[Bug 226027] Merge Review: libICE

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 22 21:29:30 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226027


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-02-22 16:29:28 EDT ---
So rpmlint is just:

libICE.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libICE.so.6.3.0 
  exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
libICE-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation

Neither of those is really a problem, although there's probably a bug in the
first one.

I made some tweaks in CVS:
- Minor changes to 
- Don't own /usr/include/X11
- No need for a versioned dependency on xorg-x11-filesystem.
- Change xorg-x11-filesystem to a regular dependency.

Honestly I'm not sure why the -devel package had
  Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem
since it has no scriptlets.  I hope I'm not missing something.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   13055e2f4c645cbd135ce97a7974a5866f9ba3ed8988e686b552f55c30514f04  
   libICE-1.0.4.tar.bz2
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
 summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  libICE-1.0.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm
   libICE.so.6()(64bit)
   libICE = 1.0.4-6.fc11
   libICE(x86-64) = 1.0.4-6.fc11
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libICE.so.6()(64bit)

  libICE-devel-1.0.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm
   pkgconfig(ice) = 1.0.4
   libICE-devel = 1.0.4-6.fc11
   libICE-devel(x86-64) = 1.0.4-6.fc11
  =
   /usr/bin/pkg-config
   libICE = 1.0.4-6.fc11
   libICE.so.6()(64bit)
   pkgconfig
   pkgconfig(xproto)
   xorg-x11-filesystem
   xorg-x11-proto-devel


* a shared library is present:
  ldconfig is called properly
  unversioned .so link is in the -devel package.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets are OK (ldconfig).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package.
* pkgconfig file is in the -devel package.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED, and closed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list