[Bug 484229] Review Request: qbittorrent - A bittorrent Client

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 8 13:14:07 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484229





--- Comment #18 from leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com>  2009-02-08 08:14:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Created an attachment (id=331236)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331236) [details]
> patch for spec file
> 
> > I have read the packaging guidelines and found nothing that
> > expressly prohibits this , so fixing this error isn't mandatory ,
> > is this correct ?
> 
> No. For this review a fix will be mandatory. I'm going to test-build with
> attached patch, as I believe it to be the correct way to package this app.
> 
> The buildroot path being used in %build (instead of just %install) usually is a
> packaging mistake/pitfall. It has lead to trouble several times before.
> 
> The guidelines aren't as complete as necessary to cover each and every
> packaging detail. In corner-cases it may be "okay" to use the buildroot path in
> %build. But then you should have a much better rationale than a spec file
> comment such as "needs the RPM_BUILD_ROOT in prefix to build". That's too vague
> and unconvincing.

Thank you for the patch it works fine, I didn't know about the INSTALL_ROOT
option.


Here are the new SRPM & Spec file with your changes from you patch 

Spec URL:
http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_3/qbittorrent.spec


SRPM URL:
http://dnmouse.org/fedora/qbittorrent_review/review_changes/new_3/qbittorrent-1.3.1-6.fc10.src.rpm





Thank you for your help.


Leigh

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list