a vendor. Please read: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor ok, removed. > * Categories=System;Emulator; > > The Categories in the desktop file should be changed to "Game;Emulator;". This > is what other emulators use. I didnt want this to be a game category because its not just a game emulator, its a dos emulator, but I have changed it anyways. > * Source: %{name}-%{version}.tgz > Source1: %{name}-freedos-bin.tgz > > Source is missing full URL (which is OK because this is a snapshot package) but > you are not following the guidelines on how to create the snapshot. > > Full URL for Source1 is missing. > > More info about both issues here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL You told me before forget the source URL, you just wanted to know why I was packaging a SVN release, > * BuildRequires: binutils > > This is not required. This dependency is already pulled in by default. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > > * BuildRequires: bison flex > > For constituency with other BR's, please split the above in two lines. Thats done now. > * You are still not following the guidelines about licensing. There are parts > that are not covered by the GPL. You must identify those parts and understand > under what licences they are. > > After that you must update the License tag accordingly. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios I tried, from the information I have available. > * I cannot build the rpm ATM, but it seems to me that the following problems > where not addressed: > > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used. I dont know of any opt flags needed, I remember going over all this stuff, and its not because I just dont know anything, > - Text files are not UTF-8. rpmlint only reported certain files needed to be converted, I dont know that I have to convert every file to UTF now. I've uploaded the updated files to the place listed above at fedorapeople.org, I fixed everything I could find, so in case there are still small errors, its not because I didnt bother to read the guidelines, its easy to see who wrote the docs knows everything about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091307.n19D7hDM010022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #55 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-09 08:07:38 EDT --- try to build with this. %if %docs -BuildRequires: docbook-style-dsssl postgresql_autodoc +BuildRequires: docbook-style-dsssl postgresql_autodoc docbook-utils %endif http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091309.n19D9hYP011367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #27 from Justin Zygmont 2009-02-09 08:09:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Justin? What's the status of this? Well, I fixed everything I could in the last few days, so we'll see how far it gets this time. The rpms work, i'm using them now. Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091314.n19DEPTi012925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #21 from Gratien D'haese 2009-02-09 08:14:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331310) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331310) Validation output of rear-1.7.15 package wrote a script to automate the validation process of a rear package. In this way we're using a consistent way of testing any updates on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091323.n19DNJsQ014022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #28 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-09 08:23:17 EDT --- Good work, I'm sure the reviewer will be much more happy about the package now :o) (In reply to comment #26) > no, this is the first RPM so it would make no sense why I need to update the > changelog at this point, all I have done is corrected the spec file to try and > get it released in the first place. Well, reviewers like to compare to the previous version of the package they were reviewing, and bumping Release and adding %changelog makes them happy :) > > * Categories=System;Emulator; > > > > The Categories in the desktop file should be changed to "Game;Emulator;". This > > is what other emulators use. > > > I didnt want this to be a game category because its not just a game emulator, > its a dos emulator, but I have changed it anyways. Please revert back, this is a violation of the Desktop Menu Specification. I'm sure this is minor enough not to bother you (see comment #24). > > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not used. > > > I dont know of any opt flags needed, I remember going over all this stuff, and > its not because I just dont know anything, Please have a look at the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Just in case you missed anything else there, please make sure that you're familiar with the whole guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091324.n19DOHbh014169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #22 from Gratien D'haese 2009-02-09 08:24:16 EDT --- NEXT ACTIONS: ============ 1/ still need a full review of the package by an approved package maintainer 2/ still need to find a sponsor for myself (see next message to candidate sponsors) Message to (candidate) sponsors: ================================ We have been involved with the following bug reports: * Full reviews made for: 187318 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: mondo 473835 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool 480851 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams * Involved with comments for: 463035 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool 473184 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader 474802 Fedora Package Review NEW medium Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program New release of Relax and Recover (rear) is available: ==================================================== Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.15-1.fc9.src.rpm RPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.15-1.fc9.noarch.rpm b2d1bb5591884dbd39565af24f1287c9 rear-1.7.15-1.fc9.src.rpm SourceForge pages of development version 1.7.15: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835&package_id=287824&release_id=659729 I do not want to overload the bug report. therefore, I added the validation output as an attachment to the report. Thanks, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091333.n19DXsEL016602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #41 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 08:33:50 EDT --- Does not build on Rawhide x86_64: -- checking for modules 'libev;glib-2.0;cairo;pango;pangocairo;x11-xcb;xcb-randr;xcb-xinerama;xcb-event>=0.3.0;xcb-aux>=0.3.0;xcb-atom>=0.3.0;xcb-keysyms>=0.3.0;xcb-icccm>=0.3.0;cairo-xcb;xproto>=7.0.11;imlib2' -- package 'cairo-xcb' not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091333.n19DXjjN017557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #29 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-02-09 08:33:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > > > * Categories=System;Emulator; > > > > > > The Categories in the desktop file should be changed to "Game;Emulator;". This > > > is what other emulators use. > > > > > > I didnt want this to be a game category because its not just a game emulator, > > its a dos emulator, but I have changed it anyways. > > Please revert back, this is a violation of the Desktop Menu Specification. I'm > sure this is minor enough not to bother you (see comment #24). Please do not say inaccurate things! Categories=Game;Emulator; is as legit as Categories=System;Emulator; http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/menu-spec-1.0.html#category-registry Additional Category Description Related Categories Emulator Emulator of another platform, such as a DOS emulator System or Game If you want to discuss this further, please let us move this particular discussion in the Fedora devel ML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484287] Review Request: xconvers - Ham radio convers client similar to IRC for X/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091345.n19DjKeV020341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484287 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091356.n19DuOjO021972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 08:56:23 EDT --- I rebuilt (updated) ghc-zlib - so that it installs correctly and this should actually build again now on rawhide (oops!): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115148 As soon as ghc-6.10.1 has been pushed to f10-updates I will build ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP there too. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-3.fc10.src.rpm (just fixed the URL field) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:57:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091357.n19DvZWQ022331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 13:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:57:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091357.n19DvPWN023303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:14:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091414.n19EEuXI027480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 09:14:55 EDT --- Some general comments first ... > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' can be replaced by: > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -delete The license file issue should be raised upstream. Just adding a link to a mailing list message into the spec file should be sufficient. More comments follow ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091415.n19EFcEw027995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 09:15:38 EDT --- rpmlint output: gtksourcecompletion-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gtksourcecompletion-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The gtksourcecompletion-doc package contains documentation for gtksourcecompletion. 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. The no-documentation warning is OK temporarily until we resolve the license issue. description-line-too-long should be corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091423.n19ENOKo028599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #42 from Michal Nowak 2009-02-09 09:23:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > Does not build on Rawhide x86_64: Does not build on any Fedora. See bug 465759. You have to enable XCB backend in Cairo yourself to build at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091424.n19EOpj2028873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091422.n19EM1Qo028375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-09 09:21:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Anithra: on the website there is a screenshot showing graphing. Is that > > functionality included here? Does it use Draw2D, GEF, BIRT, or something else? > > graphing functionality is included, it uses eclipse-swt Okay, I wouldn't have guessed that, but cool :) > not sure if that needs > to be included in BuildRequires , added it anyway. It's not because it'll be brought in by eclipse-{platform,pde,jdt,etc.}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091424.n19EOfqi030042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 09:24:40 EDT --- - rpmlint output See comment 2. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines Yes, but the very loose standards of Fedora. cf. "gtksourceview" + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora Real license is LGPLv2+. COPYING file needs updating as mentioned in comment 1. + license matches the actual package license - %doc includes license file See comment 1. + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm b031896ce03bef4ca711f9b1e0a34544 / 431699 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture x86_64 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115220 + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: ? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream see comment 1 n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484674] python-dns not available in EPEL4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091430.n19EUu3h030386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484674 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jeff at ocjtech.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484674] python-dns not available in EPEL4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091428.n19ESn6o029819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484674 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, | |jonstanley at gmail.com, | |notting at redhat.com Component|python-dns |Package Review Version|el4 |rawhide AssignedTo|jeff at ocjtech.us |nobody at fedoraproject.org Product|Fedora EPEL |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091430.n19EUiST031932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477870 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091430.n19EUj2I031969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484676 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] New: Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp-1.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Eclipse Data Tools Platform provides extensible frameworks and exemplary tools, enabling a diverse set of plug-in offerings specific to particular data-centric technologies and supported by the DTP ecosystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484674] python-dns not available in EPEL4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091433.n19EXNLE030903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484674 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|Package Review |python-dns Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-02-09 09:33:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-dns New Branches: EL-4 Owners: jcollie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091433.n19EXFRo030853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 09:33:13 EDT --- First some general comments: I've done some vala packages before and they were all named "vala-*" or "*-vala". eg. bug 214227, bug 454668, vala-tools, etc. I suspect we need Vala-specific packaging guidelines in this area. > vscsymbolcompletion.c:63:38: error: vala/valastructvaluetype.h: > No such file or directory We are missing a dependency somehow. vala-devel package does not have this header file. It helps if you could do a Koji scratch build of your package, since that will ensure that all missing BRs have been found. koji build --scratch dist-f11 yourpackage.src.rpm > %setup -q -n vtg-%{version} -n argument not required here (but will be if the package gets a different name ...) > %configure --docdir=%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} Is this right? I would have written: --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} > %doc %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091445.n19Ej5Wg001239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-09 09:45:04 EDT --- Petr: ping. Alive? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:41:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091441.n19Efqve000509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #30 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-09 09:41:50 EDT --- Taking this for official review. Justin: until I do it, please address the remaining Andrea's concerns (optflags) except for the Category=Game nonsense :) I'm reasonably satisfied with your packaging abilities, so am willing to sponsor you once you follow the existing practice and do preliminary reviews of some other packages. See comment #5. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091452.n19Eq5Ki002926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #27 from leigh scott 2009-02-09 09:52:03 EDT --- Buildlogs for the F11 rawhide 1.3.1-7 build i386 buildlogs URL: http://leigh123.homelinux.com/Rawhide/i386/new_1/ x86_64 buildlogs URL: http://leigh123.homelinux.com/Rawhide/x86_64/new_1/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:53:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091453.n19ErYNw003189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-09 09:53:33 EDT --- Okay, here's the review. Just 3 small things and we'll be good to go (lines beginning with non-* need attention; others are fine and just listed for brevity). Thanks! X BuildRequires are proper - do we need a BR/R on SystemTap itself? What about kernel-devel? X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - please wrap line 29 (the pdebuild call) with '\' characters ? macros fine - it would be nice if you s/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{buildroot}/ but it's not the end of the world * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * md5sum matches upstream * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used correctly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output * changelog format okay * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 (but is correctly noarch) * summary and description fine * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * not native, so no rpath, static linking, etc. * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel necessary * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no translations so no locale handling * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs - these look good to me * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output * package includes license text in the package and marks it with %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 14:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091458.n19EwWMN005717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-09 09:58:30 EDT --- Hah, I just need this todaym Ian, I owe you a beer. Taking it for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091513.n19FD2Fl009594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 10:13:01 EDT --- To clarify, these are the remaining issues: - wrong copying file included in tarball: is this a blocker, and could I just bundle the correct COPYING and COPYING.LIB files from the FSF? - package naming: should this ideally be gtksourceview2-completion, GtkSourceCompletion, or something else? - functionality review: the vtg demo should allow this to be tested: http://vtg.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/screencasts/vtg-demo-1.ogg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091520.n19FK4L2009746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 10:20:03 EDT --- $ rpm -qf /usr/include/vala-1.0/vala/valastructvaluetype.h vala-devel-0.5.6-1.fc11.x86_64 The file is in 0.5.6 which is in updates-testing. Unfortunately, I can't do a Koji build until gtksourcecompletion lands. %setup: I put the -n because I'm not sure about the name either. vala-vtg or gedit-vtg? I'd say gedit-vala, since it seems safe to assume the project will be gedit-specific. Thoughts? docdir: agreed, thanks. Let me know which name seems preferable and I'll update the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091523.n19FNdrE010340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-09 10:23:38 EDT --- 0.) This is redundant: Requires: perl(Compress::Zlib) It gets added by the auroreq generator. 1.) rpmlint: perl-KinoSearch.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/KinoSearch/KinoSearch.bs 2.) License: I'm worried about this, and am blocking the review until it is solved. The perldoc reads: Terms of usage for Apache Lucene, from which portions of KinoSearch are derived, are spelled out in the Apache License: see the file "ApacheLicense2.0.txt". While the original code is licensed "GPL+ or Artistic". If my understanding of things is correct, we can't choose "GPL" since it does not permit redistribution when linked with ASL code and we can't choose Artistic either, since it's incompatible with Fedora. I think a clarification and eventually and addition of exception to allow linking with ASL from upstream would be good here. IANAL, I might be completely wrong. Adding spot to CC, he may provide valuable advice. In other respects, the package is perfect: - SPEC file clean and legible - Builds in mock, obeys compiler flags - rpmlint is mostly quiet (see 1.) - requires/provides (mostly, see 0.) sane - ASL license 2.0 text included (heh...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091522.n19FMRvI011723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 10:22:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > To clarify, these are the remaining issues: > - wrong copying file included in tarball: is this a blocker, and could I just > bundle the correct COPYING and COPYING.LIB files from the FSF? This is not a blocker. Just post about it on an upstream mailing list, and then add the URL of that posting as a comment eg in the spec file, just so we know what is happening. > - package naming: should this ideally be gtksourceview2-completion, > GtkSourceCompletion, or something else? Package name is OK according to the guidelines, it's just that I personally think the guidelines are rather weak. Again, this is not a blocker. > - functionality review: the vtg demo should allow this to be tested: > http://vtg.googlecode.com/svn/wiki/screencasts/vtg-demo-1.ogg I can't build vtg yet unfortunately, but I will try this when it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091528.n19FSx57011335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 10:28:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > $ rpm -qf /usr/include/vala-1.0/vala/valastructvaluetype.h > vala-devel-0.5.6-1.fc11.x86_64 > > The file is in 0.5.6 which is in updates-testing. Unfortunately, > I can't do a Koji build until gtksourcecompletion lands. OK got this update. Now I get this error: No translations found for vtg in /home/rjones/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/vtg-0.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64 Sorry, I'm having to do this on Fedora 10 because my Rawhide machine has popped its clogs. > %setup: > I put the -n because I'm not sure about the name either. vala-vtg or gedit-vtg? > I'd say gedit-vala, since it seems safe to assume the project will be > gedit-specific. Thoughts? Personally I don't care - it's something that might need to be raised with packaging committee though. In any case it's not a blocking issue. > docdir: agreed, thanks. > > Let me know which name seems preferable and I'll update the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226493] Merge Review: tix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091528.n19FSncZ011302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226493 --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-02-09 10:28:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I would like to take this review. My interest in tix comes from the python side > and it is always nice to have one more merge review finished. :-) Thanks for taking it. > > I noticed the open review since comment #3 but I have been busy meanwhile. > Sorry. :-) > > The first standard question regarding this issue is the output of rpmlint over > the produced rpms: > > tix.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/tix-i386.conf As you said, this is OK (it's not real config file). > tix.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/tcl8.5/Tix8.4.3/pref/WmDefault.tcl Hm, WmDefault.tcl is used as module if I understand it correctly, so missing shebang is OK, but it's probably also OK to remove executable permission... But I don't know much about it (only what's written in WmDefault.txt), so what do you think? > tix.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: tix-8.4.2-tcl8.5.patch > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm Fixed. > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/twofont.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/notebook.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/combo.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/hierarchy.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/dirlist.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/relation.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/dirtree.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/sl-bar.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/exfile.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/oop/arrows.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/select1.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/pane_vert.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/widgets.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/law_comp.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist_ex3.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/tlist.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tix32.png > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/sl-nobar.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/ARROWS.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist_ex1.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hierarchy.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/pane_horz.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/dirtree.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/lawyer.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/horizontal.gif Fixed. > tix-doc.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/Release-8.4.0.txt Fixed. > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/filesel/fb_comp.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/ctl_wopt.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/select-vert.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist_ex2.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/joe.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hierarchy.png > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/ctl_subw.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/container/pane_add.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/vertical.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tix32.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/tlist/twofont2.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/select.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/arrows.png > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/hlist/hlist1.gif > tix-doc.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/tix-doc-8.4.3/html/gif/tix/intro/ctl_noopt.gif Fixed. > > Note that I am quite aware that some of the those warnings are bogus, with the > firts one being too obvious. :-) > > Nevertheless I would like to hear about the others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091531.n19FVqUI012088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-09 10:31:51 EDT --- A few minor things: - please set the fedora-review flag to ? - change the Requires: on java to be >= (or maybe '='?) 1.5.0 - I prefer to add a short name after dropins: %files %{eclipse_dropin} => %{eclipse_dropin}/dtp - please add a comment above the sed line getting rid of the sun.misc.Compare - should we add some comment(s) stating why we're only building the features we are? And the rest of the review (lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay): X verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs - other than the java one, things look good X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - could you add some line continuations to fix this? X package successfully compiles and builds - is this expected? [javac] 4. ERROR in /home/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/dtp-1.6.1/build/plugins/org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.design/src/org/eclipse/datatools/connectivity/oda/design/impl/InputElementUIHintsImpl.java [javac] (at line 112) [javac] assert (eContainer() instanceof InputElementAttributes); [javac] ^^^^^^ [javac] The method assert(boolean) is undefined for the type InputElementUIHintsImpl * BuildRequires are proper * macros fine * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * md5sum matches upstream - not applicable - other than timestamps, my generated tarball matches the one in the SRPM * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * summary and description good - the description is a bit vague but it is what upstream provides, so ... * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used correctly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output * changelog format okay * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * not native, so no rpath, static linking, etc. * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel necessary * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no translations so no locale handling * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output * package includes license text in the package and marks it with %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091535.n19FZ2pF014390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-09 10:35:00 EDT --- Reopening, invalidly closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091537.n19FbLwT013278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-09 10:37:20 EDT --- FYI, a good solution to get rid of unwanted Provides for plugins and only those is the one we're using in XChat: # do not Provide plugins .so %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %{__cat} << \EOF > %{name}.prov #!%{_buildshell} %{__grep} -v %{_docdir} - | %{__find_provides} $* \ | %{__sed} '/\.so$/d' EOF %define __find_provides %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}.prov %{__chmod} +x %{__find_provides} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091549.n19FnfNp017448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 10:49:38 EDT --- MUST: ? rpmlint: .defs marked executable I went back to my mingw23-libgcrypt review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 and it looks like you ended up removing the *.def files altogether. That definitely fixes rpmlint, and I just tried rebuilding gtk-vnc after removing mingw32-gtk2's *.defs, so MinGW does not need those *.def files, but wouldn't someone trying to compile against libgcrypt on Windows need them? What I don't know is whether they absolutely must have +x permissions. I'm guessing that chmod -x'ing them should be safe, after all, they are just header files. Should they be readded to libgcrypt? + package name + spec file name + package guideline-compliant + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate + license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible + source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded + build dependencies complete + locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale N/A library -> ldconfig N/A relocatable: give reason + own all directories + no dupes in %files + permission + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code N/A large docs => -doc N/A doc not runtime dependent N/A headers in -devel N/A static in -static + if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig N/A if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel N/A devel requires versioned base package N/A desktop file uses desktop-file-install + clean buildroot before install + filenames UTF-8 SHOULD - desc and summary contain translations if available ? package build in mock on all architectures Not tested -- not all dependencies in Fedora yet, thus no Koji + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane N/A other subpackages should require versioned base + if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package + require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091558.n19FwEgV020150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 10:58:13 EDT --- Bizarre: rpm -ql vtg | grep LC_MESSAGES /usr/share/locale/es_AR/LC_MESSAGES/vtg.mo /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/vtg.mo and the intltool dependency (which should pull gettext and gettext-devel; I just dropped the redundant gettext dependency from my .spec) should ensure that these are buildable. Could you check the content of vtg-0.3.2/po and try running 'make' there? We'll find out once GtkSourceCompletion goes in and we can use Koji in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 15:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091558.n19FwP0o020199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 10:58:24 EDT --- Bizarre: rpm -ql vtg | grep LC_MESSAGES /usr/share/locale/es_AR/LC_MESSAGES/vtg.mo /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/vtg.mo and the intltool dependency (which should pull gettext and gettext-devel; I just dropped the redundant gettext dependency from my .spec) should ensure that these are buildable. Could you check the content of vtg-0.3.2/po and try running 'make' there? We'll find out once GtkSourceCompletion goes in and we can use Koji in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091605.n19G5Hbj022319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 11:05:16 EDT --- OK, so once we can resolve the vtg build issue, both reviews should be in good shape. I'm contacting upstream about the licensing text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091605.n19G5lLK022453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 11:05:45 EDT --- I don't even know enough to speculate about *.def files, so I raised a question on the mailing list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-February/000437.html Thanks for the review. I will raise a CVS request next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:11:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091611.n19GBScZ022268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 11:11:26 EDT --- Just noticed a test for LC_MESSAGES in ./configure that might be relevant: it tried compiling a file that includes locale.h, which is in glibc-headers. This is not listed as something that is explicitly pulled in by Koji in the packaging guidelines, but in my experience it's always installed anyway (it can be uninstalled cleanly if you also remove sectool and sectool-gui). Could you check if glibc-headers is installed? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091607.n19G7hel022817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 11:07:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gtk2 Short Description: MinGW Windows Gtk2 library Owners: rjones berrange Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] New: Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Summary: Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Apogee library is used by applications to control Apogee CCDs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091624.n19GOsMe024929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091624.n19GOSC7024831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 11:24:27 EDT --- Just put that link into the spec file when you check it in. Package is APPROVED by rjones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:28:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091628.n19GSFN6026012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 11:28:14 EDT --- Yes, I've got gettext, gettext-devel and glibc-headers. Running 'make install' explicitly in the po directory does install the correct files. Configure indicates that it has found all the right tools. I will attach the build log anyway in case you can see anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091629.n19GTujS027892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libapogee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091628.n19GSvSP027633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 11:28:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331329) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331329) Log file of rpmbuild on Fedora 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091629.n19GTQPl027806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #7 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-02-09 11:29:25 EDT --- I asked on fedora-devel-java-list about the com.sun.* classes, and unfortunately, it looks like since the license of these files includes * You acknowledge that this software is not designed, licensed or intended * for use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any * nuclear facility. they can't be used in Fedora. Here's the mailing list thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-February/msg00008.html For the ExampleFileFilter, it doesn't look like it would be too difficult to patch the code to use the javax.swing.filechooser.FileNameExtensionFilter that was introduced in JDK 1.6 and that provides similar functionality. For the ElementTreePanel, I'm not sure if there's an alternative implementation, but I haven't looked too hard. In the worst case, I guess you could patch out the use of the ElementTreePanel entirely, and then there would be some functionality missing from simplyhtml. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-english-czech - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091632.n19GWRBu027206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 --- Comment #11 from Petr Sklenar 2009-02-09 11:32:26 EDT --- hi, yes I live :) I made changes up your comments, and latest version is here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/stardict-dic-cs_CZ.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/stardict-dic-cs_CZ- 20081201-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-dic-cs_CZ - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091635.n19GZDNo029493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 Petr Sklenar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |stardict-english-czech - |stardict-dic-cs_CZ - czech |czech dictionary for |dictionary for stardict |stardict | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091643.n19Gh2bt029661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #31 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-09 11:43:01 EDT --- Reposting the URLS: SPEC: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu.spec SRPM: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/dosemu-1.4.0-1868svn.src.rpm Jason: Apart from bumping the Release number, it is a good practice to post new URLs each time you change a package, so the reviewer can easily find the latest packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 16:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091653.n19GrGfY032071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-09 11:53:15 EDT --- rpmlint output: libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeee.so.2.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeeu.so.2.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 Please report upstream bug as for libindi. I'll continue later, I have to leave now, but from first view it looks OK for me. License typo - it is GPLv2+ not GPL+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:09:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:09:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091709.n19H9LlK002911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Luke Macken 2009-02-09 12:09:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-shove Short Description: Common object storage frontend Owners: lmacken Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091721.n19HLPGQ006890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2009-02-09 12:21:24 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-1.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what.spec * Mon Feb 09 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0.4-1 - Update to 1.0.4 - Fix the URL I had no luck getting the Sphinx documentation to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091720.n19HKDXv006548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-02-09 12:20:11 EDT --- I will review this. Stand by for a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091727.n19HRfNg006926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-09 12:27:40 EDT --- reclosing, rest in peace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484487] Review Request: perl-Template-Plugin-JavaScript - Encodes text to be safe in JavaScript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091728.n19HS3en008202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484487 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-09 12:28:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091739.n19Hdhub008974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] New: Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-moreunit.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-moreunit-1.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MoreUnit is an eclipse plugin that should assist you writing more unit test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091738.n19HcN10010342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 12:38:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtksourcecompletion Short Description: Completion support for GtkSourceView Owners: salimma Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] New: Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 Summary: Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive-0.10.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Impressive is a program that displays presentation slides. But unlike OpenOffice.org Impress or other similar applications, it does so with style. Smooth alpha-blended slide transitions are provided for the sake of eye candy, but in addition to this, Impressive offers some unique tools that are really useful for presentations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091746.n19HkIhB012089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #51 from Adam Huffman 2009-02-09 12:46:13 EDT --- There are actually other packages that have a higher priority for me now. In particular, I don't really want effectively to maintain the upstream project myself, now that Matt has moved on to other things. Maybe the request should just be closed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: vtg - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091748.n19Hm9Vp012332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 12:48:08 EDT --- checking for VTGPLUGIN... no Ah, of course, I missed a BR on gnome-build-devel. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-vala.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-vala-0.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091749.n19HnDfm011015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 17:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091757.n19HvwVH014598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Armin 2009-02-09 12:57:57 EDT --- I don't think it's a good idea to have INSTALL_DIR = /usr/sbin/stapgui-server hard-coded in the makefile. Do it in the specfile instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091804.n19I4X1O016052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: vtg - Vala |Review Request: gedit-vala |Toys for gEdit |- Vala Toys for gEdit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091807.n19I71ZP016886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(moe at blagblagblag. | |org) --- Comment #38 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-09 13:06:55 EDT --- 0.3.6 is here. @jebba Are you still interested in mlt ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091813.n19IDdYV016373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 13:13:39 EDT --- rpmlint output: gedit-vala.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 16) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091812.n19ICbji016238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 13:12:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331341) Patch to gedit-vala.spec It was missing GConf2-devel. There are some other problems too which I've fixed in this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091818.n19IILit017547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091816.n19IGqEQ017317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091817.n19IHvIf017493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 13:17:57 EDT --- + rpmlint output But better to fix the small problem in comment 11. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines Discussed on fedora-packaging mailing list here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-February/msg00022.html + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license ---------------------------------- This is as far as I got with the review. There is some confusing stuff going on with the documentation in this package. It should appear in /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version} but instead appears directly under /usr/share. ? %doc includes license file ? spec file written in American English ? spec file is legible ? upstream sources match sources in the srpm ? package successfully builds on at least one architecture ? ExcludeArch bugs filed ? BuildRequires list all build dependencies ? %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* ? binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun ? does not use Prefix: /usr ? package owns all directories it creates ? no duplicate files in %files ? %defattr line ? %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ? consistent use of macros ? package must contain code or permissible content ? large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage ? files marked %doc should not affect package ? header files should be in -devel ? static libraries should be in -static ? packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' ? libfoo.so must go in -devel ? -devel must require the fully versioned base ? packages should not contain libtool .la files ? packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file ? packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages ? %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. ? filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: ? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream ? translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ? reviewer should build the package in mock ? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures ? review should test the package functions as described ? scriptlets should be sane ? pkgconfig files should go in -devel ? shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] New: Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Summary: Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tmraz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/tmraz/fipscheck/fipscheck.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/tmraz/fipscheck/fipscheck-1.0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: FIPSCheck is a library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules. The package also provides helper binaries for creation and verification of the HMAC-SHA256 checksum files. This package will be a dependency of openssh and possibly other packages which will have testing support for future FIPS 140-2 validation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091845.n19IjSKB024686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Prarit Bhargava changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 18:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091859.n19IxfT8029064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #7 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-02-09 13:59:40 EDT --- Try this: BuildRequires: python-sphinx ... %build %{__python} setup.py build mkdir tests %{__make} -C docs html ... %doc docs/build/html This works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 19:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091902.n19J2k5p028890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #22 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-09 14:02:45 EDT --- ok, done, http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.25-1.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1115863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 19:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:11:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091911.n19JBbsn031183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #12 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-09 14:11:36 EDT --- Thank you, Kaio. Now I am correcting the specfile. I make a little mistake...haha! Later, I will upload a new specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 19:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091917.n19JH4h5001185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-09 14:17:03 EDT --- Today, eZ Components 2008.2.1 has released : http://ezcomponents.org/resources/news/news-2009-02-09 I have updated ezc-Base to 1.6.1 : SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base-1.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base-1.6.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 19:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483438] Review Request: libindi - Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091926.n19JQ984002395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483438 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 19:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902091948.n19JmiaW008616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(michel.sylvan at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 14:48:43 EDT --- vtg provides vala-gen-project, which generates a skeleton Vala project; the files in /usr/share/vtg/licenses are for the use of the project generator. That being said, there were a couple of errors I introduced during the name change, and there were some tabs in the file too. Fixed now at the same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092004.n19K4hUY012750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 C.M. Connelly changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cmc at math.hmc.edu --- Comment #17 from C.M. Connelly 2009-02-09 15:04:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Alright. I didn't notice that. But anyway, shouldn't we suppose users will > upgrade all machines at once, rather than having mixed version environment > (which sounds like bad idea)? Moreover, it's already there, why remove it now... Just for information, Amanda is supposed to be capable of working with various versions. In our environment, we have machines running CentOS 3 (including the Amanda server), 4, and 5. Updating Amanda on the older machines isn't likely to happen until the machines are replaced or reinstalled unless there's a really good reason to do so. I suspect that other users may have even more heterogenous libraries. On the other hand, part of my setup script is to modify or replace the .amandahosts file, so I'm not bothered either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092018.n19KIvNl015813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #28 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-09 15:18:56 EDT --- Please edit flags at the top of this bug report and set the fedora-review flag to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092026.n19KQWnO017776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092028.n19KSPxV017150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-09 15:28:24 EDT --- (Eli, that's something the reviewer usually does) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092041.n19KfBJe020654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-09 15:41:10 EDT --- > Aren't 'Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig' and 'Requires(postun): > /sbin/ldconfig' missing? No, they are automatic if /sbin/ldconfig is set as scriptlet processor via option -p. [...] * The entire /usr tree is mispackaged: Package must not include directories /usr/include /usr/lib /usr/lib/debug /usr/share /usr/share/man /usr/share/man/man1 /usr/src /usr/src/debug and no files below /usr/src and /usr/lib/debug either. Where files below /usr/include and /usr/lib are needed (in the -devel subpackage), prefix the paths with %_includedir and %_libdir. Use %_mandir as prefix for files below /usr/share/man * It must not include /usr/lib/debug/ as those files are automatically put into the -debuginfo subpackage. * It must not include /usr/share and not anything in /usr/src either, which is another side-effect of using %_prefix/* as a bad catch-all for all files below /usr * Including static libs as plugins makes no sense. It likely loads the *.so or *.so.0 files. Perhaps the *.la, but not the *.a libs. * The %doc file "INSTALL" is irrelevant to your package users. * The %doc file "NEWS" is empty. You can remove it for now and add a guard in %prep which exists if NEWS is larger than zero. Then you can include it. * rpmlint also reports an executable .spec file. * Including the "config.h" autoheader file in the public API is dangerous. Values in it bear the risk of conflicting with any API-user that uses an own config.h file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:42:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092042.n19KgN5n021001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 15:42:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > vtg provides vala-gen-project, which generates a skeleton Vala project; the > files in /usr/share/vtg/licenses are for the use of the project generator. No that's not what I meant. I meant this directory: /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2 which is seemingly [Fedora] documentation, not data. The root cause of the problem seems to be this: %files [...] %doc %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} This should all be in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} (ie. /usr/share/doc/gedit-vala-0.3.2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 20:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092059.n19Kxcr1024950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 15:59:37 EDT --- Ah, my mistake. I was fixing the %configure flag, but the --docdir switch there is actually ignored, and forgot about the actually-effective directive in %install. Fixed now. Per Toshio's email to packaging, is there any preference between gedit-vtg and gedit-vala? For searchability, I'd say gedit-vala makes more sense, but gedit-vtg will be closer to the upstream name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 21:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092114.n19LEbtH028727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-09 16:14:35 EDT --- w.r.t. license, my take is: Original bits are under "GPL+ or Artistic" (perl), derived bits under the ASL2.0; the Fedora list of good license indicates that ASL2.0 is compatible with the terms of the GPLv3, so we should redistribute the entire thing under GPLv3+ (since GPL+ -> GPLv3+ w/o problem). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 21:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092114.n19LEBpZ028649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 16:14:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Ah, my mistake. I was fixing the %configure flag, but the --docdir switch there > is actually ignored, and forgot about the actually-effective directive in > %install. No there still seems to be a problem there. rpm -qlp shows: [...] /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2 /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/AUTHORS /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/COPYING /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/COPYING-GPL /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/COPYING-LGPL /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/ChangeLog /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/INSTALL /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/NEWS /usr/share/gedit-vala-0.3.2/README [...] Can you bump the release number and post some new URLs just in case there is some caching problem at this end. > Fixed now. Per Toshio's email to packaging, is there any preference between > gedit-vtg and gedit-vala? For searchability, I'd say gedit-vala makes more > sense, but gedit-vtg will be closer to the upstream name. I really don't care either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092210.n19MArG7009603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 17:10:52 EDT --- Ah, yes. Not a caching problem -- I use scripts to maintain my reviewed packages, and previously had had to manually push new SRPMS. I simply forgot to upload the new SPRM. Bumped release here: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-vala-0.3.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092231.n19MVHHl018756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092230.n19MUu6L015528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |prarit at redhat.com Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | AssignedTo|prarit at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-09 17:30:54 EDT --- Prarit, please do not close this bug report until a full formal package review has happened and fedora-review+ is set. Both didn't happen, reopening. The bug report must not to be assigned to you, but to a reviewer; resetting as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092233.n19MXgD4016279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #8 from John Guthrie 2009-02-09 17:33:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I asked on fedora-devel-java-list about the com.sun.* classes, and > unfortunately, it looks like since the license of these files includes > * You acknowledge that this software is not designed, licensed or intended > * for use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any > * nuclear facility. > they can't be used in Fedora. Here's the mailing list thread: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-February/msg00008.html > > For the ExampleFileFilter, it doesn't look like it would be too difficult to > patch the code to use the javax.swing.filechooser.FileNameExtensionFilter that > was introduced in JDK 1.6 and that provides similar functionality. > > For the ElementTreePanel, I'm not sure if there's an alternative > implementation, but I haven't looked too hard. In the worst case, I guess you > could patch out the use of the ElementTreePanel entirely, and then there would > be some functionality missing from simplyhtml. I'm sitting here chuckling to myself a little bit because I saw that clause, and I actually thought to myself, "Yeah, I can understand why someone might want to keep Java code out of a nuclear facility. Mmmmm... Java code and nuclear power plants. Two tastes that go great together." I can also understand now why this might be a bad thing from Fedora's point of view. Thanks for the pointer on FileNameExtensionFilter. I'll see what I can do with that for now. I'll also have to keep that "no nukes" clause in mind as well. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092241.n19MfT6V022235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-02-09 17:41:28 EDT --- MUST items: - rpmlint output: 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - package name: OK - spec file name: OK - Packaging Guidelines: OK; the Python guidelines specify that "BuildRequires: python" must appear. It does not in this spec, but that requirement is picked up transitively via gettext. - licensing guidelines: OK - license: FAIL. The top-level gestikk.py is GPLv2+, but gestikk/condparse.py is under an MIT license. - license file - spec file is American English: OK, although I have a couple of suggestions. See below. - spec file is legible: OK - sources match upstream: OK, md5sum is 7f30737f0b69633b1112688c68f4e3d9 - builds into binary RPM: OK - ExcludeArch: OK - BuildRequires: OK (although I would be happer with an explicit python dependency) - Use of %find_lang: OK - ldconfig: OK - relocatable package: OK - own all created directories: OK - no duplicates in %files: OK, although consider merging "%dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}" and "%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/*" into just "%{python_sitelib}/%{name}". - proper permissions: OK - %clean section: OK - consistent use of macros: OK - code or permissible content: OK - large documentation files: OK - %doc files not needed at runtime: OK - header files in -devel: OK - static libraries in -static: OK - Requires: pkgconfig: OK - .so files in -devel: OK - -devel requires base package: OK - no libtool archives: OK - desktop file: OK - don't own files/dirs owned by other packages: OK - clean first in %install: OK - filenames are UTF-8: OK SHOULD items: - license file as separate text: you should ask upstream to include the MIT license as a separate file - description and summary contain translations: OK - builds in mock: did not check - builds on all supported arches: did not check - package functions as described: OK (only lightly tested) - scriptlets are sane: OK - subpackages require main package: OK - placement of pkgconfig files: OK - file dependencies: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 22:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092225.n19MPj2d013657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 --- Comment #4 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-09 17:25:44 EDT --- I am pretty sure that none of the code is under ASL 2.0. The Perl code is derived from Lucene (which is in Java) but it is a rewrite (and not even a straight port like Plucene). The ASL 2.0 in section 4 allows derivative works to have separate copyright as long as the conditions are met. Including the ASL license and the notice in the docs is one of the conditions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902092300.n19N0l6T007204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-09 18:00:46 EDT --- Continuing the review from comment 12 ... + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 132006e82ed6cce5b5ed6ee10b2b63ab / 477402 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture x86_64 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun n/a does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock ? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ---------------------------------------- This package is APPROVED by rjones ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 9 23:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:13:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484798] New: Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 Summary: Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Xiphos (formerly known as GnomeSword) is a Bible study tool written for Linux, UNIX, and Windows under the GNOME toolkit, offering a rich and featureful environment for reading, study, and research using modules from The SWORD Project and elsewhere. NOTE: This is just a rename of the existing gnomesword package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 00:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 19:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] New: Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 Summary: Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acme at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/fedora/python-linux-procfs/python-linux-procfs.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/fedora/python-linux-procfs/python-linux-procfs-0.4.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Abstractions to extract information from the Linux kernel /proc files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 01:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100124.n1A1O3S4024633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 01:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100126.n1A1Q7mU005703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 20:26:05 EDT --- *** Bug 483301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 01:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100126.n1A1Q6LB005678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-09 20:26:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484591 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 01:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100138.n1A1cTiE027232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-09 20:38:28 EDT --- Thanks for the updates. I have updated the packages. I am working on your other review too! http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss-1.1-4.fc10.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-simple-rss.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 01:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100138.n1A1cja9007651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #8 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-09 20:38:44 EDT --- Things are looking good here. I am quite sorry for taking so long. I forgot about this one until I got back to my mail. Can you mark the README, COPYING and CHANGELOG as %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 02:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100220.n1A2KU15016579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-09 21:20:29 EDT --- Cgilib 0.7 was just released with the autotools patch applied: Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 02:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100224.n1A2OXOv004191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike at flyn.org --- Comment #2 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-09 21:24:32 EDT --- I've tested everything except for building in mock. Hopefully I will get around to that this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 02:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100222.n1A2Me0X017110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at flyn.org --- Comment #1 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-09 21:22:38 EDT --- *** Bug 428832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 04:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 23:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100402.n1A42c2b005711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-09 23:02:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Can you mark the README, COPYING and CHANGELOG as %doc? I guess these are already marked as %doc as: ---------------------------------------------------- %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 04:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 23:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100407.n1A47PJI025875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Katz 2009-02-09 23:07:24 EDT --- Spec file looks fine; I'm not a huge fan of macro-ifying versions, but that's purely a style question. rpmlint reports telepathy-farsight.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 8) telepathy-farsight-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation The latter of which seems fine, the former should probably be fixed since it's trivial but I trust you'll do that on import The only thing that really pops out at me is that /usr/include/telepathy-1.0 is owned by the telepathy-filesystem package. Maybe just have -devel depend on that instead since it's going to be there for any real telepathy stack usage anyway? Also, have you contacted upstream about killing the rpath? Although it looks like it might just be getting pulled in due to whatever version of autotools they've got rather than anything explicit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 04:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 23:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100416.n1A4Go1x008238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-09 23:16:49 EDT --- You can optionally add %doc to %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/. If you feel like changing it, please do so before submitting final builds. I did this with some of my gems. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 04:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 23:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100418.n1A4IL9R008413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-09 23:18:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gedit-vala Short Description: Vala Toys for gEdit Owners: salimma Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 04:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 23:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100438.n1A4cNZ9031490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-09 23:38:22 EDT --- Before starting review 1)just wonder why linux word used in project name? Can you drop that name and make it upstream also like python-procfs? 2) I can't see any license text in .py files and any separate license text file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 05:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100506.n1A56ddu004280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mastahnke at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 05:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100506.n1A563Ar004098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 00:06:01 EDT --- Thank you! (I will check your review request later again) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-hpricot Short Description: A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: (nobody) (In reply to comment #10) > You can optionally add %doc to %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/. Usually this is redundant because this is included in "-doc" subpackage (this is not java package, however -javadoc packages are similar to this situation) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 05:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100521.n1A5LgiY020266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-10 00:21:39 EDT --- Oops reread that and yep. You're quite right. Sorry Leigh. Anyway... I think things are OK... So you get a passing grade of fedora-review + :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 05:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100550.n1A5oKdl025497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 --- Comment #8 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-10 00:50:19 EDT --- I do not see rest of the points from comment #3 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 07:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100702.n1A72bCN024442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-10 02:02:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > w.r.t. license, my take is: > > Original bits are under "GPL+ or Artistic" (perl), derived bits under the > ASL2.0; the Fedora list of good license indicates that ASL2.0 is compatible > with the terms of the GPLv3, so we should redistribute the entire thing under > GPLv3+ (since GPL+ -> GPLv3+ w/o problem). Mostly right. Yes. I don't know why I thought ASL2.0 is incompatible with all GPL versions. I was even looking at the compatibility matrix and did not notice that. One small correction would be that the resulting license is "GPLv3" not "GPLv3+", since we can't tell whether ASL is compatible with license that doesn't even exist. Much thanks for pointing this out Chris, I've obviously not have figured that myself and it clarifies things a lot. (In reply to comment #4) > I am pretty sure that none of the code is under ASL 2.0. The Perl code is > derived from Lucene (which is in Java) but it is a rewrite (and not even a > straight port like Plucene). The ASL 2.0 in section 4 allows derivative works > to have separate copyright as long as the conditions are met. Including the > ASL license and the notice in the docs is one of the conditions. I've really looked at the code yesterday and haven't found anything copied from lucene, so my feelings are that the ASL license is here "just in case". So my recommendations here are either of 1.) Set the License to "GPLv3" and comment appropriately 2.) Ensure (check with upstream) there's no ASL code, remove the ASL license file and leave License set to "GPL+ or Artistic" (recommended, but don't do that w/o contacting upstream) This can't block a review: APPROVED Please address the points 0.) and 1.) of comment #2 upon import. (I'll check! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 07:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100740.n1A7eYaX011913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-10 02:40:32 EDT --- Hmm, why do you BR: python-setuptools if you don't use it? Shouldn't the build and install phases look like %build %{__python} -c 'import setuptools; execfile("setup.py")' build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} %{__python} -c 'import setuptools; execfile("setup.py")' install --skip-build -- root %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 07:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:40:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100740.n1A7eVZS011880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:02:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100802.n1A82rb7002797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-10 03:02:52 EDT --- Nevermind, the package itself uses setuptools and thus the above is not necessary. However, you might be missing one %install line; according to the Python packaging guidelines (PPG) "If your module is using distutils or setuptools, use the following commands during %install: %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" On the other hand, the package builds the .pyc and .pyo files with the one command you have. Maybe you can enlighten me about the effect of the -O1 switch? Suggestions: - Drop BR on python devel and change BR from python-setuptools to python-setuptools-devel as in PPG. - Change %SOURCE0 line to use %{version} (and maybe %{oname} also?). - Add a line break before %description and delete the one after it to improve legibility. ------------ Package adheres to Packaging Review Guidelines. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:08:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100808.n1A88AXd016771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-10 03:08:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This Review Request have been opened before (bug #483301) but someone with > personality issues have closed that bug. Let us hope he doesn't taint this one. Orcan, I appreciate your Fedora work, and I can understand that you have issues with a certain person. But you *MUST* stop offending other Fedora contributors. Stop writing: "please do not post in my bugs" and certainly don't accuse other contributors of "personality issues". You may disagree on technical grounds with Ralf and so do others of us from time to time. But *YOUR* behaviour here is completely unacceptable, you need to *STOP* this immediately! There is a huge difference between discussing about technical issues and sometimes being rather stubborn about them (Ralf) and between anti-social behaviour. it is *YOU* who is way out of line here not Ralf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:14:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100814.n1A8EObc017763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-10 03:14:23 EDT --- With that said, and hopefully made very clear! I would like to review this package as I think it is great that someone is working on moving packages from planetccrma into Fedora proper. The Epoch is fine, but with the other 2 issues I have to side with Ralf, using "AutoProv: no" is not acceptable, your package will miss essential requires and adding them manually is error prone and will break when the soname's of libraries you use change (and you do a rebuild). The correct solution here is to use filtering of the generated provides as explained in the previous review request. Also the warnings are serious and need fixing, Ralf has already explained how (replace "%d" with "%zd"), let me know if there are other warnings which you need help fixing. Can you please do a new revision with these 2 issues fixed? then I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100828.n1A8SKUt020390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-10 03:28:19 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 6626b490c5b62a796e6272126e4ff6e8 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package is need and ok. OK rpmlint is silent. fipscheck-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - The devel package don't have to contain documentation. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. The script ltmain.sh is under GPLv2+ but you are not installing this file, so the licence is ok as is. Could you please explain the line below? Couldn't you change automake to install it in right place? mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libfipscheck.so.* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100832.n1A8Wkjm008432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Mraz 2009-02-10 03:32:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The script ltmain.sh is under GPLv2+ but you are not installing this file, so > the licence is ok as is. Of course. > Could you please explain the line below? Couldn't you change automake to > install it in right place? > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libfipscheck.so.* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib} I could probably use --libdir in %configure, but I'd have to move the devel .so symlink to _libdir then so I don't think it make much sense to do that. This library is very small and it can be potential dependency of binaries which will reside in /sbin so I have to put it in /%{_lib}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100842.n1A8g3AV010221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-10 03:42:02 EDT --- Oops, the solution I provided for filtering is faulty, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484837 %{__sed} '/\.so$/d' needs to be: %{__sed} '/\.so\(()(64bit)\)\?$/d' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100847.n1A8lPXA011177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-10 03:47:23 EDT --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 08:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100854.n1A8sKII012319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 03:54:18 EDT --- (Note that I mailed to Orcan privately...) (In reply to comment #3) > The correct solution here is > to use filtering of the generated provides as explained in the previous review > request. - As Kevin said in the comment 4 (and as I reported on the bug 484837), the filtering method proposed on the previous review request is not correct on x86_64 (In reply to comment #4) > Oops, the solution I provided for filtering is faulty, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484837 > > %{__sed} '/\.so$/d' needs to be: %{__sed} '/\.so\(()(64bit)\)\?$/d' - This time it is not correct on i386. > Also the warnings are serious and need fixing, Ralf has already explained how > (replace "%d" with "%zd"), let me know if there are other warnings which you > need help fixing. - Would you explain why you "particularly" mention these warnings? These warnings all comes from (f)printf with passing incorrect format, however I have already seen in other review requests that many warnings which seemed more and more critical than this (like one related to implicit function declaration you mentioned before) were just ignored. Of course I admit that fixing these warnings are desirable, however I am against making these warning the "blocker" for this review request. If you surely think these warnings are blockers, would you propose fedora-packaging-list about what warnings should be treated as review blockers? It is really appreciated because I had repeatedly been asked "is it a blocker??" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100906.n1A96aFe028544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-10 04:06:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Also the warnings are serious and need fixing, Ralf has already explained how > > (replace "%d" with "%zd"), let me know if there are other warnings which you > > need help fixing. > > - Would you explain why you "particularly" mention these warnings? > These warnings all comes from (f)printf with passing incorrect format, > however I have already seen in other review requests that > many warnings which seemed more and more critical than this > (like one related to implicit function declaration you mentioned > before) were just ignored. > Of course I admit that fixing these warnings are desirable, however > I am against making these warning the "blocker" for this review > request. > If you surely think these warnings are blockers, would you propose > fedora-packaging-list about what warnings should be treated as > review blockers? > It is really appreciated because I had repeatedly been asked > "is it a blocker??" As Ralf has demonstrated these warnings are usually a real issue, which only shows on 64 bit systems. But usually these are in debug printf's and thus quite often people don't care about fixing them. I agree this is not something which we normally block reviews on. So I wont do that in this case either. Still this something which really should be fixed, so consider this a should fix item. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100906.n1A96fhp028577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #3 from D Haley 2009-02-10 04:06:40 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-2.12.18-2.src.rpm rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gri-2.12.18-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/gri-2.12.18-2.fc10.i386.rpm gri.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1116786 Changelog: * Tue Feb 10 2009 D Haley 2.12.18-2 - Cleared many old changelog entries by D, Kelly & T Powers (year<=2005) - Drop readline buildreq. - Fix lic. GPLv2 to GPLv2+ - Create emacs subpackages - Fix release line to include dist macro >License is GPLv2+, not GPLv2. Done. >Remove Requires: readline, this is automatically picked up. Done. >Remove pushd and popd from setup, you don't need them. Done. >Change make command to make %{?_smp_mflags} as this works fine. The paths are already set by %configure. Done. >Replace "rm -Rf" with "rm -rf" to be consistent. Done. >Absolute paths in %files need to be replaced with %{_bindir}, %{_datadir} and so on. Whoops. Fixed. >Changelog is way too long, IMHO you may remove everything that is before 2006. I removed all but the last entry before myself, just to make it clear that this is based upon someone else's work. >You'll have to branch the emacs script in its own subpackage, as gri probably works without it. Created subpackages emacs-%{name} and emacs-%{name}-el. I am not an emacs user, (brought up on vi(m)) so this is based upon reading refs [1-3]. So there may be a mistake in my understanding here. [1] http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs_lisp#Source_code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100909.n1A99MCC016042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2009-02-10 04:09:21 EDT --- Correct SRPM url: SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gri-2.12.18-2.fc10.src.rpm (The other one now links to the same file, but has the wrong name). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100913.n1A9Do7O017009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Tomas Mraz 2009-02-10 04:13:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fipscheck Short Description: A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules Owners: tmraz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100926.n1A9Q0lu000512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #24 from Anithra 2009-02-10 04:25:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > X BuildRequires are proper > - do we need a BR/R on SystemTap itself? What about kernel-devel? We wont need it as this can run on machines without systemtap(even on windows.). The probes and functions wont be listed in the IDE but apart from that it should work fine as the script is sent to the server for execution. > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - please wrap line 29 (the pdebuild call) with '\' characters done. > ? macros fine > - it would be nice if you s/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{buildroot}/ but it's not the > end of the world done. SPEC URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100927.n1A9RbiP020299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-10 04:27:36 EDT --- > > %{__sed} '/\.so$/d' needs to be: %{__sed} '/\.so\(()(64bit)\)\?$/d' > - This time it is not correct on i386. It is, see bug 484837. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225744] Merge Review: fbset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100929.n1A9TjVJ001017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225744 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Prikryl 2009-02-10 04:29:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > There is something in the guidelines about %makeinstall: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used > Since "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}" doesn't work and fbset doesn't use libtool or autotools stuff, I'd not remove the %makeinstall macro. > And I have seen this: > > MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in > bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on > that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the > corresponding ExcludeArch line. > I created the bug and write ID to the spec file. Check cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100950.n1A9oLm3005672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-10 04:50:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > As Ralf has demonstrated these warnings are usually a real issue, which only > shows on 64 bit systems. But usually these are in debug printf's and thus quite > often people don't care about fixing them. I agree this is not something which > we normally block reviews on. So I wont do that in this case either. Still this > something which really should be fixed, so consider this a should fix item. That's why I had labeled it "SHOULD". It's a classic of the 32bit->64bit portability problems. It is broken code which is guaranteed to be non-functional under certain conditions. The only question is when this bug will hit, not if this will this will hit. Due to the nature of size_t, such kind of bugs show when some variable will exceed sizeof(int) (4GB) or when some computations will be performed on size_t's. The former will usually only cause visible problems in "big use-cases", while the later usually shows as "corrupt output". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100952.n1A9qVjs025560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 04:52:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > %{__sed} '/\.so$/d' needs to be: %{__sed} '/\.so\(()(64bit)\)\?$/d' > > - This time it is not correct on i386. > > It is, see bug 484837. Yes, I missed the question mark. By the way this package does no build on dist-f11 (koji) One issue is g++44 issue, however there is another. configure says: ----------------------------------------------- checking for DocBook V4.1... no configure: WARNING: DocBook 4.1 DTD not found or not usable - documentation will not be built ----------------------------------------------- config.log says: ----------------------------------------------- configure:19341: checking for DocBook V4.1 onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:8:19:E: "X21B6" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:9:19:E: "X21B7" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:10:17:E: "X21D3" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:11:18:E: "X21CA" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:12:18:E: "X21C3" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:13:18:E: "X21C2" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:14:18:E: "X21DA" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:15:17:E: "X219E" is not a function name onsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2-1.0-42.fc11/ent/iso-amsa.ent:16:18:E: "X21C7" is not a function name ........................ ........................ ------------------------------------------------- I am not sure what is causing this, because - with dist-f10-updates-candidate, checking for DocBook V4.1... returns yes - My local build passes this point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 09:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225744] Merge Review: fbset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902100958.n1A9wLU1007209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225744 Adrian Reber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Adrian Reber 2009-02-10 04:58:20 EDT --- I am just mentioning the ExcludeArch bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484843 Rest looks good. Source matches upstream. Patches look good. I am not 100% happy with the %makeinstall, but it seems that it creates no problems in this case. So: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449207] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101002.n1AA291v008276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449207 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-10 05:02:05 EDT --- Reset review flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101011.n1AABYRm010198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101020.n1AAKbVu031900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #8 from Anithra 2009-02-10 05:20:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I don't think it's a good idea to have > > INSTALL_DIR = /usr/sbin/stapgui-server > > hard-coded in the makefile. Do it in the specfile instead. This was actually redundant, removed it from the makefile. Spec URL: http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stapgui/systemtapguiserver.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/stapgui/systemtapguiserver-1.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101030.n1AAUZ0t002025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |483205 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:30:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101030.n1AAUY4c001983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 |483543 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101026.n1AAQoGw001111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #25 from Anithra 2009-02-10 05:26:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #20) > > (In reply to comment #19) > > > Anithra: on the website there is a screenshot showing graphing. Is that > > > functionality included here? Does it use Draw2D, GEF, BIRT, or something else? > > > > graphing functionality is included, it uses eclipse-swt > > Okay, I wouldn't have guessed that, but cool :) :). Planning to replace with something more sophisticated in the next release. Will discuss this by mail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101051.n1AApPME006674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101049.n1AAn7Li005882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 11:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101101.n1AB1eD7009118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #31 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 06:01:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Oops reread that and yep. You're quite right. Sorry Leigh. > > Anyway... I think things are OK... So you get a passing grade of fedora-review > + :). Hi Eli, Thanks for reviewing qbittorrent. Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 10:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101057.n1AAvEqN020215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #22 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-10 05:57:12 EDT --- Upstream accepted the patches.They should properly appear in the upstream git soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 11:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101100.n1AB0cwu021163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-10 06:00:37 EDT --- I will make a full review soon but I can't sponsor you. You should make some informal reviews and/or submit more packages and add a note here ti find a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 11:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101135.n1ABZbSn029018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #23 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-10 06:35:36 EDT --- Hey Mamoru, I am thinking that maybe I should change the name of the package from cloog to cloog-ppl, as this branch of the package is really intended to be compiled with the ppl backend only. When compiled with say the polylib backend, it becomes another library as include/cloog/polylib_backend.h is then included by cloog.h and induces a new API. In that case a new package cloog-polylib would then be generated. Also, cloog-ppl (that is at http://repo.or.cz/w/cloog-ppl.git) really is a special branch of the cloog tree (that is at http://repo.or.cz/w/cloog.git) where the ppl backend branch work is happening. It will be later merged back into the cloog main tree, after gcc 4.4 is released. So gcc 4.4 will be based on cloog-ppl, whereas gcc 4.5 is likely to be based on cloog, after cloog-ppl is merged back into the main tree. What do you think about this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101211.n1ACBFef024325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-10 07:11:14 EDT --- Thanks. packages has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101235.n1ACZZEU029833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 07:35:33 EDT --- Well, do you want to "re"submit a new review request for ppl once cloog-ppl is merged to ppl main tree? When the srpm name is to be renamed, we have to submit another review request for it. If not, I think the less troublesome way is to create cloog-ppl(-devel) binary rpms from ppl srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101241.n1ACfPLG031335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 07:41:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > If not, I think the less troublesome way is to create > cloog-ppl(-devel) binary rpms from ppl srpm. Of course "from cloog srpm", sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 12:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101252.n1ACq5Y5014262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #52 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 07:51:59 EDT --- Thank you for reply. So, when you have some time to work on this software again, please feel free to submit a new review request and mark this bug a duplicate of the new one. Anyway I appreciate your work. Once closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 13:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101303.n1AD3Hg9004087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #2 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-02-10 08:03:16 EDT --- 1) Because procfs also exists in other OSes, such as Solaris, where this idea, AFAIK, came from. And the files parsed have very much Linux specific keys and formats, so having "linux" in the name is needed. 2) All the .py files state that the files are under GPLv2, as does the specfile License tag. Is it really a requirement that even with this clearly stated we need a copy of the license in a LICENSE named file? If that is the case, sure, I can do it, and will as well as to submit a patch for rpmlint to warn about that :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 13:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101345.n1ADjQY6013576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(louizatakk at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-10 08:45:25 EDT --- Do you need any more help to bring this into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 14:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101413.n1AEDvFg000750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-10 09:13:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1) Because procfs also exists in other OSes, such as Solaris, where this idea, > AFAIK, came from. And the files parsed have very much Linux specific keys and > formats, so having "linux" in the name is needed. > That is ok then. > 2) All the .py files state that the files are under GPLv2, as does the specfile > License tag. Is it really a requirement that even with this clearly stated we > need a copy of the license in a LICENSE named file? > > If that is the case, sure, I can do it, and will as well as to submit a patch > for rpmlint to warn about that :-) SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I will say that either you can add license text as header in all .py files or include separate license text file. see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text you can then include license file as %doc 3) F6 is already EOL and since F7 we have python >= 2.5 so you can change %if "%{python_ver}" >= "2.5" %{python_sitelib}/*.egg-info %endif to %{python_sitelib}/*.egg-info only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 14:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477870] Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101420.n1AEK9M8022372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Mat Booth 2009-02-10 09:20:07 EDT --- Built successfully for all requested branches, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 14:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:20:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101420.n1AEKBMX022432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Bug 484676 depends on bug 477870, which changed state. Bug 477870 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf - Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477870 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 14:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101433.n1AEXne0025313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 --- Comment #3 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-10 09:33:47 EDT --- Hi, Thank you for taking this review. I'll contact upstream and update the review ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 14:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101434.n1AEY1ZC025390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 J?rg Schilling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling at fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #11 from J?rg Schilling 2009-02-10 09:33:59 EDT --- Cdrdao is no longer actively maintained (the last feature enhancement was 3 years ago). Cdrdao uses an extremely old libscg variant and if you care about cdrdao, this libscg needs to be updated with recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ Note that you cannot use the library from cdrtools fork distributed by readhat as this fork is in conflict with GPL and Copyright and cannot be legally distributed. The original software however has been approved by Sun legal as free software without known legal problems. BTW: Another reason for not using the fork is that the fork is not actively maintained since nearly two years and as the fork is full of well documented bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101509.n1AF9Nxd001410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-10 10:09:22 EDT --- Oops, forgot to mention that I haven't had a chance to talk to upstream about the rpath issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:09:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101509.n1AF9BVR001370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #13 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-10 10:09:10 EDT --- Now I have updated the specfile. Here is the URL: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux.spec Here is SRPM url?http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux-0.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm I hope someone can help me. Kaio?could you help me again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:08:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101508.n1AF8Qu1013676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-10 10:08:25 EDT --- Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-farsight.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/telepathy-farsight-0.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Feb 10 2009 Brian Pepple - 0.0.4-2 - Add devel requires on telepathy-filesystem. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1117361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101514.n1AFEiQS002852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Katz 2009-02-10 10:14:43 EDT --- Probably worth doing, but certainly not a blocker for getting it in given the workaround present. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101512.n1AFCe1B014996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-10 10:12:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events Short Description: Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 I'll make a modified tarball without the *.plx file as upstream didn't reply until now. Thus we're fine from Fedora Legal aspects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101521.n1AFL20N004608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 --- Comment #12 from Denis Leroy 2009-02-10 10:21:01 EDT --- Cdrdao is essentially in "patch acceptance only" mode. We can't use libscg, for the well known licensing issues which I don't want to get into, but also because of the broken way it does device scanning. Anyways, this is about the cdrdao merge review, and cdrdao now has to be compiled without libscg with the '--without-scg' option. It then uses the native sg interface and works just fine (although you'll want to use the current CVS trunk). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101528.n1AFSHbA018854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #4 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-02-10 10:28:16 EDT --- Ok, I'll add the LICENSE text and will add is as %doc. 3) That is myself trying to share the same specfile with other distros, from Red Hat, that still don't have eggs, like RHEL5 and 4 :-) If there is no problem in leaving this, I'd prefer to have just one spec file. Do you have any other suggestions before I tag 0.4.4 and push a new tarball out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101532.n1AFWLV7007868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 --- Comment #13 from J?rg Schilling 2009-02-10 10:32:20 EDT --- Please do not spread unproven claims. There are no "well known license issues", there hoewever is a deffamation campaign against free software run by some Debian guys. Cdrtools had a full in depth license review done by the Sun legal department in Autum 2008 and no license problem was found. The Sun legal department found that there is no problem from letting GPLd software use CDDLs libraries. On the other side, the cdrtools fork currently distributed by redhat cannot be distributed legally as it is in conflict with GPL and Copyright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101538.n1AFcZOf021308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101541.n1AFfSxZ022171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-10 10:41:27 EDT --- Thanks for the changes. It looks good. This package is approved. Now you need to apply for sponsorship (I'll sponsor you -- see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join) and do the fedora-cvs stuff (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure). Then you'll need to close this bug as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process . Thanks, Anithra! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101540.n1AFeknY022023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-10 10:40:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: telepathy-farsight Short Description: telepathy client to handle media streaming channels Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464016] Review Request: eclipse-findbugs - Eclipse plugin for FindBugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101544.n1AFijdN022799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464016 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-10 10:44:44 EDT --- Hi Jerry, This package generally looks okay but it needs to be updated for the new Eclipse plugin packaging guidelines for post-3.4 (we're using the p2 dropins functionality now). When you have time to update it, let me know and I'll do a formal review. Andrew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101549.n1AFnJwQ013177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 --- Comment #14 from Denis Leroy 2009-02-10 10:49:18 EDT --- This needs to move somewhere else, I don't want to get into the whole licensing debate nonsense, and it's irrelevant to this review. The fact remains: libscg can't be used on linux distros for purely technical reasons (device scanning, ConsoleKit support), and I don't even know why cdrdao used it in the first place. The current cdrdao CVS trunk can be compiled to use the native SG interface, and if something doesn't work I'll commit the necessary patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 15:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101553.n1AFrth9025720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-10 10:53:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ok, I'll add the LICENSE text and will add is as %doc. > ==> thanks. > 3) That is myself trying to share the same specfile with other distros, from > Red Hat, that still don't have eggs, like RHEL5 and 4 :-) If there is no > problem in leaving this, I'd prefer to have just one spec file. ==>That is valid reason then. you can keep if..endif > > Do you have any other suggestions before I tag 0.4.4 and push a new tarball > out? ===> yes. check rpmlint on binary rpm python-linux-procfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/python_linux_procfs-0.1-py2.5.egg-info you need to chmod 644 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/python_linux_procfs-0.1-py2.5.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101611.n1AGBCcq020083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 --- Comment #15 from J?rg Schilling 2009-02-10 11:11:11 EDT --- Do not try to discuss techical stuff if you miss the needed background. information. libscg works perfectly on Linux _because_ of device scanning and all people who reported problems with the illegal software distributed with various linix distributions are happy with the unmodified original software. Libscg is the oldest and best supported platform independend SCSI pass through library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101617.n1AGHCAZ031800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-10 11:17:11 EDT --- Everything looks pretty good. The Summary and Description need a bit of attention. For the summary I'd recommend something like: "An Eclipse plugin that assists with writing more unit tests" and for the description something like: "MoreUnit is an Eclipse plugin that should assist with writing more unit tests. It can decorate classes which have testcase(s) and mark methods in the editor which are under test. Renaming/moving classes/methods will cause moreUnit to rename/move the corresponding test code. Generation of test method stubs is also possible." Here's the rest of the review. Lines beginning with non-* need attention. X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - the summary line is longer but will be fixed if you change it to something similar to what I suggest above X changelog format okay - you probably want to use your actual email address :) X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. - see above ? license text included in package and marked with %doc - could we speak with upstream about getting them to include a copy of the EPL text? Not a blocker. X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/eclipse-moreunit-1.2.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm eclipse-moreunit.noarch: W: no-documentation To fix this, you could probably mark this (or both files in this directory) as %doc: eclipse-moreunit-fetched-src-V_1_2_0/org.moreunit.plugin/help/documentation.html * BuildRequires are proper * macros fine * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * md5sum matches upstream - timestamp differences exist in my generated tarball but no content differences exist * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used correctly * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on x86_64 (but is correctly noarch) * summary and description fine * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * not native, so no rpath, static linking, etc. * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel necessary * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no translations so no locale handling * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime - they won't ... * not a web app * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs - these look good to me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101623.n1AGNDjk000662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 --- Comment #16 from Denis Leroy 2009-02-10 11:23:12 EDT --- > Do not try to discuss techical stuff if you miss the needed background. > information. Please stop polluting this BZ. You also know nothing about my technical background. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:44:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101644.n1AGiae7005142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-10 11:44:35 EDT --- New version Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-moreunit.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-moreunit-1.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Everything looks pretty good. The Summary and Description need a bit of > attention. For the summary I'd recommend something like: > > "An Eclipse plugin that assists with writing more unit tests" > > and for the description something like: > > "MoreUnit is an Eclipse plugin that should assist with writing more unit tests. > It can decorate classes which have testcase(s) and mark methods in the editor > which are under test. Renaming/moving classes/methods will cause moreUnit to > rename/move the corresponding test code. Generation of test method stubs is > also possible." > > Here's the rest of the review. Lines beginning with non-* need attention. > > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - the summary line is longer but will be fixed if you change it to something > similar to what I suggest above Fixed. > > X changelog format okay > - you probably want to use your actual email address :) Fixed. > > X skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > - see above Fixed. I've used your suggestions. > > ? license text included in package and marked with %doc > - could we speak with upstream about getting them to include a copy of the > EPL text? Not a blocker. > License is correctly put in the license tag in the feature.xml, which is entirely correct for eclipse plugin. I don't think it is needed to contact upstream to make such unneeded changes. > X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output > > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/eclipse-moreunit-1.2.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm > eclipse-moreunit.noarch: W: no-documentation > > To fix this, you could probably mark this (or both files in this directory) as > %doc: > > eclipse-moreunit-fetched-src-V_1_2_0/org.moreunit.plugin/help/documentation.html > Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101648.n1AGmH5K028045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-02-10 11:48:16 EDT --- We don't need to stall this review for upstream. As long as you ask them to include the MIT license in some future release and fix the License tag in the spec file, we can proceed. I forgot to give you my suggestions for the Summary and %description, though. No offense intended, but I think the English can be improved slightly. Here's what I suggest. Summary: Use mouse gestures to control your PC %description gestikk is a Python application for nearly all netwm-conforming window managers. It recognizes predefined mouse gestures and executes defined actions in response. For example, with the gesture "down - left", you could run Firefox or simulate a window manager keyboard shortcut. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 16:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101653.n1AGrW3x006937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-10 11:53:31 EDT --- Looks good. Thanks for the changes. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101700.n1AH0k5R030706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #32 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-10 12:00:45 EDT --- Your welcome. Now, this I'm certain of, you will have to follow the procedure outlined in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101700.n1AH0wIp008643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-10 12:00:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-moreunit Short Description: An Eclipse plugin that assists with writing more unit tests Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101706.n1AH6IJX032238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #33 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-10 12:06:16 EDT --- Lemme look over things quick (looks good at first glance), and I'll do the sponsor thing. Leigh, have you a fas account created? If so, what username? If not, do so asap. :) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:15:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101715.n1AHFq3j001856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #35 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 12:15:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > > Lemme look over things quick (looks good at first glance), and I'll do the > > sponsor thing. > > > > Leigh, have you a fas account created? If so, what username? If not, do so > > asap. :) See: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account > > > Hi Rex, > > Thank you for sponsoring me, my fas username= Leigh123linux > > > Leigh Sorry I made a mistake , it should be username= leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101713.n1AHDlSk012018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #34 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 12:13:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Lemme look over things quick (looks good at first glance), and I'll do the > sponsor thing. > > Leigh, have you a fas account created? If so, what username? If not, do so > asap. :) See: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Hi Rex, Thank you for sponsoring me, my fas username= Leigh123linux Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101715.n1AHFEgL012628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-10 12:15:13 EDT --- These minor things still stand: (In reply to comment #1) > - change the Requires: on java to be >= (or maybe '='?) 1.5.0 > - I prefer to add a short name after dropins: > %files > %{eclipse_dropin} => %{eclipse_dropin}/dtp > - please add a comment above the sed line getting rid of the sun.misc.Compare > - should we add some comment(s) stating why we're only building the features we > are? This last point is important. Since we're not shipping any of the user-visible features, we need to stress this. Ideally we'd have a bug for building all of DTP and then dependent bugs for any packages we need and/or modifications we need in other packages. > X verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > - other than the java one, things look good > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - could you add some line continuations to fix this? * package successfully compiles and builds I evidently needed the rawhide SDK to build this. We'll have to do an update if we want this to be in Fedora 10, I guess. It all builds and installs (and is present after installation) fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101721.n1AHLk24003109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-10 12:21:45 EDT --- -O1 creates *.pyo such that these will be present in the package and not created on local fs when script are executed, which will cause problems when the package is updated or removed. Will fix your another recommendations. Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-argparse Short Description: Optparse inspired command line parser for Python Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101721.n1AHLD81013764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #36 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-10 12:21:12 EDT --- alrighty, looks good, sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464014] Review Request: findbugs - Find bugs in Java code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101723.n1AHNFSf003428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464014 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-02-10 12:23:14 EDT --- I made a couple of minor tweaks to deal with updated packages on F-10/Rawhide: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs/findbugs.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs/findbugs-1.3.7-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101726.n1AHQS80004056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-10 12:26:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > License should be GPL+ or Artistic fixed --> http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql_perl/perl-pgsql_perl5.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/pgsql_perl/perl-pgsql_perl5-1.9.0-2.fc10.src.rpm ---------- koji dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1117595 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101730.n1AHUSfv016100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #37 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 12:30:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > alrighty, looks good, sponsored. I believe the next step is to request a CVS module and branches with the CVSAdminProcedure, is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101736.n1AHa1oW006447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 12:35:59 EDT --- Well, - I noticed that "info mydns" does not work (it actually shows mydns(8) man page) (although info -f /usr/share/info/mydns.info.gz shows mydns info page). It seems that mydns.texi file itself needs fixing, however I won't make this bug blocked by this issue. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (mydns) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101743.n1AHhDRQ007971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 12:43:12 EDT --- Okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-simple-rss) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101750.n1AHoKWj009919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|478539 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 17:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101750.n1AHo8Y3020632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 --- Comment #5 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-10 12:50:06 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/gestikk.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/gestikk-0.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm - License fix - Summary and description update Package builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1117685 Rpmlint is silent. I've contacted upstream and asked for MIT license file in next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101800.n1AI0D1s012064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-02-10 13:00:12 EDT --- Looks good. Please consider the summary and description changes I suggested in comment #4. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101805.n1AI53Xd023756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-10 13:05:01 EDT --- Good: + Package name fits with naming guidelines + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + SPEC file is clearly written. + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains a License tag + Licese tag contains GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Could downloading tar ball from upstream with spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 492eda5e3e09beb2f6dc997ed94f5349) + Package contains no patches + Package contains not subpackages + %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate subpackage + Defintion of the BuildRoot is ok. + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Local build works fine + Koji build works fine + Package will built for noarch + File permissions seems ok. + Package doesn't contains duplicates files. + All files are own by the package + No file has a conflict to other packages + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + Package contains proper %changelog Bad: - License tag should be GPLv2 because copyright novice of the source doesn't contains late version option - Because the application needs OpenGL enable hardware acceleration a Req. opengl-games-utils is required. Addtionaly a wrapper is required. - DejaVu-Sams-fonts are required for this package - Script contains a reference to pdftk. This package is on review for rpmfusion, because there are licensing issues for the current release. - Its seems, that we will need python-opengl and python-imaging - Please add a %build stanza and a comment which explains, that no special build step is required. - Please add -p switch to the install command in the %install stanza -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101826.n1AIQiQY018083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-10 13:26:43 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I've added python BR and used summary and description you propoed in comment #4. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gestikk Short Description: Use mouse gestures to control your PC Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101835.n1AIZFK0019980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 13:35:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qbittorrent Short Description: A bittorrent Client Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC:leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] New: Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Summary: Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/vidalia-0.1.10/vidalia.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/vidalia-0.1.10/vidalia-0.1.10-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Vidalia is a cross-platform controller GUI for Tor, built using the Qt framework. Vidalia allows you to start and stop Tor, view the status of Tor at a glance, and monitor Tor's bandwidth usage. Vidalia also makes it easy to contribute to the Tor network by helping you setup a Tor server, if you wish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484932] New: Review Request: libwpg - Library for importing and converting Corel WordPerfect Graphics images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libwpg - Library for importing and converting Corel WordPerfect Graphics images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484932 Summary: Review Request: libwpg - Library for importing and converting Corel WordPerfect Graphics images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwpg-0.1.3/libwpg.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwpg-0.1.3/libwpg-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: libwpg is a library for reading and converting WPG images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] New: Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Summary: Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwps-0.1.2/libwps.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwps-0.1.2/libwps-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Library that handles Microsoft Works documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 18:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] New: Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Summary: Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/hosts3d-0.97/hosts3d.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/hosts3d-0.97/hosts3d-0.97-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Hosts3D is a 3D real-time network visualizer, displaying hosts and packet traffic. Features include support for multiple sensors, analysis of packets to gather hostnames and services, configurable layout of subnetworks, recording/replaying of packet traffic, and the ability to filter packets by host, protocol or port. hsen (Hosts3D Sensor) is a packet capture daemon which reads and sends packet header information to Hosts3D, locally or remotely. hsen also equates hostname to IP by reading DNS packets (UDP type A class IN standard query response). The relationship between hsen to Hosts3D can be one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one or many-to-many (many Hosts3Ds would be on multiple computers on the same subnet, receiving packet header information from hsen via broadcast). Info: Upstream named Homestead in Hosts3D because there is a commercial application called Homestead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101900.n1AJ0Wgi003138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-10 14:00:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) I will add this to my TODO list. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mydns Short Description: Serve DNS records directly from an SQL database Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101904.n1AJ4B4S003873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-10 14:04:10 EDT --- I've pointed out in comment 12 that it won't build on anything older than F11 Development (Rawhide). Requesting branches is pointless. Unless you get rb_libtorrent version upgrades for F-10 and F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464016] Review Request: eclipse-findbugs - Eclipse plugin for FindBugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101910.n1AJAljT027823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464016 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-02-10 14:10:46 EDT --- I have updated it: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-findbugs/eclipse-findbugs.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-findbugs/eclipse-findbugs-1.3.7-2.src.rpm The package isn't set up to make use of pdebuild possible out of the box, and I'm apparently not smart enough to figure out what to do about that, so I'm sticking with the ant build for now. Note that this package depends on the findbugs application itself (bz #464014), which depends on a library named jFormatString (bz #475603). Both of those are still awaiting review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101921.n1AJL4w5030204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 14:21:02 EDT --- *** Bug 484932 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484932] Review Request: libwpg - Library for importing and converting Corel WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101921.n1AJL3jB030159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484932 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-10 14:21:02 EDT --- This one is already in Fedora https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libwpg If you want this package for older branches, please ask the current maintainer. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 478962 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464016] Review Request: eclipse-findbugs - Eclipse plugin for FindBugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101920.n1AJK3xo007333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464016 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-10 14:20:02 EDT --- pdebuild was designed to make it easy for us to build packages where no upstream build mechanism is exposed (or easily re-usable outside of upstream's build environment). If this project provides a usable ant script that works, by all means, use it :) It's better to stick with the way upstream does it. I can review this package and I'll see what I can do about the other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101928.n1AJSrTb009086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101928.n1AJS6tv008953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101942.n1AJglPU011746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #40 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 14:42:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > I've pointed out in comment 12 that it won't build on anything older than F11 > Development (Rawhide). Requesting branches is pointless. Unless you get > rb_libtorrent version upgrades for F-10 and F-9. I am aware of the rb_libtorrent issue with F-9 & F-10, I am just running qbittorrent-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm though mock now and I will upload the spec & srpm for inspection when it's complete. qbittorrent-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm will build OK with rb_libtorrent-devel >= 0.13.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101951.n1AJpeje013744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-10 14:51:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331461) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331461) build.log of mock rebuild, on 'fedora-devel-i386' I ain't sure if my F10 compiler has anything effects on this, but mock has following compilation error: utils.cpp:95: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' (FYI, my command `mock -r fedora-devel-i386 --rebuild iptux-0.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm` which mock supposed to build for rawhide) Has this srpm built correctly on real rawhide? As devel tree will be the first cvs tree created if package review is approved, might you provide iptux-0.4.4-1.devel.src.rpm if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101953.n1AJrchA014065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-10 14:53:38 EDT --- How about getting latest working rawhide to create your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 19:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902101953.n1AJrxt4014131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #41 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-10 14:53:58 EDT --- Any particular reason why rb_libtorrent 0.14 is not being built for Fedora 10 and 9. I conducted my review on Fedora 10 after successfully building rb_libtorrent on Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 20:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102013.n1AKDXOv007856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #42 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 15:13:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > I've pointed out in comment 12 that it won't build on anything older than F11 > Development (Rawhide). Requesting branches is pointless. Unless you get > rb_libtorrent version upgrades for F-10 and F-9. I am aware of the rb_libtorrent issue with F-9 & F-10, I am just running qbittorrent-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm though mock now and I will upload the spec & srpm for inspection when it's complete. qbittorrent-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm will build OK with rb_libtorrent-devel >= 0.13.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 20:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102017.n1AKHGdY018957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #43 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 15:17:15 EDT --- Here's a F10 version that uses rb_libtorrent-devel >= 0.13.1 Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/10/qbittorrent.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/10/qbittorrent-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Patch URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/10/qbittorrent_flag.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 20:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102029.n1AKTUrA020807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-10 15:29:29 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Rpmlint output: [allisson at notebook RPMS]$ rpmlint couchdb-0.8.1-2.fc11.i386.rpm couchdb.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/couchdb couchdb couchdb.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/couchdb couchdb couchdb.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/couchdb couchdb couchdb.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/couch-0.8.1-incubating/priv/lib/couch_erl_driver.so couch_erl_driver.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 20:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102032.n1AKW5mx011275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #6 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-02-10 15:32:04 EDT --- I did that and fixed it for the ones that comes from the tarball, but didn't knew how to silence the one about the eggs, will do, tag 0.4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 21:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102120.n1ALKlQC021076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 --- Comment #7 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-02-10 16:20:47 EDT --- Here it goes, hopefully doing everything we agreed upon here: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/fedora/python-linux-procfs/python-linux-procfs.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/fedora/python-linux-procfs/python-linux-procfs-0.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 21:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:59:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102159.n1ALxSYM030691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-10 16:59:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libwpg New Branches: F-10 F-9 I need this package for F-10 so I can import it in F-9 too. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libwpg Lubomir approved me as his co. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102205.n1AM5fIb032280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:05:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:06:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102206.n1AM6Lrh008722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Armin 2009-02-10 17:06:20 EDT --- in Summary: - it's Qt, not QT. "Qt GUI front-end for tor"? in %install: replace instances of /usr/local/bin/ and /usr/local with /usr/bin (%{_bindir}) as /usr/local is not used in Fedora install -Dpm0755 %{buildroot}/usr/local/bin/%{name} \ %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} rm -rf %{buildroot}/usr/local/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102215.n1AMFSoi001885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:15:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102216.n1AMGPC2002116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:16:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102218.n1AMIi8i002470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:18:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102217.n1AMHiGa002391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:17:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484975] New: Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes Alias: perl-Scope-Upper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 Summary: Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Scope-Upper OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Scope-Upper.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Scope-Upper-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module lets you defer actions that will take place when the control flow returns into an upper scope. Currently, you can hook an upper scope end, or localize variables, array/hash values or deletions of elements in higher contexts. You can also return to an upper level and know which context was in use then. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118140 Additional Comment: This is a new requirement of Catalyst::Runtime 5.8000, aka "Catamoose" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:21:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102221.n1AMLJJM011628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:21:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102222.n1AMM5Ld011798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:22:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102226.n1AMQemk012697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:26:38 EDT --- cvs done. You may want to consider a fedorahosted space for upstream development of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102228.n1AMSqM4004434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #7 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-02-10 17:28:51 EDT --- Yeap, seems reasonable. I will fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484321] Review Request: perl-Lingua-StopWords - Stop words for several languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102228.n1AMSqH3004458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484321 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:28:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484359] Review Request: gtksourcecompletion - Completion support for GtkSourceView In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102231.n1AMVC8Z005079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484359 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:31:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102227.n1AMR3qW004260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #2 from Armin 2009-02-10 17:27:02 EDT --- oh wow, no rpmlint complaints! =) Also, the .desktop file mentions QT which you have to change to Qt. And the .desktop file does not have different translations (I'm being really picky here, but don't worry about it!). in %doc add these files as %doc in %files: HACKING CREDITS CHANGELOG LICENSE-OPENSSL README (you porbably won't need LICENSE-OPENSSL in there because that's provided by openssl, but nevertheless it's better to be there, doesn't hurt). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102228.n1AMS3oP012908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #3 from Armin 2009-02-10 17:28:02 EDT --- and in the Summary, mention tor with capital T. Qt GUI front-end for Tor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102227.n1AMRl9x012863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:27:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102233.n1AMXX2D005354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:33:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484374] Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102234.n1AMYL5v005447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:34:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102232.n1AMW5wf013756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:32:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102233.n1AMX0iv013872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:32:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102232.n1AMW9G2013796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #26 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-10 17:32:08 EDT --- Okay, So I tried to do what you proposed. I now generate cloog-ppl and cloog-ppl-devel packages from the ppl srpm. spec: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/cloog/cloog.spec.0.15-0.3.gitad322 srpm: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/cloog/cloog-0.15-0.3.gitad322.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484674] python-dns not available in EPEL4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102240.n1AMeX5r006844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484674 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:40:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102239.n1AMd7TR006364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:39:06 EDT --- cvs done. You may also want to look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102242.n1AMgBma007208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:42:09 EDT --- You still have an email address in the Owners field. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102243.n1AMh8xP015572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:43:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102244.n1AMiKVA015693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:44:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480754] Review Request: udev-extras - extra rules and tools for udev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102245.n1AMjUsS016211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480754 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:45:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102248.n1AMmEZB008121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:48:13 EDT --- Uh... this package was already in the collection. It's owned by msuchy. I have switched it back to them. Can you see if the legal concerns are answered in the already existing package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102248.n1AMmwMO008209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-10 17:48:56 EDT --- Some comments: * The original version of this "EXCEPTIONS" had a third clause: 3. Companies listed in this table are not granted rights to modify, distribute, copy or use the Program. Not under the GPL nor under any other Open Source license. This restriction includes employes, both past and present and anyone affiliated with the following Companies. +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | Company | Identified by | +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | The SCO Group | Domain Name: SCO.COM | | MySQL AB | Domain Name: MYSQL.COM | | Red Hat | Domain Name: REDHAT.COM| | Apple Computer | Domain Name: APPLE.COM | | Sun Microsystems | Domain Name: SUN.COM | | International Business Machines | Domain Name: IBM.COM | +--------------------------------------------------------------+ a) The restriction in section 3 and section 3 does not apply if the Program is part of Work by others not affected by section 3 and the Work is distributed under the GPL or under one of the licenses listed in section 2 above ***** Thankfully, that clause is no longer present. However, the EXCEPTIONS seem to not give linking permission to modified versions of their code. Accordingly, we should treat this code as GPLv3+ only, and ignore the EXCEPTIONS. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102249.n1AMnTbK016725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-10 17:49:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 22:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102257.n1AMvQN0009788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-10 17:57:26 EDT --- Suggestion: leave mention of QT out of the summary/description altogether. "Gui for tor" should be informative enough. Since you're using cmake, I'd recommend looking at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake and using the %cmake macro (and friends). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484374] Review Request: mythes-uk - Ukrainian thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102319.n1ANJW9e022756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484374 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484372] Review Request: mythes-ca - Catalan thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102328.n1ANSAis016433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484372 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484373] Review Request: mythes-es - Spanish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102328.n1ANSED8016467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484373 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102332.n1ANWfHV025723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #45 from leigh scott 2009-02-10 18:32:40 EDT --- If qbittorrent 1.2.1 is also accepted, how do I import it to CVS ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102335.n1ANZSZx026369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://lsl88.yo2.cn |http://code.google.com/p/ip | |tux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102339.n1ANd4FN018536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #4 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-02-10 18:39:03 EDT --- I have posted the new SRPM and specfile here: Spec URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-2.8.38-0.fc10/CodeAnalyst-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-2.8.38-0.fc10/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-0.fc10.src.rpm In this revision, I have made several changes to comply with the Fedora Packaging Guideline. # rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-0.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I am in the process of uploading the tarballs (CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38.tar.gz)and md5sum (CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38.md5), and licensing file onto the AMD Developer Central (as upstream code). I will notify once the action is complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 10 23:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902102338.n1ANcd2e018500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |msuchy at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-10 18:38:37 EDT --- The legal concerns are neither answered nor solved in the already existing package. I've applied the changes from my preparations to CVS now. Sorry, I somehow overlooked the package in the list. Nevertheless the review has been a success in improving quality in Fedora. And Miroslav, I'm very sorry about my mistake - luckily Kevin has corrected my wrong requests... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 00:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484476] Review Request: telepathy-farsight - Telepathy client to handle media streaming channels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110010.n1B0ARIh024292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484476 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-10 19:10:26 EDT --- Jeremy, thanks for the review. I really appreciate it. Package imported & built for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 00:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110031.n1B0VsID028202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-10 19:31:52 EDT --- Thank you Hans, for your concern. But I do have objections/corrections: (In reply to comment #2) > Orcan, I appreciate your Fedora work, and I can understand that you have issues > with a certain person. I am trying to be a productive member for our community. Having started about 4 months ago (thanks to Mamoru), I made about 10 packages here at Fedora and a few at RPMfusion. I have done more than 40 package reviews and I try to participate on certain SIGs. So, you're welcome as every other community member is. That being said, I have to make it clear that it is not me who has issues with a certain person. > But you *MUST* stop offending other Fedora contributors. > Stop writing: "please do not post in my bugs" and certainly don't accuse other > contributors of "personality issues". This is a free world, and I have all the right to make such "requests". The keyword here is "requests" which should not be confused with "orders". I did not accuse anyone with anything. Having a personality issue is not a crime. It is a psychological disorder. One can not accuse another with a disorder. I just stated a fact. > You may disagree on technical grounds > with Ralf and so do others of us from time to time. But *YOUR* behaviour here > is completely unacceptable, you need to *STOP* this immediately! > > There is a huge difference between discussing about technical issues and > sometimes being rather stubborn about them (Ralf) and between anti-social > behaviour. it is *YOU* who is way out of line here not Ralf. Am I anti-social? I am the one who is in contact with end-users. I am the one who is in contact with upstream developers. I am the one who is in contact with fellow contributors, minus those who have certain disorders. Well, if excluding a few people from my contact list to keep myself sane and productive is considered anti-socialism, then I'm anti-social. And Fedora does not exclude anti-social people like me. At least, as far as I know, there is no guideline against them. Anti-social me has had conversations with many people at #fedora-devel and learned about the enemies this disordered person made in our community. Certainly, I was not his first target. But I do hope that I will be the last. If you still think that my behavior is unacceptable, please allow me some time to consider for myself whether it is worth to try to change myself in these matters. This is what I am and what I have been. I would like to thank to everyone who have personally emailed me or messaged me by other means. I have replied to some of these messages and I will reply to the remaining ones ASAP. About the package... I don't know... I do feel discouraged... Maybe I need some more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 01:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110101.n1B11hHw000409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #16 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-10 20:01:42 EDT --- Thank you kaio. I think maybe F10 compiler brings about the building failure, but I can not sure. I think the reason is the normal compiler of F10 is gcc-4.3.2-7, I know fedora-rawhide's compiler is gcc-4.4.0. gcc-4.4.0 is developing and is not released official by FSF. There are maybe some bugs that need to be fixed. I did not try to build RPM for iptux on fedora-rawhide. Later I will installed a fedora rawhide for the test of packaging. Should I need x86_64 or i686 rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 01:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110117.n1B1H2xc011045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 --- Comment #9 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-10 20:17:00 EDT --- - Set defattr for devel package. - Convert README to UTF-8 as original is ISO-8859 and has invalid characters. Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgilib-0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 02:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110239.n1B2dF9D024347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-10 21:39:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-simple-rss Short Description: A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby Owners: stahnma kanarip Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 02:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110248.n1B2mLYs025864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-10 21:48:20 EDT --- I ain't sure if package review guidelines actually stated that you have to be buildable on rawhide. If so, I guess ix86 is alright. Honestly, even if you could get cvs tree created for rawhide (devel), koji won't be able to build it to rawhide successfully with such approved but *not buildable* srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] New: Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access libray Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access libray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 Summary: Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access libray Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tony at bakeyournoodle.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libbsr/libbsr.spec SRPM URL: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libbsr/libbsr-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a library to expose the functionality of the Barrier Synchronization Register (BSR) on IBM POWER Systems in Linux. This facility helps speed up synchronization across large SMP systems Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118653 RPMlint: [tony at mango fedora]$ rpmlint -iv RPMS/*/libbsr* SRPMS/libbsr* libbsr.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-debuginfo.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-devel.ppc64: I: checking libbsr.src: I: checking 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Emulate-Class-Acces sor-Fast OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00800-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module attempts to emulate the behavior of Class::Accessor::Fast as accurately as possible using the Moose attribute system. The public API of "Class::Accessor::Fast" is wholly supported, but the private methods are not. If you are only using the public methods (as you should) migration should be a matter of switching your "use base" line to a "with" line. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118638 Additional Comment: This is a new requirement of Catalyst::Runtime 5.8000, aka "Catamoose" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110309.n1B395ur029124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-02-10 22:09:04 EDT --- imo, leave the gcc flags alone, this is how pretty much all of kde is built in fedora already. If you have specific concerns, then we could consider those and consult upstream, but that's outside the scope of this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110350.n1B3oemZ029213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110350.n1B3oWBE005007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-10 22:50:31 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1a66166cad1278bfe89a1079e7b1bfa67ba4aebd MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast-0.00800.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, i f available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110356.n1B3uVPD030398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110356.n1B3uTfr030380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-10 22:56:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast Short Description: Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access libray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110354.n1B3sG0f029670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-10 22:54:16 EDT --- Please do not hardcode a specific sourceforge mirror in the Source0 tag. the recommended address is downloads.sourceforge.net. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment any patch should be submitted upstream for evaluation/inclusion (+ a comment with the URL of the bug report or whatever applies). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 03:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110358.n1B3wWZr006110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-10 22:58:31 EDT --- Urgh... Please filter out perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Exception) from the automatic Requires. A quick glance shows no use for them except in the tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 04:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access libray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110406.n1B46hXZ007766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #2 from Tony Breeds 2009-02-10 23:06:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please do not hardcode a specific sourceforge mirror in the Source0 tag. the > recommended address is downloads.sourceforge.net. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Ahh thank you. I have corrected the SPEC file at the same URL. > According to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > any patch should be submitted upstream for evaluation/inclusion (+ a comment > with the URL of the bug report or whatever applies). I'd updated the SPEC fil to indicate that I've asked for upstream to include the patch in the next release for this. Next I'll try and decode sourceforge to file a real bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 04:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] New: Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Summary: Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush-0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: rhnpush uploads package headers to the Red Hat Network servers into specified channels and allows for several other channel management operations relevant to controlling what packages are available per channel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 04:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110407.n1B47LVa007914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 04:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484975] Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110415.n1B4FEdr009269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-10 23:15:13 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 8f1123ed242478d667f6f0e4e8775d50810621db Scope-Upper-0.06.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: standard perl module, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] make check passes (for tests existing in Fedora) Note: I hope the dozen or so of warnings similar to Upper.c: In function 'XS_Scope__Upper_localize_delete': Upper.xs:926: warning: 'cxix' may be used uninitialized in this function Upper.xs:926: note: 'cxix' was declared here Upper.c: In function 'XS_Scope__Upper_CALLER': Upper.xs:828: warning: 'level' may be used uninitialized in this function Upper.xs:828: note: 'level' was declared here are harmless. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 04:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access libray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110438.n1B4ctns013093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-10 23:38:54 EDT --- Another small fix is needed: "warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/libbsr-0.1/examples" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 04:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110445.n1B4jjHJ006404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libbsr - |Review Request: libbsr - |Barrier Synchronization |Barrier Synchronization |Register access libray |Register access library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 05:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110501.n1B51mIO009248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-11 00:01:47 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines and Python Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines and Python Packaging Guidelines + Is 'Requires: wireless-tools' really needed? I could not locate its use in the sources, and it seems to work without it too: [rishi at freebook python-wifi-0.3.1]$ sudo rpm --nodeps -e wireless-tools [sudo] password for rishi: [rishi at freebook python-wifi-0.3.1]$ python Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jun 15 2008, 18:24:56) [GCC 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from pythonwifi.iwlibs import Wireless >>> wifi = Wireless('wlan0') >>> wifi.getEssid() 'prasannakanan' >>> Am I missing something? OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines xx - License field meets actual license + Going by the license notices in the source code: (i) examples/pyiwlist.py is under GPLv2+. (ii) examples/pyiwconfig.py, pythonwifi/iwlibs.py, pythonwifi/flags.py is under LGPLv2+. (iii) the others do not have a license notice. Although it looks like the value of the License tag should be LGPLv2+ it would be good to point out the mix-up to the upstream maintainer. OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible xx - sources match upstream sources + The Source0 URL should be http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed xx - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime + python_wifi.egg-info/SOURCES.txt contains docs/*, examples/* and tests/*. I do not know enough about Python Eggs to say whether that is a problem or not. Got to find out. OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets not needed OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 05:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110511.n1B5BvCj011262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 06:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 450050] Review Request: cgilib - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110618.n1B6I71W022900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450050 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 06:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:35:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484975] Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110635.n1B6ZBut026318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 06:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] New: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: NEXT was a good solution a few years ago, but isn't any more. It's slow, and the order in which it re-dispatches methods appears random at times. It also encourages bad programming practices, as you end up with code to redispatch methods when all you really wanted to do was run some code before or after a method fired. However, if you have a large application, then weaning yourself off 'NEXT' isn't easy.This module is intended as a drop-in replacement for NEXT, supporting the same interface, but using Class::C3 to do the hard work. You can then write new code without 'NEXT', and migrate individual source files to use 'Class::C3' or method modifiers as appropriate, at whatever pace you're comfortable with. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118777 Additional Comment: This is a new requirement of Catalyst::Runtime 5.8000, aka "Catamoose" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 06:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484975] Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110635.n1B6Z91R001952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-11 01:35:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Scope-Upper Short Description: Act on upper scopes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 06:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110642.n1B6gU8i027648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110701.n1B71mDT031278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477526] Review Request: rubygem-hpricot - A Fast, Enjoyable HTML Parser for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110711.n1B7Bail008725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477526 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-11 02:11:35 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submit push requests on bodhi for F-10/9, closing. Thank you for your review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110714.n1B7E8o8001173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 02:14:07 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118831 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 7209283a013e3358bad7dc4c3b19c109 python-linux-procfs-0.4.4.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) According to COPYING file license tag should be GPLv2+ from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses, you have included license text that matches GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110715.n1B7F0bG001293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 02:14:57 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118833 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ec20b8e1596022f8f354550147259d56 pgsql_perl5-1.9.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave nothing. + Package perl-pgsql_perl5-1.9.0-2.fc11 => Provides: Pg.so perl(Pg) = 1.9.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libpq.so.5 perl >= 0:5.003 perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110713.n1B7DZf2009004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 02:13:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1118777 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bff4d7a48dd6ee28f182c7ac2095d6d5 Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=20, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 0.29 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.40 CPU) + Package perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT-0.06-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Class::C3::Adopt::NEXT) = 0.06 Requires: perl(MRO::Compat) perl(NEXT) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(warnings::register) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110720.n1B7KZRP002715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #4 from Tony Breeds 2009-02-11 02:20:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Another small fix is needed: > "warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/libbsr-0.1/examples" Hmm okay. I can see how to fix that. I clearly need to read the rpmbuild output more clearly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 07:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110746.n1B7kEgZ007720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #30 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-11 02:46:13 EDT --- Jaroslav Just in case you missed this. Looks like Rex has given his OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 08:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110806.n1B86hhE019480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-11 03:06:42 EDT --- Now the package Provides: homestead = 0.95-1 Obsoletes: homestead < 0.95-1 but the current version in F10 is homestead-0.95-1, which won't be obsoleted. Change this to Provides: homestead = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: homestead < %{version}-%{release} or just remove the versioning from Provides & Obsoletes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 09:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110946.n1B9kdiK009538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 04:46:38 EDT --- Imported into CVS but not built yet because of dependencies on mingw32-pango, mingw32-jasper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 09:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902110946.n1B9kgqm009574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 04:46:40 EDT --- Imported into CVS but not built yet because of dependencies on mingw32-gtk2 and mingw32-gnutls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111005.n1BA505O013896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-11 05:04:59 EDT --- Quote from a testrun on F10, after I have installed like this: yum -y install --nogpgcheck ./reviewtool-0.04-1.fc10.noarch.rpm ./perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-1.fc10.noarch.rpm [root at pc64 ~]# reviewtool setup Could not load class (MooseX::App::Cmd) because : Can't locate MooseX/App/Cmd.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin/../lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line 151. at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line 133 Class::MOP::load_first_existing_class('MooseX::App::Cmd') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line 157 Class::MOP::load_class('MooseX::App::Cmd') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose.pm line 52 Moose::extends('Fedora::App::ReviewTool', 'MooseX::App::Cmd') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Exporter.pm line 201 Moose::extends('MooseX::App::Cmd') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm line 34 require Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm called at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 30 main::BEGIN() called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm line 0 eval {...} called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool.pm line 0 Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 30. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 30. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111013.n1BADWKI007862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-02-11 05:13:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331546) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331546) Just a test, please ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451582] Review Request: kvirc - themeable qt based irc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111029.n1BATE38011797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451582 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(smparrish at shallow | |creek.net) --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-11 05:29:10 EDT --- [just setting NEEDINFO so the status becomes clear in the review queue] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111027.n1BAR1sn019811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-11 05:26:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-pgsql_perl5 Short Description: Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461736] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111035.n1BAZ5bQ013678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461736 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-11 05:35:01 EDT --- *** Bug 483390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111035.n1BAZ3Zu013611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |DUPLICATE --- Comment #16 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-11 05:35:01 EDT --- Marking as DUPLICATE rather then CLOSED RAWHIDE to better track that this BZ is indeed duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 461736 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483390] Review Request: perl-Schedule-Cron-Events - Take a line from a crontab and find out when events will occur In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111049.n1BAnjuf017550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483390 --- Comment #17 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-11 05:49:43 EDT --- I contacted upstream author to clarify this doubts and if possible release new version with LICENSE file. If possible track further discussion under BZ 461736. