[Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 20 02:38:23 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-02-19 21:38:22 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
923d4dba39b1f313631b636e7b5d772d xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2.tar.bz2
923d4dba39b1f313631b636e7b5d772d xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2.tar.bz2.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
Issues:
1. rpmlint says:
xfce4-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-power-manager.desktop
I think this can be ignored. No one should be editing xdg autostart files
should they?
2. Don't include a --vendor in the desktop file install, per:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
Or is --vendor="" the same as no vendor?
I don't see any other blockers here... if you can address the --vendor
thing before importing that could be good, otherwise this package is
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list