[Bug 487241] New: Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 24 22:34:35 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487241

           Summary: Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy
                    Service
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora
    Target Release: ---


Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/ntlmaps/ntlmaps.spec
SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/ntlmaps/ntlmaps-1.0-1.src.rpm
Description: 
NTLM Authorization Proxy Server is a proxy software that allows you to
authenticate via a Microsoft Proxy Server using the proprietary NTLM
protocol. Since version 0.9.5 APS has an ability to behave as a
standalone proxy server and authenticate http clients at web servers
using NTLM method.


rpmlint output:
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Note, I am a new upstream maintainer for this very old project.  As such, the
current source code is not tagged as version 1.0 yet in the upstream SVN, but I
intend to tag it as version 1.0 quite soon, pending any major bugs found over
the next few days.  I won't request a Fedora build of the code until I have
tagged the upstream as version 1.0, but also wanted to get the review started
now.

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list