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111054.n1BAsZ2L018716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|483205 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 10:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111054.n1BAsXDI018673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|483543 |177841 --- Comment #27 from Anithra 2009-02-11 05:54:31 EDT --- Thanks Andrew. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:02:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111102.n1BB2VKP021079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 06:02:30 EDT --- that mean spec need Requires: perl (MooseX::App::Cmd) Even after adding that command failed need Requires: perl (RPC::XML::Client) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111112.n1BBCxrc023893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 06:12:58 EDT --- you should have %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/rpmdevtools like we have in rpmdevtools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111122.n1BBMnqZ026456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-11 06:22:46 EDT --- I'd like to see some fixes prior to further reviewing. It's not trivial to review the current packaging: > BuildRequires: cmake >= 2.4 libxml2-devel >= 2.2.16 icu >= 2.6 libicu-devel It's highly recommended to put on BuildRequires per line and either sort them alphabetically or group them appropriately. icu is > 2.6 for several years. Even in RHEL 5. Please reconsider the decision to list the versions. Often packagers forget to keep them up-to-date. > sh: ruby: command not found "BuildRequires: ruby" is missing. > -- Warning: GNU Bison not available -- the parser will not be regenerated > -- Warning: GNU Flex not available -- the lexer will not be regenerated > -- PHP5 binding not generated because library and include file not installed. > -- Looking for doxygen... - NOT found Just quoted for completeness. > -- Can't build Zorba with TIDY support because TIDY is not found. "BuildRequires: libtidy-devel" makes it happy. If you don't want that, adding a comment would be good. > -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.5 > -- Could NOT find PythonLibs (missing: PYTHON_LIBRARIES PYTHON_INCLUDE_PATH) > -- Python binding not generated because library and include file not installed. "BuildRequires: python-devel" is missing. > %description devel > The %{name}-devel package contains headers for building applications > that use %{zorba}. %{zorba} is undefined. > cmake There are guidelines for proper cmake usage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake In particular, execute "make VERBOSE=1 ..." for increased verbosity in the build log. Then you will find that Fedora's global optimisation flags are not used. This needs another look after the cmake related fixes. > %files > %{_libdir}/*.so.%{version} This means that any version upgrade will break ABI compatibility with any programs linked against this library. That's an indication of an unstable API, ongoing heavy development, or developers who haven't got the versioning scheme right. > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} > %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} The %dir statement here is superfluous, because the second line already includes the %name-%version directory and all its contents recursively. You're advised to make them more explicit with a trailing slash. Like this: %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ > %files devel Here several directories are not included. In particular: %dir %{_includedir}/%{name} %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name} %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name}/util %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/simplestore %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/simplestore/msdom %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python/examples %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python/html %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby/examples %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby/html https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories You could shrink your %files list much by including entire trees recursively or by increased usage of '*' wildcards where appropriate. Else the only option is to add as many of the missing %dir statements as necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111134.n1BBYAgl004198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-11 06:34:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > xx - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime > + python_wifi.egg-info/SOURCES.txt contains docs/*, examples/* and tests/*. > I do not know enough about Python Eggs to say whether that is a problem > or not. Got to find out. According to http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EggFormats#sources-txt-source-files-manifest: "In other words, SOURCES.txt has little or no runtime value for being included in distributed eggs..." So I would say that this not a problem for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111144.n1BBiHtg031356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-11 06:44:16 EDT --- Just a comment, not a review: In your %files sections, you're advised to mark recursively included paths with a trailing slash. That makes it trivial to distinguish files and directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111154.n1BBsVo5001345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Alias| |mingw32-crossreport -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 11:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485052] New: Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/crossreport SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-crossreport-1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows CrossReport is a tool to help you analyze the APIs used by a compiled Linux program, in order to work out the effort required to cross-compile that program for Windows, using the Fedora MinGW cross-compiler. The simplest way to use it is to point it at an existing Linux binary, and then read the generated report. What it does in more detail: It looks at the libraries and API calls used by the Linux binary, and compares them to the libraries and API calls that we currently support under the Fedora MinGW cross-compiler. It then works out what is missing, and produces a report suggesting the amount of work that needs to be done to port the program. For example, whether whole libraries need to be ported first, and/or how to substitute individual calls to work on Windows. Some example reports can be found here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-February/000457.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111222.n1BCMfPX015382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-11 07:22:40 EDT --- imho a version number 1.0 is better then 1, since it's very strange looking... anyway the same apply to filesystem too:-( rpmlint mingw32-crossreport-1-1.fc10.src.rpm mingw32-crossreport.src: W: strange-permission crossreport.pl 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. mode 0755 would be better here. koji build ok: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1119335 + OK - Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [/] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [/] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %i install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [/] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. =================================================== The package mingw32-crossreport is approved by lfarkas =================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111229.n1BCTdU0009260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from leigh scott 2009-02-11 07:29:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: html2text Short Description: HTML-to-text converter Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111236.n1BCa4Xg011115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111236.n1BCaN4I018698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 07:36:23 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111236.n1BCabAh018743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 07:36:36 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111234.n1BCYqUF018055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111248.n1BCm0Ml013771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 12:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111256.n1BCugA1015759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 07:56:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - source files match different upstream url d2f1934833c247b50088fd7999efee04 DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=77, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.34 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901-1.fc11-> Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::Excel) = 0.2901 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) >= 0.1705 perl(strict) perl(vars) Suggestion: 1) fix source url to http://cpan.perl.org/authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-Format-Excel-0.2901.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111304.n1BD44tc017440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 08:04:03 EDT --- gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/vm-applet.schemas gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvirt gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/vm_applet_wrapper gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/vm_applet_wrapper gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111304.n1BD46DD025082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 08:04:05 EDT --- libvirt.src:143: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes libvir libvirt.src:160: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes libvir-devel libvirt.src:171: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes libvir-python libvirt.src:534: W: macro-in-%changelog fedora libvirt.src:719: W: macro-in-%changelog dist libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/images 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/libvirt 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/qemu 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/uml 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/lxc 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt/qemu 0700 libvirt.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libvirt-0.6.0/NEWS libvirt.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/iptables/filter 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/boot 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/network 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/libvirt/qemu 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/autostart 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/iptables/nat 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/iptables 0700 libvirt.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 libvirt.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libvir libvirt.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln libvirt.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig libvirt.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/libvirtd libvirt.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/libvirtd libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domstart.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/index.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domrestore.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domsave.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/dominfo.py libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libvir-devel libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/index.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/dominfo.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domrestore.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domsave.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domstart.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/dominfo.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/NEWS libvirt-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/libvirt.py 0644 libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domsave.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/error.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/uuid.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/basic.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domstart.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/node.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domrestore.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/create.py libvirt-python.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libvir-python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/basic.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/create.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/error.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/node.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/dominfo.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domrestore.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domsave.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/python/domstart.py /usr/bin/python libvirt-python.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-python-0.6.0/uuid.py /usr/bin/python 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 20 errors, 42 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111308.n1BD8g0Y026271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 08:08:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-crossreport Short Description: Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484735] Review Request: fipscheck - A library for integrity verification of FIPS validated modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111334.n1BDYHYl032311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484735 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 13:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484725] Review Request: eclipse-moreunit - Assisting in writing more unit tests plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111349.n1BDnXWe003768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484725 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-11 08:49:32 EDT --- Builded in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 14:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111442.n1BEgj40020480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny 2009-02-11 09:42:43 EDT --- Ping? Brennan, are you still interested in maintaining this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 14:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111446.n1BEkD2b021629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-11 09:46:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Jaroslav > > Just in case you missed this. Looks like Rex has given his OK. So then it's OK for me too. If you are willing to maintain it this patch or better should be ask upstream about flags issue. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 14:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111456.n1BEuTmr024472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #3 from Karel Zak 2009-02-11 09:56:25 EDT --- Frankly, I want to orphan this package... it means that we need upstream maintainer too. I have already asked on many places, but without any result ;-( Daniel, any idea? Maybe someone around virtualization in RH... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111504.n1BF4TiC017941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111504.n1BF44rI017846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111504.n1BF4RNr017917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-11 10:04:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT Short Description: Reduce one's dependency on NEXT Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111504.n1BF43KG017822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-11 10:04:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel Short Description: Convert between DateTime and Excel dates Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:05:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111505.n1BF5m5V018514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-11 10:05:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331571) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331571) Fix build error with g++44 (In reply to comment #14) > Created an attachment (id=331461) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331461) [details] > build.log of mock rebuild, on 'fedora-devel-i386' > > I ain't sure if my F10 compiler has anything effects on this, but mock has > following compilation error: > > utils.cpp:95: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'char*' (In reply to comment #16) > gcc-4.4.0 is developing and is not released official by FSF. There are maybe > some bugs that need to be fixed. I just watched these comments on fedora-package-review mailing list, so I have not checked the srpm of this package at all. However I guess this is a bug in source code, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg02248.html A suggestion patch attached (only tested on i386, note that I just checked if the compilation passes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111507.n1BF7jNm027644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #46 from Eric Christensen 2009-02-11 10:07:43 EDT --- SPEC: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US.spec SRPM: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/fedora-security-guide-11-en-US-1.0-12.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 15:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111540.n1BFea2e004858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #9 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-02-11 10:40:32 EDT --- Good news -- looks like there's a newer version of ElementTreePanel included in the java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo package inside /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/demo/jfc/Notepad/src.zip. According to the fedora-devel-java mailing list (same thread as before), you should just be able to delete the included version and copy this one in instead. The license will have to become something like "GPLv2+ and BSD" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469514] Review Request: debmirror - debian partial mirror script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111639.n1BGdYDP012577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #18 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-11 11:39:33 EDT --- Ping, again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111642.n1BGggQg013599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 11:42:41 EDT --- kzak: If you want, orphan this & I will take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 16:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111654.n1BGsV9f016439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #32 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-11 11:54:30 EDT --- Thanks for that... I really do not know what I need to ask regarding the patch. Regarding maintaining it, like I indicated, I am not a programmer. Will kompare handle the creation of patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111712.n1BHCSUx021230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-11 12:12:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1119899 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111712.n1BHCMTK031237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-11 12:12:21 EDT --- RPM doesn't yet pick up Moose syntax, sadly :\ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111723.n1BHNCkC002171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 12:23:11 EDT --- I've posted a patch upstream[1] which reduces the number of rpmlint problems. Now we are left with: > libvirt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/libvirt/images 0700 > (for various directories) I think rpmlint is wrong about these errors. The permissions on these directories is intended to be 0700. > libvirt.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/libvirtd Rpmlint's complaint is the logrotate file should have the same name as the package. In this case it has the same name as the daemon, which seems acceptable to me. > libvirt.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln It's a fair warning, but in this case the use of 'ln' in %post is justified. > libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/python/domstart.py > (and various other *.py files) For the examples, this seems OK, since people may wish to run the examples directly. For the python libraries, there is a mix of +x/-x permissions, and I don't know what is correct. > libvirt-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/libvirt-devel-0.6.0/examples/index.py /usr/bin/python > (etc) This seems OK to me. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-February/msg00211.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111730.n1BHUsTi004435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 12:30:52 EDT --- + rpmlint output See above. Depends on the patch being acceptable upstream. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base I changed: Requires: libvirt = %{version}-%{release} + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111739.n1BHdpsd006195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 12:39:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331595) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331595) Proposed patch to gnome-applet-vm.spec With the attached patch, we are left with this single rpmlint warning: > gnome-applet-vm.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/vm-applet.schemas I think this is one we can ignore, since this looks like the place where gconf expects these schemata to be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111751.n1BHpY1E031009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 12:51:33 EDT --- + rpmlint output See comment 5. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora "GPL+" is an acceptable license, and was set by spot, so assume this is correct. + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture + ExcludeArch bugs filed Originally had ExclusiveArch i386, x86-64, but should build everywhere so I removed this. + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun Package called ldconfig, but contains no libraries, so I removed that. + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates Originally tried to own /usr/share/pixmaps, but I fixed that. + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file I think this is not applicable because although this is a "GUI app", it is a Gnome panel plugin so doesn't need a desktop file. + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111752.n1BHqcVs031281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #331595|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 12:52:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331596) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331596) Proposed patch to gnome-applet-vm.spec Updated specfile patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 17:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111753.n1BHrvdN009083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(crobinso at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-11 12:53:56 EDT --- Cole, can you take a quick look at the proposed changes to the specfile in comment 7, and if you approve, say yea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111813.n1BIDosI014162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-11 13:13:48 EDT --- ( Sorry it may take a little more time for me to check your latest srpm. But I will review your latest srpm by Sunday ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111823.n1BINOZD016334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Adam Goode 2009-02-11 13:23:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: htmldoc New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: agoode pertusus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111822.n1BIMAUI016225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #33 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-11 13:22:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Thanks for that... > > I really do not know what I need to ask regarding the patch. Regarding > maintaining it, like I indicated, I am not a programmer. Will kompare handle > the creation of patches. Ask them to replace flags with country codes or let user choose. The patch is really easy, so you don't have to be programmer to take care about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111840.n1BIecPo009400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #34 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-11 13:40:37 EDT --- And of course I can help you as comaintainer - just add me to CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111838.n1BIcb0f008871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Bug 484598 depends on bug 484597, which changed state. Bug 484597 Summary: Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111838.n1BIcaSx008846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-11 13:38:35 EDT --- Imported, built and and pending in bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484597] Review Request: python-argparse - Optparse inspired command line parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111844.n1BIiRd0010182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484597 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-11 13:44:24 EDT --- *** Bug 462505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 18:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462505] Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111844.n1BIiQxv010156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462505 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-11 13:44:24 EDT --- Hi Ruben, sorry, I did a mistake here, I need python-argparse for grin ( #484598 ) and did a review request without searching bugzilla. Now the package is approved and imported. If you want I can transfer the package to you, if not I will maintain it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484597 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111903.n1BJ3urH014785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111903.n1BJ3ZmR025091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bos at serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111908.n1BJ8vk8016120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-02-11 14:08:56 EDT --- I tried building the above SRPM on F10 using the following packages: ghc-6.10.1-8.fc11.i386 ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-5.fc11.i386 ghc-HTTP-3001.1.5-1.fc11.i386 The build failed per the attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111909.n1BJ9btL026486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #8 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-02-11 14:09:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331608) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331608) Log of failed build attempt Failed build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111919.n1BJJA9c018483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rkhadgar at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-11 14:19:05 EDT --- It's been many months since the last comment from the submitter of this ticket; I will close this out in a week if progress isn't made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111937.n1BJbFr7022760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 Summary|Clanship 1.0.5f rpm |Review Request: clanship - | |Battleship clone --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-11 14:37:14 EDT --- I believe "Battleship" is a registered mark belonging to Hasbro. TESS shows several marks; I am not really sure if any of them relate to generic, unstylized usage involving board games, since the game has existed long before it was published in any commercial form. Blocking FE-Legal for an opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111938.n1BJcwCs000698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #35 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-11 14:38:57 EDT --- OK. What I'm going to ask is that the developer add a flag for cmake so that a package maintainer can throw the --without-countryflags. equivalent in cmake. Do you concur? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111944.n1BJiHhL001724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-11 14:44:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-translatoid Short Description: Translator plasmoid using Google Translator Owners: eliwap jreznik Branches: f-9 f-10 InitialCC: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111949.n1BJnTMF002956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Cole Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(crobinso at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Cole Robinson 2009-02-11 14:49:27 EDT --- All the changes look good. What is the remaining process here? Do I need to apply the patch for all supported branches or is rawhide sufficient? Can the bug be closed after the patch is applied? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 19:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902111953.n1BJrZPf026409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #19 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-11 14:53:33 EDT --- Thank you Mamoru Tasaka Kaio and Mamoru Tasaka I have built a SPRM with iptux-0.4.4-g++44.patch. Here is the URL: SPEC file:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux.spec SRPM?http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.4-2.fc10.src.rpm To Mamoru Tasaka May I add your e-mail address into CC list? If you don't want, I will remove your e-mail address in CC list. Could you do the primary review for me? I hope iptux can be put into Fedora repository to help more people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 20:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462505] Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112051.n1BKpfTh008164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462505 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-02-11 15:51:40 EDT --- Hi Terje, No problem, you can keep it ;-) I needed it for allmydata-tahoe, but it's one of the many dependencies needed, so thanks for getting this one in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 20:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112047.n1BKlU2j006978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-11 15:47:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-dtp-1.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > A few minor things: > > - please set the fedora-review flag to ? > - change the Requires: on java to be >= (or maybe '='?) 1.5.0 Fixed. > - I prefer to add a short name after dropins: > %files > %{eclipse_dropin} => %{eclipse_dropin}/dtp Fixed. > - please add a comment above the sed line getting rid of the sun.misc.Compare Fixed. > - should we add some comment(s) stating why we're only building the features we > are? Fixed. > > And the rest of the review (lines beginning with X need attention; those > beginning with * are okay): > > X verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > - other than the java one, things look good Fixed. > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - could you add some line continuations to fix this? Fixed wherever possible some paths are just too long. > X package successfully compiles and builds > - is this expected? > > [javac] 4. ERROR in > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/dtp-1.6.1/build/plugins/org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.oda.design/src/org/eclipse/datatools/connectivity/oda/design/impl/InputElementUIHintsImpl.java > [javac] (at line 112) > [javac] assert (eContainer() instanceof InputElementAttributes); > [javac] ^^^^^^ > [javac] The method assert(boolean) is undefined for the type > InputElementUIHintsImpl > Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 20:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112054.n1BKsewv017994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #10 from Jon Levell 2009-02-11 15:54:38 EDT --- Another update: Spec URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse.spec SRPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10.src.rpm RPM URL: http://coralbark.net/fedora/diffuse/diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10.noarch.rpm I've addressed the points from comment #9. I can see that I was very naive when I initially submitted the spec file on the grounds that it seemed to work fine on the systems I installed it on. Thanks Michael (and everyone else) for the helpful comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112110.n1BLAKZX012470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-11 16:10:19 EDT --- Ok, some feedback (awesome work BTW) 1. minor: since consensus seems to be that multiple directory ownership is ok in some conditions, %_font_pkg now does it automatically, so you don't need the %dir %{_fontdir} in common anymore (though it's probably harmless). Will need to update the wiki templates to reflect this 2. it does not build in mock, but does build in koji, so your package is probably fine and that's a mock bug (bug #485146) 3. major: the font files declare font family names like "BPG Courier S GPL&GNU". Since fontconfig works with whatever the font files declare, you need to use those names in your fontconfig files in you want them to work (how to pass the & safely is an interesting problem to discuss with Behdad) 4. I'd have used a fontconfig priority of 63-64 to make sure the latin glyphs in those fonts do not override the ones in more mainstream fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112120.n1BLKIAS014883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-11 16:20:17 EDT --- I think, you should wrote Provides: homestead = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: homestead < 0.95-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112129.n1BLTVYW025627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-11 16:29:30 EDT --- - Provides: homestead = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: homestead < 0.95-1 - Perhaps THIS way?! This looks correct and make sense (to me)! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112141.n1BLffIg028594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112141.n1BLfMJZ028552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-11 16:41:20 EDT --- Review will be done tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112145.n1BLjJsP029652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-11 16:45:18 EDT --- 1. This bit is not strictly necessary # Repeat for every font family -- Sans Mono 2. This one isn't either now that multiple ownership of font dirs was approved; %_font_pkg will now auto-own this dir %dir %{_fontdir} 3. having upstream publish an official sfd version and build from it would be preferred (not a blocker) 4. You need to add a Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release} to the main package or it won't pull common in (and it's necessary for fontconfig-filesystem) The last one is the only real problem and it's a minor one ??? APPROVED ??? Please do not forget to fix those little problems, and continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 21:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485154] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd/perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MooseX::Role::Cmd is a Moose role intended to ease the task of building command-line wrapper modules. It automatically maps Moose objects into command strings which are passed to IPC::Cmd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 22:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112210.n1BMAk7n002907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-11 17:10:44 EDT --- Thanks for the updates. The only thing I'd like to see is a comment at the beginning of the specfile stating which features we're building and which ones we're not and reasons for that. Please add that, but since it's not a huge issue, I'll approve this now. I've started a wiki page that we can use to track features/plugins we'd like and their dependencies. We can add bug links to the wiki page as we file bugs. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse#Plug-ins_We.27d_Like_To_Ship -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 22:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] New: Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Summary: Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki.spec SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki-0.9.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Anki is a program designed to help you remember facts (such as words and phrases in a foreign language) as easily, quickly and efficiently as possible. Anki is based on a theory called spaced repetition. This is my first package and so I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 22:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112254.n1BMsKdG001778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 22:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112257.n1BMvXF7011760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #5 from Tony Breeds 2009-02-11 17:57:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hmm okay. I can see how to fix that. I clearly need to read the rpmbuild > output more clearly. Fixed, new scratch build here: https://koji.fedoraproject.or/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120493 new SRPM and SPEC file at: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libbsr/ rpmlint is still clear: [tony at mango fedora]$ rpmlint -vi SRPMS/libbsr*3.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/ppc64/libbsr*3.fc10.ppc64.rpm SPECS/libbsr.spec libbsr.src: I: checking libbsr.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-debuginfo.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-devel.ppc64: I: checking 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 11 23:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902112337.n1BNbwwQ010622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-11 18:37:56 EDT --- Orcan, it would be useful, if you would accept input from packagers, even if you don't like them e.g. on personal base or caused by their input. From my point of view of being a provenpackager (ueberpackager), comment #2 is is useful and should be followed (the Epoch thing can be discussed maybe). With respect to all what happened unil now: Valid input needs to be taken, handled and/or discussed. If such things are refused without a valid reason, rejecting a package review request seems to be pretty okay for me. Packaging is not that easy as it maybe seems or some people want to have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 00:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485164] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485164 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianburrell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-XML-Generator.spec SRPM URL: http://znark.com/fedora/perl-XML-Generator-1.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Perl module for generating XML by calling methods named for each XML tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 00:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120055.n1C0tK05001272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Ian Burrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ian Burrell 2009-02-11 19:55:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-KinoSearch Short Description: Search engine library Owners: iburrell Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 01:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120139.n1C1dWg4031975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cabal-install Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-11 20:39:31 EDT --- The .spec file in comment 6 does not use %cabal_build: you trying another older package perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 01:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120150.n1C1oLKb010670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 01:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120154.n1C1sPo5001896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-11 20:54:24 EDT --- Package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 01:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120155.n1C1t1Ra011116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mike at flyn.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 01:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120157.n1C1vaG1011805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 --- Comment #4 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-02-11 20:57:35 EDT --- > rpmlint asterisk-sounds-core.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120208.n1C28khY004701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-11 21:08:45 EDT --- Dear Robert, I would like you to analyze the progression of this situation rather than looking at it as a whole. Please go ahead and have a look at my SPEC file, and comment #1. I properly stated why I used Epoch:1 and AutoReqProv:no. I accept that I may have made a wrong choice to handle them. Then, please read comment #2. I do NOT consider it useful to explain what I did wrong. Saying "this and this is not useful" and disregarding my comments about both issues do not help me correct myself. If you want a useful comment, have a look at comment #11 and bug #484591's comment #3. Then, please read my answer, comment #3 on this bug. Do you think that I am "refusing things without a valid reason"? Again, please read comment #3 once more and explain me how you arrive at this conclusion. This is the point where the disordered person closed my bug. Once, I nicely told this person to not follow me around and post on my bugs. He does nothing but gets in my nerves. If you want to know where this happened, please have a look at this link (comments #2 and #3): https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195 Otherwise, please proceed to the next paragraph. I apologize to bring over a conversation that has nothing to do with Fedora, to Fedora. Now, knowing that I do NOT want him around me (since the information he provides has been wrong in certain cases if you saw that in the above link, plus his repulsive attitude that has been confirmed by many people in Fedora, is offensive), he picks my bug among 750+ other open review requests and posts here. This has no other purpose than blowing my fuse. I'm cutting this here. If majority of our community thinks that my behavior is unacceptable while his is appropriate (including closing my bug), then perhaps Fedora is not the place where I belong. Regards, Orcan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120214.n1C2E74V014819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianburrell at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 21:14:05 EDT --- *** Bug 485164 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485164] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - Perl module for generating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120214.n1C2E68C014787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485164 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-11 21:14:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 482965 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120219.n1C2J2M7006495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #9 from Bernard Johnson 2009-02-11 21:19:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Accordingly, we should treat this code as GPLv3+ only, and ignore the > EXCEPTIONS. Should the EXCEPTIONS file be left in the %doc section or left out completely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120226.n1C2QM3I007988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-02-11 21:26:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Generator Short Description: perl module for generating XML documents Owners: ausil Branches: EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120226.n1C2QeaU017223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-02-11 21:26:39 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 02:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120249.n1C2n2SF011749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #6 from Tony Breeds 2009-02-11 21:49:01 EDT --- Upstream have released v0.2 including the patch from the RPM. I've respun with 0.2 New scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120621 new SRPM and SPEC file at: http://bakeyournoodle.com/~tony/fedora/libbsr/ rpmlint is still clear: [tony at mango fedora]$ rpmlint -vi SRPMS/libbsr*0.2*rpm RPMS/ppc64/libbsr*0.2*rpm SPECS/libbsr.spec libbsr.src: I: checking libbsr.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-debuginfo.ppc64: I: checking libbsr-devel.ppc64: I: checking 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 03:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445261] Review Request: icelandic-fonts - Icelandic Magical Staves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120349.n1C3nhx0023621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445261 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-11 22:49:41 EDT --- This has been in for a long time, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 03:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455153] Review Request: asana-math-fonts - An OpenType font with a MATH table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120351.n1C3pDft000744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455153 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-11 22:51:09 EDT --- This has been in for a long time, closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 03:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120358.n1C3wfxE001945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-11 22:58:40 EDT --- looks good to me now, APPROVED. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 05:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485178] New: Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485178 Summary: Review Request: ruby-dbus -- Ruby D-Bus client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ruby-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ruby-dbus-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ruby DBUS communication client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 06:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120656.n1C6u9bC023402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-02-12 01:56:07 EDT --- Here's my review. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. srpm is clean, binary rpm reports these: cabal-install.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/cabal cabal-install.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/cabal These are both acceptable. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [...] BSD3 == OK. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match [...] OK. # MUST: license(s) in %doc. OK. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream [...] OK. # MUST: successfully compile and build [...] OK. # MUST: architectures in ExcludeArch. OK. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [...] OK. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK. # MUST: shared library ldconfig NA. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable [...] NA. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK. # MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [...] OK. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NA. # MUST: %doc must not affect runtime OK. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Exempt. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files [...] NA. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix [...] NA. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages [...] NA. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [...] NA. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications [...] NA. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned [...] NA. # MUST: %install rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. # SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text [...] NA. # SHOULD: description and summary translations No. # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK. # SHOULD: binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested x86_64 and i386. # SHOULD: functions as described OK. # SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK. # SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel [...] NA. # SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files [...] NA. # SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of [...] This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 07:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:04:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120704.n1C74LTT024656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-12 02:04:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-dtp Short Description: Eclipse Data Tools Platform Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 07:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] New: Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries Alias: perl-MouseX-Types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Summary: Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MouseX-Types OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MouseX-Types.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MouseX-Types-0.01-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: Organize your Mouse types; much as MooseX::Types does for your Moose types. For more information, please see the MooseX::Types manpage. This library was split off from Mouse as of Mouse 0.15. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120938 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 07:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120740.n1C7eAG3031530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 --- Comment #10 from Dan Hor?k 2009-02-12 02:40:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > All the changes look good. > > What is the remaining process here? Do I need to apply the patch for all only in rawhide > supported branches or is rawhide sufficient? Can the bug be closed after the > patch is applied? depends on who is the owner and who is the reviewer, after reviewer will say "APPROVED" then the owner can close -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 07:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120743.n1C7hSP8009160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 07:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120747.n1C7leRM032757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 07:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120758.n1C7wo5A002076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-12 02:58:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331664) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331664) Review Initial review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:00:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120800.n1C80uYR002802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-12 03:00:55 EDT --- I won't go into that more. You know my points and for the rest I mostly agree with Hans until now (especially when looking to bug #484591). From the technical point, Ralf pointed same things out as Hans did (ignoring epoch difference). Hans used a few more words, but nothing else. Finally, no need for me and you to tell things twice, my thinking is very closed to Hans' ones until now. Possibilities to filter out unwanted dependencies by not using AutoReqProv: are on the Fedora wiki for a long time now. Ever consumed that Guideline before this bug report? Seemingly not and yes, you were not pointed to it in this bug report. But a thing which could get improved on both sides... Ralf is maybe not liked that much by multiple/several persons or whatelse, but I'm pretty sure, if you would asked him nicely, would have provided you a patch solving the 64 bit things (even if i's just debug stuff) which you could send to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120805.n1C859so013165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 --- Comment #25 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-12 03:05:04 EDT --- Erm, can we close this? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120830.n1C8UUfL007925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-12 03:30:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120998 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. perl-MouseX-Types.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.01-1 ['0.01-0.fc11', '0.01-0'] == >easy to fix at cvs import. + source files match upstream url 8c375c45aa73397c40ac58054d3ca734 MouseX-Types-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=48, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.02 sys + 0.23 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.29 CPU) + Package perl-MouseX-Types-0.01-0.fc11 => Provides: perl(MouseX::Types) = 0.01 perl(MouseX::Types::Base) perl(MouseX::Types::Mouse) perl(MouseX::Types::TypeDecorator) Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Mouse::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MouseX::Types) perl(MouseX::Types::TypeDecorator) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Fix Release tag in spec APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120836.n1C8ahuQ018950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120836.n1C8afev018927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-12 03:36:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MouseX-Types Short Description: Organize your Mouse types in libraries Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120834.n1C8Y1YK018244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-12 03:34:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-Debug Short Description: Perl debug output package Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 08:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120837.n1C8bZ98019103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-12 03:37:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120997 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9bcd44e502c16e0cab226d26510bba6d MooseX-Role-Cmd-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=21, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 2.07 cusr 0.14 csys = 2.25 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd-0.04-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(MooseX::Role::Cmd) = 0.04 perl(MooseX::Role::Cmd::Meta::Attribute::Trait) Requires: perl(IPC::Cmd) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 09:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120908.n1C98hB5015738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 474985, which changed state. Bug 474985 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-compress - API for working with tar, zip and bzip2 files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474985 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 472144 depends on bug 475019, which changed state. Bug 475019 Summary: Review Request: opencsv - A very simple csv (comma-separated values) parser library for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475019 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #15 from Sandro Mathys 2009-02-12 04:08:41 EDT --- Fred says he updated the files in their CVS but is having problems getting the maven build to work. He'll maybe drop back to the old ant script. We're currently using ant in the skinlf pkg and neither of both in l2fprod-common anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 09:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902120943.n1C9hBBD000601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-12 04:43:10 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f11 / i386, x86_64 Build failure on: ppc, ppc64, see summary [!] Rpmlint output: not clean - libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeee.so.2.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 - libapogee.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libapogeeu.so.2.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 [-] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ - SPEC file contains GPL+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji. - koji dist-f11 [!] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - package does not build on PPC, PPC64 Building CXX object CMakeFiles/apogeeu.dir/ApnCamera_Linux.o error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === SUMMARY === - Ask upstream to fix rpmlint output - Fix license - Package should compile and build on PPC, PPC64! * If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 10:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121021.n1CALswv009258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-12 05:21:52 EDT --- Well, I don't understand Tom's comment about an old version of the EXCEPTIONS file. None of the tarballs in this review contained that old version of the file. That comment is only of limited historical value. Further, where do the EXCEPTIONS forbid linking with a modified libzdb? Section 1.a requires the licensee to ''obey the GPL in all respects for "the Program" (= libzdb)''. Originally, I only reviewed the EXCEPTIONS file to see whether it adds anything that doesn't leave us a choice, but it's only a multi-licensing model with multiple options to choose from. We can pick the GPLv3+ as the only license for the Fedora package. We cannot use the EXCEPTIONS, because IMO they violate the GPLv3. Confirmation for that would have been helpful. Hence keeping the EXCEPTIONS file would be misleading, since we would offer dual/multi-licensing like the tarball. Deleting the file would require patching the README (and any other files that mention the EXCEPTIONS file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 10:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121036.n1CAaMdI012212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-12 05:36:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd Short Description: Wrap system command binaries the Moose way Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 10:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121052.n1CAq56F015861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-12 05:52:04 EDT --- 1)Avoid use of hash in spec file it looks complicated to me. 2)desktop file should be installed using desktop-file-install command remove desktop-file-validate command lines in SPEC 3) .so files must go to separate -devel subpackage. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Devel_Packages 4) buildroot value not as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag 5) any reason to change tarball name from CodeAnalyst to CodeAnalyst-gui? 6)You need to use any value from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS %{optflags} not both see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS 7) When I fix above problems locally on my machine and built rpm, I used rpmlint on binary package where I see some messages related to init script reported as rpmlint -iv /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-0.fc10.i386.rpm CodeAnalyst-gui.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/codeanalyst_init ===>The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. CodeAnalyst-gui.i386: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/codeanalyst_init ===>While your daemon is running, you have to put a lock file in /var/lock/subsys/. To see an example, look at this directory on your machine and examine the corresponding init scripts. CodeAnalyst-gui.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name codeanalyst_init ==>The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. 8)Every time you change in SPEC update Release to next number e.g. now you should change it to 1. Add changelog what you changed in SPEC for this -1 release Then submit this new package for further review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 11:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485206] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat/perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat/perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Under older perls this module provides a drop in compatible api to Hash::Util::FieldHash using perltie. When Hash::Util::FieldHash is available it will use that instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485207] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Assert/perl-Test-Assert.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Assert/perl-Test-Assert-0.0501-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class provides a set of assertion methods useful for writing tests. The API is based on JUnit4 and Test::Unit and the methods die on failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121222.n1CCMOpv003670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-12 07:22:23 EDT --- The new guideline about comments on patches is a "SHOULD" item and not a MUST. Even the SourceForge URLs are not mandatory. No reason to insist on getting them fixed prior to approval. It's not as if the url pointed to the interactive web page. Direct links to a mirror are just fine, since the various wget/curl compatible mirror-selection or round-robin dns urls don't always work for everyone either (and a reviewer ought to visit the upstream site anyway). Additionally, some SF.net projects publish their tarballs with different urls. The guidelines don't cover all cases, as they are more of a hint/recommendation than a strict rule. The redundant %dir didn't cause any files to be mispackaged and didn't cause a build failure either. [...] The packaging is fine: APPROVED [...] Hints and minor issues that can be changed in pkg cvs: * For %setup the "-n %name-%version" parameter is the default. * You mix %_libdir and %_prefix/%_lib in %install section. * Instead of | %dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ | %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LGPL-2.1 | %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README you could also use: | %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ | %exclude %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/examples/ Doesn't change much for this package, but could be helpful with other packages where more than two doc files shall be included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121241.n1CCfND7029248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225811] Merge Review: gnome-applet-vm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121241.n1CCfB8g007515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225811 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-12 07:41:09 EDT --- OK I've applied the patch in comment 7. ---------------------------------- This package is APPROVED by rjones ---------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226055] Merge Review: libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121237.n1CCbeRu006636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226055 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-12 07:37:37 EDT --- I have agreed changes with upstream and added the patch to Rawhide. ---------------------------------- This package is APPROVED by rjones ---------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:41:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:41:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485206] Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121241.n1CCfacM007604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121243.n1CChmg7007974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-12 07:43:47 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles: A Fedora package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121245.n1CCjU0r008601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-12 07:45:29 EDT --- Blockers: > mv %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}-0.1/%{name}/* %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}/ > rm -rf %{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name}-0.1/ Not only should something like this be explained with a comment in the spec file. Why is the default install location changed? Did you notice that this breaks the pkgconfig files? > make install -p DESTDIR=%{buildroot} This is not what you want. This is make --print-data-base ...! Most likely you wanted: make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" Have you looked into adding a %check section for "make check"? $ rpmls -p /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/libwps-doc-0.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2/CHANGES -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2/COPYING -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2/CREDITS -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2/HACKING -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2/README These are only files, and they are also found in the main package. I see you want to install doxygen docs, but here it didn't work out. The %files section for the -doc subpackage is wrong, too, because %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ is the default location for all files in %doc lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 12:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121252.n1CCqpmp009980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-12 07:52:50 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive-0.10.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Notes: - Pdftk is optional. See: http://impressive.sourceforge.net/manual.php#req -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485206] Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121305.n1CD5lbt012845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-12 08:05:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1121479 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7f5c4a37f1e3d9eb9530597fca299825 Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is NOT present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=27, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.03 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.04 CPU) + Package perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat-0.03-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(Hash::Util::FieldHash::Compat) perl(Hash::Util::FieldHash::Compat::Destroyer) perl(Hash::Util::FieldHash::Compat::Tie::FieldHash) perl(Hash::Util::FieldHash::Compat::Tie::IdHash) Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Tie::Hash) perl(Tie::RefHash::Weak) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121302.n1CD2dPa012014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-12 08:02:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1121482 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f14e7aafc0940cc6d02ead992d92d823 Test-Assert-0.0501.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=41, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.50 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.60 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Assert-0.0501-1.fc11 -> Provides: perl(Exception::Assertion) = 0.05 perl(Test::Assert) = 0.05 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Exception::Base) perl(Exception::Base) >= 0.21 perl(Exporter) perl(constant) perl(constant::boolean) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1)Make sure to filter one of the following Requires: perl(Exception::Base) perl(Exception::Base) >= 0.21 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121310.n1CDAWKF003076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-12 08:10:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Assert Short Description: Assertion methods for those who like JUnit Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121307.n1CD7TO2002386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-12 08:07:29 EDT --- And that really refers only to the rpmbuild "warning: File listed twice ..."? I have doubts about that (and I've done packaging guidelines stuff long enough). Let me explain: 1.) That guideline would only be somewhat important for actual files (and not directories). The rationale is simple: By mistake one can include a file more than once in the same %files section (which does not do any harm!) and not notice this when moving the file to the %files section of another subpackage. Then you end up with the same file in multiple packages. That's bad, as it can cause side-effects. 2.) That guideline would be more important if it referred to files listed in multiple subpackages. Because that is something rpmbuild does NOT detect. So, once again, consider it a hint/documentation on what packagers might want to know about when creating packages. Still no reason to require a package submitter to spend extra time on building fresh rpms just for this. Here it was a simple redundant %dir entry. It can be pointed out and fixed in cvs. It's not a blocker-criterion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485206] Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121309.n1CD9Taj013338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-12 08:09:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat Short Description: Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121314.n1CDE1QZ003825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-12 08:13:59 EDT --- This package suffers from a larger number of clashes with perl-Test-Unit: (In reply to comment #2) > > + Package perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101-1.fc11 => > Provides: perl(Test::Unit::Debug) perl(Test::Unit::HarnessUnit) > perl(Test::Unit::Lite) = 0.11 perl(Test::Unit::Lite::AllTests) > perl(Test::Unit::Result) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) > perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite) # rpm -ql --provides perl-Test-Unit .. perl(Test::Unit::Result) .. perl(Test::Unit::Runner) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) .. perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite) I'd suggest to filter these out of perl-Test-Unit-Lite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 13:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121312.n1CDCUli014400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #10 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-02-12 08:12:24 EDT --- I have a spec file that I use locally (we are an HEP group) but it's by no means ready to be included in fedora. >From what I remember some of the problems are: * The M$ fonts have to go, we need to find suitable replacements and patch the code * Licesing could be an issue with other parts of root beyond the fonts, getting some advice from the legal team is probably a good idea * Some libraries are unversioned (xrootd, proofd. If I remember correctly) * Most of the servers use no authentication in their default setup so the configs need to be changed to default to some "strong" authentication, people shouldn't end up exporting their homes without authentication just because they started a service. * I've been packaging cint (the c++ interpreter) on it's own subpackage since it can be usefull outside of root, the latest version of root doesn't build the binary anymore though and it looks like upstream is starting to use cint on it's own (http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint). It might be worthwhile to check if root can use the "external" cint to avoid code duplication. * find a solution for libafterimage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 14:20:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226348] Merge Review: python-virtinst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121420.n1CEK8wj019143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226348 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |markmc at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-12 09:20:06 EDT --- closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 15:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121515.n1CFFoMS031804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-12 10:15:49 EDT --- Okay, good. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (kguitar) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 15:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121518.n1CFIFHI032425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 10:18:12 EDT --- Well, the EXCEPTIONS does not violate the GPLv3. It grants additional rights, not restrictions. It is clearly derived from the MySQL linking exception, but, it is not identical. The MySQL exception says: "A FOSS application developer ("you" or "your") may distribute a Derivative Work provided that you and the Derivative Work meet all of the following conditions:" The libzdb EXCEPTIONS says: "You are free to distribute the Program and link the Program with Work licensed under one or more of the Open Source licenses listed below in section 2, as long as:" The wording here is precise, the GPLv3 defines the term "the Program" as: "?The Program? refers to any copyrightable work licensed under this License. Each licensee is addressed as ?you?." This is different from a derived, or modified work, which is given a separate definition in the GPLv3: "To ?modify? a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an exact copy. The resulting work is called a ?modified version? of the earlier work or a work ?based on? the earlier work." So, since EXCEPTIONS explicitly grants linking exceptions to "The Program", but not to "modified versions", it only applies to an unmodified libzdb. Since we are making modifications (and even if we were not, because we would want the right to do so), we cannot leverage the EXCEPTIONS. However, we are not required to do so (which is why it doesn't violate the GPLv3), so we choose not to. The historical reference is made to show that the upstream's intent in with EXCEPTIONS shows a reasonably malicious history. Accordingly, where we might assume ignorance in the choice of wording in the EXCEPTIONS text in a similar scenario, we can not in this specific case. I would advise that we not package the EXCEPTIONS file, as it is of little value to anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 15:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121518.n1CFIGWs011835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-02-12 10:18:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts Short Description: A sans-serif font for use as primary interface font Owners: palango Branches: devel only InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 15:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121532.n1CFWuoo015269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-12 10:32:55 EDT --- Ralf, Please help me to understand how to avoid such clashes in future perl package reviews? I think I just looked into code and see what META.yml said as provides. Also, I successfully installed this package using rpm command where I have already installed perl-Test-Unit. Did I miss anything in this review for such clash? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121608.n1CG8MkX024047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-12 11:08:21 EDT --- Quote: the GNU General Public Licensed Zild Database Library (the `Program') This is how the file EXCEPTIONS uses the term "the Program". The GPL allows modifying the Program. That's a non-issue even when applying the exceptions. Quote: You obey the GPL in all respects for the Program and the Work > Well, the EXCEPTIONS does not violate the GPLv3. It grants additional > rights, not restrictions. 1 b.ii is an added restriction. It takes away freedom. It overrules the licence used for "the Work" when linking with "the Program". Even copyright holders of libzdb cannot do that. For example: Assume I link (L)GPLv2 licensed Work with libzdb + EXCEPTIONS, then 1 b.ii requires me to do more than what would be necessary with just the (L)GPLv2. I stick to my earlier POV, choosing "GPLv3+ only" is okay as one of the multiple licencing options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121613.n1CGDwmq025242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 11:13:57 EDT --- Well, then while we disagree on our interpretations, we draw the same conclusion, so I see no real problem here. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121620.n1CGKT1B026951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #6 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-02-12 11:20:28 EDT --- Responding to Comment #5: 1) ### which were used to partition b/w different group of macro is now removed. 2) desktop-file-validate command has been removed 3) CodeAnalyst needs these .so files for running. However, I will add the version for these shared library and clean up the installation. 4) The buildroot value is now fixed. 5) Generally, CodeAnalyst package (upstream) distributes not only the GUI, but also the modified-oprofile commandline tools and oprofile daemon. Since the package here distributes only the GUI, the name is changed to communicate the difference. 6) We will be using only $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. 7) I will get back with the fix detail. 8) Bump the version due to changes in the CodeAnalyst and not just the packaging related changes. From now on, I will keep the version number fixed until next version changes. Thank you for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121633.n1CGX5KU029663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-12 11:33:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Please help me to understand how to avoid such clashes in future perl > package reviews? These are hard to catch. The only semi-systematic approach I am aware about is to iterate through repoquery --whatprovides 'perl(..)' on all provides a perl package provides. I only caught these in this particular case, because another package BR'ed: perl(Test::Unit::TestCase), which resulted into this: # repoquery --whatprovides 'perl(Test::Unit::TestCase)' perl-Test-Unit-0:0.25-4.fc9.noarch perl-Test-Unit-0:0.25-4.fc9.noarch perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0:0.1101-1.fc10.noarch > I think I just looked into code and see what META.yml said as > provides. Also, I successfully installed this package using rpm command where I > have already installed perl-Test-Unit. Right, I am also observing this, but ... what is BR: perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) supposed to do? IMO, to pull-in the actual perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) module, i.e. the version from perl-Test-Unit, not the "lite" version from perl-Test-Unit-Lite. I fear, we are facing the tip of an iceberg of hidden issues. > Did I miss anything in this review for > such clash? Strictly speaking, yes - but we all are humans :-) I likely also would not have caught this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121638.n1CGcIJ0018908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-12 11:38:17 EDT --- Good: + Base name of the SPEC file metches with package name. + Package name fullfill the naming guidelines + Package contains current release of the application + Could download sources from upstream + Packaged souces metches with upstream one. (md5sum: 260c55fe010520cbe894c97b224f996b) + Package contains valid license tag + License tag contains GPLv2+ as an valid OSS license + License on the license tag fit with copyright note of the included source files + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Proper use of the %{?dist] tag + Proper defintion of the Buildroot + Buildroot will been cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Consistently rpm macro usage + Package use parallel build + Local build works fine. + Koji build works fine. + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm + Rpmlint is quite on binary rpm + Rpmlint is quite on debuginfo package + Files hat proper files permissions + %files stanza has no duplicated entries + All packaged files are owned by the package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no deparate subpackage + package contains desktop entry file. + Proper %changelog Bad: - Please change Provides of the main package and the subpackage as discussed in comment #3 - Package doesn't honor $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Please remove the -p switch on make install - Debuginfo package contains no sources Question: * Does the sampler subpackage not requires the main subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:48:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121648.n1CGmTER000379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-02-12 11:48:28 EDT --- > - [ BAD ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Python says there has not > yet been a release. The Version should be 0 and Release should follow > the pre-release guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages However, a version is given with the package, and this version is used in the Python egg distributed with the package. http://code.google.com/p/pyfacebook/source/browse/trunk/setup.py#6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 16:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121659.n1CGxoA6002740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-12 11:59:48 EDT --- Hi, Please take a look in this scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1122217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 17:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121700.n1CH0nGm003330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 17:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121703.n1CH3VpM003835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-12 12:03:30 EDT --- Good: + License tag contains the correct entry GPLv2 + Package contains empty %build stanza with comment Bad. - You should a deja-sans-fonts as a Req.(Please koop in mind, that the packagename was change from F-10 to F-11) - I see no effort to create a wrapper script using the opengl-wrapper script.Please us something like this: #!/bin/bash . /usr/share/opengl-games-utils/opengl-game-functions.sh GAME=`basename $0 | sed 's/-wrapper.*//'` checkDriOK $GAME exec $GAME "$@" as an template for your own efforts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121814.n1CIEa4v018784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Anithra 2009-02-12 13:14:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-systemtapgui Short Description: GUI interface for SystemTap Owners: anithra Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121821.n1CILe0Q009769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:21:38 EDT --- Indeed. This not MIT but a poorly worded custom license with a clear commercial use restriction. Closing this out as CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121824.n1CIO3kK010346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-12 13:24:02 EDT --- Robert, I hope you have some time for this soon so I can go on with subclipse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121825.n1CIPVB5010773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:25:30 EDT --- I'm fine with Lubomir's assessment in Comment #5. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121826.n1CIQVgl021932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:26:30 EDT --- Any update on the licensing issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121836.n1CIaX5F013670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:36:32 EDT --- Yeah, this is clearly a problem. IC 009. US 021 023 026 036 038. covers the use of the trademark "Battleship" for "computer game programs and accessories for use therewith.", so we need to step very carefully here. "Clanship" is a little closer to "Battleship" than I would like. Given that upstream seems to be dead here, I'm inclined for us to push to rename this in our distribution, because we would be acting as upstream here. Try to avoid using "Battle" or "Ship". Also, the summary borders on trademark infringement with "Battleship clone". Try very hard to describe the game without using the "Battleship" trademark in both the Summary and Description. If you can't do that, let me know, and we'll try to figure out a way to use the mark in the bounds of Fair Use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121839.n1CId0D8024958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:38:59 EDT --- This code is in the Public Domain, should not be a legal issue as long as it is marked properly in the spec file (which it is). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121851.n1CIp2ai017026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-12 13:51:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331729) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331729) Suggested SPEC file with include proposal Patch This SPEC file use a patch attached to this review request to patch the configure script. this is required, because the configure script overwrites the CXXFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:48:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121848.n1CImFsG027060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-12 13:48:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331728) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331728) Patch to get honor %{optflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 18:49:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121849.n1CInkwL027267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 13:49:45 EDT --- There is no legal problem here, I see the notes in 472144 about the relicensing. Please be sure you update the spec appropriately as upstream cleans up (and simplifies) their licensing. Lifting FE-Legal here, leaving it on tvbrowser for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 19:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483663] Review Request: tetgen - A tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121908.n1CJ8mSd020955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483663 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-12 14:08:47 EDT --- Someone should let berlios know that this software should not be hosted there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 19:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121915.n1CJFBZY001006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 14:15:05 EDT --- I'm going to close this as CANTFIX, after consult with Simon Phipps at Sun. There is a possibility that Sun holds the copyright here, but that information is deep deep deep in storage, and Sun would have to spend a significant amount of $$$ to have that information pulled out of its off-site archives. Short of a lawsuit, this isn't going to happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 19:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472792] Review Request: jempbox - A Java library that implements Adobe's XMP specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121919.n1CJJET6023344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472792 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 14:19:12 EDT --- Everything checks out here. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 19:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483320] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902121941.n1CJfJeB006103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483320 William Cohen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wcohen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 20:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122024.n1CKO3Pi005380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #7 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-02-12 15:24:02 EDT --- Responding to Comment #5 7) I have added the /var/lock/subsys/codeanalyst which is created after the service is started, and removed when stopped. I also change the name of the service to "/etc/init.d/codeanalyst". Regarding the warning "service-default-enabled", codeanalyst service requires root to start/stop. Without the default runlevel information, non-root users cannot run the profile after the system is rebooted. However, we do not attempt to start after the package installation or upgrade as stated in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Why_don.27t_we.... Please let me know if this post a problem. Suravee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 20:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122026.n1CKQ2b4016232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #23 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-12 15:25:57 EDT --- I don't know rear, but when looking to the package, I've got a few points: - /usr/share/rear/CHANGES, /usr/share/rear/COPYING, /usr/share/rear/README, you're shipping twice. Kill the files in /usr/share/rear, because one time using %doc is enough. - Why is /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt marked as configuration file? Is it a configuration file? Either it's a readme or it is a configuration file; but if it's readme, it should go into %doc from my point of view. - What's /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_*? Looks like readmes as well, yes/no? - /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.15/rear.8 is shipped already in %{_mandir}, so please not also in %doc, twice is too much. - /usr/share/rear/doc contains stuff, which is already covered by %doc and/or %{_mandir}, so please do not ship the directory at the RPM package. - Is /usr/share/rear meant to be readonly? /usr/share/rear/skel looks to me as it would be used read-writeable as well. - I'm not sure, whether /var/rear is correct, what will this directory contain when it is in regular use? - You maybe want to use "BuildArch" rather "BuildArchitectures", but that is just cosmetic. - Do you really need binutils as during runtime? Just wondering... I don't expect you to change all my stuff mentioned above, various has maybe to get discussed first. Can somebody summarize how /usr/share/rear is used and which meaning it has? No changing content during rear usage? Maybe more will come up, that's what I discovered with the first run... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 20:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122051.n1CKpXHm011879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-12 15:51:30 EDT --- I thought I had commented on this already, but it seems not. Drat. > I've added this workaround. And the package indeed builds fine. > Uh, that's because I'm a stickler for eye-pleasing and I wanted to reserve the > -1 release for the version to import into Fedora CVS. I admit to not really understanding why anyone would care, but as long as what gets checked in is correct then I don't see a problem. > I've checked with upstream and they told me I should consider it as GPLv2+. [...] > I can attach an IRC log snippet if necessary. Can you include that in the package? I checked with spot and he indicated that this is OK as long as you're reasonably certain that the person you were communicating with is the copyright holder. Obviously it will be academic once a version is out, but until then we have to clarify the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 21:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122108.n1CL8kF4015254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 16:08:45 EDT --- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-2.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 21:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122107.n1CL7uME015183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-12 16:07:54 EDT --- Updated files SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/garmintools-0.09-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 21:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122113.n1CLDBLv026112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-12 16:13:10 EDT --- Fabian, please keep the spec file name the same as the SRPM name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 21:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122125.n1CLP1Gw018247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-12 16:25:00 EDT --- * Thu Feb 12 2009 Fabian Affolter - 0.5.5-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.5.5 Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/rednotebook-0.5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 21:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122130.n1CLU0RT018998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Schlomo Schapiro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(gratien.dhaese at it | |3.be) --- Comment #24 from Schlomo Schapiro 2009-02-12 16:29:58 EDT --- Hi, I can shed some light on these questions. - ReaR comes as a self-contained package without any dedicated source distribution. This means that every ReaR installation contains everything needed to make a new package (e.g. "rear mkrpm"). This is very important for the ReaR development process which requires the developer to *trash* the development machine for each and every test. So we simply edit the files, do rear mkrpm, copy aside the RPM and try whether ReaR works (e.g. recovers the system). As a result some files exist twice, once in their "source" location under /usr/share/rear and once in their "installed" location (%doc, %mandir). Since the locations for these are not the same throughout all Linux distros it would be difficult to always collect them from their (possibly unknown) installed location prior to creating the RPM. - the files under /etc/rear are all files that the end-user should change to suit their environment. The *.conf files are actual configurations and the other files are templates that are used by ReaR to create for example the readme file that resides on the ReaR Rescue CD or the email that is sent. So yes, they look like a readme and they are in fact a readme but not for ReaR as a package but for the result that ReaR creates (the rescue media). - in /var/rear we create the recovery data which is machine-dependant and obviously not part of the shipped RPM package - /usr/share/rear should be 755, must be a copy bug somewhere or in the SPEC file. We will fix this of course, no question. HTH, Schlomo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 21:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122155.n1CLtpsN023616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-12 16:55:50 EDT --- Sorry, wrong URL http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.5.20090212svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 22:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122230.n1CMUGL6029765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #27 from David Halik 2009-02-12 17:30:10 EDT --- @Nikolay I looked into the symlinking issue. There was a bug open on this upstream that has now been fixed and allows for proper symlinking to the mozilla wrapper script. http://bugzilla.songbirdnest.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13265 1.1 is due out in the next week or two and this fix will be in it. @kwizart I implemented some more fixes and spun rev 3. It's located here: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm The mozilla startup script I just discussed sets up the proper LD paths to ensure that songbird only uses the provided internal libraries, but I see what you're getting at with the other package provides. I'm looking at the other mozilla packages to ensure that songbird is filtered and doesn't end up providing libxul.so (and others) to the general package population. I also trimmed the vendor source ball to only the required packages. The src.rpm is a much more managable size now. With the next release coming out soon I'm going to try and work with upstream (stevel) to get a reduced size tarball next time. Right now the two major bugs I see are the symlinking wrapper issue in 13265 (which will be fixed soon) and filtering the internal provides to only the necessary ones. Anything else stand out as an obvious problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 23:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122309.n1CN92JY004537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #12 from Paul F. Kunz 2009-02-12 18:08:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'd like to see some fixes prior to further reviewing. It's not trivial to > review the current packaging: > Thanks for the detailed review as it was. > > > BuildRequires: cmake >= 2.4 libxml2-devel >= 2.2.16 icu >= 2.6 libicu-devel > > It's highly recommended to put on BuildRequires per line and either sort them > alphabetically or group them appropriately. > Good idea, I've cleaned it up and it does indeed look a lot better. > icu is > 2.6 for several years. Even in RHEL 5. > Ok, version number removed for icu > Please reconsider the decision to list the versions. Often packagers forget to > keep them up-to-date. > I took versions required from upstream build documentation. > > sh: ruby: command not found > > "BuildRequires: ruby" is missing. > Indeed, fixed. > > -- Warning: GNU Bison not available -- the parser will not be regenerated > > -- Warning: GNU Flex not available -- the lexer will not be regenerated I thought these were on every system, guess not. > > -- PHP5 binding not generated because library and include file not installed. Had to add php-cli as well as php-devel for cmake to find it. > > -- Looking for doxygen... - NOT found > Added doxygen, grapviz for doxygen was already there. > > > > -- Can't build Zorba with TIDY support because TIDY is not found. > > "BuildRequires: libtidy-devel" makes it happy. If you don't want that, adding a Added it. > > > > -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.5 > > -- Could NOT find PythonLibs (missing: PYTHON_LIBRARIES PYTHON_INCLUDE_PATH) > > -- Python binding not generated because library and include file not installed. > > "BuildRequires: python-devel" is missing. > Correct, so I addedit. > > > %description devel > > The %{name}-devel package contains headers for building applications > > that use %{zorba}. > > %{zorba} is undefined. > Fixed it should have been %{name} > > > cmake > > There are guidelines for proper cmake usage: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake > Thanks for the pointer. > In particular, execute "make VERBOSE=1 ..." for increased verbosity in the > build log. > Done. > Then you will find that Fedora's global optimisation flags are not used. This > needs another look after the cmake related fixes. > > > > %files > > > %{_libdir}/*.so.%{version} > > This means that any version upgrade will break ABI compatibility with any > programs linked against this library. That's an indication of an unstable API, > ongoing heavy development, or developers who haven't got the versioning scheme > right. > Fixed. > > > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} > > %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} > > The %dir statement here is superfluous, because the second line already > includes the %name-%version directory and all its contents recursively. You're > advised to make them more explicit with a trailing slash. Like this: > > %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ > > Fixed. > > %files devel > > Here several directories are not included. > In particular: > > %dir %{_includedir}/%{name} > %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name} > %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/%{name}/util > %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/simplestore > %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/simplestore/msdom > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python/examples > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/python/html > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby/examples > %dir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ruby/html > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories > > You could shrink your %files list much by including entire trees recursively or > by increased usage of '*' wildcards where appropriate. Else the only option is > to add as many of the missing %dir statements as necessary. Added the missing %dir SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.5-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 12 23:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902122350.n1CNompb012893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-12 18:50:48 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive-0.10.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Notes: - Added OpenGL wrapper. - Fix requires for dejavu fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 00:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130022.n1D0MlTP019249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 Tony Breeds changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Tony Breeds 2009-02-12 19:22:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libbsr Short Description: Barrier Synchronization Register access library Owners: tbreeds Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 01:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130100.n1D10k7G004767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-12 20:00:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > However, a version is given with the package, and this version is used in the > Python egg distributed with the package. > > http://code.google.com/p/pyfacebook/source/browse/trunk/setup.py#6 Then the version is ok. You still need to follow the pre-release guidelines and use a 0.X release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 04:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130406.n1D46IAR005717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #10 from John Guthrie 2009-02-12 23:06:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Good news -- looks like there's a newer version of ElementTreePanel included in > the java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo package inside > /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/demo/jfc/Notepad/src.zip. According to > the fedora-devel-java mailing list (same thread as before), you should just be > able to delete the included version and copy this one in instead. The license > will have to become something like "GPLv2+ and BSD" > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios). That is SOOOO cool. I was very seriously considering deleting the class and removing the code from the package. Thank you so much for finding this replacement. In any event, I have successfully replaced ExampleFileFilter with FileNameExtensionFilter. The result can be seen here: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/simplyhtml-0.12.5-3.fc10.src.rpm. The new spec file has the same URL as given above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 04:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130411.n1D4BnZu028058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-12 23:11:47 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan, for reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cabal-install Short Description: Haskell package (hackage) tool Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 04:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130418.n1D4IMI1029055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #11 from John Guthrie 2009-02-12 23:18:21 EDT --- What would be the proper/preferred way to include this newer ElementTreePanel.java file? Would I want to just extract the file myself and include it in the SRPM as another source file, or would I want to specify a java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo as a BuildRequirement, and then extract the java file from that package during the %prep phase? (The java file would not be included with the SRPM in the latter option, of course.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 04:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130430.n1D4U3gL030962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-12 23:30:02 EDT --- Michael, since you did the review, could you please assign this bug to yourself ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130634.n1D6YWrZ021428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:34:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130636.n1D6a4WP001022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:36:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130632.n1D6WJTo032611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:32:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130641.n1D6fE6x002089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:41:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130639.n1D6dnYc001485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:39:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481192] Review Request: perl-pgsql_perl5 - Pg - Perl5 extension for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130645.n1D6jeaO023819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481192 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:45:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130644.n1D6iSYe023382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:44:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130642.n1D6gjV9002354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:42:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485206] Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130649.n1D6nrN7024381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:49:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:51:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130651.n1D6pB0x004030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:51:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130648.n1D6mtZ1003376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:48:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130652.n1D6qqXA025186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:52:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130654.n1D6sB4M004403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:54:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130655.n1D6tEl7004797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:55:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130657.n1D6voJ2026045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:57:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130700.n1D70ckC026695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 02:00:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130658.n1D6wpZm026136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:58:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484975] Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130701.n1D71fsV006079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 02:01:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 06:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:59:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130659.n1D6xkur005349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 01:59:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130703.n1D73KQr027191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 02:03:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193210] Review Request: htmldoc - Convert HTML source files into HTML, PostScript, or PDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130704.n1D74Sp9006350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193210 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 02:04:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 07:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130707.n1D7796x006979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 02:07:06 EDT --- Jeremy: Ajax has no desire to maintain this for epel... would you like to do so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 08:20:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:20:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130820.n1D8KG8a009540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-13 03:20:15 EDT --- looks ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 08:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130826.n1D8QLsp022036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 03:26:20 EDT --- I've added BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple) because here's live Test::More. It must be BR because the build failed with requires. Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Harness-Straps/perl-Test-Harness-Straps.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Harness-Straps/perl-Test-Harness-Straps-0.30-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 08:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130839.n1D8dZWh024445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Jani Mikkonen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Jani Mikkonen 2009-02-13 03:39:34 EDT --- I'll check the changes suggested but question: i can't check the graphics at the moment but if there are any that has the offending words that resemble the (TM), does those need changes too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 08:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130859.n1D8xfQ8028459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 03:59:40 EDT --- The BR should be perl(Test::More). Fixed, rebuilt. Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Harness-Straps/perl-Test-Harness-Straps.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Harness-Straps/perl-Test-Harness-Straps-0.30-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130903.n1D93YZL017954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-13 04:03:33 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130904.n1D94HPZ030377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at schampijer.de --- Comment #8 from Simon Schampijer 2009-02-13 04:04:15 EDT --- mbarnes rebuilt it a few days ago since it was broken - should be good to go now. Anything that is missing spec wise now for getting this in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130909.n1D99oZ7019615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #9 from Simon Schampijer 2009-02-13 04:09:49 EDT --- Latest 0.84 version for read is 63 http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Read/Read-63.tar.bz2 Building Read depending on the latest evince would only work for rawhide of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130914.n1D9EMWP000401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-13 04:14:21 EDT --- I will update the spec file and post a new SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130931.n1D9Va43004688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 04:31:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Harness-Straps Short Description: Detailed analysis of test results Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130932.n1D9WWp5004869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #38 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-02-13 04:32:30 EDT --- Jaroslav - Patch creation time (sorry). There is a newer version of the plasmoid this version adds the ability to get the computer to speak the results of the translation. A very cool feature I think. So. I would very much like to get this version patched before I start building the packages The current spec has the lines referring to the patches commented out so that I could make sure the application compiles, installs and runs. It does. And of course I had to add the lines that installed the country flags. I've made the request to the developer of the plasmoid over at: http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/translatoid?content=97511 to give us an option to disable the country flags at compile time. He will be exploring two possibilities; to provide a cmake flag to disable the flags, or to provide the flags in a separate archive. In any case he is working on it. The urls to the current spec and srpms follow. Thanks Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec Spec URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: ftp://orbsky.homelinux.org/pub/packages/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130937.n1D9bKSe006159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-13 04:37:18 EDT --- Package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 09:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483016] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Debug - Perl debug output package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902130947.n1D9lK4E008259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483016 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 10:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131014.n1DAEJ6h014283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-13 05:14:18 EDT --- I'd expand the summary somewhat, for example: GUI for Tor, the anonymizing overlay network for TCP GUI for Tor, per se is a description, but is quite short, and there's room for explanation what Tor is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 10:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131056.n1DAuPxv023434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-13 05:56:24 EDT --- Thank you, i emailed this patch to upstream. I'm in a good contact with him :-) I will continue today and i hope we finished it soon. Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 11:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131112.n1DBClZ3014569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #29 from Thomas Moschny 2009-02-13 06:12:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > so, can you please remove out the usure files (if uncertain: every) so the > package got imported in fedora. Done. Package imported into rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 11:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131123.n1DBNsbc029339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-13 06:23:52 EDT --- Cleaned up patches and spec file. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/open64-4.2.1-6.fc10.src.rpm koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 11:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131136.n1DBavj9019933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-13 06:36:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'll check the changes suggested but question: i can't check the graphics at > the moment but if there are any that has the offending words that resemble the > (TM), does those need changes too ? Yes I'm afraid so, sorry for getting you in to this mess. You can always drop this package if it becomes too much work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131206.n1DC6C92026588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |KyaPanel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131201.n1DC1ssU025647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-13 07:01:52 EDT --- > Building Read depending on the latest evince would only work for rawhide of > course. Yes, but sugar-evince was never in the rest of Fedora mainline anyway so it shouldn't cause any issues, except it will only be supported on F11 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] New: Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Summary: Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: KyaPanel is a panel to provide easy management in Gnu/Linux servers, developed to increase the network administration. Two modules are included in this new version: E-mail Management and Samba Management. The E-mail Module can manage a server with Postfix + Courier and two options of database: OpenLDAP or SQL. If you choose SQL then KyaPanel offers two options: PostgreSQL or MySQL. kyapanel is writen by my friend Anahuac website http://www.kyapanel.com/ rpm and spec files will comming soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485402] Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131214.n1DCEoGE008070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libytnef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485402] Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131214.n1DCEtsw008112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131214.n1DCEs5P008092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485402] New: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Summary: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/libytnef/libytnef.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/libytnef/libytnef-1.5-1.src.rpm Description: TNEF Stream Parser Library, used by "ytnef" to decode TNEF (winmail.dat) streams generated by Microsoft Outlook. ---- koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131220.n1DCKSJO029618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485402] Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131219.n1DCJWFL029183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131219.n1DCJV4j029163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131220.n1DCKSbV029596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] New: Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Summary: Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ytnef/ytnef.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ytnef/ytnef-2.6-2.src.rpm Description: Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. Can take a TNEF Stream (winmail.dat) sent from Microsoft Outlook (or similar products) and extract the attachments, including construction of Contact Cards & Calendar entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131220.n1DCKs1c009736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|485403 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131220.n1DCKrxM009715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|485401 | Alias| |ytnef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131222.n1DCMftN030068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131222.n1DCMeDW030047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:34:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131234.n1DCYtSZ032564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-13 07:34:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm I have fixed the license and submitted a new bug about library-calling-exit Regarding ppc ppc64, there was already a bug filled about the problem. The solutions seems to be as easy as removing sys/io.h includes. https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2215787&group_id=90275&atid=593019 So I have created a patch that does exactly that. The package now builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 12:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485206] Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131238.n1DCc8sH001123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:03:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131303.n1DD3Ffs019375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131308.n1DD8TAJ020545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 08:08:27 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: fc962eb4a529f467911494d9d508512f OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. The installation is ugly as was mentioned before. But this is not blocker for a review according to guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131313.n1DDD7TX010106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Bug 485403 depends on bug 485402, which changed state. Bug 485402 Summary: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131313.n1DDD6oT010089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Bug 485401 depends on bug 485402, which changed state. Bug 485402 Summary: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485402] Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131313.n1DDD4iq010059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-13 08:13:02 EDT --- this package alrealy exists in fedora, closing ticket https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libytnef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131316.n1DDGBYD022656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Luk?? Tinkl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131316.n1DDGRKB022721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131323.n1DDN28T024202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-13 08:23:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-Utils Short Description: NOCpulse utility packages Owners: msuchy Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131337.n1DDbwBX028381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Luk?? Tinkl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Luk?? Tinkl 2009-02-13 08:37:56 EDT --- RPMLINT: [ltinkl at localhost ~/tmp/kio_sysinfo-20081121]$ rpmlint kio_sysinfo kio_sysinfo.spec kio_sysinfo-20081121-1.fc9.src.rpm [ltinkl at localhost ~/tmp/kio_sysinfo-20081121]$ rpmlint kio_sysinfo-20081121-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. The package cleanly built and meets all the required MUST's with the above exception, I still think it's not necessary to do desktop-file-install as this application provides a service, not a standalone application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131346.n1DDkbud030495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 08:46:35 EDT --- FAIL source files match upstream The source should be written as whole path. OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124650 OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Shouldn't be test executed as a part of build process? (btw you have ugly man page of rhnpush the synopsis part.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 13:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131356.n1DDuOZj020524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-13 08:56:23 EDT --- Ok, thank you! - license is OK - build is OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131407.n1DE7C5r023199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 --- Comment #5 from Luk?? Tinkl 2009-02-13 09:07:12 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131407.n1DE7d7a003137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |allisson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-13 09:07:38 EDT --- koji scratch build in dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:12:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:12:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131412.n1DECZrb024497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-13 09:12:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kio_sysinfo Short Description: KIO slave which shows basic system information Owners: jreznik ltinkl kkofler rdieter than Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:15:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131415.n1DEFdFn005170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-13 09:15:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libapogee Short Description: Library for Apogee CCD Cameras Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] New: Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Summary: Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gcosta at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios.spec SRPM URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios-2.3.8-0.1.git36989b0d2.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is the BIOS to be used in the Bochs Project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] New: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Summary: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rspanton at zepler.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc-3.2.3-1.20090210cvs.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU GCC, which can be used to compile for the msp430 platform, instead of for the native i386 platform. The mspgcc project has maintained patches against gcc 3.2.3 for a long time. The documented procedure for installing mspgcc is taking their patches and applying them against gcc. I based this on the avr-gcc spec. One rpmlint warning: msp430-gcc.spec:46: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -e 's,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libexecdir,' $a > $b I don't believe this error is fatal. The script needs to modify the os_install_post script so that the build system doesn't try to process the msp430 binaries with the tools for the host's architecture. Build fails on ppc64 in koji, but succeeds on all the other arches (I shall attach the error message to this bug shortly). I'd really appreciate a review of this. Thanks :-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] New: Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Summary: Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gcosta at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios.spec SRPM URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios-1.0-0.1.svn450.fc11.src.rpm Description: The OpenBIOS project provides you with most free and open source Open Firmware implementations available. Here you find several implementations of IEEE 1275-1994 (Referred to as Open Firmware) compliant firmware. Among its features, Open Firmware provides an instruction set independent device interface. This can be used to boot the operating system from expansion cards without native initialization code. It is Open Firmware's goal to work on all common platforms, like x86, AMD64, PowerPC, ARM and Mips. With its flexible and modular design, Open Firmware targets servers, workstations and embedded systems, where a sane and unified firmware is a crucial design goal and reduces porting efforts noticably. Open Firmware is found on many servers and workstations and there are sever commercial implementations from SUN, Firmworks, CodeGen, Apple, IBM and others. In most cases, the Open Firmware implementations provided on this site rely on an additional low-level firmware for hardware initialization, such as coreboot or U-Boot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:32:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131432.n1DEWxci009182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #1 from Robert Spanton 2009-02-13 09:32:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331830) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331830) koji ppc64 build.log ending in failure. As documented in specfile, build fails in koji for ppc64. I attach the build.log for this failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] New: Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Summary: Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gcosta at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios.spec SRPM URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios-0.6-0.1beta.fc11.src.rpm Description: vgabios is an LPGL implementation of a bios for a video card. It is tied to plex86/bochs, althoug it will likely work on other emulators. It is not intended for use in real cards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131440.n1DEePZk011045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #2 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-02-13 09:40:24 EDT --- Ok, I'll try and find time to have a look at this over the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 14:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] New: Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: BIRT is an Eclipse-based open source reporting system for web applications, especially those based on Java and J2EE. BIRT has two main components: a report designer based on Eclipse, and a runtime component that you can add to your app server. BIRT also offers a charting engine that lets you add charts to your own application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131505.n1DF5lrG004710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Eduardo Habkost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ehabkost at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:05:46 EDT --- > Summary: Portable x86 PC emulator Is bochs-bios a "portable x86 PC emulator"? > Patch0: 0001_bx-qemu.patch I hope this doesn't break any guidelines on naming patches. I think using the package name as a prefix for patch file names is good practice, even if not explicitly required by Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131509.n1DF9cFV005375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #2 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:09:37 EDT --- > mkdir -p prebuilt > cd prebuilt > tar -xzf %{SOURCE1} You can probably use %setup here, with magic parameters to make it create prebuilt/ and unpack only %{SOURCE1} inside it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131511.n1DFBrqJ018043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #17 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-13 10:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > I've checked with upstream and they told me I should consider it as GPLv2+. > [...] > > I can attach an IRC log snippet if necessary. > > Can you include that in the package? I checked with spot and he indicated that > this is OK as long as you're reasonably certain that the person you were > communicating with is the copyright holder. Obviously it will be academic once > a version is out, but until then we have to clarify the license. I've included it as "license-clarification.txt" in the package and it gets installed along with the other documentation. New files: Spec file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras.spec SRPM file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras-2.0.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131513.n1DFDkNL006606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Eduardo Habkost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ehabkost at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:13:44 EDT --- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.bin > %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.cirrus.bin > %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.cirrus.debug.bin > %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.debug.bin Your package also owns %{_datadir}/vgabios, doesn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131514.n1DFEV6w018570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:14:30 EDT --- I will recheck this package once the srpm is renewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131516.n1DFGk3e019325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:16:45 EDT --- > %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131517.n1DFHA7p007703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #2 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:17:09 EDT --- > %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131518.n1DFIijs019860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:18:44 EDT --- > %doc Uh? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131521.n1DFLm57020779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #4 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 10:21:47 EDT --- 1) yeah, we do own vgabios directory. I now remember having this problem with etherboot too, but forgot about it. 2) Forgot again 3) Got from a template, slipped through my fingers. I'll update the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131521.n1DFLiY3020754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Eduardo Habkost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ehabkost at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:21:43 EDT --- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %dir %{_datadir}/openbios/openbios-sparc32 > %dir %{_datadir}/openbios/openbios-sparc64 > #%dir %{_datadir}/openbios/openbios-ppc Shouldn't the package own the %{_datadir}/openbios directory? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131525.n1DFPBNB009690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmc at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-13 10:25:10 EDT --- Reviewers: see bug #464621 for a review of similar package (etherboot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131524.n1DFOuP5009332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmc at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-13 10:24:55 EDT --- Reviews: see bug #464621 for a review of similar package (etherboot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131525.n1DFPR5P021824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmc at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-13 10:25:26 EDT --- Reviewers: see bug #464621 for a review of similar package (etherboot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131546.n1DFkcPv014071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(stuart at gathman.or | |g) --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:46:36 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131544.n1DFiCAb025845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alexeskin at yahoo.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:44:10 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131542.n1DFg5S0025587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:42:01 EDT --- Well: * Not a blocker, however "rpm -ivv cloog-ppl" bears some warning on info file: --------------------------------------------------------- D: adding 4 entries to Filedigests index. D: install: %post(cloog-ppl-0.15-0.3.gitad322.fc11.i386) synchronous scriptlet start D: install: %post(cloog-ppl-0.15-0.3.gitad322.fc11.i386) execv(/bin/sh) pid 5361 + /sbin/ldconfig + /sbin/install-info /usr/share/info/cloog.info /usr/share/info/dir install-info: warning: no info dir entry in `/usr/share/info/cloog.info' --------------------------------------------------------- * Usually for a packager needing sponsorship, I request him/her to either - submit another review request - or do a (at least one) pre-review of other person's review request as written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored . Do you have another review request of yours or review requests on which you did some pre-review? Note: Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131548.n1DFmbRs014337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(joseluisblancoc at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:48:36 EDT --- (The submitter replied to me that update will come in a few days) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131549.n1DFnMHv027138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bruno at gnoll.org) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:49:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 15:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131558.n1DFwmTj017035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gratien.dhaese at it | |3.be) | --- Comment #25 from Gratien D'haese 2009-02-13 10:58:46 EDT --- Hi all, thank you (Robert) for taking a closer look into rear - much appreciated - the goal is indeed to make the software cleaner (and better). As Schlomo (in #24) already mentioned the doc files are kept double for the simple reason that it is very easy to make a new 'in-house' rpm for example (with the command 'rear mkrpm'). However, if we must exclude them, we can of course. In that case the customers who want to build their own in-house rpms should work with a tar-ball of rear instead. Less convenient I think, but not impossible. We could also provide SVN/CVS to accomplish this. What does fedora recommend? In the rpmls output all directories have mode 755. I think Robert question was to check if the /usr/share/rear directory was meant to be in read-only mode. The short answer is yes. During a normal run (mkrescue/mkbackup workflow) rear will not write nor modify anything under /usr/share/rear. We have /var/rear which will be used to create the recovery information under. Do not hesitate to ask if you need more clarification. We're happy to answer and to comply as much as possible to fedora's rules. best regards, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131600.n1DG0XAk030613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-13 11:00:31 EDT --- - please add a comment stating why we're only building the feature we are - please add information about steps to get us to a full BIRT here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse - please add a comment above the one patch stating why we're doing this - let's change the variable "qualifier" to "rhinoqualifier" to avoid confusion - should we be using the same qualifier as BIRT like we do with Mylyn? Lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay: * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - please add some line continuations to fix this where possible * package successfully compiles and builds * BuildRequires are proper * macros fine * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * md5sum matches upstream * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. * summary and description good * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used correctly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output * changelog format okay * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * not native, so no rpath, static linking, etc. * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel necessary * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no translations so no locale handling * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * package includes license text in the package and marks it with %doc * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/eclipse-birt-2.3.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-xml.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-xml.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-parser.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-parser.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/fop.jar ../../../../../java/fop.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-svg-dom.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-svg-dom.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xml.resolver_1.2.0.jar ../../../../../java/xml-commons-resolver.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/javax.xml_1.3.4.jar ../../../../../java/xml-commons-apis.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/xml-commons-apis-ext.jar ../../../../../java/xml-commons-apis-ext.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-dom.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-dom.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xerces_2.9.0.jar ../../../../../java/xerces-j2.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-svggen.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-svggen.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-awt-util.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-awt-util.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/rhino/eclipse/plugins/org.mozilla.rhino_1.6.7.v20080214/lib/js.jar ../../../../../../../java/js.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-swing.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-swing.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-css.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-css.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.commons.codec_1.3.0.jar ../../../../../java/commons-codec.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-extension.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-extension.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/javax.wsdl_1.5.0.jar ../../../../../java/wsdl4j.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-util.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-util.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-bridge.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-bridge.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/sac.jar ../../../../../java/sac.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-transcoder.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-transcoder.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xml.serializer_2.7.1.jar ../../../../../java/xalan-j2-serializer.jar eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-gui-util.jar ../../../../../java/batik/batik-gui-util.jar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 23 warnings. These are fine as they're all relative symlinks. * I verified that it installs and that the chart feature is picked up by plugins requiring it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131606.n1DG602w019579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paul Lange 2009-02-13 11:05:59 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts (change to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts) New Branches: none Owners: palango I did a mistake with the package name when filling it into the Request. Sorry for that! Could you please rename the package to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts . Thank you very much and sorry for the circumstances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131604.n1DG4OER031570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #6 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 11:04:22 EDT --- Ok, Updated it. You can grab: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios-0.6-0.2beta.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131614.n1DGEwxU021683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #5 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 11:14:57 EDT --- wrt setup: Maybe we could use it, but what would it buy us? the rpm directives seem to be quite arcane, I believe this is much cleaner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131621.n1DGLYoH004290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #7 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 11:21:33 EDT --- %changelog seems to be in reverse order. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131646.n1DGkQEK009728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-13 11:46:25 EDT --- Apart from what Michael said: * The group for the -doc subpackage should probably be Documentation instead of Applications/Publishing. * The source tarball does not have the proper timestamp. You can use, for example wget -N http://URLtoSOURCEfile to get it with the right timestamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 16:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131655.n1DGtt6Q011903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #6 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 11:55:54 EDT --- Updated: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios-2.3.8-0.2.git36989b0d2.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131707.n1DH72JJ014556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 --- Comment #3 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 12:07:01 EDT --- Updated: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios-1.0-0.2.svn450.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131715.n1DHF76Y016170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-13 12:15:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt-2.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > - please add a comment stating why we're only building the feature we are Fixed. It was already done but more details added. > - please add information about steps to get us to a full BIRT here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse Fixed. Same as previous. > - please add a comment above the one patch stating why we're doing this Fixed. > - let's change the variable "qualifier" to "rhinoqualifier" to avoid confusion Fixed. > - should we be using the same qualifier as BIRT like we do with Mylyn? No. Different BIRT plugins hava different qualifiers so it's not applicable. > > Lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay: > > * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - please add some line continuations to fix this where possible Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131728.n1DHSAY0018862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Alex Eskin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(alexeskin at yahoo.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Alex Eskin 2009-02-13 12:28:09 EDT --- Sorry, I was away for a bit. I will test your patch and respond to the other comments this weekend. Also I do not have a rawhide system handy. Did you test it on rawhide already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131734.n1DHYVqA019915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-13 12:34:29 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED; just fix up the release to an integer >= 1 when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131754.n1DHs7Zs009718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 12:54:06 EDT --- For 0.4.4-2: * License - Although the project URL says this is under GPLv2, judging from the source tarball the license tag should be "GPLv2+" * Version information is specified only in src/iptux.cpp, which is under GPLv2+ * Also src/AboutIptux.cpp shows this is under GPLv2+ (this can be seen by Help->About on iptux) * ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F * BuildRequires - This srpm won't build without "BR: gettext" http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1125112 * Timestamps - Please consider to use ------------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------------ to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated from recent autotools. * %{?name} - I guess using %{name} is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131754.n1DHsc8W024189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 12:54:37 EDT --- Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 17:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131757.n1DHveCP025035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 12:57:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Also I do not have a rawhide system handy. Did you test it > on rawhide already? Like other packages I reviewed I don't know how to use this software so I did just some basic test for this software (like if the software lauches) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 18:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131836.n1DIaDUP019414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-13 13:36:12 EDT --- Thanks. This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 19:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131911.n1DJBJ1V007704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 19:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] New: Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Summary: Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dodji at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/geglmm/geglmm.spec-0.0.22-1 SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/geglmm/geglmm-0.0.22-1.src.rpm Description: This is the C++ binding of the GEGL graph based image processing framework. This bindings adhere to the APIs of the gtkmm2 library. I have put the result of rpmlint at http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/geglmm/rpmlint-output-geglmm.spec-0.0.22-1.txt. It's spitting an only-non-binary-in-usr-lib error, and I think it's because of the things that are being install in %{_libdir}, like the m4 files, the pkgconfig files and the configuration header files. Those files are necessary, I think. Isn't rpmlint being a bit too pedantic ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 19:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131913.n1DJD377027244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-13 14:13:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-birt Short Description: Eclipse-based reporting system Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 19:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902131940.n1DJeYND000951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #28 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-13 14:40:33 EDT --- For the info problem, I will submit a bug report to upstream. As for the second review request, I have just filed a new one at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 20:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484975] Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132038.n1DKcT0E028598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 15:38:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 20:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132038.n1DKcKnE028531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 15:38:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 20:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132038.n1DKcOmq028563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 15:38:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 20:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132057.n1DKvFq6000995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #7 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-02-13 15:57:14 EDT --- Alright. Finally found some free time to work on this again. I have split the rpm into two packages, the rpm and a devel rpm. The links are below. Please have a look and let me know what else needs to be changed. Thanks again for all suggestions/feedback. Spec URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC.spec RPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.1-5.fc10.i386.rpm SRPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.1-5.fc10.src.rpm DEVEL RPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-devel-1.1.1-5.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 21:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132139.n1DLdNNa009013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #26 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-13 16:39:21 EDT --- Right, I just wanted to make sure, that /usr/share/rear usually doesn't get touched at all and dynamic stuff ends in /var or the config stuff in /etc. I didn't get the SVN/CVS suggestion. I think, the "rear mkrpm" thing can easily solved with some RPM macros inside of the spec file which do just the right thing, if it is executed on Fedora and/or RHEL. Would that be acceptable for you? E.g. %if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel} rm -f unwanted-file-at-fedora %endif Or %if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel} # Fedora specific stuff %else # Other distribution stuff %endif If that's okay, I would try to provide you a working example. Hopefully I got your point correct, but I think so. Just let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 21:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132146.n1DLkSWE010797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #28 from David Halik 2009-02-13 16:46:24 EDT --- Based off of the method used in the Thunderbird package, the internal provides are now filtered out properly. This avoids any potential conflicts between system libraries, such as libxul, and those packaged with Songbird. http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 22:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132213.n1DMDXOs000703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-02-13 17:13:32 EDT --- I've updated the packages: - fixed an installation problem - corrected the license field with the help of Jason Tibbitts (fedora-legal mailing list) Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki.spec SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki-0.9.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 22:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132238.n1DMcAs6004563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net --- Comment #27 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-02-13 17:38:09 EDT --- Hello Gratien, Robert was kind enough to ask me whether I'd be willing to sponsor this. A cursory glance at the spec looks good, but please add some linebreaks and \ to the long lines in the %install part of the .spec file. This makes things much easier to read. The review looks okay so far, seems the .spec has come a long way. :) As soon as Robert indicates he's finished I'll do a final test of the software and recheck the review. After that, I'd be happy to sponsor you. That okay with you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 23:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132310.n1DNACha010261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #3 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-13 18:10:11 EDT --- Yep, I'm quoting the answer to my email: " Hey, Milos, I fixed compilation with recent Audacious versions in 3.1.0-rc7. [http://www.luminal.org/files/imms/imms-3.1.0-rc7.tar.bz2] I am fairly sure all the code in question is GPL. I made sure of that before including it. I do not have the time to follow up with the authors of the code right now, but I'm certainly willing to apply any patches to clarify licenses. Perhaps, Artur, the Debian IMMS maintainer (cc'ed) can help you there. He already did some work on getting explicit releases from the authors. Have fun, Michael. " It seems that all the thins are GPL indeed...looking into debian(lenny) imms packages, I found following: " +Author: Michael Grigoriev + +Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Michael Grigoriev + +With the following exceptions: + + md5.{h,c} (added ability to restrict maximum size to process) + from GNU textutils + levenshtein.{h,c} (stripped down) + python-Levenshtein library + by David Necas (Yeti) + regexx.{h,cc} (stripped down) + Regexx - Regular Expressions C++ solution + by Gustavo Niemeyer + xidle.{h,cc} + Borrows from xautolock 2.1 + by Michel Eyckmans (MCE) + normal.h + by by Agner Fog " I'll prepare patches and request adding a LICENSE file into the source tarball and license information to all the source files (and merging the gcc43 patch of course too). I'd also include the above information as %doc. Would it be ok then? Regarding the review: the audacious plugin is working now, updated link are here: New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.3.rc7.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1125850 As there are now both xmms and audacious plugins available, I'm considering splitting the package into a main one and two subpackages (-xmms, -audacious), I'm just not sure whether this wouldn't hit the usability from the user point of view too much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 13 23:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902132319.n1DNJRkC012044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 18:19:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Urgh... > Please filter out perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Exception) from the automatic > Requires. A quick glance shows no use for them except in the tests. Where are you seeing these? The srpm depends on them, but I can't find them generated anywhere else... (on my F-10 system, at least) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 00:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140027.n1E0R6hZ006716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Stuart D Gathman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(stuart at gathman.or | |g) | --- Comment #27 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-02-13 19:27:04 EDT --- Swamped at my paying job. Debating whether to try and submit milter/milter-spf [http://bmsi.com/python/milter.html] as my test (it would be nice to have a package that actually *uses* pymilter as part of Fedora). The problem is, I already know they don't currently meet Fedora packaging guidelines. I suppose if I "flunk" I can keep trying. I would also need to upgrade my home server to Fedora 10 to test running everything under Fedora. (Currently runs in production on EL3, EL4, EL5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 00:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140040.n1E0ebTm027269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:40:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 00:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140046.n1E0k79G028206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:46:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 00:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140043.n1E0hROt009180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:43:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 00:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140044.n1E0iwdS009296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:44:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 00:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140048.n1E0mVRo010040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:48:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140111.n1E1BQgk031994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-13 20:11:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-simple-rss Short Description: A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby Owners: stahnma kanarip Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485542] New: Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 Summary: Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: scarter4 at learn.senecac.on.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~scarter4/breip-font.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~scarter4/breip-font-0.5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Breip is a handwriting font made by Alan Hussey using the handwriting of his friend Adam Breipohl, hence the name 'breip'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:08:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485542] Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140108.n1E18wYf013066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 Stephen Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484057] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140111.n1E1BhSZ013636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 --- Comment #2 from Stephen Carter 2009-02-13 20:11:42 EDT --- My second font submission can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 . I will be cleaning up this one and uploading fresh packages very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485542] Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140112.n1E1Cu32013774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 --- Comment #1 from Stephen Carter 2009-02-13 20:12:56 EDT --- I also have another font awaiting review, which you can find here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 . I need two clean font package submissions to be sponsored, and this is my second package. Comments and reviews are welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140113.n1E1D9Ze013814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 20:13:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 01:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140130.n1E1UCGd016606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-13 20:30:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 02:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140200.n1E20k58021193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-13 21:00:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 02:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140231.n1E2VbOP011482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #2 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-13 21:31:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush-0.3.1-3.fc10.src.rpm * I have updated the package slightly. I added a source description, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL . * I tried to play with %check and tests, but I couldn't them to work. It seems like I am missing a harness setup of some type. I will ping the sw-dev list and see if I can find out anything. Either way, that shouldn't be a blocker for package review. * Man page: It's a little different than many, but certainly not wrong. See (man vim), it looks similar. I think it's because the man page is generated using doc2book on the SGML file. I'd rather just write it in groff, but I am not upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 02:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140248.n1E2mh6I014036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #3 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-13 21:48:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush-0.3.1-4.fc10.src.rpm * Found a better Source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 03:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140303.n1E337xZ016199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller 2009-02-13 22:03:06 EDT --- I'll hopefully be able to get to this tomorrow evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 03:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140354.n1E3sx8X025393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-13 22:54:57 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide. Closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1126104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 07:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140730.n1E7UUfr026059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #18 from Remi Collet 2009-02-14 02:30:27 EDT --- Grr... .src.cpm seems broken :( And version 2.1.14 available... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 08:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:06:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902140806.n1E86x7N031843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #19 from Remi Collet 2009-02-14 03:06:58 EDT --- Notes : Typo error in %preun Satellite obmSatellite -> obm-satellite Question Why the mysql subpackage requires obm main package ? Shouldn't we be able to install the database on a different server than the UI ? A solution is to make obm a meta package to install all the component at the same time (including database and SGBD, what most user need), and a subpackage for the UI (for expert users who want to split installation). It could be a good idea to have a separate package for Artichow lib to avoid multiple installation. License for Artichow is "Public Domain" /etc/obm : owned by obm and obm-config /etc/obm-satellite : not owned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 11:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141136.n1EBaDxZ018691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fkooman at tuxed.net --- Comment #2 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-02-14 06:36:12 EDT --- - build it in Mock to find all the missing build requirements, there are quite some I found out when trying to rebuild the SRPM without having all the required build requirements installed {libwnck-devel, libnotify-devel???, gnome-menus-devel, xfce4-panel-devel} - run "rpmlint" on the spec, the srpm and the generated RPMs to find more problems. - The BuildRoot doesn't follow Guidelines. - The description lines are too long, wrap them Cool there is a package for this! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 11:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141139.n1EBdseW005173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 06:39:52 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 11:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141140.n1EBeNOZ005558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 06:40:21 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 11:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485542] Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141138.n1EBcEgv004935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-14 06:38:13 EDT --- 1. If you have access to the fonts sources, please start by removing the pre-built *.ttf and *.otf and only ship the result of your build in the noarch package 2. Do not try to package both ttf and otf formats http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Choosing_the_right_font_format_to_package 3. The otf file in the archive looks suspiciously bigger thant the ttf file, and it has a newer timestamp. Please check with upstream it was actually build from the packaged sfds and not from a more recent version they forgot to publish 4. You need to add fontforge to buildrequires if you want you package to build in mock/koji. If you want to maintain packages in Fedora it's a good idea to install mock on your system http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock 5. you can drop %dir %{_fontdir} for fedora-devel (will probably change the behaviour of the macros in F9 and F10 too soonish) 6. your fontconfig file is not finished -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 11:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141139.n1EBdYsE019145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 06:39:32 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 11:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141143.n1EBhIrV020044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 06:43:17 EDT --- Blocker - missing fcode utils as BuildReqires. You should consider packaging them also. http://www.openfirmware.info/FCODE_suite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 12:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141242.n1ECg7jj030963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-14 07:42:06 EDT --- My mistake. I was in a rpm -qp over all the rpm files in the folder and did not notice that the src.rpm was involved. We are fine as we are, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 13:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141317.n1EDH7hV023305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 13:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:29:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141329.n1EDTeCg025420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #2 from Pascal 2009-02-14 08:29:39 EDT --- Update to match new upstream release. srpm: http://fedora.debroglie.net/SRPMS/10/objcryst-fox-1.8.0.3-1.fc10.debroglie.src.rpm spec: http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/objcryst-fox.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 13:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141356.n1EDukwM030573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-14 08:56:44 EDT --- Yeah, this is sufficient for Fedora Legal. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 13:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] New: Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 Summary: Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fsarchiver.spec SRPM URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fsarchiver-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: fsarchiver can backup filesystems and restore the result on a different filesystem (even if the type and the size of the new differs) while preserving attributes like permissions, timestamps, symbolic-links,hard-links, extended-attributes, ... Koji scartch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1126566 rpmlint: "3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 14:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454164] Review Request: tweet - A simple Twitter desktop client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141435.n1EEZLkh005678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454164 --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-14 09:35:20 EDT --- It looks like Emmanuele stopped developing Tweet, but he did remove twitter-glib from the project and he just did a release (0.9.2) of that 2 days ago that would probably be worthwhile to add to Fedora if your interested. http://github.com/ebassi/twitter-glib/downloads -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 15:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141523.n1EFNoQt027337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 17:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141733.n1EHXf0T000431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-14 12:33:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > It's spitting an only-non-binary-in-usr-lib error, and I think it's because of > the things that are being install in %{_libdir}, like the m4 files, the > pkgconfig files and the configuration header files. + rpmlint won't complain for pkgconfig file as only-non-binary-in-usr-lib, however for m4 files and header file rpmlint currently complains. For this package this rpmlint can be ignored. Then: Some random notes: - Please consider to use %{?dist} macro: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag - Source0 must be given with full URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - gegl-devel Requires babl-devel, so "BuildRequires: babl-devel" is redundant. - Usually the dependencies between binary rpms rebuilt from a srpm must be EVR (not just version) specific. