[Bug 487639] New: Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE ***

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 27 07:36:28 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing library *** RENAMED PACKAGE ***

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487639

           Summary: Review Request: armstrong - Powerful music sequencing
                    library *** RENAMED PACKAGE ***
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong.spec
SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/armstrong-0.2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
If you are searching for a foundation for your next soundtracker, armstrong is
what you want. armstrong provides an extensible DSP plugin system, a wavetable,
instruments, a multitrack sequencer and support for major soundcard APIs.
armstrong includes zzub and lunar libraries.

Rpmlint:
There are bunch of 
   W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
warnings. But these files are really needed during runtime. I know it is weird.

If you want to test these libraries you can try aldrin:
   http://oget.fedorapeople.org/aldrin/
There will be sample files inside 
   /usr/share/aldrin/demosongs/
aldrin is an accepted package but I didn't update it because it requires
armstrong-0.2.6.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list