[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567





--- Comment #69 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com>  2009-02-03 16:27:38 EDT ---


(In reply to comment #68)
> (In reply to comment #66)
> likely anyways), the be renamed and a header that would include one depending
> on __WORD_SIZE will be in their original place. This is a common practice.

It would be an accurate solution, indeed.

> When someone says "devel package", what comes to my mind is "useful for
> development"
Actually the package name is already ETL which only produce an ETL-devel.

So I think we are good. I'm looking synfig/synfig studio to have usability
tests of the ETL package...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.