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package - This srpm won't build on dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1126647 - We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Please consider to add the following files ------------------------------------------------------------ AUTHORS COPYING COPYING.LESSER ------------------------------------------------------------ to main package and ------------------------------------------------------------ ChangeLog ------------------------------------------------------------ to -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 18:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141824.n1EIOgUm023018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 18:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141822.n1EIMjEe022842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #22 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-14 13:22:44 EDT --- Thank you Mamoru Tasaka I have corrected the errors. Could you review again? Also, I have upgraded iptux to 0.4.5-rc1. But this version is not an official release. Maybe there are some bugs. But Building it is quite OK. Here is URL: SPEC (I have upgraded to 0.4.5-rc1) http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux.spec SPRM (0.4.5-rc1) http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.5-0.1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm SPRM (0.4.4-2, the package has been updated, not that old package.) http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 18:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141845.n1EIjC2g012378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-14 13:45:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 18:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484486] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Excel - Convert between DateTime and Excel dates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141845.n1EIj9Hd026945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484486 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-14 13:45:08 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 18:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141852.n1EIqxj2013918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-14 13:52:57 EDT --- Yes, lots of package spec files "out there" seem to work, but there are many packaging pitfalls, and suddenly the packages break in unexpected ways. ;-) [...] The packaging is fine now. diffuse-0.2.15-4.fc10.src.rpm : APPROVED [...] I see you don't have any other review requests currently, and the NEEDSPONSOR keyword is set. What are your plans with regard to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141902.n1EJ2WXW030161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-14 14:02:32 EDT --- Preserving source tarball timestamps is not mandatory. And it is of only limited use (i.e. one can recognise the age of tarballs where timestamps are accurate, without listing its contents). Upon loading source archives into the lookaside cache, timestamps are lost anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141909.n1EJ9Y53031116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 14:09:33 EDT --- Blocker - it's a bad, bad idea, to use %{release} in source's naming scheme: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ LANG=C rpmbuild -ba vgabios.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Ptmxi + umask 022 + cd /home/petro/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd /home/petro/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf vgabios-0.6 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/petro/rpmbuild/SOURCES/vgabios-0.6.tgz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd vgabios-0.6 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + mkdir prebuilt + cd prebuilt + tar -zxf /home/petro/rpmbuild/SOURCES/vgabios-binaries-0.6-0.2beta.fc10.tar.gz tar: /home/petro/rpmbuild/SOURCES/vgabios-binaries-0.6-0.2beta.fc10.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now tar: Child returned status 2 tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Ptmxi (%prep) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6Ptmxi (%prep) [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141928.n1EJSEfe001676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 14:28:13 EDT --- I don't like the idea with shipping pre-built blobs. Please, explain, why we can't compile dev86 for non-x86 arches? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dev86/ I just commented out string with ExclusiveArch and it at least builds on my PowerPC. Will try to assembly this firmware with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141935.n1EJZXRr021431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Armin 2009-02-14 14:35:32 EDT --- ok, my turn to be picky: SPEC: - in line 2: put 2 % in the comment (#%%define) - yea, all descriptions are just too long. Cut them to about 80 characters per line - There should be a free line between %files. (xfce-panel and gnome-panel are squished together. I will try to build it now and see what I get. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141937.n1EJbsoQ021936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 14:37:53 EDT --- Ok, I successed in building it on my Mac Mini G4. However, I don't know how to test these blobs :). Anyway, here are my suggestions: * Provide dev86 for all arches (not only for x86/x86_64) * Mark this package as noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141937.n1EJboWE021890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-14 14:37:49 EDT --- This is a simple package; it builds fine and rpmlint is silent. Review: OK source files match upstream: 974ff01225273f1ef70c5f1a2d27d25b219bc43719f90ea80e550feaab46876f unalz-0.64.tgz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary a short and concise description. OK description is OK. Ok dist tag is present. OK build root is sane. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: unalz = 0.64-1.fc11 unalz(x86-64) = 0.64-1.fc11 = libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:45:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141945.n1EJjBKJ023453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141944.n1EJiq3L023105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #31 from MERCIER 2009-02-14 14:44:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdesklet-SlideShow Short Description: A slideshow of collection for gdesklets Owners: bioinfornatics at gmail.com Branches: F9 F10 InitialCC: bioinfornatics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141947.n1EJlVLm023782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-14 14:47:31 EDT --- You should at least ask them and show them https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141953.n1EJrUF4024647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 14:53:29 EDT --- Few more notes: * No need to install %docs. It's enough to include them in %files, e.g. instead of mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/vgabios install -m 0644 README COPYING $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/vgabios ... %files ... %docdir %{_docdir}/vgabios/ %doc %{_docdir}/vgabios/README %doc %{_docdir}/vgabios/COPYING you should write only %files ... %doc README COPYING * Source0 file doesn't match one, shipped within srpm: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum vgabios-0.6.tgz ~/Desktop/vgabios-0.6b.tgz 35ddf3eaf16abe546797ae9cc18cbd6e vgabios-0.6.tgz 36399621c4d6753e83a3cec3009c7183 /home/petro/Desktop/vgabios-0.6b.tgz [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ Generally, it's not a problem if you need to ship different (from upstream) source, but in case then you *really* need to modify upstream sources (or even create tarball from VCS), you *must* provide instructions on how to create exact the same source file in comments to your spec-file. See this spec-file as an example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flashrom/devel/flashrom.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 19:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902141958.n1EJwVSk025402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #4 from Armin 2009-02-14 14:58:30 EDT --- add %defattr to the three %files sections following %files common. deps I got here: - intltool - libwnck-devel - many more... build it with mock: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock and you have to add a version to your last changelog. (non of your changelogs have versions =S ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 20:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142023.n1EKN1Gg011839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-14 15:23:00 EDT --- Ok, let's assume that you (or something else) already packaged fcode and you added proper BuildRequires into spec-file. Notes: * %prep section contains leftover (ls command) * This package must be marked as noarch * The same issue with %docs as in bz#485418 * I still think that shipping pre-build firmware is a bad idea. What prevents us to build them all from source on every arch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 20:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] New: Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 Summary: Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/netactview_review/netactview.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/netactview_review/netactview-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Netactview is a graphical network connections viewer for Linux, similar in functionality with Netstat. It includes features like process information, host name retrieval, automatic refresh and sorting. It has a fully featured GTK 2 graphical interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 21:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142103.n1EL34me018723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-14 16:03:03 EDT --- Okay, I will drop the doc package and corerct my install argument and use the original pkgconfig location, but 1) why %check? 2) Timestamps [cassmodiah at schafwiese Desktop]$ LC_ALL=C wget -N http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libwps/libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz --2009-02-13 18:21:12-- http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libwps/libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz Resolving downloads.sourceforge.net... 216.34.181.60 Connecting to downloads.sourceforge.net|216.34.181.60|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found Location: http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/libwps/libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz [following] --2009-02-13 18:21:13-- http://mesh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/libwps/libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz Resolving mesh.dl.sourceforge.net... 213.203.218.122 Connecting to mesh.dl.sourceforge.net|213.203.218.122|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found Location: http://213.203.218.125/l/li/libwps/libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz [following] --2009-02-13 18:21:13-- http://213.203.218.125/l/li/libwps/libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz Connecting to 213.203.218.125:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 413360 (404K) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz' 100%[======================================>] 413,360 320K/s in 1.3s Last-modified header missing -- time-stamps turned off. 2009-02-13 18:21:14 (320 KB/s) - `libwps-0.1.2.tar.gz' saved [413360/413360] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 21:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142151.n1ELpOKV012392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-14 16:51:24 EDT --- > I will drop the doc package Why? You don't build --without-docs. It is due to a packaging mistake in your spec file that the html docs are lost. They get installed (see build.log), but you overwrite the installed files with your %doc entries. Examine a -bi --short-circuit install with an empty %files list if you don't believe me. > why %check? To run the unittests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 21:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142149.n1ELnS5V026827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #9 from Eric Sandeen 2009-02-14 16:49:26 EDT --- Ok, I'll take this one. Clearing the needsponsor blocker. I'll take a look at the proposed spec & srpm this weekend if I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 21:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142158.n1ELwgk8013544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #2 from leigh scott 2009-02-14 16:58:41 EDT --- You will also need to add. BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 21:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142157.n1ELvUJQ013416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #1 from leigh scott 2009-02-14 16:57:29 EDT --- 1. You need to validate the desktop file. i.e desktop-file-install --vendor "" --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}-manager.desktop http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop 2. The summary is very vague and doesn't describe the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 22:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142203.n1EM36M1029430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Eric Sandeen 2009-02-14 17:03:05 EDT --- Hm, COPYING-2 in the tarball says: ======== The set of programs and documentation known as "lmbench" are distributed under the Free Software Foundation's General Public License with the following additional restrictions (which override any conflicting restrictions in the GPL): 1. You may not distribute results in any public forum, in any publication, or in any other way if you have modified the benchmarks. 2. You may not distribute the results for a fee of any kind. This includes web sites which generate revenue from advertising. If you have modifications or enhancements that you wish included in future versions, please mail those to me, Larry McVoy, at lm at bitmover.com. ======== spot, can we ship this? Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 22:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142212.n1EMClSW031435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kevinverma at fedora |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c |project.org) |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 22:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485586] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485586 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Kwalitee/perl-Test-Kwalitee.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Kwalitee/perl-Test-Kwalitee-1.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Kwalitee is an automatically-measurable gauge of how good your software is. That's very different from quality, which a computer really can't measure in a general sense. (If you can, you've solved a hard problem in computer science.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 22:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142251.n1EMpdwa023069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #3 from leigh scott 2009-02-14 17:51:38 EDT --- Doesn't screenlets need to own the directories . /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets /usr/share/screenlets and /usr/share/screenlets-manager http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 23:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142303.n1EN3HNn025215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bioinfornatics at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from MERCIER 2009-02-14 18:03:16 EDT --- what's the rpmlint issue: rpmlint /home/builder/SPEC/objcryst-fox.spec rpmlint /home/builder/SRPMS/objcryst-fox-1.8.0.3-1.fc10.debroglie.src.rpm rpmlint /home/builder/RPMS/.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 14 23:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902142352.n1ENqIHt016992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #5 from Feng Yu 2009-02-14 18:52:16 EDT --- I don't have sufficient harddisk for doing mock. I'll post the updated srpm + spec files for 0.7.4 once it is released. But would you take a look into this template file? http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/source/browse/trunk/gnome-globalmenu.spec.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 00:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477106] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150053.n1F0r5Q1027660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477106 Changwoo Ryu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwryu at debian.org --- Comment #2 from Changwoo Ryu 2009-02-14 19:53:04 EDT --- Now that web page does not refer the non-free "freeware license" (which was actually for win32 exe file distribution) anymore. And new version 0.64 has zlib-license permission notices in the source code, though some files still lack them. IMO that ambigously linked piece of text in the homepage is not a clear sign of non-freeness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 02:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] New: Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Summary: Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josephsmidt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/phoronix-test-suite.spec SRPM URL: http://josephsmidt.googlepages.com/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: Hello. This is my first attempt at a Fedora package! The Phoronix Test Suite is on the package wishlist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive testing and benchmarking platform available for Linux and is designed to carry out qualitative and quantitative benchmarks in a clean, reproducible, and easy-to-use manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 04:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459945] Review Request: pfstmo - PFS tone mapping operators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150434.n1F4YQ1s017704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459945 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 04:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150438.n1F4cxYU018491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 Bug 477545 depends on bug 477544, which changed state. Bug 477544 Summary: Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 04:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150439.n1F4d0Wl018516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 Bug 477546 depends on bug 477544, which changed state. Bug 477544 Summary: Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 04:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477544] Review Request: libpcapnav - Wrapper library for libpcap offering navigation inside of a tracefile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150438.n1F4cwfb018467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477544 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-14 23:38:57 EDT --- seems that the package has been built for quite some time. closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 04:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477546] Review Request: netdude - Inspection, analysis and manipulation of tcpdump trace files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150439.n1F4dhHT001301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477546 Bug 477546 depends on bug 477545, which changed state. Bug 477545 Summary: Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 04:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477545] Review Request: libnetdude - Management framework for pcap packet traces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150439.n1F4dgOD001273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477545 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-14 23:39:41 EDT --- seems that the package has been built for quite some time. closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 05:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150539.n1F5dXsT011738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-15 00:39:32 EDT --- some deps are still missing: # reviewtool setup couldn't load Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status: Could not load class (Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Bugzilla) because : Could not load class (Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::MooseX::MultiInitArg::Trait) because : Can't locate Moose/Meta/Attribute/Custom/Trait/MooseX/MultiInitArg/Trait.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin/../lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/Class/MOP.pm line 151. triggered from: Class::MOP::load_first_existing_class('Moose::Meta::Attribute::Custom::Trait::MooseX::MultiInitArg::...', 'MooseX::MultiInitArg::Trait') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Util.pm line 143 Moose::Util::resolve_metaclass_alias('Attribute', 'MooseX::MultiInitArg::Trait', 'trait', 1) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Util.pm line 123 Moose::Util::resolve_metatrait_alias('Attribute', 'MooseX::MultiInitArg::Trait') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Meta/Attribute.pm line 116 Moose::Meta::Attribute::interpolate_class('Moose::Meta::Attribute', 'predicate', 'has_id', 'builder', '_build_id', 'isa', 'Int', 'clear_on', 'data', ...) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Meta/Attribute.pm line 86 Moose::Meta::Attribute::interpolate_class_and_new('Moose::Meta::Attribute', 'id', 'predicate', 'has_id', 'builder', '_build_id', 'isa', 'Int', 'clear_on', ...) called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Moose/Meta/Class.pm line 510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 05:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485586] Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150554.n1F5s9E9014403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485586 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-15 00:54:08 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 8f99765f3a5e563b50638d082b90e6129d6fee7a Test-Kwalitee-1.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 06:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150616.n1F6G3pW003295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 --- Comment #13 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-02-15 01:16:01 EDT --- This typo is still presnet in stable package and why this bug is still not closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 06:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150621.n1F6LKi4004347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 01:21:18 EDT --- I guess trying pre-review is much easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 06:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150636.n1F6a5F1006962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 06:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 01:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150635.n1F6ZqxG006827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-15 01:35:51 EDT --- The desktop files needs a couple of cosmetic fixes, because the Categories tag should not contain X-Fedora and Application any more. Therefore please drop --add-category X-Fedora and add instead --remove-category=Application Bonus points for adding chmod -x src/*{h,c) thus silencing rpmlint when looking at the debuginfo file: rpmlint of netactview-debuginfo: netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/main.c netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/net.h netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/net.c netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/mainwindow.c netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/process.c netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/utils.c netactview-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/netactview-0.4.1/src/process.h For the moment you have duplicate BuildRequires: pkgconfig (by glib-devel), gnome-vfs2-devel (by libgnome-devel) and glib-devel (by gtk+-devel). This is purely cosmetic and I will not complain if you want to keep it as it is. And last but not last, I have contacted the author in private and asked him to include license info in all the source files. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type per spec: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: af60909095f5150e70fdec778cfdcb3edf1438b5 netactview-0.4.1.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. =>see preamble [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F10/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. Fix the issues mentioned in Preamble (notably the desktop) and I will gladly approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 07:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150715.n1F7FOS0029164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #10 from Brennan Ashton 2009-02-15 02:15:22 EDT --- I am wrapping up some other projects early this week, and will get some of my packages reviews such as this one updated. I am removing the NEEDSPONSOR tag, as I have been sponsored for a while now. Thomas, are you wanting to co-maintain or something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 07:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] New: Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Summary: Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/gigolo/gigolo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/gigolo/gigolo-0.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A frontend to easily manage connections to remote filesystems using GIO/GVFS. It allows you to quickly connect/mount a remote filesystem and manage bookmarks of such. NOTE: This is a rename of the 'sion' package. Upstream renamed it. See bug 478655 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 08:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150850.n1F8oT6b029891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 03:50:28 EDT --- - By the way how we can check if the binary part in waf script file are under FOSS license? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 08:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] New: Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Summary: Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josephsmidt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/SciTools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/SciTools-0.4-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: SciTools is a Python package containing lots of useful tools for scientific computing in Python. The package is built on top of other widely used packages such as NumPy, SciPy, ScientificPython, Gnuplot, etc. Webpage: http://code.google.com/p/scitools/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 08:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150847.n1F8lo5E012053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 03:47:49 EDT --- I guess I don't have time to review this, however * Please make the build log more verbose so we can check if Fedora specific compiler flags are correctly honored. - Usually the output like ---------------------------------------------------------------- + ./waf build [ 1/20] cc: src/main.c -> _build_/default/src/main_1.o [ 2/20] cc: src/compat.c -> _build_/default/src/compat_1.o [ 3/20] cc: src/window.c -> _build_/default/src/window_1.o [ 4/20] cc: src/bookmark.c -> _build_/default/src/bookmark_1.o ---------------------------------------------------------------- is not useful. - And actually ps auwwx shows ---------------------------------------------------------------- 8626 pts/15 S+ 0:00 /bin/sh -e /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/INSTROOT/rpm-tmp.KdfCEV 8651 pts/15 Sl+ 0:00 python ./waf build 8696 pts/15 S+ 0:00 /usr/bin/gcc -g -O0 -DDEBUG -Idefault -I.. -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 ../src/common.c -c -o default/src/common_1.o ---------------------------------------------------------------- so Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. - Would you explain why this package does not Provide sion despite that this Obsoletes sion? - --vendor="fedora" should not be used anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 09:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150937.n1F9bwpv022912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #49 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-15 04:37:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331958) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331958) Patch from current ghc-X11.spec to the new templates. I ported ghc-X11.spec to the new templates, here's the diff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 09:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902150959.n1F9xO0r026385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 10:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151018.n1FAIuZj030507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #2 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 05:18:55 EDT --- I have applied these changes that you recommended. > --add-category X-Fedora > and add instead > --remove-category=Application > > Bonus points for adding > chmod -x src/*{h,c} Spec URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/netactview_review/new_1/netactview.spec SRPM URL: http://dnmouse.org/fedora/netactview_review/new_1/netactview-0.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Thank you for reviewing the package. Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 10:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151031.n1FAViHH017569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-15 05:31:43 EDT --- - Name should be scitools, not SciTools. * You need to change also "setup -q" to "setup -q -n SciTools-%{version}" - Double Requires: gnuplot, remove the latter one. - Missing BuildRequires: python-devel - Missing python_sitelib macro, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python - Install section should be %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__python} setup.py install --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Files should be %{python_sitelib}/*egg-info %{python_sitelib}/%{name} instead of %{_libdir}/* as the latter version would own system directories, and doesn't work on 64-bit architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 10:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151045.n1FAjKNZ020166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-15 05:45:18 EDT --- - Missing Requires: ScientificPython. - Actually you don't need Requires: gnuplot at all, since gnuplot-py already pulls in gnuplot. - I'd only Requires: numpy, scipy, ScientificPython and gnuplot-py for the base package, and branch the other suggested requirements into an -extras package. At the moment it would pull in python-numeric, python-numarray, vtk-python, python-matplotlib, PyX, veusz (and the rest of the suggested requirements once they get into Fedora). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 10:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151050.n1FAo1qI003834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-15 05:50:00 EDT --- I don't think I can accept the package even after the aforementioned modifications, since there are files in %{_bindir} that probably shouldn't be there. Also most of them have really general names, which may clash with other packages. /usr/bin/_gnuplot.py /usr/bin/_gnuplot.pyc /usr/bin/_gnuplot.pyo /usr/bin/file2interactive.py /usr/bin/file2interactive.pyc /usr/bin/file2interactive.pyo /usr/bin/floatdiff.py /usr/bin/floatdiff.pyc /usr/bin/floatdiff.pyo /usr/bin/floatdiff.verify /usr/bin/gnuplot.bat /usr/bin/hgtools.py /usr/bin/hgtools.pyc /usr/bin/hgtools.pyo /usr/bin/profiler.py /usr/bin/profiler.pyc /usr/bin/profiler.pyo /usr/bin/ps2mpeg.py /usr/bin/ps2mpeg.pyc /usr/bin/ps2mpeg.pyo /usr/bin/pyreport /usr/bin/regression.py /usr/bin/regression.pyc /usr/bin/regression.pyo /usr/bin/subst.py /usr/bin/subst.pyc /usr/bin/subst.pyo /usr/bin/timer.py /usr/bin/timer.pyc /usr/bin/timer.pyo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 11:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] New: Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 Summary: Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pygrace.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pygrace-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for grace, based on Nathan Gray's gracePlot. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128032 rpmlint output: pygrace.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pygrace/grace_np.py 0644 pygrace.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pygrace/__init__.py 0644 pygrace.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pygrace/pygrace.py 0644 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 11:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151153.n1FBrZit015916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-15 06:53:34 EDT --- package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 12:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151211.n1FCBowk019770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 07:11:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netactview Short Description: Graphical network connections viewer for Linux Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 12:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151234.n1FCYbNw023674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-15 07:34:36 EDT --- There are some rpmlint error [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint pdumpfs* pdumpfs.i386: E: no-binary pdumpfs-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. noarch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 13:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485621] New: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-build.log Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128243 Description: This module allows you to use the Mozilla embedding widget from Perl. --- rpmlint output : perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.src: I: checking perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: I: checking perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/MozEmbed/Install/gtkmozembed2perl.h perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/MozEmbed/Install/gtkmozembed2perl-autogen.h perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. no -devel package seems ok according to perl Guidelines This package is needed for gmusicbrowser (comming soon for review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 13:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151320.n1FDKIbe032523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 13:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151318.n1FDIdfW031951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-15 08:18:36 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gpscorrelate-1.5.8-1.tillf8.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint gpscorrelate* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 99e61153ac1245955e780298a6125130 Build source: 99e61153ac1245955e780298a6125130 [-] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128230 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format Is there a reason why RELEASES and README are not included in %doc? Beside the %doc stuff I see no further blocker, package APPROVED. The usage of 'redhat-starthere' is a bit problematic but I guess that if the icon is missing there is no icon showing up in menu. Let's wait for the icon from the ArtTeam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 13:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151330.n1FDUNCJ002083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #4 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-02-15 08:30:22 EDT --- Do you mean screenlets package doesn't need to own the following directories: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets /usr/share/screenlets /usr/share/screenlets-manager ? Is it ok to have unowned directories? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151429.n1FETHcc014589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 09:29:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Do you mean screenlets package doesn't need to own the following directories: > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets > /usr/share/screenlets > /usr/share/screenlets-manager > ? Is it ok to have unowned directories? A package should own any directory it creates. i.e %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING DEVELOPERS LICENCE README TODO %{_bindir}/screenlets %{_bindir}/screenlets-daemon %{_bindir}/screenlets-manager %{_bindir}/screenlets-packager %{_bindir}/screenletsd %dir %{python_sitelib}/screenlets %{python_sitelib}/screenlets/* %{python_sitelib}/screenlets-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info %{_datadir}/applications/screenlets-manager.desktop %{_datadir}/icons/screenlets.svg %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets-manager %{_datadir}/screenlets-manager/* %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets %{_datadir}/screenlets/* Also I made a mistake on the desktop-file-install, it should be desktop-file-install --vendor "" --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}-manager.desktop I also believe the path in Icon= should be removed along with the .svg Icon=/usr/share/icons/screenlets.svg should be Icon=screenlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485586] Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151433.n1FEXuAm015544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485586 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-15 09:33:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Kwalitee Short Description: Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:39:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151439.n1FEdQ34032687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 09:39:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331971) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331971) patch to compile 0.4.5 rc1 with ppc For 0.4.5-0.1.rc1: * Missing BuildRequires - This srpm does not build on dist-f10-updates-candidate without "BR: dbus-devel" due to packaging bug in *ORBit2-devel*. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1127627 * ppc build failure - 0.4.5 rc1 won't build at least on ppc, because of using x86 specific assembler codes (in src/utils.h). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1127604 A patch to revert the use of these assembler codes (to what is used in 0.4.4) is attached. Would you submit both 2 patches to the upstream? (we won't have to wait for upstream's response for this review request, however it is desirable that these patches are applied in the upstream) * %changelog ------------------------------------------------------------ * Sun Feb 15 2009 Liang Suilong 0.4.5-1.rc1 ------------------------------------------------------------ - The last should be "0.4.5-0.1.rc1". Then I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151440.n1FEeaFV000669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-15 09:40:35 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [?] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint fsarchiver-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint fsarchiver* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: f7546bbbe4d71fe600b5e93a90def948 Build source: f7546bbbe4d71fe600b5e93a90def948 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128367 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format The description needs some love from my point of view. Why not take the description from the README file. FSArchiver is a system tool that allows you to save the contents of a file-system to a compressed archive file. The file-system can be restored on a partition which has a different size and it can be restored on a different file-system. Unlike tar/dar, FSArchiver also creates the file-system when it extracts the data to partitions. Everything is checksummed in the archive in order to protect the data. If the archive is corrupt, you just loose the current file, not the whole archive. I see no further blocker, package APPROVED. Please fix the description before you import the package into the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151442.n1FEgfet001114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 09:42:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > * Missing BuildRequires > - This srpm does not build on dist-f10-updates-candidate without > "BR: dbus-devel" due to packaging bug in *ORBit2-devel*. due to packaging bug in *GConf2-devel*, sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151450.n1FEoVJo002728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #6 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-02-15 09:50:30 EDT --- Ok, I'm on the way to fix the desktop file. Sorry to ask again, it's not clear for me, the documentation here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories says: %{_datadir}/foo/* This includes everything _in_ "foo", but not "foo" itself. "rpm -qlv pkgname" will show a missing drwxr-xr-x entry for "foo". Correct would be: %{_datadir}/foo/ to include the directory _and_ the entire tree below it. And rpm -qplv screenlets-0.1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm already lists this directories ... drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 f?vr. 15 15:38 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets ... drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 f?vr. 15 15:38 /usr/share/screenlets drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 f?vr. 15 15:38 /usr/share/screenlets-manager ... What am I missing? Can a directory be in the listing but still be unowned? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151454.n1FEsxK0003436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 09:54:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > %files -f %{name}.lang > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING DEVELOPERS LICENCE README TODO > %{_bindir}/screenlets > %{_bindir}/screenlets-daemon > %{_bindir}/screenlets-manager > %{_bindir}/screenlets-packager > %{_bindir}/screenletsd > %dir %{python_sitelib}/screenlets > %{python_sitelib}/screenlets/* > %{python_sitelib}/screenlets-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info > %{_datadir}/applications/screenlets-manager.desktop > %{_datadir}/icons/screenlets.svg > %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets-manager > %{_datadir}/screenlets-manager/* > %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets > %{_datadir}/screenlets/* ---------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets %{_datadir}/screenlets/* ---------------------------------------------------- equals ---------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/screenlets/ ---------------------------------------------------- The latter format contains the directory %{_datadir}/screenlets and all files/directories/etc under %{_datadir}/screenlets. Also for this package ---------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{python_sitelib}/screenlets %{python_sitelib}/screenlets/* %{python_sitelib}/screenlets-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info ---------------------------------------------------- can be unified to ---------------------------------------------------- %{python_sitelib}/* ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151456.n1FEuO79020080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-15 09:56:23 EDT --- 404 while trying to download Source0 from SF. Please provide spec file with such obvious issues fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:59:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151459.n1FExrUK004534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 09:59:52 EDT --- (and also note that rawhide uses python 2.6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151501.n1FF1acB005255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #9 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 10:01:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > %files -f %{name}.lang > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING DEVELOPERS LICENCE README TODO > > %{_bindir}/screenlets > > %{_bindir}/screenlets-daemon > > %{_bindir}/screenlets-manager > > %{_bindir}/screenlets-packager > > %{_bindir}/screenletsd > > %dir %{python_sitelib}/screenlets > > %{python_sitelib}/screenlets/* > > %{python_sitelib}/screenlets-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info > > %{_datadir}/applications/screenlets-manager.desktop > > %{_datadir}/icons/screenlets.svg > > %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets-manager > > %{_datadir}/screenlets-manager/* > > %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets > > %{_datadir}/screenlets/* > > ---------------------------------------------------- > %files > %dir %{_datadir}/screenlets > %{_datadir}/screenlets/* > ---------------------------------------------------- > equals > ---------------------------------------------------- > %{_datadir}/screenlets/ > ---------------------------------------------------- > > The latter format contains the directory %{_datadir}/screenlets > and all files/directories/etc under %{_datadir}/screenlets. > > Also for this package > ---------------------------------------------------- > %files > %dir %{python_sitelib}/screenlets > %{python_sitelib}/screenlets/* > %{python_sitelib}/screenlets-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info > ---------------------------------------------------- > can be unified to > ---------------------------------------------------- > %{python_sitelib}/* > ---------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 14:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151459.n1FEx8bv020499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151500.n1FF0D2N020933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-15 10:00:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The description needs some love from my point of view. Why not take the > description from the README file. > > FSArchiver is a system tool that allows you to save the contents of a > file-system to a compressed archive file. The file-system can be restored > on a partition which has a different size and it can be restored on a > different file-system. Unlike tar/dar, FSArchiver also creates the > file-system when it extracts the data to partitions. Everything is > checksummed in the archive in order to protect the data. If the archive > is corrupt, you just loose the current file, not the whole archive. > > I see no further blocker, package APPROVED. Please fix the description before > you import the package into the cvs. Agreed, fixed in 0.4.1-2. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151506.n1FF6vB6022137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #10 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-02-15 10:06:56 EDT --- So here are the new files. SPEC: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets.spec SRPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm btw, I use desktop-file-validate instead of desktop-file-install because the desktop file is already installed in the good place. Is it ok? I also add some french translation in the desktop file, do I have the right to do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151502.n1FF277v021414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-15 10:02:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fsarchiver Short Description: Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool Owners: drago01 Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151526.n1FFQtEO025242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-15 10:26:55 EDT --- I forgot to say that a new srpm and spec are available at: SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/~dseketel/rpms/geglmm/geglmm-0.0.22-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/~dseketel/rpms/geglmm/geglmm.spec-0.0.22-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151523.n1FFN2qe024546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 --- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-15 10:23:02 EDT --- {?dist} macro: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Done. > - Source0 must be given with full URL: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Done. > > - gegl-devel Requires babl-devel, so "BuildRequires: babl-devel" > is redundant. I Removed babl-devel. > - Usually the dependencies between binary rpms rebuilt from > a srpm must be EVR (not just version) specific. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package Done. > - This srpm won't build on dist-f11: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1126647 > Ah. It builds on f10 that's why I didn't notice that. I will now use mock. So I did a patch to fix this issue. The patch has been submitted upstream. While at it, I produced another patchlet to kill some warnings. That patch has been submitted upstream as well. > - We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Done. > - Please consider to add the following files > ------------------------------------------------------------ > AUTHORS > COPYING > COPYING.LESSER > ------------------------------------------------------------ > to main package and > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ChangeLog > ------------------------------------------------------------ > to -devel package. > Done. Thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151557.n1FFvNxx014072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 10:57:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > So here are the new files. > SPEC: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets.spec > SRPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm > RPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm > > btw, I use desktop-file-validate instead of desktop-file-install because the > desktop file is already installed in the good place. Is it ok? I believe it is acceptable to use desktop-file-validate. > > I also add some french translation in the desktop file, do I have the right to > do that? I not sure. The summary is better, but still needs to be shorter. [leigh at localhost Download]$ rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Download/screenlets-0.1.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm' screenlets.noarch: I: checking screenlets.noarch: E: summary-too-long Screenlets are fully themeable mini-apps that improve the usability and eye-candy of the modern composited Linux-desktop The "Summary:" must not exceed 79 characters. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [leigh at localhost Download]$ rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Download/screenlets-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm' screenlets.src: I: checking screenlets.src: E: summary-too-long Screenlets are fully themeable mini-apps that improve the usability and eye-candy of the modern composited Linux-desktop The "Summary:" must not exceed 79 characters. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [leigh at localhost Download]$ This bit is wrong Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 You must use a full URL to the package in the SourceX: line. i.e Source0: http://code.launchpad.net/screenlets/trunk/0.1.2/+download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 15:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151558.n1FFwwhV030252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #12 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 10:58:57 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 16:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151611.n1FGBNAT016592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 11:11:22 EDT --- Okay. - I recommend to use %{version} in Source0 ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D If you want to change, please fix this when importing into Fedora CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (geglmm) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 16:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:12:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151612.n1FGCLTL016757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-15 11:12:20 EDT --- Now approving. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (cloog) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 16:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151621.n1FGLShS002065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 --- Comment #8 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-15 11:21:27 EDT --- If this has been built, and pushed to stable this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 16:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151621.n1FGLB6b002014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 --- Comment #11 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-15 11:21:10 EDT --- If this has been built, and pushed to stable this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 16:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151622.n1FGM5vt002198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 --- Comment #12 from Brian Pepple 2009-02-15 11:22:04 EDT --- If this has been built, and pushed to stable this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 17:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151715.n1FHFp7R026734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 17:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151714.n1FHEwtB010055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 17:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151718.n1FHI4dV010965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #30 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-15 12:18:03 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 17:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151721.n1FHLvxO011753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-15 12:21:56 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 17:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151721.n1FHLL63011679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #31 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-15 12:21:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cloog Short Description: The Chunky Loop Generator Owners: dodji Branches: F-10 InitialCC: dodji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 17:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151723.n1FHNH1r011908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 --- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-15 12:23:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geglmm Short Description: A graphic processing library, C++ bindings Owners: dodji Branches: F-10 InitialCC: dodji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151809.n1FI9qxA003535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #4 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-02-15 13:09:52 EDT --- You're right, noarch solved it. I have noticed that Fedora's RPMs looks much better built than CentOS's. Do you think so? SPEC: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/pdumpfs/1.3-3/pdumpfs.spec SRPM: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/pdumpfs/1.3-3/pdumpfs-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:24:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151824.n1FIOTVY022345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #23 from Jose Luis 2009-02-15 13:24:28 EDT --- My other submission, "cutecom": https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151826.n1FIQV6I022914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #24 from Jose Luis 2009-02-15 13:26:31 EDT --- And this is the new review of MRPT: SPEC: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.5-0.1.20090213.fc10.src.rpm Apart from the issues you detected, these are the additional changes: * Sat Feb 13 2009 - Jose Luis Blanco 0.6.5-0.1.20090213 - New upstream sources. - Individual packages created for each MRPT application. - Removed unneeded dependencies from -devel package. - Fixed "doc" package should own the mrpt-doc directory. - Mime types moved to mrpt-core package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] New: Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Summary: Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joseluisblancoc at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/cutecom.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/cutecom-0.20.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CuteCom is a graphical serial terminal, like minicom or Hyperterminal on Windows. It is aimed mainly at hardware developers or other people who need a terminal to talk to their devices. It is free software and distributed under the GNU General Public License Version 2, which can find in the file COPYING. It is written using the Qt library by Trolltech. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] New: Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Summary: Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: appolito2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-3.9-1.src.rpm Description: Dynamic menu is a generic menu for X, originally designed for dwm. It manages huge amounts (up to 10.000 and more) of user defined menu items efficiently. rpmlint output: 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. mock build log: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/build.log Please note that this is my first fedora package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 18:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151845.n1FIjIgo010118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jan Blazek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151903.n1FJ3S6R013535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #4 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-15 14:03:27 EDT --- Thank you for taking the time to review this package. I have made the changes you have requested. The new package is found here: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-0.1.fc10.src.rpm By your last comment, are you saying scitools is a lost cause? Did you want me to remove all files from %{_bindir} which are not executables? Should I move all the files in %{_bindir} to %{_bindir}/scitools? Should I try to rename the files? Is there anything you would suggest? Also, there was a directory full of examples I put in /usr/share/scitools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151916.n1FJGAAS032032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #13 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-02-15 14:16:09 EDT --- Ok, summary has been shorten (again) and source url fixed in this -3 release. Here are the new files. SPEC: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets.spec SRPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/screenlets-0.1.2-3.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] New: Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 Summary: Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/pdftk/pdftk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/pdftk/pdftk-1.41-7.fc10.src.rpm Description: If PDF is electronic paper, then pdftk is an electronic staple-remover, hole-punch, binder, secret-decoder-ring, and X-Ray-glasses. Pdftk is a simple tool for doing everyday things with PDF documents. Keep one in the top drawer of your desktop and use it to: * Merge PDF Documents * Split PDF Pages into a New Document * Decrypt Input as Necessary (Password Required) * Encrypt Output as Desired * Burst a PDF Document into Single Pages * Report on PDF Metrics, including Metadata and Bookmarks * Uncompress and Re-Compress Page Streams * Repair Corrupted PDF (Where Possible) Pdftk is also an example of how to use a library of Java classes in a stand-alone C++ program. Specifically, it demonstrates how GCJ and CNI allow C++ code to use iText's (itext-paulo) Java classes. Additional Information: This package was retiered from Fredora caused by licensing issues from the bundled iText library. Now we have a new iText library in the Fedora collection which doewn't has this licensing issues. So I have to wipe out the bundled iText library from pdftk and apply the patach provided by Andrew.Haley. Unfortunately, I will get the following issue during installing the package: $ export LANG="C"; rpm -i pdftk-1.41-6.fc10.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: /usr/lib64/gcj/itext/itext-2.1.4.jar.so()(64bit) is needed by pdftk-1.41-6.fc10.x86_64 But the /usr/lib64/gcj/itext/ directory contains the following files: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40960 Feb 12 21:29 itext-2.1.4.jar.db -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7122584 Feb 12 21:29 itext-2.1.4.jar.so It will be nice, if you have a hint to solve this issue. Perhaps someone has a hint to solve this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151951.n1FJpCZZ005502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2009-02-15 14:51:11 EDT --- Is there any need to add %post & %postun to update the icon cache ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151950.n1FJo3at005262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-15 14:50:03 EDT --- An additional change: It may be nice, if you can add the autoreconf command before the %configure statemant. The task of the autoreconf command is to make sure, that the configure.in file may be generated on the base of the configure.ac file, which will be patched by my suggested patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485642] New: Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485642 Summary: Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/FCGI-ProcManager OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-FCGI-ProcManager.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-FCGI-ProcManager-0.18-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: FCGI::ProcManager is used to serve as a FastCGI process manager. By reimplementing it in perl, developers can more finely tune performance in their web applications, and can take advantage of copy-on-write semantics prevalent in UNIX kernel process management. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128549 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151956.n1FJuMbe022204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller 2009-02-15 14:56:21 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] New: Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Summary: Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/django-authopenid/0.9.6-1/django-authopenid.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/django-authopenid/0.9.6-1/django-authopenid-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Django authentication application with OpenID using django.contrib.auth. This application allow a user to connect to you website with: * legacy account (username/password) * OpenID url If the user connects with an OpenID they could associate it with their legacy account or just create a new Django account. When the user is connected administrators can manage them like usual with django.contrib.auth. This application also provide views to: * change password * change account email * change associated openid * delete account * send a new password Source produced By Beno?t Chesneau for Enki Multimedia for the Friendsnippets project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 19:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902151958.n1FJwJSi006449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-15 14:58:18 EDT --- for #4 i try your patch: http://svn.calcforge.org/viewvc/fedora/nsis/nsis-2.34-RPM_OPT_FLAGS.diff?revision=2&root=repo-specfiles but for me it's not working ie it's also gives stack protector option for crosscompiler:-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152005.n1FK5OEA023841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-15 15:05:23 EDT --- Good: + Package use opengl-wrapper Bad: - The fonts Requires should be: devel dejavu-sans-fonts F-10: dejavu-fonts-sans F-9: dejavu-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152006.n1FK6NRl008252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause 2009-02-15 15:06:21 EDT --- Based on Pauls work I've created an updated package which addresses all mentioned issues: - build problem - RPM_OPT_FLAGS not honored Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities-20070815-3.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities.spec The package builds successfully in F10 and F11 on the 4 default architectures: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128542 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128537 I'm looking forward to the next review cycle. It would be great if the package could be included into Fedora soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152011.n1FKBAFB024839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-15 15:11:09 EDT --- > I'd expand the summary somewhat mh, if you don't know what tor is, you won't understand vidalia. so i think this is not necessary okay %cmake will make it easy :-) hope i got the trick > Also, the .desktop file mentions QT which you have to change to Qt. And the > .desktop file does not have different translations (I'm being really picky > here, but don't worry about it!). I added a German Translation, thats the only language I know Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/vidalia-0.1.10/vidalia.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/vidalia-0.1.10/vidalia-0.1.10-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152009.n1FK95tl008540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-15 15:09:01 EDT --- Hello, Just as an update, I have been trying to package 5.22.00. since that is the latest stable version. The problem has been I can't get it to build. I have borrowed from Juan's .spec above. I will be borrowing more once I see what new files, etc... are installed with the new release. If anyone has a suggestion how I can get this to build, I will be grateful: Spec: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/ROOT.spec Source: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/root_v5.22.00.source.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152010.n1FKAsVj009121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-15 15:10:52 EDT --- # rpmlint mingw32-nsis.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + OK - Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [/] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %i install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [/] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. =================================================== The package mingw32-nsis is approved by lfarkas =================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152021.n1FKL7ls026524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-02-15 15:21:07 EDT --- Please, excuse me for long delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152018.n1FKIZGQ025873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-15 15:18:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwps-0.1.2/libwps.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwps-0.1.2/libwps-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm i hope this will do the trick :-) without %check make check it doesn't work for me http://fpaste.org/paste/3724 line 803-841 # Fehler: # cppunit/CompilerOutputter.h: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden # test.cpp:38: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:38: Fehler: expected `{' before ?TestFixture? # test.cpp:38: Fehler: Funktionsdefinition deklariert keine Parameter # test.cpp:53: Fehler: invalid use of incomplete type ?class Test? # test.cpp:38: Fehler: forward declaration of ?class Test? # test.cpp:61: Fehler: invalid use of incomplete type ?class Test? # test.cpp:38: Fehler: forward declaration of ?class Test? # test.cpp:66: Fehler: invalid use of incomplete type ?class Test? # test.cpp:38: Fehler: forward declaration of ?class Test? # test.cpp:207: Fehler: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ?;? token # test.cpp: In function ?int main(int, char**)?: # test.cpp:212: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:212: Fehler: expected `;' before ?controller? # test.cpp:215: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:215: Fehler: expected `;' before ?result? # test.cpp:216: Fehler: ?controller? wurde in diesem G?ltigkeitsbereich nicht definiert # test.cpp:216: Fehler: ?result? wurde in diesem G?ltigkeitsbereich nicht definiert # test.cpp:219: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:219: Fehler: expected `;' before ?progress? # test.cpp:220: Fehler: ?progress? wurde in diesem G?ltigkeitsbereich nicht definiert # test.cpp:223: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:223: Fehler: expected `;' before ?runner? # test.cpp:224: Fehler: ?runner? wurde in diesem G?ltigkeitsbereich nicht definiert # test.cpp:224: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:228: Fehler: ?CPPUNIT_NS? wurde nicht deklariert # test.cpp:228: Fehler: expected `;' before ?outputter? # test.cpp:229: Fehler: ?outputter? wurde in diesem G?ltigkeitsbereich nicht definiert # make[1]: # *** [test.o] Fehler 1 # make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/test' # make: # *** [check] Fehler 2 # Fehler: # Fehler beim Bauen des RPM: # Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YL5rL9 (%check) # Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YL5rL9 (%check) # Child returncode was: 1 can we leave %check out? it looks like very "optional" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152020.n1FKKQKr010858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-02-15 15:20:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > How I should number its versions > > 0.9-1.1.CVS20080512 seems ok. No, duedlines say what CVS, not released versions must start from 0. I change it to 0.9-0.1.CVS20080512 enumeration. > I'd like to see the exact commands use to build the tarball, just above the > %source., p.e. (export greater than checkout) : > > # cvs -d :pserver:cvsread at cvs.php.net/repository export -D 2009-01-22 > pecl/runkit > # tar cjf runkit-CVS20090122.tar.bz2 -C pecl runkit > %Source0: %{peclName}-CVS%{CVS}.tar.bz2 Thank you, its done. > I have well understood than patches are for PHP ABI. > > Even if this package is unmaintained, please report the bug and post your > patch(es), it will be usefull for everyone, and probably commited (last commit > is only 5 weeks old on runkit.c). Ok - http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=15969 > I don't think restarting apache for each extension is a good idea. This should > probably be removed (Have to search about this in the Guidelines). I agree. This comes as legacy. Restart is removed. > Please : > - clean release (remove .Hu... and probably not usefull #*Hu comments) Done in release. In comments i think it is not necessary? > - update to a recent CVS snapshot Done. > - register the extension (package2.xml is included) Done. > - add PHP ABI check (see PHP Guidelines) Done. > - add upstream bug reference above %patch Done - http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=15969 > - use Fedora macros %pecl_xmldir, %php_extdir, %pecl_install, ... Done. > - clean $Revision and $Log cvs status lines (spec is quite obfuscated) Done. > - clean changelog (mainly % not acceptable) Done. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-runkit/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-0.6.CVS20090215.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152025.n1FKPJJj027192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #8 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-15 15:25:18 EDT --- opps i forget to add the koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152025.n1FKPCVP027150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lfarkas at lfarkas.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-15 15:25:10 EDT --- rpmlint /home/lfarkas/rpm/SRPMS/mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-2.fc10.src.rpm mingw32-nsiswrapper.src: W: strange-permission nsiswrapper.pl 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. so please change the permission to 0775. koji build ok: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128554 + OK - Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [/] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [/] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %i install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [/] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. =================================================== The package mingw32-nsiswrapper is approved by lfarkas =================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152026.n1FKQrp6011785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Ian Weller 2009-02-15 15:26:51 EDT --- == FULL REVIEW == [ OK ] specfiles match: fcb61fc7a2957865ab2b3e0f135eb732 trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.spec fcb61fc7a2957865ab2b3e0f135eb732 trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.spec.1 [FAILED] source files match upstream: I can't tell. The instructions included in the specfile to generate the tarball don't work. svn: '/svn/!svn/bc/5267/customfieldsadminplugin/0.10' path not found [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ N/A ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock. [ OK ] package installs properly. [ ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ OK ] rpmlint is silent. It did return: trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation trac-customfieldadmin-plugin.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/customfieldadmin/htdocs/js/CustomFieldAdminPage_actions.js but seeing how it didn't come with documentation and that Javascript files don't have shebangs, I'd ignore it. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ N/A ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ N/A ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ OK ] desktop files valid and installed properly. ------------------------------------------------------- I approve this package (trac-customfieldadmin-plugin) ------------------------------------------------------- (just be sure to check on the SVN instructions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152028.n1FKSGBP011959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-15 15:28:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/hosts3d-0.97/hosts3d.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/hosts3d-0.97/hosts3d-0.97-2.fc10.src.rpm done! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152038.n1FKcNg4013781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #28 from Ian Weller 2009-02-15 15:38:21 EDT --- I'm going to do a full rereview in about an hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460786] Review Request: mediawiki-Cite - An extension to provide Citation tools for Mediawiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152040.n1FKe965014219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460786 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller 2009-02-15 15:40:07 EDT --- I'm going to close this since it's available in F-10, devel, and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152043.n1FKhfnC030315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-15 15:43:39 EDT --- You're missing "BuildRequires: cppunit-devel" "check" is a top-level target in the Makefile. Among packagers, it's common practise to run such a testsuite, if available, and only ignore it if it's known to be out-of-date/broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 20:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152044.n1FKiqHG030442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-15 15:44:51 EDT --- Good: + autoconf was added as an BR. + autoreconf was called before %configure + Local build works fine + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + Start of the application works without a crash Bad: - Build fails on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128556 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 21:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152123.n1FLNnc5004180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-15 16:23:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > By your last comment, are you saying scitools is a lost cause? > Did you want me to remove all files from %{_bindir} which are not executables? > Should I move all the files in %{_bindir} to %{_bindir}/scitools? > Should I try to rename the files? > Is there anything you would suggest? > > Also, there was a directory full of examples I put in /usr/share/scitools. No, I suggest you contact upstream and ask them to correct the problem. Moving and/or renaming files should be done only after consultation, since this breaks compatibility with upstream. I'm not very familiar with Python, and so I don't know if the files need to be in %{_bindir}. My guess is, though, that they should be in the package's sitelib directory instead. I'd put the examples in the documentation, since people normally look there for documentation :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 21:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152122.n1FLM2lq004026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-15 16:22:01 EDT --- http://rafb.net/p/WgG5M476.html my local build log line 1416-1431 (in english this time, sorry for this german post above) cd src/test && make check make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/test' if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib/ -I/usr/include/libwpd-0.8 -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT test.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/test.Tpo" -c -o test.o test.cpp; \ then mv -f ".deps/test.Tpo" ".deps/test.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/test.Tpo"; exit 1; fi /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -I../../src/lib/ -I/usr/include/libwpd-0.8 -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o test -L../lib/ `cppunit-config --libs` test.o ../lib/libwps-0.1.la ../lib/libwps-stream-0.1.la -lwpd-0.8 mkdir .libs g++ -I../../src/lib/ -I/usr/include/libwpd-0.8 -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o .libs/test test.o -L/builddir/build/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/lib -lcppunit -ldl ../lib/.libs/libwps-0.1.so ../lib/.libs/libwps-stream-0.1.so -lwpd-0.8 creating test ./test /builddir/build/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/test/.libs/lt-test: error while loading shared libraries: libwps-0.1.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [check] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/test' make: *** [check] Error 2 RPM build errors: looks like make check will need the libwps package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 21:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152127.n1FLRS7O021545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-15 16:27:27 EDT --- The website refers to ARCS software homepage for license information. The tarfile contains no license, I asked upstream to add it in and clarify the license the software is under. The reply: "The license is here: http://dev.danse.us/trac/common/wiki/license and it's basically a BSD license, with a clause at the end that _encourages_ those who use packages developed in the DANSE project to credit us in their work." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 21:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152140.n1FLevss023879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #9 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-15 16:40:55 EDT --- Update for 1.8.3.2 : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/monkeystudio-1.8.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output : monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/Qt Form/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Console/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Console/$Project Name$.xpyqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Gui/$Form File Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Gui/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Gui/$Project Name$.xpyqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 14 warnings. All this warnings can be inored has they concerned template files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 22:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152216.n1FMGNJO029545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-15 17:16:22 EDT --- mh, he can't build it, because Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil detects a rpath and send me these to lines to fix that. sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool so I have to patch the makefile to handle %check? should i do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 22:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152257.n1FMvlOV019032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-15 17:57:46 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint pdumpfs-1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint pdumpfs-1.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: c1bb6514b3136854ca265913fd3765c9 Build source: c1bb6514b3136854ca265913fd3765c9 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128910 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format There is a translated man page (ja). Is there a reason why you didn't add this? If no, add the japanese man page before importing into the cvs. Beside that I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 23:15:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:15:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152315.n1FNFw3o022069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Bruno Mahe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bruno at gnoll.org) | --- Comment #18 from Bruno Mahe 2009-02-15 18:15:56 EDT --- The Extras directory is not really needed. It just provides some extras libraries. They are not required. I already have successfully compiled and linked some demos apps against the bullet libraries from the built rpm. I removed the Demos/, Extras/ and Glut/ directories from the source archive. But then it's not a pristine source anymore. Is it ok ? I added -DBUILD_DEMOS=OFF -DBUILD_EXTRAS=OFF to the %cmake command. I can successfully build packages locally and through koji (see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128897 for instance) See http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet-2.73-3.fc10.src.rpm and http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet.spec Could someone review it ? This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. Thanks, Bruno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 23:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152315.n1FNFV5D006427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kvolny at redhat.com Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 23:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485652] New: Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Summary: Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/navit.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/navit-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://navit.sourceforge.net/ Description: Navit is modular design is capable of using vector maps of various formats for routing and rendering of the displayed map. It's even possible to use multiple maps at a time. The GTK+ or SDL user interfaces are designed to work well with touch screen displays. Points of Interest of various formats are displayed on the map. The current vehicle position is either read from gpsd or directly from NMEA GPS sensors. The routing engine not only calculates an optimal route to your destination, but also generates directions and even speaks to you using speechd. rpmlint output (just to post some more information): [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint navit-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This package is not ready for a review because there are still some issues. Some persons offers their help and with a bug report we can better track the way to make navit work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 15 23:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902152346.n1FNkiuL027420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 --- Comment #2 from John Guthrie 2009-02-15 18:46:43 EDT --- There was a small error in the POD code for one of the perl module files. I have patched that and here is the new SRPM: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/perl-Sendmail-PMilter-0.96-5.fc10.src.rpm The new Spec file is still at the same URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 00:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160019.n1G0JDgK017839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #30 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-15 19:19:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331996) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331996) Suggested specfile fixes Full review: rpmlint is clean $ rpmlint . 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. %define _jdkdir %{_jvmdir}/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0 I suggest using simply %{_jvmdir}/java-1.6.0 instead, which will allow you to drop the JDK_DIR=`echo %{_jdkdir} | sed 's!/$!!'`.`uname -m` hack later (see attached patch). Is java-1.6 (not older and not newer) strictly required? Patch0: flexdock-jni-patch.patch + File file = new File("%{_libdir}/%{name}/");^ That '/' at the end is not necessary. Also the patch file name has a redundant 'patch' in it, same for others. BuildRequires: jpackage-utils is listed twice. #Override the build file's default hard-coded paths if [ x"$JAVACMD" != x"" ] ; then echo "using RPM jnidir" >> tmpLog echo sdk.home=%{_jnidir}-`$JAVACMD -version` > workingcopy.properties else if [ x"$JAVA_HOME" != x"" ] ; then echo "Using JAVA_HOME env. var. :" $JAVA_HOME >> tmpLog echo "sdk.home=$JAVA_HOME" > workingcopy.properties else JDK_DIR=%{_jdkdir} echo "Relying on spec file buildpath: $JDK_DIR " >> tmpLog echo "sdk.home=$JDK_DIR" > workingcopy.properties fi fi Why is the above necessary instead of: echo "sdk.home=%{_jvmdir}/java-1.6.0" > workingcopy.properties You could lose the %define _jdkdir at the beginning of the specfile then, too. Also see the attached patch for more cosmetic fixes. * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Most files have no licencing information while others are licenced under MIT licence. Given the presence of LICENSE.txt, this is OK, but please ask upstream to include licencing information at the top of each source file * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. #Licence is MIT on their website, Apache in their LICENSE.txt License: MIT and ASL 2.0 Wrong. LICENSE.txt is actually word-for-word MIT: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Modern_Style_with_sublicense * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. 88fd43d7d8db92e9480200c316e55056 flexdock-0.5.1-src.zip * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Doesn't build on F-9/x86_64 and F-9/i386 (java bug?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 00:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160045.n1G0jn3t005083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #5 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-15 19:45:48 EDT --- OK, upstream is very responsive, hence there is a new (pre)release with all the necessary licensing info: New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.4.rc8.fc10.src.rpm Moreover, the GCC 4.3 patch has been merged upstream and the rpmlint issue with executable stack has been also clarified, it is caused by a objdump call (details in specfile) and has been simply fixed by removing the flag using execstack. I've also split the plugins into a xmms-imms and audacious-plugins-imms subpackage. So this is now definitely ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 01:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160116.n1G1GvtL027693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-15 20:16:56 EDT --- Okay, I have contacted upstream. In the meantime I have added the -extras package and moved examples to the doc section. I took the dependencies for the extras package from your suggestions plus the packages mentioned on the website: http://code.google.com/p/scitools/wiki/Installation Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-0.2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 02:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:21:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160221.n1G2LAKr021792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-15 21:21:09 EDT --- BTW I don't see lowercase name in bugzilla though, is it intentional or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 03:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160322.n1G3M3J3000392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-15 22:22:02 EDT --- >I guess I don't have time to review this, however Thank you for your comments anyhow. >* Please make the build log more verbose so we can check > if Fedora specific compiler flags are correctly honored. ...snip... > so Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. I have done so in the new version. Thank you for spotting this issue. CFLAGS are now correctly using fedoras flags. >- Would you explain why this package does not Provide sion > despite that this Obsoletes sion? Well, I could do so, but this package has only been available for a short time in fedora. I don't think anyone would look for it under that name. I can do so, but not sure it would be worthwhile. >- --vendor="fedora" should not be used anymore. Removed. >- By the way how we can check if the binary part in waf > script file are under FOSS license? Well, it is a free build system, but now it appears it builds with the fedora version (at least in rawhide). Sion didn't. I have converted it to use Fedora's waf version and BuildRequire it. You can see the waf license in the 'waf' file. Sadly, the version in F9/F10 is too old, so there I will need to keep building with the local copy or get an update from the maintainer. New version that fixes above: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/gigolo/gigolo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/gigolo/gigolo-0.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 05:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] New: Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 Summary: Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/irc-otr.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/irc-otr-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This provides modules which implement Off-The-Record (OTR) Messaging for a number of popular IRC clients. Builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1129261 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 05:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160553.n1G5rroM013812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 05:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160558.n1G5wsmQ029502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 00:58:53 EDT --- (Rpmlint output is clean.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 05:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160557.n1G5vQJe029362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 00:57:24 EDT --- I don't want to say but the version number is back in the file names again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 06:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160627.n1G6RI3L002553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 01:27:15 EDT --- *** Bug 480872 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 06:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480872] Review Request: irssi-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for irssi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160627.n1G6RHtS002529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480872 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 01:27:15 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 485668 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 06:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160659.n1G6xxsS026716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 01:59:58 EDT --- Okay, so I didn't get everything on the list :P You are missing python-pmw (goes together with blt). Remove %doc from extras. Requires: grace should be requires: pygrace (which pulls in grace). pygrace does not exist in Fedora yet, but it seemed so simple that I made a package (see review request below). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 07:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160724.n1G7OfZt013798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 07:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160740.n1G7ePXd002772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-16 02:40:24 EDT --- I think that we will need to hack either the provides list of itext, or the requires list of pdftk. I'm not sure which one is the best solution. Let's consult to fedora-java people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160826.n1G8QoX9025803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-16 03:26:49 EDT --- Typically, such test-suites are made to be run after "make install", which means in RPM buildroot installations one needs to consider that: %check LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/src/lib/.libs make check I'm certain other packages do something similar. [...] cd src/test && make check make[1]: Entering directory `/home/qa/tmp/rpm/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/test' ./test Test::testStream : OK OK (1) make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/qa/tmp/rpm/BUILD/libwps-0.1.2/src/test' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160839.n1G8dJwE028034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 03:39:18 EDT --- Fixed Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm (The project will be hosted very soon at fedorahosted.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160838.n1G8cvTu013959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 03:38:55 EDT --- I do not think that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database applies to this case, there is no MimeType key desktop entry. The author denied my request to add the license to all source files. I am quoting below our mails and his translated answer: "Deliberately I have not included a header with the license in each file. The license is specified in the file named COPYING and is relevant to the whole program with all its files. The program and all its files are licensed as GPLv2" Based on the content of the COPYING and the header of the main.c files, I think that it is safe to presume that the author makes no difference between GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and since both files indicate GPLv2+, this is the license to be used by us. Delivered-To: wolfy at fedoraproject.org Received: by bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 404) id 4529F20847C; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (mx1.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.92]) by bastion.fedora.phx.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97852081FB for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FGIDHU018478 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FGIDsK001041 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:13 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f10.google.com (mail-fx0-f10.google.com [209.85.220.10]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1FGHxAq020472 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:00 -0500 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so3277418fxm.17 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:17:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DLQZiH7Fh1evsUpENhH8aXdLCHG1tqLvZsK9fxGkgTE=; b=Nk1rVe4XYZ3daCwHijc/hVE0+P4ialpDxKFP0KaHUbfSHDUC2HQuIFD405JZ7arcKU kttOr3s0q0qc9iLXvVTVNcvo6Z+pQdKwA+FrpGoFmggN8NtBp67RTq0R1OatBXNeRcev g7iOJ/X2JNraHhh2bK9EJesVqywpsp+I/bIkk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=duG5Js4Xso5qHHOtetWIFwB27h/H81yxbksICyx6AShyaRBFuDavyHuPV0IswUlwsg 0fEu84CqE7AdezUW0BMA3gFxoOUfnX6mLksNQsVX+Lqpb50W52tmh6xOJ1+oW87jUL2g CSTXo+hMRsA3erbooEMLegUJkr+7bN1g8Ik/c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.241.15 with SMTP id t15mr2381592mur.85.1234714679154; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:17:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4997B5C9.7070400 at fedoraproject.org> References: <4997B5C9.7070400 at fedoraproject.org> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <8a5752f30902150817q187a872ajd01433b81e0b35bc at mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Net Activity Viewer - licenta From: Mihai Varzaru To: manuel wolfshant Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b430c8d999200462f769fe X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.48.31 --001636b430c8d999200462f769fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Nu am inclus in mod intentionat un header cu licenta in fiecare fisier. Licenta este specificata in fisierul COPYING si se aplica intregului program cu toate fisierele sale. Programul cu toate fisierele sale sunt licentiate cu GPL v2. 2009/2/15 manuel wolfshant > Buna Mihai > > Scuze ca te deranjez, dar am o rugaminte. Programul tau este in curs de > a fi inclus in Fedora ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580), dar in cursul verificarilor premergatoare includerii am observat ca > fisierele sursa nu au inclusa licenta sub care este distribuit programul > decit in fisierul main.c. Din considerente legale (in SUA..) este preferabil > ca fiecare fisier sursa (.h / .c) sa includa un header in care sa fie > specificata licenta exacta sub care se afla, facilitind astfel si > posibilitatea ca fisiere din un program sa fie folosite in altul. > De aceea avem rugamintea sa incluzi si tu aceste informatii in toate > fisierele sursa. > Multumesc anticipat > > manuel > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160849.n1G8n5cf029917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 03:49:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332010) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332010) ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec-1.patch Sorry to keep moving the goal-posts... I released cabal2spec-0.6. This little patch should bring this package in line with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 08:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160856.n1G8u224017499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #8 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 03:56:01 EDT --- Okay, here are the latest files with the +python-pmw grace->pygrace and -%doc in extras changes: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-0.3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:07:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160907.n1G97p0f002041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 04:07:49 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-haskell-src-exts-0.4.8-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160917.n1G9H9th004542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #28 from Gratien D'haese 2009-02-16 04:17:05 EDT --- Hi Robert and Andreas, Thank you (again) for being so helpful. Robert, Yes, you may send me an example of the if clause as you talked about in c#26. That would be very helpful as a starter. Andreas, That sounds fine to me! Thanks. About SVN I meant that we probably will upload our sources into SVN very soon so it would become easier for us (and other developers) to sync with the latest updates. Please give me a few days (I have a very, very busy week with making a presentation and a deadline of sub-project) to discuss this over with my friend Schlomo and to prepare rear for the latest suggestions. Rgds, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160922.n1G9MOvl005807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160935.n1G9ZF1N027396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 Andrew Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aph at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Andrew Haley 2009-02-16 04:35:14 EDT --- Yes, this must be caused by automatic dependency generation in RPM. I suppose the best thing usually is to tell the truth: pdftk needs the library and itext provides it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 09:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:46:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902160946.n1G9kH2e011558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-16 04:46:11 EDT --- As discussed by mail, after I've reviewed 3 of your submission and deemed them approvable (the actual approving will happen when you get sponsored) I'll sponsor you. Full review done, looks good, I only have a few small nitpicks: MUST FIX -------- * You are missing: BuildRequires: perl, note that Requires will not get installed during the build, only BuildRequires (and visa versa during install) * Source code changes / conversions should be done in %prep, so please move these 3 lines: iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 LICENSE > LICENSE.utf8 touch -c -r LICENSE LICENSE.utf8 mv LICENSE.utf8 LICENSE to %prep SHOULD FIX ---------- * Please add a comment as to why you are removing these files: rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/gpt-perl-version rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/globus_core-src.tar.gz rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/gpt_scripts_list * It is sort of standard to put %doc in %files the line below %defattr, instead of at the end * These 2 rpmlint messages: grid-packaging-tools.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/globus/aclocal/bootstrap.frg 0644 grid-packaging-tools.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 115, tab: line 1) Simple chmod 755 the bootstrap.frg file, and in your specfile either uses tabs everywhere to indent or spaces, do not mix the 2 note that the Fedora standard is sort of to use spaces. But you're free to use tabs if you prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 10:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 05:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161037.n1GAbtxi024566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-16 05:37:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > APPROVED; just fix up the release to an integer >= 1 when you check in. I've changed that in the SRPM I intend to import. Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gimp-data-extras Short Description: Extra files for GIMP Owners: nphilipp Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 11:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161100.n1GB0fWU016911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 06:00:39 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 11:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161139.n1GBdTiR025896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 06:39:28 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent: [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ rpmlint django-authopenid-0.9.6-1.fc10.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at host-12-116 Desktop]$ + I'm in doubts about package naming - Django packages in Fedora are named with first letter capitalized. However the upstream named it with all letters in lowercase, so I don't think this is a problem at all. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file with text of the license, is be included in %doc. + The spec file is be written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum django-authopenid-0.9.6.tar.gz* b15d22dd9d83a5c5fa8a0a640b40b3f4 django-authopenid-0.9.6.tar.gz b15d22dd9d83a5c5fa8a0a640b40b3f4 django-authopenid-0.9.6.tar.gz.from_srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package MUST successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1129812 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Everything, that the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. [26] APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 11:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161142.n1GBgPis007571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 06:42:24 EDT --- I happen to use xchat :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] New: Review Request: hunspell-da - Danish thesaurus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-da - Danish thesaurus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-da - Danish thesaurus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-da.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/mythes-da-0.1.9-0.1.beta.fc10.src.rpm Description: Danish thesaurus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161224.n1GCOXe9003319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 --- Comment #17 from Robert Marcano 2009-02-16 07:24:31 EDT --- done http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/trilead-ssh2/trilead-ssh2-213-3.fc10.src.rpm http://www.marcanoonline.com/downloads/fedora/package_submissions/trilead-ssh2/trilead-ssh2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161233.n1GCXilO005477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Haley 2009-02-16 07:33:43 EDT --- Thinking about this some more, simply exporting itext-2.1.4.jar.so is probably wrong. When itext gets rebuilt, we need to rebuild pdftk as well. So I think we're going to need a versioned symlink: itext-2.1.4.jar.so -> itext-2.1.4-1.fc10.jar.so and export the full version rather than itext-2.1.4.jar.so. We don't know for certain that any minor change to itext will require pdftk to be recompiled. but it might. so it's safer to insist on an exact build match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161241.n1GCfDCb007269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha 2009-02-16 07:41:11 EDT --- Packages: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/beteckna-0.3/beteckna-sfd-fonts.spec It builds fine.. I am still having trouble with the %package etc part.. This package too, the rpm names arent as they are supposed to be.. Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/SRPMS/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-general-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-lower-case-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/Package/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/beteckna-sfd-fonts-beteckna-sfd-small-caps-fonts-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Ive tried what the multi spec has in it.. Got stuck there.. Doing anything else with the spec gives me "%post file not found".. I've been stuck there for almost two weeks until i atleast managed to build this. One of you will have to please tell me how to do that part properly.. The fontforge warning/error persists. It gives a 0 exit status though.. Am waiting for a reply from the mailing list for confirmation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 12:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161244.n1GCi4JL007706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-16 07:44:01 EDT --- Not a full review yet but a first round of remarks: MUST FIX: --------- * Add a comment explaining how to get the Source0 tarbal, so people who want to verify its contents against the original can do that * s390x is a 64 bit arch also * since the devel subpackage requires the main package there is no need for it to own directories which are also owned by the main package SHOULD FIX: ----------- * rpmlint warning: globus-core.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 116, tab: line 1) * How did you come to the devel / non-devel split. Atleast the aclocal and doxygen files look like devel files to me. Only files which are needed to *run* globus tk using applications should be in the main package, the rest should all be in the devel package * Given the short list of files in the package I see no need for all the magic to generate filelists. Why not just add everything manually (with wildcards) to %files, that way it is much clearer what is going on * Why do you filter out the requires on the gpt modules, the -devel package requiring gpt is fine, and if the main package gets auto requires for gpt that feels like a hint that the package is not split properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161304.n1GD48ij025362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-16 08:04:06 EDT --- Update for 0.25.91. No changes to packaging. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.91-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161316.n1GDG4Nv028616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-16 08:16:02 EDT --- Just some quick comments - '--vendor fedora' is obsolete for new packages - I think that 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme' is needed - To make your life easier in the future, change 'Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/osggtk/osggtk-0.1.2.tar.bz2' to 'Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/osggtk/osggtk-%{version}.tar.bz2'. Same in '%setup -q -n osggtk-0.1.2' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161314.n1GDE1hR014168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 13:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161341.n1GDfAhO020506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-16 08:41:08 EDT --- > -n osggtk-0.1.2 -n %{name}-%{version} is the default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161434.n1GEYreJ015215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-16 09:34:52 EDT --- Builded in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161433.n1GEX0kF014906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-16 09:32:59 EDT --- OK, There is nothing else holding this review. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161434.n1GEYCAn001437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-16 09:34:11 EDT --- Builded in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161435.n1GEZcQq002114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-16 09:35:37 EDT --- Close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484676] Review Request: eclipse-dtp - Eclipse Data Tools Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161438.n1GEc1rf016452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484676 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-16 09:37:59 EDT --- Packages available in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 14:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161455.n1GEtcLV021192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #48 from Eric Christensen 2009-02-16 09:55:37 EDT --- Of course, and it will until a major rewrite of Publican occurs. Apparently this is how all RH Publican packages appear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161538.n1GFc8A9029847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 10:38:06 EDT --- Ping, Hubert :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161551.n1GFpNMj016677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #12 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-02-16 10:51:18 EDT --- Here is the one that I used http://georgiou.fedorapeople.org/tmp/root.spec not perfect but it does build a usable 5.22 root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161534.n1GFYUIE027686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 10:34:29 EDT --- * I also think that the mochiweb should be excluded and packaged separately. How different version, shipped with couchdb, from the upstream one? * rpmlint warnings (and one error) should be safely ignored. * "Requires: %{_bindir}/icu-config" looks ugly. First, is it really need, to have libicu-devel, to couchdb to work? Second, why you decided to require %{_bindir}/icu-config instead of libicu-devel? Other (still remaining) issues from Hubert's notes: * No need to explicitly require shadow-utils (as Hubert already mentioned). * Use %{_localstatedir} in sed string and in couchdb_home var instead of /var * remove 'exit 0' in %pre * use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161528.n1GFSp13024251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #19 from Mattias Ellert 2009-02-16 10:28:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > > MUST FIX > -------- > * You are missing: BuildRequires: perl, note that Requires will not get > installed > during the build, only BuildRequires (and visa versa during install) I know the difference between Requires and BuildRequires, however perl always got dragged in for me in the default build environment by e.g. rpm-build or redhat-rpm-config. But an explicit BuildRequires on perl doesn't hurt - added. > * Source code changes / conversions should be done in %prep, so please move > these > 3 lines: > iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 LICENSE > LICENSE.utf8 > touch -c -r LICENSE LICENSE.utf8 > mv LICENSE.utf8 LICENSE > to %prep Changed accordingly. > SHOULD FIX > ---------- > * Please add a comment as to why you are removing these files: > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/gpt-perl-version > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/globus_core-src.tar.gz > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/globus/gpt_scripts_list Done. > * It is sort of standard to put %doc in %files the line below %defattr, instead > of at the end Done. > * These 2 rpmlint messages: > grid-packaging-tools.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/globus/aclocal/bootstrap.frg 0644 > grid-packaging-tools.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 115, > tab: line 1) The /usr/share/globus/aclocal/bootstrap.frg file is a script fragment - it is not intended to be executable standalone. It does have a shebang so that when put together with other pieces to create a complete script that script will be executable. Making the fragment executable would silence rpmlint, but it would contradict the intended usage of the file. The specfile uses tabs everywhere for indentation. However it is not possible to enter 1.375 tabs. For this you have do 1 tab + 3 spaces. Line 115 (now 120) starts with a tab, so I don't see why rpmlint complains about it using spaces for indentation. If there at some place in the file was a tab immediately following a space, or a set of 2 or more consecutive spaces crossing or ending at an even 8 column boundary then the warning would make sense. This is not the case. I consider this warning a "false positive" - at least for my understanding of what mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs means. New version available here: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/grid-packaging-tools.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/grid-packaging-tools-3.2-14.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 15:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161515.n1GFFaET016646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Robert Marcano changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Robert Marcano 2009-02-16 10:15:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trilead-ssh2 Short Description: Trilead SSH-2 for Java is a library which implements the SSH-2 protocol in pure Owners: robmv Branches: F-10 InitialCC: robmv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 16:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161607.n1GG7Nr4021092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #24 from Marek Mahut 2009-02-16 11:07:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Plese refer to > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir > > Because the complaints files contains executable code, the files perms should > set for allow executing of this files. These files are scripts used from the main executable script. I don't think they should be executable - nobody will never execute it separately. Looking in my site-packages directory, no files is set as executable. Also, only very few __init__.py files starts with shebang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 16:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161630.n1GGU95t019104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-02-16 11:30:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > MUST FIX: > --------- > * Add a comment explaining how to get the Source0 tarbal, so people who want > to verify its contents against the original can do that The source was extracted from the globus distribution tarball: http://www-unix.globus.org/ftppub/gt4/4.2.1/installers/src/gt4.2.1-all-source-installer.tar.bz2 using this script: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/scripts/split-release.sh I should be able to think up a short comment along those lines (and reuse it for the other globus packages.) > * s390x is a 64 bit arch also I'll add it > * since the devel subpackage requires the main package there is no need for it > to own directories which are also owned by the main package OK I'll fix that. (I previously saw some problems with left-behind orphaned directories, but I can't seem the reproduce those problems now.) > SHOULD FIX: > ----------- > * rpmlint warning: > globus-core.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 116, tab: line > 1) This is the same thing as in the grid-packaging-tools package - I still think this is a false positive. > * How did you come to the devel / non-devel split. Atleast the aclocal and > doxygen > files look like devel files to me. Only files which are needed to *run* > globus > tk using applications should be in the main package, the rest should all be > in > the devel package The globus-core package is very different from the rest of the globus packages. All of globus-core is devel, none of it is needed at runtime. I did the split so that architecture independent files are in the main package and the architecture dependent files are in the devel-package. For a i386 on x86_64 installation you could then install main + devel from x86_64 and devel from i386. I found that to be the most natural split if a split should be done. Thinking about it, it might make more sense to just put all the files in main and not split it into subpackages. You could then still install both i386 and x86_64 together since the common files would be exactly the same. Is more sensible? > * Given the short list of files in the package I see no need for all the magic > to generate filelists. Why not just add everything manually (with wildcards) > to %files, that way it is much clearer what is going on There is no magic here. The split between packages is automatically defined by gpt. What is done is simply a format conversion form the gpt filelist format to the rpm filelist format. I agree that in the case of globus-core, which is not split in so many sub packages you don't gain a lot. The gain is much more noticeable in packages that generate four or five sub packages. From a package maintainability point of view it is however much easier to use the same packaging instructions for all globus packages, though it is a slight overkill for globus-core. > * Why do you filter out the requires on the gpt modules, the -devel package > requiring gpt is fine, and if the main package gets auto requires for gpt > that feels like a hint that the package is not split properly. As I said, all of globus-core is really devel. No non-devel package requires globus-core. However all globus-*-devel packages require globus-core and If you install a globus-*-devel package for anything else than building other globus packages you don't need gpt. I really don't like having gpt being dragged in by anything. I consider this a major feature of the packaging. I didn't prepare a new package yet, since you indicated that you might have additional comments already. Let me know if you want me to create a new package version at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 16:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161649.n1GGnpq8023793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-02-16 11:49:50 EDT --- This is what George said about the error,"It indicates an internal problem in fontforge that will sometimes cause an error. You can correct it by rewriting fontforge's code so that it handles rounding errors better. This is not something I can do, but if you can please do so.". I certainly cannot rewrite the code to fontforge. How should i handle it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 16:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161653.n1GGrguQ024971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-16 11:53:41 EDT --- Hi Peter, > * I also think that the mochiweb should be excluded and packaged separately. > How different version, shipped with couchdb, from the upstream one? I think is better wait for first official release of mochiweb. > * "Requires: %{_bindir}/icu-config" looks ugly. First, is it really need, to > have libicu-devel, to couchdb to work? Second, why you decided to require > %{_bindir}/icu-config instead of libicu-devel? Using "requires: libicu-devel results in two erros in rpmlint output: [allisson at notebook RPMS]$ rpmlint couchdb-0.8.1-3.fc11.i386.rpm couchdb.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/couchdb couchdb couchdb.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/couchdb couchdb couchdb.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/couchdb couchdb couchdb.i386: E: devel-dependency libicu-devel couchdb.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libicu-devel couchdb.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/couchdb/erlang/lib/couch-0.8.1-incubating/priv/lib/couch_erl_driver.so couch_erl_driver.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. > * No need to explicitly require shadow-utils (as Hubert already mentioned). > * remove 'exit 0' in %pre I following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups > * use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir} I don't see is wrong here, i using %{_initrddir}/couchdb for sysvinit script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 16:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161657.n1GGv1lu019443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-16 11:57:00 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161712.n1GHC7mA023016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-16 12:12:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > spot, can we ship this? Nope. Those use restrictions clearly make lmbench non-free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457916] Review Request: lmbench - lmbench benchmark tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161721.n1GHLlZr031765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457916 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #12 from Eric Sandeen 2009-02-16 12:21:45 EDT --- Thanks Spot, thought so but wanted the official word. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161739.n1GHdq2W003425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #6 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-02-16 12:39:51 EDT --- Hi, Fabian. Ja man pages added. Thanks a lot. SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/fedora/packages/pdumpfs/1.3-4/pdumpfs.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/fedora/packages/pdumpfs/1.3-4/pdumpfs-1.3-4.fc10.src.rpm (I'm having some troubles with my fedora peolpe account.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161746.n1GHk8OS007647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-16 12:46:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332070) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332070) License in need of audit - no2 To spot: This time would you review the license of the file attached? It seems that I overlooked this file in the previous check, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161751.n1GHp0xu006321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-16 12:50:59 EDT --- That's an MIT variant, no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:51:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161751.n1GHpVEV009080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #9 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 12:51:30 EDT --- Feedback from the upstream author: " I've examined the files in the bin directory and removed some of the too specialized files and also modified/updated some of them. Now the directory contains _gnuplot.py gnuplot.bat pyreport file2interactive.py profiler.py regression.py floatdiff.py ps2mpeg.py subst.py All of these, except pyreport, are scripts developed or used in my "Python for Computational Science" book (a new README file in the bin directory briefly explains what the remaining files here are used for). The files may well go to another bin directory (/usr/local/bin, for instance). The only problem I can foresee is that they go to a directory that users do not have in their PATH. Another possibility is to say that these files (except pyreport) are for the mentioned book only, and since this book has a special bin directory I can easily move them there. This is okay with me if SciTools users do not think they lose much. What they lose is basically the following: gnuplot.bat, _gnuplot.py: ability to run Gnuplot on Windows as it is run on Unix file2interactive.py: quick creation of interactive sessions (maybe more a utility for a book writer...) profiler.py: trivial front-end, but makes profiling a one-line command regression.py, floatdiff.py: original tools supporting regression tests with floating-point numbers (i.e., reference results change with hardware) subst.py: cross-platform sed-like substitution command pyreport in this dir allows the original pyreport program to work with scitools.easyviz. Tell me what you think. An update to v0.6 was just committed to the svn repository (incl. the updates mentioned above). " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161757.n1GHvTN4008103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #7 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-02-16 12:57:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdumpfs Short Description: Daily backup system Owners: lspooky Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 17:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161758.n1GHwAhB010764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161806.n1GI6aUa013309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #10 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 13:06:35 EDT --- Should the solution be move all the /bin files to the doc directory except pyreport and maybe a couple others and have a README in the doc directory saying "These /bin files are needed to run the examples from the book, if you want to run these example move them to somewhere in your $PATH such as your current directory or add this directory to your $PATH"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161807.n1GI7RCa013667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-16 13:07:26 EDT --- Well, would you explain why you want to split each binaries into different subpackages? I don't think people using mrpt can get much gain , and the naming of subpackages seems confusing because from the first look some subpackages have names which don't seem to be related to mrpt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161819.n1GIJQ8B013151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #13 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 13:19:24 EDT --- Thanks a lot for that .spec file. I will go back to work and try to clean everything up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161831.n1GIVUqt015914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-16 13:31:29 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/impressive/impressive-0.10.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Notes: - Fix requires for dejavu fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161827.n1GIRZIa015005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 13:27:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Should the solution be move all the /bin files to the doc directory except > pyreport and maybe a couple others and have a README in the doc directory > saying "These /bin files are needed to run the examples from the book, if you > want to run these example move them to somewhere in your $PATH such as your > current directory or add this directory to your $PATH"? Well, that is one option; another would be to put the files in a package-provided dir that is added in the system $PATH. Looking at the reply for upstream, I'd put the files under %doc, since the package works without them; but this is your decision to make. Just as long as the files don't interfere with other packages. pyreport is a probable troublemaker, since (as the author stated) there is a program called pyreport, even though it is not in Fedora at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161828.n1GISokY018209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-16 13:28:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > That's an MIT variant, no problem. Thank you. Now the license issue on this package is all cleared. Full review will follow later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456150] Review Request: slapi-nis - NIS Server and Schema Compatibility plugins for Fedora DS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161832.n1GIWiYv016272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456150 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456150] Review Request: slapi-nis - NIS Server and Schema Compatibility plugins for Fedora DS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161832.n1GIWLCS016142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456150 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 13:32:20 EDT --- Don't forget to close tickets when package was pushed to main repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455539] Review Request: yui - JavaScript library for building dynamic web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161833.n1GIXnKh019260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455539 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 13:33:48 EDT --- ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161833.n1GIXVjj019201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 13:33:30 EDT --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161837.n1GIbl56017329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-16 13:37:46 EDT --- I'm sorry that I have talk you anything wrong about the dajavu fonts packagenames on the differents Fedora releases. So it may be nice, if you can revert to impressive-0.10-2-3 Good: + Local build works fine + Local install works fine. + Start of the application works fine + Local uninstall works fine. If you are revert to impressive-0.1.2-3, you are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161846.n1GIkP1w019379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-16 13:46:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: impressive Short Description: The stylish way of giving presentations Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161844.n1GIir9B021570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 --- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-16 13:44:52 EDT --- Ok, i'll use impressive-0.1.2-3, thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161843.n1GIhu7S021352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-16 13:43:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwps-0.1.2/libwps.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libwps-0.1.2/libwps-0.1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Okay, I added this - Thank you. I`ll try to learn more about this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161847.n1GIl4Ib019531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-16 13:47:04 EDT --- I will take care of the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161859.n1GIximW022626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt --- Comment #12 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-16 13:59:43 EDT --- I will take of the review of pygrace and so I am interested in the progress of this package. :-) Joseph is this your first package? Are you sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 18:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161858.n1GIwXN4022478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 13:58:32 EDT --- Any news since Oclober 2008? Please import it and build (if you didn't loose interest). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161904.n1GJ4oqg024101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #14 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 14:04:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I also add some french translation in the desktop file, do I have the right to > do that? Yes, adding translations are always welcome (assuming they are correct, of course :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:19:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161919.n1GJJgPa030164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #13 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 14:19:41 EDT --- This is my first package. With any luck I will try to have the whole thing completed today. :) I don't know about being sponsored, but Jussi above is doing a great job helping me get through the packaging process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161923.n1GJNVGB028211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 14:23:30 EDT --- What is the reason of using # Upstream script does not install the .desktop file if KDE is not installed, # so we install it manually: install -D -m 644 $(pwd)/cutecom.desktop ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/cutecom.desktop # Validate .desktop files: desktop-file-validate ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/cutecom.desktop instead of desktop-file-install which install and validates in a sigle step ? According to the source files, the license should be GPLv2+. All of them include: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. You must include the license (COPYING) as %doc. I would also include the changelog and the "todo" files but I wouldn't cry if you choose to ignore them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161932.n1GJWoVU030909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Steve Whitehouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |swhiteho at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161939.n1GJdDbk032585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Blocks| |177841 AssignedTo|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 14:39:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > This is my first package. With any luck I will try to have the whole thing > completed today. :) I don't know about being sponsored, but Jussi above is > doing a great job helping me get through the packaging process. Well, in that case I can't formally review the package, you need to get a sponsor to do it; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161946.n1GJkPGR002218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #3 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-02-16 14:46:24 EDT --- Review comments: Regarding comment #1, I think you need to open a separate bug for the ppc64 issues. That can then be addressed at a later date. It doesn't look like its likely to be a big issue to solve though, so it might be easier to solve it rather than open the bug. I've been all though the review guidelines and thats all that I can find which isn't already done, so if we can resolve that, then I think its good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161943.n1GJh8v8004461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #15 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-16 14:43:07 EDT --- I am sponsor that was why I was asking. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] Review Request: hunspell-da - Danish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161943.n1GJhOFR004518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161949.n1GJn512002780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |472898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161951.n1GJp9rJ003426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 14:51:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I am sponsor that was why I was asking. :-) Well then, that's nice. I didn't check if Joseph was already in the packager database, but the mistakes in the packaging did raise some suspicion in my mind :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161948.n1GJmDrX002578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #14 from Bernard Johnson 2009-02-16 14:48:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb-2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks to both of your for your insightful comments. Here is the latest version 2.4 which upstream has made the requested changes (soname changes & include file directory change). (In reply to comment #11) > I would advise that we not package the EXCEPTIONS file, as it is of little > value to anyone. The files src/exceptions/Exception.* refer to the EXCEPTIONS file. Since this is in the copyright notice, I'd rather leave the EXCEPTIONS file in %doc for reference rather than have the copyright notice refer to a file that doesn't exist. Furthermore, I don't feel that we have the option to changing the copyright notice to not refer to EXCEPTIONS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 19:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902161958.n1GJwhS4008256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #17 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-16 14:58:42 EDT --- Jussi, please continue the review. You have been doing a fantastic job. :-) I coordinate all the issues regarding Joseph sponsorship. :-) Please give your nod when you think that all issues have been dealt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162017.n1GKHdtR011111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 15:17:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Jussi, please continue the review. You have been doing a fantastic job. :-) > I coordinate all the issues regarding Joseph sponsorship. :-) > > Please give your nod when you think that all issues have been dealt. Thanks. Okay, if you say so. Reassigning to myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162020.n1GKKPvu014645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #26 from Jose Luis 2009-02-16 15:20:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Well, would you explain why you want to split each binaries into > different subpackages? I don't think people using mrpt can get > much gain , and the naming of subpackages seems confusing because > from the first look some subpackages have names which don't seem > to be related to mrpt. Honestly, I wasn't unsure about this split. On the one hand, I do see a gain as many people will not use all mrpt programs, so they can install what I guess are the most useful ones. Each subpackage carries its own executable, plus a subdirectory in /share/ with sample script/configuration files, so I also see a good thing that only those files of the programs of interest are installed. OTOH, I have to admit that the package namespace is messed up with this change, while there's not a huge gain in disk space. If your final opinion is to leave all programs in mrpt-apps, I would see that fine. In that case, I might also join "mrpt-example-datasets" back into "mrpt-apps" as it was in the beginning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162022.n1GKMaJv015380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 15:22:35 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ => see also note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1481ac792aa58d9a7ce20d51b93eca0a28941ff4 irc-otr-0.3.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F10/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. ==> see note 2 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Final Notes === 1. Please ask the upstream author to add the licensing bits to all the source files. 2. Only tested in xchat. /otr genkey is painfully slow, I am sure this can be improved in the code. please ping the author, I hardly believe that 12 minutes on an AMD X2 5600+ is normal, even if it was idle and there was a message saying "This might take several minutes or on some systems even an hour". ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225683] Merge Review: dev86 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162032.n1GKWlBO019526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225683 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 15:32:45 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162033.n1GKX4p4019572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-16 15:33:03 EDT --- Still having trouble with the soname stuff. It seems that regardless of what I do, rpmlint complains about the soname. Also, regardless of what the executable bit is set to, rpmlint also complains about the unstripped binaries. As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they claim that Debian requires it the way they do it. In regards to the exit() calls, they have it on the todo list, but won't get to it in the short-term. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162036.n1GKaO19018684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-16 15:36:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Still having trouble with the soname stuff. It seems that regardless of what I > do, rpmlint complains about the soname. Also, regardless of what the > executable bit is set to, rpmlint also complains about the unstripped binaries. I forgot to add that things work much better on F-10 (which is all I have to test on). See the scratch build I did: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1131415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162046.n1GKkDoi022933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-16 15:46:12 EDT --- mh, replace autoreconf with autoconf for a better "koji-compatibility" Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/hosts3d-0.97/hosts3d.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/hosts3d-0.97/hosts3d-0.97-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162031.n1GKVOtA018665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #13 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-16 15:31:23 EDT --- Okay, I've updated the package to address your concerns. Hopefully I'm covering all of them grab them at http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios-0.6-0.3beta.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios.spec Note that koji builds will fail on ppc64. This is due to a dev86 bug, to which I've already submitted the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162046.n1GKkLIj022984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #8 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-02-16 15:46:20 EDT --- I have posted the new SRPM and specfile here: Spec URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-1.fc10/CodeAnalyst-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-1.fc10/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-1.fc10.src.rpm I have added the suggestions in comment 5-7 in this release. Please see the changelog in spec file for more information. Thank you, Suravee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] Review Request: hunspell-da - Danish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162046.n1GKkg71024592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 15:46:41 EDT --- All well, package APPROVED PS: since you are using cp -p to install the actual dictionaries, it would be nice to do: tr -d '\r' < README_th_da_DK.txt > README_th_da_DK.txt.new touch -r README_th_da_DK.txt README_th_da_DK.txt.new mv -f README_th_da_DK.txt.new README_th_da_DK.txt tr -d '\r' < README_th_en-US.txt > README_th_en-US.txt.new touch -r README_th_en-US.txt README_th_en-US.txt.new mv -f README_th_en-US.txt.new README_th_en-US.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162054.n1GKsLb6025545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-16 15:54:19 EDT --- Good: + Koji build works fine. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485642] Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162054.n1GKsTWF026824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485642 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-16 15:54:28 EDT --- All well. License checks (LGPLv2+), sha1sum matches with upstream (5f6bdf95148e3e58150eebefb735a2ce4b2ec103 FCGI-ProcManager-0.18.tar.gz), provides/requires are sane, make check passes., mock build is OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162058.n1GKw5fA026790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-16 15:58:04 EDT --- thank you Jochen. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hosts3d Short Description: 3D real-time network visualiser Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 20:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162057.n1GKvxSM028130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #19 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-16 15:57:57 EDT --- Joseph as part of the sponsorship process to show that you understand the packaging review scheme there some steps to be fulfilled. I will ask you to review (without approving) pygrace (mentioned by Jussi above) and any other package that you choose that is not yet reviewed. PS: Talking with someone two timezones away while typing in this thread can result in missing words or worse. ;-) "I am _a_ sponsor..." "I _will_ coordinate..." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162112.n1GLCiB9032722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:12:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162113.n1GLDo98000431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:13:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162116.n1GLGANv001646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:16:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162115.n1GLFET4001392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:15:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162117.n1GLHbIf001531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162121.n1GLLj2Q002937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:21:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162111.n1GLB8e4031215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:11:07 EDT --- I don't see fedora-review + here, and it's not clear to me who is reviewing this. Please wait until a reviewer marks it fedora-review + for requesting cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474356] Review Request: trilead-ssh2 - SSH-2 protocol implementation in pure Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162108.n1GL88xm029457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474356 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:08:07 EDT --- cvs done. Alexander: Please remember to assign reviews to yourself as reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162129.n1GLTHrV005631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:29:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162128.n1GLSOdl005502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-02-16 16:28:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > + I'm in doubts about package naming - Django packages in Fedora are named with > first letter capitalized. However the upstream named it with all letters in > lowercase, so I don't think this is a problem at all. I'm going to ask somebody about this real quick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162132.n1GLWJdi006030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:32:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485586] Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162134.n1GLY0OM006321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485586 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:33:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162135.n1GLZGad006897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-16 16:35:15 EDT --- Naming is at the packager's discretion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162135.n1GLZ4XC007390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-16 16:35:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162138.n1GLcR6k007717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2009-02-16 16:38:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Naming is at the packager's discretion. Well then, I guess I'll keep the upstream name. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-authopenid Short Description: Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID Owners: ianweller Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:44:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485642] Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162144.n1GLi76U009001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485642 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-16 16:44:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-FCGI-ProcManager Short Description: A FastCGI process manager Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485642] Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162144.n1GLi9oi009021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485642 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162148.n1GLmdwe010129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #6 from Toshio Kuratomi 2009-02-16 16:48:38 EDT --- I've renamed the VLGothic-fonts entry in bugzilla to vlgothic-fonts. It's not possible in bugzilla to have two components that only differ in case so hopefully this is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 21:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162147.n1GLl7xX010360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #20 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 16:47:06 EDT --- Okay, what I decided to do was put bin files in the documentation section with a README.bin also in the %doc to explain what is going on. Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-0.4.fc10.src.rpm Patch: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools_bin_README.patch I will also start reviewing pygrace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162201.n1GM1YpQ013240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-02-16 17:01:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: asterisk-sounds-core Short Description: Core sound files for Asterisk Owners: jcollie Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484726] Review Request: impressive - The stylish way of giving presentations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162216.n1GMGlGq017411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484726 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162220.n1GMKQiY018457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 17:20:25 EDT --- - Hmm, so README.bin is a new file? Don't supply it as a patch, then, just make it another source. Also, as the file is related to the Fedora package, it should be named README.Fedora as a distinction to other files that have been provided by upstream. - "- Moved _bindir to documentation" is sloppy: the system binary directory has not been moved! The entry should be something like: "- Moved files from %%{_bindir} to documentation to prevent clashes." Note the double %% to prevent rpmbuild from expanding the macro in the changelog. - Your release numbering is a bit unconventional, normally releases are numbered starting from 1 and with integers, not decimals. - Also, please run rpmlint on the releases you create (both SRPM/spec file and compiled binary RPMS including the debuginfo packages), and paste the output in the bugzilla entry (here). This helps both you and the reviewer. I will try to do the review tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162224.n1GMO70f018901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484674] python-dns not available in EPEL4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162225.n1GMPhUE019395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484674 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-02-16 17:25:41 EDT --- Packages should now be available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162225.n1GMPa0S019775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162232.n1GMWcZl020939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162233.n1GMXpM5021106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2009-02-16 17:33:50 EDT --- Built and pushed to F10 and F9. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162232.n1GMWdbJ020968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Bug 468223 depends on bug 468222, which changed state. Bug 468222 Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162233.n1GMXqxh021130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 468223, which changed state. Bug 468223 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 22:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485586] Review Request: perl-Test-Kwalitee - Test the Kwalitee of a distribution before you release it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162234.n1GMYeGC021581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485586 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] Review Request: mythes-da - Danish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162317.n1GNHicZ030118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: hunspell-da |Review Request: mythes-da - |- Danish thesaurus |Danish thesaurus --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-16 18:17:43 EDT --- mythes-da of course, not hunspell-da. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] Review Request: mythes-da - Danish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162318.n1GNIhIO030255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2009-02-16 18:18:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-da Short Description: Danish thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162318.n1GNI9JS030185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-16 18:18:07 EDT --- Thanks for testing this application. (In reply to comment #9) > The last OpenGL problem appears to be a problem with the information in the egg > file: > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pipviewer-0.3.9-py2.5.egg-info/requires.txt > > it contains > > OpenGL>=2.0 > vhybridize>=0.5.9 > > but the package is called PyOpenGL not OpenGL, if you change OpenGL -> PyOpenGL > it starts. Patch0 should fix this (In reply to comment #11) > Also the summary has multiple typos: thanks, fixed Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pipviewer-0.3.9-3.fc10.src.rpm It works from the command line but unfortunately it still does not work from the menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162331.n1GNVwtn000968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chkr at plauener.de --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-02-16 18:31:57 EDT --- This is just an informal review - I hope it helps anyway: build test: - package builds fine on F10 and F11 for all architectures major issue: - md5sum of argtable2-10.tar.gz contained in the src.rpm doesn't match the upstream package minor issues: - I don't know whether there are strict rules regarding the documentation, but I would rather put the content of /usr/share/doc/argtable2 into /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10, because the documentation seems to be necessary only for development purposes. - according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Source0 should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz (and not prdownloads.sf.net) - rpmlint: rpmlint SRPMS/argtable2-10-1.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/argtable2-* SPECS/argtable2.spec argtable2-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/.deps argtable2-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/.deps I've had a look at this tests directory and since it was copied out of an source tree which uses auto* tools it cannot be used easily ouside. E.g. copy the directory and try a make fails: make: *** No rule to make target `../configure.ac', needed by `Makefile.in'. Stop. Additionally it looks like that the tests really work only when built from within the source, since they use includes like this: fntests.c: #include "../src/argtable2.h" #include Since the tests cannot be compiled just with the installed header files of the library anyway, probably it would be better not to package them at all. argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/fntests.sh argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_dbl.sh argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_int.sh argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_date.sh argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_rex.sh argtable2-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/tests/test_lit.sh 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Since these are shell scripts it should be OK to that they are executable, however I suggest not to package the tests at all. Instead of "tests" it would be an option to package "examples" into /usr/share/doc/argtable2-devel-10/: "examples" contains a bunch of good examples and can be compiled (even outside of the source tree) easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162340.n1GNe9uY002910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-16 18:40:08 EDT --- 1. your package names are broken because you're missing the -n switch to %package as documented in the template. Since your names are broken the auto-posts do not work 2. be careful to put the doc in the common subpackage not the main package 3. After koji's update next week-end you'll be able to drop all the "Group: User Interface/X" in subpackages, they'll be inherited from the main package declaration 4. You can ignore the fontforge warning since this is nothing you can do about short of changing the fontforge code, which is not your priority :p Please update your package accordingly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474430] Review Request: python-uulib - Python interface to RFC 4122 compliant UUID objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162344.n1GNibAC003541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474430 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 16 23:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902162346.n1GNkrXk004176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #22 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 18:46:52 EDT --- Okay, I have ran rpmlint and here are the results. (I see there are quite a few warnings and errors. I would fix them, but I am confused how. Could I get a hint?) Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm --------------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint scitools-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm scitools.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --------------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint scitools-extras-0.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm: scitools-extras.i386: W: no-documentation scitools-extras.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib scitools-extras.i386: E: devel-dependency dx-devel 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. --------------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint scitools-0.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm "scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/slice_demo1.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/slice_demo2.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/Gui.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/convergencerate.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/isosurface_demo3.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamline_demo1.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/alternatives/plotdemo2.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/alternatives/plotdemo4.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/StringFunction.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/plotdemo0.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/plotdemo4.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/odesolve.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/contourslice_demo1.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/ParameterInterface.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/plotdemo3.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/PrmDictBase.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/BoxField.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/redirect_io.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamtube_demo1.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/filetable.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/Lumpy.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamribbon_demo2.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamline_demo3.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/mesh_demo.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/alternatives/plotdemo1.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/_update.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/contourslice_demo2.py scitools.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/bin/gnuplot.bat scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/isosurface_demo2.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/easyviz/movie.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/DrawFunction.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/plotdemo1.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/multipleloop.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/FunctionSelector.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/alternatives/plotdemo3.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/Regression.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/BoxGrid.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/NumPyDB.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamline_demo2.py scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/ppimport.py 0644 scitools.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scitools/CanvasCoords.py 0644 scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamtube_demo2.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamribbon_demo1.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/plottest.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/plotdemo2.py scitools.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/isosurface_demo1.py scitools.i386: E: no-binary scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/contourslice_demo1.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/contourslice_demo2.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/isosurface_demo1.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/isosurface_demo2.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/isosurface_demo3.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/mesh_demo.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/slice_demo1.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/slice_demo2.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamline_demo1.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamline_demo2.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamline_demo3.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamribbon_demo1.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamribbon_demo2.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamtube_demo1.py /usr/bin/env scitools.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/scitools-0.4/examples/streamtube_demo2.py /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 21 errors, 41 warnings." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 00:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170000.n1H00aDK006272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 19:00:35 EDT --- Re 1: Asked. Re 2: That's probably your system being out of random data, not slowness. It took <15 seconds here. Try running 'du / >dev/null 2>&1' at the same time. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 00:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170021.n1H0LVap010114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2009-02-16 19:21:30 EDT --- Oops, sorry, I tried to fix things, then dropped this on the floor. Updated version uploaded: Specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/dojo.spec SRPMS: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/dojo-1.1.1-2.src.rpm This versions appears to have successfully removed the wav files from the built rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 00:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455539] Review Request: yui - JavaScript library for building dynamic web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170032.n1H0WJbP012181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455539 --- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm 2009-02-16 19:32:18 EDT --- Sorry for dropping this. I believe the code in question (the as-docs and as-src subdirectories) is ActionScript, and I don't know if we've got any way of running this within Fedora as is. Do I need to delete the non-BSD code from the source zipfile, or can I simply delete it during the build process? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 00:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485000] Review Request: libbsr - Barrier Synchronization Register access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170047.n1H0lmQr014746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485000 Tony Breeds changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Tony Breeds 2009-02-16 19:47:46 EDT --- Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1128789 has been accepted into rawhide: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-February/msg01149.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 01:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170117.n1H1HHTh020463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-16 20:17:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: irc-otr Short Description: Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 01:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170145.n1H1jGbs025366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 01:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170148.n1H1m0dI025783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #33 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-02-16 20:47:58 EDT --- Done, I oversight that fedora-review part so request for cvs can be proceeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:17:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170217.n1H2H5Hg030683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #14 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 21:17:02 EDT --- Request for comment: I know this package is not ready to receive a thorough review yet, but it has basics covered: builds, installs, etc with exit 0, no rpmlint issues with the .spec, src and debug files. It has been modularized, borrowing largely from Kostas above with -devel, -libs, etc packages. However, as I am still new at packaging, I really could use some helpful feedback at this point. Here are the needed files: Spec: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/root.spec Srpm: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/root-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.src.rpm On known issue is the man package depends on the -devel package. I don't know any way around this since unversioned libraries and .h files are needed for root to run properly. I will start looking into all these issues, but thought I would make a request for comment while I am going about it. Thanks a lot! Here are the outputs: rpmlint root.