[Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 13 13:46:37 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007


Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mmaslano at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano at redhat.com>  2009-02-13 08:46:35 EDT ---
FAIL source files match upstream
The source should be written as whole path.
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK build root is correct.
OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124650
OK debuginfo package isn't need.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires look sane.
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK no scriptlets present.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.

Shouldn't be test executed as a part of build process?
(btw you have ugly man page of rhnpush the synopsis part.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list