[Bug 485416] New: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 13 14:29:42 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416
Summary: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC
for the MSP430
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rspanton at zepler.net
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc.spec
SRPM URL:
http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc-3.2.3-1.20090210cvs.fc10.src.rpm
Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU GCC, which can be used to
compile for the msp430 platform, instead of for the native i386
platform.
The mspgcc project has maintained patches against gcc 3.2.3 for a long time.
The documented procedure for installing mspgcc is taking their patches and
applying them against gcc.
I based this on the avr-gcc spec.
One rpmlint warning:
msp430-gcc.spec:46: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -e 's,find
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libexecdir,' $a >
$b
I don't believe this error is fatal. The script needs to modify the
os_install_post script so that the build system doesn't try to process the
msp430 binaries with the tools for the host's architecture.
Build fails on ppc64 in koji, but succeeds on all the other arches (I shall
attach the error message to this bug shortly).
I'd really appreciate a review of this. Thanks :-D
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list