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-debuginfo-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-xrootd-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-libs-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm root-libs.i386: W: no-documentation root-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/root-i386.conf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -------------------------------------------------------------- (grepping to suppress, for now, hundreds of warnings!) root-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep E:root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/ROOT.py root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/root/icons/bld_listtree.xpm root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/header.html root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/root/icons/bld_text.xpm root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/ROOT.css root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/thisroot.csh root.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/thisroot.csh 0644 root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/HELP.html root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/root/icons/bld_canvas.1.xpm root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/ROOT.js root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/thisroot.sh root.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/thisroot.sh 0644 root.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/root/html/footer.html root.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib -------------------------------------------------------------- root-cint-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep E: root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/win32api/make.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/include/makehpib root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/wintcldl83/try.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/cintocx/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/pthread/setup 0644 root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/wintcldl83/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/gl/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/Makefile root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/longlong/make.bat root-cint.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/cintocx/Cint-Ocx root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/wintcldl83/wildc.bat root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/qt/setup.bat root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/WildCard/setup 0644 root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/dll_stl/setup 0644 root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/stl/_climits root-cint.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/root/cint/lib/WildCard/ARCHIVE 0644 root-cint.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/root/cint/include/matrixstream.hi root-cint.i386: E: devel-dependency root-devel -------------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-docs-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm | grep E: root-docs.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/root-5.22.00/tutorials/gui/mditestbg.xpm root-docs.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/root-5.22.00/tutorials/image/mditestbg.xpm --------------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-proofd-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/motd.sample root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/xpd.groups.sample root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/proof.conf.sample root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/cluster.conf.sample root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/daemons/proofd.xinetd root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/noproof.sample root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/xpd.cf.sample root-proofd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/proof/rootnetrc.sample 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint root-rootd-5.22.00-0.2.fc10.i386.rpm root-rootd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/root/daemons/rootd.xinetd 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455539] Review Request: yui - JavaScript library for building dynamic web sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170236.n1H2aDdC001912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455539 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-02-16 21:36:12 EDT --- As long as the source is distributable, it is ok to delete files during the build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170251.n1H2pgGa005076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #3 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 21:51:41 EDT --- Just a quick comment. I agree with your licensing statement above, but the only license in the source code is GPLv2 found in grace_np.py. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 02:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] New: Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 Summary: Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcantrell at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/calendar-1.25-1.src.rpm Description: The OpenBSD calendar command is a reminder utility. Calendar reads a mix of configuration files and standard calendar databases and then displays lines that begin with either today's date or tomorrow's. The output of the command shows upcoming events for the week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170338.n1H3cCm5014634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #4 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 22:38:11 EDT --- I believe this package looks pretty good. I just have one comment. [?] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I do not see any license in the source other than GPLv2 mentioned in grace_np.py. This is at odds with Upstream's website. Please contact upstream to clear this up. [x] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption [x] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [x] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [x?] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. (I am confused what the actual liscense should be since only GPLv2 is represented in the source code, but website claim matches .spec) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [x] The spec file must be written in American English. [x] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [x] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [x] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [x] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [x] If the package is designed to be relocatable, [x] A package must own all directories that it creates. [x] A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [x] Permissions on files must be set properly. (rpmlint complains, but I belive 0644 are correct for python modules in %{python_sitelib}) [x] Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] Each package must consistently use macros. [x] The package must contain code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [x] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [x] Header files must be in a -devel package. [x] Static libraries must be in a -static package. [x] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [x] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [x] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: [x] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, [x] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, [x] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [x] At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [x] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, [x] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 03:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170341.n1H3fsRB015198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #49 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 22:41:52 EDT --- Erm, I have a sense of deja vu... so what are you proposing to call the package again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170430.n1H4USg8023824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #1 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 23:30:27 EDT --- I have a new place I am housing the files. Please use these, I made a minor correction: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-0.fc10.src.rpm Also, I forgot these: -------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint phoronix-test-suite.spec phoronix-test-suite.spec: W: no-%build-section -------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-0.fc10.src.rpm phoronix-test-suite.src: W: no-%build-section ------------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-0.fc10.i386.rpm phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/phoronix-test-suite/pts-core/modules/dummy_script_module.sh 0644 phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: devel-dependency SDL-devel phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency compat-libstdc++-33 phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXv-devel phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXvMC-devel phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libaio-devel phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg-devel phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng-devel phoronix-test-suite.i386: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 0 warnings. -------------------------------------------------------------- For the above, note that this package needs all those -devel packages to correctly function because ultimately it tests how fast your system can do things like compile different types of packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:48:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170448.n1H4mXlO026368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsmidt at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-16 23:48:32 EDT --- I will take up reviewing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170451.n1H4pprI027324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #93 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-16 23:51:42 EDT --- mock built the srpm without errors: $ mock -r fedora-10-i386 --rebuild mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm ... Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/mpich2-devel-1.0.8-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/mpich2-libs-1.0.8-1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/mpich2-debuginfo-1.0.8-1.fc10.i386.rpm ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 04:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170458.n1H4wG8Y028073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-16 23:58:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Just a quick comment. I agree with your licensing statement above, but the > only license in the source code is GPLv2 found in grace_np.py. Good catch. The package has a double license, then. Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pygrace.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pygrace-0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170524.n1H5OEVu031959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #94 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 00:24:12 EDT --- mock rebuilt into f11 without errors: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packaging/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170529.n1H5TMJP032624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-17 00:29:21 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unalz Short Description: Decompression utility Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170527.n1H5RkH3032641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-17 00:27:45 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kguitar Short Description: Guitar Tabulature Music Editor Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170553.n1H5rOEl004423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 --- Comment #28 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 00:53:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332178) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332178) build log from mock patch file apply error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 05:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170556.n1H5ujQ1005186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(bruno_cornec at hp.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 00:56:44 EDT --- 550 "no such file" for both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 06:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170601.n1H618oj006027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #5 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-17 01:01:07 EDT --- As packaging goes, it all seems good. :) (See attachment) However, are you sure you need gnome-icon-theme as a Requires? It is not mentioned on the webpage: http://grnotify.sourceforge.net/install.html or in the sources as a dependency. When I run the package it seems to run just fine. However, when I close out and open it back up it does not remember my username and password. When I run in a terminal I get this output: /usr/bin/grnotify:591: GtkWarning: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated self.xml = gtk.glade.XML(self.gladefile) Then, when I hit "Save" to save my username and password I get this output Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/grnotify", line 711, in on_save_button_clicked grnotify_app.saveConfig() File "/usr/bin/grnotify", line 75, in saveConfig if not self.useKeyRing or not self.saveKeyRing(self.passwd): File "/usr/bin/grnotify", line 130, in saveKeyRing except gnomekeyring.AlreadyExistsError: UnboundLocalError: local variable 'gnomekeyring' referenced before assignment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 06:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170602.n1H627l4006296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-17 01:02:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332179) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332179) Review of package Here is the Review attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 06:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:04:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170604.n1H648lc006384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #21 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 01:04:05 EDT --- ping :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 06:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170602.n1H62IDU006189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 01:02:15 EDT --- Address Not Found for the srpm url. Please reopen if anyone interested to have this review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:09:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170709.n1H79bjX016839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #34 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-02-17 02:09:36 EDT --- maybe you could be a bit more extensive, Jonhatan has just been approved, seing some more review done is always interesting.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170738.n1H7cKXM022184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-17 02:38:18 EDT --- REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Sulaco rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/vgabios-0.6-0.3beta.fc10.noarch.rpm vgabios.noarch: W: non-standard-group Application/Emulators vgabios.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.0.3 ['0.6-0.3beta.fc10', '0.6-0.3beta'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Sulaco rpmbuild]$ These two warnings are easy-to-fix. First, you accidentally made a typo - non Application/Emulators, but Applications/Emulators (see /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.6.0/GROUPS ). Second, just use correct EVR in %changelog, e.g. replace * Mon Feb 16 2009 Glauber Costa - 0.6.0.3 with * Mon Feb 16 2009 Glauber Costa - 0.6-0.3beta + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, and I have only one small advice. This string (looks like leftover) should be removed: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/vgabios + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file with text of the license is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum vgabios-0.6b.tgz* 36399621c4d6753e83a3cec3009c7183 vgabios-0.6b.tgz 36399621c4d6753e83a3cec3009c7183 vgabios-0.6b.tgz.from_srpm [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (my ppc) + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No need to handle locales. + No shared libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently use macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No large documentation files. + The stuff, that the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + No header files. + No static libraries. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + No library files with a suffix + No .la libtool archives + Not a GUI app + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in the package must be valid UTF-8. Assuming, that you fixed three issues, described above (two from rpmlint and one leftover), and that buildroot already contains latest dev86 rpm, this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170747.n1H7lGSx023828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-17 02:47:15 EDT --- There's still some oddity. Please uncomment all your %doc entries, then run "rpmbuild -bi libwps.spec", and take a close look at the RPM build errors. What do you notice? (cf. comment 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 07:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170749.n1H7nsbI024151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #7 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-17 02:49:53 EDT --- Hi, Thx Joseph. I contact the author for this bug, and I propose a setup.py for a better clean installation and packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170816.n1H8G0Kc028659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170835.n1H8ZNk9032305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 03:35:21 EDT --- Just to clarify, have you fixed the warnings in comment #3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 08:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170855.n1H8tNrr003490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 --- Comment #2 from Jose Luis 2009-02-17 03:55:22 EDT --- You're right Manuel. I've changed it to desktop-file-install. I've also fixed the other issues. This is the new 0.20.0-2 revision: SPEC URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/cutecom.spec SRPM URL: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/cutecom-0.20.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 09:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170900.n1H90all004413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 --- Comment #22 from Christian Iseli 2009-02-17 04:00:35 EDT --- Still here and still haven't lost interest, and doing my best not to lose hope... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 09:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] New: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 Summary: Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package contain an abstract PERL class that tries and fails to cover up the ugliness that is OO in Perl, amongst other things. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1132668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 09:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170953.n1H9ro5U016071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-17 04:53:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: elisa-plugins-good Short Description: Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center Owners: thias Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 09:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902170957.n1H9vscg017358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #15 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-17 04:57:51 EDT --- Removing the fedora-review '?' flag that Jason set, in case that's why this package isn't getting any attention. Luke, are you still alive? I really think that the package is in good shape now, working fine, and easy to review : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/python-twill/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171014.n1HAEkWE021105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 G?ran Uddeborg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from G?ran Uddeborg 2009-02-17 05:14:43 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ttf2pt1 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: goeran I got a request for this package to be added to EPEL, so please create the needed CVS branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485897] New: Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897 Summary: Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Variable-Magic/perl-Variable-Magic.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Variable-Magic/perl-Variable-Magic-0.30-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Magic is Perl way of enhancing objects. This mechanism let the user add extra data to any variable and hook syntaxical operations (such as access, assignation or destruction) that can be applied to it. With this module, you can add your own magic to any variable without the pain of the C API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171044.n1HAi3H4027420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171051.n1HApLTc029442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-17 05:51:20 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171051.n1HAp5Wv029370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-17 05:51:03 EDT --- Levente, thanks for looking at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171052.n1HAqcn2030025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-17 05:52:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-nsis Short Description: Nullsoft Scriptable Install System Owners: rjones berrange lfarkas Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171052.n1HAqR2o029973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #13 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-17 05:52:26 EDT --- i know there is a conflict i would rather pack all docs in -doc as &{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} but i thought splitting will be a good compromiss, but i noticed i will overwrite the doc-directory of the installation. what is the right way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 10:53:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171053.n1HArTVw029906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-17 05:53:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-nsiswrapper Short Description: Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 11:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483620] Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171100.n1HB0Lpc031572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483620 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-02-17 06:00:20 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 05affb35022128a71d8660b6bcb0b0858a49c330 libbind-6.0b1.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK* compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. BAD doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - no need to manually export CFLAGS, the %configure macro takes care of that (rpmbuild --eval %configure) - rpmlint complains a bit libbind-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bind-devel libbind.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bind-libs you should drop the F-7 bits and see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages for details and/or explain your variant with respect to the guideline libbind.x86_64: W: no-documentation you should include CHANGES, COPYRIGHT and README as %doc libbind.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libbind.so.4.2.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 IMHO can be ignored - you shouldn't own %{_includedir}/{arpa,net,sys} directories (list only the headers) and rather make a dependency on glibc-headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 11:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171120.n1HBK37V003442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #11 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-17 06:20:00 EDT --- my comments on the list about the script itself still apply... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 11:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171126.n1HBQgbK004846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-17 06:26:41 EDT --- Nothing in the guidelines, so: In %install I would fix the permissions of the installed documentation files (chmod -x) in the buildroot, remove the INSTALL file, and use this: %files doc %defattr(-,root,root,-) %_docdir/%{name}-%{version}/html/ and in the main pkg: %_docdir/%{name}-%{version}/ %exclude %_docdir/%{name}-%{version}/html/ Of course, you can distribute the files to subpkgs even further, but why? All documentation is in the same doc rootdir, which is fine as it is. The -doc package is just 168 KB and 1.7 MB extracted. It would not even hurt much if you included the html tree in the -devel pkg instead. A matter of taste. [...] On the contrary, your current spec file creates four different docdirs: /usr/share/doc/libwps-0.1.2/ /usr/share/doc/libwps-devel-0.1.2/ /usr/share/doc/libwps-doc.0.1.2/ /usr/share/doc/libwps-tools-0.1.2/ with -tools and -devel only containing a single file, and with the API docs not in -devel, but in the -doc dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 11:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171154.n1HBsaXd010802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485652 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 11:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171154.n1HBsZGI010761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 12:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171235.n1HCZTaB020891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-17 07:35:28 EDT --- Ver. 1.1.0 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1132922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 12:45:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171245.n1HCjFMm023861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-17 07:45:13 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. FAIL - Sources match upstream md5sum: could not find upstream tar.gz on given url (404 not found) N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. FAIL - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: Provides: perl(WWW::SMS::IE::aftsms) = 288 perl(WWW::SMS::IE::iesms) = 333 perl(WWW::SMS::IE::meteorsms) = 288 perl(WWW::SMS::IE::o2sms) = 288 perl(WWW::SMS::IE::vodasms) = 312 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::stat) perl(Getopt::Long) >= 2.33 perl(POSIX) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Storable) perl(WWW::SMS::IE::aftsms) perl(WWW::SMS::IE::iesms) perl(WWW::SMS::IE::meteorsms) perl(WWW::SMS::IE::o2sms) perl(WWW::SMS::IE::vodasms) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) SHOULD Items: OK, tested on x86_64 - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs Didn't test - Should function as described. No scriptlets - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag FAIL - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) TODO: can point SOURCE0 to cpan when old relases are kept? (mandatory) can you update to latest version? (optional) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 13:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485915] New: Review Request: mingw32-wpcap - winpcap library (user level packet capture) for MinGW Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-wpcap - winpcap library (user level packet capture) for MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485915 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-wpcap - winpcap library (user level packet capture) for MinGW Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-wpcap.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-wpcap-4.1.beta5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows pcap library. This is a port of libpcap to windows. pcap implements user-level network packet capture. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 13:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171320.n1HDKmTN000395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno.cornec at hp.com --- Comment #2 from Bruno Cornec 2009-02-17 08:20:46 EDT --- Sorry for that. The version is now official for upstream and available at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/10/mindi-busybox-1.7.3-1.fc10.src.rpm and the SPEC at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/10/mindi-busybox.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 13:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171330.n1HDU6NA002177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #9 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-17 08:30:04 EDT --- Ok, I have uploaded new spec and SRPM Please note that in this package, we don't see a way out of the binaries, as it does not depend only on dev86. Part of it is compiled with gcc, aiming at the target platform. As we don't have a cross compilation infrastructure, there's not too much we can do. spec: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios.spec srpm: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios-2.3.8-0.3.git36989b0d2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 13:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476536] Review Request: zapplet - Zenoss monitoring tray applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171330.n1HDUHOW003072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476536 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171400.n1HE0W86009787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #15 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-17 09:00:30 EDT --- Ok, I addressed your issues: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios.spec http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios-0.6-0.4beta.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171410.n1HEAhg1013496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:13:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485915] Review Request: mingw32-wpcap - winpcap library (user level packet capture) for MinGW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171413.n1HEDxOm014218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485915 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-17 09:13:58 EDT --- At an initial brief look over the spec file, it looks to be packaged sanely. I'm super-busy this week, but if I get some time I may be able to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:16:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171416.n1HEG6Ln015057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #4 from Robert Spanton 2009-02-17 09:16:05 EDT --- Hi Steve, Thanks for reviewing. The packaging guidelines say: "New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number." (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures) I can't create a bug against msp430-gcc until it exists in bugzilla! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485915] Review Request: mingw32-wpcap - winpcap library (user level packet capture) for MinGW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171412.n1HECQfN013901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485915 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171425.n1HEPnLk024615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Roman Rakus 2009-02-17 09:25:48 EDT --- xcdroast-0.98-0.1.alpha16.fc11 built. Now it should be ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171425.n1HEPTr2024539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #5 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-02-17 09:25:28 EDT --- Ah, indeed :-) I think the review guidelines perhaps need updating in that case, since they say that if an arch doesn't build then it must be listed in ExcludeArch (which I see that you've done) and a bugzilla must be opened. Either way, do you think it would be possible to fix this by adding a small patch somehow? I suspect its just some missing/extra #define or something thats given us two definitions of that one thing. The messages to me don't indicate a major issue. If you think its going to be too tricky, then we can just go ahead without PPC64 for now, but it would be better to fix it if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 14:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171428.n1HESh8c021659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-17 09:28:42 EDT --- But if I do it then I have 7f847b5b6066ced228e7b7868524cdcf rhnpush-0.4.2.tar.gz. So we have two problems instead one. You should package the latest version and here are different sources :) The other issues were only comments, nothing serious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 15:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171522.n1HFMgmb004228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 --- Comment #7 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-17 10:22:40 EDT --- Peter, Fcode was not required to build the pieces I'm building so far. This is the reason I have not included it. But I can happily shoot a FCode package if you really feel necessary. As for the binaries, nobody likes them. Your suggestion in vgabios was totally welcome and accepted. But in that case, dev86 was compiling everything. In this package, (as well as bochs-bios and etherboot), gcc is doing a big part of the job. By purely gcc suckiness, we can't easily generate code for alternate platforms other than native. So I'm afraid we do have to build once, and then pack binaries in the way we did for etherboot. Please take a look at that package review for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 15:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171533.n1HFXfLq010279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Jeremy Katz 2009-02-17 10:33:38 EDT --- Okay, picking up the review, there are still some things that aren't quite right here There are two that are definitely blockers * What is the canonical upstream location? The repo mentioned on http://ctdb.samba.org/download.html doesn't have the version being packaged or the included COPYING file. * In the %postun, you should be doing condrestart, not restart -- otherwise, an upgrade will end up always starting ctdb for people. These are smaller things, but really should be fixed also * If your source is really just a git archive, please follow the guidelines for those (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control) as opposed to a one-off directory which isn't keeping old versions of the tarballs * Rather than copying docs into docdir directly, you can just list them with %doc COPYING %doc doc/ctdb or similar in the %files section -- note that these paths are then relative to the source dir * There still needs to be a comment for the patches * Why is /etc/ctdb/statd-callout in /etc? General purpose scripts generally shouldn't be in /etc * Is the build process not safe for make -j? And the final thing, who is actually intending to own this package now and is a sponsor still needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 15:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171544.n1HFiHfm013203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #30 from William Cohen 2009-02-17 10:44:16 EDT --- I built the package locally on F-10 and F-11. I looked through the output of the build and saw a number of messages about generic types should be parameterized and "Discouraged access" like the following examples: [javac] ---------- [javac] 1. WARNING in /home/wcohen/rh-rpms/BUILD/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0/bu ild/plugins/com.ibm.systemtapgui.generic.editor/src/com/ibm/systemtapgui/generic /editor/ColorManager.java (at line 29) [javac] Iterator e = fColorTable.values().iterator(); [javac] ^^^^^^^^ [javac] Iterator is a raw type. References to generic type Iterator shoul d be parameterized [javac] ---------- [javac] 13. WARNING in /home/wcohen/rh-rpms/BUILD/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0/b uild/plugins/com.ibm.systemtapgui.generic.consolelog/src/com/ibm/systemtapgui/ge neric/consolelog/actions/ConsoleAction.java (at line 77) [javac] private boolean isRunning(ConsoleView cv) { [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] Discouraged access: The type ConsoleView is not accessible due to re striction on classpath entry /home/wcohen/rh-rpms/BUILD/eclipse-systemtapgui-1.0 /build/SDK/plugins/org.eclipse.ui.console_3.3.0.v20080529-1300.jar Are these warnings something that should be cleaned up? Or can they be safely ignored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 15:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171548.n1HFmZE4014347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #5 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-17 10:48:35 EDT --- If I am reading this correctly, I should package the released Tarball and not the generated tarball from Git. Is that correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] New: Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ebaron at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ebaron.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-valgrind/eclipse-valgrind.spec SRPM URL: http://ebaron.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-valgrind/eclipse-valgrind-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Eclipse plugins to integrate the Valgrind tool suite into the workbench. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171610.n1HGAX1X016304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-17 11:10:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=331830) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331830) [details] > koji ppc64 build.log ending in failure. > > As documented in specfile, build fails in koji for ppc64. I attach the > build.log for this failure. This build fails, because you are not correctly passing CFLAGS to configure. You need to override CC in configure CC="%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" ./configure Then it builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133315 Other issues: * MUSTFIX: Your package must own %{_libdir}/gcc-lib * CONSIDER: The libexecdir warnings you observe, originate from this antiquated GCC not to install anything to below %_libexecdir. (Newer gcc's install internal binaries to %_libexecdir/gcc//, ancient GCCs install them to %{_libdir}/gcc-lib// and mix them up with target binaries) => the whole debug_info/brp-strip hacks are non-functional in this case. You have 2 alternatives to address this: a) Fix the sed call to hack up brp-strip in such a way it only picks up the host-executables b) Remove all the hack entirely and live with the warnings brp-strip issues However, you seem to be lucky, this seems possible in this case, because brp-strip etc. (at least on Fedora 10) are broken enough not to try corrupting your target's files. * CONSIDER: I would change your %prep/%setup into %prep %setup -q -T -c %setup -q -T -D -a0 %setup -q -T -D -a1 (But that's just my personal preference.) * CONSIDER: Instead of removing the *.1's you could rename them into %{target}-*.1 (A bug having been fixed in upstream GCCs for several years). Finally, I guess you know that gcc-3.2.3 is dead and discontinued for ca. 5 years - Not actually something I would want to maintain ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171612.n1HGCglC016798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-17 11:12:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332240) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332240) Diff against *.spec to address the issues mentioned previous comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171624.n1HGO5dD019929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-02-17 11:24:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-linux-procfs Short Description: Abstractions to extract information from the Linux kernel /proc files. Owners: acme Branches: F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171632.n1HGW940026377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 --- Comment #31 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-17 11:32:08 EDT --- Sure, they should be cleaned up, but that's an upstream thing IMO :) Yes, they can be safely ignored in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171636.n1HGahJt023074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-17 11:36:41 EDT --- - You can correct the warning about the spec file by adding a %build section. - extras: matplotlib is ok, but dx-devel should probably be dx. - You must add BuildArch: noarch to the spec file to correct the no binary error. (There's nothing architecture specific in the package, so it's enough to build it once, you don't need separate i386, x86_64 etc packages). Jos?: please correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK the non-executable script errors and spurious file perms warnings in files under /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ don't cause any action. The doc file dependency warnings show, that maybe it's wiser after all to put the examples in /usr/share/%{name}-%{version}/examples. Remember to add a note about the examples to the package readme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171637.n1HGbYB1027606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-17 11:37:33 EDT --- For 2.73-3: * License - Now the license tag for this package should be "zlib and MIT and BSD". * All codes under Demos/ Extras/ Glut/ are now removed. * Also all files under mk/ are not used. * Source0 - By the way the tarball included in your srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written in the spec file. If you created the tarball by yourself, please write some comments in the spec file how you created the tarball. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code * Redundant BuildRequires - "BuildRequires: gcc-c++" is redundant on Fedora. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * Compiler flags - On Fedora the default optimation level is -O2 (you can check this by $ rpm --eval %optflags). However currently this software uses -O3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 96 [ 0%] [ 2%] [ 2%] [ 3%] Building CXX object src/LinearMath/CMakeFiles/LinearMath.dir/btAlignedAllocator.o 97 Building CXX object src/LinearMath/CMakeFiles/LinearMath.dir/btQuickprof.o 98 cd /builddir/build/BUILD/bullet-2.73/src/LinearMath && /usr/bin/c++ -DLinearMath_EXPORTS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O3 -DNDEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/bullet-2.73/src -I/builddir/build/BUILD/bullet-2.73/src/LinearMath/} -o CMakeFiles/LinearMath.dir/btAlignedAllocator.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/bullet-2.73/src/LinearMath/btAlignedAllocator.cpp ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you don't have some reason you prefer to use -O3 optimization level, please remove this. * ldconfig symlinks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ]# ls -al /usr/lib/libBulletCollision* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2009-02-18 00:56 /usr/lib/libBulletCollision.so -> libBulletCollision.so.2.73 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 706252 2009-02-17 00:34 /usr/lib/libBulletCollision.so.2.73 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Usually in this case the (soft) symlink named "libBulletCollision.so.2" which points to libBulletCollision.so.2.73 should also be provided and the symlink (libBulletCollision.so.2) should be included in bullet package (see libjpeg and libjpeg-devel rpms for example) * Directory ownership issue - For example: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ $ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/include/LinearMath/btList.h bullet-devel-2.73-3.fc11.i386 $ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/include/LinearMath/ file /usr/include/LinearMath is not owned by any package ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Here -devel subpackage installs btList.h under %_includedir/Linearmath, however the directory %_includedir/Linearmath itself is not owned by any packages, which must be owned by bullet-devel. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories * Duplicate documents - There is no need to include the same document files into both main package and -devel subpackage. * Misc rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bullet.src:77: W: macro-in-%changelog post bullet.src:78: W: macro-in-%changelog description bullet.src:79: W: macro-in-%changelog summary bullet.src:80: W: macro-in-%changelog group bullet.src:82: W: macro-in-%changelog description bullet.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/bullet-2.73/ChangeLog bullet-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bullet-2.73/src/LinearMath/btPoolAllocator.h bullet-debuginfo.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/bullet-2.73/src/LinearMath/btPoolAllocator.h bullet-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bullet-2.73/src/BulletDynamics/ConstraintSolver/btSliderConstraint.cpp bullet-debuginfo.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/bullet-2.73/src/BulletDynamics/ConstraintSolver/btSliderConstraint.cpp bullet-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bullet-2.73/src/BulletDynamics/ConstraintSolver/btSliderConstraint.h bullet-debuginfo.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/bullet-2.73/src/BulletDynamics/ConstraintSolver/btSliderConstraint.h bullet-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/bullet-devel-2.73/ChangeLog ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - In %changelog, please use %% instead of single % to prevent macros from being expanded. - Please change the encoding of ChangeLog file to UTF-8 (use iconv) - For spurious-executable-perm and wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding rpmlint for debuginfo rpm, this usually means that the source code file has executable permission. Change the permission of those files to 0644 (at %prep) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171644.n1HGicqE029057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-17 11:44:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > If your final opinion is to leave all programs in mrpt-apps, I would see that > fine. In that case, I might also join "mrpt-example-datasets" back into > "mrpt-apps" as it was in the beginning. I think this idea (i.e. putting all programs in mrpt-apps) is much better. Some comments - For tarball based on svn repository, I prefer to include revision number rather than the date you checked the source because revision number identifies the codes used in the srpm, however this is left to your choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171652.n1HGqX8Z031377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-02-17 11:52:30 EDT --- I have not. I was simply offering to, to speed up the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 16:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171659.n1HGxFGl029079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #9 from William Cohen 2009-02-17 11:59:14 EDT --- The packaging for systemtapguiserver is looking okay to me. A couple minor changes: - instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT use %{buildroot} -Maybe make the %description more like to describe what this package is: Server for Eclipse SystemTap GUI plugin. This eclipse plugin assists writing SystemTap scripts and viewing kernel performance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] New: Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Summary: Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dodji at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description ============= Marlin aims to be a fully featured and powerful sample editor for the< GNOME2 platform. spec file: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin.spec-1 srpm: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin-0.13-1.fc10.src.rpm You can check the Koji build logs for F-10 and F-11 at: Koji task for F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133396 Koji task for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171703.n1HH3MZ0030626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #8 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-17 12:03:20 EDT --- OK, finally there is a new upstream release solving the licensing issues: New SPEC file: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin-0.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm I've also tested that it builds with gcc 4.4, see the koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483020] Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171714.n1HHES0D004390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171714.n1HHETRu004415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 Bug 483025 depends on bug 483020, which changed state. Bug 483020 Summary: Review Request: torch - Torch is a simple machine-learning library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483020 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485621] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed - Interface to the Mozilla embedding widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171749.n1HHnW3T013109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485961 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171749.n1HHnVNR013086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |squentin at free.fr Depends on| |485621 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485961] New: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 Summary: Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/gmusicbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/gmusicbrowser-1.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/gmusicbrowser-build.log Koji Scratch Build : http://remi.fedorapeople.org/gmusicbrowser-build.log Description: Jukebox for large collections of music files Uses gstreamer, mpg321/ogg123/flac123 or mplayer for playback Main features : - customizable window layouts - artist/album lock : easily restrict playlist to current artist/album - easy access to related songs (same artist/album/title) - simple mass-tagging and mass-renaming - support multiple genres for each song - customizable labels can be set for each song - filters with unlimited nesting of conditions - customizable weighted random mode -- rpmlint output : gmusicbrowser.src: I: checking gmusicbrowser.src:59: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/menu/gmusicbrowser gmusicbrowser.noarch: I: checking gmusicbrowser.spec:60: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/menu/gmusicbrowser 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. => menu not packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 17:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object/perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object/perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This meta-policy allows to store Moose object in glob reference or file handle. The class attributes will be stored in anonymous hash associated with glob reference. It allows to create a Moose version of IO::Handle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 18:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485961] Review Request: gmusicbrowser - Jukebox for large collections of music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171804.n1HI4RAu017203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485961 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-02-17 13:04:26 EDT --- Typo, the Koji scratch build is : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133672 And remember that it requires perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485621 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 18:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485967] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485967 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch/perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch/perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Log::Dispatch role for use with your Moose classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 18:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171848.n1HIm91f024246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #24 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-17 13:48:08 EDT --- I have made the above changes so far except moving the examples since I wanted to ask: Is this really necessary. I know rpmlint is complaining, but end users will want to look to the documentation to see examples. I know whenever I want examples I look to the documentation. But if it is needed, I will change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 18:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] New: Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 Summary: Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/maxr.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/maxr-0.2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: M.A.X.R. (Mechanized Assault and eXploration Reloaded) is a fanmade strategy game by the community of maxr.org. MAXR is OpenSource and a remake of the old M.A.X.by Interplay from 1996 featuring network games based on TCP/IP (e.g. over the internet). The game can be played in a turn-based mode (with or without time limit), or simultaneous mode (all the players take their turns at the same time), and features combat in air, land, and sea. Three resources are present on the maps - Raw Materials, which are needed to manufacture units, structures and ammunition, Fuel, which power generators need to function, and Gold, which is used to purchase upgrades. This game is a mix of realtime and turnbased strategy with battle chess character. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 18:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171858.n1HIwrqx031852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #8 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-17 13:58:52 EDT --- Hi, gnome-icon-theme is an error of my part. I have proposed to the author a new setup.py for a easiers packaging : https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2609868&group_id=217132&atid=1039328 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171912.n1HJC79k031565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #25 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-17 14:12:05 EDT --- http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.5-0.2.rc1.fc11.src.rpm I have integrated the ppc patch into new SRPMS. Later, I will contact with the author and persuade him to apply patches in the upstream. Now he is working for new functions. If new version is released, the patch would have been applied in the upstream. You said that srpm does not build on f10-updates-candidate due to bug in GConf2-devel. That means iptux source codes do not cause the failure. Is that right? Also, I want to submit a new software. But I do not understand something. So I will send a mail to you and ask you several questions? Is it OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485542] Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171922.n1HJMN4S001889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(scarter4 at learn.se | |necac.on.ca) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484057] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171922.n1HJMhOT001974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(scarter4 at learn.se | |necac.on.ca) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171923.n1HJNniX002124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 14:23:48 EDT --- Add the font bug list in CC so we don't miss issue updates again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171928.n1HJSSbr003318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters 2009-02-17 14:28:27 EDT --- I confirmed the package still works for me on x86_64. rpmlint is still fairly quiet: uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755 uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks for your work Christian! Let's hope we can get this into Fedora soon! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171947.n1HJlbHp013760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Arkady L. Shane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tigro.mails at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Arkady L. Shane 2009-02-17 14:47:35 EDT --- Hello! I have built package (ftp://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/updates/10/SRPMS/gnome-globalmenu-0.7.3-3.fc10.src.rpm) for Fedora 10. It passes rpmlint tests for spec and binaries. You can take it. And this 0.7.3 version does not compiles on fedora 9: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -o .libs/GlobalMenu.PanelApplet GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-applet.o GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-main.o GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-gtkextra-gconfdialog.o GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-switcher.o GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-template.o GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-gnomemenuhelper.o GlobalMenu_PanelApplet-task-utils-c.o -pthread -L/lib -lpanel-applet-2 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lart_lgpl_2 -lbonobo-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lnotify -ldbus-glib-1 -ldbus-1 -lgnome-menu ../libgnomenu/.libs/libgnomenu.so -lwnck-1 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 ../libgnomenu/.libs/libgnomenu.so: undefined reference to `g_markup_parse_context_pop' ../libgnomenu/.libs/libgnomenu.so: undefined reference to `g_markup_parse_context_push' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 19:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902171948.n1HJmuCh009051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 14:48:55 EDT --- Ok, my bad for not being crystal-clear. & is one of the few reserved characters in XML, you can't use it as-is. I'd say replace it with & http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-predefined-ent Also, while I'm at it 1. next week the new koji will allow srpm building with rawhide rpm, and rawhide rpm has support for group inheritance, so you can drop all the Group: User Interface/X from subpackages 2. for some reason upstream decided is was smart to add GPL&GNU to the font names this release. So for interoperability reasons with other distros and documents that use the old font names, it's better to use the substitution template to alias the old names /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/substitution-font-template.conf (at least for the fonts in the "old pack" at http://groups.google.com/group/bpg-fonts/web/Old_BPG_GPL_GNU_Fonts.zip ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172001.n1HK1Pks012526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-17 15:01:24 EDT --- 1. Well, that's nice, but I'll be building these fonts for older releases as well, so I'll keep them. It doesn't hurt. 2. Okay, fixed, along with the & replacement across the board. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-3.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] New: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plu gins-Diff/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff-0.01-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This plugin allows you to diff 2 versions of modules from within the CPANPLUS shell and see what code changes have taken place. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172037.n1HKbFux026728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 --- Comment #1 from David Cantrell 2009-02-17 15:37:14 EDT --- Correction on SRPM URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/calendar-1.25-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] New: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plu gins-Changes OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This plugin allows you to display the Changes (or Changelog, ChangeLog, etc) file of a module to get an overview of what (according to the maintainer) has changed. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1134038 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172050.n1HKoef7025426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-17 15:50:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I confirmed the package still works for me on x86_64. rpmlint is still fairly > quiet: > uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755 > uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755 > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. > > Thanks for your work Christian! Let's hope we can get this into Fedora soon! uml_net requires suid bit to work , so there erros can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 20:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172054.n1HKsicU026146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-17 15:54:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > I have made the above changes so far except moving the examples since I wanted > to ask: Is this really necessary. I know rpmlint is complaining, but end users > will want to look to the documentation to see examples. I know whenever I want > examples I look to the documentation. > > But if it is needed, I will change it. For me it's okay if the examples stay in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:02:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172102.n1HL2NI9001760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Warren Togami 2009-02-17 16:02:22 EDT --- calendar.src: W: strange-permission export-calendar-source.sh 0775 export-calendar-source.sh to verify the source goes boom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172112.n1HLCAOn004011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #9 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-17 16:12:08 EDT --- ...just forgot to mention that I've also created and packaged a LICENSING.INFO file which recapitulates the state of licensing, there are finally 5 licenses in use:( " MIT: admin/install-sh Public domain: admin/mkinstalldirs clients/{cat.c,clip.c,clutter.c,demo.c,demo2.c,demo3.c,findtwin.c,lsobj.c,restackM.c,restackW.c,sendmsg.c,sysmon.c} include/md5.h,server/{md5.c,wrapper.c} BSD with advertising: include/my_ttydefaults.h LGPLv2+: lib/* GPLv2+: others " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] New: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish-1.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package allows you to perform two-way blowfish encryption on the fly using only PHP. This package does not require the MCrypt PHP extension to work, although it can make use of it if available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486010] New: Review Request: mrbs - Meeting Room Booking System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mrbs - Meeting Room Booking System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486010 Summary: Review Request: mrbs - Meeting Room Booking System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/mrbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/mrbs-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: he Meeting Room Booking System (MRBS) is a PHP-based application for booking meeting rooms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486010] Review Request: mrbs - Meeting Room Booking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172115.n1HLFVbT031367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486010 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |486009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172115.n1HLFWwj031388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172120.n1HLKDRU032398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 --- Comment #3 from Warren Togami 2009-02-17 16:20:12 EDT --- - RPM spec looks fine. - export-calendar-source.sh fails for me, but manual comparison passes. - My only concern is "calendar" might be too generic of a name. Are you sure nothing else that could possibly be added to the distro has this name? I approve this package if you ask fedora-devel-list for opinions and nobody objects within 24 hours of that posting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] New: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plu gins-RT OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT-0.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This plugin allows you to query rt.cpan.org tickets for a given distribution within the CPANPLUS shell. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1134149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172144.n1HLicC3004451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-17 16:44:37 EDT --- Normally, the BSD with advertising file would be a problem, but the Copyright holder on that file is The Regents of the University of California, and they issued a blanket statement years ago dropping that clause. ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change You should tell upstream about this, and have them drop the advertising clause in their copy of that code. You also need to correct the License tag to drop the advertising clause. Aside from that issue, it looks okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 21:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172148.n1HLmLtl011346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 --- Comment #4 from David Cantrell 2009-02-17 16:48:20 EDT --- Latest spec and source RPM: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/calendar.spec http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/calendar-1.25-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172211.n1HMB7HE016494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 17:11:05 EDT --- missing the trailing ";", an SGML/XML entity has the "&something;" format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172216.n1HMGbPU017676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-17 17:16:36 EDT --- Argh. Fixed. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090205-4.fc11.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172224.n1HMOFbN018934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #24 from Sumit Bose 2009-02-17 17:24:13 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I have addressed: - upstream location/source from git archive issue by adding a description about how to create the tar file from the git repo as describes in the guidelines - changed restart to condrestart - added comments to the patches - use make %{_smp_mflags} I have not - changed the copying of docs, because the makefile already creates a docdir with some files and this seems to conflict with using %doc in the %files section - moved statd-callout, because I think that people who are currently using the upstream version are used to the /etc location, but I will talk to the upstream maintainer about moving it. The new version can be found under http://sbose.fedorapeople.org/ctdb-1.0.71-5.fc10.src.rpm If adas does not mind I can take the ownership for this package, but I would need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172240.n1HMep71016662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 17:40:50 EDT --- Very fine work on a non-trivial package. I don't see any obvious problem now. ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 22:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172242.n1HMg8nb016846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-17 17:42:07 EDT --- You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a as usual -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:07:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172307.n1HN7YW7021089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Glauber de Oliveira Costa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172323.n1HNNsVa029449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #35 from MERCIER 2009-02-17 18:23:52 EDT --- sorry for the waiting. the package is ready. i wait the cvs thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 364891] Review Request: icecream - distributed compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172331.n1HNVUVx031181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=364891 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michal Schmidt 2009-02-17 18:31:28 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: icecream New Branches: EL-5 Owners: michich -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172337.n1HNbKks032426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172341.n1HNffUS028008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?, fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172341.n1HNf79H027946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 MERCIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from MERCIER 2009-02-17 18:41:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdesklet-citation Short Description: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets Owners: bioinfornatics at gmail.com Branches: F9 F10 InitialCC: bioinfornatics -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172351.n1HNpECE002404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #9 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-02-17 18:51:13 EDT --- There is an upcoming minor release 1.5.2 which will also include changes to the rpm packaging that you mentioned. This should be really soon. Sorry for the delay! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172353.n1HNrcjP002661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 --- Comment #5 from David Cantrell 2009-02-17 18:53:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > calendar.src: W: strange-permission export-calendar-source.sh 0775 > > export-calendar-source.sh to verify the source goes boom. rpmlint seems to just dislike executable scripts in source RPM files. I've changed this to 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 17 23:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902172354.n1HNsWVK002791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 --- Comment #6 from David Cantrell 2009-02-17 18:54:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - export-calendar-source.sh fails for me, but manual comparison passes. I've changed export-calendar-source.sh to use 'cvs status' to get the revision number of calendar.c. That seemed to be failing on your system, but working on mine, > - My only concern is "calendar" might be too generic of a name. Are you sure > nothing else that could possibly be added to the distro has this name? I > approve this package if you ask fedora-devel-list for opinions and nobody > objects within 24 hours of that posting. I will send a message to fedora-devel-list asking for comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180003.n1I034qF004505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 19:03:03 EDT --- William, if you'll take the time to read carefully https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS, you will certainly notice that there is no reason to replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot} or viceversa. The only rule is to not mix them in the same spec. And to be honest, the %description from the spec looks more clear to me than the version suggested in comment #9. I especially like this part: "This package installs the server side of systemtapgui". Part which should end with a dot (hint, hint!). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180025.n1I0PhcK003050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs?, fedora-review+ | --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 19:25:41 EDT --- I see no formal review being done for this package, I am resetting the flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180034.n1I0YBbM009313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 19:34:10 EDT --- All is well, standard perl module. sha1sum matches: 8c6a8ee812515da3b740a3c7d1dca2a65e796b6f /tmp/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9.tar.gz License checks (GPLv2) Nice to have: ping upstream to include the license in the module themselves. And maybe change it to GPLv2+... APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180036.n1I0anR8009909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 19:36:48 EDT --- Uhm, sorry. I take it back for a sec. Is it realy normal to overlap the provides and the requires? [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --provides /home/wolfy/reports/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(NOCpulse::AbstractObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::BlockingDBMNamespace) perl(NOCpulse::BlockingFileNamespace) perl(NOCpulse::DBMObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::INIObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::MultiFileObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::NSObject) perl(NOCpulse::Namespace) perl(NOCpulse::Object) = 1.26 perl(NOCpulse::ObjectProxy) perl(NOCpulse::ObjectProxyServer) perl(NOCpulse::PersistentObject) perl(NOCpulse::SharedBlockingNamespace) perl-NOCpulse-Object = 1.26.9-1.fc11 [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires /home/wolfy/reports/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Config::IniFiles) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Basename) perl(FreezeThaw) perl(GDBM_File) perl(IO::Dir) perl(IO::File) perl(NOCpulse::AbstractObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::DBMObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::Debug) perl(NOCpulse::INIObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::MultiFileObjectRepository) perl(NOCpulse::Namespace) perl(NOCpulse::Object) perl(NOCpulse::SharedBlockingNamespace) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Most of the requires are provided by the same package, and as far as I remember they should be filtered. Am I wrong here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486044] New: Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486044 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/php-pear-Config.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/php-pear-Config-1.10.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The PHP Config package provides methods for configuration manipulation. * Creates configurations from scratch * Parses and outputs different formats (XML, PHP, INI, Apache...) * Edits existing configurations * Converts configurations to other formats * Allows manipulation of sections, comments, directives... * Parses configurations into a tree structure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485897] Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180051.n1I0ptGN012302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 19:51:54 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package:0d89afaca4b16eab60df45f6f9a1442b7d6f9d34 Variable-Magic-0.30.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456955] Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180055.n1I0tvQX007543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456955 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|457161 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180055.n1I0twuc007572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 00:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180059.n1I0xJiS013371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 19:59:18 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 82d43233eb7f585b6523cdc8fe2f133a150e9752 MooseX-GlobRef-Object-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ----Issue----- All seem well but according to http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-GlobRef-Object/ the latest release is 0.06, which makes packaging 0.04 a bit odd. Any special reason to use an older version of the tarball ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485967] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180105.n1I15UUn014937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485967 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-17 20:05:29 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 21f0787df77f2ab91fdddc3895a23363961f100f MooseX-LazyLogDispatch-0.02.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180124.n1I1OKvI012387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 --- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 20:24:19 EDT --- rpmlint has no complaints -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485967] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180140.n1I1e9se021087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485967 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-17 20:40:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch Short Description: Logging Role for Moose Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180141.n1I1fZFn015397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-17 20:41:34 EDT --- Thanks for report, i'll update to use latest release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485897] Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180139.n1I1dKpV014840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-17 20:39:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Variable-Magic Short Description: Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180151.n1I1pCB3023035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 --- Comment #5 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 20:51:11 EDT --- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packaging/mpich2-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 01:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180150.n1I1oBlj022817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234 --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-02-17 20:50:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332323) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332323) mock build log on fedora-rawhide-i386 rebuilt successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 03:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180334.n1I3YrV6002992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Jeremy Katz 2009-02-17 22:34:49 EDT --- Okay, looks good now. Approved and I can sponsor you. Find me on IRC tomorrow (jeremy) and we can go through those bits. Also, minor point to save you some work in the future -- you can use the tag in the git archive command to avoid having to use the hash of the commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 03:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180351.n1I3pUUh012800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #26 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-17 22:51:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332336) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332336) rpmlint for scitools Here are the new files with the updates we discussed: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 04:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180401.n1I41UXK014691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-17 23:01:29 EDT --- Well, as far as I can tell this package looks good. I believe all of the Musts and Shoulds are checked off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 03:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180358.n1I3wcIi013884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 03:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180358.n1I3wF9D007432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 03:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:58:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180358.n1I3wSBl007473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 04:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180421.n1I4LIn2011660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #1 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-17 23:21:17 EDT --- I will begin reviewing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 04:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180420.n1I4Kxal011586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsmidt at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 06:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180601.n1I61Ulr002596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #2 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 01:01:29 EDT --- Initailly a lot looks good. A couple issues: 1. Please be consistant with macros. In some places you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, in others %{buildroot}. 2. There is a Requires(pre) but no %pre section. 3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets says scrollkeeper should look like this: %post scrollkeeper-update -q -o %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} || : %postun scrollkeeper-update -q || : And like this for update-desktop-database: %post update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : %postun update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : Also, you need to add: Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils 4. Remember to post your output for rpmlint. Great work so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 07:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180743.n1I7hH0O019059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-18 02:43:16 EDT --- I am going to trust you to do it before import. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180815.n1I8Fh6e025071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-18 03:15:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1133957 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0d8ad0864a840a7ae2654953c2d0f380 CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.00 usr 0.00 sys + 0.06 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.06 CPU) + Package perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff-0.01-2.fc11 => Provides: perl(CPANPLUS::Shell::Default::Plugins::Diff) = 0.01 Requires: perl(CPANPLUS::Error) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Basename) perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple) perl(Params::Check) perl(Text::Diff) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180813.n1I8DZgD024544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-18 03:13:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1134149 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1514ab7dd81d8481955a8e48f9cb552b CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT-0.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT-0.01-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(CPANPLUS::Shell::Default::Plugins::RT) = 0.01 Requires: perl(CPANPLUS::Error) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(LWP::Simple) perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple) perl(Params::Check) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180815.n1I8FWtu019562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-18 03:15:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1134038 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM + rpmlint reported for RPM. perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes-0.02-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ==> can be ignored as package just follows upstream name. + source files match upstream url 3a828b717dc6c2bbb455956212978507 CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.06 CPU) + Package perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes-0.02-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(CPANPLUS::Shell::Default::Plugins::Changes) = 0.02 Requires: perl(CPANPLUS::Error) perl(DirHandle) perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180821.n1I8LVJY020673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-18 03:21:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > * I also think that the mochiweb should be excluded and packaged separately. > > How different version, shipped with couchdb, from the upstream one? > I think is better wait for first official release of mochiweb. OK, let's wait. But keep im mind that you must remove mochiweb from couchdb as soon as mochiweb will be packaged (someday, I hope) for Fedora. > > * "Requires: %{_bindir}/icu-config" looks ugly. First, is it really need, to > > have libicu-devel, to couchdb to work? Second, why you decided to require > > %{_bindir}/icu-config instead of libicu-devel? > Using "requires: libicu-devel results in two erros in rpmlint output: Yes, but I still think that it's more understandable for others. In any case,I personally still don't understand why couchdb needs devel-package to work. > > * No need to explicitly require shadow-utils (as Hubert already mentioned). > > * remove 'exit 0' in %pre > I following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups OK. > > * use %{_initrddir} instead of %{_sysconfdir} > I don't see is wrong here, i using %{_initrddir}/couchdb for sysvinit script. Looks like this is my fault - I definitely confused with something. In any case - the current spec-file looks ok in terms of using %{_initrddir} and %{_sysconfdir}. However some things still remains unresolved. * sed oneliner at line 67 should be changed - you must use %{_localstatedir} instead of /var * Consider using /etc/sysconfig ( %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig ) instead of /etc/default for storing init-script's settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 08:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:50:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180850.n1I8oSg2026219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, | |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor | |ge.net, tagoh at redhat.com Component|Package Review |vlgothic-fonts AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor | |ge.net --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 03:50:27 EDT --- Thanks. but strangely I don't see either of them at the component list at search page only. though it's available at the combo box on show_bug.cgi and submit-bug page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180900.n1I90AVK000967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-18 04:00:09 EDT --- You can leave source code as you have it, but if Fedora is upstream you should upload tarball on proper place on https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ Also there is condition that you should package the latest release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180902.n1I92gxU028681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #28 from Jose Luis 2009-02-18 04:02:40 EDT --- Perfect! These are the new versions then: SPEC: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt.spec SRPM: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/mrpt-0.6.5-0.2.20090213svn807.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180908.n1I98Fvj030148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #29 from Jose Luis 2009-02-18 04:08:15 EDT --- I forgot to comment something: > - For tarball based on svn repository, I prefer to include revision > number rather than the date you checked the source because revision > number identifies the codes used in the srpm, however this is > left to your choice. I've used the svn number of the main mrpt repository, which is different from the SVN URL given within the SPEC file. The reason is that one directory of MRPT contains "prohibited code" (patent-pending) so I created a separate SVN repository just for publishing "clean releases", and that is the one referenced in the specfile. That's why I didn't add the "svn -r NUMBER" to the comments there, but just the svn URL. However, this is not a problem, since this reference can be seen as a svn "tag" directory, not the trunk, and it'll not change in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 09:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902180942.n1I9g0bW010279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #4 from Pascal 2009-02-18 04:41:59 EDT --- rpmlint is silent. I runned the spec through mock, fedora 9/10 and epel 5 both x86_64 and i386 are ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 10:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181021.n1IALBmo013223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-18 05:21:10 EDT --- Hello Joseph, Thanks for the quick review. It's really appreciated. Please find updated spec file, srpm and rpmlint output at: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin.spec-2 http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin-0.13-2.fc10.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin-0.13-2.rpmlint.txt Koji tasks for the new srpm are: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1135111 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1135128 > --- Comment #2 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 [...] > 1. Please be consistant with macros. In some places you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, > in others %{buildroot}. Ok, only %{buildroot} is used now. > 2. There is a Requires(pre) but no %pre section. Ooopsy. Added. > 3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets says scrollkeeper > should look like this: > %post > scrollkeeper-update -q -o %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} || : Done. > %postun > scrollkeeper-update -q || : > Done. > And like this for update-desktop-database: > > %post > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > Done. > %postun > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > Done. > Also, you need to add: > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils Done. > 4. Remember to post your output for rpmlint. > Done. For the executable warnings, I have filed upstream bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572255. Thank you for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 10:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181024.n1IAOWdj019073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-18 05:24:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object Short Description: Store a Moose object in glob reference Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 10:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225683] Merge Review: dev86 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181048.n1IAm2Tq018909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225683 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-18 05:48:01 EDT --- Notes: * "BuildRequires: gawk" is redundant (gawk is in Exceptions list https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ). Not an issue, though. * Looks like this package disallows parallel builds. You should add note about it. * It's a good idea to add notes about patch status - upstreamed (with bz# or with maillist's link), specific for fedora and therefore shouldn't be upstreamed, etc * What the purpose of expression at line 16? Other things (except this sorrow situation with RPM_OPT_FLAGS, described above) looks sane. So this is a formal review: - rpmlint is not silent - see output (except numerous messages about devel-file-in-non-devel-package, which may be safely ignored, and binaryinfo-readelf-failed due to my powerpc arch): [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/dev86-*|grep -v devel-file-in-non-devel-package | grep -v binaryinfo-readelf-failed dev86.ppc: E: zero-length /usr/lib/bcc/include/math.h dev86.ppc: E: zero-length /usr/lib/bcc/include/linux/ioctl.h dev86.ppc: W: obsolete-not-provided bin86 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 105 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/dev86-0.16.17-12.fc10.src.rpm dev86.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes bin86 dev86.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 16, tab: line 44) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ I think that these messages are safe to ignore too. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - File, containing the text of the license(s), MUST be included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No need to handle locales. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package doesn't contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No large documentation files. + All files, that the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. +/- Header files must be in a -devel package, but I'm in doubts whether this rule can or cannot be applied in this case. And the next one. +/- Static libraries must be in a -static package. See note above. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files + No .la libtool archives + Not a GUI application + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181102.n1IB2UPF027560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #10 from MERCIER 2009-02-18 06:02:29 EDT --- quote: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-05 13:43:29 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Well, - This package itself is now good - For your other review requests: - I suggets that gdesklets related packages should be renamed to gdesklets-XXXXXX (there are already gdesklets-goodweather, gdesklets-quote-of-the-day on Fedora. It seems that both of these were reviewed by me....) - I suggest that earth-and-moon rpm should be renamed to earth-and-moon-backgrounds (as other packages do). You can check how other packages are renamed by $ rpm -qf /usr/share/backgrounds/* (note: please post new srpms or your comments for this package on the corresponding review request, not on "this" review ticket) _______________________________________________________________________________ mtasaka say this but in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 when sponsorized me for another package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181102.n1IB2wrN022201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 --- Comment #3 from MERCIER 2009-02-18 06:02:57 EDT --- quote: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-05 13:43:29 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Well, - This package itself is now good - For your other review requests: - I suggets that gdesklets related packages should be renamed to gdesklets-XXXXXX (there are already gdesklets-goodweather, gdesklets-quote-of-the-day on Fedora. It seems that both of these were reviewed by me....) - I suggest that earth-and-moon rpm should be renamed to earth-and-moon-backgrounds (as other packages do). You can check how other packages are renamed by $ rpm -qf /usr/share/backgrounds/* (note: please post new srpms or your comments for this package on the corresponding review request, not on "this" review ticket) _______________________________________________________________________________ mtasaka say this but in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 when sponsorized me for another package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181105.n1IB5WPI023053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Tom Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at compton.nu --- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes 2009-02-18 06:05:31 EDT --- I believe lirc is now the effective upstream for this. I have just reworked the build process to make shared library builds possible (with the intention of then submitting a Fedora package) and I submitted those back to the lirc folks who committed them to their CVS tree. Getting lirc supporting libirman should be as simple as adding a libirman-devel BuildRequires to the lirc spec file - it was for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181104.n1IB44WH022364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 --- Comment #36 from MERCIER 2009-02-18 06:04:02 EDT --- quote: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-02-05 13:43:29 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Well, - This package itself is now good - For your other review requests: - I suggets that gdesklets related packages should be renamed to gdesklets-XXXXXX (there are already gdesklets-goodweather, gdesklets-quote-of-the-day on Fedora. It seems that both of these were reviewed by me....) - I suggest that earth-and-moon rpm should be renamed to earth-and-moon-backgrounds (as other packages do). You can check how other packages are renamed by $ rpm -qf /usr/share/backgrounds/* (note: please post new srpms or your comments for this package on the corresponding review request, not on "this" review ticket) _______________________________________________________________________________ mtasaka say this but in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 when sponsorized me for another package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181107.n1IB7Zxe028706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181107.n1IB7fYB028733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181107.n1IB7Mnv028658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 06:07:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff Short Description: Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181107.n1IB7OUw023434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181107.n1IB7Xwf023476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 06:07:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes Short Description: View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181107.n1IB7dEE023506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 06:07:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT Short Description: Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181126.n1IBQb0M027932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 --- Comment #4 from MERCIER 2009-02-18 06:26:36 EDT --- change the package name to earth-and-moon-backgrounds: rpmlint issue: - rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/earth-and-moon-backgrounds.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/earth-and-moon-backgrounds-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/earth-and-moon-backgrounds-0.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _________________________________________________________________________ http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-backgrounds-0.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-backgrounds-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://bioinformatiques.free.fr/earth-and-moon-backgrounds.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181132.n1IBWm9H001866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #7 from Prarit Bhargava 2009-02-18 06:32:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Dan, > > SPEC URL: > http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec?view=markup > SRC RPM URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.3.2-1.src.rpm > > RE Fedora-only spec files: I think there are lots of counter-examples of > projects in Fedora that have support for other distros (net-snmp for one), > which certainly makes sense for the project maintainers. Certainly we both > want to make the spec file as simple as possible. > > I could move the MIB and cron files from %post into the %files section, and > that would probably work for the init.d scripts as well. > > I'll move the two binaries in question to /usr/sbin like the others, but I'll > have to change 'events' to 'ievents'. And if I change some command names, this > will have an impact on some legacy users, so the version will have to bump to > 2.4.0 or 3.0.0 when these changes are made. Hey Andrew, just wondering where things are with this? If you need any help please let me know. I'd like to see this get into F11 (which will be the base for RHEL6!). P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181152.n1IBqRgb006086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2009-02-18 06:52:25 EDT --- It is stuck on me :-( I have few ideas, but there is still a lot of work before it can be accepted into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181155.n1IBtwka006963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-02-18 06:55:57 EDT --- Which does not mean anything for the present package except that you have followed the advices given. This package is still *not* approved and need to be reviewed before so ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181154.n1IBsOFC001178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-18 06:54:22 EDT --- Mamoru did a review of the SPE package and made recommendations for gdesklets. This does not equal a review of the gdesklets package. Someone still has to do a review, just like for any other package. The only difference is that because you are now sponsored, anyone (not just a sponsor) can do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 11:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181156.n1IBusVQ007313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-18 06:56:53 EDT --- Not to mention that Mamoru made it quite clear that you still need to modify the gdesklets package (see the content of the parenthesis, emphasize on "please post new srpms [...]") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480279] Package Review for gnome-globalmenu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181200.n1IC082B008140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernie at codewiz.org --- Comment #7 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-02-18 07:00:05 EDT --- I needed two patches in order to build on rawhide. I have submitted the first one here: http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/issues/detail?id=348 The second one is too much of a kludge. It seems that libxfce4panel-1.0.pc does no longer provide the externalplugindir variable. We should check with upstream. --- configure.ac.orig 2009-02-17 18:51:23.913429581 +0100 +++ configure.ac 2009-02-17 18:49:26.570430365 +0100 @@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ AS_IF([test "x$with_gnome_panel" != xno] [PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GNOME_PANEL, [ libpanelapplet-2.0 >= $PANEL_REQUIRED, libnotify >= $NOTIFY_REQUIRED, - libgnome-menu >= $GMENU_REQUIRED + libgnome-menu >= $GMENU_REQUIRED, + libgnomeui-2.0 ], [ with_gnome_panel=true; --- configure.ac.orig 2009-02-17 19:10:03.997555188 +0100 +++ configure.ac 2009-02-17 19:11:23.179429466 +0100 @@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ AS_IF([test "x$with_xfce4_panel" != xno] with_xfce4_panel=true; AC_SUBST(XFCE4_PANEL_CFLAGS) AC_SUBST(XFCE4_PANEL_LIBS) - XFCE4_PANEL_PLUGIN_DIR="$($PKG_CONFIG --variable=externalplugindir libxfce4panel-1.0)" - XFCE4_PANEL_DESKTOP_DIR="$($PKG_CONFIG --variable=desktopdatadir libxfce4panel-1.0)" + XFCE4_PANEL_PLUGIN_DIR=/usr/libexec/xfce4/panel-plugins + XFCE4_PANEL_DESKTOP_DIR=/usr/share/xfce4/panel-plugins AC_SUBST(XFCE4_PANEL_PLUGIN_DIR) AC_SUBST(XFCE4_PANEL_DESKTOP_DIR) ], -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:05:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483403] Review Request: A collection of quotes in French for gdesklets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181205.n1IC5mVl009516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483403 --- Comment #13 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-02-18 07:05:47 EDT --- well that he actually did :) %changelog * Fri Feb 6 2009 Jonathan MERCIER - 1.3-6 - change the name of rpm citation to gdesklet-citation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181209.n1IC9r7j004795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-18 07:09:52 EDT --- >Nice to have: ping upstream to include the license in the module themselves. I pinged myself and put it there. :) Updated: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object.spec http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.10-1.src.rpm >And maybe change it to GPLv2+... Not possible. Sorry. >Is it realy normal to overlap the provides and the requires? Yes it is normal. Look on some other modules which has more then 2 modules and which require each other (e.g. perl-HTML-Parser). Nevertheless I did not put the requires and provides there. It is automatically generated by rpm. So if it is wrong (which I believe is not), then it is bug of rpmbuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483498] Review Request: earth-and-moon desktop background theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181220.n1ICKvpl007433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483498 --- Comment #6 from MERCIER 2009-02-18 07:20:56 EDT --- ok i wait your suggest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181218.n1ICIJsZ006629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-18 07:18:18 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: SciTools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181226.n1ICQCca008663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #27 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-18 07:26:10 EDT --- OK, removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR (I am sponsoring). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:33:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181233.n1ICXw1o010042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #11 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-02-18 07:33:57 EDT --- %dir %{_sysconfdir}/sems is added 2 times Why there is no /usr/lib/sems/ivr/conf_auth.py, only an compiled pyc file? Is it possible to build this package for ser too? (not only for openser). At least an conditional flag can be useful for other people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181253.n1ICrHq2014167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #7 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-18 07:53:16 EDT --- First, You have done a nice job. :-) One tiny question, why did you exclude examples from the %doc section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 12:59:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181259.n1ICxbXc021351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-18 07:59:36 EDT --- Sorry I do not think it is bug. $ rpm -qR rpm ... config(rpm) = 4.4.2.3-9.el5 ... $ rpm -q --provides rpm config(rpm) = 4.4.2.3-9.el5 rpm = 4.4.2.3-9.el5 $ rpm -qR yum ... config(yum) = 3.2.19-18.el5 ... $ rpm -q --provides yum config(yum) = 3.2.19-18.el5 ... And dozens and dozens other packages. Overlapping is not a bug. If you do not agree, ask others on fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 13:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181329.n1IDTmcB028301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-18 08:29:45 EDT --- Trying to build a package from the spec in pastebin fails due to some weird formating error I can't find. Can you please build the -7 release now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 13:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181336.n1IDathk030074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-18 08:36:54 EDT --- The SRPM URL is invalid, I presume that's because -8 has replaced it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 13:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181337.n1IDbAsP030120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: SciTools - |Review Request: scitools - |A Python library for |A Python library for |scientific computing |scientific computing --- Comment #28 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-18 08:37:09 EDT --- I have adjusted the Summary for the new name. One small suggestion, replace Source0: http://scitools.googlecode.com/files/SciTools-0.4.tar.gz with Source0: http://scitools.googlecode.com/files/SciTools-%{version}.tar.gz That avoid to edit that line every time there is a new release. This is a personal preference so you are free to ignore it. Some small nitpicks: * The spec file uses both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, the guidelines warn against using both. Since there is only one instance of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT I suggest to move that to %{buildroot}. * In the website and in %description the capitalization of gnuplot is wrong. Clearly this is really (really) a minor point. I am not sure about the need of an extras sub-package. I would expect that most of the users of this package will have the full set installed. In any case I suggest to move all the dependencies to the main package and only do something about it if there are complains later that this is a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 13:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181341.n1IDfvrX025669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #29 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-18 08:41:56 EDT --- I agree that the examples should stay in %doc (I asked about the same thing in pygrace so... ;-) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 14:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181402.n1IE2vtP003796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-18 09:02:55 EDT --- Mostly OK except that it fails to build due to lack of mingw32-expat and I don't see a mingw32-expat package review. Maybe its been missed. One other small one is that the patch line should prob use the named option. EG %patch0 -p1 -b .remove-logfile or similar. + rpmlint output $ rpmlint -i mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-8.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm ab54ec1d4ddd836313fdbc0cd5299d6d fontconfig-2.6.0.tar.gz - package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1135503 Failing due to lack of mingw32-expat + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 14:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181403.n1IE3sWe031329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #7 from Jarod Wilson 2009-02-18 09:03:52 EDT --- Apologies, meant to look at this earlier... Yeah, once libirman is being built into Fedora, it should definitely be as straight-forward as BR: libirman-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 14:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181450.n1IEoVOZ009805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #7 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-02-18 09:50:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I added FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker tag, as Gavin said he need a sponsor. Woops! I misunderstood the instructions in PackageMaintainers/Join. While this is the first package I've submitted to Fedora for review, I am already a member of the 'packagers' group because I'm an upstream maintainer for some packages, so I don't need to be sponsored again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 14:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181454.n1IEsqXv010567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-18 09:54:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > First, You have done a nice job. :-) > > One tiny question, why did you exclude examples from the %doc section? Missed it. :) Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pygrace.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pygrace-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: pygrace.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pygrace/grace_np.py 0644 pygrace.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pygrace/__init__.py 0644 pygrace.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pygrace/pygrace.py 0644 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 14:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181458.n1IEw8Qh017158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-18 09:58:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I am not sure about the need of an extras sub-package. I would expect that most > of the users of this package will have the full set installed. In any case I > suggest to move all the dependencies to the main package and only do something > about it if there are complains later that this is a problem. I don't agree; the package should not be bloated. You don't need all of the packages to use SciTools. Also one must remember that there are still people using dialup connections, for whom downloading lots and lots of extra stuff is a problem. However, you might want to add a note about the extras metapackage to the %description, e.g. "For full functionality you may want to install the scitools-extras package." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181500.n1IF0Muq012301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-18 10:00:21 EDT --- OK source files match upstream 9dca5a5876938adfd9dfc20869818660 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK BSD license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. FAIL rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. I run also test, which failed probably because I don't have nose installed? grin.noarch: W: no-documentation grin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/grin.py 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:04:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181504.n1IF40ba018596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-18 10:03:59 EDT --- On the fedora-devel ML Ralf did not cry out loud, so package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181503.n1IF3MKO013195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-18 10:03:21 EDT --- A few notes more: When you copy the package README, use 'cp -a' instead of 'cp' to preserve the time stamp. (Also, you might want to add a comment about removing the bindir after installation.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:08:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181508.n1IF8r25014766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-18 10:08:51 EDT --- The package adheres to the Fedora Packaging and Review Guidelines, and is thus ACCEPTED. (You can do the tidying bits mentioned above once you import to CVS.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481022] Review Request: SPE - Stani's Python Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181519.n1IFJ53o022790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481022 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-18 10:19:03 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 15:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:41:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Package Review: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181541.n1IFf45S022338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-18 10:41:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-Object Short Description: NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl Owners: msuchy Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 16:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181613.n1IGDi5G029475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-02-18 11:13:43 EDT --- I cannot do the review since I'm not a sponsor but I looked at the spec file Several minor points: * You can use the macro %{name} instead of Fox in a number of places in the spec ie: > Source0: http://dfn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/objcryst/Fox-1.8.0.3-R1088.tar.bz2 becomes > Source0: http://dfn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/objcryst/%{name}-%{version}-R1088.tar.bz2 that can save you some problem for later update * Please add an extra \n between two change in the changelog (some tool used within Fedora need these white line between the change): ie: > * Sat Feb 14 2009 Pascal < pascal22p at parois.net > - 1.8.0.3-1 > - Fixed reading, writing files and display of labels in the linux unicode version of Fox > * Fri Feb 06 2009 Pascal < pascal22p at parois.net > - 1.8.0-2 becomes > * Sat Feb 14 2009 Pascal < pascal22p at parois.net > - 1.8.0.3-1 > - Fixed reading, writing files and display of labels in the linux unicode version of Fox It might be nice also to give to the reviewer an input file and an output file so that the software could actually be tested :) You might also be interested to join the SciTech SIG: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SciTech_SIG > * Fri Feb 06 2009 Pascal < pascal22p at parois.net > - 1.8.0-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 16:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181631.n1IGVRX0006794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #33 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-18 11:31:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > > I don't agree; the package should not be bloated. You don't need all of the > packages to use SciTools. Also one must remember that there are still people > using dialup connections, for whom downloading lots and lots of extra stuff is > a problem. It is not so much the fact that I may agree or not with that stance but instead the question to know if the use of a sub-package is the right technical solution to this problem. > However, you might want to add a note about the extras metapackage to the > %description, e.g. "For full functionality you may want to install the > scitools-extras package." I agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 16:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181628.n1IGSM0f000613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jos? Matos 2009-02-18 11:28:21 EDT --- OK, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 16:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181638.n1IGc6Nf002984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #9 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 11:38:05 EDT --- Has the author responded? Do you have a new Spec/Srpm that I could review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181706.n1IH6VuU014949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-18 12:06:30 EDT --- Thanks for the submission. Here's the review. Lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay: * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - please add some line continuations to fix this on line 37 * package successfully compiles and builds * BuildRequires are proper * macros fine * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * md5sum matches upstream * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. X summary and description good - please add Eclipse somewhere in the Summary. Something like "Eclipse plugin for Valgrind". The description could be a bit more verbose, too. * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used correctly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output * changelog format okay * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * not native, so no rpath, static linking, etc. * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel necessary * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no translations so no locale handling * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * package includes license text in the package and marks it with %doc X run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output eclipse-valgrind.x86_64: E: no-binary eclipse-valgrind.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I know I told you to put this into /usr/lib{,64}, but let's put the JARs into /usr/share/eclipse and then just make sure that the package is not noarch. Is there an ExcludeArch on ppc64 because there's no valgrind on ppc64? * I verified that it installs and that the valgrind feature is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:09:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181709.n1IH9VeO010735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-18 12:09:29 EDT --- For 0.6.5-0.2: * Directory/file ownership issue - Now -core and -apps subpackages own some same files. I guess your intention is to move these files from -apps to -core (currently -apps Requires -core, so this is okay) - Related to this, scriptlets for -apps subpackage should no longer be needed. I think you will fix this when you import this package into Fedora CVS. ! I glanced at your another review request (bug 485636 for cutecom) and seems good from a quick look. Unfortunately it may be that I don't have time to review your another review request soon, however I will pay attention to it. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (mrpt) is now APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181712.n1IHC5iK011575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-18 12:12:03 EDT --- By the way, can this package be rebuilt on F-10? F-10 ppl is still 0.9-25.fc10. If you won't build this package on F-10, please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181713.n1IHDriC011830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-18 12:13:52 EDT --- Please rebuild this package also on F-10 branch, and for F-10 submit a request to push the rebuilt package into repository on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ When it is done, please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181727.n1IHRCLh019352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-18 12:27:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pygrace Short Description: Python bindings for grace Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181731.n1IHVqXP015947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 12:31:51 EDT --- An additional issue is the fact, that this package is only useable on the i386 architecture. I have try to build it on x86_64. Becaused this build fails, I have start a thread on the upstream mailing list. the answer was, that the application is only useable on the i386 architecture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181731.n1IHVGRX015886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #28 from Ant Bryan 2009-02-18 12:31:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Trying to build a package from the spec in pastebin fails due to some weird > formating error I can't find. Can you please build the -7 release now? My pleasure! :) Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1341199 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181734.n1IHYb5S016478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 12:34:36 EDT --- sorry, that I'm starting another comment here. Does we need the vmware kernel modules? If yes, we need to reopen this review on rpmfusion because Fedora doesn't accecpt kernel modules as packages and packages which depends on packages provid from outsite of fedora are not valid for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181732.n1IHWgIL016217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-18 12:32:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.5-0.2.rc1.fc11.src.rpm > > I have integrated the ppc patch into new SRPMS. Well, ppc64 also needs %{name}-0.4.5-rc1-revert-using-ipv4_order.patch. Actually assembly codes used in src/utils.h are ix86 specific and I guess 0.4.5 rc1 fails to rebuild on any non-ix86 architecture. I think applying the patch on all archs is preferable. (In reply to comment #25) > You said that srpm does not build on f10-updates-candidate due to bug in > GConf2-devel. That means iptux source codes do not cause the failure. Is that > right? Actually someone else filed this issue as bug 485667. For now adding "BuildRequires: dbus-devel" for F-10 (maybe also on F-9) like ---------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} < 11 # due to bug 485667 BuildRequires: dbus-devel ---------------------------------------------------- is preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 17:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181742.n1IHgsA2022608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #34 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-18 12:42:53 EDT --- No, it can't. It depends on ppl 0.10 that is available on the coming F-11 only. The only envisionned consumer of cloog-ppl is gcc 4.4 for now anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 18:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181806.n1II6lNm028022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Bug 466717 depends on bug 475411, which changed state. Bug 475411 Summary: suitesparse is incorrectly linked and has undefined symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 18:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181815.n1IIFAeC029785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-18 13:15:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > An additional issue is the fact, that this package is only useable on the i386 > architecture. I have try to build it on x86_64. Becaused this build fails, I > have start a thread on the upstream mailing list. the answer was, that the > application is only useable on the i386 architecture. I'm not aware of this and can't see anything that would be i386-specific here. Requirement of review is being able to build on at least one supported architecture, so it can be addressed after it is reviewed. Could you please attach the log file from the x86_64 build? (In reply to comment #3) > sorry, that I'm starting another comment here. Does we need the vmware kernel > modules? If yes, we need to reopen this review on rpmfusion because Fedora > doesn't accecpt kernel modules as packages and packages which depends on > packages provid from outsite of fedora are not valid for Fedora. No, we don't need any modules. This is basically just a remote desktop client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 18:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181813.n1IIDMEX029284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 13:13:19 EDT --- Good: + Base name of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fits naming guildlines + Could download sources from upstream via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream one (md5sum: 8e289d1c6de0b89765420dad6ba0a202) + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains a license tag with LGPLv2 as a valic OSS license + Package contains a verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains no subpackages + Defintion of the Buildroot is ok + Buildroot will been cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Rpmlint is silent on source package + Package use parallel build + Mock build works fine for ix86 architecture + Rpmlint is silent on binary package + Rpmlint is silent on debuginfo package + Debuginfo package contains source files + Local install works fine + Local uninstall works fine + All packaged files are own by the package + %file stanza contains no duplicat entries + There are no files with the smae name as in other packages in the package + %changelog has proper format Bad: - Package should have 'ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}' - Package should use desktop-file-install as described in the packaging guildlines - Start of the application caused the following error messages: SSLLoadSharedLibrary: Failed to load library libcrypto.so.0.9.8:/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8: Kann die Shared-Object-Datei nicht ?ffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden SSLLoadSharedLibrary: Failed to load library libcrypto.so.0.9.8:/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8: Kann die Shared-Object-Datei nicht ?ffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden - Copyright note in the sources says, that LGPLv2+ is the valid license specification for the license tag - %doc stanza is large. So it may be nice, if you can put View_Client_Admin_Guide.pdf and View_Client_Help.pdf in a separate subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 18:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181814.n1IIESSL025742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #10 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-18 13:14:26 EDT --- Peter, comments on this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 18:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:22:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181822.n1IIMi3B031693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 13:22:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332430) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332430) Build log of a failed build on a x86_64 system Here is the build log of my x86_64 system. As wrote in an earlier comment upstream say, that x86_64 is not supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 18:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181842.n1IIgCQr003826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Moschny 2009-02-18 13:42:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I am wrapping up some other projects early this week, and will get some of my > packages reviews such as this one updated. I am removing the NEEDSPONSOR tag, > as I have been sponsored for a while now. Thomas, are you wanting to > co-maintain or something? Not necessarily, but maybe. Well, I just think I'd occasionally use it, that's why I'd like to see it packaged, and I can help if needed ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181908.n1IJ8ouC010282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 14:08:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332434) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332434) Patch to use system tk headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181908.n1IJ82D7010148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 14:07:59 EDT --- Two issues here: 1. please use %{_datadir} instead of /usr/share. 2. These files shouldn't be in the package. /usr/share/wordnet-3.0/include/tk /usr/share/wordnet-3.0/include/tk/tk.h /usr/share/wordnet-3.0/include/tk/tkDecls.h In fact, upstream really shouldn't be shipping these files as part of wordnet, they should rely on the system tk-devel (they're using the system libtk, but providing mismatched tk headers?). I'll attach a patch to remove it from the Fedora package. You'd need to apply this patch and also delete the include/tk dir in %prep. Show me a fixed package and I'll finish this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181919.n1IJJ98H012799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-02-18 14:19:08 EDT --- Anyone wants to pick up this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181920.n1IJKQoq009350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-18 14:20:25 EDT --- > Yes, but I still think that it's more understandable for others. In any case,I > personally still don't understand why couchdb needs devel-package to work. CouchDB needs icu-config for /usr/bin/couchdb, see line 173. I'll fix the others issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485617] Review Request: pygrace - Python bindings for grace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181921.n1IJLwEJ009703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485617 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:21:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181918.n1IJI3If008536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:18:00 EDT --- Can you take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages I think you want 0.6-0.1.b or 0.6-0.1.beta as your verson? Or does upstream have different beta versions? I only see the b tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181924.n1IJO3qR014408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:24:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181925.n1IJPZtf010977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:25:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181923.n1IJNGGx010090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #10 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-18 14:23:14 EDT --- Hi, no response. But a new SPEC without path for install.py but a new setup.py that I proposed to the author Version 1.1.2-3 SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify.spec SRPMS: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.2-3.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify-1.1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Commment: rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181926.n1IJQcGM011191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Summary|Package Review: |Review Request: |perl-NOCpulse-Object - |perl-NOCpulse-Object - |NOCpulse Object abstraction |NOCpulse Object abstraction |for Perl |for Perl Alias| |perl-NOCpulse-Object -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181929.n1IJTVG3011752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 14:29:30 EDT --- A few points here: 1. Go through the spec and use macros consistently. Specifically, %{name}, %{version}. 2. Look at the license tag. Re-read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL (hint: look at the source code) 3. Look at the Requires that rpm finds automatically. If it finds libgtop-2.0.so.7() as a Requires, you don't need to explicitly list it as a Requires. 4. Instead of wildcarding so aggressively for a single binary and manpage, why not be more specific? I'll do a more complete review when I see a new SRPM/SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181933.n1IJXbeQ015024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-18 14:33:36 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the packagers that still have bugs open about adapting to font packaging guidelines there is only one month left before Fedora 11 beta: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule A week of this month will see the Fedora 11 mass rebuild, that will load the build farm: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild As already converted packages showed it is quite possible to make mistakes during the conversion. Please make releng and QA happy and don't wait till the last minute to do your changes (avoid pre-beta panic). If possible start before the mass rebuild so we don't burn cycles on incorrect packages. The PackageKit enhancements stated for Fedora 11 assume fonts and font-using packages are sane (basically respect packaging guidelines). It is quite possible that not-converted packages will interact with the F11 font autoinstall feature in "interesting" ways. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation We don't want that There is extensive documentation on the wiki and most of your questions have likely already been answered there. Please do read the FAQ before making more work for the support team by asking questions answered there. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181939.n1IJdHg6018157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:39:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:45:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181945.n1IJjEF7019261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:45:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181955.n1IJtjmO023333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:55:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181952.n1IJqSml022219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:52:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181953.n1IJrxVX022625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:53:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181954.n1IJsCbP021343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181957.n1IJvx88024048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #34 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 14:57:57 EDT --- Okay, here is the final version with all the changes: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Will request CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182000.n1IK0VA0024744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #35 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 15:00:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scitools Short Description: A Python library for scientific computing Owners: jsmidt Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] Review Request: mythes-da - Danish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182001.n1IK1h7h025182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:01:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182000.n1IK0D44023286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181957.n1IJvaCo022438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:57:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 19:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485668] Review Request: irc-otr - Off-The-Record Messaging plugin for various irc clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902181958.n1IJwcut022712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485668 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 14:58:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485897] Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182002.n1IK2UhB025433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:02:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485967] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182005.n1IK5WFC025005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485967 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:05:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182003.n1IK3QcI024243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:03:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182009.n1IK9v7G025894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:09:56 EDT --- Joseph: You must create a bugzilla account with your email address that is in the Fedora account system and use that. You cannot use a @fedoraproject.org address as that is only a forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182021.n1IKLjS9029940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:21:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:20:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182020.n1IKKv2w028790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:20:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:20:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182020.n1IKK6eD028523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:20:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479903] Review Request: gdesklet-slideshow - Cycle through a collection of pictures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182017.n1IKHjQq027888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479903 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:17:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182019.n1IKJ6H4028088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:19:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182019.n1IKJxL9028189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 15:19:58 EDT --- Good: + Base name of SPEC file matches with package name + Download of the upstream tar ball via spectool -g works fine + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: e9ff4a514f08579283e55cfdedff171b) + Package contains License tag with GPLv2+ as an valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license tag + Package contains no subpackages + Buildroot definition is ok. + Buildroot will been deleted at the beginning of %clean and %install + Rpmlint silient for source package + Package use parallel build + Local build works fine. + Package honor optflags + Rpmlint is silent for binary package + Rpmlint is silent for debuginfo package + Debuginfo package contains source files * Package create desktop-info file + Local install works fine + Start of the applications works without a crash + Local uninstall works fine + Files permission on the %files stanza are ok. + %file stanza has no duplicated entries + Packaged files are owh by the package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate subpackage + %changelog stanza has proper format. Bad: - Please add FDL as an additional license on the license tag - If we remove the automake command, we could remove BR automake, autoconf and libtool - Please start the Menuname with an uppercase. - Build on koji failed (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1136545) Question: * Why to you call automake, if you not patch the Makefile.am files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182024.n1IKOATr029476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:24:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 364891] Review Request: icecream - distributed compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182023.n1IKNFnI029321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=364891 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:23:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485642] Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182022.n1IKMYei029210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485642 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:22:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182022.n1IKM9WA029125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #12 from steve 2009-02-18 15:22:07 EDT --- Thanks for the review spot. (In reply to comment #10) > Two issues here: > > 1. please use %{_datadir} instead of /usr/share. Done. > 2. These files shouldn't be in the package. > /usr/share/wordnet-3.0/include/tk > /usr/share/wordnet-3.0/include/tk/tk.h > /usr/share/wordnet-3.0/include/tk/tkDecls.h ... ... > I'll attach a patch to remove it from the Fedora package. You'd need to apply > this patch and also delete the include/tk dir in %prep. Applied you patch, and made the change in %prep. > > Show me a fixed package and I'll finish this review. The new package & spec is at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-4.fc10.src.rpm - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182029.n1IKTEqG031788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-18 15:29:13 EDT --- Did you hit the "Refresh Components/Versions/Milestones" button ? You have to do that anytime you change between redhat and fedora components. I see the lowercase one here in that list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485897] Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182030.n1IKU2rg032176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182027.n1IKREoD030543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 Derek Atkins changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |warlord at mit.edu --- Comment #32 from Derek Atkins 2009-02-18 15:27:08 EDT --- I just tried out this RPM and I see the following issue: [warlord at pgpdev bootguard]$ dosemu -t "C:\\build.bat" /usr/bin/dosemu: relocation error: /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_term.so: symbol SLtt_get_terminfo, version SLANG2 not defined in file libslang.so.2 with link time reference [warlord at pgpdev bootguard]$ dosemu -t "C:\\build.bat" /usr/bin/dosemu: relocation error: /usr/lib/dosemu/libplugin_term.so: symbol SLtt_get_terminfo, version SLANG2 not defined in file libslang.so.2 with link time reference [warlord at pgpdev bootguard]$ dosemu -t "C:\\build.bat" [warlord at pgpdev bootguard]$ I'm not sure if this is a problem in dosemu or a problem in slang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182032.n1IKWjmC000385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-18 15:32:43 EDT --- Put the comment about the extras (also) in the main %description, so that users find it. Also: grace (at the moment) does not exist in EL-4, which means that pygrace is not available in EL-4, which in turn means that scitools can't be installed on EL-4. You can circumvent this by checking the EPEL repositories to see which of the packages -extras depends on aren't available, and omit those requirements. Example: %if 0%{?rhel} != 4 Requires: pygrace %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182046.n1IKkiDF003790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Sumit Bose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182046.n1IKkDDd002807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 --- Comment #26 from Sumit Bose 2009-02-18 15:46:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ctdb Short Description: A Clustered Database based on Samba's Trivial Database (TDB) Owners: sbose Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: adas gd simo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182044.n1IKiu9Q002102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 --- Comment #9 from Adam Miller 2009-02-18 15:44:54 EDT --- Very sorry, I have gotten a little bogged down with work, school, and trying to wrap up some other fedora related business. I will reference the guidelines and post back as soon as I am able. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 20:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182056.n1IKuYiR005254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 15:56:33 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182105.n1IL55cE007838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 --- Comment #2 from Elliott Baron 2009-02-18 16:05:04 EDT --- Fixed Spec and SRPM have been uploaded. BuildArch has been changed to noarch due to RPM lint errors, although there are arch-dependent dependencies. The exclusion of ppc64 is due to no eclipse-cdt on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182102.n1IL2pSW006893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Suravee Suthikulpanit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |suravee.suthikulpanit at amd.c | |om --- Comment #1 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-02-18 16:02:50 EDT --- This is an un-official pre-review. - May I suggest append "%{dist}" at the end of release string. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182111.n1ILB90e008928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cheekyboinc at foresightlinux. | |org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-02-18 16:11:07 EDT --- ++ REVIEW ++ MUST: rpmlint output | GOOD rpmlint fedora-ksplice-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint fedora-ksplice-0.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: package must be named according to Package Naming Guidelines | GOOD MUST: The spec file name must match the base package | GOOD MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines | GOOD MUST: licensed with a Fedora approved license | GOOD License: GPLv3 MUST: License field must match the actual license | GOOD MUST: Docs (with license) | GOOD AUTHORS COPYING README MUST: The spec file must be written in American English | GOOD MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible | GOOD MUST: md5sum | GOOD src.rpm: 8b6a7bbc5a1d14bd53b62fd405056fc2 fedora-ksplice-0.5.tar.gz upstream: 8b6a7bbc5a1d14bd53b62fd405056fc2 fedora-ksplice-0.5.tar.gz MUST: compile and build on at least one primary architecture. | GOOD http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1136624 MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires | GOOD MUST: not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing | GOOD MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly | GOOD MUST: Package is working | GOOD APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182113.n1ILDgFU009443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-02-18 16:13:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/maxr.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/maxr-0.2.4-2.fc10.src.rpm automake was obsolete, so i removed it and the BR. automake was used in older releases of maxr. The other points are also fixed. Thank you for your comment! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182113.n1ILDMOn009375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 16:13:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-ksplice Short Description: Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux Owners: s4504kr Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182118.n1ILIHdZ010818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-18 16:18:15 EDT --- I see that you dropped the ppc64 ExcludeArch. I think this is for the best. If the CDT starts building on ppc64 (an upstream issue AFAIK) then this will not need any changes. If it doesn't, you may just have builds that fail in koji if the ppc64 builder is chosen for your noarch package. Hopefully that won't happen too often. Other issues have been dealt with and rpmlint is now silent on both the SRPM and noarch RPM. I think we're good to go here. Thanks! APPROVED. Please follow the procedure here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process which, as a next step has you follow this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:20:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:20:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485642] Review Request: perl-FCGI-ProcManager - A FastCGI process manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182120.n1ILKGKY011429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485642 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 16:20:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486000] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Changes - View a module's Changes file from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182120.n1ILKA4M011280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486000 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 16:20:09 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486016] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-RT - Check for rt.cpan.org tickets from within the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182120.n1ILKDWm011319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486016 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 16:20:12 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485993] Review Request: perl-CPANPLUS-Shell-Default-Plugins-Diff - Diff module versions from the CPANPLUS shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182120.n1ILK7LK011244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485993 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-18 16:20:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182135.n1ILZMPC015144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-18 16:35:21 EDT --- Good: + Men? looks fine. + Automake and autoconf stuff are removed. + Koji build works fine. Bad: - PleasGood: + Men? looks fine. + Automake and autoconf stuff are removed. Bad: - Please write GPLv2+ and GFDL on the license tag. This is not a dual-licensing case e write GPLv2+ and GFDL on the license tag. This is not a dual-licensing case If you fix this last minor complaint, you are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485963] Review Request: perl-MooseX-GlobRef-Object - Store a Moose object in glob reference In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182137.n1ILbKNn015494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485963 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182140.n1ILeJ7x016240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-02-18 16:40:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maxr Short Description: A classic turn-based strategy game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182154.n1ILs6AB019903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 16:54:05 EDT --- Bad: 1. The version in the changelog, should be 3.0-4, not 3.0.4. 2. The sums don't match to upstream: Upstream SHA1: aeb7887cb4935756cf77deb1ea86973dff0e32fb Your tarball's SHA1: fb2476bf83cbd14f2030c7c66b7485e49e36671c 3. There is a static lib in the -devel package. Unless we have a good reason, we don't package static libs: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries 4. Devel packages should require the main package (Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}) Good: - rpmlint checks return: wordnet.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.0.4 ['3.0-4.fc11', '3.0-4'] - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - no .la files I'd also prefer if you didn't wildcard everything so broadly in %files. That approach leads to extra files getting packaged upon updates without noticing it. Clean up the bad items, and I'll give this another pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 21:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485967] Review Request: perl-MooseX-LazyLogDispatch - Logging Role for Moose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182159.n1ILxqEJ021152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485967 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182210.n1IMA9cJ024066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 17:10:07 EDT --- I'm looking at this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182209.n1IM9qRF023674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182212.n1IMCXfG023883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-18 17:12:32 EDT --- Matthias, is there a newer elisa-base? I can't build this SRPM without it. [spot at velociraptor ~]$ rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/elisa-plugins-bad.spec error: Failed build dependencies: elisa-base = 0.5.28 is needed by elisa-plugins-bad-0.5.28-1.fc11.src -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182230.n1IMUlgc028393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182254.n1IMssJa001897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 --- Comment #1 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-18 17:54:53 EDT --- Koji build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1136856 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] New: Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 Summary: Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/indi-apogee.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/indi-apogee-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The INDI (Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface) driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs. This package build only in rawhide, it depends in libindi-static that is provided only by libindi in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481494] Renaming review: =?utf-8?q?_unikurd-web-font_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=87=92_kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182256.n1IMuECn002050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 22:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182257.n1IMvwH9002774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-18 17:57:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review (In reply to comment #1) > xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines and Python Packaging Guidelines > + Is 'Requires: wireless-tools' really needed? I could not locate its use > in the sources, and it seems to work without it too: removed. > xx - License field meets actual license > + Going by the license notices in the source code: > (i) examples/pyiwlist.py is under GPLv2+. > (ii) examples/pyiwconfig.py, pythonwifi/iwlibs.py, pythonwifi/flags.py > is under LGPLv2+. > (iii) the others do not have a license notice. > Although it looks like the value of the License tag should be LGPLv2+ > it would be good to point out the mix-up to the upstream maintainer. changed to LGPLv2+ > xx - sources match upstream sources > + The Source0 URL should be > > http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz fixed Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-wifi.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485693] Review Request: mythes-da - Danish thesaurus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182301.n1IN1uhP003880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485693 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182306.n1IN6CRY004625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-18 18:06:11 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182316.n1INGMdr007445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 --- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-18 18:16:21 EDT --- I'm adding you, Kevin, to the CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182319.n1INJfIo008033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-18 18:19:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-clock Short Description: Clock activity for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182317.n1INHDho007481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-18 18:17:12 EDT --- thanks for the hint about the rpath. I will try to fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182334.n1INY7QX011301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #38 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 18:34:06 EDT --- Dear CVS admins: This is the account I signed up with as josephsmidt at gmail.com, my Fedora Account Email. (You will find that josephsmidt at gmail.com is taken since it is this account) I have changed the changelog in the .spec to reflect the gmail address. I verified with this account that jsmidt at fedoraproject.org also works, and now that is the only email it shows. I have emailed the bugzilla people about it. Here are the new sources: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/scitools-0.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:48:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182348.n1INmIU4014698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-18 18:48:17 EDT --- Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:47:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182347.n1INlrDu014626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-18 18:47:51 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 18 23:50:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902182350.n1INoPHu015329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-18 18:50:23 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Symlink warnings but OK based on explanation - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Ok. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190006.n1J06lNJ018890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-18 19:06:46 EDT --- We'll want to push grouped libindi, libapogee, indi-apogee updates to F9 and F10 once this passed review. If you prepare libindi builds for F9 and F10 with the necessary changes, I'll ask Rex Dieter to tag it into the buildroots (or you can just ask him directly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190020.n1J0Kgit021993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190031.n1J0VnOH024719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |smparrish at shallowcreek.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |smparrish at shallowcreek.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-18 19:31:47 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Package Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] New: Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Summary: Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-4.fc10/terminus-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-4.fc10/terminus-fonts-4.28-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Terminus Font is designed for long (8 and more hours per day) work with computers. Version 4.28 contains 825 characters, covers about 120 language sets and supports ISO8859-1/2/5/7/9/13/15/16, Paratype-PT154/PT254, KOI8-R/U/E/F, Esperanto, many IBM, Windows and Macintosh code pages, as well as the IBM VGA, vt100 and xterm pseudographic characters. The sizes present are 6x12, 8x14, 8x16, 10x20, 12x24, 14x28 and 16x32. The styles are normal and bold (except for 6x12), plus EGA/VGA-bold for 8x14 and 8x16. The font is available for the Linux console and for X11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190050.n1J0ojWD028693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 19:50:44 EDT --- This review request is for renaming the old terminus-font package according to the new font policies (bug 480482). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 00:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] New: Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak-0.09-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Tie::RefHash module can be used to access hashes by reference. This is useful when you index by object, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190117.n1J1HGna001281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #2 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:17:15 EDT --- Releng ticket for removal of the old package: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190119.n1J1JQp8001558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:19:24 EDT --- *** Bug 480482 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190130.n1J1UgZJ004086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #4 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-18 20:30:41 EDT --- Koji scratch build results: dist-f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1137853 dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1137855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190128.n1J1SWg5003589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-18 20:28:31 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/couchdb/couchdb-0.8.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 01:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484808] Review Request: python-linux-procfs - parser classes for information found in /proc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190151.n1J1pmb4008119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484808 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |acme at redhat.com Component|Package Review |python-linux-procfs Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |acme at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190205.n1J25LEP011654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:05:20 EDT --- Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. yes, it works fine after hitting a button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202356] Review Request: terminus-font - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190207.n1J27rYn012232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202356 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486248 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190207.n1J27qXe012207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |202356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190219.n1J2J29l014362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-02-18 21:19:01 EDT --- forgot to get back the flag to avoid a confusion.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 02:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190243.n1J2h7Q5019860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #39 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-18 21:43:05 EDT --- Okay, email is fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 03:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190358.n1J3wt75003177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #12 from Brennan Ashton 2009-02-18 22:58:53 EDT --- Here is an updated spec and srpm: http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tinycc-0.9.24-3.fc10.src.rpm http://bashton.fedorapeople.org/tinycc.spec RPMLINT: tinycc-devel.i386: W: no-documentation tinycc-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib tinycc-static.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. My understanding is that the Error is ok, as it is the same thing that gcc and other compilers do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 06:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] New: Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Summary: Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/levien-inconsolata-fonts/levien-inconsolata-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/levien-inconsolata-fonts/levien-inconsolata-fonts-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print. This is a rename/update of the existing inconsolata-fonts package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 07:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190758.n1J7wEo1014534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 --- Comment #6 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-19 02:58:13 EDT --- Also, I did test the mpQS binary which seemed to work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 07:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190757.n1J7vEUS014441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-19 02:57:12 EDT --- Looks good so far, however: 1. Upstream has a new version 1.0.21, can you update your spec and SRPM? 2. Does this new release enable shared libraries? as it looks like there is code in the .spec file and patches that enable this. What are upstream's plans on this? In the meantime I did a preliminary review which I will recheck upon upgrading to the newer upstream. Did koji scratch build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1138697 +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, N/A =: not applicable to this package MUST Items: [x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint flint-1.0.18-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint flint-devel-1.0.18-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm flint-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint flint-1.0.18-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [x] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [x] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [x] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [x] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. (no license file included) [x] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [x] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [x] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum flint-1.0.18.