[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 15 14:50:31 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644





--- Comment #6 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net>  2009-02-15 09:50:30 EDT ---
Ok, I'm on the way to fix the desktop file.

Sorry to ask again, it's not clear for me, the documentation here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories says:

 %{_datadir}/foo/*

This includes everything _in_ "foo", but not "foo" itself. "rpm -qlv pkgname"
will show a missing drwxr-xr-x entry for "foo". Correct would be:

 %{_datadir}/foo/

to include the directory _and_ the entire tree below it. 

And rpm -qplv screenlets-0.1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm already lists this directories
...
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 févr. 15 15:38
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets
...
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 févr. 15 15:38
/usr/share/screenlets
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 févr. 15 15:38
/usr/share/screenlets-manager
...

What am I missing? Can a directory be in the listing but still be unowned?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list