[Bug 485580] Review Request: netactview - Graphical network connections viewer for Linux

Mon Feb 16 08:38:57 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580

--- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>  2009-02-16 03:38:55 EDT ---
I do not think that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database
applies to this case, there is no MimeType key desktop entry.

The author denied my request to add the license to all source files. I am
quoting below our mails and his translated answer:

"Deliberately I have not included a header with the license in each file. The
license is specified in the file named COPYING and is relevant to the whole
program with all its files. The program and all its files are licensed as
GPLv2"

Based on the content of the COPYING and the header of the main.c files, I think
that it is safe to presume that the author makes no difference between GPLv2
and GPLv2+ and since both files indicate GPLv2+, this is the license to be used
by us.

[172.16.52.254])
 by mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FGIDHU018478
 for <wolfy at fedoraproject.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:14 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
 by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1FGIDsK001041
 for <wolfy at fedoraproject.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:13 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f10.google.com (mail-fx0-f10.google.com
[209.85.220.10])
 by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1FGHxAq020472
 for <wolfy at fedoraproject.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:18:00 -0500
Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so3277418fxm.17
        for <wolfy at fedoraproject.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:17:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=DLQZiH7Fh1evsUpENhH8aXdLCHG1tqLvZsK9fxGkgTE=;
        b=Nk1rVe4XYZ3daCwHijc/hVE0+P4ialpDxKFP0KaHUbfSHDUC2HQuIFD405JZ7arcKU
         kttOr3s0q0qc9iLXvVTVNcvo6Z+pQdKwA+FrpGoFmggN8NtBp67RTq0R1OatBXNeRcev
         g7iOJ/X2JNraHhh2bK9EJesVqywpsp+I/bIkk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=duG5Js4Xso5qHHOtetWIFwB27h/H81yxbksICyx6AShyaRBFuDavyHuPV0IswUlwsg
         0fEu84CqE7AdezUW0BMA3gFxoOUfnX6mLksNQsVX+Lqpb50W52tmh6xOJ1+oW87jUL2g
         CSTXo+hMRsA3erbooEMLegUJkr+7bN1g8Ik/c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.241.15 with SMTP id t15mr2381592mur.85.1234714679154; Sun, 
 15 Feb 2009 08:17:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4997B5C9.7070400 at fedoraproject.org>
References: <4997B5C9.7070400 at fedoraproject.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:17:59 +0200
Message-ID: <8a5752f30902150817q187a872ajd01433b81e0b35bc at mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Net Activity Viewer - licenta
From: Mihai Varzaru <mihaiv at gmail.com>
To: manuel wolfshant <wolfy at fedoraproject.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b430c8d999200462f769fe
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.001 
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.48.31

--001636b430c8d999200462f769fe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Nu am inclus in mod intentionat un header cu licenta in fiecare fisier.
Licenta este specificata in fisierul COPYING si se aplica intregului program
cu toate fisierele sale. Programul cu toate fisierele sale sunt licentiate
cu GPL v2.

2009/2/15 manuel wolfshant <wolfy at fedoraproject.org>

>  Buna Mihai
>
>     Scuze ca te deranjez, dar am o rugaminte. Programul tau este in curs de
> a fi inclus in Fedora ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485580),  dar in cursul verificarilor premergatoare includerii am observat ca
> fisierele sursa nu au inclusa licenta sub care este distribuit programul
> decit in fisierul main.c. Din considerente legale (in SUA..) este preferabil
> ca fiecare fisier sursa (.h / .c) sa includa un header in care sa fie
> specificata licenta exacta sub care se afla, facilitind astfel si
> posibilitatea ca fisiere din un program sa fie folosite in altul.
>     De aceea avem rugamintea sa incluzi si tu aceste informatii in toate
> fisierele sursa.
>     Multumesc anticipat
>
>        manuel
>

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.