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/flint-1.0.18.tar.gz a16ce740c16b296a331ee68a94bc0305 flint-1.0.18.tar.gz a16ce740c16b296a331ee68a94bc0305 rpmbuild/SOURCES/flint-1.0.18.tar.gz [x] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. see koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1138697 [x] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [x] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [N/A] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [x] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [x] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [x] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [N/A] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [N/A] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [x] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [x] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. -devel subpackage supplies a "virtual" provides for the static package, this is OK because -devel only provides static libraries [x] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [x] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [x] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [x] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [x] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [-] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. can you request upstream to include this? (not a blocker) [N/A] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. see koji build [x] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. koji build [] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [N/A] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [N/A] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [N/A] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [N/A] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [x] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:15:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190815.n1J8FFcV018165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 --- Comment #40 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-19 03:15:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scitools Short Description: A Python library for scientific computing Owners: jsmidt Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485893] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Object - NOCpulse Object abstraction for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190831.n1J8VkP8021220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473744] Review Request: flint - Fast Library for Number Theory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190839.n1J8dIj5022218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473744 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-19 03:39:17 EDT --- Sure, I'll update to the new version and send an email to upstream about including license texts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190846.n1J8kPeg023679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |josephsmidt at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190845.n1J8jVrM023554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-19 03:45:30 EDT --- Some other quick comments on your spec file - '--vendor fedora' is obsolete https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files - Isn't 'BuildRequires: gettext' (for translation) and 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme' (for icons) missing? - Unversioned shared libraries should go into a -devel subpackage https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages - Take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database about 'Requires(post)/(postun): desktop-file-utils' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190851.n1J8pMRk024932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-19 03:51:20 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6549 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 08:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478674] Review Request: pp3 - Creation of sky charts in Postscript or PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190859.n1J8x0Eh025717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478674 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481732] Review Request: stardict-dic-cs_CZ - czech dictionary for stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190901.n1J9166v026397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481732 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-19 04:01:04 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. I think it is much better now, thanks. Radek already sponsored you, lifting FE_NEEDSPONSOR. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455168] Review-Request: mon - General-purpose resource monitoring system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190910.n1J9ARJc029561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455168 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-19 04:10:24 EDT --- Imported and build. Thanks for review & CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455174] Review Request: perl-Mon - Mon Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190910.n1J9ANvu029524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455174 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-19 04:10:21 EDT --- Imported and build. Marcela, please do not close the reviews once they are finished, they are only to be closed once the package successfully builds. And thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:18:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486292] New: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl Alias: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-CLAC/perl-NOCpulse-CLAC.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-CLAC/perl-NOCpulse-CLAC-1.9.8-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This packages provides a framework for writing command line oriented applications. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190930.n1J9U9IQ001555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #4 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-19 04:30:08 EDT --- Can you update taking into account comment #3? and I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190940.n1J9eRB8004013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-19 04:40:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) ... > Bad: > - Package should have 'ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}' Golly! It contains i386 assembly code. Oh, how Enterprisey! :) I'll fix that, in next spin of the package (probably after I fix the openssl issue and we agree on the split of documentation) > - Package should use desktop-file-install as described in the > packaging guildlines > - Start of the application caused the following error messages: > SSLLoadSharedLibrary: Failed to load library > libcrypto.so.0.9.8:/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8: Kann die Shared-Object-Datei > nicht ?ffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden > SSLLoadSharedLibrary: Failed to load library > libcrypto.so.0.9.8:/usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8: Kann die Shared-Object-Datei > nicht ?ffnen: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Hm, hm, hm, for me it worked. Did you build it and run it on different versions? (e.g. F9 vs. Rawhide?). If not, please tell me which release did you compile & run on and. It would be awesome if you could tell me which versions of openssl and openssl-devel did you use, as well as attaching the build log. > - Copyright note in the sources says, that LGPLv2+ is the valid license > specification > for the license tag * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published * by the Free Software Foundation version 2.1 and no later version. This is from brokerDlg.cc. It specifically says "no later version". > - %doc stanza is large. So it may be nice, if you can put > View_Client_Admin_Guide.pdf > and View_Client_Help.pdf in a separate subpackage I would agree, given the package is intended for thin clients, which are usually space-constrained, but looking at the size of binary itself compared to the documentation, I'm quite hesitant to split that: $ du -sh vmware-view doc/*pdf 5.5M vmware-view 528K doc/View_Client_Admin_Guide.pdf 548K doc/View_Client_Help.pdf What do you think? If you still think the split is a good idea, I'll do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190942.n1J9gEIv004540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190951.n1J9pokc006772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-19 04:51:48 EDT --- Here is the review: If the license is ok with spot, then I can approve this. +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, N/A =: not applicable MUST Items: [x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. # rpmlint genus2reduction-0.3-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint genus2reduction-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [x] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [-] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. The .mbox file has the correspondence with the license, which isn't very satisfactory. Is it supposed to be GNU GPL v2 +. Let's see if we can't get a more definitive statement. [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. see above [N/A] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [x] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [x] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [x] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum genus2reduction-0.3.tar.gz /home/alex/rpmbuild/SOURCES/genus2reduction-0.3.tar.gz 46a5816f6c60edc8b3d047aa24a9f99e genus2reduction-0.3.tar.gz 46a5816f6c60edc8b3d047aa24a9f99e rpmbuild/SOURCES/genus2reduction-0.3.tar.gz [x] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. koji build for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139057 [N/A] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [x] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [x] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [x] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [x] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [x] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [x] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [N/A] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [N/A] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [N/A] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [N/A] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [N/A] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [x] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [x] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [-] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. check this, probably not possible since upstream is dead (although the package is being maintained by SAGE devs) [x] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [N/A] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [N/A] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [N/A] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [N/A] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [x] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190952.n1J9q9bS006882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486302] New: Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Summary: Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/8/SRPMS/parrot-0.9.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Parrot is a virtual machine designed to efficiently compile and execute bytecode for dynamic languages. Parrot is the target for Rakudo Perl 6, as well as variety of other languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 09:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902190956.n1J9uifl007758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #15 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-19 04:56:43 EDT --- The elisa-base package comes from the main elisa one. You should be able to locally rebuild both elisa and elisa-plugins-good in order for elisa-plugins-bad to rebuild, install and work. I'll make sure right now that both are up to 0.5.28 in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191024.n1JAO7kP013785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191044.n1JAiJ2h019014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #2 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-19 05:44:18 EDT --- Here is the review: Is there really no base package? Not sure what the best way is to deal with the lack of soname versions here. +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, N/A =: not applicable MUST Items: [-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. # rpmlint eclib-devel-20080310-1.p7.fc11.i586.rpm eclib-static-20080310-1.p7.fc11.i586.rpm /home/alex/RPMS/SRPMS/eclib-20080310-1.p7.fc9.src.rpm eclib-devel.i586: W: no-dependency-on eclib/eclib-libs/libeclib eclib-devel.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libjcntl.so eclib-devel.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/librankntl.so eclib-devel.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/librankntl.so exit at GLIBC_2.0 eclib-devel.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libg0nntl.so eclib-devel.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libcurvesntl.so eclib-static.i586: W: no-documentation eclib-static.i586: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Looks like there needs to be some soname patching perhaps. See the Debian package [-] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Version number issues, the "patch 7" can cause problems. Let's say you increase the patch version and reset the release number to one, then you would have # rpmdev-vercmp 20080310-2.p7 20080310-1.p8 0:20080310-2.p7 is newer but you really want -1.p8 to be newer. This is OK if you always increment the release number as patch version increases. [x] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [x] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [x] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [N/A] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [x] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [x] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [x] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum eclib-20080310.p7.spkg rpmbuild/SOURCES/eclib-20080310.p7.spkg bfef44c232be8cfad5e9cb7030dc1c2e eclib-20080310.p7.spkg bfef44c232be8cfad5e9cb7030dc1c2e rpmbuild/SOURCES/eclib-20080310.p7.spkg [x] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139171 [N/A] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [x] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [N/A] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [-] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. This is related to the soname issues above. [N/A] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [x] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [x] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [x] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [N/A] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [N/A] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [x] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [x] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [x] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [x] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [x] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [N/A] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [x] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [x] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [-] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [N/A] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [N/A] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [N/A] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [N/A] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [N/A] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [-] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. The install probably should use "install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 10:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191047.n1JAlgh5018910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 --- Comment #9 from Alan Pevec 2009-02-19 05:47:41 EDT --- spin-kickstarts is missing reusable kickstart includes: /usr/share/appliance-os/includes/base-pkgs.ks /usr/share/appliance-os/includes/base-post.ks /usr/share/appliance-os/includes/repo-rhel5.ks /usr/share/appliance-os/includes/rhel5-pkgs.ks David, could you propose a patch to spin-kickstarts to include those? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:15:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191115.n1JBF35p026437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191118.n1JBI4WG026012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meyering at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486292] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191117.n1JBH6D0026873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225683] Merge Review: dev86 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191146.n1JBkCRU000689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225683 --- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy 2009-02-19 06:46:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Notes: > > * "BuildRequires: gawk" is redundant (gawk is in Exceptions list > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ). Not an > issue, though. Removed. > * Looks like this package disallows parallel builds. You should add note about > it. Yup, commented. > * It's a good idea to add notes about patch status - upstreamed (with bz# or > with maillist's link), specific for fedora and therefore shouldn't be > upstreamed, etc Upstream is dead for couple of years AFAIK. > * What the purpose of expression at line 16? /usr/bin/strip tries to strip binaries generated by dev86. This is bad as strip doesn't know their format and fails so it is needed to be removed from __os_install_post. > Other things (except this sorrow situation with RPM_OPT_FLAGS, described above) Fixed. Shipped binaries should now be compiled with RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > - File, containing the text of the license(s), MUST be included in %doc. Added both GPL and LGPL. > +/- Header files must be in a -devel package, but I'm in doubts whether this > rule can or cannot be applied in this case. And the next one. > +/- Static libraries must be in a -static package. See note above. Better not trying to fix this. This package is in many cases special and doesn't match the ordinary -devel and -static like packaging scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191145.n1JBjCS1000321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-19 06:45:11 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f11 / i586, x86_64, ppc, ppc64 [x] Rpmlint output clean [-] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji. - koji dist-f11 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === SUMMARY === APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483853] Review Request: tcl-trf - Tcl extension providing "transformer" commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191149.n1JBn3A2000888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483853 --- Comment #1 from Vinagre 2009-02-19 06:49:02 EDT --- Thanks, Hope this will be added soon, I need this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 11:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191159.n1JBxUMe003249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #2 from Jess Portnoy 2009-02-19 06:59:29 EDT --- Thank you for your review, Christian. New src.rpm is available from: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-2.src.rpm Spec file URL is still: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 12:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225683] Merge Review: dev86 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191218.n1JCII59008365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225683 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-19 07:18:16 EDT --- OK, this package is APPROVED. What should I do next? I guess, that I should simply close this ticket, since the package already in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 12:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191222.n1JCMVNj009874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-19 07:22:30 EDT --- There was initial attempt to package this title (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 ), so, please, contact Steven Pritchard in order to better coordinate your efforts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 13:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191341.n1JDfYBm027610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-19 08:41:33 EDT --- looks fine (though the scripts need separate review). There was one "should" I pointed out (add LICENSE), and Fabio said he'd address it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 13:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191351.n1JDpmHu030227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-19 08:51:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: indi-apogee Short Description: indi-apogee Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 13:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191353.n1JDratU031740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-19 08:53:35 EDT --- In order to address the LICENSE file missing, I'll have to release a new upstream tarball. It will happen this week so i don't think is a big blocker. Jim, thanks a lot for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 13:52:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:52:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191352.n1JDqZMw031585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #31 from D Haley 2009-02-19 08:52:29 EDT --- Apologies for delay in the response, haven't had a chance to look at this in the past few days. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-10.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-10.fc10.src.rpm Scratch: F9:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139730 F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139731 $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-10.fc10.src.rpm flexdock.spec ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-10.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. >#Licence is MIT on their website, Apache in their LICENSE.txt >License: MIT and ASL 2.0 >Wrong. LICENSE.txt is actually word-for-word MIT: >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Modern_Style_with_sublicense Fixed. >Doesn't build on F-9/x86_64 and F-9/i386 (java bug?). Between changes from my earlier f-9 srpms to now, a new buildrequires was needed. Added: BuildRequires: ant-apache-regexp Hence the build for F9 is now fixed. >That '/' at the end is not necessary. Also the patch file name has a redundant >'patch' in it, same for others. I don't see the problem with having such things there, but to aid review process I have removed these. >Why is the above necessary instead of: >echo "sdk.home=%{_jvmdir}/java-1.6.0" > workingcopy.properties Changed. This was based upon a jpackage script. >BuildRequires: jpackage-utils >is listed twice. >Also see the attached patch for more cosmetic fixes. Applied, with thanks. >Is java-1.6 (not older and not newer) strictly required? No, this was part of the hack. Changed to java-devel, java and %{_jvmdir}/java -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 14:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191406.n1JE6Ro9002403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-19 09:06:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: indi-apogee Short Description: The INDI (Instrument Neutral Distributed Interface) driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs. Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 14:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191409.n1JE9edc003016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meyering at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 14:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191410.n1JEAIJp003499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-02-19 09:10:17 EDT --- You could also try to ask upstream to clarify the situation regarding the license of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 14:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191419.n1JEJbOW006822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-02-19 09:19:35 EDT --- BTW the url tag is incorrect: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qtl/index.html This page shows again a GPLv2+ license, I think you should ask upstream :) And there is also a new release of R/qtl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 15:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480887] Review Request: kguitar - Guitar Tabulature Music Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191510.n1JFAe9N020447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480887 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-19 10:10:38 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 15:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191513.n1JFDfCw020609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-19 10:13:40 EDT --- I have updated the spec/srpm following your comments, at: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin-3.spec http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin-0.13-3.fc10.src.rpm The build results for F-10 and F-11 are at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139769 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139841 > --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-19 03:45:30 EDT --- [...] > > - '--vendor fedora' is obsolete Right. Removed. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files > - Isn't 'BuildRequires: gettext' (for translation) I believe this is in the Requires of intltool that is BuildRequire'ed by Marlin already. > and 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme' (for icons) missing? I believe this is in the Requires of gtk2 that is BuildRequired'd by Marlin already. > - Unversioned shared libraries should go into a -devel subpackage Ah, in theory yes. But I did talk with upstream about this and he doesn't want to have a devel package yet, even though the architecture of marlin is done so that external apps can benefit from it's internal libraries. The reason is that the internal libraries are still a moving target so he can't guarantee any API/ABI compatibility yet. When he can do that, we can start shipping a -devel package I think. Does this make any sense ? > - Take a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > about 'Requires(post)/(postun): desktop-file-utils' > Okay. Thanks. I removed the 'Requires(post)/(postun): desktop-file-utils'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 15:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191548.n1JFmlHG029971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-19 10:48:46 EDT --- Ian: I see you've attempted the builds, but still haven't clarified the situation with the License. Your build failed on ppc, please don't trigger any more builds until the problem with license is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 15:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486390] New: Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 Summary: Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hedayat at grad.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/simspark_review/0.1-1/simspark.spec SRPM URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/simspark_review/0.1-1/simspark-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Spark is a physical simulation system. The primary purpose of this system is to provide a *generic* simulator for different kinds of simulations. In these simulations, agents can participate as external processes. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1139976 Rpmlint output: Doesn't report any errors for src.rpm and spec files. But for rpm packages: simspark.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/simspark/fonts/VeraMono.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf simspark.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/simspark/fonts/VeraMono.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf simspark-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Due to the new font packaging guidelines, this package doesn't contain any font files and it points to a font from dejavu-fonts-sans-mono package instead. And this package requires dejavu-fonts-sans-mono because of this. Extra comments: In the latest version of rcssserver3d package (rcssserver3d-0.6 package is already in Fedora), this package is split into some sub-packages by upstream. Two main sub-packages are simspark and rcssserver3d. simspark package provides core libraries which were previously part of rcssserver3d package. But since simspark is a generic simulation framework and not soccer specific, it is provided as a separate package now. So, the next version of rcssserver3d package (version 0.6.1 and later versions) will depend on this package. A question: Because of this separation, this package have a few files in /usr/bin which conflicts with rcssserver3d-0.6. (But rcssserver3d-0.6.1 won't have any conflicting files with simspark package). Therefore, users which simply update rcssserver3d will not face any problems, but if someone which has rcssserver3d-0.6 decides to install simspark, he can't do that since these packages have some conflicting files. Should I add a Conflicts: section to simspark spec file?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 16:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483620] Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191601.n1JG1Z3w001261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483620 --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac 2009-02-19 11:01:28 EDT --- Updated files: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libbind.spec http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libbind-6.0-0.2.b1.fc11.src.rpm libbind.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bind-libs Well, I don't think it is wise to put Provides: bind-libs to spec. "Old" bind-libs contained both bind-libs and libbind files. Some libraries have been splitted to libbind but some libraries are still in bind-libs. Due this reason I think we should not provide bind-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 15:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191557.n1JFvaOQ032630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(adam at antistof.dk) | --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-19 10:57:34 EDT --- Now closing. If someone wants to import this package, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 16:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191621.n1JGLFi0005718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-19 11:21:13 EDT --- Fabian, correct me if I'm wrong, but gtk2 being a BuildRequires won't actually pull hicolor-icon-theme into Requires. If the end user doesn't build the package himself/herself they will never receive hicolor-icon-theme. So I believe you still need that for Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226601] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-jamstudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191709.n1JH96Ht016859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226601 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(krh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 12:09:05 EDT --- Closing as this package is being dropped from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226587] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dmc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191714.n1JHEh0t018691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226587 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 12:14:42 EDT --- This is being dropped from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226584] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-citron In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191714.n1JHEt8i018714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226584 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 12:14:54 EDT --- This is being dropped from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226589] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-dynapro In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191714.n1JHETAJ018079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226589 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 12:14:28 EDT --- This is being dropped from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191729.n1JHT8F1020779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-19 12:29:06 EDT --- Update adds some missing BuildRequires. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.91-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191729.n1JHT6Vu020743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libmapi - |Review Request: OpenChange |OpenChange: Microsoft |- Microsoft Exchange access |Exchange access with native |with native protocols |protocols | --- Comment #18 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-19 12:29:02 EDT --- Update adds some missing BuildRequires. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191738.n1JHcxFC022981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Jose Luis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |joseluisblancoc at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485607] Review Request: scitools - A Python library for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191747.n1JHl8eD025182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485607 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 12:47:07 EDT --- Thanks! cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191747.n1JHlAGR024178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|joseluisblancoc at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-19 12:47:09 EDT --- Ah... you can't assign what you submitted to yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 18:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191801.n1JI1QO6027974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-19 13:01:25 EDT --- > --- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-19 11:21:13 EDT --- > Fabian, correct me if I'm wrong, but gtk2 being a BuildRequires won't actually > pull hicolor-icon-theme into Requires. Right, sorry. I miss-read what Fabian said. I thought he was saying hicolor-icon-theme was missing in Requires. My bad. I will update the package then. Were my other comments correct ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 17:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191758.n1JHwjks026545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 18:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191810.n1JIAbtl029166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-19 13:10:35 EDT --- Assigning to myself. Some notes. * SourceURL - I recomment to use %{version} tag in Source because with this you probably won't have to modify SourceURL when the version is upgraded, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * Description ----------------------------------------------------------- It is free software and distributed under the GNU General Public License Version 2, which can find in the file COPYING. ----------------------------------------------------------- - is not needed because we can check this by "License" tag in the rebuilt rpm. - I also think that ----------------------------------------------------------- It is written using the Qt library by Trolltech. ----------------------------------------------------------- is not needed. * Desktop file issue - From build.log ----------------------------------------------------------- + desktop-file-install --dir /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cutecom-0.20.0-2.fc11.i386/usr/share/applications/ /builddir/build/BUILD/cutecom-0.20.0/cutecom.desktop /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/cutecom-0.20.0-2.fc11.i386/usr/share/applications/cutecom.desktop: warning: value "" for key "Path" in group "Desktop Entry" does not look like an absolute path ----------------------------------------------------------- I guess Path= item in cutecom.desktop is not needed. - By the way, cutecom.desktop does not have any Categories. Please add the proper one. ? cutecom.desktop specifies "openterm" as Icon, however gnome-icon-theme 2.25.91 does not have openterm.{png,svg} (2.24.x had this icon). Maybe with formal 2.26 gnome-icon-theme release openterm.{png,svg} will reintroduced again, however it may be better that you change Icon item to "utilities-terminal" (actually in gnome-icon-theme 2.24.x, openterm.{png,svg} was symlinks to utilities-terminal.{png,svg}. ? Also please check is the empty line "MimeType=" in cutecom.desktop is needed. If this "MimeType=" line can be removed, then calling "update-desktop-database" on scriptlets is no longer needed, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 18:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225659] Merge Review: cracklib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191842.n1JIgbE6003014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225659 --- Comment #6 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-02-19 13:42:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > cracklib-dicts.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > This is true, but I don't really see a problem in what you're doing. Does > anything absolutely require those symlinks to be there? If it didn't, you > could conceivably make this subpackage noarch (once the buildsys support for > that is finished). The FascistCheck() function in the library takes an absolute path to the dictionaries to check, so there's an unknown number of packages out there that hard-code locations under /usr/lib /usr/lib64 (though, come to think of it, there could be some mistakenly referencing /usr/lib on 64-bit systems... ugh). > It also complains about a couple of things which could do with fixing: > > cracklib-dicts.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The standard CrackLib > dictionaries. > Terribly minor, but perhaps worth fixing if you're in the spec. Agreed, fixed. > cracklib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cracklib-unpacker > ['/usr/lib64'] > cracklib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cracklib-packer > ['/usr/lib64'] > cracklib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/cracklib-check > ['/usr/lib64'] > cracklib-python.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/_cracklibmodule.so ['/usr/lib64'] > I don't know why these didn't turn up earlier. Maybe libtool2 actually makes > things worse? In any case, the recommended hack of tweaking libtool didn't > help, so I guess a call to chrpath is needed. Weird indeed. A local rebuild seems to keep cracklib-packer from being afflicted again, so I'm going to check in the summary change and throw it at the build system. ... Hmm, looks good from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 18:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191857.n1JIvhFC006467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Jose Luis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 18:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191859.n1JIxphM006702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #11 from Till Maas 2009-02-19 13:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Is there a reason why RELEASES and README are not included in %doc? Beside the > %doc stuff I see no further blocker, package APPROVED. I agree that the file RELEASES should be included, but the file README only includes installation information, that do not help Fedora users. > The usage of 'redhat-starthere' is a bit problematic but I guess that if the > icon is missing there is no icon showing up in menu. Let's wait for the icon > from the ArtTeam. So should I just use the redhat-starthere icon in the .desktop but not add a dependency to fedora-icon-theme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 18:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191858.n1JIwEVR006546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #31 from Jose Luis 2009-02-19 13:58:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mrpt Short Description: Libraries and programs for mobile robot SLAM and navigation Owners: joseluisblancoc Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191904.n1JJ4YTi007465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225659, which changed state. Bug 225659 Summary: Merge Review: cracklib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225659 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225659] Merge Review: cracklib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191904.n1JJ4XDF007440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225659 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nalin at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 14:04:32 EDT --- I know there was a problem with libtool and rpath which has been fixed very recently (in 2.2.6-10) and indeed when I build this package now the rpath issue is gone. So I'd say that everything looks good to me, and I'll twiddle the flags and close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191912.n1JJCVXL009711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-19 14:12:30 EDT --- New Release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/pdftk/pdftk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/pdftk/pdftk-1.41-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191920.n1JJKWg0012134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-19 14:20:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332614) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332614) Buildl log from fedora-10-i386 mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483838] Review Request: vmware-view-open-client - Client for Windows desktops managed by VMware View In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191918.n1JJIRAi011397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483838 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-02-19 14:18:26 EDT --- I have make a mock build for F-10 and install the i386 package on a x86_64 system. openssl-devel-0.9.8g-12.fc10.i386 on mock and of the system on which I have installed the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191926.n1JJQkY4013345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 14:26:42 EDT --- I went and whined in that bug and it seems to have been fixed. I'm not sure why someone who understood the problem didn't do that, but in any case the rpath problems are gone from this package after a rebuild (which will happen automatically next week anyway). So, APPROVED. I'll close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191943.n1JJhqZN016034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 --- Comment #9 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-19 14:43:50 EDT --- As koji seems not closing this bug, I do it manualy. (gestikk is now in stable repository). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457304] Review Request: gestikk - Mouse gestures for you to easily control your PC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191944.n1JJislD016212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457304 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191946.n1JJkFT3016849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-02-19 14:46:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: squeak-image Short Description: Standard Squeak image as distributed by squeak.org. Owners: gavin Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: gavin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191944.n1JJi5ME016714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-02-19 14:44:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: etoys Short Description: It is a media-rich authoring environment built on Squeak Owners: gavin Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: gavin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191943.n1JJh7Va016602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-02-19 14:43:05 EDT --- As koji seems not closing this bug, I do it manualy. (posterazor is now in stable repository). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191952.n1JJqdTF018582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-02-19 14:52:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: squeak-vm Short Description: Squeak is an implementation of the Smalltalk Owners: gavin Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: gavin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 19:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902191959.n1JJx4sC019401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause 2009-02-19 14:59:03 EDT --- Thanks for the new packages. Here is a more detailed review: Most issues are resolved besides some minor documentation issue and the static library. GOOD: * Rpmlint rpmlint SRPMS/argtable2-10-2.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/argtable2-10-2.fc10.i386.rpm RPMS/i386/argtable2-debuginfo-10-2.fc10.i386.rpm RPMS/i386/argtable2-devel-10-2.fc10.i386.rpm SPECS/argtable2.spec 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Package name, spec file name and upstream package name match * Download via spectool -r works * Packaged tarball matches upstream (md5sum: 2ea4cd1b55ee250baa37a42b255ae426) * License tag GPLv2+ matches the source (Although I've checked only a couple of files) * License GPLv2+ is acceptable for Fedora * License file packaged in %doc * Mock build successfully (F10) * Koji scratch build successful for all archs on F10 and F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1140640 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1140678 * No build dependencies besides base system * No locales included, so no locale handling needed * Package contains libraries, ldconfig is called in %post and %postun * %defattr used for all packages * %clean section exists * *.la files deleted * Macros correctly used * Header in -devel package * *.so link in -devel package * -devel package requires fully versioned base package * rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install and %clean NEED WORK: * examples are included in both base and -devel package * other files /usr/share/doc/argtable2 should be better packaged in %doc of the devel package * static libraries are shipped in devel package: please have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries and either put the static library in a -static package or remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 20:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483615] Review Request: CodeAnalyst - Performance Analysis Suite for AMD-based System (based on Oprofile) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192007.n1JK7QkI021931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483615 --- Comment #9 from Suravee Suthikulpanit 2009-02-19 15:07:25 EDT --- I have posted the new SRPM and spec files here: Spec URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-2.fc11/CodeAnalyst-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://ftp-developer.amd.com/user/ssuthiku/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-2.fc11/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-2.fc11.src.rpm (From a scratch build against fc11 on Koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1140372) rpmlint output: # rpmlint CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm CodeAnalyst-gui.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/codeanalyst CodeAnalyst-gui.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/codeanalyst CodeAnalyst-gui.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name codeanalyst 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - The first two warnings is explained in "comment #5" above. - The third warning complains about the naming of "/etc/rc.d/init.d/codeanalyst" script, and suggesting that it should be changed to "codeanalyst-gui" to match the package name. However, I would like to keep this name as it does not make sense to name the script "codeanalyst-gui" to match the package name. This script is also used in the upstream CodeAnalyst distribution. The reason I name the package "CodeAnalyst-gui" is to differentiate the normal CodeAnalyst distribution which contains other components such as a modified version of Oprofile and the kernel modules. - The upstream tarball is now available at (http://developer.amd.com/media/CALinuxSnapshot/CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38.tar.gz) Thank you, Suravee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 20:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192021.n1JKL2e2024375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 15:21:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 20:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192021.n1JKLnBc024573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 15:21:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 20:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192017.n1JKHnsl023552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cheekyboinc at foresightlinux. | |org Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 15:17:47 EDT --- The upstream README says GPLv3 or later... shouldn't the tag in the spec be 'GPLv3+'? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 20:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225847] Merge Review: gnupg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192032.n1JKWSqJ026737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225847 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nalin at redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-02-19 15:32:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Nalin. Here's a review for gnupg. Thanks for that, sorry for the delay. > NEEDSWORK items > > * rpmlint produces several warnings and errors on the srpm Fixed up at various times by various people... looks pretty clean now. > The binary rpm produces one warning: > > $ rpmlint gnupg-1.4.6-4.fc6-results/gnupg-1.4.6-4.fc6.i386.rpm > W: gnupg file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/gpg.ru.1.gz > > I don't know Russian so I couldn't verify if iconv would properly converted the > man page so I left it alone. rpmlint says this needs to be UTF-8, but it's evidently KOI8-RU. Converting. > * Scriplets are sane > > The scriptlets to install info pages could be simplified somewhat and made more > consistent with the examples in Packaging/ScriptletSnippets The additional checks fix #91641 (error when installed with --excludedocs). I'd rather just leave it as-is and not have to worry about that. > Comments/Questions/Notes > > There are a number of unneeded configure flags to enable zlib, bzip, readline, > and curl. These are all enabled by default in the current gnupg so they can be > removed. Dropped explicit requests for bzip, readline, and curl, but leaving the one for zlib in so that configure won't fall back to the internal copy if something looks "off" about the system one. > Why is %{_libdir} used for %{_libexecdir}? Packaging/Guidelines allow the use > of this dir and it is what upstream does by default. %{_libdir}/gnupg is used > for extensions, though none are currently shipped with this package (or by any > others in Fedora AFAIK). We used to not allow %{_libexecdir}. Reverted. > Another very a minor point, the preferred value for the BuildRoot tag is > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > This is not a blocker. Changed to match at some point. I think it looks pretty good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 21:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192109.n1JL9ND6001566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Elliott Baron changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Elliott Baron 2009-02-19 16:09:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-valgrind Short Description: Eclipse plugins to integrate the Valgrind tool suite into the workbench. Owners: ebaron Branches: F-10 InitialCC: overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 21:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192109.n1JL9o71001643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-19 16:09:49 EDT --- Finally, we can review this package :) Here are my notes: * rpmlint says pdftk.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 30, tab: line 1) pdftk.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: pdftk-1.41-rpmopt.patch pdftk.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: pdftk-1.41-system-libgcj.patch pdftk.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: pdftk-1.41-gcjh.patch - We can get rid of those patches that are commented out. We will not need them anymore. - The mixed spaces/tabs is easy to fix. * The package needs BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 otherwise, it will not build with mock. * rm -rf java_libs/gnu_local java_libs/java_local java_libs/gnu can be replaced with just rm -rf java_libs * The guidelines say: "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." So I think, we should remove Source1. * %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. * There is a convenient %{_javadir} macro. You can replace the instances of /usr/share/java %{_datadir}/java with %{_javadir} Sorry, this one is my bad. I should have told you this properly before. * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 21:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481676] blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192138.n1JLc3D8007819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481676 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-19 16:38:02 EDT --- I saw you've tweaked the blender-wrapper script on devel, I will test again soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 21:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481676] blender-wrapper doesn't tweak the user script directory as appropriate. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192145.n1JLj69X009714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481676 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 22:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] New: Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Summary: Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: geoffrey.levand at am.sony.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cell.gotdns.org/pub/ps3-utils-rpm/ps3-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://cell.gotdns.org/pub/ps3-utils-rpm/ps3-utils-2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: An updated version of the ps3pf-utils package. The current ps3pf-utils is very old, and some options are no longer compatible with the newer ps3-utils. Updates ps3pf-utils-2.1 to ps3-utils-2.3. This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. David Woodhouse was maintaining ps3pf-utils, but he is no longer doing that. I will take over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 22:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486476] New: Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-power-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xfce Power Manager uses the information and facilities provided by HAL to display icons and handle user callbacks in an interactive Xfce session. Xfce Power Preferences allows authorised users to set policy and change preferences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 22:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192236.n1JMaOft017913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #5 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-02-19 17:36:23 EDT --- ping... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 22:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902192259.n1JMx5VP021494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 --- Comment #5 from Jose Luis 2009-02-19 17:59:04 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru! > Ah... you can't assign what you submitted to yourself. Okay... wasn't sure about that! > SourceURL Changes to %{name}-%{version} > Description Shortened. > Desktop file. This file has many issues... I've finally left it as: desktop-file-install --remove-key=Path --remove-key=Encoding --remove-key=BinaryPattern --remove-key=TerminalOptions --add-category=System --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/ $(pwd)/cutecom.desktop which fixes almost everything. The only remaining detail is the icon, but I'm not sure on whether it can be changed via desktop-file-install, or I should modify it "manually" (via 'sed', etc...) from the script. The new revision is here: SPEC: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/cutecom.spec SRPM: http://babel.isa.uma.es/mrpt/src-repo/rpm/cutecom-0.20.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 23:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] New: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Gnome2/perl-Gnome2.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Gnome2/perl-Gnome2-1.042-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Gnome2 module allows a perl developer to use the Gnome libraries. Find out more about Gnome+ at http://www.gnome.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 23:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] New: Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Object-Event/perl-Object-Event.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Object-Event/perl-Object-Event-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module was mainly written for Net::XMPP2, Net::IRC3, AnyEvent::HTTPD and BS to provide a consistent API for registering and emitting events. Even though I originally wrote it for those modules I released it separately in case anyone may find this module useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 19 23:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] New: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Net-DBus-GLib/perl-Net-DBus-GLib.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Net-DBus-GLib/perl-Net-DBus-GLib-0.33.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Net::DBus::GLib provides an extension to the Net::DBus module allowing integration with the GLib mainloop. To integrate with the main loop, simply get a connection to the bus via the methods in Net::DBus::GLib rather than the usual Net::DBus module. That's it - every other API remains the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 00:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245342] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200019.n1K0Jagp004619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245342 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 19:19:35 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486482 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 00:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200019.n1K0JbOL004644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcantrell at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 19:19:35 EDT --- *** Bug 245342 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 00:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200034.n1K0YGCf006415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 19:34:15 EDT --- I'll review this. Look for a review later tonight or tomorrow... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 01:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200115.n1K1F8cP012813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 01:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200118.n1K1IR3I014056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 20:18:25 EDT --- Removing the blocker on bug # 177841 because I'm going to sponsor Ant. Mamoru, can you approve the package then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 01:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200146.n1K1kRa8018496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 20:46:25 EDT --- The package doesn't build in Rawhide: Processing files: gget-epiphany-extension-0.0.4-7.fc11 error: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-7.fc11.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* The epiphany extension does not get build because configure only checks for epiphany <= 2.24, but rawhide already has 2.25. So you need to patch configure/configure.ac, I will attach a patch. Issues that needed to be fixed according to comment # 23: OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages do not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - %changelog is complete now OK - ChangeLog from source is included in %doc OK - The desktop file contains a mimetype and update-mime-database is run properly. OK - Includes "Requires: dbus" now. OK - Timestamp of Source0 is matching. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gget-* gget.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas gget.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gget/metalink.py 0644 gget.i386: E: no-binary gget.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 68, tab: line 6) gget-epiphany-extension.i386: W: no-documentation gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/epiphany/2.25/extensions/gget-epiphany.py 0644 gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. Two of these need fixing: The non-executable-script error was my fault, please enable the chmod again. The mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning is only cosmetic, but I suggest you ether use spaces or tabs. Personally I prefer spaces, because tabs sometimes look weird in (cvs) diffs. Final Notes: The BR could be reworked to be more precise and more legible: BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel >= 2.10.0 BuildRequires: pygobject2-devel >= 2.12.0 BuildRequires: gnome-python2-devel >= 2.16.0 BuildRequires: gnome-python2-extras >= 2.14.2 BuildRequires: dbus-python-devel >= 0.82 BuildRequires: notify-python >= 0.1.1 BuildRequires: intltool This is what configure really checks for. The versions are not really needed for Fedora because all supported releases are up to date, but they might be helpful for people who want to rebuild the package for EPEL or other older releases. Please add "--add-category=FileTransfer" to desktop-file-install to allow nested menus (we are working on a set of submenu-packages for user who have a lot of stuff installed) The outstanding issues are only minor. Please do one more build to fix them and to apply the patch and I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 01:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:48:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200148.n1K1mFHg017773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 20:48:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332659) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332659) Patch to support epiphany up to 2.26 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 01:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200147.n1K1l2P8017702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 01:47:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:47:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200147.n1K1l10O017678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200206.n1K262b0020930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Warren Togami 2009-02-19 21:06:01 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200203.n1K23p0Y021292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 21:03:50 EDT --- REVIEW for 506fef61941ac763a8bea70a4f98efc0 gigolo-0.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gigolo-* gigolo.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided sion 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. According to the naming guidelines the provides are supposed to be short lived, so IMO the warning can be ignored as sion only was available for a short time. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2 only) and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by MD5 0fb24e019f0a3432d2ab6da6da28b75c OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT- OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK - SHOULD: Timestamp of Source0 matches Issues from comment #1 OK - Fedora specific compilation flags are honored correctly OK - Provides for Sion is not really necessary, see above. OK - "vendor=Fedora" was removed from desktop-file-install Issues from comment #2 The fix only works for rawhide. Any idea what to do with F9/F10? Other issues: - Line breaks in the "waf configure" statement would be nice. - Include THANKS in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200211.n1K2BtqB021952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 David Cantrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from David Cantrell 2009-02-19 21:11:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: calendar Short Description: Reminder utility Owners: dcantrel Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200234.n1K2YE1w025158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 21:34:11 EDT --- I note that this package is in rawhide but doesn't seem to have been pushed to any of the release branches. I see a build for F-10 but nothing for F-9 (not sure how to check EPEL). If you really wanted this package in the release branches, please build it for them and issue updates in bodhi. Otherwise, please go ahead and close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200238.n1K2cN7h025958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 21:38:22 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 923d4dba39b1f313631b636e7b5d772d xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2.tar.bz2 923d4dba39b1f313631b636e7b5d772d xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. rpmlint says: xfce4-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-power-manager.desktop I think this can be ignored. No one should be editing xdg autostart files should they? 2. Don't include a --vendor in the desktop file install, per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Or is --vendor="" the same as no vendor? I don't see any other blockers here... if you can address the --vendor thing before importing that could be good, otherwise this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 02:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200244.n1K2iJUh026881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-19 21:44:18 EDT --- After talking with one of the Fedora waf (co)maintainers and talking with the midori author (which also uses waf), it seems like the expectation for waf using projects is for them to use the included copy of waf and not any system version. So, I think the right thing to do is to just use the included waf in all branches. I can fix the other issues... let me know if you would like a new rpm spun to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 03:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200311.n1K3B68a031613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 22:11:05 EDT --- For me it's ok to use the included waf, at least as long as we have no guidelines for waf usage. I asked at fedora-packaging a week ago, but got no response. No need to build a new package for the outstanding issues as none is a blocker or in the list of things to check on a review. As long as you fix them, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 03:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200323.n1K3NFs8002495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 22:23:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. rpmlint says: > > xfce4-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-power-manager.desktop > > I think this can be ignored. No one should be editing xdg autostart files > should they? No, they people cannot edit them, at least not through xfce4-autostart-editor. I'm afraid if I mark it %config the rpmnew/rpmold files could confuse the autostart. > 2. Don't include a --vendor in the desktop file install, per: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > Or is --vendor="" the same as no vendor? Yes, see https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Guidelines&oldid=49388#desktop-file-install_usage Nevertheless I'll remove it, too. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-power-manager Short Description: Power management for the Xfce desktop environment Owners: cwickert Branches: F11 (needs xfconf, so only F11 will suffice) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 04:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] New: Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/thunar-shares-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/thunar-shares-plugin-0.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Thunar Shares plugin allows you to quickly share a folder using Samba from Thunar (the Xfce file manager) without requiring root access. It's backend is based on nautilus-share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 04:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200430.n1K4U7VM014460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-19 23:30:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1141380 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a6d9daa3091d38a6cfe310100a00b897 Object-Event-0.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=54, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.36 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.44 CPU) + Package perl-Object-Event-0.7-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(Object::Event) = 0.7 perl(Object::Event::Methods) Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 04:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200429.n1K4TvLO014137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-19 23:29:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1141378 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d86fac8abef6781e7f652b1062f474ff Net-DBus-GLib-0.33.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.25 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.30 CPU) + Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib-0.33.0-1.fc11 Provides: GLib.so perl(Net::DBus::GLib) = 0.33.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 perl(Glib) perl(Net::DBus) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) Suggestions: 1)You should drop Net-DBus-GLib.spec file from installing in %doc 2)you can add examples directory in %doc 3)License for this package is of perl variant type "GPLv2+ or Artistic" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 04:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200433.n1K4XAKE014251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-19 23:33:09 EDT --- This is basically a re-review of thunar-shares because the package has been renamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200501.n1K51c0T019216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 Bug 480056 depends on bug 480050, which changed state. Bug 480050 Summary: Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480050] Review Request: libchamplain - Map view for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200501.n1K51b3E019188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480050 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-20 00:01:35 EDT --- Tagged and built for F-10 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200526.n1K5Qqgl023174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200526.n1K5QNYT023117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-20 00:26:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: resource-agents Short Description: Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster Owners: fabbione Branches: devel InitialCC: fabbione -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200534.n1K5YLCA024061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #17 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-20 00:34:19 EDT --- listen also still requires the old libmusicbrainz: bug #486523 please restore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200538.n1K5c7qo025030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 05:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200546.n1K5khOj026112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-20 00:46:42 EDT --- I don't think it is removed. Please see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-February/msg01486.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200600.n1K60ZkM028250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-20 01:00:34 EDT --- Would a README.Fedora or a COPYING.Fedora file noting that this package is distributed by the project under the provisions of the GPLv3 license only, be sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200608.n1K68EHM029531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #19 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-20 01:08:14 EDT --- It was removed from last night's rawhide, at least temporarily: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20090219/logs/repodiff Removed package libmusicbrainz Removed package libtunepimp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200618.n1K6IUvF031267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #20 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-20 01:18:29 EDT --- OK, looks like they were restored in CVS. I'm going to rebuild them for rawhide now, since it seems that Jesse unblocked them from rawhide. Hopefully they'll make it into tomorrow's rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:21:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200621.n1K6Lrus031996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #21 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-20 01:21:52 EDT --- I guess if they are unblocked, it'll revert to the F-10 version of libmusicbrainz and libtunepimp, so it should at least fix the broken deps. Look like libtunepimp doesn't rebuild from source in any case: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1141627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] New: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response Note: This package is required to be able to update perl-WWW-Mechanize. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Lint.spec SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: HTML::Lint Perl module, a pure-Perl HTML parser and checker for syntactic legitmacy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200637.n1K6bXwP001753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #29 from Aurelien Bompard 2009-02-20 01:37:31 EDT --- Ping Ian ? (no pushing, just a heads up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:53:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200653.n1K6r0pj004416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 06:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200652.n1K6qdvD004626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 07:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200733.n1K7XNhX011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-20 02:33:22 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1141722 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bb5880687bfb8b1e220c5c3c2b7d1408 HTTP-Response-Encoding-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=19, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.54 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.61 CPU) + Package perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding-0.05-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(HTTP::Response::Encoding) = 0.5 Requires: perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 07:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200741.n1K7fKvj013090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-20 02:41:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding Short Description: Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 07:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200751.n1K7pbZG014477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-20 02:51:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1141721 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 60bd27c6ff0bb291a9fead0cd474b75f HTML-Lint-2.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=28, Tests=190, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr 0.02 sys + 2.12 cusr 0.10 csys = 2.37 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc11 => Provides: perl(HTML::Lint) = 2.06 perl(HTML::Lint::Error) perl(HTML::Lint::HTML4) perl(HTML::Lint::Parser) perl(Test::HTML::Lint) = 2.06 weblint = 2.06-1.fc11 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Exporter) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::Lint) perl(HTML::Lint) >= 2.06 perl(HTML::Lint::Error) perl(HTML::Lint::HTML4) perl(HTML::Parser) >= 3.20 perl(HTML::Tagset) >= 3.03 perl(Test::Builder) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) Not sure whether you like to document virtual provides of weblint here ->http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/VilleSkytt%C3%A4/VirtualProvides 2) Filter out duplicate requires perl(HTML::Lint) perl(HTML::Lint) >= 2.06 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 08:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200841.n1K8fLCt024129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-20 03:41:20 EDT --- Well, Tom only advised against including the EXCEPTIONS file because "it is of little value to anyone" (quote). That's not enough reason to exclude it. If we did include it, though, we would offer the same dual-/multi-licensing options as the upstream tarball (and our "License: GPLv3+" tag may not be explicit enough to signal our intent). And with that, somebody could choose to accept the dual-licensing and would be bound to term 1.b.ii, which I think is a problem, as for example, we don't do that for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 08:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200842.n1K8g7GZ024258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #31 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-02-20 03:42:04 EDT --- New version 2.3 released. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-2.3-1.fc9.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200901.n1K91jJY028175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-20 04:01:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-Lint Short Description: Perl HTML parser and checker Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k9rB005428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486269 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200946.n1K9k7H1005394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477401 Depends on| |431368 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 04:46:06 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 09:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902200953.n1K9raje006059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.parrot.org --- Comment #2 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-02-20 04:53:35 EDT --- An email to Steven Pritchard is written. I get no answer until now. Should I additional put the email-text as a comment to the id=246348? I produced parrot-0.9.1 rpms (32bit) for Fedora 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11alpha. On a 64bit computer I produced parrot-0.9.1 rpms for Fedora 9. The packages are all stored under the URL ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora//... I would be nice if the packages would be tested. I am not sure if the parrot-0.9.1 packages are installable without problems on other computers. I think the package for Fedora 10 will make trouble. It is a subpackage parrot-docs integrated. I think this subpackage do not need an architectur. But I am not successful to make it as a noarch subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] New: Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Summary: Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/mono-nat-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Mono.Nat is a .NET library used for automatic port forwarding, using either uPnP or nat-pmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201010.n1KAANmN010947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486561 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201010.n1KAALSk010880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |486557, 486558 --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen 2009-02-20 05:10:20 EDT --- Depends on Mono.Nat (review request #486557) and a MonoTorrent update to 0.70 (request #48558) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:08:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/monsoon.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/monsoon-0.20-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:14:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201014.n1KAEDlY010645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |client written in Mono and | |GTK# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201012.n1KAC1Td010393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-20 05:12:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > An email to Steven Pritchard is written. I get no answer until now. Should I > additional put the email-text as a comment to the id=246348? Let's wait for a while - maybe he is at the vacations, maybe he got a lot of work to do. In any case, feel free to add a comments to a previus review request. > I would be nice if the packages would be tested. I am not sure if the > parrot-0.9.1 packages are installable without problems on other computers. I > think the package for Fedora 10 will make trouble. In order to check successful builds of packages, we may use koji (for example, to check whether yourapp.srpm can be built on F-10): koji build --scratch dist-f10 /path/to/yourapp.src.rpm > It is a subpackage parrot-docs integrated. I think this subpackage do not need > an architectur. But I am not successful to make it as a noarch subpackage. Noarch subpackages is the upcoming feature of rpm, so let's wait while necessary functionality will be fully implement and tested. BTW if nobody volunteers, I'll review your package (after we establish communications with Steven to resolve the issue above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201030.n1KAUaBZ013945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 05:30:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Object-Event Short Description: Class that provides an event callback interface Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201029.n1KATniv013551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 05:29:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-DBus-GLib Short Description: Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 10:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201029.n1KAT4LX013449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 05:29:02 EDT --- 1. a fontconfig ruleset would be nice http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#The_fontconfig_stuff_the_font_guidelines_suggest_seems_complex._Can_I_skip_it.3F 2. FPC will want you to use %global not %define soonish http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define 3. Are you sure you want to provide the old name? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F Anyway, nothing here is blocking ??? APPROVED ??? Please do not forget the other steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201104.n1KB4X4F021430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #23 from Bruno Mahe 2009-02-20 06:04:31 EDT --- Thank you very much for this thorough review. I believe I have fixed most of the issues you pointed out. But I don't understand one of them. >From your previous message : "* ldconfig symlinks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ]# ls -al /usr/lib/libBulletCollision* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2009-02-18 00:56 /usr/lib/libBulletCollision.so -> libBulletCollision.so.2.73 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 706252 2009-02-17 00:34 /usr/lib/libBulletCollision.so.2.73 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Usually in this case the (soft) symlink named "libBulletCollision.so.2" which points to libBulletCollision.so.2.73 should also be provided and the symlink (libBulletCollision.so.2) should be included in bullet package (see libjpeg and libjpeg-devel rpms for example)" CMake doesn't generate any libBullet*.so.2. Here is the content of my buildroot if I don't clean it up : lrwxrwxrwx 1 makerpm makerpm 26 2009-02-20 01:56 libBulletCollision.so -> libBulletCollision.so.2.73 -rwxr-xr-x 1 makerpm makerpm 684996 2009-02-20 01:56 libBulletCollision.so.2.73 lrwxrwxrwx 1 makerpm makerpm 25 2009-02-20 01:56 libBulletDynamics.so -> libBulletDynamics.so.2.73 -rwxr-xr-x 1 makerpm makerpm 235368 2009-02-20 01:56 libBulletDynamics.so.2.73 lrwxrwxrwx 1 makerpm makerpm 25 2009-02-20 01:56 libBulletSoftBody.so -> libBulletSoftBody.so.2.73 -rwxr-xr-x 1 makerpm makerpm 225420 2009-02-20 01:56 libBulletSoftBody.so.2.73 lrwxrwxrwx 1 makerpm makerpm 21 2009-02-20 01:56 libLinearMath.so -> libLinearMath.so.2.73 -rwxr-xr-x 1 makerpm makerpm 41196 2009-02-20 01:56 libLinearMath.so.2.73 And my spec file I include %{_libdir}/*.so.* files for the bullet package and %{_libdir}/*.so for bullet-devel. libjpeg spec file is doing similar things. Does that mean I should dig around CMake and make sure files like libBullet*.so.2 are also generated ? I updated the spec file and the SRPM. Spec file : http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet.spec SRPM : http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet-2.73-4.fc10.src.rpm Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201133.n1KBX7kQ028521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-20 06:33:06 EDT --- Please add InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201132.n1KBWUbd028965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-02-20 06:32:26 EDT --- Please add InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483846] Review Request: gsim85 - An 8085 microprocessor simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201138.n1KBcGBN029652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483846 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:38:15 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1537 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479595] Review Request: raddump - RADIUS packets interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201140.n1KBeAjB030637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479595 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:40:08 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0951 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479535] Review Request: gipfel - A tool to find the names of mountains or POI on a picture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201141.n1KBfGKf030952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479535 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:41:14 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1535 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201141.n1KBfeBQ031034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #5 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 06:41:38 EDT --- Let me comment about the rpmlint output (available at http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-4.fc10/rpmlint.txt): terminus-fonts.spec:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. terminus-fonts.src:9: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd/consolefonts A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. The /lib/kbd/consolefonts directory belongs to the kbd package, and the kbd package itself hardcodes it as /lib/..., not /%{_lib} or %{_libdir} or anything with macros. Following rpmlint's suggestions would likely break things. terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/63-terminus.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/63-terminus.conf Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. terminus-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/terminus:unscaled /usr/share/fonts/terminus Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. All the other packages putting symlinks into the /etc/X11/fontpath.d directory also use absolute symlinks, so I am following a common practise here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201140.n1KBeTqi030805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 06:40:28 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source RPM: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak.src: W: invalid-license Artistic) binary RPM:perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic) ==> MUSTFIX: There is a typo in the license tag ( a trailing char) [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 01b07d1e3d43a14160b1b0234f31bcd8a985b559 Tie-RefHash-Weak-0.09.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass ================ *** APPROVED *** (I'll trust you to correct the license tag before commit) ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201142.n1KBgCXk030684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:42:10 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1024 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478447] Review Request: qtgpsc - A client for the gpsd GPS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201144.n1KBijjG031122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478447 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:44:43 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1274 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478452] Review Request: libxnm - A library for parsing the XNM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201144.n1KBi2me030973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478452 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:44:01 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1415 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1392 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478603] Review Request: pysnmp - SNMP engine written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201143.n1KBh3dB030829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478603 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:43:01 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1338 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1202 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201145.n1KBjb3f032089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #9 from Levente Farkas 2009-02-20 06:45:34 EDT --- why? it seems FE-Legal block was released. wouldn't like to reopen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201145.n1KBjVo5032028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:45:29 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1008 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480860] Review Request: timespan - A tool that performs date-based time calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201151.n1KBpYpv000716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480860 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:51:31 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1328 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483499] Review Request: python-ferari - Optimizer for finite element code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201148.n1KBmLto032057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483499 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:48:20 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1332 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483392] Review Request: whohas - Command line tool for query package lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201148.n1KBmegB032134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483392 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:48:38 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1209 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483496] Review Request: python-instant - Python module for instant inlining of C and C++ code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201147.n1KBlVAU031935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483496 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:47:27 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1384 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483162] Review Request: sugar-xomail - Xomail for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201152.n1KBq1Id000931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483162 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:52:00 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483501] Review Request: python-fiat - Generation of arbitrary order instances of the Lagrange elements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201149.n1KBndQi032603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483501 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:49:37 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1210 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201154.n1KBsWQb001415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:54:30 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481513] Review Request: sugar-pippy - Pippy for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201153.n1KBr3fs001141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481513 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:53:02 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481819] Review Request: sugar-finance - Financial planning for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201153.n1KBraK3001407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481819 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:53:34 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483159] Review Request: sugar-xoirc - IRC client for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201152.n1KBqJVm001082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483159 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:52:18 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482951] Review Request: sugar-playgo - Go for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201152.n1KBqcMu001163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482951 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:52:37 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1514 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481524] Review Request: sugar-help - Help and Dokumentation for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201153.n1KBrGCN001292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481524 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:53:15 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480222] Review Request: nullmodem - A utility to loopback pseudo-terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201156.n1KBudTF002324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480222 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:56:37 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1371 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479603] Review Request: shcov - A gcov and lcov coverage test tool for bourne shell / bash scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201155.n1KBtwB8002183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479603 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:55:56 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1089 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201201.n1KC1lNd003606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201200.n1KC0esq003692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |486570 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201200.n1KC0fk6003715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480254] Review Request: deletemail - A non-interactive tool for deleting mails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201201.n1KC1Nkw003875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480254 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 07:01:19 EDT --- Pushed to testing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1549 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1578 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481416] Review Request: viking - GPS data editor and analyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201159.n1KBxB0Y002955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481416 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:59:10 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0956 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480646] Review Request: urlwatch - A tool for monitoring webpages for updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201157.n1KBvxT4002719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480646 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-20 06:57:57 EDT --- Was pushed to stable https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0729 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486570] New: Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/courier/courier-authlib.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/courier/courier-authlib-0.62.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 11:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201158.n1KBwC7r002779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(rhbugs at n-dimensio | |nal.de) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 06:58:11 EDT --- 1. You can safely drop this comment # Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does # update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most # recent file as version. 2. Are you sure you want to keep this Provide? Provides: terminus-font-x11 = 4.28-2 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_Provide_my_old_package_names.3F 3. You can probably use the common_desc trick found in /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec to simplify your spec 4. Group: User Interface/X is a bit ironic for the console package 5. If you only push your package to rawhide (as you should do), I think you can assume filesystem is at the right version Requires: filesystem >= 2.4.11-1 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_change_my_package_in_stable_releases_in_addition_to_Rawhide.2Fdevel.3F 6. FPC will ask you to use globals instead of defines soonish http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define 7. Do you really need to hardcode /etc in the catalog path? 8. It's a bit saner to put Provides/Obsoletes next to other rpm dependency rules (requires/buildrequires) 9. you do not need %dir %{_fontdir} anymore https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10 10. really adding a fontconfig file which is effectively a noop helps no one. Please take a look at the templates in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ they're not hard a all to fill 11. the symlinks warning of rpmlint is totally bogus and FRPC already decided to have it nuked http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486292] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201201.n1KC1SDV003915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 07:01:25 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7964c4b86f30114ebfd0dd8ace4d173e70376083 perl-NOCpulse-CLAC-1.9.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201213.n1KCDVeV007938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 --- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-20 07:13:30 EDT --- I promise this one is correct! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: indi-apogee Short Description: The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs. Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201226.n1KCQWxr010896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 07:26:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Object-Event Short Description: Class that provides an event callback interface Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201224.n1KCOn7t010261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 07:24:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak Short Description: Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201225.n1KCPffK009699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 07:25:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-DBus-GLib Short Description: Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486292] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201223.n1KCN6VM008993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-20 07:23:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC Short Description: NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl Owners: msuchy Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201235.n1KCZEKk013015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-20 07:35:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pyfits New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sergiopr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 12:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201251.n1KCpEYd016723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 07:51:12 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source rpm: empty binary rpm: perl-Gnome2.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl.h perl-Gnome2.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-autogen.h perl-Gnome2.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install/gnome2perl-versions.h => see note 1 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by sources: LGPLv2+ (see Gnome2.pm) License type as specified by spec file: LGPLv2 => please fix before import [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of source file: 8f232afac6ca2e8f6770550e754c857142872a68 Gnome2-1.042.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass ==Notes== I am not sure here. Do we need /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Install in the binary rpm ? If needed, shouldn't it go to a separate devel package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201303.n1KD3rjS019834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-20 08:03:52 EDT --- Michael if you do not mind (and I know you will not :) ) I will take ownership of this package. I really want to thanx you for all the job you are doing. I applied your changes to our git repo. I packed latest version. And make sure the tar.gz landed in fedorahosted.org/releases/ *Test - the test are long time abandoned and definitelly do not work. We keep it there if anybody want to fix it as it is better then just deleting it forever. UPDATED SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnpush/rhnpush.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnpush/rhnpush-0.4.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201312.n1KDCwJR021958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 08:12:57 EDT --- Hi, I found similar packages and the .h files is not in -devel: perl-Gnome2-Canvas: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=473861 perl-Gnome2-Print: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=474966 perl-Gnome2-GConf: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=660415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201323.n1KDN1sb024398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-20 08:22:59 EDT --- OK source files match upstream 3b53e8a569b7e486634482216410669d OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (GPLv2) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142201 OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. What about BR? Is there reason for using %{_bindir}/msgfmt instead of gettext and %{_bindir}/docbook2man instead of docbook-utils? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201324.n1KDOeGG023343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rhbugs at n-dimensio | |nal.de) | --- Comment #7 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:24:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. You can safely drop this comment > # Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does > # update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most > # recent file as version. Dropped. > 2. Are you sure you want to keep this Provide? > Provides: terminus-font-x11 = 4.28-2 No. Dropped. (Turned out not to be useful after all, I had misread the rpm output.) > 3. You can probably use the common_desc trick found in > /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec > to simplify your spec Done. > 4. Group: User Interface/X is a bit ironic for the console package It is, but I cannot see any fitting rpm group. "Application/Text" does not work either, because this is a font, not an application processing text. "System Environment/Base" is the group of the kbd package which contains the other console fonts, but terminus-fonts-console is not a required basic part of the system environment either. So, in the absences of a "Others" group, I don't see a group where this package would really fit into. Groups are not really used any more anyway, as far as I understand it, so it probably has no consequences anyway. If you want the terminus-fonts-console package in a specific, different group, I'm happy to change it, of course. > 5. If you only push your package to rawhide (as you should do), I think you can > assume filesystem is at the right version > Requires: filesystem >= 2.4.11-1 > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Do_I_need_to_change_my_package_in_stable_releases_in_addition_to_Rawhide.2Fdevel.3F Dropped. F-10 shipped a newer filesystem package, and that is all I cared about. > 6. FPC will ask you to use globals instead of defines soonish > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define Changed. > 7. Do you really need to hardcode /etc in the catalog path? No. Changed to %{_sysconfdir}. > 8. It's a bit saner to put Provides/Obsoletes next to other rpm dependency > rules (requires/buildrequires) Done. > 9. you do not need %dir %{_fontdir} anymore > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fontpackages-1.20-1.fc10 Changed: Removed the %dir, and versioned the build requirement for fontpackages-devel. > 10. really adding a fontconfig file which is effectively a noop helps no one. > Please take a look at the templates in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/ they're > not hard a all to fill Added a simple fontconfig file now. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips read as if anything going beyond that empty noop fontconfig file was optional, and did not mention those (really useful) templates. > 11. the symlinks warning of rpmlint is totally bogus and FRPC already decided > to have it nuked > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Symlinks Good. I am ignoring those now. I have uploaded the a version as terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 with all the above changes incorporated: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts.spec http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10.src.rpm http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/terminus-fonts-fontconfig.conf http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-5.fc10/ http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/terminus-fonts-package.git;a=summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201329.n1KDTjk9026233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #8 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:29:44 EDT --- Koji scratch build of terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 for dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142218 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201342.n1KDgRAu027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #9 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:42:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Koji scratch build of terminus-fonts-4.28-5.fc10 for dist-f11: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142218 This failed due to No Package Found for fontpackages-devel >= 1.20 However, now that I have removed the %dir %{_fontdir}, I need to require this version, right? Hmm. The fontpackages-1.20/changelog.txt suggests that requiring 1.18 would be more appropriate, and koji has dist-f11 builds of 1.18 and 1.19, so that should solve it. I'll be uploading and test building terminus-fonts-4.28-6.fc10 with fontpackages-devel >= 1.18 shortly: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/terminus-fonts/4.28-6.fc10/ http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/terminus-fonts-package.git;a=summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486584] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application/perl-CGI-Application.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application/perl-CGI-Application-4.21-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application is an Object-Oriented Perl module which implements an Abstract Class. It is not intended that this package be instantiated directly. Instead, it is intended that your Application Module will be implemented as a Sub-Class of CGI::Application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201347.n1KDl0N3029106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |Framework for building | |reusable web-applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201349.n1KDnYQm001976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #10 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 08:49:32 EDT --- Successful dist-f11 terminus-fonts-4.28-6.fc10 koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1142253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201347.n1KDl0jj001541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-20 08:46:57 EDT --- Hmm, actually there is no reason. And yes, package dependence should be prefered rather then file dependence. UPDATED SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnpush/rhnpush.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnpush/rhnpush-0.4.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:55:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201355.n1KDt8LP004102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 13:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201356.n1KDupgW004640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-20 08:56:50 EDT --- ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 14:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201414.n1KEEkO8009621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-20 09:14:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rhnpush Short Description: Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server Owners: msuchy Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: stahnma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 14:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201417.n1KEHntQ005312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Woerner 2009-02-20 09:17:47 EDT --- Please have a look at iptables-1.4.2-1 in rawhide. 1) License is GPL+, now 2) The old libraries are still static, the new ones are shared. Making the old ones static, could break build scripts and the old libraries should be gone in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 14:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201418.n1KEIvi6005503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 09:18:56 EDT --- package APPROVED. Thanks Marcela for pointing me to the right docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 14:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201423.n1KENkNP006965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-20 09:23:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Gnome2 Short Description: Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 15:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201509.n1KF9iCl024784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 15:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201509.n1KF9mFb024819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de --- Comment #13 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-02-20 10:09:44 EDT --- I wanted to initial packaging Parrot under Fedora. Peter Lemenkov wrote me that there was already an initial attempt to package this title. So we have to coordinate our efforts. I have a working spec-file for the current release of Parrot. Would it be okay we take that? I make parrot-rpms from the version 0.6.1 to the current version (0.9.1). The rpms are stored under the URL ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora and on the Parrot-Download-Web-Site is a link to that URL. The URL of my request is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Gerd Pokorra (gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 15:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201530.n1KFUn9m031160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-20 10:30:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Removing the blocker on bug # 177841 because I'm going to sponsor Ant Thank you. Now I re-reviewed this package and it is still okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (metalink) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 15:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201557.n1KFvV64030831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #17 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-02-20 10:57:28 EDT --- Updated rpm with all the above warnings fixed, plus a few more changes to build cleanly in dist-f10: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/source/dansguardian-2.10.0.2-3.src.rpm http://www.codewiz.org/pub/fedora/specs/dansguardian.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201605.n1KG5n2U007182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |palango at gmx.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paul Lange 2009-02-20 11:05:47 EDT --- This is only an informal review with some things I noticed. Furthermore it's my first review of a non-font package - so expect that I understand some things wrong. * Why do you use ExclusiveArch instead of "ExcludeArch: ppc64"? * %description devel: "contains development and header files...". Does Mono have header files. Maybe something like "The %{name}-devel package contains development files for %{name}." would be more suitable? * Why don't you register the library with gacutil as written in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#Packaging_Tips ? Is this obsolete? * Maybe include the README file as %doc because it includes some hints on how to use the library and there isn't any other documentation yet. That's all for now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201618.n1KGIjGA010486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201642.n1KGgdHc016213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-20 11:42:38 EDT --- Looks good. Some comments. - Would you split a long command line into several lines like below so that we can read it easier line below? ---------------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install \ --remove-key=Path --remove-key=Encoding \ --removekey=BinaryPattern --remove-key=TerminalOptions \ --add-category=System \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/ \ $(pwd)/cutecom.desktop ---------------------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #5) > The only remaining detail is the icon, but I'm > not sure on whether it can be changed via desktop-file-install, or I should > modify it "manually" (via 'sed', etc...) from the script. - You can just use sed (at %prep) ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (cutecom) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201655.n1KGtKwf012410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 11:55:18 EDT --- More a "pong" than a review, I';; be back a bit later: rpmlint of twin: twin.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/setroot.sample twin.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/LICENSING.INFO twin.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/README.twsetroot More serious stuff, I am a bit puzzled by this snipplet from the build log (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1133537&name=build.log ): checking for X... libraries , headers checking X11/xpm.h usability... no checking X11/xpm.h presence... no checking for X11/xpm.h... no checking for XpmReadFileToPixmap in -lXpm... no checking for gtk-config... no checking gtk/gtk.h usability... no checking gtk/gtk.h presence... no checking for gtk/gtk.h... no checking for gtk_init in -lgtk... no It seems that BR gtk2-devel is not sufficient ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201657.n1KGvJdW013042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #2 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-20 11:57:18 EDT --- Hi Fabio, Does mock work for you? This is in just-updated rawhide: # mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 /t/fence-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.14 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(/t/fence-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.14 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.14 INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: creating cache State Changed: setup ERROR: Exception(/t/fence-agents-3.0.0-1.alpha4.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 5 minutes 45 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'glibc-devel' 'nss-devel' 'openaislib-devel >= 0.91-6' 'python' 'libxml2-devel' 'corosynclib-devel >= 0.92-7' 'libvirt-devel' 'nspr-devel' 'clusterlib-devel >= 3.0.0' 'xen-libs' 'perl' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 301, in user_main errcode = main(args) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 155, in main base.getOptionsConfig(args) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 188, in getOptionsConfig self.conf File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 632, in conf = property(fget=lambda self: self._getConfig(), File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 227, in _getConfig self._conf = config.readMainConfig(startupconf) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/config.py", line 772, in readMainConfig yumvars['releasever'] = _getsysver(startupconf.installroot, startupconf.distroverpkg) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/config.py", line 848, in _getsysver hdr = idx.next() StopIteration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 16:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201659.n1KGxNuv020134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-20 11:59:21 EDT --- Yes, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips should really be revised, but I can't find the time and no one else seems to bother. Anyway your 4.28-6 seems fine. Thank you for taking the time to fix the problems ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#What_if_the_new_naming_guidelines_require_me_to_rename_my_source_package.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465858] Package Review: afpfs-ng - Apple Filing Protocol client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201714.n1KHERsj024279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465858 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-20 12:14:26 EDT --- While using this myself for some time I've found experience with this tool quite painful -- feels very "Alpha" and even experienced a couple of server-triggered crashes, which may be exploitable. Unless I'm only person using this I'm willing to work on this and improve it, otherwise I won't let it enter Fedora and will close this in some time. So please review this only if you're interested in using it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201740.n1KHexDS023911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-20 12:40:58 EDT --- Looks like MooseX::MultiInitArg is a missing dep of Fedora::Bugzilla... I'm really beginning to think the rpm/Perl autoprov/req scripts need an overhaul. I'll get Fedora::Bugzilla rebuilt (after I deal with an expired cert) and post here when it's in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 17:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486620] New: Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486620 Summary: Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/python-createrepo.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/python-createrepo-0.9.6-1.el5.src.rpm Description: A python module that will generate a common metadata repository from a directory of rpm packages. This is intended for EPEL only. RHEL5's createrepo doesnt have the python module, koji 1.3.0 requires the python module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 18:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201809.n1KI9J9a005172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen 2009-02-20 13:09:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is only an informal review with some things I noticed. Furthermore it's my > first review of a non-font package - so expect that I understand some things > wrong. > > * Why do you use ExclusiveArch instead of "ExcludeArch: ppc64"? Standard Mono packaging thing, see the comment > * %description devel: "contains development and header files...". Does Mono > have header files. Maybe something like "The %{name}-devel package contains > development files for %{name}." would be more suitable? It's basically a cut and paste thing, I can change it > * Why don't you register the library with gacutil as written in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#Packaging_Tips ? Is this > obsolete? The guidelines were written by a guy who no longer to my knowledge does Mono work, the current Mono SIG has not examined in depth. It is high on my list of things to understand properly. > * Maybe include the README file as %doc because it includes some hints on how > to use the library and there isn't any other documentation yet. true > That's all for now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 18:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201824.n1KIOOZG002100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 18:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201849.n1KIntxt008567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-20 13:49:54 EDT --- For 2.73-4: * Description ------------------------------------------------------------ Free for commercial use, including Playstation 3, open source under the ZLib License. ------------------------------------------------------------ - I think this part can be deleted (actually all packages in Fedora must generally be free, and the correct license information can be received from License tag) * Directory ownership issue - Still some directories are not correctly owned (%{_includedir}/BulletCollision/, %{_includedir}/BulletDynamics/) ! Note Writing %files list verbosely like this way is usually error-prone. Instead I recommend to use the format like: ------------------------------------------------------------ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ... .... %{_includedir}/*.h %{_includedir}/BulletCollision/ %{_includedir}/LinearMath/ ...... ------------------------------------------------------------ Here the %files entry ------------------------------------------------------------ %files foo/ ------------------------------------------------------------ (where foo/ is a directory) contains the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/, so writing %files list in this way is much safer. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory * Missing ldconfig symlinks (In reply to comment #23) > Does that mean I should dig around CMake and make sure files like > libBullet*.so.2 are also generated ? - The following is sufficient. ------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir} for f in lib*.so.*.* do ln -sf $f ${f%\.*} done popd ------------------------------------------------------------- * Misc rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------------- bullet.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/bullet-2.73/ChangeLog bullet.src: W: strange-permission generate-tarball.sh 0775 ------------------------------------------------------------- - Please change the encoding of "ChangeLog" file to UTF-8. - All files in srpm must have 0644 permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 18:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201855.n1KItmkK010334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-20 13:55:47 EDT --- Looks like a bug in mock at this point. I manually checked all BuildRequires and are all available on the mirrors. Dropping all of the BuildRequires still fails with the same traceback (mock still attempts to install ccache but at this point it's not fence-agents triggering it). I understand building in mock is an absolutely required step for accepting the pacakge, so let's just wait next Monday and see if it gets fixed. It will also give me a chance to perform an alpha5 release to address the issues you already reported to me. Jim, thanks again for all your work. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 18:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201857.n1KIvweP017574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 --- Comment #12 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 13:57:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Yes, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips should really be > revised, but I can't find the time and no one else seems to bother. FWIW, I have just added a short paragraph about the template files in /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/. > Anyway your 4.28-6 seems fine. Thank you for taking the time to fix the > problems > > ??? APPROVED ??? Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201900.n1KJ091i011569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 14:00:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: terminus-fonts Short Description: Clean fixed width font Owners: ndim Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486620] Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201905.n1KJ5Cxs013162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486620 Mike Bonnet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikeb at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Mike Bonnet 2009-02-20 14:05:11 EDT --- $ rpmlint python-createrepo-0.9.6-1.el5.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-createrepo.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-createrepo-0.9.6-1.el5.noarch.rpm python-createrepo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/createrepo/merge.py 0644 python-createrepo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/createrepo/deltarpms.py 0644 python-createrepo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/createrepo/yumbased.py 0644 python-createrepo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/createrepo/readMetadata.py 0644 python-createrepo.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/createrepo/utils.py 0644 python-createrepo.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. Those rpmlint errors look bogus, no reason those files should be executable. And the dependency is on a package named libxml2-python. Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486620] Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201909.n1KJ9J19020790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486620 Mike Bonnet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201910.n1KJAwIJ021411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |rhnpush -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486620] Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201908.n1KJ8dDr020689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486620 Mike Bonnet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mikeb at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201922.n1KJMeSM018346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #4 from Jess Portnoy 2009-02-20 14:22:39 EDT --- Hello Christian, I've omitted the archive file from the package. Also, all documentation except the mandatory AUTHORS, COPYING, ChangeLog and README files now installs as part of the devel package. New src.rpm is available from: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-10-3.src.rpm Spec file URL is still: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec Thanks again, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486620] Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201927.n1KJRBi3025854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486620 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-02-20 14:27:10 EDT --- Package Name: python-createrepo Short Description: Python module to create common metadata repositories Owners: ausil skvidal Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486620] Review Request: python-createrepo - Python module to create common metadata repositorys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201927.n1KJRXA5025946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486620 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-02-20 14:27:32 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201936.n1KJajZd022310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 14:36:44 EDT --- Thanks. Will fix before import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gigolo Short Description: GIO/GVFS management application Owners: kevin Branches: devel F-10 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201941.n1KJfgqD023727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 14:41:41 EDT --- Can the reviewer here please set the fedora-review flag to + if they approve this package? (Also, reviewer should assign this review to themselves and moved it to ASSIGNED). reset fedora-cvs once thats done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:44:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201944.n1KJitlO024382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 14:44:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:47:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201947.n1KJlFQY025168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-20 14:47:14 EDT --- Hi Kevin, not sure this is a fall out from the new bugzilla packages but I got this email: Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ together with Comment 2. But even reloading the bugzilla page, the Flags (for me) were still set as fedora-review? is this normal? Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 19:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902201956.n1KJuIGE000894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-20 14:56:17 EDT --- Jim, sorry I need to bother you with this again but it appears that for some reason, when I added fedora-cvs+, your fedora-review+ has been changed back to -. I spoke to Kevin on IRC and for accounting reasons admins would prefer you to set the flag back to review+, otherwise it's all cleared up. Thanks Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202013.n1KKDcA9005786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:13:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202016.n1KKGoUe006847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:16:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486229] Review Request: indi-apogee - The INDI driver for Apogee Alta (U & E) line of CCDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202013.n1KKDkDV005826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486229 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:13:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202021.n1KKL37u008177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:21:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202019.n1KKJCAh001544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:19:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:25:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202025.n1KKPSRJ009948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:25:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202023.n1KKNV0k002882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:23:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202022.n1KKM5UP002597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:22:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202024.n1KKOYAw003108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:24:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202024.n1KKOqdX003184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |meyering at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-20 15:24:51 EDT --- Fabio, no problem. I've just set the fedora-review flag to +, again, and listed myself in "assigned to". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202028.n1KKSpfj010987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |fence-agentes - Fence |fence-agents - Fence Agents |Agents for Red Hat Cluster |for Red Hat Cluster --- Comment #5 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-20 15:28:50 EDT --- corrected typo s/agentes/agents/ in title -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202029.n1KKToxh004878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:29:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481064] Review Request: squeak-image - the standard image file for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202030.n1KKUqrW005470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481064 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:30:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agentes - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202027.n1KKR3Yj004161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |meyering at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-20 15:27:02 EDT --- Fabio, Fine with me. Listed myself as ASSIGNED-TO. Have a good weekend, Jim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481066] Review Request: etoys - the Etoys image for the Squeak VM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202031.n1KKVuPO011952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481066 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:31:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202033.n1KKXkTt012317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:33:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:35:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202035.n1KKZpd1013064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:35:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202034.n1KKYrb8012558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:34:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486648] New: Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486648 Summary: Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmccann at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/simple-kiosk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/simple-kiosk-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tools for setting up a session in kiosk mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486648] Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202035.n1KKZMeR006971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486648 William Jon McCann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202039.n1KKdxWC014166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:39:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486292] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202039.n1KKdAC3013961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:39:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202038.n1KKcGAu007794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 15:38:13 EDT --- Specified owner ID joseluisblancoc does not have a Fedora Account Can you check and confirm thats your Fedora Account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 20:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202052.n1KKq21N011774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-20 15:52:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: resource-agents Short Description: Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster Owners: fabbione Branches: devel InitialCC: fabbione -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 21:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202102.n1KL2C7x020676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 David Cantrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 21:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:04:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] New: Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Summary: Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: capel at stone-it.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml.spec SRPM URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml-0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Blahtex is a program written in C++, which converts an equation given in a syntax close to TeX into MathML. It is designed by David Harvey and is aimed at supporting equations in MediaWiki. Blahtexml is a simple extension of blahtex. In addition to the functionality of blahtex, blahtexml has XML processing in mind and is able to process a whole XMLdocument into another XML document. Instead of converting only one formula at a time, blahtexml can convert all the formulas of the given XML file into MathML. This is my first package, and I'm now looking for a sponsor. Thanks for any comments you may have. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 21:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202106.n1KL6u8S021625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 21:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486248] Review Request: terminus-fonts - Clean fixed width font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202108.n1KL83on015929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486248 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-02-20 16:08:01 EDT --- terminus-fonts has been successfully built in rawhide, so I am closing this as NEXTRELEASE. Thanks for the help everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 21:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202130.n1KLUSJQ021263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #31 from Ant Bryan 2009-02-20 16:30:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > The package doesn't build in Rawhide: > > Processing files: gget-epiphany-extension-0.0.4-7.fc11 > error: > File not found by glob: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gget-0.0.4-7.fc11.i386/usr/lib/epiphany/*/extensions/gget* > > The epiphany extension does not get build because configure only checks for > epiphany <= 2.24, but rawhide already has 2.25. So you need to patch > configure/configure.ac, I will attach a patch. # Detects Epiphany 2.26/2.25 for rawhide # http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572602 Patch0: gget-0.0.4-epiphany.patch > Issues that needed to be fixed according to comment # 23: > OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual > license. > OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. > OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a > %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with > desktop-file-install in the %install section. > OK - MUST: The packages do not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. > OK - %changelog is complete now > OK - ChangeLog from source is included in %doc > OK - The desktop file contains a mimetype and update-mime-database is run > properly. > OK - Includes "Requires: dbus" now. > OK - Timestamp of Source0 is matching. > > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gget-* > gget.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas > gget.i386: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gget/metalink.py 0644 > gget.i386: E: no-binary > gget.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 68, tab: line 6) > gget-epiphany-extension.i386: W: no-documentation > gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/epiphany/2.25/extensions/gget-epiphany.py 0644 > gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. > > Two of these need fixing: > The non-executable-script error was my fault, please enable the chmod again. > The mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs warning is only cosmetic, but I suggest you > ether use spaces or tabs. Personally I prefer spaces, because tabs sometimes > look weird in (cvs) diffs. Re-added chmod, using spaces not tabs: rpmlint gget-0.0.4-8.fc10.i386.rpm gget-epiphany-extension-0.0.4-8.fc10.i386.rpm gget.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gget.schemas gget.i386: E: no-binary gget-epiphany-extension.i386: W: no-documentation gget-epiphany-extension.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > Final Notes: > > The BR could be reworked to be more precise and more legible: > BuildRequires: pygtk2-devel >= 2.10.0 > BuildRequires: pygobject2-devel >= 2.12.0 > BuildRequires: gnome-python2-devel >= 2.16.0 > BuildRequires: gnome-python2-extras >= 2.14.2 > BuildRequires: dbus-python-devel >= 0.82 > BuildRequires: notify-python >= 0.1.1 > BuildRequires: intltool > This is what configure really checks for. The versions are not really needed > for Fedora because all supported releases are up to date, but they might be > helpful for people who want to rebuild the package for EPEL or other older > releases. Ok. > Please add "--add-category=FileTransfer" to desktop-file-install to allow > nested menus (we are working on a set of submenu-packages for user who have a > lot of stuff installed) Done. Should I ask upstream to add this as well? > The outstanding issues are only minor. Please do one more build to fix them and > to apply the patch and I will approve the package. Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1343199 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/gget/gget-0.0.4-8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 21:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202145.n1KLjZCa030722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|UPSTREAM | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202215.n1KMFvp5004849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-20 17:15:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bpg-fonts Short Description: Georgian Unicode fonts Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: fonts-sig ...and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486648] Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202227.n1KMRJTG007797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486648 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 17:27:18 EDT --- uhm... No URL available as upstream ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486672] New: Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 Summary: Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/python-hashlib.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/python-hashlib-20081119-3.el5.src.rpm Description: This is a stand alone packaging of the hashlib library introduced in Python 2.5 so that it can be used on older versions of Python. This is for EL-5 only, its needed to make sure mergerepos work in koji with repos using sha256 data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486672] Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202235.n1KMZn3F004169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 17:35:48 EDT --- expect full review in a couple of minutes. I've used the same package in F7 so I expect no surprises -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202234.n1KMY95C003654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #32 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-20 17:34:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > > Re-added chmod, using spaces not tabs: The only chmod that is actually needed is chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/metalink.py You can remove the other one after import. > > Please add "--add-category=FileTransfer" to desktop-file-install to allow > > nested menus (we are working on a set of submenu-packages for user who have a > > lot of stuff installed) > > Done. Should I ask upstream to add this as well? Yes please. It's not really important, but if it's fixed upstream you have less work. 8063441d8f95cee10efc9ee72bb429ae gget-0.0.4-8.fc10.src.rpm fixes all outstanding issues, so this package is ================================================================= APROVED by cwickert ================================================================= Ant, please get your self a FAS account, so I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202249.n1KMn3Lh006218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #33 from Ant Bryan 2009-02-20 17:49:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #31) > > > > Re-added chmod, using spaces not tabs: > > The only chmod that is actually needed is > chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/metalink.py > > You can remove the other one after import. Ok. > > > Please add "--add-category=FileTransfer" to desktop-file-install to allow > > > nested menus (we are working on a set of submenu-packages for user who have a > > > lot of stuff installed) > > > > Done. Should I ask upstream to add this as well? > > Yes please. It's not really important, but if it's fixed upstream you have less > work. I like less work :) > 8063441d8f95cee10efc9ee72bb429ae gget-0.0.4-8.fc10.src.rpm > fixes all outstanding issues, so this package is > > ================================================================= > APROVED by cwickert > ================================================================= > > Ant, please get your self a FAS account, so I can sponsor you. YAY! My FAS account is "ant" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 22:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202254.n1KMskDo012464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #43 from Michal Nowak 2009-02-20 17:54:43 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.2-0.1.rc3.fc10.src.rpm -- * Fri Feb 20 2009 Michal Nowak 3.2-0.1.rc3 - 3.2-rc3 - more docs files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202300.n1KN0saK008549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #34 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-20 18:00:53 EDT --- Ok, I sponsored you. Time for the cvs admin procedure: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486672] Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202304.n1KN4Hfg014440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 18:04:16 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: Centos5/x86_64, Fedora 7/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source RPM: W: invalid-license PSF license binary RPM: W: invalid-license PSF license ==> See note 1 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot) (not exactly one of the recommended values but not too far either :) ) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: Python License ==> See also note 1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9131c25457639b8e0e1612ef30991adb73abf2b1 hashlib-20081119.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. ==> see note 2 [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: centos5/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [!] %check is present and the test passes. => bundled tests are not run ===NOTES=== Couple of small issues: 1. The license tag is not correct: [wolfy at wolfy result]$ rpmlint *rpm python-hashlib.src: W: invalid-license PSF license python-hashlib.x86_64: W: invalid-license PSF license python-hashlib-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license PSF license 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I am afraid this license is not in the list from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List . If I am not mistaken the approved tag is "Python" or "Python license" 2. warning: source file `README.txt' specified more than once So - please be as kind as to change the license tag to the accepted value - as there is exactly one .txt file, please drop either README.txt or *.txt from %doc I'll trust you to fix those aspects before commit. APPROVED and thanks (Dennis & Seth) for supporting EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202316.n1KNG5TM017141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-20 18:16:04 EDT --- 1143444 build (dist-f11, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/xfce4-power-manager/devel:xfce4-power-manager-0_6_2-1_fc11) completed successfully Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202316.n1KNGYji011858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #33 from Jose Luis 2009-02-20 18:16:33 EDT --- Kevin, you're right. My account there is: jlblanco Sorry for the inconveniences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486672] Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202323.n1KNNJAM018624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-02-20 18:23:18 EDT --- Package Name: python-hashlib Short Description: Secure hash and message digest algorithm library Owners: ausil skvidal Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: CVS Done, Thanks for the quick review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486672] Review Request: python-hashlib - Secure hash and message digest algorithm library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202333.n1KNXDDu020555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486672 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 18:33:12 EDT --- Just wondering: what's the Prefix: %{_prefix} needed for ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 20 23:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902202357.n1KNv1fl019063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-20 18:57:00 EDT --- builds fine in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1143654 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486680] New: Review Request: chisholm-banana-peels-fonts - A Decorative Serif Font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chisholm-banana-peels-fonts - A Decorative Serif Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486680 Summary: Review Request: chisholm-banana-peels-fonts - A Decorative Serif Font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josephsmidt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/chisholm-banana-peels-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/chisholm-banana-peels-fonts-20090220-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Banana Peels is a decorative serif font where letters look like they are made from banana peels. rpmlint chisholm-banana-peels-fonts-20090220-1.fc10.noarch.rpm chisholm-banana-peels-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation chisholm-banana-peels-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/fonts/conf.d/61-chisholm-banana-peels.conf /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/61-chisholm-banana-peels.conf chisholm-banana-peels-fonts.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20090125-1 ['20090220-1.fc10', '20090220-1'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210040.n1L0e9C7027359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 --- Comment #1 from Deji Akingunola 2009-02-20 19:40:08 EDT --- A new bugfix update has been released. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486686] Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210041.n1L0fRPL027668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486686] Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210040.n1L0es2k027573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486686] New: Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486686 Summary: Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thibault.north at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/FEL/tkgate.spec SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/FEL/tkgate-2.0-2.beta6.fc11.src.rpm Description: TkGate is a event driven digital circuit simulator based on Verilog . TkGate supports a wide range of primitive circuit elements as well as user-defined modules for hierarchical design. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:50:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] New: Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 Summary: Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeremy.hankinson at ingres.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubbing-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts-20090124-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Rubbing is a decorative sans-serif font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 00:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210057.n1L0vTVk003020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-20 19:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - Unversioned shared libraries should go into a -devel subpackage > > Ah, in theory yes. But I did talk with upstream about this and he > doesn't want to have a devel package yet, even though the architecture > of marlin is done so that external apps can benefit from it's internal > libraries. The reason is that the internal libraries are still a moving > target so he can't guarantee any API/ABI compatibility yet. When he can > do that, we can start shipping a -devel package I think. > > Does this make any sense ? Not really. This is a very bad idea. Upstream should be versioning any libraries that they want anyone to use. Even if the API/ABI changes aggressively, he should just bump the solib versioning aggressively. With unversioned shared libraries in the main package, any other package that uses those libraries will not know when the ABI changes have broken it. RPM will be unable to track these breaks. We put the .so files in -devel specifically to make it obvious that no normal package should depend on anything -devel. So, unfortunately, this is a blocker. They either go in -devel or they don't get packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 01:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210113.n1L1DPDg006060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #12 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-20 20:13:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > More a "pong" than a review, I';; be back a bit later: > > rpmlint of twin: > twin.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/setroot.sample > twin.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/LICENSING.INFO > twin.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/README.twsetroot Ah, forgot to rpmlint again, sorry, fixed. > More serious stuff, I am a bit puzzled by this snipplet from the build log > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1133537&name=build.log ): [...] > checking for gtk-config... > no [...] > It seems that BR gtk2-devel is not sufficient ? Yeah, gtk-config is in gtk+-devel, thanks for noticing that! New SPEC file: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin-0.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1143787 P.S. The BSD/BSD with advertising issue is just pending releasing new sources from upstream, should be soon (probably without bumping release number), I've modified the licensing info in spec file in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 01:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486648] Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210121.n1L1LQMS002679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486648 --- Comment #2 from Warren Togami 2009-02-20 20:21:25 EDT --- Jon, my main concern with this package is the name. This is really specific to firefox, yet the name does not reflect this. Could it please be called something with "browser" or something in the name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 01:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210133.n1L1XQPZ009602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-20 20:33:25 EDT --- Review coming.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 01:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210144.n1L1iOsI006304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #2 from Jay Hankinson 2009-02-20 20:44:23 EDT --- Correct SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-rubbing-fonts-20090125-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486489] Review Request: perl-Object-Event - Class that provides an event callback interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210210.n1L2AwJI016747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486489 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210208.n1L28djw011099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-20 21:08:38 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines NO - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches Embedded in font - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: faf9b021e799e6eddd5e6c0b3089a3f0 ruf.upstream.zip faf9b021e799e6eddd5e6c0b3089a3f0 ruf.zip N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1143839 OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. SEE ABOVE - No rpmlint output. $ rpmlint * chisholm-rubbing-fonts.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Issues: 1. Spec file name doesn't match the base package name - needs to be renamed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210229.n1L2TPEJ019715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #4 from Jay Hankinson 2009-02-20 21:29:24 EDT --- Corrected spec file name. New spec file and SRPM uploaded. Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubbing-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-rubbing-fonts-20090125-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210237.n1L2bHC4021371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #5 from Jay Hankinson 2009-02-20 21:37:16 EDT --- Real Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/chisholm-rubbing-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210240.n1L2e1fd021678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210239.n1L2dWAd016534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-20 21:39:31 EDT --- Looks good to me, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 02:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486493] Review Request: perl-Net-DBus-GLib - Perl extension for the DBus GLib bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210246.n1L2kpcc023135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486493 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 03:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210302.n1L3297c020924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #12 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-20 22:02:08 EDT --- Fixed SPEC: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement.spec Fixed SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.4.20090217svn.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint says that the Provides: should be versioned. Not sure if I should, and if so, what version it should be. %{version}-%{release} I'd guess, if any. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 03:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486482] Review Request: perl-Gnome2 - Perl interface to the 2.x series of the GNOME libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210314.n1L3Esft023530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486482 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 03:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486249] Review Request: perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak - Tie::RefHash subclass with weakened references in the keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210341.n1L3f6Vb029379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486249 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 03:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210357.n1L3vfkk032333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 22:57:40 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 04:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210452.n1L4qh3I009254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-20 23:52:42 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 80659565406f838585a867443aad4102 thunar-shares-plugin-0.2.0.tar.gz 80659565406f838585a867443aad4102 thunar-shares-plugin-0.2.0.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: None. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 05:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210531.n1L5VAMN020180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-21 00:31:09 EDT --- Sorry, I got busy for a couple days. It looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 05:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210531.n1L5VspX020270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 05:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210532.n1L5WRD0016404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |josephsmidt at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 07:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210704.n1L749hp031840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #51 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-21 02:04:04 EDT --- Any update here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 08:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] New: Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Summary: Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fedora-setup-keyboard.spec SRPM URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fedora-setup-keyboard-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: fedora-setup-keyboard gets invoked by hal to apply the keyboard layout defined in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard. rpmlint output: fedora-setup-keyboard.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (There are no docs) koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144341 NOTE: The files in this packages conflict with the ones shipped in xorg-x11-server-Xorg. This is intentional, it is going to replace them (X will than depend on this package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 08:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210802.n1L82tlp012755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 08:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210827.n1L8RkMH016223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-21 03:27:43 EDT --- Now missing "BuildRequires: libicu-devel" instead of "libicu". > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144346 Failed to build because of missing build requirements: BuildRequires: tex(latex) BuildRequires: tex(dvips) # redundant through latex # BuildRequires: tex(tex) After adding those, it fails on i386 (dist-f11-gcc44) with a strange CMake Error occuring multiple times: CMake Error at cmake_modules/AddSrcSubfolder.cmake:42 (FILE): file RelativePath must be passed a full path to the file: ??E ??E ??E References: Message-ID: <200902210829.n1L8TI76012304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #2 from Jan Blazek 2009-02-21 03:29:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is an un-official pre-review. > > - May I suggest append "%{dist}" at the end of release string. Thank you. It's repaired now. New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-3.9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 08:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246348] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210846.n1L8kmFX019211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246348 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |parrot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 09:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210905.n1L95dv4023871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 --- Comment #3 from David Nielsen 2009-02-21 04:05:38 EDT --- Where are you finding this README file? I cannot seem to find it in my mono.nat tarball. Aside that I believe make install takes care of the gacutils thing. This makes the text update the only update I can make currently and I don't feel that is worth a version bump, I will roll it in with any coming review fixes or if no changes are needed for review I will change it by check in time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 09:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902210921.n1L9Ls5B021903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-21 04:21:53 EDT --- > --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-20 19:57:28 EDT --- [...] > So, unfortunately, this is a blocker. They either go in -devel or they don't > get packaged. My point was to *not* package them. I was not pushing for having the *.so in the library. The reasons I was giving were to explain why I didn't want to ship a -devel package. Not to ship *.so in the package. And as far as can tell from the spec file I pointed to at http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/marlin/marlin-3.spec, there are no unversioned library in the package. If I am missing something, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 10:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211009.n1LA9xvC030610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-21 05:09:58 EDT --- Fedora 10 x86_64: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib64/libzorba_simplestore.* These are installed into /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 (%_libdir). Same applies to other files. > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so.0.9.5 > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so > -- Up-to-date: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so.0.9.5 > -- Up-to-date: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/zorba_api.py > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_zorba_api.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 10:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211042.n1LAgKBg004582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #13 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-21 05:42:18 EDT --- libXpm-devel was also missing as BR and the date of the last changelog entry was wrong (Fridat was Feb 20, not 21) new koji scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144478. I'll do the review later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 11:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211125.n1LBPVIb018485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 Bug 459989 depends on bug 473814, which changed state. Bug 473814 Summary: rpm's pkgconfig auto provides is broken (fix included) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473814 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 12:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485853] Review Request: calendar - Reminder utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211225.n1LCP6Oj029025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.openbsd.org:80/c | |gi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/c | |alendar/ CC| |tuju at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 12:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211222.n1LCM2GY028471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-21 07:22:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: thunar-shares-plugin Short Description: Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] New: Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Summary: Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/webkit-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: .NET bindings for WebKit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211310.n1LDAr0t032710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 --- Comment #2 from Niall Sheridan 2009-02-21 08:10:52 EDT --- Hi Thanks for taking the time to review this. I've fixed Source0 in the specfile to Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/M/MA/MACKERS/o2sms-%{version}.tar.gz I'll update to the latest version. I have one question about "Package doesn't own any directories other packages own." - can you elaborate on this failure? I assume it refers to owning %{vendor_perl}/WWW/ - should I change this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486721] New: Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 Summary: Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/beagle-xesam.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/beagle-xesam-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xesam adaptor for Beagle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211334.n1LDYXRX009457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Comment #10 from David Nielsen 2009-02-21 08:34:32 EDT --- With MD2 beta 1 out and Fedora now containing a new succesful build of MD are you still interested in this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211336.n1LDaSjq010064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 --- Comment #4 from David Nielsen 2009-02-21 08:36:27 EDT --- While I have dropped the ball on this, I see you still have not completed the suggested changes. Are you still interested in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443576] Review Request: monodevelop-boo - boo plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211334.n1LDYals004406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443576 --- Comment #7 from David Nielsen 2009-02-21 08:34:35 EDT --- With MD2 beta 1 out and Fedora now containing a new succesful build of MD are you still interested in this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 13:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443578] Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211334.n1LDYVpY004372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578 --- Comment #4 from David Nielsen 2009-02-21 08:34:29 EDT --- With MD2 beta 1 out and Fedora now containing a new succesful build of MD are you still interested in this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 14:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211413.n1LEDv7p017738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #10 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-21 09:13:56 EDT --- Okay, sorry for the misunderstanding about the unversioned libraries situation. I will continue the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 15:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211555.n1LFtFCA032469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-21 10:55:14 EDT --- - add docs - rpmlint clean - add %%check section spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/grin/grin.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/grin/grin-1.