[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 15 14:50:31 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644
--- Comment #6 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko at linuxed.net> 2009-02-15 09:50:30 EDT ---
Ok, I'm on the way to fix the desktop file.
Sorry to ask again, it's not clear for me, the documentation here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories says:
%{_datadir}/foo/*
This includes everything _in_ "foo", but not "foo" itself. "rpm -qlv pkgname"
will show a missing drwxr-xr-x entry for "foo". Correct would be:
%{_datadir}/foo/
to include the directory _and_ the entire tree below it.
And rpm -qplv screenlets-0.1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm already lists this directories
...
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 févr. 15 15:38
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/screenlets
...
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 févr. 15 15:38
/usr/share/screenlets
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 févr. 15 15:38
/usr/share/screenlets-manager
...
What am I missing? Can a directory be in the listing but still be unowned?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list