[Bug 486476] Review Request: xfce4-power-manager - Power management for the Xfce desktop environment

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 20 02:38:23 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486476


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2009-02-19 21:38:22 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name. 
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. 
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. 
OK - License (GPLv2+)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
923d4dba39b1f313631b636e7b5d772d  xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2.tar.bz2
923d4dba39b1f313631b636e7b5d772d  xfce4-power-manager-0.6.2.tar.bz2.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. 
OK - Package has a correct %clean section. 
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content. 
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. 
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. 
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. 
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. 
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. 
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output. 
OK - final provides and requires are sane.

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock. 
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin

Issues: 

1. rpmlint says: 

xfce4-power-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-power-manager.desktop

I think this can be ignored. No one should be editing xdg autostart files
should they?

2. Don't include a --vendor in the desktop file install, per: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

Or is --vendor="" the same as no vendor?

I don't see any other blockers here... if you can address the --vendor
thing before importing that could be good, otherwise this package is 
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list