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm koji: n/a (koji server down this weekend) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 17:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211733.n1LHXlt1023971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #52 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-21 12:33:42 EDT --- It's looking like Samba4 is again not going to make the cut. I'm waiting on Simo Sorce to deliver a interim subset package containing the Samba4 libraries needed for OpenChange. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 18:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211814.n1LIEZx0031620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 Jeff Layton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |jlayton at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jeff Layton 2009-02-21 13:14:32 EDT --- Looks like this hasn't been updated in a long time and since nfs-utils is part of fedora and has been for a long time. I'll go ahead and close this. Please reopen if anything more needs to be done with it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 18:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211819.n1LIJQnp032531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #53 from Simo Sorce 2009-02-21 13:19:23 EDT --- Release of separate libraries is also slipping :-( Matt I think it would be safe for now to just grab your own copy of samba4 frozen in a status the openchange people is ok with, and just build the few libraries you need yourself and store them into a private path as part of the openchange package. While not ideal, I think this will make it easier to release openchange in F11, once there, we will try to gradually split out dependencies as pieces stabilize upstream and become available as official releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 18:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211822.n1LIMwTr027753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #6 from Pascal 2009-02-21 13:22:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > * You can use the macro %{name} instead of Fox in a number of places in the The name of the package is not the name of the archive. I used the same name as debian used for their deb: http://packages.debian.org/fr/sid/objcryst-fox > > * Please add an extra \n between two change in the changelog (some tool used Done in the spec but new srpm/rpm not updated > > It might be nice also to give to the reviewer an input file and an output file > so that the software could actually be tested :) There are example files in /usr/share/doc/objcryst-fox... A tutorial is here: http://vincefn.net/Fox/Tutorials > > You might also be interested to join the SciTech SIG: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SciTech_SIG > Yes, good idea, I'll see when this get pushed in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 18:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211857.n1LIvesG008033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-21 13:57:39 EDT --- At first glance the packaging looks good. However, when I install and run marlin there is no icon in the menu, yet there is one called for in the .desktop file. (As there should be). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 19:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485897] Review Request: perl-Variable-Magic - Associate user-defined magic to variables from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211916.n1LJGkbT012519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485897 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-Variable-Magic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 19:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211914.n1LJEomL011844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-21 14:14:44 EDT --- This package looks quite a bit better now. Regarding the stuff in the demo directory, I think any of those possibilities would work, although a subpackage is probably overkill. Regarding the patches, it would be nice to document them somehow (at least adding comments to the spec referring to the above bugzilla tickets) but I'm not really sure it's within the scope of this review to insist that those remaining three patches be reconciled with upstream. It would certainly be a good idea to work with upstream to somehow make them unnecessary, and of course Fedora is steadfastly against letting more of this kind of thing creep in (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream) but I recognize that there is some historical cruft that may not be simple to get rid of. So really I'd say that if those patches were documented in the spec with links to the above bugzilla tickets, and something is done with the demo directory then I would consider the package OK. I would still urge further work with upstream and perhaps the previous maintainers of this package to understand the patches and either get them sent upstream or dropped from the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 19:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226198] Merge Review: nfs-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211940.n1LJeSKM011243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226198 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-21 14:40:27 EDT --- Please do not close merge review tickets unless you're doing the reviews. This package is still under review and has yet to be approved. It doesn't matter that it has been in Fedora for a long time; all of the packages which came in from core need to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 19:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225612] Merge Review: beagle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211950.n1LJo7Qv012967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225612 --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-21 14:50:05 EDT --- Thanks for the initial review, I have missed them because I was not CCed on this bug. I will address the issues noted next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 19:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902211958.n1LJwtgM014544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #54 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-21 14:58:53 EDT --- Too much indecision here... Matt, lets just go with the initial packaging approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225998] Merge Review: libdmx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212006.n1LK6C4C021500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225998 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 15:06:10 EDT --- Most of this is fixed in 1.0.2-7. Haven't touched %description yet, not really sure what's a good template. Most of the X libs have a similar description, so it'd be nice to keep them consistent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226027] Merge Review: libICE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212011.n1LKBObZ017152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226027 --- Comment #3 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 15:11:23 EDT --- Fixed in 1.0.4-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226045] Merge Review: libSM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212015.n1LKFC5M023052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226045 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 15:15:11 EDT --- Fixed in 1.1.0-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212026.n1LKQR6c019646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-21 15:26:25 EDT --- +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ Just remember to inform upstream about the licensing mix-up to avoid any future misunderstanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486757] New: Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 Summary: Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwheeler at dwheeler.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/divine-mc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/divine-mc-1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: DiVinE Multi-Core (MC) is a parallel shared-memory enumerative model-checking tool for verification of concurrent systems. The tool can employ the full power of modern 64-bit multi-core architectures. It can be used to prove correctness of verification models as well as to detect early design errors. Any model-checking tool, such as DiViNe MC, accepts system requirements or design (called models) and a property (called specification) that the final system is expected to satisfy. The tool then outputs yes if the given model satisfies given specifications, and generates a counterexample otherwise. The counterexample details why the model doesn't satisfy the specification. DiViNe MC is based on automata-theoretic approach to linear temporal logics (LTL) model checking. The input language allows for specification of processes in terms of extended finite automata and the verified system is then obtained as an asynchronous parallel composition of these processes. In the current DiVinE Multi-Core release, input is provided in DVE format -- an industry-strength specification language, as used in original DiVinE, with plenty of diverse example models, ranging from simple toys to complex real-world models. An extensive model database is available at BEEM database. Moreover, DiVinE can read models specified in ProMeLa (as used in the SPIN tool), in addition to its native DVE format. However, the capabilities of the tool on ProMeLa models is currently limited by inability to produce counterexamples: you can only obtain a yes/no answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212042.n1LKgsxA022587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-21 15:42:53 EDT --- Sorry for the delayed response. Till now libchamplain and libchamplain-gtk had two separate source trees, which has recently been merged into one. This happened earlier than I had predicted. However it will take some time for the first release from this merged tree. Therefore I am not sure whether we should go ahead with this review, because libchamplain-gtk will be very short-lived as a separate source package. Once the 0.4.x (or 0.3.x) releases come out from the unified tree, libchamplain-gtk will become a sub-package of libchamplain. What do you think? (In reply to comment #1) > Couple of things : > > - you should not put "%{version}" macro in the patch0 source filename, since > this will force you to rename it everytime you update the package. Although not > officially in the guidelines, most people hardcode the version that the patch > was derived from, and keep that version in the filename until the patch no > longer applies and has to be recreated... Yes, you are right. The reason I do it is to force myself to rebase the patches on every new upstream release to avoid any silly build failures due to the new RPM's zero fuzz tolerance, or have any ancient patches lying around. > - why the pkgconfig patch ? I can see the development headers indeed only need > libchamplain and gtk2 but this most likely will not stay true in the future. > Seems a bit over the top... In case they actually add any new dependencies then we will have to add it in the Spec (only on F10 since F11 auto-detects pkgconfig stuff) and modify/remove the patch accordingly. I have notified the upstream author and he seems to agree that the pkgconfig file might be faulty. It somehow does not feel right to knowingly distribute a faulty file. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226062] Merge Review: libX11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212053.n1LKrwg6029650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226062 --- Comment #3 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 15:53:57 EDT --- Mostly fixed in 1.2-2. The zero-lenth compose files are that way upstream as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226063] Merge Review: libXau In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212056.n1LKuYtZ030241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226063 --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 15:56:33 EDT --- Cleaned up most of the usual problems in 1.0.4-2. rpmlint comes back silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 20:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226068] Merge Review: libXdmcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212059.n1LKxYmu025170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226068 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 15:59:33 EDT --- Fixed in 1.0.2-7, along with the other usual suspects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212100.n1LL0iNI025800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #55 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-21 16:00:42 EDT --- Agreed. I'll continue addressing your review comments. I don't want to be supporting a quick and dirty hack in RHEL 6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226075] Merge Review: libXinerama In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212103.n1LL3E9C026290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226075 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 16:03:13 EDT --- Mostly fixed in 1.0.3-3, except for the %description bit Note that xorg-x11-proto-devel pulls in pkgconfig for free. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:12:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] New: Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 Summary: Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie Product: Fedora Version: 7 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/yofrankie-bge.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/yofrankie-bge-1-0.1.20081221svn.src.rpm Description: Yo Frankie! is an open source computer game by the Blender Institute. It is based on the universe and characters of the open source film Big Buck Bunny. In the game, players assume the role of Frank, the sugar glider who was the antagonist of the film Big Buck Bunny. The game has been made using free software, partly as a showcase of what can be achieved with free software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212130.n1LLUZmg004397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-21 16:30:34 EDT --- Note: There are two issues known to me: 1.) Version number is made up 2.) Licensing is not clear enough Don't let that discourage you from reviewing, both were communicated upstream and I'm currently waiting for a reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212128.n1LLSDjW003799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #12 from Jon Levell 2009-02-21 16:28:11 EDT --- Re: Comment #11 I've been giving some thought to my sponsorship request. I would like to be sponsored but I don't (at least initially) want to maintain many packages. On the other hand, this package isn't very good evidence that I'm competent. Would a number of informal package reviews be enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212155.n1LLtqci009722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-21 16:55:51 EDT --- Yes, good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486760] Review Request: mscore - Music Composition & Notation Software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212159.n1LLxMmM005228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486760 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |483376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212159.n1LLxN0u005261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226136] Merge Review: mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212159.n1LLxtTh005338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226136 --- Comment #3 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 16:59:54 EDT --- Fixed most of the obvious stuff in 7.3-3. There's still unversioned provides for a bunch of stuff, in principle so you can depend on libGL without caring whose libGL you get. I'm not sure it's worth keeping, but it's harmless enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 21:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:58:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486760] New: Review Request: mscore - Music Composition & Notation Software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mscore - Music Composition & Notation Software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486760 Summary: Review Request: mscore - Music Composition & Notation Software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/mscore.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/mscore-0.9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MuseScore is a free cross platform WYSIWYG music notation program. Some highlights: * WYSIWYG, notes are entered on a "virtual note sheet" * Unlimited number of staves * Up to four voices per staff * Easy and fast note entry with mouse, keyboard or MIDI * Integrated sequencer and FluidSynth software synthesizer * Import and export of MusicXML and Standard MIDI Files (SMF) * Available in 12 languages Rpmlint: mscore-mscore-fonts.x86_64: W: no-documentation mscore-mscore-fonts.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exceptions There's not much I can do for the first one. The second one is false alarm, because "GPL+ with exceptions" is listed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses This is a very nice piece of software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 22:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226349] Merge Review: pyxf86config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212202.n1LM2Gg4011111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226349 --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 17:02:15 EDT --- Fixed an explicit Requires: glib2 in 0.3.37-3. Everything else looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 22:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226612] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212207.n1LM7Hij007065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226612 --- Comment #2 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 17:07:16 EDT --- Fixed smp_mflags in 2.1.12-9. nouveau is a separate package now, so I think this is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 22:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226644] Merge Review: xorg-x11-server-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212217.n1LMHWQb013660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226644 --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2009-02-21 17:17:31 EDT --- Fixed some minor stuff in 7.4-6. The unversioned provides are intentional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 22:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212217.n1LMHXig008748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|palango at gmx.de |gnomeuser at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Paul Lange 2009-02-21 17:17:32 EDT --- Don't know where I found this Readme file. Most probably it only exists in my brain or in mono-torrent. forget about it ;) Further (more formal) review: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. mono-nat.i386: W: no-documentation We can't change this, maybe we could ask upstream. mono-nat.i386: E: no-binary mono-nat.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Can be ignored. mono-nat-devel.i386: W: no-documentation We can't change this. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. License file not included. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Currently handled with "ExclusiveArch:". Maybe change this to "ExcludeArch:ppc64"? - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ############################################################ So the only thing I can find is the ExclusiveArch vs. ExcludeArch problem. I think booth works, maybe we should create a default for Mono Packages. The text update could be done later. I also assigned the bug to you. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 22:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225998] Merge Review: libdmx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212250.n1LMoElf019400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225998 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-21 17:50:12 EDT --- I went ahead and used Summary: X.Org X11 DMX runtime library %description The X.Org X11 DMX (Distributed Multihead X) runtime library. which seem to satisfy the usual goals for these tags (summary doesn't include package name, both are basically useful as an explanation and bizarre acronyms are expanded in the description. They also don't stray overly from what other X packages are using. I guess the descriptions aren't grammatically sentences, but adding "This package contains" to them seems to be beyond pointless. At this point I would approve this package were it my review, but that's Orcan's call. I'm only sticking my head in here because ajax asked me to take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 23:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212315.n1LNF2sC023988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-21 18:15:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wifi Short Description: Python binding for the wireless extensions Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 23:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212314.n1LNEED0023550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-21 18:14:13 EDT --- https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=15290&group_id=7134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 23:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212314.n1LNEskr023682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen 2009-02-21 18:14:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-nat Short Description: .NET library for automatic port forwarding Owners: dnielsen Branches: F-9, F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 23:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226612] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212315.n1LNFQjH024086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226612 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-21 18:15:25 EDT --- Indeed, this is fine; the nouveau driver is split out and the other bits are cleaned up. Thanks. I would urge some additional documentation of the patches since this package is starting to accumulate quite a few of them that don't seem to be going upstream. I see there there's some reasonable info in the changelog, but it would be good to have consistent links to Red Hat bugzilla or the upstream bug tracker. APPROVED and closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 23:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212325.n1LNPAp9021461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-21 18:25:08 EDT --- FYI, Steve indicated in an unrelated mailing list message that he is extremely busy at the moment and requested assistance getting his pacakges through the gcc44 thing, new fonts guidelines and mass rebuild. He also indicated that he doesn't want to orphan them because he intends to come back when able. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 21 23:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225998] Merge Review: libdmx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902212359.n1LNxtxO030241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225998 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-21 18:59:54 EDT --- I gave the excerpt from the manpage just for this purpose, and "Most X libs do it this way" is really not a good defense. Anyhow, Jason's correction made things a little better. Since there is no real guideline that a packager must obey about the quality of the summary/description, I can't put a blocker. ---------------------------------------------- This Merge Review (libdmx) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 00:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220028.n1M0SXJ7002980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gnomeuser at gmail.com |palango at gmx.de --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-21 19:28:32 EDT --- (Please keep the reviewer as assignee if the reviewer approved the review request) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 02:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226075] Merge Review: libXinerama In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220203.n1M239xH024421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226075 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-21 21:03:08 EDT --- Thanks, there are two more things. ? Could you at least define xinerama in the description as Jason did in libdmx? This is just a request from me. * You forgot this one: BR: libXau-devel is not needed. Afaict it is not used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 02:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220235.n1M2ZQXX029748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #13 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-21 21:35:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > rpmlint says that the Provides: should be versioned. Not sure if I should, and > if so, what version it should be. %{version}-%{release} I'd guess, if any. - Yes, it should and those Provides/Obsoletes statements must be placed also by the subpackages, see this draft for details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Archive:PackagingDrafts/ProvidesObsoletes - remove duplicate Requires: openvpn/vpnc, they're again pulled by the NetworkManager-openvpn/vpnc packages. - by providing a more appropriate description, I really didn't mean to expand the macro;) You should briefly describe the functions of the plasmoid, please try to do so for a few lines. - regardins licensing it's a big mess: GPLv2+: - libs/dbus/* LGPLv2: - in libs/ui: accesspoint.cpp,h apitemdelegate.cpp,h apitemmodel.cpp,h apitemview.cpp,h ifaceitemmodel.cpp,h scanwidget.cpp,h - in libs: marshalarguments.h types.h - in libs/storage/settings: wephash.cpp,h - in settings: ip4config.cpp,h - in settings/service: busconnection.cpp,h networksettings.cpp,h LGPLv2+: - in tests: testconfigxml.cpp,h testnewstorage.cpp,h GPLv2 or GPLv3 ("Qt Nokia"): tests/qdbusfornm.cpp MISSING LICENSE: libs/ui/vpnuiplugin.cpp all others under libs/ are LGPLv2+ all others are GPLv2+ So...this is a bit problem, please: - you can (but not must of course) try to persuade upstream to unify the licenses to GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ if it is possible. Currently it violates the GPL licenses according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix (You cannot copy LGPLv2 code within GPLv2+ project without converting to GPLv2) So you should at least try that. - you really should persuade them to: -- add the license info to libs/ui/vpnuiplugin.cpp if it not autogenerated -- include the license files for GPLv2 and LGPLv2, LICENSE.GPL and GPL_EXCEPTIONS.TXT. Suggest naming the GPLv2 license file as LICENSE.GPL to avoid duplicates. - please put the information I've gathered above into a LICENSING.INFO file and package it as a %doc As it is now, the License tag would be: (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 02:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220255.n1M2tt4S027872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2009-02-21 21:55:54 EDT --- As discussed on IRC, using the LGPLv2 code there is not a violation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 04:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 23:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220442.n1M4gO1m018021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #10 from Silas Sewell 2009-02-21 23:42:22 EDT --- I have some more time now, so I'm going to re-open this review and try to get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 06:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486804] New: Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 Summary: Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: monkeyiq at users.sf.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.libferris.com/ferrisloki.spec SRPM URL: http://www.libferris.com/ferrisloki-3.0.2-50021.src.rpm Description: A C++ system library for SmartPtr, Singletons, Functors, Factories and other nice things. This version contains some changes for Linux and other new items in Extensions.hh The end result is to get libferrisloki, libferrisstreams, stldb4, libferris itself and a few other higher level libferris packages into Fedora itself. This is the base package that all the others rely on. this is mer first package, and me are seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 07:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220717.n1M7HLsJ009612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-02-22 02:17:20 EDT --- First notes : - It requires PEAR >= 1.7.2 (according to upstream and to xml) : this will block this package for EPEL. - rpmlint warning : W: summary-not-capitalized quick two-way blowfish encryption - %file must be fixed %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{pear_xmldir}/%{pear_name}.xml %{pear_testdir}/%{pear_name} %{pear_phpdir}/Crypt - I would prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{pear_name}.xml (see recently approved PHP Guidelines, this is usefull to avoid conflict between package from various channel) - a comment about running the tests (which must be done as root after install) will be usefull : => pear run-tests -p Crypt_Blowfish -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 07:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486044] Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220729.n1M7TtNk005795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486044 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-02-22 02:29:54 EDT --- First Notes : - As optional deps are available it should be usefull to add it Requires: php-pear(XML_Parser) php-pear(XML_Util) - I prefer the use of %{name}.xml rather than %{pear_name}.xml (see recent change to PHP Guidelines, this will avoid conflict with package from other channel) - rpmlint is silent - A comment about running test-suite will be usefull # pear run-tests -p Config Running 16 tests ... FAIL [ 3/16] test for bug 3051[/usr/share/pear/test/Config/test/bug3051.phpt] ... FAIL [16/16] regression test for bug #10185[/usr/share/pear/test/Config/test/bug10185.phpt] wrote log to "/root/run-tests.log" TOTAL TIME: 00:01 14 PASSED TESTS 0 SKIPPED TESTS 2 FAILED TESTS: /usr/share/pear/test/Config/test/bug3051.phpt /usr/share/pear/test/Config/test/bug10185.phpt Have you encounter and investigate this issue ? (at least, reported upstream) - %file must be fixed, should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc %{pear_name}-%{version}/docdir/%{pear_name}/* %{pear_xmldir}/%{pear_name}.xml %{pear_testdir}/%{pear_name} %{pear_phpdir}/Config* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 07:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220744.n1M7iZGM007878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-02-22 02:44:34 EDT --- REVIEW * no source files * package meets naming and packaging guidelines (recently approved new PHP Guidelines). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license (of the packages provided by the channel). * license is open source-compatible (BSD). * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide). * package installs properly * rpmlint : php-channel-ezc.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(ezc) php-channel-ezc.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides php-channel(%{channel}) * final provides are sane: php-channel(components.ez.no) php-channel(ezc) php-channel-ezc = 1-1.fc8 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear channel..) * no documentation No version for the .xml file, but I think using 1 is OK. Providing php-channel(ezc) is not usefull and should be removed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 07:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220756.n1M7usF8015405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-02-22 02:56:53 EDT --- 2 directories not owned : /usr/share/pear/ezc /usr/share/pear/ezc/autoload As this is the first package for ezc channel (required by all others) it must own this dirs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 08:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220825.n1M8Pift014343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet 2009-02-22 03:25:42 EDT --- > Please, excuse me for long delay. Not a problem, I'm also actually very busy > No, duedlines say what CVS, not released versions must start from 0. Definitely, I can't agree. Version 0.9 have been published on 2006-06-06 So this is a post-release version Read : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages I prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{peclName}.xml (or %{peclName}2.xml) (see recent approved changes in PHP Guidelines, this is to avoid possible conflicts between pecl, pear and other channel extensions). I need to search if %verify(not md5 mtime size) is acceptable in the Guidelines... Is the spec encoding ok ? It seems there is UTF-8 (ru sumnary) and ISO (pl sumnary) which make my text editor crazy ? $ file php-pecl-runkit.spec php-pecl-runkit.spec: Non-ISO extended-ASCII text, with LF, NEL line terminators -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 09:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220904.n1M94iP3026338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 09:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220939.n1M9dofh029013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-22 04:39:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-channel-ezc Short Description: Adds eZ Components channel to PEAR Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 09:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902220946.n1M9k1vC003157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 --- Comment #3 from Denis Leroy 2009-02-22 04:46:00 EDT --- About the merged source trees, can you ask upstream when this will likely happen ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 10:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221001.n1MA1J9o006283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-22 05:01:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > About the merged source trees, can you ask upstream when this will likely > happen ? While the SCMs have been merged, it will take some time, my guess is 2-3 months, before there is any release from this merged tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 10:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221002.n1MA2652001300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-22 05:02:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > https://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=15290&group_id=7134 Nice. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 10:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221033.n1MAXsgt012508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-22 05:33:53 EDT --- SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Base.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 10:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221041.n1MAfoNV009028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 10:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221043.n1MAhklq009272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #12 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-22 05:43:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grnotify Short Description: Google Reader Notifier Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 16:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221627.n1MGR1Ss010029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #12 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-22 11:27:00 EDT --- Ooops, good catch. I didn't notice that. The problem comes from the tarball that installs the marlin icon in the wrong location. I filed a bug to upstream with a patch that fixes the problem: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572750. I added the patch to the package for now. Updated SPEC and SRPM are available at: http://dodji.fedorapeople.org/rpms/marlin/marlin-4.spec http://dodji.fedorapeople.org/rpms/marlin/marlin-0.13-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 17:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221701.n1MH1ol6010155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2009-02-22 12:01:49 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f11/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9477866298ef15bfee054d6dae1d59c9ead102f4 lxsession-edit-0.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f10/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 17:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484931] Renaming Review Request: hosts3d - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221723.n1MHNYiI018389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484931 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-22 12:23:33 EDT --- Included in F-10 devel and epel-5 i forgot to close the bug via bodhi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 17:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486865] New: Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486865 Summary: Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/arptools.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/arptools-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: ARP Tools is collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities. It currently contains ARP Discover (arpdiscover), an Ethernet scanner based on ARP protocol; ARP Flood (arpflood), an ARP request flooder; and ARP Poison (arppoison), for poisoning switches' MAC address tables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 17:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221747.n1MHlaXa017054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Christopher Stone 2009-02-22 12:47:35 EDT --- Shouldn't this be renamed to php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish to meet Fedora package naming guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 18:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221800.n1MI0IfT024423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-02-22 13:00:17 EDT --- Yes Christopher, you're right, I've miss this error (but it's only first notes ;) not the formal review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 18:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481009] Review request: pothana2000-fonts - Unicode compliant OpenType font for Telugu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221809.n1MI99Uu025737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481009 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 18:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] New: Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Summary: Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: palango at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/flickrnet/flickrnet.spec SRPM URL: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/flickrnet/flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A .NET library to interact with the Flickr API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 18:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221852.n1MIqGsl027137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 13:52:14 EDT --- I went ahead and ran through my checklist again: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. See below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPL+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: a138d1c2e74321e0e4e228a9fb301c9a iptables-1.4.2.tar.bz2 a138d1c2e74321e0e4e228a9fb301c9a iptables-1.4.2.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin See below - check for outstanding bugs on package (merge reviews/rename/re-reviews). Issues: 1. MINOR: Can you stick with one of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} ? 2. rpmlint says: iptables.src: W: strange-permission iptables.init 0755 iptables.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config 0600 iptables.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables iptables.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables iptables-ipv6.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables-config 0600 iptables-ipv6.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ip6tables iptables-ipv6.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ip6tables iptables-ipv6.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ip6tables All those can be ignored. 3. You might consider using one of the standard ways to remove rpath: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines (ie, sed instead of perl) 4. There are a few packaging related bugs that would be nice to fix up: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462207 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432617 The consistent use of macros is a MUST, so if you can fix that up I can approve this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 18:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221858.n1MIwQ4p001096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 13:58:25 EDT --- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221909.n1MJ9RDw003064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 --- Comment #11 from Silas Sewell 2009-02-22 14:09:26 EDT --- Updated package to version 0.1.0 and Python requirement to version 2.5 Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fabric/fabric.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/fabric-0.1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221913.n1MJD7Ol030731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablo.martin-gomez at laposte. | |net --- Comment #2 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-02-22 14:13:06 EDT --- Some comments about the spec : 1) Source0 should be an URL (the appropriate one : http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/releases/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0.tar.gz) 2) The PTS is a PHP program so the package doesn't need a particular architecture. Add "BuildArch: noarch" after "BuildRoot:" 3) Where do you find all this dependencies ? The PTS site just give me "php-gd" and "php-cli" ; for the rest, I suppose that the "External Dependencies" feature work with yum. 4) Add a %build section even if it's empty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221923.n1MJNhPJ032597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:23:43 EDT --- Can you fix your usage of --vendor here? >From the guidelines: "For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221936.n1MJaWT7007387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #14 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-22 14:36:31 EDT --- OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221935.n1MJZiY5007203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Jose Luis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221935.n1MJZKXF002023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 --- Comment #7 from Jose Luis 2009-02-22 14:35:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cutecom Short Description: A graphical serial terminal. Owners: jlblanco Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221936.n1MJaVqx002147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:36:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221939.n1MJdlc6007595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:39:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221940.n1MJeovD002864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:40:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221938.n1MJc9Da002261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:38:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221943.n1MJhrdU008293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) --- Comment #8 from David Nielsen 2009-02-22 14:43:51 EDT --- **** Access denied: dnielsen is not in ACL for rpms/mono-nat/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsqmQdfp What is going on here Kevin? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221943.n1MJhK1G003087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:43:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221950.n1MJoj7i009550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #15 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-22 14:50:45 EDT --- Correction made in http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/grnotify/grnotify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 19:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902221949.n1MJndC5009116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kevin at tummy.com) | --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 14:49:38 EDT --- The cron jobs that update the cvs acls run 2x/hour. Wait until after the top of the hour and all should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 20:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222013.n1MKD6ma013135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-22 15:13:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxsession-edit Short Description: Simple GUI to configure what?s automatically started in LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 20:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222013.n1MKDiPw008104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 20:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222038.n1MKcC0f012031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pablo.martin-gomez at laposte. | |net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-02-22 15:38:11 EDT --- I take the review of this this little but useful software. The spec seems to be ok, but refering to the INSTALL doc, Gtk2 is missing as a "BuildRequires". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 20:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485973] Review Request: maxr - A classic turn-based strategy game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222052.n1MKqqpg019353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485973 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 21:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226027] Merge Review: libICE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222129.n1MLTUHo024883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226027 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-22 16:29:28 EDT --- So rpmlint is just: libICE.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libICE.so.6.3.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libICE-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Neither of those is really a problem, although there's probably a bug in the first one. I made some tweaks in CVS: - Minor changes to - Don't own /usr/include/X11 - No need for a versioned dependency on xorg-x11-filesystem. - Change xorg-x11-filesystem to a regular dependency. Honestly I'm not sure why the -devel package had Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem since it has no scriptlets. I hope I'm not missing something. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 13055e2f4c645cbd135ce97a7974a5866f9ba3ed8988e686b552f55c30514f04 libICE-1.0.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libICE-1.0.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm libICE.so.6()(64bit) libICE = 1.0.4-6.fc11 libICE(x86-64) = 1.0.4-6.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libICE.so.6()(64bit) libICE-devel-1.0.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(ice) = 1.0.4 libICE-devel = 1.0.4-6.fc11 libICE-devel(x86-64) = 1.0.4-6.fc11 = /usr/bin/pkg-config libICE = 1.0.4-6.fc11 libICE.so.6()(64bit) pkgconfig pkgconfig(xproto) xorg-x11-filesystem xorg-x11-proto-devel * a shared library is present: ldconfig is called properly unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, and closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 21:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222132.n1MLW3vK020725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #3 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-22 16:32:02 EDT --- Thanks a lot for your comments. (In reply to comment #2) > Some comments about the spec : > 1) Source0 should be an URL (the appropriate one : > http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/releases/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0.tar.gz) Done > 2) The PTS is a PHP program so the package doesn't need a particular > architecture. Add "BuildArch: noarch" after "BuildRoot:" Done > 3) Where do you find all this dependencies ? The PTS site just give me "php-gd" > and "php-cli" ; for the rest, I suppose that the "External Dependencies" > feature work with yum. It is true you only need "php-gd" and "php-cli" to run the program. However, when you run the program it executes the script found in the source phoronix-test-suite/pts/distro-scripts/install-fedora-packages.sh which scans phoronix-test-suite/pts/distro-xml/fedora-packages.xml and asks the user to download all those packages. (So I got all the dependencies from the fedora-packages.xml file) I thought it would be better to have Fedora install those packages for the user up front then have PTS do it. What would you prefer? > 4) Add a %build section even if it's empty Done Here are the new files: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm whit the new rpmlint: rpmlint phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/phoronix-test-suite/pts-core/modules/dummy_script_module.sh 0644 phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: devel-dependency SDL-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency compat-libstdc++-33 phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXv-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXvMC-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libaio-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg-devel phoronix-test-suite.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng-devel 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 22:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222205.n1MM5xXh026393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-22 17:05:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I take the review of this this little but useful software. Thanks a lot! > The spec seems to be > ok, but refering to the INSTALL doc, Gtk2 is missing as a "BuildRequires". Indeed. Usually gtk2-devel is so redundant that it gets pulled in automatically, but in this case it might be better to list is explicitly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 22:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222204.n1MM4EY0025780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen 2009-02-22 17:04:12 EDT --- Initial comments: You need the standard Mono package build magic including comment: # Bug 241850 - no Mono on pp64 ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha Notable rpmlint output to care about: flickrnet-devel.x86_64: E: percent-in-provides pkgconfig(flickrnet) %{version} We always use .NET not .Net as that is the registered name for the framework. Aside that you clean up nicely after yourself, and the package compiles in mock (x86_64 rawhide, F-10 and F-9) == formal review == - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. License file not included. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. d20fe0d25a3888300f21e5ad3895c141 ../YOURS/FlickrNet-25207.zip d20fe0d25a3888300f21e5ad3895c141 ../UPSTREAMS/FlickrNet-25207.zip OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. FAIL see above. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK APPROVED, provided you fix the noted issues before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 22:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222220.n1MMKLiJ028528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.hutterer at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 22:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222250.n1MMooSX005323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-02-22 17:50:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flickrnet Short Description: .NET library to interact with the Flickr API Owners: palango Branches: F-9, F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 22:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222250.n1MMoMfs000673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #4 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-02-22 17:50:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 3) Where do you find all this dependencies ? The PTS site just give me "php-gd" > > and "php-cli" ; for the rest, I suppose that the "External Dependencies" > > feature work with yum. > > It is true you only need "php-gd" and "php-cli" to run the program. However, > when you run the program it executes the script found in the source > phoronix-test-suite/pts/distro-scripts/install-fedora-packages.sh which scans > phoronix-test-suite/pts/distro-xml/fedora-packages.xml and asks the user to > download all those packages. (So I got all the dependencies from the > fedora-packages.xml file) > > I thought it would be better to have Fedora install those packages for the user > up front then have PTS do it. What would you prefer? > Good question. I will ask a package guru :-) Anyway, you can remove the "explicite-lib" indicated by rpmlint and also SDL-devel, openal, freeimage (dependencies not detected by rpmlint). Also you can rename "qt4-devel" (this is for legacy version) to "qt-devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 23:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222306.n1MN6VvD003149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-02-22 18:06:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > No, duedlines say what CVS, not released versions must start from 0. > Definitely, I can't agree. > Version 0.9 have been published on 2006-06-06 > So this is a post-release version > Read : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Ok, you are right. Version release enumaration changed. > I prefer using %{name}.xml rather than %{peclName}.xml (or %{peclName}2.xml) > (see recent approved changes in PHP Guidelines, this is to avoid possible > conflicts between pecl, pear and other channel extensions). Ok, let it be so. > I need to search if %verify(not md5 mtime size) is acceptable in the > Guidelines... > > Is the spec encoding ok ? It seems there is UTF-8 (ru sumnary) and ISO (pl > sumnary) which make my text editor crazy ? Polish summary and description recoded from iso8859-2 to UTF-8. > $ file php-pecl-runkit.spec > php-pecl-runkit.spec: Non-ISO extended-ASCII text, with LF, NEL line > terminators Now: $ file php-pecl-runkit.spec php-pecl-runkit.spec: UTF-8 Unicode text http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-runkit/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-7.CVS20090215.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 23:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222308.n1MN8hRX008203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |php-pear-Crypt_Blowfish - |php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - |quick two-way blowfish |Quick two-way blowfish |encryption |encryption --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-02-22 18:08:42 EDT --- Renamed and updated to follow suggestions : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.2.rc2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 22 23:10:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:10:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486010] Review Request: mrbs - Meeting Room Booking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902222310.n1MNAUmb003975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486010 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-02-22 18:10:29 EDT --- New version : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/mrbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/mrbs-1.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 00:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230056.n1N0us9q022418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-22 19:56:53 EDT --- Package should use parallel build: waf %{?_smp_mflags} build -v -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 00:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230058.n1N0wKTJ022573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Joseph Smidt 2009-02-22 19:58:19 EDT --- Okay, looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 01:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230135.n1N1ZPEl030277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #56 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-02-22 20:35:22 EDT --- Is there anything more I can do from the Samba4 development standpoint to help this along? Do you need another alpha snapshot, or is it OK to cut a GIT revision at the appropriate time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 01:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230150.n1N1oukp005684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-22 20:50:55 EDT --- Oh. I also just noticed that this package doesn't seem to honor the standard rpm CFLAGS. Is there any reason for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 02:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230259.n1N2xfeF019944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #15 from Paul F. Kunz 2009-02-22 21:59:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Now missing "BuildRequires: libicu-devel" instead of "libicu". > fixed, stupid mistake. > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144346 > > Failed to build because of missing build requirements: > > BuildRequires: tex(latex) > BuildRequires: tex(dvips) > # redundant through latex > # BuildRequires: tex(tex) > tex is not used except by dosygen, but make docs doesn't generate tex. I added the above anyway. > > After adding those, it fails on i386 (dist-f11-gcc44) with a strange CMake > Error occuring multiple times: > > CMake Error at cmake_modules/AddSrcSubfolder.cmake:42 (FILE): > file RelativePath must be passed a full path to the file: > ??E ??E ??E I don't know what to do about that error as I don't see it on Fedora 10 i386 nor Fedora 9 x64 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144362 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1144362&name=build.log > > > Pending F10 scratch-build attempt is here: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144376 Fedora.org was down for maintainence most of the weekend, so I couldn't see these logs. However, see next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 03:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:02:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230302.n1N32EME020908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #16 from Paul F. Kunz 2009-02-22 22:02:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Fedora 10 x86_64: > > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib64/libzorba_simplestore.* > > These are installed into /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64 (%_libdir). Same > applies to other files. > > > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so.0.9.5 > > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so > > -- Up-to-date: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so.0.9.5 > > -- Up-to-date: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so > > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/zorba_api.py > > -- Installing: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_zorba_api.so I had to patch the upstream sources, but this is fixed and tested on x86_64 machine New upload.. SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.5-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 03:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230308.n1N38pcp022443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #57 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-22 22:08:49 EDT --- Summary of some offline conversation with Simo: The approach we're going to try is to stick with the existing Samba4 package already under review here, but for Fedora 11 disable the bits not needed by OpenChange. Basically lobotomize Samba4 until we're ready to support it. Simo needs a more recent revision of talloc and tdb, so we'll patch Samba3 to provide that (assuming those libraries haven't broken backward compatibility). I expect OpenChange to be frozen at 0.8 for the duration of Fedora 11, so alpha6 is sufficient for me. If Simo needs something newer I'd prefer a new upstream release over rolling my own GIT revision, to avoid distro-specific quirks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 03:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230319.n1N3JfOk024951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #58 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-02-22 22:19:38 EDT --- I fully support this plan of action. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 03:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230330.n1N3UKb1022119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #59 from Simo Sorce 2009-02-22 22:30:18 EDT --- Yep I definitely need the latest tevent and ldb code from samba4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 04:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230445.n1N4jpsp009432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-22 23:45:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 04:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479798] Review Request: perl-Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings - Catch your forked server's warnings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230446.n1N4khAT009638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479798 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-22 23:46:42 EDT --- Ok then will close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 04:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482965] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator - perl XML generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230445.n1N4jPgk004540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482965 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-22 23:45:24 EDT --- Can you close this review if this package is built for all requested branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 05:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Supports mo/po files and Maketext classes under your applications I18N namespace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 05:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Catalyst::Plugin::Session::State::URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client, and extracting the session ID from requested URIs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 05:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230527.n1N5Rq6E018063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 05:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230528.n1N5SD9X013493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 06:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230603.n1N637rj020527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-23 01:03:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm * Mon Feb 23 2009 Jens Petersen - 0.7-1 - cabal2spec-0.7: - use %%global instead of %%define - quieten output of scripts - updates urls to fedorahosted Source and tarballs now on fedorahosted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230730.n1N7UIdD010659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-23 02:30:16 EDT --- I decided to finish the package. SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse-1.0-0.3.rc1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 1:1.0-0.3.rc1 - Handle the Provides list within the SPEC file - Add gcc-4.4 patch - Fix size_t warnings - Explain the various licenses I did not get the DocBook issue in the rawhide build. Maybe it is fixed(?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230729.n1N7TtC5010278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-23 02:29:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144955 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d5931735f643885ee33ed5b7cbb1fcf7 Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=27, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.82 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.91 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08-1.fc11-noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::I18N) = 0.08 Requires: perl(I18N::LangTags) perl(I18N::LangTags::Detect) perl(Locale::Maketext::Simple) perl(NEXT) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) you should remove following from SPEC Requires: perl(Catalyst::Runtime) Requires: perl(Locale::Maketext::Lexicon) BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.8.0 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 07:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230729.n1N7Tmr6005550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-23 02:29:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1144956 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 89d5967c47b3563cfadd3dfc48611862 Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=100, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.77 cusr 0.17 csys = 0.97 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08-1.fc11-noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::State::URI) = 0.08 Requires: perl(HTML::TokeParser::Simple) perl(MIME::Types) perl(MRO::Compat) perl(URI) perl(URI::Find) perl(URI::QueryParam) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestions: 1) drop BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.8.0 from SPEC file 2) remove following requires Requires: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) >= 0.06 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230908.n1N98XsU000591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-23 04:08:30 EDT --- Mea culpa. I recently have similar issue in different packages and I find that you *should* own the directories: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/WWW /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/WWW/SMS /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/WWW/SMS/IE Which you already own. So you had it correctly. Sorry for confusion. So please just upload new version with updated Source0 and that will be all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230911.n1N9BavA001881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-23 04:11:34 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1145408 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d2586c3c99e2ae06c8721409cf440343 cabal2spec-0.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230918.n1N9IaNe003728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-02-23 04:18:35 EDT --- why doesent it obsolete the package if it is going to replace it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486865] Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230919.n1N9JCCJ003827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486865 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-23 04:19:11 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 92f93fb928f9294f3e48897ee6d5c12b186913d9 arptools-1.0.2.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230924.n1N9OEL3005013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-23 04:24:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I decided to finish the package. > > SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse.spec > SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/muse-1.0-0.3.rc1.fc10.src.rpm > > Changelog: 1:1.0-0.3.rc1 > - Handle the Provides list within the SPEC file > - Add gcc-4.4 patch > - Fix size_t warnings > - Explain the various licenses > > I did not get the DocBook issue in the rawhide build. Maybe it is fixed(?) It seems so. I did a full review and it looks very good now! Approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230924.n1N9Oug1005137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-23 04:24:54 EDT --- The LaTeX/TeX/dvips BuildRequires in comment 13 are because of this build failure in koji: -- latex command LATEX_COMPILER not found but usually required. You will probably get warnings and user inetraction on doxy run. -- makeindex command MAKEINDEX_COMPILER not found but usually required. -- dvips command DVIPS_CONVERTER not found but usually required. [...] -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! /usr/bin/makeindex is provided by package "texlive", so if LaTeX is truely optional, you would need the "tex(tex)" BuildRequires I marked redundant. [...] * src.rpm size has increased by factor 3. The spec %changelog doesn't mention that you've replaced the source tarball with one that differs from the previous package by a 25M diff. In case it is a snapshot retrieved from a SCM system, you need to follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages * rpmdev-diff also reveals an added space character in the %cmake invocation that is not commented on. Two of the three -D options now put a space between -D and the variable name. No reason to believe it doesn't work, it's just strange. With other commands, silently added whitespace may lead to problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin, A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230926.n1N9QND4002270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-23 04:26:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: marlin Short Description: A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME Owners: dodji Branches: F-10 InitialCC: dodji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486292] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-CLAC - NOCpulse Command Line Application framework for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230930.n1N9UQc5003288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486292 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 09:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902230953.n1N9rUPt008691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #25 from Bruno Mahe 2009-02-23 04:53:29 EDT --- I have fixed most of the issues. About the directory ownership issue note in comment #24, I have been quite verbose to avoid unnecessary and unrelated directory inclusion. Otherwise I would end up with empty directories named "CMakeFiles" or "ibmsdk". Or should I explicitly delete them ? Here is the updated SPEC file: http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet.spec Here is the updated SRPM : http://www.gnoll.org/download/bullet-2.73-5.fc10.src.rpm Thank you very much for your patience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486865] Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231005.n1NA58hn014913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486865 Jakub Hrozek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486865] Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231004.n1NA4biP011286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486865 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Hrozek 2009-02-23 05:04:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: arptools Short Description: Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities Owners: jhrozek Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231011.n1NABXiM013000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231014.n1NAENfn013402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-23 05:14:22 EDT --- Looks like the only concern is making sure legal is ok with the license. Is that right, Alex? I've already talked to upstream (sort of; Sage upstream anyways) about the license quite a bit but they don't choose to ship a license I believe. (After all, it is a very small library.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475322] Review Request: genus2reduction - Computes Reductions of Genus 2 Proper Smooth Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231024.n1NAOKdx019115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475322 --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster 2009-02-23 05:24:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looks like the only concern is making sure legal is ok with the license. Is > that right, Alex? I've already talked to upstream (sort of; Sage upstream > anyways) about the license quite a bit but they don't choose to ship a license > I believe. (After all, it is a very small library.) Yep, that's the only (minor) issue. Somebody posted a link to more recent e-mail correspondence on #fedora-devel: http://lists.pardus.org.tr/paketler-commits/2008-January/042349.html that seemed to indicate GPLv2 (no "+"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231028.n1NASx4C020229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #27 from Liang Suilong 2009-02-23 05:28:58 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka? I have uploaded a new package for iptux. The latest version is 0.45-rc3. Here is url: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.5-0.1.rc3.fc10.src.rpm Because of too many bugs, I dropped this version. I think it is not important. The author said that he also was not satisfied with iptux-0.4.5-rc2. In the meanwhile I think Fedora need a stable software, not one full of bugs. In iptux-0.4.5-rc3, the author add quite many functions. For example warning sounds. Maybe we should add gstreamer and gstreamer-devel into BuildRequires. But I am not sure, I do not do it. I try to use mock to test. But my mock is too slow when it is running yum. Maybe my bandwidth speed is too low. Another question, is it really dbus-devel? I try many times. I do not think it need dbus-devel. Maybe I need to test more times. Regards, Liang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231045.n1NAj9Jj024061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #11 from Oded Arbel 2009-02-23 05:45:07 EDT --- Matthew - where can I report problems with the evolution-mapi implementation (not the package)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486680] Review Request: chisholm-banana-peels-fonts - A Decorative Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231049.n1NAnMS4024768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486680 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(josephsmidt at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-23 05:49:21 EDT --- 1. The official template evolved a little lately, please use /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec from fontpackages-devel ? 1.20 as target. Tools like meld can help you see the differences (you can find latest fotpackages here if it has not hit a mirror next you yet http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7288 ) 1.a replace your %define with %global 1.b. Drop this # Do not trust font metadata versionning unless you've checked upstream does # update versions on file changes. When in doubt use the timestamp of the most # recent file as version. 1.c and drop this %dir %{_fontdir} 2. The timestamp of the font file inside the zip you use as source is 20090125, please use it as version. What matters is when upstream created a file, not when you packaged it 3. The font name declared by the TTF is "Banana", that's what you need to use in your fontconfig file (OTOH a font named "Banana" with a "Peels" face/style is going to drive apps crazy, please ask upstream to rename the font to "Banana Peels" with a standard "book", "regular" or maybe "bold" face/style) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 10:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231054.n1NAsqh4025991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-23 05:54:51 EDT --- Just a nitpicking The font declares itself as "Rubbing Font". That's what fontconfig and apps will see, so that's also what you need to use in your fontconfig rules (I agree the "Font" bit is quite silly and upstream would be well advised to drop it) BTW, there are a few minor template changes in fontpackages-devel 1.20, but nothing dangerous and your current spec will also work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 11:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486937] New: Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486937 Summary: Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnlib/rhnlib.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnlib/rhnlib-2.5.10-1.src.rpm Description: rhnlib is a collection of python modules used by the Red Hat Network (http://rhn.redhat.com) software. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1145761 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 11:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231135.n1NBZbDl000844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #14 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-23 06:35:33 EDT --- I've tried to use the package (both with and without the libXpm-devel BR) in a F-10 guest and results were... strange: - if run from a GUI (direct access from the VM GUI), I can see the message "press PAUSE or mouse right button for menu" on the topmost line of the screen. The rest of the screen is filled with an ugly backgroun, vaguely similar to a text screen (the aspect from the turbo vision GUI from the '90s ) full of stars (one star per cell). The only way to interact is to press the right button of the mouse, keep it pressed while moving over the desired menu entry and release the button only after the mouse is over the desired entry. Not the most intuitive interface... I've never seen that before on any system that I've worked with, since the era of SFDX - if run from a text console (ssh from the host text console), the mouse is not detected at all (I am offered the choice RETURN to start the app without mouse support or CTRL-C to kill it). After starting without mouse support, I failed to identify the right keyboard combination to trigger any menu action. The screen is once again filled with some blue-ish sort of background -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 12:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231201.n1NC1lYH009785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #22 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-02-23 07:01:38 EDT --- new package: squirrelmail-1.4.17-2.fc11 changes: * plugins/demo moved to /usr/share/doc/squirrelmail * bugzila numbers for patches * new patch for big UIDs and 32b systems - with upstream bugzilla link I'm sorry for my slow response, but I have a lot of work now and I prefer to fix not working things first. Anyway, thanks for doing this review. Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 12:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231218.n1NCIsVa014144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Lis? 2009-02-23 07:18:51 EDT --- Do you think about making default firewall configuration? Similar settings are made in Ubuntu CE but through firehol package. This is what I use for my children's computers in combination with tinyproxy (running under nobody user on 3128 port): cp -a /etc/sysconfig/iptables /etc/sysconfig/iptables-dansguardian-backup sed \ -e '/-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited/a\ \ # dansguargian settings\ # --- begin\ -A OUTPUT -d 127.0.0.1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 3128 -m owner ! --uid-owner nobody -j DROP\ # --- end\ ' \ -e '/^\*filter/i\ \ # tinyproxy settings\ # --- begin\ *nat\ :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]\ :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]\ :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]\ :in_trproxy.1 - [0:0]\ :out_trproxy.1 - [0:0]\ -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --sport 1000:65535 --dport 80 -j in_trproxy.1\ -A in_trproxy.1 -p tcp -j REDIRECT --to-ports 8080\ -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --sport 32768:61000 --dport 80 -j out_trproxy.1\ -A out_trproxy.1 -m owner --uid-owner nobody -j RETURN\ -A out_trproxy.1 -m owner --uid-owner root -j RETURN\ -A out_trproxy.1 -d 127.0.0.1 -j RETURN\ -A out_trproxy.1 -p tcp -j REDIRECT --to-ports 8080\ -A OUTPUT -j ACCEPT\ COMMIT\ # --- end\ ' /etc/sysconfig/iptables-dansguardian-backup > /etc/sysconfig/iptables This is useful when you want deny all http traffic outside except defined users (nobody = tinyproxy user, root = yum update, ...) You don't need make proxy setting in browser too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 12:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231221.n1NCLPAn011798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-23 07:21:23 EDT --- Hi Jim, Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/03/fence-agents.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/02/fence-agents-3.0.0-3.alpha5.fc11.src.rpm Updated everything with new upstream tarball and incorporated the changes from upstream and packaging that you asked during the review. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 12:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486937] Review Request: rhnlib - Python libraries for the RHN project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231223.n1NCNKmM015171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486937 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |rhnlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 12:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231224.n1NCO7w8015294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com Alias| |spacewalk-koan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 12:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231227.n1NCRUQs016155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-02-23 07:27:28 EDT --- First stab at this package: 1) On BuildRequires: You only need to require xerces-c-devel (this package requires the non-devel main package as per the guidelines for -devel sub-packages). Minor issue, no showstopper. 2) rpmlint: $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/blahtexml-0.6-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm blahtexml.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long Blahtex is a program written in C++, which converts an equation given in a syntax close to TeX into MathML. It is designed by David Harvey and is aimed at supporting equations in MediaWiki. blahtexml.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long Blahtexml is a simple extension of blahtex. In addition to the functionality of blahtex, blahtexml has XML processing in mind and is able to process a whole XML document into another XML document. Instead of converting only one formula at a time, blahtexml can convert all the formulas of the given XML file into MathML. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Easily fixed, of course ;-) 3) Source0: Source0 should be the URL to the upstream tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231302.n1ND2tgB024474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 --- Comment #2 from Jasper Capel 2009-02-23 08:02:54 EDT --- Thanks. I have modified the files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231314.n1NDEAY6027097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-23 08:14:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > why doesent it obsolete the package if it is going to replace it? Because it doesn't. It does replace FILES shipped in the xserver package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231335.n1NDZkg3032414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-02-23 08:35:45 EDT --- Whenever you do, please; - bump the release number in the .spec (and add/modify changelog entry/entries) - rebuild the source rpm with the new spec - upload - link the new spec file - link the new srpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231334.n1NDYKca031875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-23 08:34:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > > > * These 2 rpmlint messages: > > grid-packaging-tools.noarch: E: non-executable-script > > /usr/share/globus/aclocal/bootstrap.frg 0644 > > grid-packaging-tools.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 115, > > tab: line 1) > > The /usr/share/globus/aclocal/bootstrap.frg file is a script fragment - it is > not intended to be executable standalone. It does have a shebang so that when > put together with other pieces to create a complete script that script will be > executable. Making the fragment executable would silence rpmlint, but it would > contradict the intended usage of the file. > Ok, I'm fine with ignoring the rpmlint output then > The specfile uses tabs everywhere for indentation. However it is not possible > to enter 1.375 tabs. For this you have do 1 tab + 3 spaces. Line 115 (now 120) > starts with a tab, so I don't see why rpmlint complains about it using spaces > for indentation. If there at some place in the file was a tab immediately > following a space, or a set of 2 or more consecutive spaces crossing or ending > at an even 8 column boundary then the warning would make sense. This is not the > case. I consider this warning a "false positive" - at least for my > understanding of what mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs means. > I agree, one could even call it a bug, so ignore this one too. > New version available here: > > http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/grid-packaging-tools.spec > http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/grid-packaging-tools-3.2-14.fc10.src.rpm Looks good! Once 2 more packages are in good shape I'll sponsor you and approve all 3. I'm not doing the approving right now, as some people run scripts in the flags that sets, checking all approved packages have been imported in to CVS, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231338.n1NDcwVP029579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2009-02-23 08:38:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > SHOULD FIX: > > ----------- > > * rpmlint warning: > > globus-core.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 116, tab: line > > 1) > > This is the same thing as in the grid-packaging-tools package - I still think > this is a false positive. > And I still agree :) > > * How did you come to the devel / non-devel split. Atleast the aclocal and > > doxygen > > files look like devel files to me. Only files which are needed to *run* > > globus > > tk using applications should be in the main package, the rest should all be > > in > > the devel package > > The globus-core package is very different from the rest of the globus packages. > All of globus-core is devel, none of it is needed at runtime. I did the split > so that architecture independent files are in the main package and the > architecture dependent files are in the devel-package. For a i386 on x86_64 > installation you could then install main + devel from x86_64 and devel from > i386. I found that to be the most natural split if a split should be done. > Thinking about it, it might make more sense to just put all the files in main > and not split it into subpackages. You could then still install both i386 and > x86_64 together since the common files would be exactly the same. Is more > sensible? > Yes please do it that way, but keep the -devel subpackage and put all the files in the %files of the devel subpackage. If you then also remove the %files line itself for the main package, only the subpackage will be build. This way we have a srpm and specfile name matching upstream, and still have a -devel extension to make clear this is a devel package > > * Given the short list of files in the package I see no need for all the magic > > to generate filelists. Why not just add everything manually (with wildcards) > > to %files, that way it is much clearer what is going on > > There is no magic here. The split between packages is automatically defined by > gpt. What is done is simply a format conversion form the gpt filelist format to > the rpm filelist format. I agree that in the case of globus-core, which is not > split in so many sub packages you don't gain a lot. The gain is much more > noticeable in packages that generate four or five sub packages. From a package > maintainability point of view it is however much easier to use the same > packaging instructions for all globus packages, though it is a slight overkill > for globus-core. > Ok. > > * Why do you filter out the requires on the gpt modules, the -devel package > > requiring gpt is fine, and if the main package gets auto requires for gpt > > that feels like a hint that the package is not split properly. > > As I said, all of globus-core is really devel. No non-devel package requires > globus-core. However all globus-*-devel packages require globus-core and If you > install a globus-*-devel package for anything else than building other globus > packages you don't need gpt. I really don't like having gpt being dragged in by > anything. I consider this a major feature of the packaging. > Ok. > I didn't prepare a new package yet, since you indicated that you might have > additional comments already. Let me know if you want me to create a new package > version at this stage. Please do a new version without the package split, then I'll do a full review of that one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231349.n1NDnq67032200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 --- Comment #4 from Jasper Capel 2009-02-23 08:49:51 EDT --- As you wish :-) specfile: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml.spec source-rpm: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml-0.6-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 13:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486961] New: Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Summary: Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rrakus at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/a/ac/Libservicelog.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/0/03/Libservicelog-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The libservicelgo package contains a library to create and maintain a database for storing events related to system service. This database allows for the logging of serviceable and informational events, and for the logging of service procedures that have been performed upon the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 14:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231431.n1NEVT2U014063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ovasik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 14:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231434.n1NEYjAD011112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 15:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486977] New: Review Request: gnu-free-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnu-free-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Summary: Review Request: gnu-free-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 477336 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Rename review, as well as work for font guidelines for bug 477336. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/gnu-free-fonts/gnu-free-fonts-20090104-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 15:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:36:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231536.n1NFaB6J026649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-23 10:36:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Mamoru Tasaka? > > I have uploaded a new package for iptux. The latest version is > 0.45-rc3. Here is url: > http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/iptux/iptux-0.4.5-0.1.rc3.fc10.src.rpm - Unfortunately this does not build completely. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1146112 - By the way don't downgrade EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) during review request. 0.4.5-0.1.rc3 < 0.4.5-0.2.rc1 > Another question, is it really dbus-devel? I try many times. I do not > think it need dbus-devel. Maybe I need to test more times. - See bug 485667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 15:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231544.n1NFiOuD032386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-02-23 10:44:23 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 15:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231542.n1NFgu5h032161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-02-23 10:42:54 EDT --- It's been over 2 months. Are you planning to work on this package any more? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 15:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483360] Review Request: pdfshuffler - PDF file merging, rearranging, and spliting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231553.n1NFrn3a002465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483360 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-23 10:53:48 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1756 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1746 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 15:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472337] Review Request: fabric - A simple pythonic remote deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231555.n1NFtw3w031868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472337 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: Marlin - A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231600.n1NG00Sm003881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Marlin, A |Review Request: Marlin - A |Sound Sample Editor for |Sound Sample Editor for |GNOME. |GNOME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231622.n1NGMlQr006263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 Bug 486561 depends on bug 486558, which changed state. Bug 486558 Summary: Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231622.n1NGMktb006233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mono-nat-1.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from David Nielsen 2009-02-23 11:22:44 EDT --- Closing, Mono.Nat will be in Rawhide as of next update and F9+10 will follow shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231629.n1NGTY5Z007556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet 2009-02-23 11:29:32 EDT --- You should remove (probably a paste error, already defined above) ---------------------------- BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) Requires: php-pear(PEAR) Requires(post): %{__pear} Requires(postun): %{__pear} Provides: php-pear(foo) = %{version} ---------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231633.n1NGXfcr012351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-23 11:33:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N Short Description: I18N for Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231635.n1NGZEeQ012903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-23 11:35:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI Short Description: Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231639.n1NGdmEv010361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-23 11:39:46 EDT --- Okay, now as this package itself is good: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231654.n1NGsMVE016821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-02-23 11:54:21 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.src: I: checking php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.noarch: I: checking php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + no license file in sources + sources match the upstream sources 09f0e38a4d524ba4102db5d11b07ffe9 Crypt_Blowfish-1.1.0RC2.tgz + Source URL ok + build / run on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + test suite ok (2 PASSED TESTS) + scriptlets ok - Final Requires ok, but see previous comments - Final Provides ko, see previous comments php-pear(foo) = 1.1.0 Just fix the previous comment and I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231654.n1NGsoYU016884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #12 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-02-23 11:54:47 EDT --- Sorry, $DAYJOB exploded on me for a couple of weeks there. :) It's more elegant to BuildRequire the demo package and move the file where you need it (+ change package, whatever), but I don't think it would be wrong to just include the file itself as a separate Source: file in the SRPM. Whichever you prefer, I'd say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231655.n1NGtZL9014126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-23 11:55:34 EDT --- One comment: - Please update icon cache script when importing to Fedora CVS. ref: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-February/msg01604.html https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 16:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:59:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487007] New: Review Request: python-stomp - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-stomp - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Summary: Review Request: python-stomp - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-stomp/python-stomp.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-stomp-0.2.2-2.src.rpm Description: This is a python client implementation of the STOMP protocol. The client is attempting to be transport layer neutral. This module provides functions to create and parse STOMP messages in a programatic fashion. I'll need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomp - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231701.n1NH1PAi015529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |silas at sewell.ch Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231725.n1NHP9ae023342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-23 12:25:07 EDT --- Thanks everyone, Hans, for the review Mamoru and Ralf, for their comments Kevin, for the provides script Fernando, for the initial SPEC file Mamoru, I'll update the script. Thanks again. I'm adding Fernando to the owners. Please let me know if there's anyone else who wants to maintain or audit this package New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: muse Short Description: Midi/Audio Music Sequencer Owners: oget nando Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:33:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231733.n1NHXoL0026010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #18 from Paul F. Kunz 2009-02-23 12:33:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > The LaTeX/TeX/dvips BuildRequires in comment 13 are because of this build > failure in koji: > > -- latex command LATEX_COMPILER not found but usually required. You will > probably get warnings and user inetraction on doxy run. > -- makeindex command MAKEINDEX_COMPILER not found but usually required. > -- dvips command DVIPS_CONVERTER not found but usually required. > [...] > -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! > > /usr/bin/makeindex is provided by package "texlive", so if LaTeX is truely > optional, you would need the "tex(tex)" BuildRequires I marked redundant. > Ok, I put that in. > [...] > > * src.rpm size has increased by factor 3. The spec %changelog doesn't mention > that you've replaced the source tarball with one that differs from the previous > package by a 25M diff. I realized in the middle of the night that I packaged the wrong version of the sources. The large size difference is due to additional files releated to the testsuite used by the upstream developers. This is fixed now. Sorry about the error. > * rpmdev-diff also reveals an added space character in the %cmake invocation > that is not commented on. Two of the three -D options now put a space between > -D and the variable name. No reason to believe it doesn't work, it's just > strange. With other commands, silently added whitespace may lead to problems. I've made the white space consistent. New upload SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.5-4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231742.n1NHgXUc027664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-02-23 12:42:32 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Base.src: I: checking php-ezc-Base.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 27d5d39a21668eb3fbae60cc4aa8f0c2 Base-1.6.1.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-channel(components.ez.no) php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(PEAR) + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) = 1.6.1 php-ezc-Base = 1.6.1-2.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231743.n1NHhMOU026941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #19 from D Haley 2009-02-23 12:43:17 EDT --- Updating SRPM/SPEC to latest. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.1-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/scilab-5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji: No, due to missing deps Rpmlint: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/scilab-5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm | grep -v lang 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 441 warnings. These are due to the file extension. These are not translation files. $ rpmlint scilab.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/scilab-5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Known issues: Currently scilab is affected by a bug which causes a startup crash [1]. This SRPM will, against current F10, exhibit this crash. However this should not be related to the SPEC/SRPM, and as the depends of this bug are not done, I don't see this as a huge problem [1] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 18:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231800.n1NI0BPh031728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Geoff Levand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 17:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231758.n1NHwePB030751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-02-23 12:58:39 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-ConsoleTools.src: I: checking php-ezc-ConsoleTools.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources b680b22c79f7e665e604354f6bdb3383 ConsoleTools-1.5.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 - not tested with mock + no test suite + scriptlets ok - Final Requires KO - Final Provides KO MUST fixe (ezc => components.ez.no) : Requires: php-pear(%{channel}/Base) >= 1.6 Provides: php-pear(%{channel}/%{pear_name}) = %{version} To be removed (already required by Base) Requires: php-pear(PEAR) Requires: php-channel(%{channel}) Requires php-common >= 5.2.1 could be kept as it could be different (between packages) in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 18:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231819.n1NIJ1Xl003451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-23 13:19:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Base Short Description: Provides the basic infrastructure that all packages rely on Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 18:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486686] Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231841.n1NIfwXU009408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486686 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-23 13:41:57 EDT --- chitlesh(~)[0]$tkgate I could not locate the tkgate home directory. I tried looking in: /home/chitlesh (current directory) /usr/share/tkgate (primary location) /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/BUILD/tkgate-2.0-b6 (secondary location) Try setting the environment variable TKGATE_HOME. ------------------- Can you fix this please before I start the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 18:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231850.n1NIoqnq011822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Ant Bryan 2009-02-23 13:50:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: metalink Short Description: A command line Metalink Generator. Owners: ant Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 18:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231847.n1NIlim7009918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Ant Bryan 2009-02-23 13:47:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gget Short Description: Download Manager for the GNOME desktop Owners: ant Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231911.n1NJBJqi016383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 --- Comment #4 from Niall Sheridan 2009-02-23 14:11:17 EDT --- Thanks for clearing that up. I've updated the package to the latest version, tested on i386 and x86_64 and fixed Source0. Version 3.32 is at: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/o2sms/perl-o2sms.spec http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/o2sms/perl-o2sms-3.32-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231926.n1NJQewD021506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-23 14:26:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1147253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231927.n1NJRXKe021747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-02-23 14:27:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Remi. This is indeed a cut and paste error... Fixed version : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481531] Review Request: perl-Test-Dynamic - Automatic test counting for Test::More In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231946.n1NJkxwN024316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481531 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-23 14:46:57 EDT --- look https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/2009-February/000191.html my real intention is to add bucardo into fedora, but Test::Dynamic is going away, it's not required to bucardo work, only required for testsuit, I don't like to include this package now and orphan it later. Can you take a look in bucardo review request ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:54:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231954.n1NJsmo2028020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231954.n1NJsbPc027979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 Hedayat Vatankhah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hedayat at grad.com --- Comment #2 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-02-23 14:54:35 EDT --- Just a brief look: 1. Don't forget to fix the version number in your changelog section. Currently it doesn't match with the version of the package itself. 2. I don't know why, but it doesn't run on my system (with an Intel graphic card!) and crashes with a segmentation fault :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231956.n1NJuh6m026853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #71 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-23 14:56:36 EDT --- any news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902231955.n1NJtMKB026590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-23 14:55:17 EDT --- Any news ? Btw I think you were right, the license is indeed LGPLv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 19:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487044] New: Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Summary: Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/eee-control.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/eee-control-0.8.4-1.src.rpm Description: eee-control is an easy-to-use utility that aims to be a one-stop solution for all special Linux Eee PC needs. It allows you to configure hardware and hotkeys, switch between performance levels (very much like Asus' Super Hybrid Engine) and more. rpmlint output: eee-control.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/eee-control-daemon eee-control.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/eee-control-daemon $prog eee-control.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name eee-control-daemon 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 20:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232014.n1NKEAbv031187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #8 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-23 15:14:09 EDT --- Hi Fabio, I looked at http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/fas/03/fence-agents-3.0.0-3.alpha5.fc11.src.rpm (note the s/02/03/) and see you added README.license and changed fence_vmware_helper.pl to detect write errors among other things. However, mock still fails due to what looks like a yum bug. If you can report that or determine that it's not a problem, I'd say just skip it. Jim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 20:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232017.n1NKHGkS001387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-23 15:17:14 EDT --- Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification you make. It is easier to track. (In reply to comment #7) > As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they > claim that Debian requires it the way they do it. Shared libraries should have a proper versioned soname. I really doubt Debian forbids that. http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html You can make one but problems will appear in case upstream decides on a different scheme later on. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname Starting with .0 for major is the best way. I still think you should insist on proper soname upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 20:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232037.n1NKbOmh006861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-23 15:37:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Please bump & post your spec and srpm for each modification you make. It is > easier to track. Sorry, forgot to do that. They're at: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-3.fc11.src.rpm > (In reply to comment #7) > > As for upstream, they do not want to change how they do the sonames as they > > claim that Debian requires it the way they do it. > Shared libraries should have a proper versioned soname. I really doubt Debian > forbids that. > http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html > > You can make one but problems will appear in case upstream decides on a > different scheme later on. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname > Starting with .0 for major is the best way. I still think you should insist on > proper soname upstream. I have told them upstream, and I think they will with the next release. For now I have .0 as you suggest. I think it's now kosher wrt sonames, please let me know otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 20:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232052.n1NKq2ev010039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #32 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-23 15:51:58 EDT --- Very nice, however... the %changelog entry you've just added contains an empty line: - Yes, I know I'm being awfully picky. ;) Of course you can fix it after importing, because this package is now APPROVED. Great work and thanks for bearing with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 20:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487052] New: Review Request: dc3dd - Patched version of GNU dd for use in computer forensics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dc3dd - Patched version of GNU dd for use in computer forensics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487052 Summary: Review Request: dc3dd - Patched version of GNU dd for use in computer forensics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/dc3dd.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/dc3dd-6.12.2-1.src.rpm Description: dc3dd is a patched version of GNU dd to include a number of features useful for computer forensics. Many of these features were inspired by dcfldd, but were rewritten for dc3dd. * Pattern writes. The program can write a single hexadecimal value or a text string to the output device for wiping purposes. * Piecewise and overall hashing with multiple algorithms and variable size windows. Supports MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, and SHA-512. Hashes can be computed before or after conversions are made. * Progress meter with automatic input/output file size probing * Combined log for hashes and errors * Error grouping. Produces one error message for identical sequential errors * Verify mode. Able to repeat any transformations done to the input file and compare it to an output. * Ability to split the output into chunks with numerical or alphabetic extensions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 21:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232136.n1NLaCsx019669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #9 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-23 16:36:11 EDT --- Hi Jim, yes, fixed the problems you reported for the packaging. Jan is also taking care of fixing all the python/perl/C fence agents but that's upstream job and it has been marked blocker for 3.0.0 final release. I am still not able to build in mock but Manuel did report in Comment #6 that it builds fine in koji and it did never fail in my local machines (that are pretty much bare installations) so I am farly confident that it does build :) I can't force you, but i'd like to move forward with this task. Also.. koji has been offline for maintaince for over 48 hours. Tomorrow morning I'll check if a mock fix has been stalling on infrastructure and let you know. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 21:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232138.n1NLcdXk020235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #33 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-23 16:38:38 EDT --- Looks like I was a bit too hasty. Please remove the jmf library from the original source archive. We can't distribute that, it's non-free. While you're at it, you could also remove the other binaries, since you have to repackage the source archive anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 21:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232146.n1NLkMXK018492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jim Meyering 2009-02-23 16:46:21 EDT --- ;-) no problem. koji's good enough for me. (sorry to be slow today. I'm supposed to be on PTO all this week) I flipped the fedora-review switch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 21:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232147.n1NLlUNi022245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #28 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-02-23 16:47:29 EDT --- Haven't had much time lately to work on it. Maybe in a couple of weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 21:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232149.n1NLnaFH018886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-23 16:49:35 EDT --- waf automatically does the parallel builds, it just doesn't say that it is. ;) Checked in and built. sion has been marked a dead.package and a ticket has been filed with rel-eng to block it. Closing this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 21:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232156.n1NLunSq024167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #60 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-23 16:56:43 EDT --- New packages up for review. This update disables most of Samba4, leaving only what OpenChange needs. It also addresses most of Matthias' review comments. Not sure how to deal with the Python provides issue in comment #47, but the subpackage is disabled so it's probably not worth worrying about for now. Successfully built and installed OpenChange and Evolution-MAPI against this package set. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-2.alpha6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232207.n1NM7anF026323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-23 17:07:35 EDT --- python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232210.n1NMATnN026880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Brennan Ashton 2009-02-23 17:10:28 EDT --- [X]license field matches the actual license. [x]package installs properly. [X]rpmlint is silent. rpmlint perl-SystemC-Vregs.spec ../SRPMS/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.461-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-SystemC-Vregs-1.461-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji scratch build is fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1148426 review+ Sorry for the delay it slipped my mind, I will get that other package I am holding reviewed shortly as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232207.n1NM7Vto022636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-23 17:07:30 EDT --- python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232231.n1NMVnGf030687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 --- Comment #23 from Matthew Farrellee 2009-02-23 17:31:44 EDT --- I've pruned some of the Requires for 7.2.1-1. Doing so assumes that all the dependencies do proper SO versioning, which may be a dangerous assumption. Please file new bugs instead of commenting on closed ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232232.n1NMWstW027126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #7 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-02-23 17:32:53 EDT --- Ok, I just did a scratchbuild of the latest foolscap (0.3.2), and all seems fine now. Here's the scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1148707 New version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232239.n1NMdfSE028276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-23 17:39:37 EDT --- Well, gpm-1.20.6-1.fc11 has been built in Rawhide which is newer rather the reviewed package, so closing now. Thank you, Zdenek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232246.n1NMkIFR029591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #25 from Bruno Cornec 2009-02-23 17:46:09 EDT --- Here is a very complete status made by the current maintainer of afio Koen Holtman that deserve integration into this report for completeness. Also Cf: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509287 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Acting as the upstream afio maintainer I just finished a LONG note on the license status of afio. The note includes a clarifying comment by Mark Brukhartz, the author of the original afio license text. I hope that this note will help the afio user community, by informing the user community on the somewhat complex legal status of the afio license. Cheers, Koen. Issues with the afio license text identified in 2008 ==================================================== About afio ========== Afio is a fault-tolerant archiver/backup tool for Unix systems. Afio was created in 1985 by Mark Brukhartz. Since then, many contributers and maintainers have added features and bug fixes. Afio is similar to Unix tools like tar, cpio, star, and pax. However, as a feature that these other tools lack: afio has the ability to make compressed archive files that are very fault tolerant against byte errors. This fault tolerant compression has attracted a user base that has been sufficiently large to keep afio alive as a maintained piece of software. Afio project information and link to sources: http://freshmeat.net/projects/afio/ About this note =============== In 2008, several people have raised the question if afio can be considered 'free' software by modern standards, see for example https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 http://spot.livejournal.com/303000.html http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509287 http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-legal at lists.debian.org/index.html#39478 A number of separate issues were raised in these discussions, this note tries to identify and address all of them. The answer to the question if afio is free depends partly on the definition of free. This note will not try to define the true meaning of free. The main goal of this note is to help the reader to determine if afio is 'free software' or 'open source' or 'freely distributable' by the definition chosen by the reader. To meet that goal, various valid but sometimes contradictory lines of reasoning about 'free' will be described and discussed. This note was written by Koen Holtman (the current afio maintainer) in January/February 2009, based on a review of the discussions on the web and further e-mail discussions with a number of people. In this note, the term 'FOSS' is used to refer to the broad class of free/open/etc software in general. The term 'Linux distro' is used to refer to any GNU/Linux distribution. Disclaimer: the author of this note is not a lawyer, nor does he play one on TV. Full afio license text ====================== The full afio license text (for afio 2.4.6 and later) is reproduced in this section. * afio.c * * Manipulate archives and files. * * This software was written by Mark Brukhartz at Lachman Associates, * Inc.. Additional code was written by a large cast of people. * * Licensing and (re)distribution * ------------------------------ * * THE SUMMARY INFORMATION BELOW WAS WRITTEN FOR THE BENEFIT OF * SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTORS * * Because of historical reasons, different parts of this software * package are covered by different licenses. However: * * A) This software package as a whole may be re-distributed by any * method that satisfies the conditions of both the Perl "Artistic * License" and the GNU Library General Public License. * * B) According to the theory.html file of the Sunsite Archive * Maintainers, this implies that the correct LSM template field * is: * * Copying-policy: LGPL * * C) This software package can also be re-distributed under * particular conditions that are _weaker_ than the Perl "Artistic * License" combined with the GNU Library General Public License. * Redistribution need only satisfy all four license notices below. * * Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, and neither are the Sunsite Archive * Maintainers. * * END OF SUMMARY INFORMATION * * ------------------------------------------------------------------ * * License notice 1, covering part of this software package. * * [Covers the original 1985 afio code] * * Copyright (c) 1985 Lachman Associates, Inc.. * * This software was written by Mark Brukhartz at Lachman Associates, * Inc.. It may be distributed within the following restrictions: * (1) It may not be sold at a profit. * (2) This credit and notice must remain intact. * This software may be distributed with other software by a commercial * vendor, provided that it is included at no additional charge. * * * [Note: it is believed that condition 5 of the Perl "Artistic * License" implies the intent of restriction (1) above.] * * -------- * * ** License notice 2, covering part of this software package. * * [Covers the tempnam function] * * Copyright: Copyright (c) 1989 by Monty Walls. * Not derived from licensed software. * * Permission to copy and/or distribute granted under the * following conditions: * * 1). This notice must remain intact. * 2). The author is not responsible for the consequences of use * this software, no matter how awful, even if they * arise from defects in it. * 3). Altered version must not be represented as being the * original software. * * -------- * * ** License notice 3, covering part of this software package. * * [Covers the contents of the gnu.fnmatch.tar.gz file] * * Copyright (C) 1991, 1992, 1993 Free Software Foundation, Inc. * * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the * License, or (at your option) any later version. * * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU * Library General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public * License along with this library; see the file COPYING.LIB. If * not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, * Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. * * -------- * * ** License notice 4, covering part of this software package. * * [Covers the remainder of this software package] * * Additional code was written by a large cast of people. * * All additional code may be redistributed under the conditions of * license notice 1. * * Note that the authors of the additional code retain the right to * allow for the re-distribution of their code under weaker (and less * exotic) conditions. * * -------- * * ** WARRANTY NOTICE * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR * IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED * WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. * * * [End of licensing and redistribution section] The remaining sections of this note address issues raised with this license. The most important issue is issue number 2. Issue number 1 is about the question: why bother at all? Issue 1. Why bother distributing afio if there are alternatives like tar and cpio with a standard OSI/FSF approved free license? ================================================================ - Issue 1 description The afio license is not a standard OSI/FSF approved free license, in fact it includes text written in 1985 that is widely considered to be problematic. There are several tools, with arguably better licenses, that are similar to afio, e.g. gnu tar (GPL v3) gnu cpio (GPL v3) star (CDDL+GPL, though there seem to be some disputes about license compatibility) heirloom cpio/pax (free license) pax from Keith Muller So would it not be a good thing to remove afio from a Linux distro? Removal would make a) the license situation of the distro more easy/pure while b) not removing any functions people need. - Response to issue 1 1) Utility argument The above mentioned alternatives to afio do not provide everything that afio provides, so removing it from a Linux distro would decrease the utility of the distro. Some users of the distro will miss it if it is taken out. afio has one unique feature (fault tolerant compressed archives) that all of the above lack. Also, it has several specialized options that the other tools lack, and there are deployed backup scripts that rely on these specialized options. Afio is also very mature (bug-free) and portable because of its age and user base. The user base includes power users backing up large and complex filesystems, and these power users have historically found and fixed very obscure bugs. This maturity of afio is a big advantage in a backup tool -- a written-from-scratch replacement would take a long time to be equally mature. Several FOSS backup packages support afio as an archive engine, and some were designed specifically around afio. 2) Community/historical argument Afio is a FOSS project that started in 1985 and has grown 4-fold in code size and features since. Including afio into a distro shows to potential FOSS contributers just how long such software can remain useful, and celebrates the continuity between the current Web based FOSS community with the historical UNIX/USENET news based FOSS community. Issue 2. License places limits on redistribution by some parties ================================================================ - Issue 2 description Several definitions of 'free' software include the requirement that any party should be able to re-distribute it. For example. Debian Free Software Guideline 1 (DFSG#1) states: The license of a Debian component may not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. [...] (See: http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html ) The following part of the afio license can be read to contradict this: * This software was written by Mark Brukhartz at Lachman Associates, * Inc.. It may be distributed within the following restrictions: * (1) It may not be sold at a profit. * (2) [...] * This software may be distributed with other software by a commercial * vendor, provided that it is included at no additional charge. The problem is that the last two lines of the above text do allow the 'selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution', but they ONLY allow this, when the selling is at a profit, if you are a 'commercial vendor'. So for example a private individual, who cannot be considered a commercial vendor, would be prevented by this license from burning and re-selling a CD including afio at a profit. Therefore the license restricts some parties from re-distribution, violating DFSG#1 and also DFSG#5, making afio non-free. - Response to issue 2 The above interpretation of the license text is a possible one, but it is not the only possible interpretation. If one wants to make a case for afio satisfying DFSG#1, then one has to argue that the designation 'commercial vendor' designates very broadly ANY party that is engaged in 'selling at a profit'. A private individual re-selling a CD including afio at a profit could claim to be acting as a 'commercial vendor' as far as the meaning of the license text is concerned. Is such a claim credible? I believe it is. Below are the two arguments why 'commercial vendor' covers any party selling at a profit. 1) Argument by authority of the author We managed to contact Mark Brukhartz, and after discussion of the issues he provided a statement on the meaning of the license text that he wrote. The text is: * This software was written by Mark Brukhartz at Lachman Associates, * Inc.. It may be distributed within the following restrictions: * (1) It may not be sold at a profit. * (2) [...] * This software may be distributed with other software by a commercial * vendor, provided that it is included at no additional charge. Here is the statement from Mark on this license text: It's my opinion, as the sole author of the license, that it does not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. Clause (1) allows the giving away of the software and the selling at no profit. The text 'This software may be distributed with other software by a commercial vendor, provided that it is included at no additional charge' should be read as granting the additional right to sell at profit the software as part of an aggregate distribution -- the term 'commercial vendor' was written to mean, and should be read to mean, 'any seller who aims to make a profit'. If should be pretty clear that Mark believes that the license satisfies DFSG#1 and DFSG#5. I should caution the reader that this statement by Mark does not fully resolve the interpretation issue: theoretically a judge might disagree with Mark, and a judge is allowed to have the final say. Also, Mark is not the legal owner of the license: Lachman Associates owned the copyright and therefore the license, but Lachman and its intellectual property was later sold to another company, and it is in fact not clear which company owns the copyright to Mark's code right now, see this link: http://spot.livejournal.com/303000.html Also, after Mark wrote and licensed the original code, the afio code base has grown by a factor of 4, so some other contributers (who retain ownership of the copyrights to their own code) could potentially speak up to object to Mark's opinion. Nevertheless, as Mark was the sole author of the license text in question, his opinion on the interpretation of the text does carry significant weight. 2) Argument that a broad interpretation of the meaning of 'commercial vendor' is possible and most likely If we look up 'commercial vendor' in the dictionary (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/), we find: vendor [..] 1. One that sells or vends: a street vendor; a vendor of software products on the Web. 2. [...] [...] commercial [...] [...] 3. Having profit as a chief aim [...] So it is perfectly valid to read 'commercial vendor' as broadly 'one that sells with profit as a chief aim', meaning 'anybody who sells at a profit'. It is not necessary to narrowly read 'commercial vendor' as 'a real company as opposed to a private individual'. Also speaking for the broad interpretation is the fact that the words 'it may not be sold at a profit' were used a few lines earlier in the license text. It is very plausible that the term 'commercial vendor' was used by the author as a short-hand to designate anyone doing the opposite of 'it may not be sold at a profit'. - Cautionary statement about the above two arguments It should be stressed that the above arguments about the broad interpretation of 'commercial vendor' are not 100.00% 'safe' in a legal sense. Any trained lawyer will immediately see that there is some ambiguity in the afio license text, and that this ambiguity leaves enough room for a judge to disagree with the above arguments on why 'commercial vendor' should be interpreted broadly. Therefore, anybody acting as if these arguments were true runs the risk of facing a judge who might not agree. One of the jobs of a trained lawyer is to identify such legal ambiguities and to deal with them -- by having their client stop taking the risk, or by seeking out the license owner to obtain a clarification that removes the ambiguity. Unfortunately, contacting the license owner is not really possible in the case of afio, see issue #4 below. So we are left with the following cautionary statement: even though I believe that the arguments above are very convincing, you will be taking a legal risk if you re-distribute afio. I believe it is a very small risk. I believe that, if you are a distributer even a very 'pure' version of GNU/Linux, you are already engaged in taking comparatively larger legal risks. Somewhat credible parties have stated that the Linux kernel infringes on patents that have never been licensed for general use. In most countries, any distributer of the Linux kernel therefore runs the legal risk of being sued for patent infringement. Issue 3. License does not permit modification ============================================= - Issue 3 description Debian Free Software Guideline 3 (DFSG#3) states: The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software. The afio license notices (except for notice 3 which is the LGPL) do not contain any explicit statement allowing modification, or re-distribution of modified works. So afio fails the test of DFSG#3 and cannot be called free software. - Response to issue 3 Under most versions of copyright law, the default situation is that original author has the sole right of making copies, and also the sole right of making modified copies. So the absence of an explicit statement in which the author also grants this right to others is indeed cause for concern. So we have to ask ourselves: did the copyright holders of afio in fact grant the right to modify their work to others? I believe they did, so afio does satisfy DFSG#3. I have 2 arguments why they did. 1) Argument by the contents of the license notices If we look at the 4 license notices, we see that - notice 1 contains the statement It may be distributed within the following restrictions: [...] (2) This credit and notice must remain intact. - notice 2 contains the statement Permission to copy and/or distribute granted under the following conditions: 1). This notice must remain intact. [...] - notice 3 is the LGPL, which explicitly allows modification - notice 4 refers to the conditions of notice 1. So in fact notice 1, 2, and 4 all contain the clause 'this notice must remain intact'. Such a clause can be read to imply that 'it is not a condition that the parts of this work outside of this notice remain intact'. By explicitly forbidding the modification of the notice, they license owners are implicitly allowing the modification of other parts of the work. Had they wished to forbid such modifications of the rest of the work, they would have written different license notices. 2) Argument by implied licensing Implied licensing is a legal principle by which a copyright owner can be said to have granted a license for a certain type of use implicitly, by their actions, as opposed to explicitly, by writing a clause in a license text. See for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_license http://www.iplawobserver.com/2008/09/implied-license-to-use-custom-created.html The principle of implied licensing contradicts, to some extent, the principle in international copyright law that all rights about which an author remains silent are automatically assigned to the author only, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrights#Berne_Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Literary_and_Artistic_Works There is a growing body of (US) case law supporting implied licensing. The most interesting part of case law for afio is the court opinion in Field v. Google, linked from these pages: http://www.iplawobserver.com/2006/03/googles-cache-was-fair-use-according.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_v._Google#Implied_License In this case, Field created a public web page and then objected to this web page being available in the Google cache. Google argued, among other things, that they had an implied license to make the page available via the Google cache. The court described implied license as follows: A license is a defense to a claim of copyright infringement. [...] A copyright owner may grant a nonexclusive license expressly or impliedly through conduct. [...] An implied license can be found where the copyright holder engages in conduct from which [the] other [party] may properly infer that the owner consents to his use. [...] Consent to use the copyrighted work need not be manifested verbally and may be inferred based on silence where the copyright holder knows of the use and encourages it. The court found it significant that Field knew in advance that Google would be caching his page unless he took some actions in labeling his web site to prevent it, and that he chose not to take those actions -- Field remained silent thereby granting implied license. If we look at the case of afio, we can build an argument for the granting of implied license as follows. A. Mark Brukhartz, an employee of the license holder at the time, posted the afio source code, including an explicit license statement, to comp.sources.unix in 1987. Link: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sources.unix/browse_thread/thread/ce3312137ad92a37/ec49f37f3e59a267?lnk=gst&q=afio#ec49f37f3e59a267 B. The explicit license text was silent on limiting the right to modify the code. To show that there was an implicit license of to modify the code, we have to show that modification was one of the uses that the license holder could have expected after posting the code to comp.sources.unix. C. The comp.sources community was an early FOSS community, and people extending other people's code was one of the things that could be expected in that community. Indeed the creation of such extensions happened almost immediately in the case of afio -- see D. and E. below. D. The above newsgroup archive link shows that after Mark submitted the sources of afio to the newsgroup, Rich Salz, the moderator of the newsgroup, added a Makefile to the sources before forwarding them to the group, thereby in fact distributing a modified version of afio. It was common practice for Rich Salz to add a Makefile when submitted sources did not have them; the license holder would probably have known this -- and took no steps to forbid it. E. Mark did not explicitly object when modifications to afio were posted. For example, three days after the afio post to comp.sources.unix, Karl Denniger posted an improvement for afio to comp.sources.d (an unmoderated companion newsgroup to comp.sources.unix), with the description: These are context diffs to the 'afio' program, a cpio replacement, that was posted recently. The changes here take care of what I saw as a possible 1gaffe in the '-y' and '-Y' options. Link: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sources.d/browse_thread/thread/381df257b583954e F. The license holder knew that it was common practice to modify code posted to comp.sources.unix. To illustrate that Lachman Associates would have been well aware of the practice of extending software tools in the context of the comp.sources newsgroups: in 1989, two Lachman employees greatly extended a terminal emulator program written by someone else in 1986, and posted their extended version to comp.sources.atari.st, see: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sources.atari.st/msg/95d006760c056af1 Given all of the above, it can be argued that the actions of Mark (while he identified himself as working for the license owner Lachman Associates) constituted the granting of an implied license to modify afio. The current version of afio contains many contributions by other people than Mark, and these contributors typically did not add any license texts of their own. For these contributions, similar arguments for the granting of implied license to modify can be made. Note that the principle of implied licensing has been developed mostly through recent US case law; as far as I know it is still absent from international treaties. So in some locations, invoking this principle will be legally more risky than in other locations. A trained legal person would prefer to avoid a reliance on implied licensing whenever possible. Issue 4. Afio should be re-licensed under a better license ========================================================== - Issue 4 description Various software packages which had problematic licenses have now been re-licensed under better licenses. Often they have been re-licensed under OSI/FSF approved licenses. The same should be done with afio. - Response to issue 4 It would be nice if re-licensing of afio were possible, but it is not possible in practice. Afio, in the current 2.5 version, is not the in-house product of a single company. In the 22 years since Mark Brukhartz posted afio to comp.sources.unix, the FOSS community has added many features which have made the package grow by a factor of 4. Several authors have contributed major pieces of code to afio, and many more contributers (an estimated 40-100 people) provided patches, ideas, and example scripts. The afio sources do not contain complete log files containing the names of all contributers, so contacting all of them, which would be required by copyright law in order to re-license afio, is a virtually impossible task. Furthermore, as mentioned above, Mark Brukhartz is not the owner of the copyright of the original afio code, Lachman Associates owned this copyright, and it is unclear which company owns it now (see http://spot.livejournal.com/303000.html). That company would have to be identified and would have to be willing to re-license. As an alternative to re-licensing ALL afio code, it would be possible to try to find a subset of the contributers and ask them to re-license their own contributed code. Depending on the success in finding the contributers, this could (according an the estimate of the current maintainer) bring about 30-60% of the afio code base under a new license. However, but such an action would not satisfy those seeking legal clarity on the status of afio as a whole. Some software projects have managed to improve their license situation by re-writing from scratch those parts of the code that had questionable or unknown licenses. However, for afio this would mean rewriting 30-70% of the code. Any such re-write would introduce a lot of new bugs, which is not desirable in a mature backup tool. Issue 5. What about the Copying-policy: LGPL thing in the license text? ======================================================================= - Issue 5 description The license text includes at the start a summary * THE SUMMARY INFORMATION BELOW WAS WRITTEN FOR THE BENEFIT OF * SOFTWARE DISTRIBUTORS and this summary text explains how * Copying-policy: LGPL is the right LSM template value for afio. The writing of this summary information has been interpreted by some sources as an attempt to re-license afio under the LGPL, see e.g. http://spot.livejournal.com/303000.html. So one might ask: is this summary information an attempt a re-licensing, and if not, why is it there? - Response to issue 5 (Response written by Koen Holtman, author of the SUMMARY INFORMATION in question, partly based on personal recollections) The summary information is definitely not an attempt at relicensing. A close reading should make this clear. The summary information was added to afio in November 1999, it was prompted by the fact that the sunsite/ibiblio/metalab FTP site robots at that time stopped accepting random strings Copying-policy field of the .lsm file. (.lsm is a metadata file format for describing FOSS software packages on FTP sites) The FTP site robots only accepted certain fixed strings like 'LGPL'. See the following web page: http://web.archive.org/web/20001117112300/http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/LICENSES/theory.html The LGPL label was chosen by Koen Holtman among the possible fixed strings based on the contents of the web page above. Note that the Perl Artistic license referred to at the time was the 'original' Perl artistic license of 1997 which contains the following text: You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this Package. You may not charge a fee for this Package itself. Several people have since argued that part of the Artistic license text has problems, and a new version of the Artistic license (v2.0) was written that excludes this text. In an interesting twist, the site freshmeat.net at one point seems to have imported the computer-readable .lsm file of afio, using the Copying-policy line to create a 'license' line on the web site: [License] OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) (see http://web.archive.org/web/20070930211041/http://freshmeat.net/projects/afio/ ) So the interaction between the sunsite and freshmeat automatic robots seems to have effectively 'laundered' the complex license status of afio. Then, the FSF seems to have copied the data from Freshmeat: http://web.archive.org/web/20080109010049/http://directory.fsf.org/project/afio/ Both these directories have since been corrected. Issue 6. Several people working for/with FOSS related organizations have called afio not-free. ======================================================= - Issue 6 description In his blog post at http://spot.livejournal.com/303000.html , Tom Callaway, who works on Fedora legal issues, quoted the 1985 part of the afio license and wrote: Now, this license isn't free. Tom then goes on point out that the main problem with the license is with the 'It may not be sold at a profit.' clause, i.e. issue 2 above. At https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037, similar conclusions are drawn, and the issue of including afio in Fedora is closed as 'cannot fix'. In response to issues raised by Tom Callaway, the FSF reviewed the afio license and removed afio from it's Free Software directory. (See a note by Brett Smith in the comment track at http://spot.livejournal.com/303000.html.) This removal means that the FSF determined that the afio license is non-free by FSF standards. So it seems like expert opinion is going against the idea that afio is free. - Response to issue 6 Are the experts above wrong? I believe that they have made no logical errors in their reasoning -- it looks like they correctly applied a set of rules to determine freeness. So if we are to make a case for afio being 'free' by some definitions, we are down to examining the rules that were applied, and showing that at least one of them is not included in all possible definitions of 'free'. In the discussions in the links above, we find that the people involved, in so far as they explain their reasoning, are referring to the same definitions of 'free' I have used in this note, e.g. Debian Free Software Guideline #1. However, the conclusions about freeness drawn are generally more negative than my conclusions in this note. Why? I believe that the people in the links above are all using the following rule when applying guidelines for freeness: worst-case-rule: If the license text is ambiguous, in a way that would leave enough room for a judge to disagree that the license meets our written definition of 'free', then the license should be treated as non-free. In my own analysis of the legal issues above, I have avoided applying this worst-case-rule by default. I have however tried to identify all possible places where this worst-case-rule could be applied. It is very common for trained lawyers to apply this worst-case-rule, to go by the worst possible interpretation of an ambiguous legal text. In fact, in a multidisciplinary business team, one of the key skills that a lawyer is expected to bring to the table is the skill to find the legal ambiguities and worst-cases. In the FOSS context, the worst-case-rule has often been used when a large company (e.g. Netscape, Sun, Microsoft) created a specialized license to go with a specific piece of software that the company wanted to share with or contribute to the FOSS community. Arguably, it is a good strategy in such a case for the FOSS community to assume the worst possible interpretation of the license text concerned. The use of the worst-case-rule has sometimes led to companies improving their license texts from a FOSS community point of view. However, I would argue that applying this worst-case-rule to afio, a historical product of the FOSS community for which the license text cannot be changed anymore, is like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. There is no need to treat afio as if it might be a carefully constructed Trojan horse. So I feel that applying the worst-case-rule is fine in come cases, but destructive in others. Does this mean that I am arguing for a double standard as far as the legal analysis of FOSS licenses is concerned? I am not -- in the end, a legal analysis is a determination of the risk of getting sued and of losing in court when one is sued. This risk cannot be determined correctly by doing a narrow analysis of the license text under the worst-case assumption that the other party is out to get you. Other factors, like those considered for afio in this note, should also play a role in legal risk determination. I believe that a strict application of the worst-case-rule, when judging a software package against e.g. the Debian Free Software Guidelines or the four kinds of software freedoms defined by the FSF, will lead to results that are counter-productive for the FOSS community: - The worst-case-rule will lead to a favoring of software packages released in one go by a single company over almost all software packages that were grown over many years by volunteer contributors using the Internet. Most volunteer software will look worse through the lens of the worst-case-rule, because of the way copyright law works. In a worst-case legal analysis, copyright law requires that all volunteer contributers have made explicit statements placing their contributions under a free license. If one such statement is missing, then there exists an ambiguity in that author's wishers, that has to be interpreted by the worst-case-rule as a lack of permission to copy or modify. - Living with the worst-case-rule in a FOSS project will raise barriers of entry for contributers to FOSS projects, because these contributers would have to be asked to make legal statements licensing their contributions, instead of relying on the principle of implicit license. - The worst-case-rule will favor software projects that were started recently over some longer-running software projects, because only the recent projects could start with license texts that have been constructed to be unambiguous according to the most recent legal insights. In conclusion, I believe that the reason why the experts in the links above found afio to be non-free is that they all implicitly or explicitly applied the worst-case-rule. I do not want to argue that the worst-case-rule should never be applied. In fact, a Linux distro based on the strict application of the worst-case-rule could be considered valuable by some, and some distributions that are looking to be '100% free' seem to be applying this rule. Note that '100% free' according to the worst-case-rule does not mean '100% elimination of all legal risks to the user'. No Linux distro can be 100% pure in this way: the kernel alone comes with patent risks. I believe that the worst-case-rule should not be used by more general Linux distros, unless it is combined with a moderating principle. Without a moderating principle, the worst-case-rule has negative effects on the community aspects of FOSS. Conclusion ========== This note has addressed several questions that have been raised on the status of afio as 'free' software. The best argument for afio being 'non-free' is that the afio license text that was written in 1985 fails the test of the worst-case-rule: the text is ambiguous in a way that would leave enough room for a judge to disagree that the license meets e.g. Debian Free Software Guideline 1. The best argument for afio being 'free' is that the worst-case rule should not be applied in the case of afio, because it is the product of a long-running FOSS effort, and because the ambiguities in the 1985 license text, when examined in context, do not create any practical barriers against exercising the freedoms that a modern FOSS user or distributer expects to have. I believe that legally speaking, if a user, programmer, or distributer treats afio as 'free' software, the risk of having a court conclude that they are in violation of the afio license is very low, low enough to be lost in the background noise. It is not always morally right to treat copyrighted works in a 'free' way, just because the legal risks of doing so are low. But in the case of afio I believe treating it as 'free' it is definitely morally right, because this what the authors intended. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I chose to post this note as I feel in agreement with Koen's perception, his will to help old but still useful software to stay around as a gift, and my personal will to consider it as free for the MondoRescue project that is currently using it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 22:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232254.n1NMsHes002236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 --- Comment #3 from Brennan Ashton 2009-02-23 17:54:15 EDT --- [X]source files match upstream: 56d569e0258e6777f47c85410de58dbb ../SOURCES/Verilog-Readmem-0.02.tar.gz 56d569e0258e6777f47c85410de58dbb Verilog-Readmem-0.02.tar.gz [x]package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [x]specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [x]dist tag is present. [x]license field matches the actual license. [x]license is open source-compatible. GPL+ or Artistic [FAIL]latest version is being packaged. There is now 0.04 [x]BuildRequires are proper. [x]compiler flags are appropriate. [x]%clean is present. [x]package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1148876 [x]package installs properly. [?]rpmlint is silent. rpmlint perl-Verilog-Readmem.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl-Verilog-Readmem.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02/examples/ex1 perl-Verilog-Readmem.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02/examples/ex2 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. That is your call. [x]final provides and requires are sane: rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Verilog::Readmem) = 0.02 perl-Verilog-Readmem = 0.02-1.fc10 rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.02-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 [x]%check is present and all tests pass: [x]owns the directories it creates. [x]doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [x]no duplicates in %files. [?]file permissions are appropriate. see rpmlint [x]no scriptlets present. [x]code, not content. [x]documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [x]%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [x]no headers. [x]no pkgconfig files. Consider upgrading to 0.04 and also confirm you want the example files like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232316.n1NNGkt3003441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Adam Miller 2009-02-23 18:16:45 EDT --- The project I was packaging this up for has been shut down. Closing Review Request, thank you for your time during the review. Very sorry for consuming unnecessary amounts of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232321.n1NNLRP3007656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-23 18:21:26 EDT --- Is the line encodings fixing not better be done in the %prep section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232318.n1NNIEOR006767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-23 18:18:13 EDT --- - '%{!?python_sitelib: ...' is not needed at the top of the spec file. - Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pyquante/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > >> PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > > >> /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Minimizers.py 0644 > > > > > >You can add something like 'find *.py -type f | xargs chmod a+x' to fix this. > > > > If I do that then I get script-without-shebang errors. > > Besides, the files in site-packages don't need to be executable, since they > > just contain modules used by the frontend software. > > > > Check your python-sitelib directory, only a small minority of the .py files are > > executable. rpmlint shouldn't complain about this. Will upstream fix this? If the modules only are used by the frontend then the shebang can be removed (and then the rpmlint errors will disappear, I guess) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232319.n1NNJPet003718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-23 18:19:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SystemC-Vregs Short Description: Utility routines used by vregs Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 Owner: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487067] New: Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487067 Summary: Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/autopsy.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/autopsy-2.21-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Autopsy Forensic Browser is a graphical interface to utilities found in The Sleuth Kit (TSK). TSK is a collection of command line tools that allow you to investigate a Windows or Unix system by examining the hard disk contents. TSK and Autopsy will show you the files, data units, and metadata of NTFS, FAT, EXTxFS, and UFS file system images in a read-only environment. Autopsy allows you to search for specific types of evidence based on keywords, MAC times, hash values, and file types. Autopsy is HTML-based and uses a client-server model. The Autopsy server runs on many UNIX systems and the client can be any platform with an HTML browser. This enables one to create a flexible environment with a central Autopsy server and several remote clients. For incident response scenarios, a CD with The Sleuth Kit and Autopsy can be created to allow the responder read-only remote access to a live suspect system from an HTML-browser on a trusted system. Refer to the README-live.txt file for more details. Autopsy will not modify the original images and the integrity of the images can be verified in Autopsy using MD5 values. There are help pages for the main analysis modes and The Sleuth Kit Informer is a newsletter that adds additional documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232349.n1NNnS7E009279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-23 18:49:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332991) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332991) Possible icon for gpscorrelate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232353.n1NNr8Js013519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 23 23:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902232352.n1NNqdXU013325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-23 18:52:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Is there a reason why RELEASES and README are not included in %doc? Beside the > > %doc stuff I see no further blocker, package APPROVED. > > I agree that the file RELEASES should be included, but the file README only > includes installation information, that do not help Fedora users. Sorry, I missed that. > > The usage of 'redhat-starthere' is a bit problematic but I guess that if the > > icon is missing there is no icon showing up in menu. Let's wait for the icon > > from the ArtTeam. > > So should I just use the redhat-starthere icon in the .desktop but not add a > dependency to fedora-icon-theme? In Comment #12 is a self-made icon (based on stuff in /usr/share/pixmaps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 01:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240117.n1O1Hk8O024235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #15 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-23 20:17:45 EDT --- Fixed SPEC: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement.spec Fixed SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.5.20090217svn.fc10.src.rpm Fixed the licensing line, removed dupe R a, fixed P/O for subpackages and got a better summary/description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 01:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487080] New: Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 Summary: Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/jocaml.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/jocaml-3.11.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: JoCaml is a extension of Objective Caml for concurrent and distributed programming, based upon the join-calculus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 01:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240140.n1O1eYm6027931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #50 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-02-23 20:40:29 EDT --- here's an update to match the latest guidelines proposal, using cabal2spec 0.7 SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-1.4.5-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 01:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240143.n1O1hswU031851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-23 20:43:53 EDT --- Packager notes: - see http://yquem.inria.fr/pipermail/jocaml-list/2009-February/000105.html for packaging discussions with upstream - using standard find-provides/find-requires rather than Ocaml's, because the latter outputs internal modules that mostly duplicate Ocaml's, which could potentially mean that installing an Ocaml library would pull in Jocaml instead of Ocaml. - This JoCaml is configured with a companion Ocaml, meaning it fallbacks to using the Ocaml-provided library if a particular JoCaml library is not present. Thus most of the standard library have been stripped out (again, to avoid dependency confusion). Because JoCaml skips from 3.10.0 to 3.11.0, that means this package has to be tested using Rawhide's Ocaml. - This is tested with the JoCaml ray tracer: http://jocaml.inria.fr/pub/joex/JoCamlsRUs.tar.gz Upstream promises to provide a test suite that can be used to verify that our stripped JoCaml is still functional; will test against it when it arrives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240506.n1O56Qh1032494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:06:25 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240504.n1O54Kl5031879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:04:19 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240513.n1O5Du2c004349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:13:55 EDT --- python-weberror-0.10.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-weberror-0.10.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240513.n1O5Doxh001058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:13:48 EDT --- python-weberror-0.10.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-weberror-0.10.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240515.n1O5FKRQ001557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Luke Macken 2009-02-24 00:15:19 EDT --- Tagged, built, and submitted for F-10 and F-9 updates. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240521.n1O5LgsB005772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #1 from David A. Wheeler 2009-02-24 00:21:40 EDT --- Sorry, here's an updated spec/SRPM pair: Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/divine-mc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/divine-mc-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm This program doesn't build on ppc64, but the previous specification accidentally omitted the required ExcludeArch. This revision 2 adds the ExcludeArch (I had trouble accessing Koji earlier, or I would've found this earlier.) Clean bill of health building on Koji; as noted at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1151799 1151799 build (dist-f10, divine-mc-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 4 done 0 failed rpmlint gives a clean bill of health, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240524.n1O5OEs2005983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:24:14 EDT --- python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240524.n1O5OA5h002672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 00:24:09 EDT --- python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487094] New: Review Request: stp - Constraint solver/decision procedure Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stp - Constraint solver/decision procedure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487094 Summary: Review Request: stp - Constraint solver/decision procedure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwheeler at dwheeler.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/stp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/stp-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: STP (Simple Theorem Prover) is a constraint solver (also referred to as a decision procedure or automated prover) aimed at solving constraints generated by program analysis tools, theorem provers, automated bug finders, intelligent fuzzers and model checkers. STP has been used in many research projects at Stanford, Berkeley, MIT, CMU and other universities, as well as companies and government agencies. The input to STP are formulas over the theory of bit-vectors and arrays (This theory captures most expressions from languages like C/C++/Java and Verilog), and the output of STP is a single bit of information that indicates whether the formula is satisfiable or not. If the input is satisfiable, then it also generates a variable assignment to satisfy the input formula. Additional information can be found at: http://people.csail.mit.edu/vganesh/STP_files/stp.html Koji builds okay: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1151367 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed rpmlint is happy too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240550.n1O5oGpe009898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet 2009-02-24 00:50:14 EDT --- + Requires php-pear(PEAR) + Provides php-pear(Crypt_Blowfish) = 1.1.0 php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish = 1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240550.n1O5oV38006907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 --- Comment #12 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-24 00:50:30 EDT --- Jim, thanks for the review and enjoy your PTO! Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 05:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240549.n1O5ngQF006426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-24 00:49:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fence-agents Short Description: Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster Owners: fabbione Branches: devel InitialCC: fabbione -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 06:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240642.n1O6g3kP015142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #13 from John Guthrie 2009-02-24 01:42:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Sorry, $DAYJOB exploded on me for a couple of weeks there. :) No problem. I suppose that it's good that $DAYJOB != "". ;-) > It's more elegant to BuildRequire the demo package and move the file where you > need it (+ change package, whatever), but I don't think it would be wrong to > just include the file itself as a separate Source: file in the SRPM. Whichever > you prefer, I'd say. That's what I was thinking. I didn't know if there was any downside though. Here is the new SRPM URL with the new BuildRequire: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/simplyhtml-0.12.5-4.fc10.src.rpm The Spec file URL is still the same, but updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:01:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240701.n1O71DiX018334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-24 02:01:12 EDT --- Thx. Done : http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-ConsoleTools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] New: Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Summary: Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramez.hanna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://informatiq.org/files/reviewboard.spec SRPM URL: http://informatiq.org/files/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: I just packaged ReviewBoard, I'm fairly new in packaging and would appreciate a review of them it was announced on the fedora-infrastructure mailing list that it is needed, so here it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 07:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487098] New: Review Request: Djblets - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Djblets - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Summary: Review Request: Djblets - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramez.hanna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://informatiq.org/files/djblets.spec SRPM URL: http://informatiq.org/files/Djblets-0.5alpha3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: I earlier submitted ReviewBoard for review, Djblet is a dependency of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 08:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240833.n1O8XZXN004354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-24 03:33:33 EDT --- md5sum is cc3b56373ba2d380b19d9142e4173ec7 for both tar.gz package build cleanly APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 08:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240835.n1O8ZrXx004879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #34 from D Haley 2009-02-24 03:35:51 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-11.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1154545 rpmlint: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/flexdock-0.5.1-11.fc10.i386.rpm flexdock.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. >Please remove the jmf library from the original source archive Done. > you could also remove the other binaries Done. The JMF has the nice side effect of reducing size of package. ;) >Very nice, however... the %changelog entry you've just added contains an empty >line: Removed. >Thanks for bearing with me. Whatever makes for good packages is a good thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 08:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:35:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240835.n1O8Zt4O001889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-02-24 03:35:54 EDT --- Looks good. Just one tiny rpmlint warning from the SRPM: simplyhtml.src: W: strange-permission simplyhtml.sh 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Since you have the %attr line in the %files section, I don't think that the source file needs any special permissions itself. This is APPROVED (but please change the permissions on that one source file before importing, just for neatness. :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 08:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240843.n1O8hhjD003078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-02-24 03:43:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish Short Description: Quick two-way blowfish encryption Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 08:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240856.n1O8ufGW008480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-24 03:56:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Just a brief look: > 1. Don't forget to fix the version number in your changelog section. Currently > it doesn't match with the version of the package itself. Good catch, will do. > 2. I don't know why, but it doesn't run on my system (with an Intel graphic > card!) and crashes with a segmentation fault :( This is probably not an error of this packages, since it's basically just a game data. What release of Fedora and blender package did you use? Are you able to launch/use blender? I'm wondering if the upstream binary version of the game engine runs for you? Would you mind trying to download the binary distribution from http://www.yofrankie.org/download/ [1] and trying it? http://download.blender.org/apricot/yofrankie_bge.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240917.n1O9H2VV010524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-24 04:16:58 EDT --- Your explicit Requires are version-less. They are no better than the automatic SONAME deps. They are fragile even, since they would break if a library were moved to another package or if a package were renamed. The point of adding the comment here is to make the reviewer aware of this, too, as this ought to have caught during the review. > Doing so assumes that all the dependencies do proper SO versioning, > which may be a dangerous assumption. It doesn't take much to verify that the SONAMEs include major versions. Multiple libraries using the same SONAME would be a bad conflict in the package collection [unless it's a special-case of alternative installations that is being treated appropriately]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240918.n1O9IWNY013662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 04:18:30 EDT --- mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:18:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240918.n1O9ItQg013745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-24 04:18:53 EDT --- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240918.n1O9IKmw010758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 04:18:18 EDT --- mingw32-nsis-2.43-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-nsis-2.43-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240919.n1O9J40P010898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240919.n1O9J5Nh010928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Bug 467385 depends on bug 467384, which changed state. Bug 467384 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 09:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483620] Review Request: libbind - ISC's standard resolver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902240928.n1O9STxH013291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483620 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-02-24 04:28:28 EDT --- few final notes: - the bind-libbind* Provides/Obsoletes can be completely removed, because bind-libbind was present only in F <= 7. - the bind-libs/bind-devel Obsolete should be removed too, because you are only moving one library into a separate package - freeciv, milter-greylist and dnscap should require an update of BuildRequires after importing libbind -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241010.n1OAAH6r025956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241011.n1OABKmo026266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-24 05:11:19 EDT --- Copy of an email I sent on this subject to Michel ----------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:50:05AM -0500, Michel Salim wrote: > Almost ready with the review request, but there are some things I need > to resolve regarding OCaml find-provides and find-requires first: > > http://yquem.inria.fr/pipermail/jocaml-list/2009-February/000107.html > > - JoCaml provides an almost-identical set of base libraries to OCaml, > and so if I use ocaml-find-provides.sh and ocaml-find-requires.sh, it > might erroneously cause JoCaml to be pulled in when a user installs an > add-on OCaml library on a system without an installed ocaml. The situation sounds similar to the OCaml cross-compiler that we ship here: http://homes.merjis.com/~rich/mingw/fedora-rawhide/x86_64/RPMS/ http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/ocaml In that case the solution is to (a) have a separate library directory and (b) have a modified ocaml-find-provides/ocaml-find-requires which uses the alternate library directory and makes "ocaml(jocaml,Module) = HASH" dependencies. Step (b) is not actually implemented right now. In the case of the cross-compiler, we choose between them using findlib and an environment variable: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-ocaml-maint at lists.debian.org/msg20208.html > - When asking upstream about the modules that have different hashes, > it was revealed that some of the dependencies discovered by > ocaml-find-provides.sh might be internal modules, rather than exported > libraries. I'm attaching the diff between the sorted lists provided by > ocaml and jocaml: Yes, the scripts are a bit hit-and-miss, because the program we use (ocamlobjinfo) doesn't quite have the necessary output to do dependency analysis properly. To get around this we hard-code a few modules to ignore, and generally it works well, but possibly there are still a few bugs in this area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487114] New: Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Summary: Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: capel at stone-it.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec SRPM URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: gvrpcd implements end-node GVRP functionality as a user-space daemon. It generates periodically GVRP "JOIN" packets with information about VLANs that server has defined on given NIC, or more generically - that it wants to be able to connect to. The patch contains a small Makefile modification, a sysconfig-file for specifying the interface it operates on, and an init-script. I've sent this patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241028.n1OASQOl027039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Jasper Capel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241027.n1OARf7x026918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Jasper Capel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487115] New: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk Alias: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch/perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.4-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package provides throttled email notification for Spacewalk. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1155887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241057.n1OAvSKi001548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 10:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241057.n1OAvGLQ001504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241115.n1OBFv0C009664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241118.n1OBIrTP010497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:17:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241117.n1OBHhH5007295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 06:17:41 EDT --- cvs admin done BTW no need to initcc yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241117.n1OBHQVU007217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 06:17:25 EDT --- cvs done But in future please include the main review conversation in bugzilla so there is some record of the review proper preserved for others to see: this is important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241124.n1OBO9YY011899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-24 06:24:07 EDT --- Any progress on this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241122.n1OBM6B5011542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-24 06:22:04 EDT --- I will look on this today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 11:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241146.n1OBkECv015008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-24 06:46:13 EDT --- Okay, I've removed the shebangs, and the package still works. rpmlint output is now clean. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241208.n1OC8RTe023202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 07:08:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cabal2spec Short Description: RPM packaging tool for Haskell Cabal Packages Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241209.n1OC9RMF020728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cabal2spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241228.n1OCSJZu025819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-24 07:28:18 EDT --- I've got no response from my email about vala packaging guidelines to fedora-devel so not quite sure where to take it from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241232.n1OCWlDf027309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-24 07:32:46 EDT --- + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1156435 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9d8f4c2e724f67e66317f06efaa53e03 for both Test-JSON-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. not tested - package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. N/A no headers or static libraries. N/A no .pc file present. N/A no -devel subpackage N/A no .la files. N/A no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave t/00-load.........# Testing Test::JSON 0.06, Perl 5.010000, /usr/bin/perl ok t/10testjson......ok t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=39, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.21 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.29 CPU) Result: PASS + Package perl-Test-JSON: Provides: perl(Test::JSON) = 0.06 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(JSON::Any) perl(Test::Builder) perl(Test::Differences) perl(strict) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481731] Review Request: resource-agents - Open Source HA Resource Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241254.n1OCsV7x002612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481731 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-24 07:54:30 EDT --- 1157024 build (dist-f11, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/resource-agents/devel:resource-agents-3_0_0-4_alpha5_fc11) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241252.n1OCqjx2002339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 07:52:43 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff output looks good. You might want to replace %define by %global eventually to keep up with the latest fedora packaging recommendations. (cabal2spec-0.7 does that.) Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1156937 rpmlint output: ghc-haskell-src-exts.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8/libHShaskell-src-exts-0.4.8.a ghc-haskell-src-exts-doc.i386: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-haskell-src-exts ghc-haskell-src-exts-prof.i386: W: no-documentation ghc-haskell-src-exts-prof.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8/libHShaskell-src-exts-0.4.8_p.a Probably good to fix the error above. cpphs is needed by ghc-haskell-src-exts.i386? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 12:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481751] Review Request: fence-agents - Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241255.n1OCtGxN000617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481751 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-02-24 07:55:15 EDT --- 1157018 build (dist-f11, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/fence-agents/devel:fence-agents-3_0_0-4_alpha5_fc11) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 13:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241314.n1ODEVUY007720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 08:14:30 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. modulo above rpmlint description error [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. BSD 3 Clause without advertising [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. a8bbb3de67480cfd2e3c4d7ad553a11d /home/petersen/tmp/haskell-src-exts-0.4.8.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [waived for haskell] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora, but consider/take care of the above point/question. Thank you for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 13:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487128] New: Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers Alias: eventReceivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487128 Summary: Review Request: eventReceivers - Command Center Event Receivers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/eventReceivers/eventReceivers.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/eventReceivers/eventReceivers-2.20.11-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package contains handler, which receive events from scouts. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1157330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 13:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241327.n1ODRSit011316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-24 08:27:27 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 01911cb8fa06595d221f073c3c06d1b6f1b901a5 perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.4.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 14:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456783] Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241415.n1OEFNVl022322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456783 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnomeuser at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from David Nielsen 2009-02-24 09:15:22 EDT --- Are you still interested in this package? I ask because I have submitted the same one but I see yours predates mine. I will be happy to review your work if you still want to maintain this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 14:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241427.n1OERn06025523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 14:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241450.n1OEoEKS001284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 14:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241451.n1OEpdpr032039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Sumit Bose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 15:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241503.n1OF3Iw8002729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Josh Boyer 2009-02-24 10:03:17 EDT --- Review: source files match upstream: [jwboyer at yoda SOURCES]$ sha256sum ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 c44a84da3cf37ecc69b36f6079a814e680cf37c74cb7d55f457635adb8209351 ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 [jwboyer at yoda ~]$ wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/geoff/cell/ps3-utils/ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 [jwboyer at yoda ~]$ sha256sum ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 c44a84da3cf37ecc69b36f6079a814e680cf37c74cb7d55f457635adb8209351 ps3-utils-2.3.tar.bz2 package meets naming and versioning guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. GPLv2 license text included in package. latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. compiler flags are appropriate. %clean is present. package builds in mock. package installs properly. debuginfo package looks complete. rpmlint is silent. [jwboyer at yoda ~]$ rpmlint -i ps3-utils.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jwboyer at yoda ~]$ rpmlint -i ps3-utils-2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. I consider this APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 15:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487148] New: Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Summary: Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Gearman provides a generic framework to farm out work to other machines or dispatch function calls to machines that are better suited to do the work. It allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport for database replication. In other words, it is the nervous system for how distributed processing communicates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 15:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241514.n1OFEHfw008868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-24 10:14:15 EDT --- Still no go :( [root at pc64 ~]# reviewtool status Retrieving status from bugzilla.... What's your bugzilla login email addy? [nobody at fedoraproject.org] wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Thanks, wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro. You can set this permanently by running setup. Please enter your bugzilla password: *********** 1 bugs found. Fetching bugzilla data: 0% [ ]Attribute(reporter) does not pass the type constraint (Fedora::Bugzilla::Types::EmailAddress) with undef at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool/Command/status.pm line 97 Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa0668ec)', 'HASH(0x89538dc)', 'ARRAY(0x8aa3034)') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 360 App::Cmd::execute_command('Fedora::App::ReviewTool=HASH(0x89f68e4)', 'Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa0668ec)', 'HASH(0x89538dc)') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 256 App::Cmd::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool') called at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 32 quote from tail /var/log/yum.log Feb 19 20:45:05 Installed: perl-MooseX-MultiInitArg-0.01-2.fc10.noarch Feb 19 20:45:05 Updated: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch Feb 19 20:45:05 Updated: reviewtool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch [root at pc64 ~]# rpm -qa \*Bugz\* perl-Fedora-Bugzilla-0.04-1.fc10.noarch [root at pc64 ~]# yum update perl* Setting up Update Process Examining perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-2.fc10.noarch.rpm: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-2.fc10.noarch Package perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool not installed, cannot update it. Run yum install to install it instead. Examining perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch.rpm: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.04-3.fc11.noarch Package perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool not installed, cannot update it. Run yum install to install it instead. No Packages marked for Update should I try in rawhide ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 15:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241520.n1OFKFSc008444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-24 10:20:13 EDT --- scratch the yum update perl* from above, I've done it correctly now. but the behaviour is the same and it does not matter if I use the correct password or not, I have the exact same output... [root at pc64 ~]# reviewtool status Retrieving status from bugzilla.... What's your bugzilla login email addy? [nobody at fedoraproject.org] wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Thanks, wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro. You can set this permanently by running setup. Please enter your bugzilla password: *********** <-------- WRONG PASSWORD HERE 1 bugs found. Fetching bugzilla data: 0% [ ]Attribute(reporter) does not pass the type constraint (Fedora::Bugzilla::Types::EmailAddress) with undef at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Fedora/App/ReviewTool/Command/status.pm line 97 Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa2952d4)', 'HASH(0x8b788ac)', 'ARRAY(0x8cc806c)') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 360 App::Cmd::execute_command('Fedora::App::ReviewTool=HASH(0x8c22bb4)', 'Fedora::App::ReviewTool::Command::status=HASH(0xa2952d4)', 'HASH(0x8b788ac)') called at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/App/Cmd.pm line 256 App::Cmd::run('Fedora::App::ReviewTool') called at /usr/bin/reviewtool line 32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 15:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241543.n1OFhtkP015460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-02-24 10:43:54 EDT --- + Final Requires OK /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6 + Final Provides OK php-pear(components.ez.no/ConsoleTools) = 1.5 php-ezc-ConsoleTools = 1.5-1.fc8 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 15:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241554.n1OFsxdl019620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-24 10:54:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ConsoleTools Short Description: A set of classes to do different actions with the console Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241600.n1OG0K9h020104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-24 11:00:18 EDT --- Thanks for the update. Package fails to build under mock for rawhide (gcc 4.4). Mainly because of gcc headers cleanup some headers now are not included by default or indirectly through some other headers. please consider the following patch: --- slim-2.6.1b/include/slim.h 2008-11-07 00:46:47.000000000 +0200 +++ slim-2.6.1b-mod/include/slim.h 2009-02-24 15:22:57.000000000 +0200 @@ -8,9 +8,11 @@ #define SLIM_H #include +#include #include #include #include // for strlen, strcpy +#include #define SLIM_VERSION "v2_6_0" --- slim-2.6.1b/src/slim_control.cpp 2008-11-07 00:46:48.000000000 +0200 +++ slim-2.6.1b-mod/src/slim_control.cpp 2009-02-24 15:51:01.000000000 +0200 @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ // Normally, this means stripping any trailing dot-suffix. // But if we have --preserve, then append a ".raw" suffix instead. char *rawname; - char *last_suffix = strrchr(compname,'.'); + const char *last_suffix = strrchr(compname,'.'); size_t baselen; if (last_suffix) baselen = (last_suffix-compname); it would be nice to send it upstream too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241614.n1OGE3jt024786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241613.n1OGDcpD024726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet 2009-02-24 11:13:36 EDT --- Why do you use install modules/%{peclName}.so %{buildroot}%{php_extdir} Rather than (which also create the destination dir) make install INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Doesn't build for me : - %doc %{peclName}-%{version}/README + %doc %{peclName}/README rpmlint : php-pecl-runkit.src: I: checking php-pecl-runkit.src:39: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes php-pear-%{peclName} php-pecl-runkit.src: W: summary-not-capitalized runkit - mangle with user defined functions and classes php-pecl-runkit.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Languages/PHP php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized runkit - mangle with user defined functions and classes php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Languages/PHP php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided php-pear-runkit php-pecl-runkit-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-runkit.spec:39: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes php-pear-%{peclName} 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Most of them can be fixed easily - stuff php-pear-%{peclName} is not usefull in Fedora (php-pear-runkit don't exists AFAIK) - %{peclName} could be removed from desc and first word capitalized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241622.n1OGMXou027194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 11:22:31 EDT --- qbittorrent-0.9.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qbittorrent-0.9.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456783] Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241622.n1OGMris025772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456783 --- Comment #2 from Mathieu BONIFACE 2009-02-24 11:22:51 EDT --- I'm not particularly interested to maintain this package now, consequently you can take it. In fact I've proposed it because it was a dependence for ? galaxium messenger ?, but the project seems dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241623.n1OGNK7P025861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-24 11:23:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-JSON Short Description: Test JSON data Owners: allisson Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:30:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:30:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226607] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-microtouch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241630.n1OGUplQ029457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226607 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-24 11:30:50 EDT --- This has been dropped from the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241632.n1OGW3Fn028218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-24 11:32:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Thanks for the update. > > Package fails to build under mock for rawhide (gcc 4.4). > Mainly because of gcc headers cleanup some headers now are not included by > default or indirectly through some other headers. > please consider the following patch: Excellent. Thanks for the patch. I've sent it upstream. New spec, srpm, and koji scratch build: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.1b-4.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1159533 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449037] Review Request: afio - cpio compatible archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241632.n1OGWApN029906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449037 --- Comment #26 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-24 11:32:04 EDT --- It is worth noting that I strongly disagree with Koen's perception. It is incredibly unlikely that we will ever include afio due to its licensing issues. We have zero visibility on the intentions of the initial copyright holder, nor do we know who that is anymore. Koen's assumptions seriously stretch the bounds of existant copyright case law. Leaving this as CLOSED, CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241641.n1OGfe9t032526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Geoff Levand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Geoff Levand 2009-02-24 11:41:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ps3-utils Short Description: Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 Owners: geofflevand Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 16:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241654.n1OGssM7003467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 475146, which changed state. Bug 475146 Summary: import vtk fails - selinux issue I guess https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475146 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 17:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241738.n1OHcIHc015434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-24 12:38:17 EDT --- Cool. Jay, please apply for the 'packager' group in FAS and I'll sponsor you. Thanks for everything, and it was great meeting you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 17:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241740.n1OHeqJ2016061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #15 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-24 12:40:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I've tried to use the package (both with and without the libXpm-devel BR) in a I'll add the BR as soon as there will be new sources with fixing the very last licensing problem (BSD with ad.) > F-10 guest and results were... strange: > - if run from a GUI (direct access from the VM GUI), I can see the message > "press PAUSE or mouse right button for menu" on the topmost line of the screen. > The rest of the screen is filled with an ugly backgroun, vaguely similar to a > text screen (the aspect from the turbo vision GUI from the '90s ) full of stars > (one star per cell). The only way to interact is to press the right button of > the mouse, keep it pressed while moving over the desired menu entry and release > the button only after the mouse is over the desired entry. Not the most > intuitive interface... I've never seen that before on any system that I've > worked with, since the era of SFDX Yes, me too, and I'm afraid this was intended (but I'll ask upstream to make sure it is not just misconfiguration or something like that). > - if run from a text console (ssh from the host text console), the mouse is not > detected at all (I am offered the choice RETURN to start the app without mouse > support or CTRL-C to kill it). After starting without mouse support, I failed > to identify the right keyboard combination to trigger any menu action. The > screen is once again filled with some blue-ish sort of background Please make sure that gpm is running (service gpm start) -- ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 18:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241834.n1OIYuDM029137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #1 from Dan Young 2009-02-24 13:34:55 EDT --- Examining the output of rpmlint run against your SRPM/RPMs is always a good place to start. Are you a Fedora Contributor and member of the packager group, or are you seeking sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 18:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241854.n1OIsBGo002077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-24 13:54:10 EDT --- Added tests directory. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-5.fc10.src.rpm Also, I've contacted upstream about the shebangs; they will be removed in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 19:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456783] Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241914.n1OJEde0007931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456783 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 19:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241943.n1OJheOp015986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 19:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241942.n1OJgYAS015828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palango at gmx.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 19:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902241943.n1OJhFvc016588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palango at gmx.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242004.n1OK4m7G022625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #5 from Christian Krause 2009-02-24 15:04:47 EDT --- Hello Jess, good: - all mentioned issues solved - content of the binary packages is now ok very minor issue - just for completeness: - omit the macro in the changelog of the spec file, otherwise rpmlint will complain: SPECS/argtable2.spec:66: W: macro-in-%changelog _defaultdocdir - you've added the spec file to the sources, so the sources in the provided src.rpm are slightly different from the ones on sf.net Besides these two little minor issues I think the package looks very good. Since I'm not an "offical" reviewer I could only help you up to this point and so somebody with that status has to do the final formal review to give you the approval for the new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478364] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Readmem - Parse Verilog $readmemh or $readmemb text file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242014.n1OKEmRl024049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478364 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-24 15:14:47 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Readmem-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242018.n1OKInHg026401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #16 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-24 15:18:47 EDT --- >rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/kde-plasma-networkmanagement-*0.5* [...] kde-plasma-networkmanagement-devel.x86_64: W: tag-in-description Obsoletes: Something that looks like a tag was found in the package's description. This may indicate a problem where the tag was not actually parsed as a tag but just textual description content, thus being a no-op. Verify if this is the case, and move the tag to a place in the specfile where %description won't fool the specfile parser, and rebuild the package. [...] The P/O for subpackages are wrong placed, they must be before the %description otherwise they're taken as part of the %description as described in the rpmlint warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242041.n1OKfB9D031048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:41:10 EDT --- cgit-0.8.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242041.n1OKfG53031104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.2-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:44:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242044.n1OKiAwI031782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:44:08 EDT --- mrpt-0.6.5-0.3.20090213svn807.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242042.n1OKgsxW031565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:42:53 EDT --- php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242043.n1OKhWnO031683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:44:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242044.n1OKitFH031987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:44:54 EDT --- cutecom-0.20.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242042.n1OKgOcg031467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.2-1.fc9 |0.8.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484509] Review Request: php-ezc-Base - eZ Components Base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242044.n1OKiFNq031824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484509 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:44:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242046.n1OKkcwr000382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:46:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242046.n1OKkVOl000336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.3-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485636] Review Request: cutecom - A GUI application for serial port communications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242045.n1OKj0mI032031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.20.0-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242042.n1OKgxua031607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.1-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242044.n1OKiHEA031855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.5-0.3.20090213svn807.fc | |10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:44:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242044.n1OKiUl8031920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:44:29 EDT --- asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.14-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update asterisk-sounds-core'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481521] Review Request: sugar-clock - Clock activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242042.n1OKg8Kg031405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:42:07 EDT --- sugar-clock-0-0.2.20090207.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-clock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479723] Review Request: cgit - A fast webinterface for git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242042.n1OKgKJ7000432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479723 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:42:19 EDT --- cgit-0.8.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242043.n1OKhvPe000864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:43:56 EDT --- pdumpfs-1.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242046.n1OKkRVi001890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:46:26 EDT --- python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478393] Review Request: sugar-imageviewer - Simple image viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242043.n1OKhRrl000720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478393 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:43:26 EDT --- sugar-imageviewer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242044.n1OKi2tO000907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.3-4.fc9 Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242045.n1OKjJDx001453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:45:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242043.n1OKh0Xe000645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:42:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242043.n1OKhqdu000834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:43:51 EDT --- php-channel-ezc-1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-channel-ezc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1948 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242042.n1OKgjjT000539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:42:44 EDT --- python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update python-wifi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-1939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKm9qH001045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:48:08 EDT --- mono-nat-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKmZi1001169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:48:34 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242051.n1OKp00g002199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:50:59 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding-0.05-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242049.n1OKnLbK001416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:49:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476449] Review Request: perl-SystemC-Vregs - Utility routines used by vregs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242047.n1OKlhQ2000927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476449 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:47:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKmdoA001232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2.1-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242050.n1OKoEhu003945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:50:09 EDT --- Glauber: Any reply to comment #16? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486529] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Response-Encoding - Adds encoding() to HTTP::Response In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242051.n1OKp5uw002335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486529 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.05-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKms6d002986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.3-2.fc10 |0.1.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242047.n1OKlZkN002452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:47:34 EDT --- mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKmL6m002748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:48:20 EDT --- perl-HTML-Lint-2.06-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476776] Review Request: python-shove - Common object storage frontend. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKmn7S002923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476776 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:48:48 EDT --- python-shove-0.1.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242049.n1OKn657003085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.10.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242049.n1OKn2sc003042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:49:01 EDT --- python-weberror-0.10.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242051.n1OKp24L004297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:51:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486558] Review Request: mono-nat - .NET library for automatic port forwarding In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKmErT002704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486558 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|mono-nat-1.0-1.fc11 |1.0-1.fc10 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242047.n1OKlekO002502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3-3.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486528] Review Request: perl-HTML-Lint - Perl HTML parser and checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242048.n1OKmPSo002788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486528 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.06-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKtJrn004675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:55:19 EDT --- php-pecl-imagick-2.2.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242056.n1OKu9wZ005034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:56:08 EDT --- python-weberror-0.10.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKtqGY004840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:55:51 EDT --- thunar-shares-plugin-0.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242056.n1OKuFPk005092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.10.1-1.fc9 |0.10.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKtOt5004709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2.1-3.fc9 |2.2.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242054.n1OKsMqx004062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:54:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486519] Review Request: thunar-shares-plugin - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKtvQB004878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486519 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKtFSk006207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:55:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242056.n1OKuTJd006524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:56:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484507] Review Request: php-channel-ezc - eZ Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKt687006068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484507 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:55:05 EDT --- php-channel-ezc-1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-channel-ezc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2012 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478300] Review Request: python-wifi - Python binding for the wireless extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242053.n1OKrRIW003765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478300 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:53:26 EDT --- python-wifi-0.3.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-wifi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483331] Review Request: asterisk-sounds-core - Core sounds for Asterisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242056.n1OKuO30006482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483331 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:56:23 EDT --- asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.14-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update asterisk-sounds-core'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2025 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484360] Review Request: gedit-vala - Vala Toys for gEdit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242055.n1OKtgni004769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484360 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:55:41 EDT --- gedit-vala-0.3.2-3.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gedit-vala'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2019 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242058.n1OKwe0O006126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:58:39 EDT --- pdumpfs-1.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242058.n1OKwCRd005979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:58:09 EDT --- jeuclid-3.1.3-9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242057.n1OKveen005846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:57:39 EDT --- gigolo-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:58:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242058.n1OKwHla006063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.1.3-9.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242057.n1OKvrQg007295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 15:57:52 EDT --- qbittorrent-1.2.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242059.n1OKxPKu007896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:59:24 EDT --- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486865] Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242057.n1OKvNri007029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486865 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:57:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485604] Review Request: gigolo - GIO/GVFS management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242057.n1OKvjmt007239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485604 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.1-1.fc10 |0.2.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242058.n1OKwNkq007505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 15:58:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480857] Review Request: pdumpfs - Daily backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242058.n1OKwjcO007696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-4.fc9 |1.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242103.n1OL35e4008069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.43-3.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: marlin - A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242106.n1OL63Rd008785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Marlin - A |Review Request: marlin - A |Sound Sample Editor for |Sound Sample Editor for |GNOME |GNOME Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 16:06:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242102.n1OL2xjm009766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 16:02:57 EDT --- mingw32-nsis-2.43-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242107.n1OL7lNt009364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239883 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 16:07:43 EDT --- Jermey: I am going to clear the fedora-cvs flag. If you want to branch and maintain this yourself, feel free to note that here and reset the flag to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242110.n1OLArgm011989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 16:10:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242112.n1OLCsgE010585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 16:12:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242111.n1OLBwPf010320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 16:11:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242115.n1OLFtUM013223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #16 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-24 16:15:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > - if run from a GUI (direct access from the VM GUI), I can see the message > "press PAUSE or mouse right button for menu" on the topmost line of the screen. > The rest of the screen is filled with an ugly backgroun, vaguely similar to a > text screen (the aspect from the turbo vision GUI from the '90s ) full of stars > (one star per cell). The only way to interact is to press the right button of > the mouse, keep it pressed while moving over the desired menu entry and release > the button only after the mouse is over the desired entry. Not the most > intuitive interface... I've never seen that before on any system that I've > worked with, since the era of SFDX I'm quoting the reply from upstream: " First of all, twin is not really supposed to be run inside a generic terminal (or terminal emulator) as the features will be limited and the display will look ugly (stars instead of pseudo-graphic characters, limited or missing mouse support, ...) For the best experience it is supposed to be used on Linux console or, if you feel silly, inside an X11 session with an Unicode font or inside itself. As for the retro look reminding Turbo Vision GUI, it is intentional. After all, twin means Text-mode WINdowing environment. The look-and-feel can be customized up to a certain limit, but basicly twin is supposed to sit "in the background" while the user interacts with windows drawn inside it. So, maybe the default configuration should start at least a maximized terminal with user's shell running in it... Also, trying to judge twin _server_ user interface is a bit funny: it's like saying that running X11 server from the command line brings up a checkered background with a cross-shaped mouse pointer and you cannot do anything useful with it. While technically true, it's not how users are supposed to use X11: just as people use window managers or desktop environments (kde/gnome/...) running inside X11, it would be more fair (and useful) to comment at least twdm or twterm running inside twin. " The sources have been updated, I've changed the source URL to SourceForge.net on upstream's demand, added BR: libXpm-devel, fixed the typo in changelog: New SPEC file: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin.spec New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/twin/twin-0.6.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 20:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242057.n1OKvxwi007346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242125.n1OLPYs0013694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #17 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-24 16:25:32 EDT --- Manuel, I'm just considering that I'd include also the small twutils (contains a kcalc-like app for twin) and xmms-twin sources into this one package (please look at http://linuz.sns.it/~max/twin/) -- what do you think about it? For me it doesn't seem to be worth making extra packages for all of them. Sorry for mass-mailing today, I was talking a lot with upstream etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242131.n1OLVxXf015211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #2 from Dan Young 2009-02-24 16:31:58 EDT --- Review Board also has django-evolution as a dep. Here's an initial spec: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/reviewboard/django-evolution.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 21:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242146.n1OLkt3N020097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Jon Levell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at coralbark.net --- Comment #5 from Jon Levell 2009-02-24 16:46:54 EDT --- Informal review: Looks good to me, the only quibble I would have is the make command does not use flags to enable parallel make and there are enough source parts to warrant using it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make i.e. change make blahtexml-linux to make %{?_smp_mflags} blahtexml-linux which is faster on my system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 22:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242211.n1OMBCuV024378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 17:11:11 EDT --- muse-1.0-0.4.rc1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/muse-1.0-0.4.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 22:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242219.n1OMJWun025665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 22:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242217.n1OMHcKh027218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 --- Comment #22 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-02-24 17:17:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: clips New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 22:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487241] New: Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487241 Summary: Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/ntlmaps/ntlmaps.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/ntlmaps/ntlmaps-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: NTLM Authorization Proxy Server is a proxy software that allows you to authenticate via a Microsoft Proxy Server using the proprietary NTLM protocol. Since version 0.9.5 APS has an ability to behave as a standalone proxy server and authenticate http clients at web servers using NTLM method. rpmlint output: 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Note, I am a new upstream maintainer for this very old project. As such, the current source code is not tagged as version 1.0 yet in the upstream SVN, but I intend to tag it as version 1.0 quite soon, pending any major bugs found over the next few days. I won't request a Fedora build of the code until I have tagged the upstream as version 1.0, but also wanted to get the review started now. Thanks, Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 22:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:41:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242241.n1OMfVct031077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #9 from Jay Hankinson 2009-02-24 17:41:30 EDT --- Enjoyed meeting you all too. Very worth while afternoon. What about the comments form Nicolas Mailhot? Presumably I need to re-do the fontconfig file? Also forgive my ignorance but remind me what/where FAS is again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242305.n1ON5JZm006407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 --- Comment #3 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-02-24 18:05:18 EDT --- Here's an updated spec and srpm: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/osgGtk.spec http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/osgGtk-0.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm And the changelog: - Improved package summaries and descriptions - Added hicolor-icon-theme to viewer requires - Removed fedora vendor tag for desktop files - Added desktop file validation on install - Fixed license tag - Parameterized prep directory - Fixed unowned directories issue in devel files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242302.n1ON2JEn005606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 Jon Levell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at coralbark.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Levell 2009-02-24 18:02:18 EDT --- This is just an informal review: 1) Using rpmlint on your spec file shows that for the main package you have omitted the %defattr section. It should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) 2) For the emacs subpackage, the defattr line should also be changed to the above. 3) The license tag should be GPLv2+ as the copyright headers allow you to use the code under a later version. 4) building the package with mock and running rpmlint on the resulting rpms gives warnings: rpmlint -i emacs-pydb-1.25-3.fc10.noarch.rpm emacs-pydb.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. and rpmlint -i pydb-1.25-3.fc10.noarch.rpm pydb.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/pydb /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pydb/pydb.py Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. The first is border-line: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-documentation but the COPYING file should probably be included in at least one of the rpms The second can be fixed by following an example like: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc//rpms/python-kid/devel/python-kid.spec?view=markup Other than the above, the rest looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242309.n1ON9oRX005480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at christoph- | |wickert.de) --- Comment #3 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-02-24 18:09:49 EDT --- I have the following error when i build the package (rpmbuild -ba) : >checking for GTK... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.12.0 >gmodule-export-2.0) were not met: > >No package 'gtk+-2.0' found The "gtk2" is installed. It's a problem with my config or something else (need a makefile patch maybe) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: marlin - A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242325.n1ONPTVd008856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 18:25:28 EDT --- marlin-0.13-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/marlin-0.13-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242326.n1ONQpNF010949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-24 18:26:45 EDT --- I don't think your response has been at all slow, especially compared with the speed of most merge reviews. (I have some where I haven't been able to get a response for 18 months.) I'll go ahead and do a full review now. Honestly the only thing I can add is that that you can drop the versioned dependencies on php and tmpwatch, since the required versions have been present in every release as far back as I can see (FC1, at least). Not really a big deal. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 8fa5b82bb2e4448da80d2ccc42ec9874df8674691358736da6c7c3f7bbbae639 all_locales-1.4.13-20071220.tar.bz2 b14d3ef3735f8c7b49b091533c567048b3a06eb633eccbfeddd7cd8fdd2ffe25 squirrelmail-1.4.17.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints * final provides and requires are sane: config(squirrelmail) = 1.4.17-2.fc11 squirrelmail = 1.4.17-2.fc11 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env /usr/sbin/sendmail aspell config(squirrelmail) = 1.4.17-2.fc11 httpd perl perl(Cwd) ? php >= 4.0.4 php-mbstring ? tmpwatch >= 2.8 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, and closed. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: marlin - A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242327.n1ONRkUO009338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Dodji Seketeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242334.n1ONYeCf010771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fedora at christoph- | |wickert.de) | --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-24 18:34:38 EDT --- As is sais in comment #2 this needs to be gtk2-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242352.n1ONqwTL014829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-02-24 18:52:57 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-ezc-ConsoleTools Error in package name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 24 23:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902242358.n1ONwoKj016335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 18:58:49 EDT --- I think the package should probably "Requires: hal" for the %{_datadir}/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor directory. A license file is really required too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250001.n1P01CgI018528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 19:01:10 EDT --- Otherwise rpmlint output is clean - a license file would also get rid of the no documentation warning. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250005.n1P057sn017845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 19:05:07 EDT --- > NOTE: The files in this packages conflict with the ones shipped in > xorg-x11-server-Xorg. This is intentional, it is going to replace them (X will > than depend on this package). It might be worth adding a "Conflicts: xorg-x11-server-Xorg < (last fedora-setup-keyboard.py version-(release+1))" for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250010.n1P0AuOH018910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 19:10:55 EDT --- php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250013.n1P0DkMJ019376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-02-24 19:13:46 EDT --- Imported and built for F-10 and devel. Doesn't build on F-9 because php-pear version is too old (available 1.7.1, required 1.7.2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250013.n1P0DDCT019304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-24 19:13:13 EDT --- I've made those changes here: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/levien-inconsolata-fonts/levien-inconsolata-fonts-1.01-2.fc11.src.rpm However, it's not building here under mock. I can't seem to track down why. ;( Will keep looking, but if anyone has any ideas, let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250018.n1P0Iwqj020284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 19:18:57 EDT --- grnotify-1.1.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grnotify-1.1.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 00:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250019.n1P0J33q020327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 19:19:02 EDT --- grnotify-1.1.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grnotify-1.1.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 01:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250118.n1P1Ivbh000532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 lexual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss at lex.hider.name Version|7 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 01:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250145.n1P1jS5U005625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-02-24 20:45:24 EDT --- One last small nitpick: BuildRequires: jpackage-utils is listed twice. Looks like it slipped in after I asked you to fix it in comment #30. Please fix it again upon import. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 01:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250152.n1P1qXoq006874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #44 from lexual 2009-02-24 20:52:31 EDT --- http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-December/thread.html#16008 More details about cairo & xcb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250226.n1P2QbTo014594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #18 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-02-24 21:26:34 EDT --- New update SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250227.n1P2RG1x014046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-02-24 21:27:15 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486475] Review Request: ps3-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250233.n1P2XB7o015819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486475 Geoff Levand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250238.n1P2cbkP016862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 21:38:36 EDT --- lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:39:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250239.n1P2dLlo017011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 21:39:20 EDT --- lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 02:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250252.n1P2qjpd020082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-24 21:52:44 EDT --- Oops, wrong bug number in the update, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 03:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250350.n1P3oMOb000575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #10 from David Carter 2009-02-24 22:50:21 EDT --- That's "clock issues" not "lock issues" :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 03:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250349.n1P3n71h032599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from D Haley 2009-02-24 22:49:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flexdock Short Description: Docking framework for Java Swing GUI apps Owners: mycae Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 03:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250348.n1P3m6p5000491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #9 from David Carter 2009-02-24 22:48:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333130) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333130) koji build log showing test case errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 03:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250347.n1P3lLZm000347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #8 from David Carter 2009-02-24 22:47:19 EDT --- Again, this is a practice review, so treat accordingly. It seemed to go fine except when building with koji where it failed some test cases. This didn't occur when building locally, or with mock. There may be some lock issues. I'm attaching the build log from koji. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint -i /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result/python-foolscap-0.3.2-1.fc10.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines ok MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK fc10-x86_64 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Failed some of the test cases in koji. Error log attached. Ran fine in mock. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example OK SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 04:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250455.n1P4tlQf013836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 23:55:46 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 04:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250454.n1P4sclm013605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 23:54:37 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 04:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250454.n1P4sib4013641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 23:54:44 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N-0.08-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 04:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250455.n1P4ts94014163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-24 23:55:53 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI-0.08-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250503.n1P53WFY015425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #24 from Tomas 2009-02-25 00:03:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > * final provides and requires are sane: ... > ? php >= 4.0.4 > php-mbstring mbstring extension was introduced in PHP 4.0.6. SquirrelMail 1.4.x requires PHP 4.1.0 or better. Code has issues in php 4.0.x (some quirks with used objects) and last PHP 4.0.x compatibility code was removed in 1.4.11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486905] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI - Saves session IDs by rewriting URIs delivered to the client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250516.n1P5GGgS018080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486905 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486904] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-I18N - I18N for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250517.n1P5H0Bv018158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486904 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250537.n1P5bM3Y021465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 --- Comment #15 from John Guthrie 2009-02-25 00:37:20 EDT --- Thank you very much. That last permission change can be seen at http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/simplyhtml-0.12.5-5.fc10.src.rpm for reference. Onto the CVS procedure now... Again, thank you for all of your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250545.n1P5jGKX023324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from John Guthrie 2009-02-25 00:45:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: simplyhtml Short Description: Application and a java component for rich text processing Owners: guthrie Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 05:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] New: Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 Summary: Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/preferences-menus.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/preferences-menus-1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package recreates the Preferences submenus that Fedora used to have by default in F10 and earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250606.n1P66e5L027384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250619.n1P6J3VF028824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-25 01:19:03 EDT --- 1) Good to add versioned requires 2) From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream , Will you please add comment in SPEC file. Otherwise I see no way to verify source here. 3) From review guidelines, SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. 4) Though for such small package where no upstream release happened, it looks not really needed but good to follow guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps ==> Add -p to install command -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 06:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250627.n1P6R548030622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-25 01:27:04 EDT --- The package renaming changes %{fontname} and a define was changed to global. Maybe there's a conflict with your use of $fontname in the fontforge script? Otherwise, can you post failing build logs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 07:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250724.n1P7OkSr008061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 07:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:30:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250730.n1P7UDwc009153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-02-25 02:30:12 EDT --- Yes, I think that's an issue with intel graphic card and its drivers :( I use Fedora 10 and its latest blender package. Yes, I can run blender itself. I'll check the main binary soon. :) Anyway, please do something about the Licensing issue for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 07:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486758] Review Request: yofrankie-bge - 3D Game with characters from Big Buck Bunny movie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250738.n1P7cTOF010214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486758 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-25 02:38:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, I think that's an issue with intel graphic card and its drivers :( Yup, they're not in the healthiest state now. I can't try that myself, since F10 intel drivers don't work for me at all (cause lockups), so I use large part of X11 from F9. > Anyway, please do something about the Licensing issue for now. I don't think there's not much I can do about it now. I did not get a reply from the recipient of the original mail, so I'll resend it to a couple more addresses and wait a couple of days. I'll proceed replacing the logos just in case I won't get any reply even then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 08:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 224245] Merge Review: squirrelmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250831.n1P8VWJE019766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224245 --- Comment #25 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-02-25 03:31:31 EDT --- thanks for the review tmpwatch rawhide, F10, F9 : 2.9.13 RHEL-3,4,5 : 2.8.4, 2.9.1, 2.9.7 php rawhide, F10, F9 : 5.2.8 RHEL-3,4,5 : 4.3.2, 4.3.9, 5.1.6 I'll drop versioned dependencies, it seems versions are not needed anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 08:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250852.n1P8qLeJ023153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 --- Comment #6 from Jasper Capel 2009-02-25 03:52:20 EDT --- Thanks! Updated: specfile: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml.spec source-rpm: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml-0.6-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250915.n1P9F9aG029005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #18 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-25 04:15:07 EDT --- Explanations are sane enough and to be honest I am not surprised, which is why I tried to run it from a plain console, too. I'll test the new version too, but gpm was always started and the mouse was not working, so I guess there is (was ? ) a bug somewhere ... maybe in the mouse detection code ? As of twutils and xmms-twin, I would create separate binary packages, even if coming from the same src.rpm. After all they are different projects, aren't they ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250919.n1P9Jjgs029763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-25 04:19:44 EDT --- * When using "install" (or "cp") to install unmodified files yourself, prefer option "-p" to preserve timestamps. This is considered helpful by users, who want to recognise the age of files (e.g. ancient documentation). Otherwise it shouldn't be overrated. ;) * Our global compiler flags are not used: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags * Please drop "Requires: xerces-c" in favour of rpmbuild's automatic dependency on the "libxerces-c.so.28" SONAME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250918.n1P9IcnA029598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-02-25 04:18:36 EDT --- Ah, the answer is in the logs: Warning: tests will fail (unclean reactor warnings) when pyOpenSSL >= 0.7 is used in conjunction with Twisted <= 8.1.0 . The workaround is to use the pollreactor instead of the default selectreactor (trial -r poll). This bug is fixed in Twisted trunk, and should appear in the next release of Twisted. pyOpenSSL version: 0.7 Twisted version: 2.5.0 reactor: See http://foolscap.lothar.com/trac/ticket/62 for details. That might explain why the tests fail for you on Fedora 10, and work on rawhide (it has a newer version of Twisted). I'm only planning to build python-foolscap for rawhide though, so we should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250918.n1P9IFRs029524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-25 04:18:13 EDT --- * Preferably bump "Release" prior to offering new src.rpm builds. That's helpful when using rpmdev-diff. Here the 1.25-3.fc10 has been modified silently. * "Group" could be "Development/Debuggers" * "License: GPLv2+" and the source files mention GPL 2 or later, but file "COPYING" is the GPL 3. Can you get upstream to clarify this? * Instead of %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz prefer %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* since the manual pages get compressed automatically, and the compression method and file extension may change. * Why "BuildRequires: fontconfig"? * It's good packaging-practice to run a test-suite target, if available, and provided that it is not known to be broken: --- pydb.spec.orig 2009-02-25 00:37:38.000000000 +0100 +++ pydb.spec 2009-02-25 09:46:13.000000000 +0100 @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} ln -sf ../..%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/%{name}.py %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} +%check +make check + %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250925.n1P9Pxb5030843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-25 04:25:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch Short Description: Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk Owners: msuchy Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250944.n1P9ivD5001842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-02-25 04:44:56 EDT --- New version with init script: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250956.n1P9uf5v005790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-02-25 04:56:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Preferably bump "Release" prior to offering new src.rpm builds. That's > helpful when using rpmdev-diff. Here the 1.25-3.fc10 has been modified > silently. > Yes. You were faster than me. The new src.rpm is: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/pydb-1.25-4.fc10.src.rpm > > * "Group" could be "Development/Debuggers" Done. > > > * "License: GPLv2+" and the source files mention GPL 2 or later, but file > "COPYING" is the GPL 3. Can you get upstream to clarify this? > > > * Instead of > > %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz > > prefer > > %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* Done. > > since the manual pages get compressed automatically, and the compression method > and file extension may change. > > > * Why "BuildRequires: fontconfig"? I do not remember why. Maybe some issue with emacs. I'll go check. > > > * It's good packaging-practice to run a test-suite target, if available, and > provided that it is not known to be broken: > > Included. I also had already included all Jon Levell's observations. Thanks to both of you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 09:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902250952.n1P9qIqm003941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-25 04:52:17 EDT --- Thanks - package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 10:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:04:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251004.n1PA4aa5007447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 10:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251004.n1PA4MS2007381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-25 05:04:20 EDT --- > > fontconfig > > I do not remember why. Maybe some issue with emacs. Hint: Add a comment in the spec file. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 10:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251004.n1PA4uHm006334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 --- Comment #8 from Jasper Capel 2009-02-25 05:04:55 EDT --- Thanks, all done: specfile: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml.spec source-rpm: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/blahtexml-0.6-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 10:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487281] New: Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487281 Summary: Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.spb.su QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/eGroupware/eGroupware.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/eGroupware/eGroupware-1.6.001-7.fc9.src.rpm Description: eGroupware is a web-based groupware suite written in PHP. Include many usefully applications such as: (bug)tracker, Site management, web-mail client, project management (time planning, Gannt diagrams, HRM), TODO lists, address book, import-export in many formats, synchronization with many standalone clients such us Thunderbird, Outlook, mobile phones, FAQ management, and many many more. Some additional questions/things for the future reviewer: 1) koji build successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1168509 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1168381 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1168637 2) rpmlint on src.rpm and spec file is silent. rpmlint on binary packages is NOT silent, but most of errors is gone, and few are: 2.1) Many "W: no-documentation" - I extract all documentation what was be able to find, but few packages do not contain it at all. I think it is not critical. 2.2) "E: zero-length". This files has zero length in upstream tarball. I can delete it, but I prefer leave it as is (what if it will be filled in future?). 2.3) Tail of errors: $ rpmlint eGroupware-*.rpm | egrep -v 'W: no-documentation|E: zero-length' eGroupware-core.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cron.d/eGroupware eGroupware-gallery.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/egroupware/gallery/gallery2 ../../gallery2 30 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 43 errors, 20 warnings. 2.3.1) Is really /etc/cron.d/eGroupware should be marked as config?? Why? I can't find anything in documentation/guidelines on this theme. My thing it is not config and reported by rpmlint erroneously. 2.3.2) Symlink is not dangling. It is relied to installed gallery2 package in system and it is already mentioned in Requires. So, this error happened only unless installation was done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 10:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251050.n1PAoFkq016688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #1 from Jasper Capel 2009-02-25 05:50:14 EDT --- Updated files, made it respect the global compiler flags, and preserve timestamps when installing files. Spec URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec SRPM URL: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 11:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251110.n1PBAc6l022182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #10 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-02-25 06:10:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.lshift.net/~hubert/rabbitmq-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lshift.net/~hubert/rabbitmq-server-1.5.3-1.src.rpm These include fixes for all the problems you mentioned apart from that: * you should consider using rm %{_maindir}/{LICENSE,LICENSE-MPL-RabbitMQ,INSTALL} instead of rm %{_maindir}/LICENSE %{_maindir}/LICENSE-MPL-RabbitMQ %{_maindir}/INSTALL There reason for this is that this pattern is available for some newer version of rpmbuild, but we also tend to make releases on machines that have version 4.4.2.1 installed and does not support it. It is only a shortcut, but works ok without it. I hope you are ok with that? I also included few other fixes, you will probably see them in the spec etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 11:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487296] New: Review Request: sssd - System Security Services Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sssd - System Security Services Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487296 Summary: Review Request: sssd - System Security Services Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/sssd/sssd.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/sssd/sssd-0.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Provides a set of daemons to manage access to remote directories and authentication mechanisms. It provides an NSS and PAM interface toward the system and a pluggable backend system to connect to multiple different account sources. It is also the basis to provide client auditing and policy services for projects like FreeIPA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 11:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251144.n1PBi04N028631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #12 from David Carter 2009-02-25 06:43:59 EDT --- Yes, it build fine under koji with dist-f11. I'm unable to build it under mock at this time as it has some unrelated yum issues. So I guess as a practice reviewer, I'm OK with it as it is. Now you just need someone authorized to approve :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 11:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487296] Review Request: sssd - System Security Services Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251144.n1PBi9Nl028656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487296 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Hrozek 2009-02-25 06:44:08 EDT --- I should note that sssd is currently not buildable with libtevent,libtdb and libldb versions of packages available in Fedora. These are also requirements of samba4 that is under review, too. However, a reviewer can already look at the specfile and/or build sssd with the in-tree versions of libraries and headers, there's a couple of hints in the BUILD.txt file in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 13:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] New: Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 Summary: Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pknirsch at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned.spec SRPM URL: http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The tuned package contains a daemon that tunes system settings dynamically. It is part of the Fedora 11 Power Management feature (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PowerManagement) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 13:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251329.n1PDTu25022957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 Phil Knirsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 13:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251353.n1PDruIL028556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-25 08:53:54 EDT --- lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f9-updates by bodhi lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc9 successfully moved from dist-f9-updates-candidate into dist-f9-updates by bodhi (somehow bodhi fails to update bugzilla) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 14:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251421.n1PEL1XV003325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 14:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251443.n1PEhVWP009278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 09:43:30 EDT --- I've added the versioned requires, add a comment and even did the -p. Then, I've queried upstream (myself), but upstream said no. New files in the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251511.n1PFBLep017740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #1 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-02-25 10:11:19 EDT --- First check: I'm a bit worried about the simple groupadd in post and simple groupdel in postun ... service is quite common name for group and I could imagine that group being used for "service" guys on some machines... by simple removal of libservicelog package, you will delete that group without warning - imho too dangerous... I remember case of Amanda (as user) and troubles which were caused by amanda package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487349] New: BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487349 Summary: BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://bashdb.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/bashdb.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/bashdb-4.0_0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm The Bash Debugger Project is a source-code debugger for bash, which follows the gdb command syntax. The purpose of the BASH debugger is to check what is going on ?inside? a bash script, while it executes: * Start a script, specifying conditions that might affect its behaviour. * Stop a script at certain conditions (break points). * Examine the state of a script. * Experiment, by changing variable values on the fly. The version 4.0 series is a complete rewrite of the previous series. Bashdb can be used with ddd: ddd --debugger /usr/bin/bashdb . Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251547.n1PFlmnN028012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:49:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487349] Review Request: bashdb - BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251549.n1PFnh0q028382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487349 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|BASH debugger, the BASH |Review Request: bashdb - |symbolic debugger |BASH debugger, the BASH | |symbolic debugger -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:50:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251550.n1PFoohQ029026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-02-25 10:50:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > > fontconfig > > > > I do not remember why. Maybe some issue with emacs. > > Hint: Add a comment in the spec file. ;-) fontconfig does not seem to be necessary, indeed. I removed the BR, and updated the spec and .src.rpm, but did not change the release (it is a very small change). I am also submitting bashdb, and I would appreciate if both of you could take a look at it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 15:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251547.n1PFlR5I027905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-25 10:47:25 EDT --- I'm actually using Weka right now, so I'll take the review. Will post review notes in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251610.n1PGAVbY002161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251610.n1PGAWFO002189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 468806, which changed state. Bug 468806 Summary: Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487349] Review Request: bashdb - BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251621.n1PGLQ42005262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487349 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-25 11:21:25 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: bashdb.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bashdb/getopts_long.sh 0644 => this one is ignorable, the script is to be used from inside bashdb emacs-bashdb.noarch: W: no-documentation => ignorable [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type as specified by sources: GPLv2+ License type as specified by spec: GPLv2 => unless I am mistaken, please fix the spec [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 9a4da7ff53cbb072140b1584385bf87eff26c824 bashdb-4.0-0.2.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] Package functions as described. Ttested in F10/x86_64 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. Please fix the license tag before commit === Notes === 1. I would add INSTALL="install -p" to the make install line ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: marlin - A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251623.n1PGNXCw005393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.13-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251622.n1PGMYra005202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:22:33 EDT --- php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish-1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251626.n1PGQ0FQ006674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:26:00 EDT --- lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251624.n1PGOvFB006023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:24:56 EDT --- lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251625.n1PGP54U006361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|lxsession-edit-0.1-1.fc9 |0.1-1.fc9 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484591] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251624.n1PGO1X4005584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484591 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:23:59 EDT --- muse-1.0-0.4.rc1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update muse'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485954] Review Request: marlin - A Sound Sample Editor for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251623.n1PGNTmo006078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485954 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:23:28 EDT --- marlin-0.13-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251624.n1PGOjtL005818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:24:44 EDT --- grnotify-1.1.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update grnotify'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251624.n1PGOXa2006484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:24:32 EDT --- perl-Test-Harness-Straps-0.30-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251626.n1PGQXQr007592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:26:32 EDT --- qbittorrent-0.9.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251623.n1PGNkAY006235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.1-6.fc9 |0.4.1-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251623.n1PGNHot005986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:23:16 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251623.n1PGNfXZ006152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:23:40 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.4.1-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251626.n1PGQcJ4007636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-2.fc10 |0.9.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251636.n1PGaIvm011132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Bug 449869 depends on bug 468055, which changed state. Bug 468055 Summary: broken dependency on F-9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] New: Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ksebasti at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ksebasti.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-oprofile.spec SRPM URL: http://ksebasti.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-oprofile-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Eclipse plugins to integrate OProfile's powerful profiling capabilities in the workbench. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486648] Review Request: simple-kiosk - Tools for creating a kiosk session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251650.n1PGoqEp014690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486648 --- Comment #3 from Warren Togami 2009-02-25 11:50:51 EDT --- This package will be renamed to browser-kiosk and the source tree will be pushed to a public URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251655.n1PGtxOm015670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Sebastian Vahl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Vahl 2009-02-25 11:55:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1172968 [x] Rpmlint output: menu-cache.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/menu-cache-0.2.2/ChangeLog menu-cache-devel.i386: W: no-documentation [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [!] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2+ [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : MD5SUM upstream package: [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [!] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f11-i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1172968 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. most files in menu-cache-gen are licensed under LGPLv2+, so the License of the whole package should be LGPLv2+ 2. menu-cache-devel requires glib2-devel which requires pkgconfig. 3. There was no new release of menu-cache in two months. So the ChangeLog entry in %doc should be addded when it is really included in the package. === Final Notes === 1. As discussed in Jabber, fix the above items and the package is approved. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251626.n1PGQ5P6007260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc9 |0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251623.n1PGNM62006032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.1-6.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486009] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-Blowfish - Quick two-way blowfish encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251622.n1PGMdbr005734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486009 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-0.3.rc2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483116] Review Request: grnotify - Google Reader Notifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251625.n1PGPDqx006936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483116 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 11:25:12 EDT --- grnotify-1.1.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update grnotify'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2077 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 16:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251659.n1PGxR8s015939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Bug 449869 depends on bug 468055, which changed state. Bug 468055 Summary: broken dependency on F-9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468055 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 17:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251706.n1PH64d3017878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at deadbabylon.de Flag| |fedora_requires_release_not | |e? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-25 12:06:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will fix the issues you raised after import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: menu-cache Short Description: Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus Owners: cwickert svahl Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 17:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251718.n1PHIlPJ021589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora-cvs? |e? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 17:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251727.n1PHRRSO024155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 Thomas Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |twoerner at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |twoerner at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 17:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251735.n1PHZEYQ025353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #61 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 12:35:07 EDT --- Indeed, all my earlier comments have been taken care of, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251801.n1PI18GZ031910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #6 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-25 13:01:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > NOTE: The files in this packages conflict with the ones shipped in > > xorg-x11-server-Xorg. This is intentional, it is going to replace them (X will > > than depend on this package). > > It might be worth adding a "Conflicts: xorg-x11-server-Xorg < (last > fedora-setup-keyboard.py version-(release+1))" for this. Well can't do this unless the xorg package is changed to use this fedora-setup-keyboard. (As xorg builds might be made during this review), besides it already conflicts with this packaged via file conflict. Fixed the other 2 issues (license file and hal requirement) http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fedora-setup-keyboard.spec http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/fedora-setup-keyboard-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251814.n1PIEx78002733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Woerner 2009-02-25 13:14:58 EDT --- $ rpmlint tuned-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK $ rpmlint tuned-0.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm tuned.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/tuned $prog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK $ rpmlint tuned-utils-0.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm tuned-utils.noarch: W: no-documentation tuned-utils.noarch: E: devel-dependency kernel-debuginfo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Hm, I wonder why there is a devel-dependency for kernel-debuginfo. I see that the scripts are systemtap scripts. Therefore this should be OK. Packaging guidelines: Can you please fix the URL for the git tree to be consistent and maybe add a description how to get the proper version from git? Please also fix the url in the wiki page. (See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL) Can you please use "%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)" for Buildroot? (See: BuildRoot tag at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) Please fix whitespaces in the GPL headers (example: tuned). Why is tuningplugins/__init__.py empty? Why is there a reference to configure in INSTALL. There is no configure script at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251814.n1PIEZ0v002680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #62 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 13:14:32 EDT --- Package builds fine in mock Formal review: rpmlint output: samba4.x86_64: E: no-binary samba4-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. The warning is ignorable, the error is caused by the main package being an empty shell for now. I understand this is just temporary, until samba4 gets released, so I don't think this is an issue. package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok; I guess you could be proactive and adapt to the coming recommendation of %global over %define, but thats not ratified yet, afaik license: ok license field: ok, but it would be nice to specify more exactly what parts are LGPL license file: ok spec language: ok spec legible: ok upstream source: ok buildable: ok buildrequires: ok excludearch: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: ok directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok, I notice that pidl uses %defattr(-,root,root,-) whereas the others use %defattr(-,root,root). Accident ? The former is preferred, I think %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok headers: ok pkgconfig: ok shared libs: ok -devel requires: ok, it requires -libs la files: ok gui apps: ok overlap with other packages: NOT ok. -pidl includes things that are owned by other packages, notably perl-Parse-Yapp %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok summary: - consider using %global - add license comment - consider cleaning up %defattr variation - fix -pidl conflicts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251820.n1PIKZ9j004841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 13:20:33 EDT --- Oded: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=evolution-mapi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251819.n1PIJcbi004264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #19 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 13:19:36 EDT --- One last update in preparation for a formal review. Just fixes some minor rpmlint warnings. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251821.n1PILkvA005066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aanjhan at tuxmaniac.com --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-02-25 13:21:44 EDT --- Aanjhaan, could you please have a look at this package and see if you can improve it. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487349] Review Request: bashdb - BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251846.n1PIkRW7010919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487349 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-02-25 13:46:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Package Review > ============== > > Key: > - = N/A > x = Check > ! = Problem > ? = Not evaluated > > === REQUIRED ITEMS === > [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec. > [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. > [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one > supported architecture. > Tested on: devel/x86_64 > [x] Rpmlint output: > source RPM: empty > binary RPM: > bashdb.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/bashdb/getopts_long.sh 0644 > => this one is ignorable, the script is to be used from inside bashdb > emacs-bashdb.noarch: W: no-documentation > => ignorable > [x] Package is not relocatable. > [x] Buildroot is correct > (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) > [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other > legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. > [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > License type as specified by sources: GPLv2+ > License type as specified by spec: GPLv2 > => unless I am mistaken, please fix the spec > [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package is included in %doc. > [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. > [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided > in the spec URL. > SHA1SUM of package: 9a4da7ff53cbb072140b1584385bf87eff26c824 > bashdb-4.0-0.2.tar.bz2 > [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. > [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that > are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. > [-] The spec file handles locales properly. > [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. > [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. > [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > [x] Permissions on files are set properly. > [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. > [x] Package consistently uses macros. > [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. > [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. > [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. > [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. > [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. > [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. > [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. > [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). > [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI > application. > [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > [x] Final provides and requires are sane. > > === SUGGESTED ITEMS === > [x] Latest version is packaged. > [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains > translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > Tested on: devel/x86_64 > [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures. > Tested on: > [x] Package functions as described. > Ttested in F10/x86_64 > [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. > [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. > [x] File based requires are sane. > [x] %check is present and the test passes. > > > === Issues === > 1. Please fix the license tag before commit Changed to GPLv2+ > > === Notes === > 1. I would add INSTALL="install -p" to the make install line Done. I also added a "check" section. %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install INSTALL="install -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} %{__rm} -f "%{buildroot}%{_infodir}/dir" %check make check Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251855.n1PItMFG013682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 18:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251855.n1PIt1aL013350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 13:54:59 EDT --- Package builds ok in mock rpmlint on the resulting rpms: openchange.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmapi.so.0.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 openchange.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libocpf.so.0.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 openchange-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation openchange-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/openchange/provision.py 0644 openchange-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/openchange/__init__.py 0644 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. The warnings are not serious, not sure what to make of the script error, it looks bogus to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 19:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251907.n1PJ78d2017516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-25 14:07:07 EDT --- Yeah, the old font fails exactly the same way, so it must be a change somewhere in rawhide. ;( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1167442&name=build.log + fontforge -script - /builddir/build/SOURCES/Inconsolata.sfd Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 16:11 GMT 24-Dec-2008. Library based on sources from 16:11 GMT 24-Dec-2008. File "", line 2 while ( i < $argc ) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.e4UUpX (%build) any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 19:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251930.n1PJUhWf023521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 19:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] New: Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 Summary: Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmoskovc at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/crash-catcher.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/crash-catcher-0.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: CrashCatcher is a tool to help users to detect defects in applications and to create a bug report with all informations needed by maintainer to fix it. It uses plugin system to extend its functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 19:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902251947.n1PJllZP029746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 Jiri Moskovcak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlaska at redhat.com, | |zprikryl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 20:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252012.n1PKCKCZ006943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 20:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252030.n1PKUwkJ013152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-02-25 15:30:56 EDT --- Coordinated fixes with upstream. Rpmlint output is now clean. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 20:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252031.n1PKVAsV013208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-25 15:31:08 EDT --- General guidelines: MUST + rpmlint + package name + spec file name + package guideline-compliant + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate + license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible + source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded noarch + build dependencies complete N/A locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale + own all directories + no dupes in %files + permission + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code + large docs => -doc (-javadoc) + doc not runtime dependent - desktop file uses desktop-file-install Desktop file uses desktop-file-install, but the path to the icon is wrong: /usr/share/icons/weka.ico rather than just 1. weka (which is preferable) or 2. the correct path (/usr/share/icons/hicolor/yadda yadda) It looks like .ico files are not automatically picked up by GNOME's menu, so I'd consider converting the icon to .png (it makes it smaller as well), in which case you can just refer to it as Icon=weka. Otherwise, you'd have to use the complete path Also, icon caches are not updated: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache + clean buildroot before install ? filenames UTF-8 SHOULD + package build in mock on all architectures + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane + other subpackages should require versioned base + require package not files Java-specific: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java - Java requirement must be versioned (see BuildRequires and Requires) Otherwise, it looks fine, so I can approve this after the fixes are made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 20:45:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252045.n1PKjgFb015599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 --- Comment #6 from Jon Levell 2009-02-25 15:45:40 EDT --- Personally, I would have put the BR change in the changelog and bumped the release. Aside from that, I can't see any new issues - I'll go take a look at bashdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 20:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252049.n1PKnM66016442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #21 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 15:49:20 EDT --- package name: matches project name, ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok, but should it mentioned the idl license ? license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: needs to include the full src url buildable: ok buildrequires: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: ok directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok header files: ok static libraries: ok pkgconfig files: ok shared libs: ok devel package deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: ok file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok summary: - fix the source url -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252111.n1PLBWKN026560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 16:11:30 EDT --- mydns-1.2.8.25-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mydns-1.2.8.25-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252121.n1PLLOtZ029348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #22 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-02-25 16:21:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > > openchange-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/openchange/provision.py 0644 > openchange-python.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/openchange/__init__.py 0644 You get these errors when a file starts with "#!" but does not have executable permissions. To get rid of the rpmlint warnings I use: %{__sed} -i -r -e '/^#!/,1d' which will delete the first line if it starts with a "#!" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486865] Review Request: arptools - Collection of libnet and libpcap based ARP utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252132.n1PLW1Qd032343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486865 Jakub Hrozek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jakub Hrozek 2009-02-25 16:31:59 EDT --- Built for devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1177192 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487421] New: Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487421 Summary: Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jeckersb at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/libyaml/libyaml.spec SRPM URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/libyaml/libyaml-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package is needed as a build requirement for PyYAML's C bindings (I also maintain PyYAML). YAML is a data serialization format designed for human readability and interaction with scripting languages. LibYAML is a YAML parser and emitter written in C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252142.n1PLgWM6002608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #8 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-02-25 16:42:31 EDT --- My bad, I misread. With gtk2-devel, LXMusic build without problems (well, with some warnings). But is GTK2 needed to run LXMusic (all the information I find was confuse), if so it should be a dependency, isn't it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252146.n1PLkuHc003958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #63 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 16:46:51 EDT --- Latest (hopefully final) update. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/samba4.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-3.alpha6.fc10.src.rpm > summary: > - consider using %global I think I'll hold off on this until it's ratified and just convert all my packages en masse. > - add license comment Done. Simo said the library licenses are still subject to GPL/LGPL fluctuation, but everything else is GPL. > - consider cleaning up %defattr variation Done. > - fix -pidl conflicts Done, I think. Only conflicts I found were: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Parse/Yapp /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Parse/Yapp/Driver.pm I removed Samba's copy and added perl-Parse-Yapp as a build requirement. Were there any others? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 21:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252154.n1PLsp1c001277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-02-25 16:54:50 EDT --- No need to list gtk2 as a Requires:, rpm will pick up requirements for libraries automatically: $ rpm -qp --requires lxmusic-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm | grep gtk libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 $ rpm -q --whatprovides libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 gtk2-2.14.7-1.fc10.i386 $ So as you can see the package gets installed automatically (if it isn't already). If you have more questions, don't hesitate to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252209.n1PM9YjV009953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-25 17:09:33 EDT --- Thanks for the submission. Here's the review. Lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay: * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs X make sure lines are <= 80 characters - please add some line continuations to fix this * package successfully compiles and builds * BuildRequires are proper * macros fine * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * md5sum matches upstream - other than timestamp differences, my generated tarball matches * skim the summary and description for typos, etc. X summary and description good - please add Eclipse somewhere in the Summary. Something like "Eclipse plugin for OProfile". - please remove " (Incubation)" from the summary - remove "powerful" in the description. The description could also mention the CDT. * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used correctly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output $ rpmlint eclipse-oprofile-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm eclipse-oprofile.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 4) eclipse-oprofile.src: W: strange-permission eclipse-oprofile-fetch-src.sh 0775 Please fix both of these things. Just make the fetch script 644 or something and modify the instructions for generating the tarball to be: "sh ./eclipse-oprofile-fetch-src.sh". * changelog format okay * Summary tag does not end in a period * no PreReq * specfile is legible * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * one native bit has no rpath, static linking, etc. * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel necessary * install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no translations so no locale handling * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * file permissions fine * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * not a web app * package includes license text in the package and marks it with %doc * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output $ rpmlint eclipse-oprofile-* eclipse-oprofile.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/opcontrol eclipse-oprofile.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/opcontrol 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is fine 'cause it needs to be there for correct use of pam/consolehelper, right? * I verified that it installs and that the oprofile feature is available. Could you post a test project to try to verify that the functionallity works? I'm getting the OProfile view but not seeing any results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486961] Review Request: libservicelog - Servicelog Database and Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252228.n1PMSnlr014367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486961 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-02-25 17:28:47 EDT --- Also, what's the separate user used for - there's nothing obvious in this package that explains why it needs to be this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252250.n1PMoQUh019351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #17 from Bernard Johnson 2009-02-25 17:50:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > If we did include it, though, we would offer the same dual-/multi-licensing > options as the upstream tarball (and our "License: GPLv3+" tag may not be > explicit enough to signal our intent). And with that, somebody could choose to > accept the dual-licensing and would be bound to term 1.b.ii, which I think is a > problem, as for example, we don't do that for Fedora. Can I modify the EXCEPTIONS file to include this text at the top?: ============================================================================ NOTE: This file is included for reference reasons only. The Fedora project only offers this software under the GPLv3+ and MIT licenses. All files are GPLv3+ licenses, except the following files which are MIT licensed: src/exceptions/assert.c src/exceptions/AssertException.h If you wish to exercise the dual license, please obtain the sources from: http://www.tildeslash.com/libzdb/ ============================================================================= Seems like that would make it un-mistakable in conjunction with the package license tag. If I am not allowed to modify that file, then a README.Fedora is probably the best we can do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252253.n1PMre1A015141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-25 17:53:39 EDT --- I see no reason why you could not modify that file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486698] Review Request: fedora-setup-keyboard - Hal keyboard layout callout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252253.n1PMrKF8019857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486698 --- Comment #7 from Peter Hutterer 2009-02-25 17:53:19 EDT --- I'll add the conflicts line once the package is available and the xorg-x11-server package got its requires on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 22:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:57:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252257.n1PMvLHC016061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #64 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 17:57:18 EDT --- Were there any others? I think /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Parse is multiply owned. Not sure if thats intentional, or if there is some official owner. Easiest way out might be to Require perl(Parse::Yapp) - or do you pick that Requires up anyway ? The rest looks ok, so approved under the assumption that you have a Requires for an owner of that directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 23:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252320.n1PNKjoT021045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 --- Comment #7 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-02-25 18:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Personally, I would have put the BR change in the changelog and bumped the > release. Aside from that, I can't see any new issues - I'll go take a look at > bashdb I registered the BR change, but I kept the release. I do not like bumping releases when the changes are done in the same day. Bashdb has already been approved, but thanks anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 23:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:21:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252321.n1PNLq4l021373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 --- Comment #65 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 18:21:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) > I think /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Parse > > is multiply owned. Not sure if thats intentional, or if there is some official > owner. Easiest way out might be to Require perl(Parse::Yapp) - or do you pick > that Requires up anyway ? Not sure if build requirements get propagated as requirements with Perl modules. I'll just make it an explicit requirement, to be sure. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 23:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252329.n1PNTurd028102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #66 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 18:29:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: samba4 Short Description: Samba version 4 Owners: mbarnes Branches: InitialCC: simo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 25 23:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902252352.n1PNq2Lu000695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 --- Comment #6 from Aanjhan Ranganathan 2009-02-25 18:52:01 EDT --- Firstly, I updated the SPEC and SRPM for the latest upstream release which was done 4 days back. Will look into the warnings now. But in the meanwhile request a review of the update. http://tuxmaniac.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/skyeye.spec http://tuxmaniac.fedorapeople.org/skyeye-1.2.7-1.rc1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 00:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260008.n1Q08hHb031433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from David Lutterkort 2009-02-25 19:08:42 EDT --- based on the Koji scratch build in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1177393, a few minor things remain to be fixed: OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included FIX - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag OK - PreReq not used FIX - Source md5sum matches upstream No upstream release; make Source a URL to the download for the tarball OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient FIX - File permissions set properly rpmlint complains that /usr/share/doc/libvirt-qpid-0.2.12 and /usr/share/libvirt-qpid are mode 02755 OK - Macro usage is consistent FIX - rpmlint is silent See above warnings about directory perms OK - Proper debuginfo packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 00:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260007.n1Q07bPs003988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #23 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 19:07:35 EDT --- Source URL fixed. Updated license tag: the code is GPLv3+ not GPLv3, and the IDL license appears to be public domain. Most files under site-packages are executable, so I overrode the permissions on those Python files. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 00:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:15:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 454668] Review Request: gupnp-vala - vala bindings for gupnp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260015.n1Q0FicA005515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454668 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-25 19:15:43 EDT --- I've updated the package with the latest version. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gupnp-vala-0.5.3-1.fc10.src.rpm As this package is language bindings for a language that generates C code for compiling I don't believe the rpmlint output is really valid. The files included are all for development not running of apps. $ rpmlint /home/perobinson/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/gupnp-vala-0.5.3-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm gupnp-vala.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/gupnp-vala-1.0.pc gupnp-vala.x86_64: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 00:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486044] Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260023.n1Q0Nd2O001525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486044 --- Comment #2 from Bernard Johnson 2009-02-25 19:23:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > First Notes : > > - As optional deps are available it should be usefull to add it > Requires: php-pear(XML_Parser) php-pear(XML_Util) added > - I prefer the use of %{name}.xml rather than %{pear_name}.xml (see recent > change to PHP Guidelines, this will avoid conflict with package from other > channel) I did not find anything in the PHP guidelines, but I think I understand your intention. Please check and see if my updates to the package achieve this. > - A comment about running test-suite will be usefull > 14 PASSED TESTS > 0 SKIPPED TESTS > 2 FAILED TESTS: > Have you encounter and investigate this issue ? (at least, reported upstream) Two of the tests are badly written and fail. There is no problem with the functionality of the package. > > - %file must be fixed, should be > %{pear_phpdir}/Config* fixed Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/php-pear-Config.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/php-pear-Config-1.10.11-2.fc10.src.rpm * Wed Feb 25 2009 Bernard Johnson - 1.10.11-2 - add dependencies for php-pear(XML_Parser) and php-pear(XML_Util) - change from %%{pear_name}.xml to %%{name}.xml to avoid channel conflicts - changes %%files section from %%{pear_phpdir}/* to %%{pear_phpdir}/Config* - note regarding test suite failures added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 00:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260035.n1Q0ZO8R004394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 Bug 486561 depends on bug 486557, which changed state. Bug 486557 Summary: please update to 0.70 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486557 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 00:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260048.n1Q0mgmZ011843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #24 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 19:48:40 EDT --- Hmm, the libmapi-0.8-ROMULUS.tar.gz I get there differs from the one in your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 02:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474044] Review Request: libzdb - A small, fast, and easy to use database API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260201.n1Q21cGU027494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474044 --- Comment #19 from Bernard Johnson 2009-02-25 21:01:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/libzdb-2.4-2.fc10.src.rpm * Wed Feb 25 2009 Bernard Johnson - 2.4-2 - add a notice to EXCEPTIONS that dual licensing is not available in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 02:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260200.n1Q20n8M027244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #17 from Fernando Lopez-Lezcano 2009-02-25 21:00:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > From > my point of view of being a provenpackager (ueberpackager), comment #2 is > is useful and should be followed (the Epoch thing can be discussed maybe). Sorry for being late on commenting on this (dues to filtering problems I was not seeing email from bugzilla at redhat). Please consider keeping Epoch:1. This package is migrating from Planet CCRMA to Fedora. If the epoch is dropped current Planet CCRMA users will not see upgrades coming from Fedora, which would be really bad. _I_ am responsible for the epoch bump which happened a long time ago in the Planet CCRMA repositories. I can go to my logs if needed to try to find out why I did that, I take epochs seriously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 02:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487447] New: Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487447 Summary: Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy Product: Fedora Version: 5 Platform: All URL: http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Template_Flexy OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla_redhat at em.stonedrop.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Request to add PEAR package HTML_Template_Flexy to EPEL repository. Package is "An extremely powerful Tokenizer driven Template engine" and has been in "stable" release for a very long time. Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487448] New: Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy - PEAR HTML Template Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy - PEAR HTML Template Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487448 Summary: Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy - PEAR HTML Template Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla_redhat at em.stonedrop.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Template_Flexy SRPM URL: http://download.pear.php.net/package/HTML_Template_Flexy-1.3.4.tgz Description: Please review PEAR Package HTML_Template_Flexy for inclusion in EPEL. Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487449] New: Review Request: HTML_Javascript - PEAR interface for creating simple JS scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: HTML_Javascript - PEAR interface for creating simple JS scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487449 Summary: Review Request: HTML_Javascript - PEAR interface for creating simple JS scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla_redhat at em.stonedrop.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Javascript SRPM URL: http://download.pear.php.net/package/HTML_Javascript-1.1.1.tgz Description: Please review PEAR Package HTML_Javascript for inclusion in EPEL. Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487448] Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy - PEAR HTML Template Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260304.n1Q34q7M006881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487448 --- Comment #1 from Greg Waugh 2009-02-25 22:04:50 EDT --- *** Bug 487447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:04:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487447] Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260304.n1Q34p5a006860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487447 Greg Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Greg Waugh 2009-02-25 22:04:50 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 487448 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487450] New: Review Request: MDB2_Driver_mysqli - PEAR mysqli MDB2 driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: MDB2_Driver_mysqli - PEAR mysqli MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487450 Summary: Review Request: MDB2_Driver_mysqli - PEAR mysqli MDB2 driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla_redhat at em.stonedrop.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2_Driver_mysqli SRPM URL: http://download.pear.php.net/package/MDB2_Driver_mysqli-1.4.1.tgz Description: Please review PEAR Package MDB2_Driver_mysqli for inclusion in EPEL. Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487451] New: Review Request: PEAR Auth - PEAR authentication system base class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PEAR Auth - PEAR authentication system base class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487451 Summary: Review Request: PEAR Auth - PEAR authentication system base class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla_redhat at em.stonedrop.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pear.php.net/package/Auth SRPM URL: http://download.pear.php.net/package/Auth-1.6.1.tgz Description: Please review PEAR Package Auth for inclusion in EPEL. Many thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:13:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260313.n1Q3DmQl003707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_not | |e+ --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 22:13:47 EDT --- We should probably release-note this: The Preferences menu does no longer have submenus. This change was done since deep menu hierarchies are difficult to navigate for many users, and the category-based submenus were not terribly obvious. If you are used to the submenus, and prefer to keep the Peferences menu organized in this way, install the preferences-menus package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487451] Review Request: PEAR Auth - PEAR authentication system base class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260319.n1Q3JRKM010489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487451 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-25 22:19:26 EDT --- I'm confused; the Spec URL isn't a link to a spec file, and the SRPM URL is a link to a tarball, not a source RPM. If you're submitting a package for review, please provide a link to a spec file and source RPM so that someone can review it. If you are asking for someone else to package this software, this isn't really the proper way to ask, because we expect both a complete package ready to review and a maintainer willing to maintain it going forward. Instead, please add the software to the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487450] Review Request: MDB2_Driver_mysqli - PEAR mysqli MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260326.n1Q3Qa0d007471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487450 Greg Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:24:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260324.n1Q3OG1b006640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 --- Comment #17 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-25 22:24:14 EDT --- Fixed SPEC: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement.spec Fixed SRPM: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kde-plasma-networkmanagement/kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.6.20090217svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487449] Review Request: HTML_Javascript - PEAR interface for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260326.n1Q3QLE4007385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487449 Greg Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487451] Review Request: PEAR Auth - PEAR authentication system base class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260325.n1Q3PZ9G007112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487451 Greg Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Greg Waugh 2009-02-25 22:25:34 EDT --- Thanks. I will do it that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487448] Review Request: HTML_Template_Flexy - PEAR HTML Template Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260326.n1Q3Q18e012581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487448 Greg Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260325.n1Q3P7VY012345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 --- Comment #25 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-25 22:25:05 EDT --- That's strange, I don't remember where I got the original tarball. But anyway I rebuilt with the one from SourceForge. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/openchange.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/openchange-0.8-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484159] Review Request: git-cola - A highly caffeinated git gui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260325.n1Q3P4i6012258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484159 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-25 22:25:02 EDT --- Since it's in CVS and released, I'll close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260327.n1Q3RAC5012855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:41:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260341.n1Q3f4TQ016217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-25 22:41:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I've added the versioned requires, add a comment and even did the -p. > OK. > Then, I've queried upstream (myself), but upstream said no. Nice comment. > > New files in the same location. thanks. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1182091 + rpmlint is Not silent but ok to accept. preferences-menus.noarch: W: no-documentation preferences-menus.noarch: W: no-url-tag + Rest looks following packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260342.n1Q3g7Er016502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #13 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 22:42:06 EDT --- Builds ok in mock rpmlint output: evolution-mapi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 03:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260355.n1Q3tHMA014075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 22:55:16 EDT --- Loooking around the provides and requires a bit, I think it would be good to have explicit requires against evolution and e-d-s (since they own /usr/lib/evolution/2.26/plugins and /usr/lib/evolution-data-server-1.2/extension). They _are_ currently pulled in by library dependencies, but thats not very obvious (evo seems to get pulled in via libeutil ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487421] Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260403.n1Q43a4a015768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487421 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-25 23:03:35 EDT --- You can drop files README LICENSE as %doc from -devel as libyaml already installs them. Any reason to include -static package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:16:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483301] Review Request: muse - Midi/Audio Music Sequencer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260416.n1Q4GoKU023467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483301 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-25 23:16:48 EDT --- Fernando, The bug was reopened in bug# 484591 because of some, uhm... some issues and got accepted. We kept the Epoch: 1 as is, so no need to worry. Additionally, I included you as the co-owner of this package. You should have CVS access to it now. Here is the web interface for CVS browsing: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/muse/ and here is the package database info: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/muse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260436.n1Q4asCO027206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #15 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 23:36:52 EDT --- formal review package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field/file: the license field says GPLv2+, but COPYING is GPLv3. What gives ? spec language: ok spec legible: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: ok build deps: ok locale handling: ok, but I don't know what that extra grep business is about. Shouldn't be necessary ? ldconfig: ok relocatable: ok directory ownership: ok, but see earlier comment about deps duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok header files: ok static libs: ok pkgconfig files: ok shared libs: ok devel dep: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: ok file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok summary: - clarify license - consider getting rid of grep business around %find_lang - consider adding explicit deps for evo/eds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260442.n1Q4gh0D023144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 23:42:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: preferences-menus Short Description: Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 04:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260445.n1Q4jUbS023740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-25 23:45:29 EDT --- Looks good now. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 07:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260705.n1Q75DgF018912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 02:05:12 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 07:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260706.n1Q76Was023753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 02:06:31 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.6-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-0.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 07:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260728.n1Q7SYLM023416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #12 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-02-26 02:28:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Why do you use > install modules/%{peclName}.so %{buildroot}%{php_extdir} > > Rather than (which also create the destination dir) > make install INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT I do not remember now. It have any sense? > Doesn't build for me : > - %doc %{peclName}-%{version}/README > + %doc %{peclName}/README Thank you. Fixed. > rpmlint : > php-pecl-runkit.src: I: checking > php-pecl-runkit.src:39: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes php-pear-%{peclName} > php-pecl-runkit.src: W: summary-not-capitalized runkit - mangle with user > defined functions and classes Name deleteed from all summary and capitalized. > php-pecl-runkit.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Languages/PHP Changed to Development/Libraries > php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: I: checking > php-pecl-runkit.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized runkit - mangle with user > defined functions and classes Fixed, see before. > - stuff php-pear-%{peclName} is not usefull in Fedora (php-pear-runkit don't > exists AFAIK) Excuse me, I think do not understand you. You speak about unnecessary Obsoletes: php-pear-%{peclName}? I think you are rigth, it may be safely removed in this case. I do it. rpmlint silent now. I am sorry that is not checked immediately. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/php-pecl-runkit/php-pecl-runkit-0.9-8.CVS20090215.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 07:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260733.n1Q7Xnon029054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev 2009-02-26 02:33:48 EDT --- Hm, It build successful on my box, but failed unexpected in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1183646&name=build.log As seen in log, macros %{pecl_xmldir} not replaced by it own value. Strange. More strange in this situation what php-pecl-imagick package also uses it macros and therefor built correctly... Until now I don't known what to do... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 07:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260746.n1Q7kB5a031573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-26 02:46:10 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1185653 ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 08:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260818.n1Q8IMCM000600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-02-26 03:18:21 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK* BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, correct scriptlets exists BAD owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. Ok file permissions are appropriate. BAD scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK* no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. BAD not a GUI app - full URL to source archive is missing - no need to specify License in all sub-packages, it is inherited from the main package - parallel make is not used (use make %{?_smp_mflags}) - when you decide to create a -devel subpackage, then you must move the libraries from the main package to a -libs sub-package to be multilib compliant - use %{_initddir} instead of /etc/rc.d/init.d - no need to specify BR: glib2-devel, it is resolved automatically via gtkmm24-devel - rpmlint complains a bit crash-catcher.x86_64: W: no-documentation => mark COPYING and README as %doc crash-catcher.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libUtils.so crash-catcher.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libMiddleWare.so => you probably want a devel subpackage crash-catcher.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/crash-catcher crash-catcher.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/crash-catcher => remove %config from the initsctript crash-catcher.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/crash-catcher ['/usr/lib64'] crash-catcher.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libMiddleWare.so.0.0.1 ['/usr/lib64'] crash-catcher-addon-ccpp.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/hookCCpp ['/usr/lib64'] => http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Removing_Rpath crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/crash-catcher/CCMainWindow.py 0644 crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/crash-catcher/CCDBusBackend.py 0644 => drop the shebang lines from the scrips, they are not intended to be run on their own crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/cc-gui => add it crash-catcher-addon-ccpp.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-applet.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-plugin-logger.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-plugin-mailx.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-plugin-sqlite3.x86_64: W: no-documentation => can be ignored now crash-catcher-plugin-mailx.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long => fix crash-catcher-addon-ccpp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libCCpp.so crash-catcher-plugin-logger.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libLogger.so crash-catcher-plugin-mailx.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libMailx.so crash-catcher-plugin-sqlite3.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libSQLite3.so => link plugins with "-avoid-version" in LDFLAGS, then it is ok to have *.so in a non-devel package - unowned directories: %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/plugins %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name} first 3 should be owned by the main package, the last one by the -gui sub-package - the preun scriptlet controls rarpd - plugins are usually linked with "-avoid-version" in LDFLAGS - desktop file is missing for the gui -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 09:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485052] Review Request: mingw32-crossreport - Analysis tool to help cross-compilation to Windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902260929.n1Q9T3JL015830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485052 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-26 04:29:01 EDT --- This is all in Fedora now, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 10:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261020.n1QAKh4u026730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #32 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-26 05:20:41 EDT --- Hi Anithra, Will you close the bug as the plugin is in repos? Thanks, Alexander Kurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 10:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261022.n1QAMXOJ027179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-26 05:22:31 EDT --- Elliott, You builded the plugin in rawhide so will you close the bug? Thanks, Alexander Kurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 10:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261040.n1QAeeNw031071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #13 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-26 05:40:38 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream: c69db6265da59079263043dc5f5540e67f6d35cabed54016a17a5e82f31326d2 slim-2.6.1b.tgz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary a short and concise description. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is sane. NOT OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. OK license text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint has acceptable warnings. OK final provides and requires are sane: slimdata-2.6.1b-4.fc11.x86_64.rpm libslim.so.0()(64bit) slimdata = 2.6.1b-4.fc11 slimdata(x86-64) = 2.6.1b-4.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libslim.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) slimdata-devel-2.6.1b-4.fc11.x86_64.rpm slimdata-devel = 2.6.1b-4.fc11 slimdata-devel(x86-64) = 2.6.1b-4.fc11 = libslim.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig slimdata = 2.6.1b-4.fc11 OK %check is present and all tests pass: Running compression data-type tests on /tmp/data_partial.bin (size 1000000)... ...Passed all 8 data-type tests Running compression tests on /tmp/data_partial.bin (size 1000000)... ...Passed all 16 compression tests Running expansion tests on /tmp/data_partial.bin (size 1000000)... ...Passed all 17 expansion tests Running compression data-type tests on /tmp/data_partial.bin (size 1000003)... ...Passed all 8 data-type tests Running compression data-type tests on /tmp/data_partial.bin (size 524289)... ...Passed all 8 data-type tests Running compression data-type tests on /tmp/data_partial.bin (size 524287)... ...Passed all 8 data-type tests Running compression data-type tests on /tmp/fake_test_data.bin (size 20000000)... ...Passed all 8 data-type tests Running compression tests on /tmp/fake_test_data.bin (size 20000000)... ...Passed all 16 compression tests Running expansion tests on /tmp/fake_test_data.bin (size 20000000)... ...Passed all 2 expansion tests OK shared libraries are present, ldconfig called properly OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers are in a separate -devel package. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Blocker: License field should be GPL+ Suggestions: please consider preserving timestamps of installed files (adding INSTALL="install -p" to make install target in %install section) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 11:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487094] Review Request: stp - Constraint solver/decision procedure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261128.n1QBSoru008954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487094 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-26 06:28:49 EDT --- OK Rpmlint must be run on every package. OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Usually are all packages and subpackages on the top of spec and check part is placed before %files. This is little confusing. It's better to use macro for release version 0.1-11-18-2008 for future updates. Also you don't have to create doc for devel package, it the base package includes them and it's required by devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 12:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261248.n1QCmHLR025530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 --- Comment #2 from Phil Knirsch 2009-02-26 07:48:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Hm, I wonder why there is a devel-dependency for kernel-debuginfo. I see that > the scripts are systemtap scripts. Therefore this should be OK. > Yea, i was wondering about that as well. Seems that rpmlint assumes that if you install a debuginfo package you want to to development instead of debugging. ;) > Packaging guidelines: > > Can you please fix the URL for the git tree to be consistent and maybe add a > description how to get the proper version from git? Please also fix the url in > the wiki page. (See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL) > Added the following over the Source tag: # The source for this package was pulled from upstream git. Use the # following commands to get the corresponding tarball: # git clone git://fedorapeople.org/~pknirsch/tuned.git/ # cd tuned # git checkout v%{version} # make archive (similar to the upstream CVS description in the SourceURL docu) > Can you please use "%(mktemp -ud > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)" for Buildroot? (See: > BuildRoot tag at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) > Fixed. > Please fix whitespaces in the GPL headers (example: tuned). > Fixed. > Why is tuningplugins/__init__.py empty? > Intentionally left empty. ;) But in all seriousness, Python packages require you to install at least an empty __init__.py to work, see http://docs.python.org/tutorial/modules.html#packages. I've added a comment line to both __init__.py files now. > Why is there a reference to configure in INSTALL. There is no configure script > at all. Uhm, yea, thats was just the standard GNU INSTALL file. I've stripped it down "a little" now so it only contains what really can be done. New packages are now up: Spec URL: http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned.spec SRPM URL: http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 12:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261251.n1QCp8PA031268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 07:51:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openchange Short Description: Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols Owners: mbarnes Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 13:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487421] Review Request: libyaml - YAML 1.1 parser and emitter written in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261315.n1QDFOZe004388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487421 --- Comment #2 from John Eckersberg 2009-02-26 08:15:23 EDT --- I modelled my spec after libxml2, which split static out into it's own package. It really doesn't matter to me, so I'll just move it into the -devel package. Updated: Spec URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/libyaml/libyaml.spec SRPM URL: http://jeckersb.fedorapeople.org/libyaml/libyaml-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for looking at this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 13:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487507] New: Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487507 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array/perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array/perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The module implements fast XS accessors both for getting at and setting an object attribute. Additionally, the module supports mutators and simple predicates (has_foo() like tests for definedness of an attributes). The module works only with objects that are implemented as arrays. Using it on hash-based objects is bound to make your life miserable. Refer to Class::XSAccessor for an implementation that works with hash-based objects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 13:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487507] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261336.n1QDaZv4003604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487507 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 13:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487507] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261348.n1QDm707006012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487507 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-26 08:48:06 EDT --- package build failed. koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1190374 Suggestions: 1) You don't need following in SPEC Requires: perl(AutoXS::Header) >= 0.02 2) Missing BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487507] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261408.n1QE8cOS016127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487507 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-26 09:08:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > package build failed. > koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1190374 > > Suggestions: > 1) You don't need following in SPEC > Requires: perl(AutoXS::Header) >= 0.02 > Did you mean BR? It fails without it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1190561&name=build.log > 2) Missing > BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Added. Thanks. New koji build could be found at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1190611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261413.n1QEDW26017280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479895] Review Request: perl-DDL-Oracle - DDL generator for Oracle databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261413.n1QED6s6017201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479895 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261422.n1QEMTAk014662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483205] Review Request: eclipse-systemtapgui - GUI interface for SystemTap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261428.n1QEStxb016287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483205 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261435.n1QEZmXM018102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 Aristeu Rozanski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Aristeu Rozanski 2009-02-26 09:35:44 EDT --- The package is in. closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261432.n1QEWI72022199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 09:32:17 EDT --- bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261432.n1QEWNMr022238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 09:32:22 EDT --- bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:46:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:46:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487521] New: Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Summary: Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pypar.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pypar-2.1.0_53-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Pypar is an efficient but easy-to-use module that allows programs written in Python to run in parallel on multiple processors and communicate using message passing. Pypar provides bindings to a subset of the message passing interface standard MPI. rpmlint output: pypar.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/mandelbrot_example/mandelplot_ext.c pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/demo3.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pypar/test_init.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pypar/network_timing.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/demo.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/demo4.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pypar/test_pypar.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/mandelbrot_example/mandel_sequential.py 0644 pypar.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/mandelbrot_example/mandel_ext.c pypar.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pypar-2.1.0_53/demos/demo2.py 0644 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 2 warnings. Contacted upstream to fix the non-executable-script errors. devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings should not cause any concern, since they are demo files for using the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261446.n1QEkskV026340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #14 from Matthew Truch 2009-02-26 09:46:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > > Blocker: License field should be GPL+ The included license is GPLv3, and most of the source files don't have a copyright/license notice. Is this from the src/crc.h which includes code from gzip 1.2.4 and has a license notice? Downloading gzip 1.2.4 indicates that it is covered by GPLv2. I guess this is a little more ambiguous than I thought. I have contacted upstream about this so they can properly clarify what they want. > Suggestions: please consider preserving timestamps of installed files (adding > INSTALL="install -p" to make install target in %install section) Timestamps are preserved already with install -p; for example, see the build log from my most recent koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1159537&name=build.log Are you seeing a situation where install is called without the -p flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:51:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261451.n1QEpLnB022289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-02-26 09:51:19 EDT --- Let me know when you are ready to continue this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 14:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261453.n1QErIRK022836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cristian.balint at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-02-26 09:53:17 EDT --- Let me know when you are ready to proceed with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485941] Review Request: eclipse-valgrind - Eclipse Valgrind Integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261503.n1QF3USm025520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485941 Elliott Baron changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Elliott Baron 2009-02-26 10:03:28 EDT --- Completed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261504.n1QF4HS4025624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Dave Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261502.n1QF2G0G030837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #15 from Lucian Langa 2009-02-26 10:02:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > The included license is GPLv3, and most of the source files don't have a > copyright/license notice. Is this from the src/crc.h which includes code from > gzip 1.2.4 and has a license notice? No. Paragraph 9 of COPYING: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing says: "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include." > I have contacted upstream about this so they can properly clarify what they > want. The best way is to contact upstream to ask the version of the license and add headers to source files or perhaps state this in README file. > Timestamps are preserved already with install -p; for example, see the build > log from my most recent koji scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1159537&name=build.log > Are you seeing a situation where install is called without the -p flag? you're right disregard this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261514.n1QFEtDw001336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 Thomas Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pknirsch at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Thomas Woerner 2009-02-26 10:14:53 EDT --- MUST Items ---------- [WARN] rpmlint output $ rpmlint tuned-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint tuned-0.1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm tuned.