[Bug 480249] Review Request: unalz - Decompression utility

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Feb 14 19:37:50 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480249


Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa <cooly at gnome.eu.org>  2009-02-14 14:37:49 EDT ---
This is a simple package; it builds fine and rpmlint is silent.

Review:

OK source files match upstream:
        974ff01225273f1ef70c5f1a2d27d25b219bc43719f90ea80e550feaab46876f 
unalz-0.64.tgz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK summary a short and concise description.
OK description is OK.
Ok dist tag is present.
OK build root is sane.
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible.
OK license text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
OK package installs properly.
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires are sane:
        unalz = 0.64-1.fc11
        unalz(x86-64) = 0.64-1.fc11
        =
        libc.so.6()(64bit)
        libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
        libm.so.6()(64bit)
        libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
        libz.so.1()(64bit)
OK %check is not present; no test suite upstream
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list