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/tuned $prog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [OK] The warning here can be ignored, it is not incoherent, because $prog contains the correct value. $ rpmlint tuned-utils-0.1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm tuned-utils.noarch: W: no-documentation tuned-utils.noarch: E: devel-dependency kernel-debuginfo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [WARN] There is no description for the utils package. [OK] The error can be ignored, the kernel-debuginfo package is requires to use systemtap. [OK] Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [OK] The spec file name must match the base package. [FAIL/INFO] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. FAIL: The description is not more than the summary. Please add some more information maybe on how it is working or how it should be used. INFO: There is a README and README.txt. What is the difference? [OK] Meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv2+). [OK] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [OK] License file included in %doc. [OK] Spec file written in American English. [OK] Spec file is legible. [OK] Source matches upstream. [OK] Package successfully compiles and builds at least one primary architecture. [OK] No build dependencies. [OK] No localized files, therefore no locale support needed. [OK] No schared libs, therefore no ldconfig needed. [OK] Not relocatable. [OK] Package ownes all directories it creates. [OK] Does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [OK] Permissions on files are set properly. [OK] Has a correct %clean section. [OK] Macros consistently used. [OK] Code or permissible content. [OK] No large documentation files, therefore no -doc subpackage needed. [OK] %doc files don't affect runtime. [OK] No header files and no libraries, therefore no -devel subpackage needed. [OK] No static libs, therefore no -static subpackage needed. [OK] No pkgconfig file, therefore no requires for pkgconfig needed. [OK] No GUI applications, therefore no %{name}.desktop file needed. [OK] Does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [OK] Cleanup at the beginning of %install. [OK] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items ------------ [OK] License file included. [BAD] No translations for Non-English languages. [OK] Builds in mock. [OK] Should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [BAD] Package functions as described: Not enough information for this. [OK] Scriptlets seem to be sane. [OK] No -devel subpackage, therefore no requirement for base package needed. [OK] -utils subpackage is independent, therefore no requirement for base package needed. [OK] No pkgconfig files, therefore no placement needed. [OK] No file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261535.n1QFZFJI001787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 10:35:14 EDT --- netactview-0.4.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261535.n1QFZK2p001869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.1-2.fc10 |0.4.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261532.n1QFWcUX006493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261532.n1QFWXQd006427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 10:32:31 EDT --- netactview-0.4.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261535.n1QFZfvK001946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 10:35:40 EDT --- mydns-1.2.8.25-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mydns'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2135 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487527] New: Review Request: watchdog - Software and/or Hardware watchdog daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: watchdog - Software and/or Hardware watchdog daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487527 Summary: Review Request: watchdog - Software and/or Hardware watchdog daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/watchdog.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/watchdog-5.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Software and/or Hardware watchdog daemon rpmlint gives the following warnings, which I think are OK because these shell scripts ought to be executable: watchdog.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/watchdog-5.5/examples/repair.sh watchdog.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/watchdog-5.5/examples/uptime.sh watchdog.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/watchdog-5.5/examples/dbcheck.sh Koji scratch build in dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1191591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 15:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261543.n1QFh7vG009082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Anithra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 16:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261601.n1QG1l2Q009089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #16 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 11:01:45 EDT --- Got clarification from upstream that the correct license is LGPLv2+ and the COPYING file is apparently wrong (and so is my spec file). But there's also a COPYING.LGPL2 and COPYING.LGPL3 in the SVN repo which isn't included in the tarball. *confusion* Novell promised to clarify the license in the next release. So can we mark it as the -intended- license, and I'll make sure it gets fixed? The grep thing I must have copy-n-pasted from another package. It's gone now. http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SPECS/evolution-mapi.spec http://mbarnes.fedorapeople.org/mapi/SRPMS/evolution-mapi-0.25.91-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 16:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261609.n1QG9GCe010546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #2 from Kent Sebastian 2009-02-26 11:09:15 EDT --- Updated spec and srpm uploaded (same url). >X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - please add some line continuations to fix this for some lines this introduces errors, eg: %define corepath %{buildroot}%{install_loc}/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.linuxtools.oprofile.core_%{ver_qual} can not be split. For others (eg: very long paths) it seems to harm readability, but other than that line continuations added where possible. >X summary and description good > - please add Eclipse somewhere in the Summary. Something like "Eclipse Fixed. >X rpmlint on .srpm gives no output Fixed. >This is fine 'cause it needs to be there for correct use of pam/consolehelper, >right? Indeed, they are not config files per-se, since there is no configuration to be done by the user. Once placed there they never need to be touched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 16:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487535] New: Review Request: bltk - Baterry Life Tool Kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bltk - Baterry Life Tool Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487535 Summary: Review Request: bltk - Baterry Life Tool Kit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jskala at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jskala/bltk/devel/bltk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jskala/bltk/devel/bltk-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: I've just done packaging up bltk and I'd like ask for a review so that I can get it into Fedora Extras. The Battery Life Tool Kit is used to measure battery life and performance under different workloads on Linux. Test can be used with various workloads to simulate different types of laptop usage (idle, office, reader, player, developer, game). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 16:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486044] Review Request: php-pear-Config -Configuration file manipulation for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261637.n1QGbdwJ017750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486044 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-02-26 11:37:38 EDT --- > Two of the tests are badly written and fail. There is no problem with the > functionality of the package. This should be reported upstream REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-pear-Config.src: I: checking php-pear-Config.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name + spec file name + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + no license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources ec85ece7ddd28a0a139c0699481c0116 Config-1.10.11.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + test suite : see previous comment + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(PEAR) php-pear(XML_Parser) php-pear(XML_Util) + Final Provides ok php-pear(Config) = 1.10.11 php-pear-Config = 1.10.11-2.fc8 php-pear(PEAR) should be removed from Requires as already required by php-pear(XML_Parser) and php-pear(XML_Util) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 16:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261639.n1QGd8xW022706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-26 11:39:06 EDT --- Thanks. I've verified that the rpmlint issues are gone and the line length stuff is fixed. My only remaining nit is the description: please include the CDT somehow and drop the "powerful". Something like "... profiling capabilities with the CDT." Otherwise, we're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261710.n1QHAiMJ026348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-02-26 12:10:38 EDT --- any news ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261725.n1QHPUwF002271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Matthias Clasen 2009-02-26 12:25:29 EDT --- > Novell promised to clarify the license in the next release. So can we mark it > as the -intended- license, and I'll make sure it gets fixed? Sounds good enough to me. And ship no license file then, instead of the wrong license file, I guess. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:29:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261729.n1QHT9uO029826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Paul Lange 2009-02-26 12:29:07 EDT --- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. webkit-sharp.i386: E: no-binary webkit-sharp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Errors can be ignored. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK - i386 - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ############################################################ Monodoc is excluded until we figured out how to handle docs right. One thing I noticed it that version of the package is 0.2. But in mono/gac the version of the assembly is 1.0.0.0. But I think this is an upstream issue. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261735.n1QHZPkH003940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #72 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-26 12:35:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ETL Short Description: Extended Template Library Owners: lkundrak (anyone who wants to comaintiain this, feel free to opt in) Branches: EL-5 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487312] Review Request: tuned - A dynamic adaptive system tuning daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261743.n1QHhKhU032751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312 Phil Knirsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pknirsch at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Phil Knirsch 2009-02-26 12:43:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > MUST Items > ---------- > > [OK] Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > [OK] The spec file name must match the base package. > [FAIL/INFO] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > > FAIL: The description is not more than the summary. Please add some more > information maybe on how it is working or how it should be used. > INFO: There is a README and README.txt. What is the difference? > Extended the description of both the main and the utils package to contain more useful information about the packages. Also renamed the README.txt to DESIGN.txt as it is a rough draft of the design of the tuned. > > SHOULD Items > ------------ > > [OK] License file included. > [BAD] No translations for Non-English languages. Will come in a future version. > [BAD] Package functions as described: Not enough information for this. Extended the README and the tuned manpage, added a tuned.conf manpage and added a README.utils that describes in detail what the systemtap scripts do. Thanks a lot for the review so far! Regards, Phil New packages are now up: Spec URL: http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned.spec SRPM URL: http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261752.n1QHqYcf002159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-26 12:52:32 EDT --- Thanks Marcela! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grin Short Description: Grep-like tool for source code Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 17:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261759.n1QHxc2c008379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 12:59:36 EDT --- Thanks again for the reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 18:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261800.n1QI0pSF009047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 13:00:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: evolution-mapi Short Description: Exchange 2007 support for Evolution Owners: mbarnes Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 18:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261847.n1QIlKiL014317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen 2009-02-26 13:47:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: webkit-sharp Short Description: .NET bindings for WebKit Owners: dnielsen Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 18:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261855.n1QIt5Dk016119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson 2009-02-26 13:55:04 EDT --- Here's an updated .src.rpm with fixes for all issues identified by the review. The code fixes are implemented as a patch, which obviously the crash-catcher guys should apply to the code in trac rather than keeping as a patch. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 18:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261855.n1QItiR7021728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson 2009-02-26 13:55:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333368) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333368) Fixed crash-catcher package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 18:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261856.n1QIuni1021837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 --- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson 2009-02-26 13:56:48 EDT --- Oh, except obviously I couldn't fix the tarball location as I'm not a crash-catcher developer :) You guys need to put a download section on the site and put the tarball there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 19:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487392] Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261906.n1QJ6hGI024550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392 --- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson 2009-02-26 14:06:42 EDT --- sorry, one more thing - remove 'autoreconf' from the spec once the patch is applied upstream, it's only needed while the patch is touching a Makefile.am. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 19:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902261935.n1QJZ5iw025320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-26 14:35:04 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262007.n1QK79w9005276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 --- Comment #15 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-26 15:07:07 EDT --- I'm very unhappy with it... %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc CHANGES COPYING CREDITS README %{_libdir}/*.so.* %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc HACKING docs/doxygen/html %{_includedir}/* %{_libdir}/*.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}* %files tools %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_bindir}/wps2* this is imho shorter and easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262012.n1QKC5RQ001051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-02-26 15:12:04 EDT --- the package worksm, but the domain is incorrect. i will correct this in the next issue-killing session -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262013.n1QKDSqU001290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #25 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-26 15:13:26 EDT --- Marek, MegaUpload rapidly changes captchas these days, so this no longer works. And are you sure this is a build-time dependency: BuildRequires: tesseract Hint: It's not. And probably also this: BuildRequires: python-imaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262046.n1QKkCeC014805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #4 from Kent Sebastian 2009-02-26 15:46:11 EDT --- > My only remaining nit is the description: please include the > CDT somehow and drop the "powerful". Something like "... profiling > capabilities with the CDT." Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262048.n1QKmopP009809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #26 from Marek Mahut 2009-02-26 15:48:48 EDT --- I know about the captcha, upstream is working on that, many users complains that it's not even human readable and I've bought a premium account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262050.n1QKoZLE015800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-26 15:50:34 EDT --- Thanks. This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 20:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262052.n1QKqOQb016167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-26 15:52:23 EDT --- Kent, please follow the procedure here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process which, as a next step has you follow this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262100.n1QL0MFM017766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #27 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-26 16:00:21 EDT --- "Let's wait some time." [1] doesn't sound like upstream is working on that. Seriously, are they waiting for megaupload to replace captcha with a machine-readable one? Why would they do that? [1] http://code.google.com/p/plowshare/issues/detail?id=6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487587] New: Review Request: debuginfofs - network-mountable filesystem for debuginfo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: debuginfofs - network-mountable filesystem for debuginfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487587 Summary: Review Request: debuginfofs - network-mountable filesystem for debuginfo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wwoods at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/debuginfofs.spec SRPM URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/debuginfofs-0.1-0.fc10.src.rpm Description: debuginfofs is a network-mountable filesystem that provides the debugging symbols needed to generate a fully annotated backtrace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262136.n1QLasxl021106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 16:36:53 EDT --- flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262139.n1QLd5C2021481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 16:39:04 EDT --- flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262141.n1QLfYQJ022154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Kent Sebastian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kent Sebastian 2009-02-26 16:41:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-oprofile Short Description: Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration Owners: ksebasti Branches: F-10 InitialCC: overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262148.n1QLmfok028799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 --- Comment #2 from Paul Lange 2009-02-26 16:48:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333395) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333395) openSuse patch I found this patch in the openSuse package. Could you please investigate if we should include it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 21:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:53:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262153.n1QLrjof029833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Jon Levell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jon Levell 2009-02-26 16:53:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: diffuse Short Description: Graphical tool for comparing and merging text files Owners: jonquark Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 22:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262200.n1QM04vT031262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 --- Comment #3 from David Nielsen 2009-02-26 17:00:02 EDT --- This is upstream and fixes a real bug (well actually it works around some Firefox strangeness) http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/trunk/monsoon/Monsoon/TorrentController.cs?r1=125266&r2=127458 As such I would be willing to carry it in the package, I will add it along with any review changes or at import time. It can go away with the next release so the workload is acceptable and the user experience is improved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 22:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262220.n1QMKDLI030868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |palango at gmx.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |palango at gmx.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Paul Lange 2009-02-26 17:20:11 EDT --- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. monsoon.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/monsoon-0.20/COPYING monsoon.i386: E: no-binary monsoon.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Errors can be ignored but please see if you cansolve the warning. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - 1530450ee43d6103c063ea7d940854a9 - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK - i386 - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. FAIL - use of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ############################################################ Some things left before you can upload the package in CVS: - Please correct the Url in URL field. - Please use %{buildroot} consistently (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) - Please add the patch. This are the only things left. I'm sure you going to correct this issues even if I approve it now. So: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 22:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262217.n1QMHiFI002915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 Jon Levell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at coralbark.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Levell 2009-02-26 17:17:42 EDT --- Ok... package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 22:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262230.n1QMUKCW005461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen 2009-02-26 17:30:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: monsoon Short Description: Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# Owners: dnielsen Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 22:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262237.n1QMbV8H007019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Jon Levell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at coralbark.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jon Levell 2009-02-26 17:37:29 EDT --- OK... the changes look good. I'll approve the package. I see that you need a sponsor. I've only just been sponsored myself but if you carry out a couple of package reviews: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines (or submit other packages for review) and link to them here then I'll sponsor you. (Michael who sponsored me is still cc'd to this bug so I suspect/hope he'll keep an eye out that I don't make any huge blunders) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 22:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262259.n1QMxMvG011263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #11 from David Lutterkort 2009-02-26 17:59:20 EDT --- APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. SRPM/spec file at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1193621 Minor nits: * the version for the last changelog entry is incorrect (makes rpmlint complain) * rather than using %defattr and %attr, fix the build process of libvirt-qpid to give files the correct permissions * since you're also upstream, please put up a page with downloads of official releases so that people can independently verify that the sources are really what they ought to be (would also be a good idea to tag releases in git for the morbidly curious) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 23:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226241] Merge Review: perl-Bit-Vector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262335.n1QNZSE2014626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226241 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-26 18:35:27 EDT --- Closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 23:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226242] Merge Review: perl-BSD-Resource In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262339.n1QNdvlZ019768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226242 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-26 18:39:55 EDT --- Closing... (merge review with fedora-review+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 23:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226260] Merge Review: perl-HTML-Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262340.n1QNe1GD019807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226260 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-26 18:40:00 EDT --- Closing... (merge review with fedora-review+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 23:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226261] Merge Review: perl-HTML-Tagset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262340.n1QNe3NK019833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226261 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-26 18:40:01 EDT --- Closing... (merge review with fedora-review+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 23:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226271] Merge Review: perl-Net-IP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262340.n1QNe9uY019906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226271 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-26 18:40:08 EDT --- Closing... (merge review with fedora-review+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 26 23:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226254] Merge Review: perl-Devel-Symdump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902262340.n1QNe0It019783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226254 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-26 18:39:57 EDT --- Closing... (merge review with fedora-review+) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 195420] Review Request: clips - Tools for developing expert systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270004.n1R04PwY019872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195420 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:04:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270005.n1R05sXO020118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:05:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487263] Review request: preferences-menus - Categorized submenus for the Preferences menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270009.n1R09eLb020886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487263 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:09:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480859] Review Request: diffuse - graphical diff tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270012.n1R0CXPY021623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480859 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:12:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270014.n1R0E55Z021788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:14:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270016.n1R0GJl0026982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:16:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:19:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270019.n1R0JZO4022730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:19:34 EDT --- Kent: I don't see you in the packager group. Is this your first package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:21:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484598] Review Request: grin - Grep-like tool for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270021.n1R0LZ7Z023328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:21:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270020.n1R0Kh5I027858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:20:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270017.n1R0HoaG027191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:17:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462521] Review Request: simplyhtml - Application and a java component for rich text processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270022.n1R0Mkr7023633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462521 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:22:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270026.n1R0QhxW024458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #73 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:26:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270029.n1R0T5TR025030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:29:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270030.n1R0U3SE025265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:29:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270031.n1R0VBwu030094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #67 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:31:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270027.n1R0Rtld029308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-26 19:27:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270101.n1R11lib032115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 20:01:46 EDT --- webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 00:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484202] Review Request: perl-Test-JSON - Test JSON data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270057.n1R0vqSf031156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484202 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270102.n1R124HQ004415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 20:02:02 EDT --- webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270111.n1R1B7Xa006305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from David Nielsen 2009-02-26 20:11:03 EDT --- webkit-sharp should be in the next rawhide update -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487617] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487617 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-ISO8601 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Parses almost all ISO8601 date and time formats. ISO8601 time-intervals will be supported in a later release. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1199557 *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270118.n1R1IGgU007960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-26 20:18:14 EDT --- Kent: I'll sponsor you. Read the instructions here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270125.n1R1PvpR004596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #3 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-26 20:25:55 EDT --- * Wed Feb 27 2009 Milos Jakubicek - 3.6.0-2 - Running gtk-update-icon-cache - Converting icon to png, added BR:ImageMagick, changed icon path in desktop file "weka" only - java/java-devel R: and BR: made versioned to >= 1:1.6.0 - removed vendor tag in desktop-file-install according to the guidelines for new packages. New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/weka/weka.spec New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/weka/weka-3.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487617] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270152.n1R1qVld014249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270219.n1R2J07n018931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-26 21:18:58 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271152.n1RBqfEm007023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-02-27 06:52:40 EDT --- Any update on a review request for mingw32-expat? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271106.n1RB6OrA025660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-27 06:06:22 EDT --- Steven, is something missing to get this done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270701.n1R71CU4006523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 --- Comment #28 from Marek Mahut 2009-02-27 02:01:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Why would they do that? Because they are nice people? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271011.n1RAB6If014022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271011.n1RABMGD014086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270737.n1R7bKTw013788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |487637 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271447.n1RElDOk012926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 16:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271613.n1RGDWiw030956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Nicole Yancey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|485731 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:29:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271529.n1RFTAPW017825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 10:29:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333495) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333495) xmonad.spec-2.patch cabal2spec sync and some other requires tweaks. This also build, installs and uninstalls for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270209.n1R29mZ2012626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-26 21:09:46 EDT --- menu-cache-0.2.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/menu-cache-0.2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 16:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478553] Review Request: perl-WWW-Curl - Perl extension interface for libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271612.n1RGCbFY030780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478553 Nicole Yancey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |485731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 16:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271654.n1RGsiUo002866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-27 11:54:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Sure. That zip is ASL 2.0, which is fine. Awesome! > Since JSON seems to be useful for multiple projects, would it make sense to > package it separately? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: soud - Tools for hardware related services based on udev events In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271402.n1RE24jD002273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Petr Lautrbach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271531.n1RFVgfQ023208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #53 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 10:31:17 EDT --- One strange I think I did notice is that it seems like the binary redistribution clause is missing from the "BSD3" License - we should probably ask fedora-legal and upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271500.n1RF0Qqp015686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #52 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 10:00:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333489) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333489) ghc-X11.spec-3.patch Patch to latest cabal2spec-0.12. I think I am basically happy with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487645] Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271418.n1REI1vN006560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487645 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian 2009-02-27 09:17:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-wikicalendar Short Description: Simple calendar extension for mediawiki Owners: cdamian Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: soud - Tools for hardware related services based on udev events In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271401.n1RE1BH2002050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 --- Comment #5 from Petr Lautrbach 2009-02-27 09:00:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: soud Short Description: Tools for hardware related services based on udev events Owners: plautrba Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271521.n1RFLe3M016081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 --- Comment #10 from Kent Sebastian 2009-02-27 10:21:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Kent: I don't see you in the packager group. Is this your first package? First package indeed. I applied to the packager group, and overholt has since sponsored :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487115] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch - Perl throttled email notification for Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271025.n1RAPmic017130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487115 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 09:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226413] Merge Review: setuptool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270905.n1R95LtF031932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226413 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484563] Review Request: php-ezc-ConsoleTools - eZ Components ConsoleTools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270202.n1R22xMx011566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484563 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-26 21:02:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270230.n1R2UwNt016657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Bug 476315 depends on bug 453083, which changed state. Bug 453083 Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270230.n1R2Uq2t016598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Bug 453395 depends on bug 453083, which changed state. Bug 453083 Summary: Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270737.n1R7bLAS013809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |487639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 12:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487281] Review Request: eGroupware - A web-based groupware suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271247.n1RClsit013591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487281 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |egroupware -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 16:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271613.n1RGD0a6026973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Ben Boeckel 2009-02-27 11:12:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-networkmanagement Short Description: NetworkManager KDE 4 integration Owners: mathstuf rdieter Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226413] Merge Review: setuptool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271016.n1RAG7M2015207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226413 --- Comment #2 from Michal Nowak 2009-02-27 05:16:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > setuptool.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/setup > > + > > > [...] > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGETTEXT_PACKAGE=\"setup\" -DSETUPTOOLDDIR=\"/etc > > /setuptool.d\" -DOTHERSETUPTOOLDDIR=\"/usr/share/setuptool/setuptool.d\" > > -I. -Wall -Wextra -O2 -g -MT setup.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/setup.Tpo -c -o > > setup.o setup.c > > The setuptool build system does not honor Fedora compiler flags. Even though -g > is present the -debuginfo pkg is not written. This is some problem in my setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226268] Merge Review: perl-libwww-perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270256.n1R2uBXO021711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226268 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-02-26 21:56:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 3) I don't really know enough about the module to fix them. I looked at them a > few months ago, and couldn't figure out why they were failing in mock but not on > my system. You didn't in fact look, did you? ;) It's this: bug #487620, nothing that would block this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271122.n1RBM5r9000731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271446.n1REkTou012812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michel.sylvan at gmail.com |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #51 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-27 09:46:23 EDT --- Taking over review for Michel based on comment 47. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487713] New: Review Request: wcslib - An implementation of the FITS World Coordinate System standard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wcslib - An implementation of the FITS World Coordinate System standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487713 Summary: Review Request: wcslib - An implementation of the FITS World Coordinate System standard Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/wcslib.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/wcslib-4.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: WCSLIB is a library that implements the "World Coordinate System" (WCS) convention in FITS (Flexible Image Transport System) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] New: Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Summary: Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: plautrba at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/pmut/pmut.spec SRPM URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/pmut/pmut-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Pmut is set of tools and services for automated starting or stopping services related to hardware, using udev to detect event on hardware and DeviceKit to examine hw devices in udev subsystems. It's part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PowerManagement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487617] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271052.n1RAq3cp022902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 05:52:02 EDT --- aah. firefox crashed when I clicked commit. I will not go with full detailed review now. + rpmlint is clean + source verified as 4e0faf82577b4d7a9b116fc5a6825728 DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.06.tar.gz + Package perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.06-1.fc11-noarch => Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::ISO8601) = 0.06 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Format::Builder) perl(Params::Validate) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 04:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270425.n1R4PMUk012615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #21 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 23:25:18 EDT --- Package built. Closing review. http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/evolution-mapi/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 03:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453395] Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270355.n1R3tTXh006148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #29 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 22:55:24 EDT --- Package built. Closing review. http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/openchange/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270739.n1R7dOrl018938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-27 02:39:23 EDT --- This package obsoletes/provides libzzub since the upstream changed their name to armstrong. I'm adding Mamoru to CC since he was the original reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487667] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271135.n1RBZv0W003647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487667 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 13:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271349.n1RDnbWu031434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: soud - |Review Request: pmut - |power management udev tools |power management udev tools Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-27 08:49:35 EDT --- Everything ok. Also the source is matching 531917bbd9c1c48e81799457f90f6c7e The source should be changed after release into: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/something/soud-something.tgz ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 13:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: soud - Tools for hardware related services based on udev events In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271358.n1RDwap7001344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Petr Lautrbach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pmut - |Review Request: soud - |power management udev tools |Tools for hardware related | |services based on udev | |events --- Comment #4 from Petr Lautrbach 2009-02-27 08:58:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: soud Short Description: power management udev tools Owners: foo bar Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: baz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487667] New: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487667 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Net-XMPP2/perl-Net-XMPP2.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Net-XMPP2/perl-Net-XMPP2-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Net::XMPP2 - An implementation of the XMPP Protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 08:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487645] New: Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487645 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/mediawiki-wikicalendar.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/mediawiki-wikicalendar-1.15-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The extension adds an tag to the mediawiki syntax which can show calendars in different formats. The idea was to keep the calendar as simple as possible and leave all the editing and page creation to mediawiki. It doesn't require any new database tables or files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] New: Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 Summary: Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rtaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rtaudio-4.0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: RtAudio is a set of C++ classes that provide a common API for realtime audio input/output across different operating systems. RtAudio significantly simplifies the process of interacting with computer audio hardware. It was designed with the following objectives: * object-oriented C++ design * simple, common API across all supported platforms * allow simultaneous multi-api support * support dynamic connection of devices * provide extensive audio device parameter control * allow audio device capability probing * automatic internal conversion for data format, channel number compensation, (de)interleaving, and byte-swapping rpmlint: silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 08:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487535] Review Request: bltk - Baterry Life Tool Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270802.n1R82kLm023692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487535 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-27 03:02:44 EDT --- ? Rpmlint must be run on every package. bltk.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/bltk_report ../lib/bltk/bin/bltk_report bltk.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/bltk_report_uncompress ../lib/bltk/bin/bltk_report_uncompress bltk.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/bltk_report_table ../lib/bltk/bin/bltk_report_table bltk.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/bltk_report_compress ../lib/bltk/bin/bltk_report_compress bltk.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/lib64/bltk/bin/bltk_sudo root 04755 bltk.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/bltk/bin/bltk_sudo 04755 bltk.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/bltk_plot ../lib/bltk/bin/bltk_plot bltk.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/bltk ../lib/bltk/bin/bltk OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK The package MUST successfully compile. ? Correct BuildRequires. You can remove BR commented out. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. ? Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. Shouldn't be %{_libdir}/bltk/lib/libxse.so.0 in devel package? OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Comments: Setuid is ok in this case because it's needed by package, but dangling symlink is must fix. Is it arch specific? Shouldn't this be noarch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226413] Merge Review: setuptool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271009.n1RA93s4017898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226413 --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2009-02-27 05:09:01 EDT --- > Conflicts: pam < 0.78 Can be deleted, for Fedora at least. > You should install the setuptool package because you may find > yourself using its features for essential system administration. Kinda funny. > %configure Needs fix, see at the bottom. > make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make > %defattr(-,root,root) Use: %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc README Missing COPYING. %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/setup %attr(0644,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/* %attr(0644,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/security/console.apps/* %attr(0755,root,root) %{_sbindir}/setup %attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/setuptool.d %attr(0755,root,root) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/setuptool.d %attr(0644,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/setuptool.d/* `^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't think you need this that much. Just fix /usr/bin/setup not to have +w for group & others in the post-install phase and you have it. RPMLINT > setuptool.x86_64: W: no-url-tag If you don't know the correct URI, I will not mind stay in status quo. > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/setup > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99Xconfigurator > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/98system-config-keyboard > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99kbdconfig > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/98netconfig > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99timeconfig > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99system-config-network-tui > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/98system-config-authentication > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99authconfig > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99lokkit > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/setup > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99ntsysv > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99sndconfig > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99mouseconfig > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/98system-config-display > setuptool.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/setuptool.d/99printconf-tui This could be %config, if not %config(noreplace), at least. > setuptool.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/setup + > [...] > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGETTEXT_PACKAGE=\"setup\" -DSETUPTOOLDDIR=\"/etc > /setuptool.d\" -DOTHERSETUPTOOLDDIR=\"/usr/share/setuptool/setuptool.d\" > -I. -Wall -Wextra -O2 -g -MT setup.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/setup.Tpo -c -o > setup.o setup.c The setuptool build system does not honor Fedora compiler flags. Even though -g is present the -debuginfo pkg is not written. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 05:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270516.n1R5G2kF022806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2009-02-27 00:15:57 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean xx - does not follow Naming Guidelines + It would be better to name this package 'osggtk' instead of 'osgGtk'. The tarball is named 'osggtk' and Fedora's other OpenSceneGraph packages are named 'osgcal' and 'osgal'. Therefore having a completely lower-case name would be more consistent. But since you are also the upstream author, I would be willing to listen to your rationale for preferring otherwise. :-) OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Although the current Source0 URL works, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net the Source0 tag should have 'downloads' and not 'download'. + Even Fedora 9 has OpenSceneGraph-devel >= 2.2.0 for sometime now. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires no need to add it if its not really required. + Why is there a runtime dependency on 'OpenSceneGraph-devel >= 2.2.0' for osgGtkmm-devel? If it is because the osgGtkmm header files need the OpenSceneGraph headers, then the osgGtkmm-1.0.pc should mention it. + The osgGtkmm sub-package does not explicitly require osgGtk. Now I can understand that RPM is going to autogenerate the dependency on the shared library, but https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package does that "subpackages other than -devel should also require the base package using a fully versioned dependency". I find that you have done so for all the other sub-packages, but only not for osgGtkmm. I confess that I do not know the rationale behind this guideline. In the meantime, I will try to find out the reason. + You could consider using '%{__install} -p' consistently through the %install stanza. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines xx - License field does not meet actual license + Going by the license notices in the source code: (i) Makefile.am, examples/Makefile.am, osgGtk/Makefile.am, osgGtkmm/Makefile.am are under LGPLv3. (ii) the others are under GPLv3. Since you are the upstream author, for the Makefile.ams please consider marking them as GPLv3 or use the license notices in the autogenerated Makefile.ins. OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed xx - redundant and extra build dependencies listed + pkgconfig is brought in by all the -devel packages providing *.pc files OK - no locales OK - %post and %postun invoke ldconfig OK - package is not relocatable xx - file and directory ownership + The -devel and osgGtkmm-devel sub-packages should have 'Requires: gtk-doc' as it needs /usr/share/gtk-doc. OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently + Both %{name} and osgGtk are used. You could consider using %{name} throughout. + Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is looked down upon. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - no static libraries OK - devel has *.pc file and requires pkgconfig + Even though https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files lays down that the -devel sub-package must have 'Requires: pkgconfig' if it includes a *.pc file, Fedora 11 onwards rpm-4.6 autogenerates this runtime dependency and the ones on the other -devel subpackages mentioned in the *.pc file. So please consider removing them from Fedora 11 and onwards using a %if %endif pair. In osgGtk-devel: Requires: gtk2-devel Requires: gtkglext-devel Requires: OpenSceneGraph-devel >= 2.2.0 Requires: pkgconfig In osgGtkmm-devel: Requires: gtkmm24-devel Requires: gtkglextmm-devel Requires: pkgconfig OK - library files without suffix in -devel OK - -devel requires base package OK - no libtool archives xx - %{name}.desktop file is invalid + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop desktop-file-validate must be run on the .desktop file, and it says: [rishi at freebook osggtk-0.1.3]$ desktop-file-validate osgviewerGtk.desktop osgviewerGtk.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated [rishi at freebook osggtk-0.1.3]$ desktop-file-validate osgviewerGtkmm.desktop osgviewerGtkmm.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated [rishi at freebook osggtk-0.1.3]$ The key "Encoding" is deprecated on all supported versions of Fedora. Please consider removing it. OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected xx - scriptlets are not sane + Would be good if you could use the Gtk+ icon cache scripts from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache xx - subpackages other than -devel do not use fully versioned dependency + The osgGtkmm subpackage does not use a fully versioned dependency on osgGtk. OK - pkgconfig files in -devel OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270221.n1R2LIqN014687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianburrell at gmail. | |com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 13:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: soud - power management udev tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271322.n1RDMCFk020934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Petr Lautrbach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pmut - |Review Request: soud - |power management udev tools |power management udev tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 10:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271026.n1RAQB1x021649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 09:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:05:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270905.n1R95OZH004012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226258] Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270157.n1R1vDAh010398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 09:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270953.n1R9rWpR010035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #19 from Felix Kaechele 2009-02-27 04:53:21 EDT --- #18: I believe that you should contact Thomas Woerner on that. He maintains system-config-firewall. He might include it as a template into his package. I hope to finish the review soon but there are still some issues that need to be addressed. More to follow. Sorry for having you wait so long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487535] Review Request: bltk - Baterry Life Tool Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270749.n1R7nTQm016132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487535 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271440.n1REeo6N011335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 16:57:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:57:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271657.n1RGvukH008482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-27 11:57:53 EDT --- So, the logical followup is that someone should make a JSON package, get it reviewed, then have this package pull out its local copy and depend on the JSON package. This will also prevent odd things like having eclipse bits depend on a JBoss Web Server. ;) It should be a trivial package, feel free to poke me when it is ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 17:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487730] New: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487730 Summary: Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP/perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: AnyEvent::XMPP - An implementation of the XMPP Protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 03:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476315] Review Request: evolution-mapi - Exchange 2007 support for Evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270355.n1R3tUcP006192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476315 Bug 476315 depends on bug 453395, which changed state. Bug 453395 Summary: Review Request: OpenChange - Microsoft Exchange access with native protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453395 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 02:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:30:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270230.n1R2Uk0S016494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #68 from Matthew Barnes 2009-02-26 21:30:33 EDT --- Package built. Closing review. Finally. http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/samba4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 13:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:13:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271313.n1RDDa1g019252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 --- Comment #2 from Petr Lautrbach 2009-02-27 08:13:35 EDT --- project renamed: Spec URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/soud/soud.spec SRPM URL: http://plautrba.fedorapeople.org/soud/soud-0.1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Soud is set of tools and services for automated starting or stopping services related to hardware, using udev to detect event on hardware and DeviceKit to examine hw devices in udev subsystems. It's part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PowerManagement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 16:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484323] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch - Search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271619.n1RGJ4qu027890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484323 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-27 11:18:53 EDT --- Ian: Can we please make sure the license is right before doing builds? Did you query upstream about the ASL issue? what was the reply? Please don't build until this is all figured out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 14:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271438.n1REc7gv006862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-27 09:37:57 EDT --- Sure. That zip is ASL 2.0, which is fine. Since JSON seems to be useful for multiple projects, would it make sense to package it separately? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 01:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486561] Review Request: monsoon - Monsoon is a Bittorrent client written in Mono and GTK# In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270158.n1R1wevT010643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486561 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from David Nielsen 2009-02-26 20:58:36 EDT --- Monsoon is now in rawhide, F9 and F10 will follow as the required build deps make their way through bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 08:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270848.n1R8mQjv028002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484535] Review Request: kde-plasma-networkmanagement - Plasmoid to control Network Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271510.n1RFA88d018282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484535 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-27 10:10:06 EDT --- OK, there are some minor outstanding issues regarding licensing, but none of them are blocking and can be done later on, otherwise all the problems have been addressed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 06:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270636.n1R6aZf6006210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-27 01:36:33 EDT --- Most of the changes are fine. Would be a good idea to turn on the test suite, between %build and %install: %check CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/junit4.jar ant run_tests This currently fails, though: run_tests: [junit] Error: java.lang.ClassCastException: class weka.AllTests not sure why, you might want to ask on the upstream mailing list. Oh, and the %files section needs to be updated: it's still refering to fedora-%{name}.desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 08:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486657] Review Request: blahtexml - Converts TeX equations to MathML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270855.n1R8tWcm029530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486657 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-27 03:55:31 EDT --- You would need to become a sponsor first: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/SponsorProcess I'll look at "gvrpcd" and sponsor Jasper... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271511.n1RFBo8A014053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-27 10:11:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Most of the changes are fine. Would be a good idea to turn on the test suite, > between %build and %install: > > %check > CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/junit4.jar ant run_tests > Of course, that should have been BuildRequires: junit %check CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/junit.jar ant run_tests It takes forever to run, though, so perhaps surround it in an %if? %if %{?_with_tests:1}%{!?_with_tests:0} %check ... %endif (and put a one-line comment at the top describing the --with tests option) But that's secondary -- apart from the desktop file naming, this is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 06:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487507] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor-Array - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902270630.n1R6U2MA032522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487507 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 01:30:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > package build failed. > > koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1190374 > > > > Suggestions: > > 1) You don't need following in SPEC > > Requires: perl(AutoXS::Header) >= 0.02 > > I see this "Requires:" will get automatically installed via yum command. so thought not needed in SPEC. > Did you mean BR? It fails without it. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1190561&name=build.log > > 2) Missing > > BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) > Added. > > Thanks. New koji build could be found at: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1190611 thanks but I am unable to download SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 07:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] New: Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 Summary: Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong-0.2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: If you are searching for a foundation for your next soundtracker, armstrong is what you want. armstrong provides an extensible DSP plugin system, a wavetable, instruments, a multitrack sequencer and support for major soundcard APIs. armstrong includes zzub and lunar libraries. Rpmlint: There are bunch of W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings. But these files are really needed during runtime. I know it is weird. If you want to test these libraries you can try aldrin: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/aldrin/ There will be sample files inside /usr/share/aldrin/demosongs/ aldrin is an accepted package but I didn't update it because it requires armstrong-0.2.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271513.n1RFDoi6014494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-27 10:13:48 EDT --- Christian, at first glance, this package looks great. I only noticed one thing when I did the review: The package is internationalized, with .mo files for libanki and libankiqt. Unfortunately, they're in a location that %find_lang (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files) doesn't know how to find them in (%{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES). Since you can't use %find_lang, you're going to have to tag those files manually, like this: %lang(cs) %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/locale/cs_*/ (rpm tags on the first half of the locale country code only) Unfortunately, this will make your %files more complicated, as you cannot simply claim the toplevel directory or these files will be listed twice. Start with something like this: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING ChangeLog CREDITS README* %dir %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/ %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/*.py* %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/forms/ %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/ui/ %dir %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/locale/ %lang(cs) %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/locale/cs_*/ %lang(de) %{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/locale/de_*/ ... It is also possible to script a version of find_lang that can find these files and tag them properly in a file list to use in %files, but that might be more complicated than doing what I've proposed. rpmlint caught this problem, you should run rpmlint on your packages to look for issues like this. :) Show me a new package that has this issue fixed and I'll finish out this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487645] Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271133.n1RBX4B7030997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487645 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 06:33:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1204564 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. f99d5fa46be90862952e8f914e217f4d wikicalendar-1.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions: 1) License tag should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 15:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271535.n1RFZaPA019257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-27 10:35:33 EDT --- %define ver 20070815 Please don't do this. Just put that in Version: and use %{version}. It will simplify the spec. Also, the license tag is wrong. All of the code simply says "GPL", so the tag should be : License: GPL+ See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F Also, it looks like the Source0 url is wrong, it should be: http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/%{name}_%{version}.tar.bz2 And... ncurses-devel is a Requires of readline-devel, so you shouldn't need to BuildRequires it. Aside from that, everything looks fine. I'll finish the review, but please show me a finished package before I can flip the approved flag. == Review == Good: - rpmlint checks return: uml_utilities.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/uml_net root 04755 uml_utilities.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/uml_net 04755 Safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (4e10de8e0f5bf681fa295572009518b77fd8a1dd) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 11:43:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: pmut - power management udev tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271143.n1RBhxZB000776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-27 06:43:58 EDT --- ? Rpmlint must be run on every package. pmut.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.2-1 ['0.1.2-2.fc10', '0.1.2-2'] ? The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. This name can collide with http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/21/14/3176 or libraries for genetic algorithm http://gtps.math.cmu.edu/htmldoc-etps/pmut.html OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English ;-) OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. ? The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. The source must be located on f.e. project page. OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). The require line is too long, please create at least two instead. %doc can be on one line ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 17:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:55:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487737] New: Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Summary: Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/slock/slock.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/slock/slock-0.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Built RPMs for F10 i386 and x86_64: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/slock/ Description: slock is a simple X display locker. Really this is the simplest X screen locker we are aware of. It is stable and quite a lot people in this community are using it every day when they are out with friends or fetching some food from the local pub. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 18:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 437321] Review Request: libarchive - A library for handling streaming archive formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271841.n1RIf0wd031663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437321 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2009-02-27 13:40:56 EDT --- Why is --disable-bsdtar used? bsdtar has some nice features. I can help creating the bsdtar subpackage if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 18:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271838.n1RIcp64030889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-27 13:38:49 EDT --- Some notes: - When currently upstream only provides static archive and does not provide shared library, patching Makefiles on vendor side to create share library may cause annnoying problem, e.g. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-February/msg00047.html Also there is no guarrantee that the API of the created shared library won't change when the major version of the package version does not change. Current Fedora guidelines provides a way to package static archives (when unavoidable) and for this case I think shipping static archive instead of patching on Fedora side is much safer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Note: When switching to creating static archive, passing "-fPIC" is still needed if the archive is needed for creating shared libraries in other application. - Your package does not build on ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1205561 Adding -------------------------------------------------------- cp -p /usr/lib/rpm/config.{sub,guess} config/ -------------------------------------------------------- at the end of %prep will make the build succeed. ref: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-February/msg02238.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 18:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271852.n1RIqeJQ002391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-27 13:52:37 EDT --- Thanks - I will do the ppc64 fix - About the static library, shall I just make a package with just the static library and no dynamic library, or shall I add a -static subpackage and put the .a file in there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 18:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271858.n1RIwQ1h002368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-02-27 13:58:25 EDT --- Nope just me forgetting to finish it. Sorry about that. Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487617] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271906.n1RJ6Oe8005071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487617 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487617] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 - Parses ISO8601 formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271906.n1RJ6MaG005049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487617 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-27 14:06:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 Short Description: Parses ISO8601 formats Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271908.n1RJ8iOX007084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-27 14:08:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - About the static library, shall I just make a package with just the static > library and no dynamic library, > or shall I add a -static subpackage and put the .a file in there? >From current guidelines, - create a package "rtaudio-devel" (from "rtaudio" srpm) (for this package, "rtaudio-devel" binary rpm only) * with containing static archives, header files and some documents * rtaudio-devel _must_ have "Provides: rtaudio-staic = %{version}-%{release}". And when other packages need "librtaudio.a" for building, such packages must have "BuildRequires: rtaudio-static", not "BuildRequires: rtaudio-devel" so that we can trace what packages are using static archives for linkage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271922.n1RJMMw5011178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-27 14:22:19 EDT --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487645] Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271924.n1RJOlr0011508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487645 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271923.n1RJNmVP009411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-02-27 14:23:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-stopwatch Short Description: Simple stopwatch for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 19:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902271956.n1RJu2D8017557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #24 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-27 14:56:01 EDT --- You are completely correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 20:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272010.n1RKAL8j024155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-27 15:10:18 EDT --- OK. Here are the changes: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rtaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rtaudio-4.0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm It builds fine in all archs in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206042 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 20:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272013.n1RKDBVR021911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 15:13:09 EDT --- metalink-0.3.6-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metalink-0.3.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 20:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:13:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272013.n1RKDFtS021952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 15:13:14 EDT --- metalink-0.3.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metalink-0.3.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 20:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272021.n1RKLdk5024670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-02-27 15:21:38 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review! (In reply to comment #3) > The package is internationalized, with .mo files for libanki and libankiqt. > Unfortunately, they're in a location that %find_lang > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files) > doesn't know how to find them in > (%{python_sitelib}/ankiqt/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES). Since you can't use > %find_lang, you're going to have to tag those files manually, like this: I've fixed the problem as suggested. > It is also possible to script a version of find_lang that can find these files > and tag them properly in a file list to use in %files, but that might be more > complicated than doing what I've proposed. Yeah, this makes the spec file a little bit more complicated. I'll try to get this problem fixed upstream, but for now I think it's ok! ;-) > rpmlint caught this problem, you should run rpmlint on your packages to look > for issues like this. :) rpmlint SPECS/anki.spec RPMS/noarch/anki-0.9.9.6-3.fc10.noarch.rpm SRPMS/anki-0.9.9.6-3.fc10.src.rpm anki.src: W: strange-permission generate-anki-tarball.sh 0755 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The remaining warning is about the mode of the script to generate the distributable tarball. Since the file is an executable shell script it may be ok... > Show me a new package that has this issue fixed and I'll finish out this > review. Great! The new package is uploaded: Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki.spec SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki-0.9.9.6-3.fc10.src.rpm and builds fine in F10 and F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206089 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 20:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272046.n1RKkwMw030407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-27 15:46:58 EDT --- == Review == Good: - rpmlint checks return: anki.src: W: strange-permission generate-anki-tarball.sh 0755 Safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3+ and MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales okay - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - desktop file okay APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 21:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272104.n1RL4rWv003667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 --- Comment #14 from Christian Krause 2009-02-27 16:04:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #13) > Please don't do this. Just put that in Version: and use %{version}. It will > simplify the spec. Fixed. > Also, the license tag is wrong. All of the code simply says "GPL", so the tag > should be : License: GPL+ Fixed. > Also, it looks like the Source0 url is wrong, it should be: > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/%{name}_%{version}.tar.bz2 Fixed, spectool -g SPECS/uml_utilities.spec works fine now, sha1sum: 4e10de8e0f5bf681fa295572009518b77fd8a1dd > And... ncurses-devel is a Requires of readline-devel, so you shouldn't need to > BuildRequires it. Fixed. Package builds fine locally using mock and for F10 and F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206294 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206307 > Aside from that, everything looks fine. I'll finish the review, but please show > me a finished package before I can flip the approved flag. I've uploaded the new packages: Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities-20070815-4.fc10.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/uml_utilities.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 21:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272110.n1RLABLx002998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-02-27 16:10:10 EDT --- Looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 21:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469291] Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272114.n1RLE7ic003655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Paul Wouters 2009-02-27 16:14:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: uml_utilities Short Description: Utilities for user-mode linux kernel Owners: pwouters Branches: EL-5, F-9, F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 21:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487665] Review Request: soud - Tools for hardware related services based on udev events In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272125.n1RLPOtW006168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487665 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |davidz at redhat.com, | |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham 2009-02-27 16:25:23 EDT --- OK, so looking this over, this doesn't seem right. 1) It implements a critical path in the boot process... in perl. 2) It's needlessly baroque for what it does. You set up a perl daemon to listen to udev for events, look for events of a certain type, and then run actions. Why not just write udev rules that run actions on certain events, and cut out the daemon middleman? 3) It's set to start bluetooth only if it's configured to start. Which means it's likely to have *already started*, and therefore doesn't decrease the running daemon footprint at all. 4) It drops stuff into predictable file names in /tmp, which is a security hole. (Presumably, that's leftover debugging) CC'ing some other people who may have ideas on how to better implement this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 22:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:15:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272215.n1RMFo4f017886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-27 17:15:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1206919 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 22:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272218.n1RMIOXS016638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-27 17:18:23 EDT --- Package updated due to a change in the rtaudio package. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong-0.2.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.2.6-2 - BR: rtaudio-static instead of rtaudio-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 22:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272227.n1RMR3To019904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at christoph- | |wickert.de) --- Comment #10 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2009-02-27 17:27:01 EDT --- Great. But "gtk2-devel" is really needed as a BuildRequires, if not Mock doesn't build (tested with a fedora-rawhide). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 22:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272239.n1RMd6I0022039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #11 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-27 17:39:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > scratch the yum update perl* from above, I've done it correctly now. but the > behaviour is the same > and it does not matter if I use the correct password or not, I have the exact > same output... > [root at pc64 ~]# reviewtool status > Retrieving status from bugzilla.... This was being caused by a non-authenticated query _not_ returning the email address... So the typing/coercion of that attribute was causing that issue. I've updated to just force a bugzilla login for now; the above packages were used for submit/update in a mock rawhide chroot and should work fine now. (Not sure about F-10, but if it's an issue I'll push out a new Fedora::Bugzilla to F-10 faster than normal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 22:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272240.n1RMe5xY020705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Christian Krause 2009-02-27 17:40:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: anki Short Description: Flashcard program for using space repetition learning Owners: chkr Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 22:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487808] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487808 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.03007-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Integrate your HTML::FormFu forms with a DBIx::Class model. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207046 *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 23:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487809] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links Alias: perl-HTML-LinkList https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-LinkList OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-HTML-LinkList.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-HTML-LinkList-0.1503-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module contains a number of functions for taking sets of URLs and labels and creating suitably formatted HTML. These links are "smart" because, if given the url of the current page, if any of the links in the list equal it, that item in the list will be formatted as a special label, not as a link; this is a Good Thing, since the user would be confused by clicking on a link back to the current page. While many website systems have plugins for "smart" navbars, they are specialized for that system only, and can't be reused elsewhere, forcing people to reinvent the wheel. I hereby present one wheel, free to be reused by anybody; just the simple functions, a backend, which can be plugged into whatever system you want.The default format for the HTML is to make an unordered list, but there are many options, enabling one to have a flatter layout with any separators you desire, or a more complicated list with differing formats for different levels. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207061 *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 23:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272324.n1RNOhDr030178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 18:24:41 EDT --- pipviewer-0.3.9-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pipviewer-0.3.9-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 27 23:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481508] Review Request: pipviewer - Visualizer for multiple alignments of genomic sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902272324.n1RNOlT1028264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481508 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 18:24:46 EDT --- pipviewer-0.3.9-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pipviewer-0.3.9-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 00:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 477570] Review Request: couchdb - A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280043.n1S0hrEm010319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477570 --- Comment #10 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-27 19:43:51 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 01:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487818] New: Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst Alias: perl-Task-Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487818 Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Task-Catalyst OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Task-Catalyst.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Task-Catalyst-3.0000-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package ensures everything you need to write serious Catalyst applications is installed. Install this if you're interested in developing Catalyst apps. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207555 *rt-0.05 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487809] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280211.n1S2BW6b023436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487818] Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280211.n1S2BOon021087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487818 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487808] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280211.n1S2BJrl021059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487808 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487730] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280213.n1S2Df9R023594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487730 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487818] Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280249.n1S2n4ES026125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487818 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 21:49:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207555 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7a1dbc782dd2cc4e23c3ee0fde6e555f Task-Catalyst-3.0000.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.12 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.17 CPU) + Package perl-Task-Catalyst-3.0000-1.fc11-noarch -> Provides: perl(Task::Catalyst) = 3.0000 Requires: perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487809] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280249.n1S2n5qw026145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 21:49:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207061 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 57e79ea9a15e57864042d3645651530c HTML-LinkList-0.1503.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=61, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 1.05 cusr 0.09 csys = 1.21 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-LinkList-0.1503-1.fc11-noarch -> Provides: perl(HTML::LinkList) = 0.1503 Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:49:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487808] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280249.n1S2nAqq026174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487808 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 21:49:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207046 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url caca3a81477206d8233ed39b46b4d8ce HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.03007.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=107, Tests=648, 124 wallclock secs ( 0.15 usr 0.18 sys + 40.77 cusr 5.05 csys = 46.15 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.03007-1.fc11-noarch -> Provides: perl(HTML::FormFu::Model::DBIC) = 0.03007 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(HTML::FormFu::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Storable) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 02:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487730] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280258.n1S2wcJY027555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487730 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 21:58:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207752 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6c25cb47a603f48b81b76f5a20394fcd AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=25, Tests=75, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.12 usr 0.05 sys + 4.20 cusr 0.41 csys = 4.78 CPU) + Package perl-AnyEvent-XMPP-0.4-1.fc11-noarch -> Provides: perl(AnyEvent::XMPP) = 0.4 perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Client) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Component) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Connection) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Exception) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::IQ) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::IQAuth) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::MUC) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Message) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Parser) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Presence) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Register) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::SASL) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Stanza) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Error::Stream) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::DataForm) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Disco) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Disco::Info) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Disco::Items) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::MUC) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::MUC::Message) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::MUC::Room) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::MUC::RoomInfo) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::MUC::User) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::OOB) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Ping) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Pubsub) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::RegisterForm) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Registration) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::VCard) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Ext::Version) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Extendable) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Account) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Connection) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Contact) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Delayed) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Message) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Presence) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::IM::Roster) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Namespaces) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Node) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Parser) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::SimpleConnection) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::TestClient) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Util) perl(AnyEvent::XMPP::Writer) Requires: perl(AnyEvent) perl(AnyEvent::Handle) perl(AnyEvent::Socket) perl(Authen::SASL) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::Handle) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Net::LibIDN) perl(Object::Event) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Test::More) perl(XML::Parser::Expat) perl(XML::Writer) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487667] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280313.n1S3D6X1030005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487667 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-27 22:13:05 EDT --- I see that other package[1] you submitted is latest development on cpan. Do You still want this package? [1] Bug 487730 - Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280323.n1S3NgDg032449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:23:41 EDT --- webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280323.n1S3NZrL032406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.1.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:26:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280326.n1S3QK9j003676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:26:19 EDT --- bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280323.n1S3NWaO002584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:23:30 EDT --- flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280323.n1S3NlKx002675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2-1.fc9 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3SKMj001628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:28:19 EDT --- webkit-sharp-0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3S2FT001522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:28:01 EDT --- bpg-fonts-20090205-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486723] Review Request: webkit-sharp - .NET bindings for WebKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3SOei001665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-1.fc9 |0.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3S7Yd001561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20090205-5.fc10 |20090205-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3Sfm1001761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-2.fc10 |0.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280327.n1S3R8wj001345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.1-6.fc10 |0.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483865] Review Request: bpg-fonts - Georgian Unicode fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280326.n1S3QP3Y001152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483865 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090205-5.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280327.n1S3RUe4001431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3SV8Z001717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:28:30 EDT --- metalink-0.3.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update metalink'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-2197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3SmPO004516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:28:46 EDT --- flickrnet-2.1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3ScTl004471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:28:36 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280327.n1S3R4oC004210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:27:02 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-0.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486869] Review Request: flickrnet - A .NET library to interact with Flickr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280328.n1S3SrIG004553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1.5-1.fc9 |2.1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280327.n1S3RPAj004286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:27:24 EDT --- menu-cache-0.2.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 03:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:29:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280329.n1S3TlXx002456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-27 22:29:46 EDT --- metalink-0.3.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update metalink'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2205 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 05:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487839] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email - Send emails with Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email - Send emails with Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487839 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email - Send emails with Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207949 Description: Send emails with Catalyst and Email::Send and Email::MIME::Creator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487818] Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280603.n1S63cGG024905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487818 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487808] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280603.n1S63H7A024872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487808 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-28 01:03:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC Short Description: Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:03:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487809] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280603.n1S63TdA026872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487808] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC - Integrate HTML::FormFu with DBIx::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280603.n1S63Kma026823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487808 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487818] Review Request: perl-Task-Catalyst - All you need to start with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280603.n1S63bnB026898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487818 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-28 01:03:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Task-Catalyst Short Description: All you need to start with Catalyst Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487809] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280603.n1S63RjP026850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-28 01:03:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-LinkList Short Description: Create a 'smart' list of HTML links Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280604.n1S644Yo024972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 01:04:04 EDT --- It was enabling the python bindings. When those are enabled, it assumes python... passing it '-lang=ff' causes it to use the 'legacy' fontforge scripting lang. Will get this imported and built now. Does the fontconfig file I have here look ok? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: levien-inconsolata-fonts Short Description: A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print Owners: kevin Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487840] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton - Singleton to context Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton - Singleton to context https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487840 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton - Singleton to context Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton-0.02-1.fc11.noarch.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207993 Description: Singleton accessors to context. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487840] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton - Singleton to context In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280607.n1S67eh0027587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487840 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 01:07:39 EDT --- Oops. That was the noarch RPM. Should be SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487841] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode - Unicode aware Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode - Unicode aware Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487841 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode - Unicode aware Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208000 Description: On request, decodes all params from UTF-8 octets into a sequence of logical characters. On response, encodes body into UTF-8 octets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487839] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email - Send emails with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280622.n1S6MDIq029626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487839 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-02-28 01:22:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1207949 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 173e2b91b21e55da9671220734869c6d Catalyst-Plugin-Email-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is NOT present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=1, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.14 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email-0.08-1.fc11-noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Email) = 0.08 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Email::MIME) perl(Email::MIME::Creator) perl(Email::Send) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 06:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487839] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email - Send emails with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280631.n1S6VWIA028900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487839 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 01:31:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email Short Description: Send emails with Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 07:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:39:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485643] Review Request: django-authopenid - Django application to integrate Django authentication system with OpenID In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280739.n1S7deJT007820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485643 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-28 02:39:38 EDT --- Closing this Review Request since django-authopenid built and pushed to fedora repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 08:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280807.n1S87CZg009788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 08:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 475144] Review Request: metalink - CLI Metalink generation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280805.n1S850JL009212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475144 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-28 03:04:58 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 08:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487847] New: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Merge - Three-way merge and diff Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Merge - Three-way merge and diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487847 Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Merge - Three-way merge and diff Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Algorithm-Merge.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Algorithm-Merge-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208124 Description: This module complements Algorithm::Diff by providing three-way merge and diff functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280914.n1S9ErtF019794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-02-28 04:14:52 EDT --- * Patches have been merged upstream into gvrpcd-1.2, which does not exist as tarball release yet, though. Quite a lot of issues with this package: * %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/gvrpcd - must not be executable - is a configuration file that ought to be marked %config(noreplace) - defaults to "eth0" (why?) - the default is also a bit strange considering that the initscript defaults to eth0 already https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files * rpmlint /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/gvrpcd-1.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm gvrpcd.i386: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/gvrpcd gvrpcd.i386: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/gvrpcd gvrpcd.i386: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/gvrpcd gvrpcd.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/gvrpcd 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. Run "rpmlint -i ..." on the built rpms for helpful explanations. * Documentation for initscripts can be found here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript There even is a template you ought to use. * Upstream is advised to include a proper GPLv2 header as suggested in the GPL itself. The way it is done currently in gvrpcd.c is doubtful, because it is a "source" file and the header refers to "this license document". It doesn't even mention a link to the GPL. * The README points to http://wiki.ethereal.com/GVRP which gives 404 Not Found. * With defaults, but no /proc/net/vlan/config because of disabled VLAN interfaces, the daemon logs "fopen: /proc/net/vlan/config: No such file or directory", says it started successfully, but actually has terminated (gvrpcd dead but subsys locked). Shutting down prints FAILED, but logs "shutdown succeeded" and runs into the 8 seconds sleep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487349] Review Request: bashdb - BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280925.n1S9PhC8024225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487349 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-02-28 04:25:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bashdb Short Description: BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger Owners: roma Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11(devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280928.n1S9SkJr024530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-02-28 04:28:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pydb Short Description: Extended Python Debugger Owners: roma Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11(devel) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487851] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487851 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-HTML-LinkList.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-HTML-LinkList-0.1503-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208236 Description: This module contains a number of functions for taking sets of URLs and labels and creating suitably formatted HTML. These links are "smart" because, if given the url of the current page, if any of the links in the list equal it, that item in the list will be formatted as a special label, not as a link; this is a Good Thing, since the user would be confused by clicking on a link back to the current page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487852] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-SimpleParse - Bare-bones HTML parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-SimpleParse - Bare-bones HTML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487852 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-SimpleParse - Bare-bones HTML parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-HTML-SimpleParse.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-HTML-SimpleParse-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208237 Description: This module is a simple HTML parser. It is similar in concept to HTML::Parser, but it differs from HTML::TreeBuilder in a couple of important ways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487809] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280942.n1S9gv6L026923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487809 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 04:42:54 EDT --- *** Bug 487851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 09:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487851] Review Request: perl-HTML-LinkList - Create a 'smart' list of HTML links In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902280942.n1S9guPs026894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487851 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 04:42:54 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 487809 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 10:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281021.n1SALfsh001488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Jeffrey Goh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at linux.com.sg --- Comment #62 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-02-28 05:21:32 EDT --- SLAB is nice. This was the most up to date I could find for fedora 10, but since I'm on fc10 and not rawhide, this didn't exactly work "straight out of the box" for me. I ended up amending Karl's patch file before I found the "official" 0.9.12 release. Here is my replacement patch. You'll want it in your rpmbuild/SOURCES directory after you install Karl's src.rpm http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora10/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-2/fedora-main-menu.patch I'll get the official 0.9.12 release into the RPM in due course. The network button doesn't work for me still, so I'll have to figure that out ... Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 10:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281056.n1SAuFxZ007621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #11 from David Nielsen 2009-02-28 05:56:13 EDT --- Due to inactivity since 2008-10-20 I am closing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 10:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443576] Review Request: monodevelop-boo - boo plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281056.n1SAuGJt005148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443576 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #8 from David Nielsen 2009-02-28 05:56:15 EDT --- Due to inactivity since 2008-10-20 I am closing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 10:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443578] Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281056.n1SAuDZn005110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen 2009-02-28 05:56:11 EDT --- Due to inactivity since 2008-10-20 I am closing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 10:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281057.n1SAvE9m007763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #5 from David Nielsen 2009-02-28 05:57:11 EDT --- Due to inactivity since 2008-11-18 I am closing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281106.n1SB66hd009479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #3 from Jasper Capel 2009-02-28 06:06:04 EDT --- Thanks. I'll have another go at it. Still in the process of learning. :) Upstream modified the init-script I used a bit, so it works on other distributions as well, and asked me to test it. I'll do so, and ask him to release after I did. It deviates more from the Fedora SysV guidelines, so I'll make a new, proper one, and include that by patching the sources. Your last remark, about when /proc/net/vlan/config does not exist, is that something that I should test for in the init-script, or should this be fixed another way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487856] New: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from an HTML form) based on input profile Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from an HTML form) based on input profile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487856 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from an HTML form) based on input profile Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Data-FormValidator.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-Data-FormValidator-4.63-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208361 Description: Data::FormValidator's main aim is to make input validation expressible in a simple format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225612] Merge Review: beagle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281151.n1SBpM7Q017447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225612 --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah 2009-02-28 06:51:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Okay, here comes rpmlint on the latest in rawhide: > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-windows > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/BeagleSearch.xml > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/query-mapping.xml OK, done. > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/xdg/autostart/beagled-autostart.desktop Not sure if this should be threated like a config file... > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-applications > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/Networking.xml > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/blocate.conf > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-monodoc > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/external-filters.xml.sample > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/config-files/Daemon.xml > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-documentation > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-executables > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/beagle/config-files/FilesQueryable.xml > beagle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/beagle/crawl-rules/crawl-manpages > > Please mark all of these as %config(noreplace). OK, done. > beagle.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/beagle/keygrabber.py 0644 > > Please fix permissions on that script. OK, done > beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/beagle beaglidx > beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/cache/beagle beaglidx > beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/beagle/indexes beaglidx > beagle.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/cache/beagle/indexes beaglidx > > Safe to ignore. > > beagle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/beagle-config > beagle.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/beagle/libbeagleglue.so > > beagle.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libbeagle > > Safe to ignore. Odd that it doesn't end up building against libbeagle though. Is linked at runtime (dlopen) > beagle-epiphany.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/epiphany/2.24/extensions/beagle.py 0644 > > Please fix permissions on that script. Fixed. > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/locale/zh-CN/contents.rdf > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/beagleAddFilter.xul > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/indexLink.xul > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/skin/classic/overlay.css > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/utils.js > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/locale/zh-CN/beagle.dtd > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/content/beagleAddFilter.js > > Are these really executable scripts? Do they need to be chmod +x? No, fixed. > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/lib64/mozilla/extensions/{ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}/{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}/chrome/locale/zh-CN/contents.rdf > > Please fix the end of line encoding here. sed -i 's/\r//' foo > > beagle-firefox.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > beagle-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > Safe to ignore. > > beagle-gnome.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/beagle/libbeagleuiglue.so > > You should have a beagle-gnome-devel package for this one. No this file gets dlopened its not something that is linked against at build time. > beagle-thunderbird.x86_64: W: no-documentation > beagle-thunderbird.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > Safe to ignore. > > ***** > > Please make the changes that I illustrated from rpmlint, and I'll finish the > review. Thanks, fixed in 0.3.9-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281153.n1SBrX77017773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #54 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-28 06:53:30 EDT --- http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spin-kickstarts.git Looking at the license again the missing clause is just: "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution." so I don't think there is a problem, but I just sent a mail to fedora-legal anyway to confirm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 11:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281155.n1SBt14w014909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #55 from Jens Petersen 2009-02-28 06:54:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spin-kickstarts.git Oops, that should have been: http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/X11/LICENSE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487840] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton - Singleton to context In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281205.n1SC5Rl3020430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487840 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-28 07:05:24 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: b6cac4fc29d73504aaccba40449e2ff32afac7e9 Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton-0.02.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487841] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode - Unicode aware Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281210.n1SCAZ7F021378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487841 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-28 07:10:32 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as define d in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file , containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7bfe56992fe6849d554152fac4c619da5183e7ab Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-0.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions se ction of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:12:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487730] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281212.n1SCCEJu021600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487730 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-28 07:12:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP Short Description: Implementation of the XMPP Protocol Owners: allisson Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487847] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Merge - Three-way merge and diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281218.n1SCIueh022557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487847 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-28 07:18:54 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 89d2c606c27cbed4a7a1cad0737e437a1d27cf00 Algorithm-Merge-0.08.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487852] Review Request: perl-HTML-SimpleParse - Bare-bones HTML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281224.n1SCOK33020246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487852 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-28 07:24:19 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 46823e4344ab6ca91078a21e16434a26aafe5f9d HTML-SimpleParse-0.12.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-Engli sh languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487667] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281231.n1SCV1g8024642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487667 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-02-28 07:30:59 EDT --- Thanks for advice, this package is deprecated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 12:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:35:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487856] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from an HTML form) based on input profile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281235.n1SCZFYo022254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487856 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-02-28 07:35:13 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of source file: d401db7573da545a67368772589fc11cd9aa6002 Data-FormValidator-4.63.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass. ===Notes=== I'd say you can ditch the "BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.008". It's satisfied by all distributions built this century. Even Fedora Core 1 was using perl 5.8.1 ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 13:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485563] Review Request: fsarchiver - Safe and flexible file-system backup/deployment tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281342.n1SDgn4w004709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485563 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-28 08:42:48 EDT --- fsarchiver-0.4.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.4.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 13:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281345.n1SDjjsV002473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lemenkov at gmail.com |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 08:45:43 EDT --- Taking for review ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 14:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281435.n1SEZUVa014102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 09:35:28 EDT --- I patched the spec file (see comment 13), so this review refers to the patched package. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208731 + rpmlint output bochs-bios.x86_64: E: no-binary We can ignore this error - rpmlint doesn't recognise the binary. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license LGPLv2+ + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm Verified by checking out Bochs sources from upstream git. + package successfully builds on at least one architecture n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun n/a does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file n/a packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 14:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281437.n1SEbTRJ014386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 09:37:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333604) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333604) Updated bochs-bios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 14:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281439.n1SEdmBq012326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 09:39:47 EDT --- --------------------------- This package (release 0.6) is APPROVED by rjones --------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 14:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281439.n1SEd14P012205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 09:39:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333605) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333605) Patch to bochs-bios.spec from release 0.3 to release 0.6. This patch shows the differences between release 0.3 and release 0.6. Note that you will have to rename %{SOURCE1} in your SOURCES directory, because I removed the release part from the name of this file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 14:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281442.n1SEgcB5015301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-28 09:42:33 EDT --- Thanks a lot Kevin. The package has been imported and built fine. We only have but #438609 to go before elisa is usable again in Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 14:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281457.n1SEvWVX017970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-28 09:57:30 EDT --- One thing: - Does files under tests/ create some binaries useful for developers, or these files exist just to check if these files really compile with librtaudio.a? If latter, I think it is better to remove tests/ from %doc and add %check section to execute some tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 15:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:10:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281510.n1SFAmql020586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-28 10:10:46 EDT --- Unfortunately, the package in its current state doesn't change much in the current situation with prebuilt files in qemu rpm.. It just drops blobs into the main repository as qemu did before. I tried to rebuild this package with different compilers (pcc, tinycc), but with no success so far. I still think that we should add i386-gcc on every non-x86 arch before submitting this title. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 15:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281513.n1SFDKll018488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Bug 467420 depends on bug 467409, which changed state. Bug 467409 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 15:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281513.n1SFDJce018450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 10:13:15 EDT --- I think I forgot to close this. It's been in Rawhide for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 15:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffc - Computer version of the board game Rush Hou In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281540.n1SFeGC5025593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(sindrepb at fedorapr | |oject.org) --- Comment #6 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-02-28 10:40:11 EDT --- - rpmlint is saying error on package built for F-11 (rawhide): pytraffic.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/pytraffic/_hint.so 0775 pytraffic.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/pytraffic/_sdl_mixer.so 0775 - Use "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" for themes subpackage. - Licensing of music and graphics should be clarified. And, if it is not GPLv2+ correspondent name added to License tag. - Why change from 19.000 to 19,000 that was previously suggested wasn't made? - Add proper game category like LogicGame when doing desktop-file-install. - Remove "--vendor fedora" as per guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 15:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470066] Review Request: R-qtl - Quantitative trait loci (qtl) functionality for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281553.n1SFrghd024614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470066 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-02-28 10:53:40 EDT --- After contacting the upstream developers they sent me a new version of the code where they have fixed the inconsistent license information. I have created an updated package based on this version: Spec URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl.spec SRPM URL: http://www3.tsl.uu.se/~ellert/R-qtl/R-qtl-1.10-1.fc9.src.rpm The source (qtl_1.10-28.tar.gz) differs from the version you can download from the website (qtl_1.10-27.tar.gz), but the only difference is the updated license information. Since the license information now is consistent I have reverted the License tag in the spec file to be GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 15:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffc - Computer version of the board game Rush Hou In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281556.n1SFu6Pm025130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-02-28 10:56:05 EDT --- - Also, "Rush Hour" and company name should be removed from description as it is trademarks. Suggested change is to "PyTraffic is sliding block puzzle game. ..." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281612.n1SGCF4v030275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-02-28 11:12:13 EDT --- I don't understand comment 16. This package builds from source on %{ix86} and x86_64. It doesn't build from source on non-x86 builders, simply because they lack the required cross-compiler. If Koji did something sensible with: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 BuildArch: noarch then we could even build properly on Koji and create a noarch package. The fact that it doesn't is just a bug in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:19:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281619.n1SGJXwM031146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #16 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-28 11:19:31 EDT --- elisa and elisa-plugins-good are now up to 0.5.29 in devel, and the package to be reviewed has also been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281618.n1SGIV9B031055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 --- Comment #6 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-28 11:18:29 EDT --- * Sat Feb 28 2009 Milos Jakubicek - 3.6.0-3 - Fixed desktop file name - Added optional running junit tests into %%check, added BR:junit - Fixed changelog entry The failing jUnit tests have been files into upstream bugtracker. New SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/weka/weka.spec New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/weka/weka-3.6.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446097] Review Request: pytraffic - sliding block puzzle board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281625.n1SGPKcr032197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446097 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pytraffc - |Review Request: pytraffic - |Computer version of the |sliding block puzzle board |board game Rush Hou |game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487874] New: Review Request: fcode-utils - Utilities for dealing with FCode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fcode-utils - Utilities for dealing with FCode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487874 Summary: Review Request: fcode-utils - Utilities for dealing with FCode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fcode-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fcode-utils-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Utilities for dealing with FCode, a Forth programming language dialect compliant with ANS Forth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487874] Review Request: fcode-utils - Utilities for dealing with FCode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281636.n1SGac79031078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487874 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-28 11:36:37 EDT --- Note: original tarball contains also 'localvalues' directory, which contents liensed under Common Public License v. 1.0. I don't understand, what's the purpose of this content, and therefore didn't decide where should I install it, so I (temporarily, I hope) ignored it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487874] Review Request: fcode-utils - Utilities for dealing with FCode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281637.n1SGbbmd001487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487874 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281637.n1SGbdHM001532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |487874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 16:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281643.n1SGhrRE002510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-28 11:43:51 EDT --- If so, then you should open (if still not opened by someone) bug against koji and mark it as blocker for this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 17:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 181801] Review Request: zeroinstall-injector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281706.n1SH6HFb006185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181801 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-28 12:06:13 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: zeroinstall-injector New Branches: EL-5 Owners: salimma I've just tested and zeroinstall-injector work just fine on CentOS 5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 17:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281725.n1SHPYBq009435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-28 12:25:32 EDT --- Changes look good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 17:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281731.n1SHVMrU007032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #16 from Matthias Saou 2009-02-28 12:31:19 EDT --- Luke, could you give a life sign? It's been over a year since your last comment here :-) And either confirm that you still want to maintain this package, in which case I'll review it, or that you don't, in which case I'll pick it up and need someone to review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281821.n1SILnCq013986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #63 from Michael Cronenworth 2009-02-28 13:21:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > The network button doesn't work for me still, so I'll have to figure that out > ... You need 0.9.12 in order to have the network button work as mentioned in my comment right above yours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:22:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487840] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton - Singleton to context In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281822.n1SIM0R0014034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487840 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 13:21:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Singleton Short Description: Singleton to context Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487874] Review Request: fcode-utils - Utilities for dealing with FCode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281823.n1SINDcv017620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487874 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-28 13:23:11 EDT --- Ok, I added installation of 'localvalues': http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fcode-utils.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/fcode-utils-1.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Here is a koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1209116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:24:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:24:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487852] Review Request: perl-HTML-SimpleParse - Bare-bones HTML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281824.n1SIOChG017707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487852 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 13:24:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-SimpleParse Short Description: Bare-bones HTML parser Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487847] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Merge - Three-way merge and diff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281823.n1SINcWr017663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487847 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 13:23:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Algorithm-Merge Short Description: Three-way merge and diff Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487841] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode - Unicode aware Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281822.n1SIMx5B017596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487841 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 13:22:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode Short Description: Unicode aware Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487856] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator - Validates user input (usually from an HTML form) based on input profile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281825.n1SIPA8l014514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487856 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-02-28 13:25:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-FormValidator Short Description: Validates user input based on input profile Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281836.n1SIaHoY016169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-28 13:36:16 EDT --- PRE-review for 0.2.6-2 (yes, PRE-review...) * About patch - Would you explain what the soname "libzzub.so.0.3" "liblunarstd.so.0" come from? (anyway the soname "libzzub.so.0.3 is wrong, it should be "libzzub.so.0" or so) - Also, non-patched src/plugins/lunar/SConscript seems to be saying that liblunarstd.so is a plugin module, not a system-wide library. Are you sure that this file should really be system-wide library? * License tag - License tag is inherited to all subpackages unless explicitly specified (try $ rpm -qi armstrong-devel or so. I think this should just be "GPLv2+") * internal libraries -------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Remove the binded libraries. We'll use the internal ones -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - You mean "external ones"? * Document directories -------------------------------------------------------------------------- %doc installed_docs/* %{_defaultdocdir}/zzub -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - With this armstrong will own two directories for documents, %{_defaultdocdir}/{zzub,%{name}-%{version}}. I think this is confusing and these directories should be unified. - Also, anyway as this spec file has: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- # We want to install docs to the proper location: mkdir -p installed_docs mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/zzub/* installed_docs/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently %_defaultdocdir/zzub is just empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487879] New: Review Request: python-reinteract - Interactive shell for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-reinteract - Interactive shell for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487879 Summary: Review Request: python-reinteract - Interactive shell for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-reinteract.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/python-reinteract-0.4.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Reinteract is a system for interactive experimentation with Python. Reinteract worksheets contain Python code combined with the results of that code, formatted as text or graphical plots. Unlike a traditional shell, you can go back and edit previously entered statements, and the results will update. Among other things, Reinteract is suitable for experimentation with the Python language and for data analysis using the NumPy and SciPy packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281848.n1SImgHe018202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #64 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-02-28 13:48:39 EDT --- Thanks, Mike. Was just about to summarise my findings re: network button I already had 0.9.12 final release, but the problem was that NetworkManager wasn't running. [jeff at localhost ~]$ gconftool-2 -R /desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu network_config_tool_nm = /usr/share/applications/nm-connection-editor.desktop ... network_config_tool = /usr/share/applications/YaST2/lan.desktop There are two things that can happen when you click the network-status-tile: 1. If NetworkManager is running, it'll run "nm-connection-editor" 2. If NM is not running, it'll run "yast2 -lan" (assuming you have some flavor of suse installed). There's two ways to "fix" this. The problem stays hidden if you run NM, but being the perfectionist that I am, here's my fix: [jeff at localhost ~]$ gconftool-2 -t string -s /desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu/network_config_tool /usr/share/applications/redhat-system-config-network.desktop Now to figure out where in the source tree that actually lives so that installing the RPM "just works". Neither the final release from gnome, nor any of Karl's patches addresses this niggly (but irritating) issue. 0.9.12-final now compiles just fine, but I need to package the patches for a proper fedora build before posting. Does anyone know if 0.9.13 real? The download page and the SVN don't seem to agree on what the latest version is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 18:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487879] Review Request: python-reinteract - Interactive shell for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281851.n1SIpPRH018895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487879 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-28 13:51:24 EDT --- Koji build for F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1209236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 19:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225814] Merge Review: gnome-bluetooth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281925.n1SJPQi1027927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225814 Andrey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaafree at yahoo.com Flag|needinfo?(jmoskovc at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Andrey 2009-02-28 14:25:24 EDT --- It seems the Bastien Nocera did just the opposite. Recently he had moved bluez-gnome to gnome-bluetooth in the upstream. Please see details here: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-bluetooth?view=revision&revision=305 I believe now bluez-gnome has to be removed from Fedora and gnome-bluetooth updated to the latest version. After that this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 19:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487637] Review Request: rtaudio - Real-time Audio I/O Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281929.n1SJT7jq024897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487637 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-28 14:29:06 EDT --- No, it is the former. But I realized that the empty directory tests/Release is really needed to build these binaries. So I shouldn't remove this directory in the %prep. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rtaudio.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rtaudio-4.0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 4.0.5-3 - Don't remove the tests/Release directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 19:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281944.n1SJiCt5030860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #8 from Robert Spanton 2009-02-28 14:44:10 EDT --- Hi Ralf, Thanks. The CFLAGS issue that you spotted fixes building against rawhide on ppc64. However, it doesn't fix building against F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1208914 So, I can either lean towards rawhide here or F10. Disabling the ppc64 build will make both work, but there'll be no ppc64 in rawhide. Once it's in CVS, I can enable the ppc64 build for rawhide. Does that sound like a sensible strategy? > b) Remove all the hack entirely and live with the warnings brp-strip issues > However, you seem to be lucky, this seems possible in this case, because > brp-strip etc. (at least on Fedora 10) are broken enough not to try corrupting > your target's files. Unfortunately this doesn't work. The brp-strip stuff does touch the libgcc.a file, resulting in an unusable compiler. I had a look at hacking the brp-strip scripts up more, but I can't see the problem with them. The output of: rpm -ql msp430-gcc | while read f; do file $f | grep ELF | grep -v stripped; done All the host binaries are stripped successfully when the brp-strip hacking is in place. I've added your suggestions for the setup macro (I can't believe that one has to read the RPM source to find out what those %setup parameters mean. Terrible!) and moved the man pages. > Finally, I guess you know that gcc-3.2.3 is dead and discontinued for ca. > 5 years - Not actually something I would want to maintain ;-) Unfortunately, this is the situation with mspgcc. Most of the mspgcc development is focussed on 3.2.3. Yes, this is a pain. However, hopefully packaging it up and making it available in a major distribution will help to breathe life into the project. Once people start using it, I think they'll begin to appreciate why using those non-free compilers is an inferior option. As I'm sure you're aware, it's mighty difficult to get started on GCC hacking. I don't really see how we can get out of this situation until that changes :-/ New files: Spec file: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc.spec SRPM: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc-3.2.3-2.20090210cvs.fc10.src.rpm Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 19:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902281948.n1SJmgis031775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #65 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-02-28 14:48:39 EDT --- I'm posting the x86_64 RPMs first. 32 bit RPMs out shortly. Follow instructions in http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora10/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-3/index.html http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora10/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-3/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12-3.src.rpm http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora10/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-3/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12-3.x86_64.rpm http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora10/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-3/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.12-3.x86_64.rpm http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora10/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-3/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.12-3.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 20:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282009.n1SK9CAu031319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-28 15:09:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > PRE-review for 0.2.6-2 (yes, PRE-review...) > :) Thanks for the PRE-review > * About patch > - Would you explain what the soname "libzzub.so.0.3" "liblunarstd.so.0" > come from? > (anyway the soname "libzzub.so.0.3 is wrong, it should be "libzzub.so.0" > or so) If we use the original tarball with no patches, these libraries will be built with no sonames. The soname "libzzub.so.0.3" comes from the old libzzub package. There the soname was set to "libzzub.so.0.2.3" . I changed this to "libzzub.so.0" now. The soname "liblunarstd.so.0" is the soname I gave to this library. Otherwise rpmlint will complain that there is no soname. > - Also, non-patched src/plugins/lunar/SConscript seems to be saying > that liblunarstd.so is a plugin module, not a system-wide library. > Are you sure that this file should really be system-wide library? > >From my understanding this is a system-wide library. There are two systemwide libraries provided by armstrong. One is libzzub, the other is liblunarstd. The unpatched tarball has these two lines: In src/libzzub/SConscript : libzzub = localenv.SharedLibrary('${LIB_BUILD_PATH}/zzub',files) In src/plugins/lunar/SConscript : lunarstd = lunarstdenv.SharedLibrary('${LIB_BUILD_PATH}/lunarstd', lunarstdfiles)[0] That's why I believe that both are system-wide shared libraries. Note that there are plugin module .so files in /usr/lib64/lunar/ /usr/lib64/zzub/ > * License tag > - License tag is inherited to all subpackages unless explicitly > specified (try $ rpm -qi armstrong-devel or so. I think > this should just be "GPLv2+") > Changed the license tag of -devel and pyzzub packages to GPLv2+ > * internal libraries > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Remove the binded libraries. We'll use the internal ones > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - You mean "external ones"? > I meant "internal Fedora libraries". I agree that there is some ambiguity in my usage. I made this a little more clear on the SPEC file below.. > * Document directories > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > %doc installed_docs/* > %{_defaultdocdir}/zzub > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - With this armstrong will own two directories for documents, > %{_defaultdocdir}/{zzub,%{name}-%{version}}. I think > this is confusing and these directories should be unified. > - Also, anyway as this spec file has: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > # We want to install docs to the proper location: > mkdir -p installed_docs > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/zzub/* installed_docs/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Currently %_defaultdocdir/zzub is just empty. My bad. I changed the document directory structure when I was preparing the SPEC file. I forgot to remove the %_defaultdocdir/zzub entry. Now it's gone. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong-0.2.6-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.2.6-3 - License for -devel and pyzzub packages is GPLv2+ - Clarify system-wide library usage - Fix sonames - Don't package the empty directory %%_defaultdocdir/zzub -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 20:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469686] Review Request: ogre-meshmagick - Command line manipulation tool for Ogre meshes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282021.n1SKLMs9000728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469686 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-02-28 15:21:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/ogre-meshmagick.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/ogre-meshmagick-0.5.2-1.20090124svn2618.fc10.src.rpm * Sat Feb 28 2009 Alexey Torkhov - 0.5.2-1.20090124svn2618 - Update to post 0.5.2 Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1209402 Rpmlint output: ogre-meshmagick.src:13: W: configure-without-libdir-spec ogre-meshmagick-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet ogre-meshmagick-debuginfo-0.5.2-1.20090124svn2618.fc11.x86_64.rpm ogre-meshmagick-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 20:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487639] Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE *** In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282024.n1SKOHoP004936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-28 15:24:15 EDT --- Some more clarification: The unmodified tarball will install /usr/lib64/libzzub.so.0.3 /usr/lib64/libzzub.so.0 /usr/lib64/libzzub.so /usr/lib64/liblunarstd.so /usr/lib64/zzub/ /usr/lib64/lunar/ No libraries have any sonames. With my modification /usr/lib64/liblunarstd.so.0 will be installed in addition to the files and directories above. Also I put sonames on libraries /usr/lib64/libzzub.so.0 /usr/lib64/liblunarstd.so.0 The plugin module directories /usr/lib64/zzub/ /usr/lib64/lunar/ remain untouched. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 21:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282111.n1SLB8Fo012178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-02-28 16:11:04 EDT --- New version available: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/10/src/SRPMS/globus-core-5.15-0.4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/globus-core.spec - main merged with devel as requested - added s390x to the list of 64 bit platforms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 22:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282226.n1SMQBIS022675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #99 from Lee Howard 2009-02-28 17:25:57 EDT --- SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.9-1.src.rpm > * As the package is already hylafax, You don't need to have > Provides: hylafax Removed. > * BuildRequires: ... gcc, gcc-c++ - Those aren't needed as they are implicitly > added in the BuildDependency and shouldn't be mentioned. (older fedora version > will need this indeed). Left as-is to support older Fedora. > * Conflicts: mgetty-sendfax - We need to find a solution to avoid conflict. > and implement a proper alternative. Since this can probably not hit F-9/F-10 HylaFAX was in RedHat 5.2. mgetty-sendfax chose to develop its own "sendfax" command-line fax tool using the same "sendfax" name as HylaFAX (as well as the same /var/spool/fax spool directory - HylaFAX has since changed to /var/spool/hylafax). Because of this conflict RedHat removed HylaFAX beginning at 6.0. The conflict cannot be resolved because it was the mgetty-sendfax developer's intention to create an alternative for HylaFAX. I do not wish to offend Gert Doering, but it is my recommendation to remove mgetty-sendfax from Fedora. (Mostly because the last official release, 1.0, is dated 1998... although betas are available from 2007.) However, as I suspect that my recommendation will not be followed, it is therefore my suggestion to implement a "system-switch-fax" similar to what has been done for sendmail/Postfix. *IF* doing that work will finally get this package into Fedora - with no more hold-ups, then I will gladly go through the effort to develop system-switch-fax and make the necessary modifications to both the mgetty-sendfax package and this package. *HOWEVER*, I do not desire to go through that effort only to find that we're yet hung up on something else. Please advise. > * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1068404&name=build.log > - JBIG library was not found on x86_64 > Checking for JBIG library support > ... not found. Disabling JBIG support > Can the support for this can be enabled ? (it needs to be added as > BuildRequires first) The JBIG-KIT package is currently not in Fedora. Other distributions (i.e. Gentoo) do include it. However, there may be some patent encumbrances with respect to JBIG technology, and you may want to pass this with your legal team before including JBIG-KIT into Fedora. > * Various checks are made at build time: > WARNING, could not locate sendmail on your system. > Beware that the mail notification work done by this software uses > sendmail-specific command line options. If you do not have a > sendmail-compatible mailer things will break. > ... > WARNING, no egetty program found, using /bin/egetty. > ... > Looks like /usr/bin/gs is the PostScript RIP to use. > WARNING, /usr/bin/gs does not seem to be an executable program; > > -> Does the necessary Requires: are requested for the runtime ? > either using Requires on the package, or the "virtual provides" or on the > program path name. The warnings can be ignored. The Requires: should be sufficient, yes. Those packages are not needed for building this package, but they are needed for runtime. > -> the cron scripts should probably stay as %config files > -> the undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.2.8 > HYLAFAX_VERSION_STRING can probably be fixed. Please advise on how it can probably be fixed. > * --with-PAGESIZE=A4 - I appreciate that my standard page format to be set as > default, but is there a way to have this fixed at runtime while using system > wide configuration files for localization ? (I haven't made runtime test, as > i don't have the required hardware/phone connection. Yes, the defaults can be changed at runtime. I'm not sure there is an issue here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 22:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282238.n1SMcHcN024593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-28 17:38:15 EDT --- Michel, thanks for review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: weka Short Description: Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis Owners: mjakubicek Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 22:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282248.n1SMm0VA021671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-28 17:47:58 EDT --- As noted, in the devel ML: http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2009-02/msg01692.html it is pdftk that has the wrong Requires. 'The dependency should either be: "itext-2.1.4.jar.so()(64bit)" or then for the actual file: "/usr/lib64/gcj/itext/itext-2.1.4.jar.so"' Right now the dependency is /usr/lib64/gcj/itext/itext-2.1.4.jar.so()(64bit) which is meaningless. So shall we work around the automatic dependency generation of pdftk? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 22:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485641] Review Request: pdftk - The PDF Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282251.n1SMppTi022387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485641 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-28 17:51:51 EDT --- Well, since both solutions (1- adding the "meaningless" Provides on itext and 2- hacking the dependencies of pdftk) are both workarounds and not actual solutions, I'm leaving it to Jochen to decide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282331.n1SNVoQL032617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-28 18:31:48 EDT --- gget-0.0.4-9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gget-0.0.4-9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478504] Review Request: gget - Download Manager for the GNOME desktop. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282331.n1SNViWF032582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478504 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2009-02-28 18:31:39 EDT --- gget-0.0.4-9.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gget-0.0.4-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282336.n1SNaVBh000890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-28 18:36:28 EDT --- *** Bug 487879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487879] Review Request: python-reinteract - Interactive shell for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282336.n1SNaULK000853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487879 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-02-28 18:36:28 EDT --- Bizarre, searching for package reviews containing 'reinteract' did not show up the previous (completed) review. Marking this as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467365 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282340.n1SNeIEM001479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:40:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480102] Review Request: weka - Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282341.n1SNfZF8001677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480102 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:41:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484560] Review Request: pydb - An expanded version of the Python debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282339.n1SNd153029348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484560 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:39:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487365] Review Request: eclipse-oprofile - Eclipse plugin for OProfile integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282344.n1SNijDF001942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487365 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:44:43 EDT --- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487730] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-XMPP - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282347.n1SNl0V9030638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487730 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:46:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487645] Review Request: mediawiki-wikicalendar - Simple calendar extension for mediawiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282345.n1SNjtrb030452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487645 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:45:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 28 23:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487839] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Email - Send emails with Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200902282348.n1SNmC1f002779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-28 18:48:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.